Fortmann SP, Bailey SR, Brooks NB, Hitsman B, Rittner SS, Gillespie SE, Hill CN, Leo MC, Crawford PM, Hu W, King DS, O'Cleirigh C, Puro J, Ann McBurnie M. Trends in smoking documentation rates in safety net clinics.
Health Serv Res 2020;
55:170-177. [PMID:
31930738 DOI:
10.1111/1475-6773.13259]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the impact of provider incentive policy on smoking status documentation.
DATA SOURCES
Primary data were extracted from structured electronic medical records (EMRs) from 15 community health centers (CHCs).
STUDY DESIGN
This was an observational study of data from 2006 to 2013, assessing changes in documentation of smoking status over time.
DATA EXTRACTION METHODS
We extracted structured EMR data for patients age 18 and older with at least one primary care visit.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Rates of documented smoking status rose from 30 percent in 2006 to 90 percent in 2013; the largest increase occurred from 2011 to 2012 following policy changes (21.3% [95% CI, 8.2%, 34.4%] from the overall trend). Rates varied by clinic and across patient subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
Documentation of smoking status improved markedly after introduction of new federal standards. Further improvement in documentation is still needed, especially for males, nonwhite patients, those using opioids, and HIV + patients. More research is needed to study whether changes in documentation lead to improvements in counseling, cessation, and patient outcomes.
Collapse