Comparison of Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Outcomes Between Blood Collection Approaches: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

A systematic literature review was performed to understand the prevalence, advantages, and disadvantages of blood collection using different approaches (direct venipuncture or vascular access devices), and interventions used to mitigate the disadvantages.

METHODS

The review included a broad range of study designs and outcomes. Database searches (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination) were conducted in March 2021 and supplemented by hand searching.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one publications were included. The data indicate that blood sampling from vascular access devices is common in emergency departments, trauma centers, and intensive care units. Studies showed that hemolysis and sample contamination place a considerable economic burden on hospitals. Significant cost savings could be made through enforcing strict aseptic technique, or using the initial specimen diversion technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemolysis and sample contamination are far from inevitable in vascular access device-collected or venipuncture samples; both can be reduced through adherence to strict blood sampling protocols and utilization of the initial specimen diversion technique. Needle-free blood collection devices offer further hope for reducing hemolysis. No publication focused on the difficult venous access population; insertion success rates are likely to be lower (and the benefits of vascular access devices higher) in these patients.

Peripheral access size evaluation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND/AIM

Peripheral access vessel dimensions in the general patient population screened for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can offer insight into the indications for pre-TAVR computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment. We seek to determine peripheral access vessel sizes in patients screened for TAVR and association with patient characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis screened for TAVR at a high-volume center from April 2012 to March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, contrast-enhanced CTA was used to determine the minimal luminal diameters (MLDs) of the transfemoral access vessels, as measured between the inguinal ligament and the deep femoral artery for the femoral artery, and proximal to the inguinal ligament for the external and common iliac arteries, respectively. Paired and independent samples t-tests were used to compare means and regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with MLD.

RESULTS

A total of 1049 screened patients were included of which 826 (78.7%) underwent TAVR and 551 (52.5%) were male. The mean age was 80.6 (±9.6) years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.7 (±5.9) kg/m² . About 152 (14.5%) had peripheral vascular disease and 153 (14.6%) had chronic kidney disease. The mean (±2 standard deviations) MLDs of the right and left femoral arteries were 7.73 mm (4.68-10.78) and 7.68 mm (4.63-10.72), respectively. Male sex and BMI were associated with larger average femoral MLD while hyperlipidemia, hypertension, smoking, peripheral vascular disease, and coronary artery disease were inversely associated.

CONCLUSION

Most patients screened for TAVR have minimum peripheral access vessel sizes exceeding the recommended minimum access route diameters of modern transcatheter heart valves. As sheath sizes decrease, clinicians must carefully judge patient individual risk factors to determine whether a pre-TAVR CTA assessing peripheral access vessel dimensions and anatomical contraindications is indicated. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are required to compare the outcomes of TAVR with and without preoperative CTA.

The integrated short peripheral cannula: A new peripheral venous access device?

Short peripheral intravenous cannulas have different features, as they may be winged or non-winged, ported or non-ported, equipped or not with needle stick prevention and "blood stop" mechanisms, and integrated or not with preassembled extensions or preassembled needle free connector. In the current range of commercially available short peripheral cannulas, there is one device that is apparently associated with several clinical advantages. In fact, short peripheral cannulas with safety mechanisms, closed system, winged, non-ported, and equipped with preassembled extension and preassembled needle-free connector appear to be associated with prolonged dwell time, reduction of the incidence of several complications (infiltration/extravasation, dislodgement, phlebitis, infection, blood leakage), cost reduction, and increased satisfaction of patients and clinicians. To clarify the current terminology and to identify this device for future clinical studies, the authors advocate the use of the term "integrated short peripheral cannula." A rapid review of the current evidence suggests that this new device may have different clinical performance and different indications if compared to standard short peripheral cannulas. Though, the optimal clinical outcome can be achieved only when the device is inserted and maintained with proper protocols.

Is a 20 gauge fenestrated intravenous catheter non-inferior to a 18 gauge standard catheter for apheresis procedures? A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Peripheral venous access has been promoted as the safest, quickest, and most easily achievable route for performing apheresis procedures by the American Society for Apheresis' Choosing Wisely campaign. The current literature regarding catheter size and selection for both draw and return access is limited. Furthermore, the Infusion Nurses Society recommends using the smallest gauge catheter possible for the prescribed therapy in order to limit vein trauma and phlebitis. Since there is a lack of evidence to guide selection of catheter size for return access during therapeutic apheresis procedures (TAPs) for patients with chronic conditions, this pilot study seeks to compare the performance of a 20-gauge fenestrated (20G) catheter to a standard 18-gauge (18G) intravenous catheter.

METHODS

This non-inferiority pilot study randomized 26 subjects during 74 TAPs to either 20G fenestrated catheter or 18G standard catheter.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences for variables associated with the efficiency of the TAPs comparing 20G to 18G catheter for inlet rate (P = .8666), return pressure (P = .9427), blood processed (P = .4318), or total procedure time (P = .3184).

CONCLUSION

The results from this pilot study suggest that 20G fenestrated catheter is non-inferior to 18G standard catheters. Additional studies with increased power are warranted to confirm these findings.

Safety of peripheral administration of vasopressor medications: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Vasopressor medications have traditionally been administered via central venous catheters (CVCs), primarily due to concerns of peripheral extravasation of vasoconstrictive medications. Recent studies have suggested that vasopressor administration via peripheral intravenous catheters (PiVCs) may be a feasible and safe alternative. This systematic review evaluates the safety of delivering vasopressor medications via PiVCs.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to assess the frequency of complications associated with the delivery of vasopressors via PiVCs. A literature search for prospective and retrospective studies of vasopressor infusions in adults was performed. We included studies of continuous infusions of vasopressor medications (noradrenaline, adrenaline, metaraminol, phenylephrine, dopamine and vasopressin) delivered via a PiVCs that included at least 20 patients. Data on patient factors, cannulation approach, monitoring protocols, vasopressor dosing and dilutions and adverse events were collected and summarised.

RESULTS

Seven studies were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 1382 patients. No study fulfilled all of the validity criteria. Noradrenaline was the most commonly administered agent (n = 702 episodes of administration), followed by phenylephrine (n = 546), dopamine (n = 108), metaraminol (n = 74) and vasopressin and adrenaline (<5 patients). Mean duration of infusion was 22 h (95% confidence interval [CI] 8-36 h). Extravasation occurred in 3.4% (95% CI 2.5-4.7%) of patients. There were no reported episodes of tissue necrosis or limb ischaemia. All extravasation events were successfully managed conservatively or with vasodilatory medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Reports of the administration of vasopressors via PiVCs, when given for a limited duration, under close observation, suggest that extravasation is uncommon and is unlikely to lead to major complications.