Successful protocol of anaesthesia for measuring transepithelial nasal potential difference in spontaneously breathing mice

Numerous difficulties arise during in vivo measurements of transepithelial nasal potential difference (PD) in mice, such as inadequate duration and depth of anaesthesia, bronchoaspiration of solutions perfused in the nose, and respiratory and/or cardiovascular depression.

Anaesthesia was induced in adult C57 mice with intraperitoneal injection of a combination of fentanyl, droperidol and medetomidine, each of these at either a small dose (0.20, 10 and 0.33 mg/kg, respectively) or at a large dose (0.40, 20 and 0.40 mg/kg, respectively), combined with a fixed dose of 0.375 μg clonidine. In order to establish a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationship, blood concentrations of the first three drugs were measured in 24 animals by liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. At the end of the experiment, naloxone, a competitive morphinic antagonist, and atipamezole, an α-2 adrenergic antagonist, were administered. Bronchoaspiration was prevented by tilting the animal head downwards and by absorbing the excess fluid from the opposite nostril and from the oral cavity. Optimal assessment of anaesthesia associated with regular respiration, loss of blink, pupillary and pedal withdrawal reflexes was obtained with doses of fentanyl, droperidol and medetomidine corresponding to 0.20, 20 and 0.40 mg/kg, respectively. Blood concentrations of fentanyl around 17 ng/mL induced loss of respiratory efforts and were followed by death during the experiment. Integrity of ion transport was demonstrated under continuous perfusion by successive depolarization after amiloride and repolarization after chloride-free solution.

The combination investigated in this study lead to adequate surgical anaesthesia (stage III, plane 2) for prolonged nasal PD measurements in spontaneously breathing mice.

The use of skin needling for the delivery of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics

AIM

The use of skin needling is believed to aid the transdermal delivery of drugs, even if it is mostly used for skin collagen induction. The aim of this paper was to use skin needling, combined with a local anesthetic EMLA (eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine), as a way to enhance transdermal drug penetration and optimize the analgesic effects of common local anesthesia.

METHODS

We recruited 15 patients. For each patient of our study we defined a skin area of 3 cm2 from two forearms: on one side, we used skin needling first and immediately thereafter applied the EMLA in occlusion for 60 minutes; on the other one, we only applied EMLA in occlusion for 60 minutes. Then, pain was induced in each patient's forearm by introducing a 27 G needle into the skin 4 mm deep three times. Lastly, pain sensation measures were registered and a middle value was calculated.

RESULTS

When skin needling is used in conjunction with EMLA applied in occlusion for 60 minutes on skin forearms, the level of pain sensation registered was significantly reduced on a Visual Analogue Scale compared to the application of EMLA alone.

CONCLUSION

The use of skin needling can improve the transdermal delivery of an emulsion-like eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and can introduce the use of this method for delivering topical molecules in dermatology.

Topical lidocaine enhanced by laser pretreatment: a safe and effective method of analgesia for facial rejuvenation

BACKGROUND

Injectable forms of anesthesia for nonsurgical facial rejuvenation, although efficacious, are uncomfortable for the patient. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that laser pretreatment at low energies enhances absorption of topical lidocaine.

OBJECTIVES

The authors assess the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted transdermal delivery of topical anesthetic.

METHOD

Ten patients were split into 2 groups (A and B). All patients received 15 g of BLT (20% benzocaine, 6% lidocaine, and 4% tetracaine triple anesthetic cream) for 20 minutes with no occlusion. Then the cream was removed and the first blood draw taken. Group A patients were pretreated with the full ablative laser and group B patients with a fractional ablative laser to the full face. A further 15 g BLT was applied for another 20 minutes. Group A patients then underwent full ablative laser treatment, and group B received fractionated ablative laser treatment. Blood draws were taken at 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the initial topical anesthetic application, and the serum was analyzed for lidocaine and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) levels. Patients were asked to rate the pain felt at intervals during the procedure.

RESULTS

No patient required supplemental nerve blocks. Pain scores were equivalent at the end of the first pass for both groups (P = .436). Group A patients had significantly lower pain scores at the start of the second laser treatment (P = .045), but pain scores became equivalent by the end (P = .323). Combined serum lidocaine and MEGX levels were significantly higher in group A patients up to 90 minutes (peak average of 0.61 µg/mL for group A and 0.533 µg/mL for group B; P = .0253), which corresponded to greater initial analgesic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this study demonstrate that topical anesthetic for facial rejuvenation can be enhanced with laser pretreatment while maintaining safe blood serum levels. Further studies should examine optimal application amount and time to allow safe multipass facial rejuvenation without the need for invasive nerve blocks.

[Effect of remifentanil on propofol pharmacokinetics with target controlled infusion in elderly patients]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of remifentanil administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI) with different plasma concentration and time on pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly patients.

METHODS

Thirty-two ASA I-II patients (65-82 years old) undergoing elective lower abdominal operations were divided into 4 groups randomly: TCI propofol combined with epidural block (group A, n=8); TCI remifentanil with plasma concentration 4 μg/L and propofol (group B, n=8); TCI remifentanil with plasma concentration 7 μg/L and propofol (group C, n=8); and TCI propofol and remifentanil (plasma concentration 4 μg/L) with infusion time longer than 4 hours (group D, n=8). Propofol was infused by target-controlled infusion with plasma concentration 3 mg/L in the 4 groups. bispetral index (BIS), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) were recorded during operation. Blood samples were collection from radial arterial catheter. Samples of 2 mL of arterial blood were taken at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30 min and then every 30 min after the start of the infusion of propofol, and at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 240, 360, 480, 720, 1440 min after the termination of the infusion of propofol. Propofol concentrations in blood were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The pharmacokinetics analyses were performed using the nonlinear mixed-effects model approach implemented in NONMEM computer program. After obtaining the best NONMEM model with covariates, the influence of coadministered remifentanil on the model was examined.

RESULTS

In all the patients, the depth of anesthesia was enough (BIS value=40-60), and the circulatory system function was stable during operation. The final model of propofol pharmacokinetics in the three groups (A+B, A+C, and A+D groups) was best described by a three-compartment mammillary model. The values of objective function (OFV) were -810.1, -714.4, and -896.4. Addition of remifentanil covariate effects to the final model resulted in no improvement in the objective function.

CONCLUSION

target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with different plasma concentration of remifentanil or remifentanil infusing more than 4 hours had no effect on pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly patients.

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine administration in Shetland ponies sedated with xylazine

The pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after administration of intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine (R-/S-ketamine; 2.2 mg/kg) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg/kg) to five ponies sedated with IV xylazine (1.1mg/kg) were compared. The time intervals to assume sternal and standing positions were recorded. Arterial blood samples were collected before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 13 min after ketamine administration. Arterial blood gases were evaluated 5 min after ketamine injection. Plasma concentrations of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers were determined by capillary electrophoresis and were evaluated by non-linear least square regression analysis applying a monocompartmental model. The first-order elimination rate constant was significantly higher and elimination half-life and mean residence time were lower for S-ketamine after S-ketamine compared to R-/S-ketamine administration. The maximum concentration of S-norketamine was higher after S-ketamine administration. Time to standing position was significantly diminished after S-ketamine compared to R-/S-ketamine. Blood gases showed low-degree hypoxaemia and hypercarbia.

Percutaneous penetration kinetics of lidocaine and prilocaine in two local anesthetic formulations assessed by in vivo microdialysis in pigs

The aim of this study was to characterize and compare the percutaneous penetration kinetics of lidocaine (L) and prilocaine (P) in two local anesthetic formulations by in vivo microdialysis coupled with HPLC. The microdialysis system for studying lidocaine and prilocaine was calibrated by a no-net-flux method in vitro and retrodialysis method in vivo, respectively. A dosage of 0.2 g/cm2 of an in-house P-L formulation (2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, methylcellulose-based) and commercially available Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthesia (EMLA, 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, carbopol-based) was separately but symmetrically applied in the dorsal region of pigs. Saline (0.9%, w/v) was perfused into the linear microdialysis probe at a flow rate of 1.5 microl/min. Dialysate was collected upon topical application up to 6 h at 20-min intervals and assessed by HPLC. The results demonstrated the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-6 h)) of lidocaine and prilocaine in EMLA was 71.95+/-23.36 microg h/ml and 38.01+/-14.8 microg h/ml, respectively, in comparison to 167.11+/-56.12 microg h/ml and 87.02+/-30.38 microg h/ml in the P-L formulation. The maximal concentrations (Cmax) of lidocaine and prilocaine in the dermis were 29.2+/-9.08 microg/ml and 16.54+/-5.31 microg/ml in EMLA and 80.93+/-17.98 microg/ml and 43.69+/-12.87 microg/ml in the P-L formulation, respectively. This study indicates a well-calibrated microdialysis system can provide vital real-time information on percutaneous drug delivery and specifically a methylcellulose-based P-L formulation can increase percutaneous absorption of both lidocaine and prilocaine in pigs compared to carbopol-based EMLA.

The performance of a target-controlled infusion of propofol in combination with remifentanil: a clinical investigation with two propofol formulations

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) incorporates the pharmacokinetic variables of an IV drug to facilitate safe and reliable administration. In this clinical study we investigated the performance of propofol TCI in combination with remifentanil. Fifty-four adult patients scheduled for general surgery lasting longer than 1 h received a combined TCI of propofol (Marsh parameter set; propofol randomly either dissolved with long- or middle-/long-chain triglycerides) and remifentanil. Arterial propofol plasma concentrations and hemodynamic and derived electroencephalogram variables were determined at various stages before, during, and after surgery. Measured propofol plasma concentrations exceeded the predicted values by 59%, and 48% when recalculated with the Schnider parameter set. Pharmacokinetic population analysis showed a small central volume of distribution (3.55 L) and reduced clearance (1.31 L/min) for propofol. ASA status and sex were the only variables that had a significant influence on propofol pharmacokinetics. In a second step, a new pharmacokinetic variable set for propofol was determined in the first 27 patients. Post hoc performance analysis of the remaining 27 patients showed improved accuracy using the new variable set. Our results show that when remifentanil and propofol are combined, the Marsh and Schnider parameter sets systematically underestimate propofol plasma concentrations. Presented, in part, at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Anesthesiologists, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 1, 1999, and the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Dallas, Texas, October 12, 1999.

The use and assessment of ketamine–medetomidine–butorphanol combinations for field anaesthesia in wild European badgers (Meles meles)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of four ketamine-based anaesthetics in badgers using a quantitative anaesthesia assessment technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized 'blinded' experimental trial.

METHODS

The quality of induction, of anaesthesia (at 5-minute intervals) and of recovery were assessed in 93 badgers, given either one of three ketamine (K)-medetomidine (M)-butorphanol (B) combinations: group A - M K B at 20/40/80 microg kg(-1); group B - M K B at 20/40/60 microg kg(-1); and group C - M K B at 20/60/40 microg kg(-1), or ketamine (K) alone at 2 mg kg(-1) (group D). The assessor was ignorant of the combination administered. Physiological variables (heart and respiratory rates and rectal temperature) were measured at 5-minute intervals during anaesthesia. Gingival mucus membrane colour was also recorded.

RESULTS

Induction to anaesthesia was most rapid with ketamine (2 mg kg(-1)) although induction quality did not differ between techniques. Ketamine used alone gave the poorest score for anaesthesia quality. Heart rate (HR) and scores for gingival mucus membrane colour were higher in animals anaesthetized with ketamine alone. Rectal temperature did not differ significantly between the techniques at any time during anaesthesia. Ketamine used alone produced the poorest quality of recovery.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The M-K-B combinations investigated overcame several side effects associated with ketamine anaesthesia, but at the expense of more variable induction times, lower HRs, and poorer mucus membrane coloration.

[Target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol in elderly patients]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical reliability and feasibility of target-controlled infusion (TCI) with different plasma concentration remifentanil and propofol.

METHODS

Thirty ASA I-II patients, > or =65 years old, undergoing selective lower abdominal operation were divided into 3 groups, group A with anesthesia using propofol combined with epidural block, group B with anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil (plasma concentration 4 microg/L), group C with anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil (plasma concentration 7 microg/L). BIS value, heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate variability and so on, were recorded during anesthesia and operation. Radial arterial blood samples for analysis of plasma concentration of propofol were taken during operation.

RESULTS

(1) The intubation response of groups B and C was lower than that of group A . (2) The depth of anesthesia was enough during operation (BIS value=45-60). (3) TCI propofol combined with remifentanil didn't lengthen the awaking time of patients; (4) MDPE of target-controlled infusion using propofol with Marsh parameters was 11.17%, MDAPE was 12.16% in Chinese elderly patients.

CONCLUSION

Remifentanil with plasma concentration of 4 and 7 microg/L combined with propofol could be safely used during clinical anesthesia of old patient, but monitoring must be strengthened during induction when plasma concentration of remifentanil was 7 microg/L. TCI propofol with Marsh parameters could be applied to Chinese elderly patients safely and efficiently.

Isocapnic hyperpnoea accelerates recovery from isoflurane anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Hyperventilation should speed up elimination of volatile anaesthetic agents from the body, but hyperventilation usually results in hypocapnia. We compared recovery from isoflurane anaesthesia in patients allowed to recover with assisted spontaneous ventilation (control) and those treated with isocapnic hyperpnoea.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were studied after approximately 1 h of anaesthesia with isoflurane. Control patients were allowed to recover in the routine way. Isocapnic hyperpnoea patients received 2-3 times their intraoperative ventilation using a system to maintain end tidal PCO(2) at 45-50 mm Hg. We measured time to removal of the airway and rate of change of bispectral index (BIS) during recovery.

RESULTS

With isocapnic hyperpnoea, the time to removal of the airway was markedly less (median and interquartile range values of 3.6 (2.7-3.7) vs 12.1 (6.8-17.2) min, P<0.001); mean (SD) BIS slopes during recovery were 11.8 (4.4) vs 4.3 (2.7) min(-1) (P<0.01) for isocapnic hyperpnoea and control groups, respectively. Isocapnic hyperpnoea was easily applied in the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

Isocapnic hyperpnoea at the end of surgery results in shorter and less variable time to removal of the airway after anaesthesia with isoflurane and nitrous oxide.

Use of a combination of propofol and fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil for total intravenous anesthesia in cats

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cardiorespiratory effects of an i.v. infusion of propofol alone or in association with fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil in cats and, for each combination, the minimal infusion rate of propofol that would inhibit a response to noxious stimuli.

DESIGN

Randomized crossover study.

ANIMALS

6 cats.

PROCEDURE

Cats were anesthetized 4 times in random order. After i.v. administration of fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil, or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution, anesthesia was induced with propofol (7 mg/kg 13.2 mg/lb], i.v.) and maintained for 90 minutes with a continuous infusion of propofol in conjunction with fentanyl (0.1 microg/kg/min [0.045 microg/lb/min]), alfentanil (0.5 microg/kg/min [0.23 microg/lb/min]), sufentanil (0.01 microg/kg/min [0.004 microg/lb/min]), or saline solution (0.08 mL/kg/min [0.036 mL/lb/min]).

RESULTS

Minimal infusion rate of propofol required to prevent a response to a noxious stimulus was higher when cats received saline solution. After 70 minutes, minimal infusion rate of propofol was significantly higher with fentanyl than with sufentanil. Decreases in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rectal temperature, and respiratory rate were detected with all treatments. Oxygen saturation did not change significantly, but end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide increased with all treatments. There were no significant differences in recovery times or sedation and recovery scores among treatments.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggest that infusion of propofol in combination with fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil results in satisfactory anesthesia in cats.

Propofol versus midazolam plus meperidine for sedation during ambulatory esophagogastroduodenoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol and meperidine plus midazolam for sedation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in children.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively and retrospectively from neurologically intact children (0.2-17.7 years of age) who underwent ambulatory diagnostic EGD during a 4-year period. Data were included from 155 consecutive patients receiving propofol with or without premedication with midazolam (PM group). One hundred five consecutive patients who received sedation with a midazolam plus meperidine combination served as a comparison (MM group). Outcome variables were: time required for induction of sedation, length of procedure, time for recovery, need for additional supportive measures, and need for physical restraint.

RESULTS

The onset of sedation was faster and the length of procedure and recovery were significantly shorter in the PM group as compared with the MM group (P < 0.01). Patients in the MM group required restraint more often than in the PM group. A higher dose of meperidine and midazolam was used in the prospective study. This led to deeper sedation but increased need for additional support.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol is safe and effective for facilitating EGD in children.

Predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion of remifentanil during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

The predictive performance of the available pharmacokinetic parameter sets for remifentanil, when used for target-controlled infusion (TCI) during total i.v. anaesthesia, has not been determined in a clinical setting. We studied the predictive performance of five parameter sets of remifentanil when used for TCI of remifentanil during propofol anaesthesia in surgical patients.

METHODS

Remifentanil concentration-time data that had been collected during a previous pharmacodynamic interaction study in 30 female patients (ASA physical status I, aged 20-65 yr) who received a TCI of remifentanil and propofol during lower abdominal surgery were used in this evaluation. The remifentanil concentrations predicted by the five parameter sets were calculated on the basis of the TCI device record of the infusion rate-time profile that had actually been administered to each individual. The individual and pooled bias [median performance error (MDPE)], inaccuracy [median absolute performance error (MDAPE)], divergence and wobble of the remifentanil TCI device were determined from the pooled and intrasubject performance errors.

RESULTS

A total of 444 remifentanil blood samples were analysed. Blood propofol and remifentanil concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 11 micro g ml(-1) and 0.1 to 19.6 ng ml(-1) respectively. Pooled MDPE and MDAPE of the remifentanil TCI device were -15 and 20% for the parameter set of Minto and colleagues (Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 10-23), 1 and 21%, -6 and 21%, and -6 and 19% for the three parameter sets described by Egan and colleagues (Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 821-33, Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 881-92, Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 562-73), and -24 and 30% for the parameter set described by Drover and Lemmens (Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 869-77).

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil can be administered by TCI with acceptable bias and inaccuracy. The three pharmacokinetic parameter sets described by Egan and colleagues resulted in the least bias and best accuracy.

Concurrent ketamine and alfentanil administration: pharmacokinetic considerations

BACKGROUND

A ketamine-alfentanil combination has been suggested for total i.v. anaesthesia. We determined the pharmacokinetics of ketamine and alfentanil, alone and together, in three groups of adult male rats, to assess any pharmacokinetic interaction.

METHODS

Group 1 animals were infused with i.v. ketamine for 5 min; in group 2, constant low plasma concentrations of alfentanil were maintained by computer-controlled infusion; in group 3, the treatments were combined. Serial plasma and terminal tissue concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

In the presence of alfentanil, the mean plasma ketamine concentration-time area under the curve (AUC) value was significantly lower (by 13%, P<0.05), while clearance (CIT) and volume of distribution (Vss) were significantly higher (by 16 and 28%, respectively, both P<0.05). Tissue:plasma distribution coefficients for ketamine in the presence of alfentanil were significantly higher in forebrain (by 128%, P<0.005), hindbrain (by 207%, P<0.01), gut (by 254%, P<0.005), and fat (by 344%, P<0.0001). Mean AUC values for alfentanil did not differ significantly in the presence of ketamine, but alfentanil tissue concentrations were significantly lower in forebrain (by 77%, P<0.0001), hindbrain (by 28%, P<0.01), heart (by 33%, P<0.01), lung (30%, P<0.05), and gut (by 21%, P<0.05). Corresponding tissue:plasma distribution coefficients were significantly lower for forebrain (by 69%, P<0.0001) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that the distribution of ketamine into the brain was increased by low plasma concentrations of alfentanil could have important clinical applications for pain management.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of EMLA in the treatment of postburn pruritus in pediatric patients: a pilot study

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) used to ameliorate postburn pruritus after application onto newly formed, intact skin in children. EMLA was applied once to an itchy site where healed skin had formed. Serial blood samples were collected to measure lidocaine, prilocaine, o-toluidine, and methemoglobin. Maximal plasma concentration, minimal plasma concentration, time to achieve the maximal plasma concentration, elimination half-life, and area under the concentration-time curve were calculated. Vital signs, oxygen saturation, clinical signs of hypoxia, and itch intensity were measured. Five children had 15.7 +/- 2.54 g (+/- SD) of EMLA applied to a skin surface area of 93.0 +/- 37.0 cm2. Lidocaine and prilocaine concentrations were below toxic levels; o-toluidine was not detected. Methemoglobin remained between 1 and 3%; patients did not exhibit any clinical signs of hypoxia. Mean oxygen saturation was 98.9 +/- 0.01%. The mean number of pruritic episodes and antihistamine breakthrough doses were greater in the 2 prestudy control days compared with study day 3 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Skin at the site of EMLA application remained anesthetized for 12 to 13 hours. In this small pilot study, EMLA seems to be a safe, novel treatment for postburn pruritus in burned children when applied to newly healed, intact skin.

Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam during cardiac surgery: assessment of the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prospective predictive accuracy and the quality of anesthesia of pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam designed to establish and maintain a plasma level of drug during cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis.

SETTING

Operating room at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty adult patients younger than 75 years old scheduled for valvular or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were anesthetized using a variable predicted concentration of sufentanil (1 to 10 ng/mL) combined with a stable predicted concentration of midazolam (100 ng/mL).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each patient, arterial samples were taken before (6 samples), during (2 samples), and after (2 samples) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Plasma sufentanil and midazolam concentrations were measured by specific radioimmunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography techniques. Predicted sufentanil and midazolam concentrations were derived using the data sets of Gepts et al and Maitre et al. The predictive performance, the percentage prediction error (PE), and the absolute percentage error were calculated for each sample. The bias, inaccuracy, and dispersion were assessed by determining the median of the individual medians of the prediction errors (MDPE), the median of the individual median of the absolute prediction errors (MDAPE), and the 10th and 90th percentiles of PE. For midazolam, the inaccuracy was low (MDAPE < 21%), but CPB was associated with a dilution of the measured concentration associated with a negative bias. For sufentanil, the inaccuracy was also low before CPB (MDAPE = 18%) but increased during and after CPB (MDAPE > 40%). During the whole procedure, the hemodynamic control necessitated only a few interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of sufentanil and midazolam using the pharmacokinetic sets of Gepts et al and Maitre et al is a safe and accurate anesthetic technique before CPB in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery when high sufentanil (1 to 10 ng/mL) and low midazolam (100 ng/mL) predicted plasma concentrations are targeted.

Propofol-thiopentone admixture-hypnotic dose, pain on injection and effect on blood pressure

This study examined some pharmacodynamic characteristics of two admixtures of propofol and thiopentone. Ninety unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients were group-randomized to receive, in a double-blinded manner, one of the following mixtures for induction of anaesthesia: Group P50: propofol 1% 10 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 10 ml; Group P75: propofol 1% 15 ml/thiopentone 2.5% 5 ml; Group P100: propofol 1% 20 ml/lignocaine 1% 4 ml. An additional 30 randomized but unblinded patients from the same patient cohort received thiopentone 2.5% to provide predictive dose data for groups P50 and P75. Haemodynamic data were collected pre- and post-induction. The required induction dose of both mixtures of propofol and thiopentone found an additive rather than a synergistic interaction with no significant difference between predicted and observed dose. Thiopentone resulted in significantly more rapid induction of anaesthesia than propofol/lignocaine or propofol/thiopentone. The addition of thiopentone to propofol was found to be as efficacious as the mixing of lignocaine with propofol in reducing pain on injection. The fall in systolic blood pressure was significantly less in group P50 compared with groups P75 or P100. Admixture of thiopentone with propofol results in an additive hypnotic effect, a reduction in pain of injection (comparable with addition of lignocaine) and a reduced hypotensive response compared to propofol injection alone during induction.

Safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream application four times a day in premature neonates: a pilot study

Although safety is established for lidocaine-prilocaine cream application to the heel once a day in neonates, it is often necessary to repeat heel lances several times a day in the clinical situation. A pilot safety study applying 0.5 g lidocaine-prilocaine cream to the heel covering an area of 5 cm2 with an occlusive dressing during 30 min four times a day was carried out. Twelve neonates (5 male, 7 female) with a gestational age of 30.1-36.3 weeks (mean 31.6 weeks) and a birth weight of 1100-2910 g (mean 1665 g) were enclosed. To establish safety, methaemoglobin levels and plasma concentrations of lidocaine, prilocaine and o-toluidine were measured until 24 h after the final application. Methaemoglobin levels were no different from baseline measurements, ranging from 0.2-1.1% and 0.1-0.7% respectively. Plasma concentrations of lidocaine and prilocaine were very low, maxima at 0.230 and 0.223 mg/l respectively. Plasma o-toluidine concentrations remained below the detection limit (0.025 mg/l).

CONCLUSION

Application of 0.5 g lidocaine-prilocaine cream to the heel under occlusion four times a day during 30 min is safe in preterm neonates. Establishing safety by measuring the methaemoglobin level by daily application is recommended.

Concentration and second-gas effects in the water analogue

The water analogue provides a visual model of the process of anaesthetic exchange. In the standard version, a single pipe connects the mouth container to the lung container and the conductance of this mouth-lung pipe is proportional to alveolar ventilation. This implies that inspired and expired ventilations are equal. In fact, with high inspired concentrations of nitrous oxide, early rapid uptake of gas by solution leads to a substantial difference between inspired and expired ventilation which in turn leads to concentration and second-gas effects. It is shown that by representing inspired and expired ventilations separately, and keeping one of them constant while varying the other to compensate for rapid uptake, concentration and second-gas effects are reproduced in the water analogue. Other means of reproducing the effects are reported but we believe that the first method is the most realistic and the most appropriate for teaching.

I.v. fentanyl decreases the clearance of midazolam

We have examined the effect of fentanyl on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Thirty patients were allocated randomly to receive fentanyl 200 micrograms and midazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 (fentanyl group, n = 15) or placebo and midazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 (placebo group, n = 15) in a double-blind manner for induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Systemic clearance of midazolam was decreased by 30% (P = 0.002) and elimination half-time was prolonged by 50% (P = 0.04) in the fentanyl group compared with the placebo group. There were no differences in the distribution half-time or volume of distribution at steady state between the two groups. These findings indicate that elimination of midazolam was inhibited by fentanyl during general anaesthesia.

Anesthetic interactions following bolus injections

The article presents two main principles of anesthetic interactions: (1) In contrast to the interactions of inhalational anesthetics (when deviations from additivity are debatable), profound synergistic and antagonistic anesthetic interactions between different classes of intravenous drugs are possible due to the difference in the mechanism of their action, (2) A combination of intravenous anesthetics may provide different outcomes (addition, synergism, or antagonism) regarding different components of anesthesia (eg, unconsciousness or movement to noxious stimulation) because the components, even if induced by one anesthetic drug, have different underlying mechanisms.

Pharmacokinetics of EMLA cream 5% application to oral mucosa

Plasma concentrations of lidocaine and prilocaine were measured following the application of a 5% eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) topical anesthetic cream to the oral mucosa of twelve subjects. For each subject, a total of 8 g of EMLA was occluded to 18 cm2 of buccal mucosa for 30 min. Analysis was carried out by high-pressure liquid chromatography, and results showed peak concentrations at 40 min for lidocaine and prilocaine. The maximum concentration measured in any subject was 418 ng/ml for lidocaine and 223 ng/ml for prilocaine, well below known toxic levels. No adverse local effects were observed from a 30-min application of EMLA. A follow-up pilot study assessing the clinical efficacy of EMLA for achieving sufficient analgesia for restorative procedures showed that the cream was successful in 75% of subjects tested.

Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine with epinephrine in piglets following epidural anaesthesia

The time course of arterial plasma lidocaine concentration, following an epidural anaesthesia via the sacrococcygeal or the S4-S5 trans-sacral approach, was studied in nine healthy piglets (7.8 +/- 1.3 weeks). Plasma lidocaine concentrations were measured for up to six hours after administration (5 mg/kg). Peak plasma concentration was 1.83 +/- 0.17 mg/l. Pharmacokinetic parameters determined from an independent compartment model were not different from those observed after an epidural administration of lidocaine via the sacrococcygeal space in children, except for a wide variability in the time taken to reach the maximum concentration (27.3 +/- 7.4 min) and a shorter half-life of elimination (82.8 +/- 7.0 min). The total body clearance of lidocaine was similar in piglets (17.3 +/- 1.6 ml/min/kg) to that in children. The shorter half-life of elimination was therefore attributed to a smaller volume of distribution in piglets (2.0 +/- 0.2 l/kg).