Efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin and melatonin agonists in preventing postoperative delirium (POD).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through December 2022. The primary outcome was efficacy based on the incidence of POD (POD-I). Secondary outcomes included efficacy and safety according to the length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, in-hospital mortality, and adverse events. Subgroup analyses of POD-I were based on the type and dose of drug (low- and high-dose melatonin, ramelteon), the postoperative period (early or late), and the type of surgery.

RESULTS

In the analysis (16 RCTs, 1981 patients), POD-I was lower in the treatment group than in the control group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.57). POD-I was lower in the high-dose melatonin group than in the control group (RR = 0.41), whereas no benefit was observed in the low-dose melatonin and ramelteon groups. POD-I was lower in the melatonin group in the early postoperative period (RR = 0.35) and in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary surgery (RR = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative melatonin or melatonin agonist treatment suppressed POD without severe adverse events, particularly at higher doses, during the early postoperative period, and after cardiopulmonary surgery.

Updated Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

Surgical resection is currently the best curative approach for gastric cancer (GC); however, the prognosis of patients with advanced GC remains poor even with curative resection. For this reason, perioperative chemotherapy has been combined with surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence. Standard perioperative chemotherapy for resectable advanced GC varies from region to region. Postoperative S-1 therapy was standardized via the ACTS-GC study in East Asia, perioperative ECF (Epirubicin + Cisplatin + Fluorouracil) was standardized via the MAGIC study in Europe, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy was standardized via the US intergroup study in North America. Since then, more intensive regimens have been developed. In recent years, perioperative therapy using novel agents, such as molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has also been tested and evaluated in the three major regions (East Asia, Europe, and North America) with promising results. Perioperative chemotherapy has become an integral part of many treatment strategies and requires continued research and evaluation.

Essential updates 2021/2022: Perioperative and surgical treatments for gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer

In recent years, important clinical trials for gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) have been reported, changing the strategies of surgical and perioperative treatment. Although laparoscopic gastrectomy has already been shown to be effective for early-stage cancer, recent evidence from both Asia (JLSSG0901, CLASS-01 and KLASS-02) and Europe (LOGICA and STOMACH trials) has demonstrated that it is useful for advanced GC. Robotic surgery has been rapidly gaining popularity in recent years, and randomized controlled trials are ongoing to evaluate its efficacy. A prospective nationwide multicenter study mapped sites with frequent metastasis and revealed lymphatic flow specific to EGJC, thus establishing the optimal lymph node dissection area and surgical approach based on esophageal involvement. Perioperative chemotherapy, the mainstay of treatment in Europe, also has been established in Asia by the PRODIGY and RESOLVE studies. New clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy or molecular-targeted therapy with perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. In this review, we present important recent clinical trials regarding the treatment of GC and EGJC published in 2021 or 2022.

A small-scale, exploratory real-world study of nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin and tegafur in the perioperative treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a study protocol for a real-world clinical trial

Background

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is an optimized and improved derivative of paclitaxel with superior efficacy and fewer adverse reactions, and it is widely used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin (LBP) and tegafur in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

This analysis is a prospective, single-center, open-label, historically controlled real-world study designed to include 10 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel combined with LBP and tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium. The primary and main efficacy outcomes are safety indicators, including the incidence of adverse drug reactions and adverse events (AEs), as well as the outliers of laboratory indicators and vital signs. The secondary efficacy outcomes are overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and proportion of dose suspensions, dose reductions and discontinuations.

Discussion

Based on the findings of previous studies, we wished to assess the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with LBP and tegafur in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The trial requires constant contact and monitoring. The purpose is to determine a superior protocol in terms of patient survival, and pathological and objective response.

Trial Registration

This trial has been registered with the Clinical Trial Registry: NCT05052931 (registration date: 2021/9/12).

Perioperative FLOT plus ramucirumab for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase II/III trial of the German AIO and Italian GOIM

This multicenter, randomized phase II/III study evaluated the addition of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor ramucirumab to FLOT as perioperative treatment for resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received either FLOT alone (Arm A) or combined with ramucirumab followed by ramucirumab monotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was the pathological complete or subtotal response (pCR/pSR) rate. Baseline characteristics were comparable between both arms with a high rate of tumors signet-ring cell component (A:47% B:43%). No between-arm difference in pCR/pSR rate was seen (A:29% B:26%), therefore the transition to phase III was not pursued. Nevertheless, the combination was associated with a significantly increased R0-resection rate compared with FLOT alone (A:82% B:96%; P = .009). In addition, the median disease-free survival was numerically improved in Arm B (A:21 months B:32 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.218), while the median overall survival was similar in both treatment arms (A:45 months B:46 months, HR 0.94, P = 0.803). Patients with Siewert type I tumors receiving transthoracic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis showed an increased risk of serious postoperative complications after ramucirumab treatment, therefore recruitment of those patients was stopped after the first-third of the study. Overall, surgical morbidity and mortality was comparable, whereas more non-surgical grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed with the combination, especially anorexia (A:1% B:11%), hypertension (A:4% B:13%) and infections (A:19% B:33%). The combination of ramucirumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment shows efficacy signals, particularly in terms of R0 resection rates, for a study population with a high proportion of prognostically poor histological subtypes, and further evaluation in this subgroup seems warranted.

Perioperative treatment and biomarker analysis of LP002, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, plus chemotherapy in resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to perioperative chemotherapy in operable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer has become one of the research hotspots, while reliable biomarkers for efficacy are lacking. We conducted a phase 1 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of LP002, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, plus chemotherapy as perioperative treatment in patients with gastric or GEJ cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with resectable and PD-L1 positive gastric or GEJ cancers. Eligible patients received three preoperative and six postoperative cycles of intravenous LP002 with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included rate of margin-free (R0) resection and pathological complete response (pCR). We also characterized changes in the tumor immune microenvironment using multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF) staining and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with pre- and post-treatment tumor samples.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 28 had GEJ cancer. With a median follow-up of 7.9 months, all patients completed preoperative treatment, and 27 patients underwent surgery. Twenty-four patients underwent R0 resection. Six patients (20.0%) had Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-3, including one achieving pCR. Twenty-seven patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), while grade 3-4 TRAEs were observed in 11 patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. MIF staining revealed that TRG 1-3 group was associated with a higher density of PD-L1+/CD68+ cells in the pre-treatment tumor parenchyma than TRG 4-5 group (p = 0.048). NGS studies with paired pre- and post-treatment tumor samples revealed the disappearance of pre-existing mutations, the emergence of new mutations, and variations in the abundance of mutations after preoperative LP002 and chemotherapy. Meanwhile, tumor mutational burden decreased in patients with TRG 1-3 (p = 0.0313).

CONCLUSIONS

LP002 plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil are safe in patients with gastric or GEJ cancer, and patient selection via appropriate biomarkers is needed in the future.

Multiplex immune profiling reveals the role of serum immune proteomics in predicting response to preoperative chemotherapy of gastric cancer

Responses toward preoperative chemotherapy are heterogeneous in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Existing studies in the field focus heavily on the tumor microenvironment (TME), whereas little is known about the relationship between systemic immunity and chemotherapy response. In this study, we collect serum samples from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma before, on, and after preoperative chemotherapy and study their immune proteomics using an antibody-based proteomics panel. We also collect surgically resected tumor samples and incorporate multiple methods to assess their TME. We find that both local and systemic immune features are associated with treatment response. Preoperative chemotherapy induces a sophisticated systemic immune response indicated by dynamic serum immune proteomics. A pretreatment serum protein scoring system is established for response prediction. Together, these findings highlight the fundamental but largely underestimated role of systemic immunity in the treatment of gastric cancer, suggesting a patient stratification strategy based on pretreatment serum immune proteomics.

Perioperative or only adjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic cancer (NEONAX)-a randomized phase II trial of the AIO pancreatic cancer group

BACKGROUND

Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two pre-operative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a difference in chemotherapy exposure with 90% of patients in arm A completing pre-operative chemotherapy and 58% of patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy in arm B. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a novel option for patients with resectable PDAC. However, the optimal treatment regimen has yet to be defined. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047513) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2013-005559-34).

Prognostic factors of perioperative FLOT regimen in operable gastric and gastroesophageal junction tumors: real-life data (Turkish Oncology Group)

BACKGROUND

Perioperative FLOT regimen is a standard of care in locally advanced operable gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. We aimed to determine the efficacy, prognostic factors of perioperative FLOT chemotherapy in real-life gastric and GEJ tumors.

METHODS

The data of patients who were treated with perioperative FLOT chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed from 34 different oncology centers in Turkey. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, pretreatment laboratory values, histological and molecular characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients were included in the study. The median of age our study population was 60 years. The majority of patients with radiological staging were cT3-4N(+) (89.9%, n = 338). After median 13.5 months (IQR: 8.5-20.5) follow-up, the median overall survival was NR (95% CI, NR to NR), and median disease free survival was 22.9 (95% CI, 18.6 to 27.3) months. The estimated overall survival at 24 months was 62%. Complete pathological response (pCR) and near pCR was achieved in 23.8% of all patients. Patients with lower NLR or PLR have significantly longer median OS (p = 0.007 and p = 0.033, respectively), and patients with lower NLR have significantly longer median DFS (p = 0.039), but PLR level did not affect DFS (p = 0.062). The OS and DFS of patients with better ECOG performance scores and those who could receive FLOT as adjuvant chemotherapy instead of other regimens were found to be better. NLR was found to be independent prognostic factor for OS in the multivariant analysis. At least one adverse event reported in 57.6% of the patients and grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 23.6% patients.

DISCUSSION

Real-life perioperative FLOT regimen in operable gastric and GEJ tumors showed similar oncologic outcomes compared to clinical trials. Better performance status, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy as same regimen, low grade and low NLR and PLR improved outcomes in real-life. However, in multivariate analysis, only NLR affected OS.

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced appendiceal cancers: summary of the literature and future directions

Appendiceal cancer is rare and encompasses a diverse group of tumours ranging from low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms to high-grade adenocarcinomas. Appendiceal cancers often spread to the peritoneal cavity causing extensive mucinous dissemination and peritoneal metastases. Prognosis varies with histological subtype. Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy is well-established as the most effective treatment achieving long-term survival in some patients. Chemotherapy regimens used to treat appendiceal cancer are extrapolated from the colorectal cancer setting, but disease biology differs and outcomes are inferior. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of appendiceal cancer remains poorly defined. There is an urgent need to develop novel tailored treatment strategies in the perioperative and unresectable setting. This review aims to evaluate the literature for patients who received intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for appendiceal cancers.

A sebészeti elvek változása a modern, hatékony, perioperatív onkológiai kezelések következményeként

Összefoglaló. Az onkológia hatalmas mértékben fejlődött az elmúlt negyedszázadban. A jelentős siker hátterében sok tényező áll, így a primer és szekunder prevenció, a diagnosztika fejlődése, a kemo- és radioterápia új módszerei és az alapkutatási eredmények beépülése a gyakorlatba. A sebészet szempontjából a fejlődésben a legnagyobb szerepet a műtét előtti onkoterápia elveinek kidolgozása és széles körű gyakorlati alkalmazása játszotta. A Pécsi Tudományegyetem Sebészeti Klinikáján 1997 és 2005 között 44 gyomorrákos és 102, borderline reszekábilis vagy irreszekábilis stádiumban levő nyelőcsőrákos beteget részesítettek perioperatív kezelésben. A válaszadás mértéke mindkét csoportban 50% felett volt, és komplett patológiai remissziót sikerült elérni 3 gyomorrákos és 17 nyelőcsőrákos betegnél. A saját és az irodalmi adatok elemzése kapcsán hét új onkológiai sebészeti elv kialakulását észlelték a nagyon sikeres perioperatív kezelés következtében. A megkívánt szabad reszekciós szél a vizsgált betegcsoportokban milliméteres nagyságrendűre csökkent. Ez ún. szervmegtartó műtétekre adott lehetőséget. A prognózis szempontjából a perioperatív kezelés utáni stádium a mértékadó. Oligometastasisos betegen is elérhető a komplett hisztopatológiai remisszió. Komplett remisszió esetén felmerülhet a "watch and wait" taktika alkalmazása. Colontumorok reszekábilis májmetastasisainak kezelésében nem célszerű komplett remisszóra törekedni. Megfordítható a primer tumor és a metastasisok kezelési sorrendje. Az onkológiai kezelések egyre javuló eredményei alapján a sebészeti tevékenység visszaszorulása várható a daganatos betegek gyógyításában. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(14): 544-550. Summary. Oncology has evolved to a great extent over the last quarter of century. The significant success is multifactorial, including primary and secondary prevention, the development of diagnostics, new methods of chemo- and radiotherapy, and the integration of basic research results into practice. From the point of view of surgery, the establishing and widespread practical application of the principles of preoperative oncotherapy played a major role in this development. Between 1997 and 2005, 44 patients with gastric cancer and 102 patients with borderline resectable or irresectable esophageal cancer received perioperative treatment at the Department of Surgery of the University of Pécs. The response rate was above 50% in both groups and complete pathological remission was achieved in 3 patients with gastric cancer and 17 patients with esophageal cancer. Based on our own experience and literature data, the development of seven new principles in surgical oncology were observed as the result of a very successful preoperative oncologic treatment. The desired free resection margin was reduced to the millimeter dimension in many cancer cases. Thus so-called organ-preserving procedures were made possible. Regarding the prognosis, the stage after the treatment became determinant. Complete histopathological remission could also be achievable in patients with oligometastases. In the case of a complete remission, the "watch and wait" tactics emerged as an option. Along the preoperative treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastases, there is no need to strive for complete remission. The treatment order of the primary tumor and its metastases can be reversed. Based on the improving results of oncology treatments, a reduction in surgical activity in the treatment of cancer patients is expected. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(14): 544-550.

Outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinoma according to perioperative treatment strategy: a real-world, population-based study

Aim: To assess the survival outcomes of patients with nonmetastatic gastric cancer according to the type of perioperative treatment strategy used (surgery-only, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy) in a population-based setting. Materials & methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results research-plus database was explored, and patients with nonmetastatic gastric cancer who were treated with an oncologic surgery were reviewed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine the impact of treatment strategy on overall and cancer-specific survival. Results: A total of 11,526 patients were found to be eligible and they were included in the current analysis. Looking at the percentages of different treatment strategies throughout the study years (2006-2017), the use of the following strategies increased: adjuvant chemotherapy (20.1 vs 10.6%), and perioperative chemotherapy (21.3 vs 0.5%); while the use of the following strategies decreased: surgery only (36.2 vs 58.2%), and adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (22.4 vs 30.6%). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, the following factors were associated with worse overall survival: older age (hazard [HR]: 1.021; 95% CI: 1.018-1.023), males (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04-1.14), Black race (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04-1.19), cardia subsite (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17), grade 3-4 (HR:1.32; 95% CI: 1.25-1.40), diffuse histology (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.35-1.58), clinically node positive (HR:1.43; 95% CI: 1.34-1.53), total gastrectomy (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13-1.28), and surgery-only approach (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.55-1.75). Conclusion: Among patients with localized gastric cancer, patients who were treated with surgery-only, and to a less extent, patients who were treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy have worse survival outcomes; while those treated with perioperative chemotherapy have the best survival outcomes.

Current Treatment Strategies for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5-10% have interstitial pneumonia (IP) at the time of diagnosis. To avoid fatal acute exacerbations of pre-existing IP, appropriate patient selection and low-risk treatment choices are warranted. Risk factors for acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP with cytotoxic drugs include honeycomb lungs on computed tomography (CT) and low forced vital capacity, but risk factors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been fully investigated. For advanced or recurrent NSCLC with comorbid IP, carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is the standard of care for first-line treatment, but second-line or later treatment has not been established. ICI holds great promise for long-term survival, but many challenges remain, including safety and appropriate patient selection. Since the indications for pharmacotherapy and radiotherapy for NSCLC with comorbid IP are quite limited, surgical resection should be considered as much as possible for patients with operable stages. A scoring system has been reported to predict the risk of postoperative acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP, but perioperative treatment has not been established. In the future, it is necessary to accumulate more cases and conduct further research, not only in Japan but also worldwide.

Trastuzumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel as perioperative treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: A phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie Gastric Cancer Study Group

Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) is a mainstay in the treatment of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (EGA). Trastuzumab improved survival when added to chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic EGA. We investigated the combination of trastuzumab and FLOT as perioperative treatment in patients with locally advanced EGA. A multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of perioperative FLOT (24-hours 5-FU 2600 mg/m² , leucovorin 200 mg/m² , oxaliplatin 85 mg/mg² , docetaxel 50 mg/m² , trastuzumab 6 mg/kg then 4 mg/kg d1, repeated d15 for four cycles preoperatively and postoperatively followed by 9 cycles of trastuzumab monotherapy) in patients with HER-2 positive EGA. Patients had ≥cT2, any N, M0 EGA. The primary endpoint was the rate of centrally assessed pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints comprised disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, toxicity and surgical morbidity. Fifty-six evaluable patients (median age 62 years) were included; n = 40 had tumors originating from the esophagogastric junction; T stage was (cT2/3/4/unknown): 4/42/8/2; n = 50 patients had cN+ disease. Main adverse events grades 3-4: leukopenia (17.9%), neutropenia (46.6%) and diarrhea (17.0%). All patients underwent tumor resections. R0 resection rate was 92.9%. Eight patients had anastomotic leakage. One postoperative death occurred. pCR was found in 12 patients (21.4%) and a further n = 14 patients (25.0%) had near complete response. Median DFS was 42.5 months and the 3-year OS rate was 82.1%. The primary endpoint of achieving a pCR >20% was reached. No unexpected safety issues were observed. Survival data are promising.

Perioperative treatment compliance, anxiety and depression of elderly patients with ophthalmic surgery and the influential factors

BACKGROUND

Ophthalmic surgery is invasive, and treatment efficacy is affected by a variety of factors. We aimed to analyze perioperative treatment compliance, anxiety and depression of elderly patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery and the influential factors.

METHODS

The study group comprised 119 elderly patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery between March 2018 and March 2020. Clinical and treatment compliance data of all patients were collected. The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were administered to all patients, and logistic regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

During the perioperative period the 119 elderly patients had a mean SAS score of 65.13±14.36, and SDS score of 61.94±17.39. Treatment compliance was as follows: 76 cases of complete compliance, 25 of incomplete compliance, and 18 of complete non-compliance. Economic status, complications, treatment options and levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 are independent risk factors that affected the compliance of elderly patients undergoing ophthalmology surgery (P<0.05). Education level, marital status, economic status, complications, treatment options and levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 were independent risk factors affecting perioperative anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many factors affecting the perioperative treatment compliance, anxiety and depression of elderly patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery. Effective intervention measures should be taken to improve patients' compliance, reduce their negative emotions, and improve the surgical efficacy.

Surgical oncology in the age of multimodality therapy for cancer of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract

INTRODUCTION

To date, all efforts to fight gastrointestinal cancer, regardless of its origin and entity, have resulted in complex therapeutic regimens involving a combination of systemic therapy, radiation therapy and surgery. It is generally accepted across all disciplines that not one, but the combination and the proper timing of all modalities result in the best oncologic outcome.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we provide insight into the current and future value of multimodal therapeutic approaches for upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer. Various aspects of treatment as well as open questions regarding indication and timing of multimodal strategies are addressed in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

In order to further improve the survival and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal tumors in the future, scientifically proven multimodal therapy concepts are needed first and foremost. In addition, markers are pivotal to assign individual patients to a specific concept and to monitor the success of therapy. The main question is in which situation a neoadjuvant, perioperative or adjuvant radio-, chemo- or immunotherapy is superior. In fact, almost every curatively intended concept still contains surgical resection. Thus, improvement in surgical technique is also critical for multimodality concepts.

Long-Term Outcomes after Use of Perioperative Glucocorticoids in Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The surgical stress response can accelerate clinical metastasis formation. Perioperative glucocorticoids might modulate this response and the metastatic process. We aimed to describe associations between perioperative glucocorticoids and long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. We searched four databases for eligible trials and performed meta-analyses on frequency and time-to-event data. We included sixteen studies that evaluated eight different cancer types. No association was found between perioperative glucocorticoids and recurrence in either the frequency meta-analysis, risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.87-1.25), or in the time-to-event meta-analysis, hazard ratio (HR) 1.18, 95% CI (0.78-1.79). Increased 1-year overall survival, RR 0.70, 95% (0.51-0.97), and disease-free survival, RR 0.77, 95% CI (0.60-0.97), was found for the glucocorticoid group, but five years after surgery, overall survival was reduced for the glucocorticoid group, RR 1.64, 95% CI (1.00-2.71). An exploratory subgroup analysis revealed decreased overall survival, HR 1.78, 95% CI (1.57-2.03), for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery while receiving glucocorticoids. Perioperative glucocorticoids were not associated with recurrence after cancer surgery. We found neither beneficial or deleterious associations between glucocorticoids and overall survival or disease-free survival. The available evidence remains heterogenous; low in quality and amount; and cancer-specific at present.

Impact of perioperative treatment on survival of resectable gastric cancer patients after D2 lymphadenectomy: a single European centre propensity score matching analysis

Background To determine the effects of perioperative treatment of gastric cancer patients, we conducted an analysis with propensity score matched patient groups to determine the role of perioperative chemotherapy in patients after D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients and methods From our database of 1563 patients, 482 patients were selected with propensity score matching and divided into two balanced groups: 241 patients in the surgery only group and 241 patients in the perioperative group. The long-term results of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results Most of the included patients received radio-chemotherapy with capecitabine (n = 111; 46%) and perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, oxalliplatin and capecitabine (n = 91; 37.7%). 92.9% of the patients received a D2 lymph node dissection. Perioperative morbidity was similar between surgery only (18.3%) and perioperative treatment groups (20.7%) (p = 0.537). The perioperative mortality was not influenced by perioperative treatment. A pathological response was observed in 12.5% of patients. The overall 5-year and median survivals were significantly higher in the perioperative treatment group (50.5%; 51.7 moths) compared to surgery only group (41.8%; 34.9 months; p = 0.038). The subgroup analysis revealed that only patients with the TNM stages T3 (p = 0.028), N2 (p = 0.009), N3b (p = 0.043), and UICC stages IIIb (p = 0.003) and IIIc (p = 0.03) significantly benefit from perioperative treatment. Conclusions Perioperative treatment in radically resected gastric cancer patients after D2 lymphadenectomy was beneficial in stages IIIb and IIIc. The effects of perioperative treatment in lower stages could be negated by the effects of the radical surgery in lower stages and in higher stages by the biology of the disease.

Perioperative Treatment in Resectable Gastric Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth-most common cancer worldwide and an important cause of cancer-related-death. The growing knowledge of its molecular pathogenesis has shown that GC is not a single entity, but a constellation of different diseases, each with its own molecular and clinical characteristics. Currently, surgery represents the only curative approach for localized GC, but only 20% of patients (pts) showed resectable disease at diagnosis and, even in case of curative resection, the prognosis remains poor due to the high rate of disease relapse. In this context, multimodal perioperative approaches were developed in western and eastern countries in order to decrease relapse rates and improve survival. However, there is little consensus about the optimal treatment for non-metastatic GC. In this review, we summarize the current status and future developments of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable GC, attempting to find clear answers to the real problems in clinical practice.

A Rare Case of Giant Solid Hemangioblastoma Accompanied with Hemophilia Type A

The surgical removal of giant solid hemangioblastoma involves a high risk of perioperative bleeding and requires attentive hemostasis. Here, we present a case of a giant solid hemangioblastoma accompanied with hemophilia which was previously undiagnosed. A 35-year-old man without any past medical history was admitted with diplopia and ocular motility disorder. computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed obstructive hydrocephalus and a solid giant tumor of more than 4.0 cm in diameter in the right cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Hemangioblastoma was suspected on cerebral angiography. After ventriculoperitoneal shunt for obstructive hydrocephalus, oozing from the skin incision continued for several days. Hemophilia type A was diagnosed based on the result of laboratory blood coagulability examination. Supplemental administration of factor VIII and coil embolization of the feeding arteries of the lesion on the CPA were performed, and the tumor was subtotally resected without hemorrhagic complications. The histopathological diagnosis was hemangioblastoma. We report this case to emphasize the importance not to overlook previously undiagnosed coagulopathy before surgical excision of hemangioblastoma. And, with appropriate perioperative management for coagulopathy, surgical treatment involving a high risk of perioperative bleeding can be safely undertaken.

Perioperative treatments for resected upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative treatments have been used to improve prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, optimal management remains unestablished.

METHODS

We searched the Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for studies published before June 20, 2015. All included studies were categorised into three groups on the basis of the outcome reported (overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS)). Relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death were calculated using random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis methods. We also ranked the three different treatments in terms of three outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 31 trials with 8100 patients were included. Compared with the control, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) could improve OS, DSS and RFS by 32% (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.89), 29% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.89) and 51% (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-0.85), respectively. We noted a marked prolongation of RFS in both intravesical chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09-0.69) as well as concurrent radiotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03-0.97) than in the control. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) showed a significant improvement in DSS relative to the control (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06-0.61) and a distinct advantage over AC (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.08-0.90) or AR (HR 6.89, 95% CI 1.25-18.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that AC; intravesical chemotherapy; and concurrent radiotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of UTUC patients. NAC was found to be more favourable for UTUC than AC in terms of DSS.

Perioperative FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab for initially unresectable advanced colorectal cancer (NAVIGATE-CRC-01)

BACKGROUND

Perioperative chemotherapy combined with surgery for liver metastases is considered an active strategy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its impact on initially unresectable, previously untreated advanced CRC, regardless of concurrent metastases, remains to be clarified.

METHODS

A Phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of perioperative FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab for initially unresectable advanced CRC. Patients with previously untreated advanced colon or rectal cancer initially diagnosed as unresectable advanced CRC (TNM stage IIIb, IIIc, or IV) but potentially resectable after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were studied. Preoperatively, patients received six cycles of NAC (five cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab followed by one cycle of FOLFOX4 alone). The interval between the last dose of bevacizumab and surgery was at least 5 weeks. Six cycles of adjuvant FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab were given after surgery. The completion rate of NAC and feasibility of curative surgery were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

An interim analysis was performed at the end of NAC in the 12th patient to assess the completion rate of NAC. The median follow-up time was 56 months. The characteristics of the patients were as follows: sex, eight males and four females; tumor location, sigmoid colon in three, ascending colon in one, and rectum (above the peritoneal reflection) in eight; stage, III in eight and IV in four (liver or lymph nodes). All patients completed six cycles of NAC. There were no treatment-related severe adverse events or deaths. An objective response to NAC was achieved in nine patients (75%), and no disease progression was observed. Eleven patients underwent curative tumor resection, including metastatic lesions. In December 2012, this Phase II study was terminated because of slow registration.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab is well tolerated and has a promising response rate leading to curative surgery, which offers a survival benefit in initially unresectable advanced CRC with concurrent metastatic lesions.