Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Stressed Volume and Venous Return during Hyperdynamic Septic Shock

The present work investigated the dynamic changes in stressed volume (Vs) and other determinants of venous return using a porcine model of hyperdynamic septic shock. Septicemia was induced in 10 anesthetized swine, and fluid challenges were started after the diagnosis of sepsis-induced arterial hypotension and/or tissue hypoperfusion. Norepinephrine infusion targeting a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg was started after three consecutive fluid challenges. After septic shock was confirmed, norepinephrine infusion was discontinued, and the animals were left untreated until cardiac arrest occurred. Baseline Vs decreased by 7% for each mmHg decrease in MAP during progression of septic shock. Mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) analogue (Pmca), right atrial pressure, resistance to venous return, and efficiency of the heart decreased with time (p < 0.001 for all). Fluid challenges did not improve hemodynamics, but noradrenaline increased Vs from 107 mL to 257 mL (140%) and MAP from 45 mmHg to 66 mmHg (47%). Baseline Pmca and post-cardiac arrest Pmcf did not differ significantly (14.3 ± 1.23 mmHg vs. 14.75 ± 1.5 mmHg, p = 0.24), but the difference between pre-arrest Pmca and post-cardiac arrest Pmcf was statistically significant (9.5 ± 0.57 mmHg vs. 14.75 ± 1.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the baseline Vs decreased by 7% for each mmHg decrease in MAP during progression of hyperdynamic septic shock. Significant changes were also observed in other determinants of venous return. A new physiological intravascular volume existing at zero transmural distending pressure was identified, termed as the rest volume (Vr).

Periodicity, time constants of drainage, and the mechanical determinants of peak cardiac output during exercise

To analyze mechanical adaptations that must occur in the cardiovascular system to reach the high cardiac outputs known to occur at peak aerobic performance, we adapted a computational model of the circulation by adding a second parallel venous compartment as proposed by August Krogh in 1912. One venous compartment has a large compliance and slow time constant of emptying; it is representative of the splanchnic circulation. The other has a low compliance and fast time constant of emptying and is representative of muscle beds. Fractional distribution between the two compartments is an important determinant of cardiac output. Parameters in the model were based on values from animal and human studies normalized to a 70 kg male. The baseline cardiac output was set at 5 L/min, and we aimed for 25 L/min at peak exercise with a fractional flow to the peripheral-muscle region of 90%. Finally, we added the equivalent of a muscle pump. Adjustments in circuit and cardiac parameters alone increased cardiac output to only 15.6 L/min because volume accumulated in the muscle compartment and limited a higher cardiac output. Addition of muscle contractions decompressed the muscle region and allowed cardiac output to increase to 23.4 L/min. The pulsatility of blood flow imposes important constraints on the adaptations of cardiac and circulatory functions because it fixes the times for filling and emptying. Flow is further limited by the limits of cardiac filling on each beat. Muscle contractions play a key role by decompressing volume that would otherwise accumulate in the muscle vasculature and by decreasing the time for stroke return to the right ventricle.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a computational model of the circulation and previous human and animal data to model mechanical changes in the heart and circulation that are needed to reach the known high cardiac output at peak aerobic exercise. Key points are that time constants of drainage of circulatory compartments put limits on peak flow in a pulsatile system. Muscle contractions increase the rate of return to the heart and by doing so prevent accumulation of volume in the muscle compartment and greatly increase circulatory capacity.

Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation

Venous return, i.e., the blood flowing back to the heart, is driven by the pressure difference between mean systemic filling pressure and right atrial pressure (RAP). Besides cardiac function, it is the major determinant of cardiac output. Mean systemic filling pressure is a function of the vascular volume. The concept of venous return has a central role for heart lung interactions and the explanation of shock states. Mechanical ventilation during anaesthesia and critical illness may severely affect venous return by different mechanisms. In the first part of the following article, we will discuss the development of the concept of venous return, its specific components mean systemic and mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), RAP and resistance to venous return (RVR). We show how these pressures relate to the volume state of the circulation. Various interpretations and critiques are elucidated. In the second part, we focus on the impact of positive pressure ventilation on venous return and its components, including latest results from latest research.