Graph alignment exploiting the spatial organization improves the similarity of brain networks

Every brain is unique, having its structural and functional organization shaped by both genetic and environmental factors over the course of its development. Brain image studies tend to produce results by averaging across a group of subjects, under the common assumption that it is possible to subdivide the cortex into homogeneous areas while maintaining a correspondence across subjects. We investigate this assumption: can the structural properties of a specific region of an atlas be assumed to be the same across subjects? This question is addressed by looking at the network representation of the brain, with nodes corresponding to brain regions and edges to their structural relationships. Using an unsupervised graph matching strategy, we align the structural connectomes of a set of healthy subjects, considering parcellations of different granularity, to understand the connectivity misalignment between regions. First, we compare the obtained permutations with four different algorithm initializations: Spatial Adjacency, Identity, Barycenter, and Random. Our results suggest that applying an alignment strategy improves the similarity across subjects when the number of parcels is above 100 and when using Spatial Adjacency and Identity initialization (the most plausible priors). Second, we characterize the obtained permutations, revealing that the majority of permutations happens between neighbors parcels. Lastly, we study the spatial distribution of the permutations. By visualizing the results on the cortex, we observe no clear spatial patterns on the permutations and all the regions across the context are mostly permuted with first and second order neighbors.

Study the Longitudinal in vivo and Cross-Sectional ex vivo Brain Volume Difference for Disease Progression and Treatment Effect on Mouse Model of Tauopathy Using Automated MRI Structural Parcellation

Brain volume measurements extracted from structural MRI data sets are a widely accepted neuroimaging biomarker to study mouse models of neurodegeneration. Whether to acquire and analyze data in vivo or ex vivo is a crucial decision during the phase of experimental designs, as well as data analysis. In this work, we extracted the brain structures for both longitudinal in vivo and single-time-point ex vivo MRI acquired from the same animals using accurate automatic multi-atlas structural parcellation, and compared the corresponding statistical and classification analysis. We found that most gray matter structures volumes decrease from in vivo to ex vivo, while most white matter structures volume increase. The level of structural volume change also varies between different genetic strains and treatment. In addition, we showed superior statistical and classification power of ex vivo data compared to the in vivo data, even after resampled to the same level of resolution. We further demonstrated that the classification power of the in vivo data can be improved by incorporating longitudinal information, which is not possible for ex vivo data. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates the tissue-specific changes, as well as the difference in statistical and classification power, between the volumetric analysis based on the in vivo and ex vivo structural MRI data. Our results emphasize the importance of longitudinal analysis for in vivo data analysis.