Can we improve time to patency with vasoepididymostomy with an innovative epididymal occlusion stitch?

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive azoospermia occurs when there is a blockage in the male reproductive tract, leading to a complete absence of sperm in the ejaculate. It constitutes around 40% of all cases of azoospermia (1, 2). Blockages in the male reproductive tract can arise from either congenital or acquired factors, affecting various segments such as the epididymis, vas deferens, and ejaculatory ducts (3). Examples of congenital causes encompass conditions like congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and unexplained epididymal blockages (4). Acquired instances of obstructive azoospermia may result from factors like vasectomy, infections, trauma, or unintentional injuries caused by medical procedures (5). This complex condition affecting male fertility, presents two main treatment options: microsurgical reconstruction and surgical extraction of sperm followed by in vitro fertilization (IVF). Microsurgical reconstruction proves to be the most cost-effective option for treating obstructive azoospermia when compared with assisted reproductive techniques (6, 7). However, success rates of reconstruction defined by patency are as high as 99% for vasovasostomy (VV) but decline to around 65% if vasoepididymostomy (VE) is required (8, 9). Thus, continued refinement in technique is necessary in order to attempt to improve patency for patients undergoing VE. In this video, we show a comprehensive demonstration of microsurgical VE, highlighting the innovative epididymal occlusion stitch. The goal of this innovative surgical technique is to improve outcomes for VE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patient is a 39-year-old male diagnosed with obstructive azoospermia who presents for surgical reconstruction via VE. His partner is a 37-years-old female with regular menstrual cycles. The comprehensive clinical data encompasses a range of factors, including FSH levels, results from semen analysis, and outcomes from testicular sperm aspiration. This thorough exploration aims to provide a thorough understanding of our innovative surgical technique and its application in addressing complex cases of obstructive azoospermia.

RESULTS

The procedure was started on the right, the vas deferens was identified and transected. The abdominal side of the vas was intubated and a vasogram performed, there was no obstruction. There was no fluid visible from the testicular side of the vas for analysis, thus we proceeded with VE. Upon inspection of the epididymis dilated tubules were identified. After selecting a tubule for VE, two 10-0 nylon sutures were placed, and it was incised. Upon inspection of the fluid motile sperm was identified. After VE, we performed a novel epididymal occlusion stitch technique. This was completed distal to the anastomosis by placing a 7-0 prolene through the tunica of the epididymis from the medial to lateral side. This stitch was then tightened down with the goal to largely occlude the epididymis so that sperm will preferentially travel through the anastomosis. The steps were then repeated on the left. At 3-month follow up, the patient had no change in testicular size as compared with preoperative size (18cc), he had no testicular or incisional discomfort, and on semen analysis he had presence of motile sperm. After 3 months post-surgery, the patient had motile sperm seen on semen analysis.

DISCUSSION

The introduction of a novel epididymal occlusion stitch demonstrates a targeted strategy to enhance the success of microscopic VE. Encouragingly, a 3-month post-surgery follow-up reveals the presence of motile sperm, reinforcing the potential efficacy of our approach. This is promising given the historical lower patency, delayed time to patency, and higher delayed failure rates that patients who require VE experience (10). In total, 40% of all azoospermia cases can be attributed to obstruction. The conventional treatments for obstructive azoospermia involve microsurgical reconstruction and surgical sperm retrieval followed by IVF. While microsurgical reconstruction has proven to be economically viable, the quest for enhanced success rates has led to the exploration of innovative techniques. Historically, the evolution of VV and VE procedures, initially performed in the early 20th century, laid the foundation for contemporary microsurgical approaches (11). Notably, the microscopic VV demonstrated significant improvements in patency rates and natural pregnancy likelihood, as evidenced by the seminal Vasovastomy Study Group study in 1991 (8). In contemporary literature, success rates particularly for VE remain unchanged for the past three decades since the original published success rates by the Vasectomy Reversal Study Group (12). VE is associated with a longer time to patency as well with patients taking 2.8 to 6.6 months to have sperm return to ejaculate as compared to 1.7 to 4.3 months for those undergoing VV. Additionally, of those patients who successfully have sperm return to the ejaculate after VE up to 50% will have delayed failure compared to 12% for those undergoing VV who are patent. Finally, of those who experience delayed failure after undergoing VE it usually occurs earlier with studies reporting as early as 6 months post-operatively (10). Given the lack of improvement and significantly worsened outcomes with VE further surgical refinement is a constant goal for surgeons performing this procedure.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this video is both a demonstration and a call to action for commitment to surgical innovation. We aim to raise the bar in VE success rates, ultimately bringing tangible benefits to patients and contributing to the ongoing evolution of reproductive medicine. The novel epididymal occlusion stitch emerges as a beacon of progress, promising not only enhanced safety but also potential reductions in patency time. Surgical excellence and methodological refinement, as exemplified in this video, lay the foundation for a future where male reproductive surgery continues to break new ground.

Vas deferens to rete testis anastomosis for obstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

This video aims to present an in-depth, step-by-step tutorial on microsurgical reconstruction for obstructive azoospermia, featuring a distinctive case involving anastomosis from vas deferens to rete testis. The primary aim of this endeavor is to offer thorough and practical insights for healthcare professionals and researchers within the realm of reproductive medicine. The video endeavors to disseminate expertise, methodologies, and perspectives that can be advantageous to individuals grappling with obstructive azoospermia, providing a significant contribution to the progress of reproductive medicine and the augmentation of existing treatment alternatives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical footage was recorded using the ORBEYE 4K 3D Orbital Camera System by Olympus America, with patient consent acquired for research purposes. Additionally, a retrospective examination of patient records was undertaken to compile relevant medical histories.

RESULTS

This video furnishes an exhaustive guide to microsurgical reconstruction for obstructive azoospermia, encompassing a distinctive instance of anastomosis from vas deferens to rete testis. State-of-the-art technology, such as the ORBEYE 4K 3D Orbital Camera, heightens procedural transparency, accentuating the significance of advanced instrumentation. The ethical underpinning is emphasized by obtaining patient consent for footage utilization, and a retrospective chart review augments the repository of valuable patient data. This comprehensive approach serves as an invaluable reservoir of knowledge for medical professionals and underscores excellence in clinical and ethical healthcare research.

CONCLUSIONS

Anastomosis from vas deferens to rete testis emerges as a viable surgical reconstruction alternative for obstructive azoospermia, particularly when confronted with non-dilated tubules within the epididymis.

Sperm retrieval outcomes of contralateral testis in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and unsuccessful unilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction

▪▪▪.

Comparative evaluation of double- and single-armed two-suture longitudinal intussusception techniques in microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of double-armed two-suture longitudinal intussusception microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (LIVE) and single-armed two-suture LIVE techniques in patients with epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA). The main outcomes assessed were patency rates, patency time, semen quality and natural pregnancy rates.

METHODS

Data from patients with EOA who underwent two-suture LIVE were obtained from databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Weighted data were analyzed using a random-effects model, and weighted mean differences were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 1574 patients with EOA from 24 studies were included. The overall patency rate was approximately 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63-72%), with a patency time of approximately 4.63 months (95% CI: 4.15-5.12). The sperm concentration reached 26.90 million/ml and the sperm motility was 23.74%. The natural pregnancy rate was 38% (95% CI: 31-46%). The different definitions of patency do not seem to have any meaningful impact when comparing patency rates. There was no significant difference in patency rates, patency time, semen quality and natural pregnancy rates between the double-armed and single-armed LIVE techniques.

CONCLUSION

The single-armed LIVE is a potential alternative surgical option when high quality double-needle sutures are not easily accessible.

A Prediction Model of Sperm Retrieval in Males with Idiopathic Non-obstructive Azoospermia for Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction

Patients with Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (iNOA) can achieve fertility by extracting testicular sperm through microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). But more than half of iNOA patients still cannot benefit from mTESE. In recent years, some studies had reported that serum hormones may be related to the outcome of sperm retrieval, but few had been verified. We hope to obtain a predictive method that is convenient for clinical application and can help judge the outcome of sperm extraction before implementing mTESE. We performed a retrospective analysis of NOA patients who underwent mTESE in the same andrology center from June 2020 to November 2022. A total of 261 patients with complete data were collected, logistic regression analysis was performed and a predictive model was constructed. Then, from December 2022 to May 2023, one prospective cohort of 48 NOA patients who met the inclusion criteria from the same center was recruited to validate the risk prediction model. We successfully constructed a logistic regression model to predict the outcome of iNOA patients undergoing mTESE and found that higher serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were associated with failure sperm retrieval, resulting in an AMH cut-off of 2.60 ng/ml. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.811, the sensitivity was 0.870, and the specificity was 0.705. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the threshold probability was above 4%, and unnecessary mTESE could be reduced using this model. In a prospective cohort at the same center, 85.42% (41/48) of iNOA patients correctly identified the mTESE outcome using this model. A logistic regression model with AMH as an independent predictor can predict mTESE outcomes in iNOA patients. Preoperative selection of mTESE in patients with iNOA using this model had clinical benefit in reducing unnecessary surgery. The model demonstrated good accuracy in a small prospective cohort validation.

Financial decision analysis based on "willingness to pay" for surgical sperm retrieval approaches among men with non-obstructive azoospermia in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine the most financially optimal surgical approach for testicular sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

DESIGN

A decision tree was created examining five potential surgical approaches for men with non-obstructive azoospermia pursuing one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. An expected financial net loss was determined for each surgical option based on couples' willingness to pay for one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection resulting in pregnancy. The branch with the lowest expected net loss was defined as the most optimal financial decision (minimizing loss to a couple). Fresh testicular sperm extraction implied testicular sperm extraction was performed in conjunction with programmed ovulation induction. Frozen testicular sperm extraction implied testicular sperm extraction was performed initially, and ovulation induction/intracytoplasmic sperm injection was canceled if sperm retrieval failed.  The surgical options included fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction, with and without "back-up" sperm cryopreservation, fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, with and without "back-up" sperm cryopreservation, and frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction. Success was defined as pregnancy after one intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Probabilities of successful sperm retrieval with conventional testicular sperm extraction/microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, post-thaw sperm cellular loss following frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, ovulation induction/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle out-of-pocket costs, intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy rates for men with non-obstructive azoospermia, standard conventional testicular sperm extraction cost and average willingness to pay for intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle were gathered from the systematic literature review. Costs were in USD and adjusted to inflation (as of April 2020). Two-way sensitivity analysis was performed on varying couples' willingness to pay for one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and varying microsurgical testicular sperm extraction out-of-pocket costs.

RESULTS

According to our decision tree analysis (assuming minimum microsurgical testicular sperm extraction cost of $1,000 and willingness to pay of $8,000), the expected net loss for each branch was as follows: -$17,545 for fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction, -$17,523 for fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, -$9,624 for frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, -$17,991 for fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction with "backup", and -$18,210 for fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction with "backup". Two-way sensitivity analysis with a variable willingness to pay values and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and in-vitro fertilization costs confirmed that frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction consistently presented the lowest net loss compared to other options. Interestingly, when directly comparing fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and conventional testicular sperm extraction with "back-up", scenarios with decreasing willingness to pay and lower microsurgical testicular sperm extraction costs demonstrated fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction with "back-up" as more optimal than fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction with "back-up".

CONCLUSIONS

For those couples who must pay out of pocket, our study suggests that frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the most financially optimal decision for the surgical management of non-obstructive azoospermia, regardless of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction cost and the couple's willingness to pay.

Results from the first autologous grafting of adult human testis tissue: a case report

Fertility restoration using autologous testicular tissue transplantation is relevant for infertile men surviving from childhood cancer and, possibly, in men with absent or incomplete spermatogenesis resulting in the lack of spermatozoa in the ejaculate (non-obstructive azoospermia, NOA). Currently, testicular tissue from pre-pubertal boys extracted before treatment with gonadotoxic cancer therapy can be cryopreserved with good survival of spermatogonial stem cells. However, strategies for fertility restoration, after successful cancer treatment, are still experimental and no clinical methods have yet been developed. Similarly, no clinically available treatments can help men with NOA to become biological fathers after failed attempts of testicular surgical sperm retrieval. We present a case of a 31-year-old man with NOA who had three pieces of testis tissue (each ∼2 × 4 × 2 mm3) extracted and cryopreserved in relation to performing microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). Approximately 2 years after mTESE, the thawed tissue pieces were engrafted in surgically created pockets bilaterally under the scrotal skin. Follow-up was performed after 2, 4, and 6 months with assessment of reproductive hormones and ultrasound of the scrotum. After 6 months, all engrafted tissue was extracted and microscopically analyzed for the presence of spermatozoa. Furthermore, parts of the extracted tissue were analyzed histologically and by immunohistochemical analysis. Active blood flow in the engrafted tissue was demonstrated by doppler ultrasound after 6 months. No spermatozoa were found in the extracted tissue. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated graft survival with intact clear tubules and normal cell organization. Sertoli cells and spermatocytes with normal morphology were located near the basement membrane. MAGE-A and VASA positive spermatogonia/spermatocytes were detected together with SOX9 positive Sertoli cells. Spermatocytes and/or Sertoli cells positive for γH2AX was also detected. In summary, following autologous grafting of frozen-thawed testis tissue under the scrotal skin in a man with NOA, we demonstrated graft survival after 6 months. No mature spermatozoa were detected; however, this is likely due to the pre-existing spermatogenic failure.

Predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed initial TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited.

CONCLUSION

We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.

[Testicular and epididymal sperm extraction surgery]

BACKGROUND

Testicular and epididymal sperm extraction surgery is a frequent procedure. However, to date, there has been no French consensus on the technique to be preferred in the various situations of male infertility and on the best way to perform them. We therefore decided to proceed with a formalized expert consensus, using the method recommended by the French National Authority for Health. The aim was to provide the French urology community with practical advice on how best to perform these procedures.

METHODS

Twenty-six international experts met online for the consensus. A research committee carried out a comprehensive literature review and prepared the 55 statements submitted to the rating group. After 2 rounds of scoring, 50 recommendations were validated in March 2023, having achieved a consensus of more than 85% among the experts.

RESULTS

The consensus covered (1) preparation for sperm extraction surgery, (2) the different sperm extraction surgery techniques (Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration [MESA], Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration [PESA], Conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction [TESE], Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction [micro-TESE]), (3) advice to be given to the patient concerning the postoperative period, before presenting the results of the sperm extraction surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

The expert consensus meeting on the performance of sperm extraction surgery presented a set of clinical guidelines based on the available literature and expert opinion. These guidelines should have a favourable effect on the development of this activity in France.

Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is among the most common causes of male infertility. For men with NOA seeking fertility treatment, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is the best option for retrieving sperm, which can be used with in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection to achieve pregnancy in their partner. With the aid of the operating microscope, microTESE allows for thorough evaluation of the testis tissue and selection of seminiferous tubules that appear most capable of sperm production. Rates of success with microTESE vary depending on the underlying cause of NOA and the center at which the procedure is performed. Not all patients are candidates for microTESE, and those who are candidates should be counseled on the likelihood of sperm retrieval and the potential for changes in postoperative testis function.

[The application study of Electrophysiological appropriate technology in perioperative nursing of patients undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction]

Obstract: To explore the application of electrophysiological appropriate technology in perioperative nursing of patients undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 108 patients who underwent testicular incision and sperm extraction under a microscope at our center from May 2022 to June 2023. Among them, 51 patients received routine care and 57 patients received electrophysiological treatment. Evaluate the perioperative nursing effects of appropriate electrophysiological techniques through VAS pain score, Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Score, and Kolcaba Comfort Scale.

RESULT

Patients who received appropriate electrophysiological interventions had lower VAS pain scores (2.36 ± 1.37 vs 4.16 ± 1.38, P<0.001) than the control group, and higher KOLCABA comfort scale scores than the control group (70.73 ± 19.46 vs 52.06 ± 17.50, P<0.001); There was no statistically significant difference in the Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Score.

CONCLUSION

Electrophysiological techniques can effectively improve postoperative pain and comfort in patients undergoing testicular incision and sperm extraction under a microscope, and have clinical application value.

[Molecular markers for predicting the success of micro-TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia]

Non-obstract azoospermia (NOA) is a serious male infertility disease. At present, testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is performed in combination with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technology, NOA patients can have their own consanguine offspring. However, due to the invasiveness and uncertainty of micro-TESE surgery, it is difficult for patients to accept it. Therefore, finding an accurate method to predict the possibility of micro-TESE successful sperm retrival would be beneficial to azoospermia patients. Many genes are transcribed and expressed during spermatogenesis, and molecular assays have irreplaceable sensitivity and specificity in predicting the success sperm retrivel of micro-TESE. This article reviews the methods to predict the success sperm retrivel of micro-TESE including mRNA, non-coding RNA (piRNA, microRNA, cirRNA, tFRNAs) and some protein so far, to provide certain reference value for clinical and subsequent research.

Comparison of unilateral and bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare sperm retrieval rates between unilateral and bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) procedures in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and to contribute to the literature by comparing them with literature data.

METHODS

This prospective study included 84 males with primary infertility who had azoospermic NOA, who had been married for at least one year, and whose female partners did not have a history of infertility. The study was conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. MD-TESE was applied bilaterally to 48% (n:41) (Group 1) and unilaterally to 52% (n:43) (Group 2) of the patients, and sperm retrieval rates were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 patients and Group 2 patients in terms of sperm availability (61%, 56.5%, p=0.495, respectively). In addition, while no complications were observed in unilateral MD-TESEs, 3 complications were observed in bilateral MD-TESEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of sperm availability in patients with NOA. Considering the operative time and complication rates of bilateral MD-TESE in patients diagnosed with NOA and the possible MD-TESE procedures that may be performed later, we believe that unilateral MD TESE is a more preferable procedure for the patient and surgeon in this patient group.

Discordant Bilateral Testicular Pathology Does not Affect Sperm Retrieval Rate in Bilateral Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (mTESE)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence of discordant testicular pathology in men undergoing bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) and association with sperm retrieval rate.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-institutional review of all patients undergoing mTESE from 2007 to 2021 and aggregated clinical history, physical exam, semen analysis, and operative findings. Specimens with discordant pathology were re-reviewed by an experienced genitourinary.ßpathologist and categorized in a standardized fashion. Data were analyzed using SPSS.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen non-obstructive azoospermia.ßmen undergoing 132 mTESEs were identified within the study period. Eighty-five percent (112/132) of cases had pathology specimens available, and within this specific cohort the success rate was 41.9% (47/112). A total of 206 pathological reports resulted including 52.4% Sertoli cell only, 4.9% Leydig cell hyperplasia, 8.7% fibrosis, 16.5% maturation arrest, and 17.5% hypospermatogenesis. Twelve percent of testicles had more than 1 pathologic diagnosis. Sixty-six men had synchronous bilateral testicular pathology, and 11/66 (16.6%) had at least partially discordant pathology on initial review. Focused re-review by a genitourinary pathologist confirmed exclusively discordant pathology in 7/66 (10.6%) cases, with a sperm retrieval rate of 57% (4/7). The sperm retrieval rate.ßin men with discordant pathology was not significantly different from those with concordant pathology.

CONCLUSION

Over 1 in 10 men undergoing mTESE may have discordant pathology between testicles, though this may not affect sperm retrieval rate.ßat the time of procedure. Clinicians should consider submitting bilateral testicular specimens for pathology to (1) clarify their outcomes data, and (2) assist with clinical decision-making and surgical planning if a repeat mTESE is indicated.

Feasibility of repeat microdissection testicular sperm extraction within 6 months for nonobstructive azoospermia

BACKGROUND

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is the mainstay of sperm retrieval in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Some experts believe that a resting period of ≥6 months is required between procedures to ensure better sperm retrieval rates and fewer complications. However, no scientific studies have investigated how long patients should wait before arranging a second mTESE procedure. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether good success rates are still achieved when a repeat mTESE procedure is performed within 6 months.

METHODS

Total 146 patients with NOA who underwent mTESE twice from the same testis between May 2012 and September 2019 were retrospectively collected. These patients were categorized into three groups according to the time interval between the two mTESE surgeries, with 44, 60, and 42 patients undergoing a repeat mTESE after <3 months (group I), between 3 and 6 months (group II), and >6 months (group III) after the first procedure, respectively.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of patient characteristics and preoperative hormone profiles. Overall sperm retrieval rates did not differ among the three groups (93.2%, 90.0%, and 88.1% in groups I, II, and III, respectively [ p = 0.719]), nor did fertility outcomes, including rates of fertilization, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and cumulative live births.

CONCLUSION

Sperm retrieval rates for repeat mTESE procedures were consistently high, even when the second procedure was performed within 6 months of the first. Repeat mTESE within 6 months is not a limitation for patients with NOA, if required clinically.

[Seminal vesiculoscopy-assisted thulium laser ablation for the treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction: An analysis of clinical outcomes]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of seminal vesiculoscopy-assisted thulium laser ablation (SVS-TLA) in the treatment of oligoasthenozoospermia or azoospermia induced by ejaculatory duct obstruction (EDO).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data on 42 cases of EDO-induced oligoasthenozoospermia or azoospermia in our Clinic of Andrology from April 2018 to January 2020, all definitely diagnosed and treated by SVS-TLA. We followed up the patients regularly after operation, obtained their routine semen parameters at 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively, examined them by t-test and compared them with the baseline.

RESULTS

Operations were successfully completed in all the 42 cases, with an average surgery time of 52.7 minutes. Compared with the routine semen parameters collected 2 weeks before surgery, the semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm motility of the patients were all significantly improved at 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively (P < 0.01). Sperm were found in 40 cases at 3 months and in the other 2 cases at 6 and 9 months after surgery. Postoperative complications were observed in 7 cases, including epididymitis, perineal or testicular pain, and hematuria, which all disappeared after corresponding symptomatic treatment. No such serious complications as retrograde ejaculation, rectal injury, urethral stricture or urinary incontinence occurred in any of the cases after operation.

CONCLUSION

SVS-TLA is a safe and effective option for the treatment of EDO, which can significantly improve the semen quality of the patient without causing serious postoperative complications.

Optimizing outcomes for men with severe infertility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate recent evidence related to optimizing outcomes for men with severe infertility, including effect of ejaculatory abstinence interval on semen parameters and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, and impact of cryopreservation on surgically retrieved testicular sperm obtained from men with nonobstructive azoospermia (also referred to as azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction).

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence strongly suggests that a short abstinence interval improves sperm motility and ART outcomes. Similarly, recent studies have concluded that using fresh vs. frozen testicular sperm results in higher live birth rates.

SUMMARY

Although the World Health Organization currently recommends a 2- to 7-day ejaculatory abstinence period, this interval is based more on the need to standardize semen parameters than clinical outcomes. In fact, recent evidence suggests that shorter abstinence consistently improves sperm motility and ART outcomes for infertile men. Similarly, recent studies have reported an improvement in live birth rates with fresh (vs. frozen) testicular sperm, though their retrospective design and lack of intention to treat analyses makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions. Although additional, well designed studies are needed, providers may be able to leverage these techniques in their practice to improve outcomes for some infertile men.

Modern surgical treatment of azoospermia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review noteworthy research from the last 2 years on surgical management of azoospermia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recommended treatments for nonobstructive and obstructive azoospermia have not appreciably changed. However, recent level-1 evidence has reinforced superiority of micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction over sperm aspiration in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and several studies have identified genetic and other clinical factors that may aid in selecting candidates for testicular sperm extraction. Machine learning technology has shown promise as a decision support system for patient selection prior to sperm retrieval as well a tool to aid in sperm identification from testis tissue.

SUMMARY

Most men with obstructive azoospermia who desire fertility can be offered either surgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval. For men with nonobstructive azoospermia, sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction remains the gold standard treatment. Uncovering more genetic causes of nonobstructive azoospermia may aid in properly counseling and selecting patients for microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Neural networks and deep learning may have a future role in patient selection for surgical sperm retrieval and postprocedural sperm identification.

Azoospermia and Sperm Retrieval in Post-Pubertal Testicular Torsion; Benefits and limitations

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of azoospermia development and the value of sperm retrieval in post-pubertal testicular torsion (TT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included patients with post-pubertal TT. Surgical exploration was urgently performed with either orchiopexy or orchiedectomy and contralateral orchiopexy. With the intention of cryopreservation, all cases underwent conventional testicular sperm extraction. Patients were followed-up after 1, 3, and 6 months with semen analysis and hormonal assay (FSH, LH and testosterone). Sperm retrieval rate (SRR), azoospermia rate and changes in hormonal profile were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study included 62 patients with a median (IQR) age of 19 (18-20.7) years and duration of testicular torsion of 32.5 (18.3-48) hours. Testicular salvage was successful in 20 (32.3%) while orchiedectomy was performed on 42 patients. The duration of torsion [OR, 95% CI = 0.75 (0.61-0.93), P = .008] was the independent predictor of testicular salvage. Successful SR was achieved in 58 patients (93.5%); (40 from the affected testis and 18 from the contralateral side). After 6 months, 21 patients (33.8%) developed azoospermia [19 (45.2%) in orchidectomy group and 2 (10%) in orchiopexy group, P = .006]. Abnormal contralateral testis was the independent predictor of azoospermia [OR, 95% CI = 92(8.4-101.5), P < .001]. Azoospermia patients showed a statistically significant increase in FSH and LH and decrease in testosterone level as compared to the non-azoospermia group (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Azoospermia is not rare in post-pubertal TT patients; therefore, SR at time of intervention seems to be a good option for them to preserve their fertility potentials.

Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Versus Multiple Needle-pass Percutaneous Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical extraction of testicular spermatozoa is needed in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) who wish to become biological fathers. Based on available uncontrolled studies with unspecific patient selection, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE), having a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of 50%, is considered the most efficient sperm retrieval procedure. However, no randomized clinical trials for comparison of different sperm retrieval procedures exist. Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is simple and commonly used, and we hypothesized that this technique using multiple needle passes would give similar SRRs to mTESE.

OBJECTIVE

To compare mTESE and multiple needle-pass TESA in men with NOA.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A randomized clinical trial was performed between June 2017 and April 2021, with inclusion of 100 men with NOA from four centers in Denmark and Sweden. All participants received treatment at the same institution.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized to mTESE (n = 49) or multiple needle-pass TESA (n = 51). Patients with failed multiple needle-pass TESA proceeded directly to salvage mTESE.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was SRR. Secondary outcomes included complications and changes in reproductive hormones after surgery.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Spermatozoa were retrieved in 21/49 (43%) men after mTESE and in 11/51 (22%) men after multiple needle-pass TESA (rate difference -0.21; 95% confidence interval -0.39 to -0.03; p = 0.02). The combined SRR for multiple needle-pass TESA + salvage mTESE was 15/51 (29%). No complications occurred after multiple needle-pass TESA only, while 5/89 (6%) men having mTESE experienced a complication requiring surgical intervention. Overall, no statistically significant differences in reproductive hormones were observed between groups after 6 mo. Limitations include the low number of patients in secondary outcome data.

CONCLUSIONS

In direct comparison, SRR was higher in mTESE than in multiple needle-pass TESA.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Men with azoospermia need surgical extraction of spermatozoa to become biological fathers. In this randomized trial, we compared two surgeries (microdissection testicular sperm extraction [mTESE] and testicular sperm aspiration [TESA]) and found that mTESE gives a higher sperm retrieval rate than multiple needle-pass TESA.

Testicular microdissection following failed sperm aspiration: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Azoospermia is a cause of infertility in a subgroup of infertile men. Sperm retrieval techniques including testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) and microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) are widely used. In this study, we have reviewed our findings regarding mTESE performed following a negative TESA outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review study that included 41 infertile patients who underwent mTESE after a negative TESA outcome. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, type of infertility, and type of azoospermia. Hormone level analysis was done for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone. Testicular volume was estimated by ultrasound.

RESULTS

The study included 41 patients who underwent mTESE following a negative TESA outcome. Most patients had primary infertility (n = 32; 78%). Of the 41 patients, four had a previous history of either TESE or orchidopexy, and two had a history of varicocelectomy before the recent percutaneous TESA procedure. There was no significant association between sperm retrieval and the different surgical procedures that had been performed. Of the 41 patients, 27 had positive sperm retrieval by mTESE with a success rate of 65.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive sperm retrieval rate of mTESE performed following a negative TESA outcome was reasonable (65.9%). No significant correlations were identified with all variables studied.

Automated rare sperm identification from low-magnification microscopy images of dissociated microsurgical testicular sperm extraction samples using deep learning

OBJECTIVE

To develop a machine learning algorithm to detect rare human sperm in semen and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) samples using bright-field (BF) microscopy for nonobstructive azoospermia patients.

DESIGN

Spermatozoa were collected from fertile men. Testis biopsies were collected from microTESE samples determined to be clinically negative for sperm. A convolutional neural network based on the U-Net architecture was trained using 35,761 BF image patches with fluorescent ground truth image pairs to segment sperm. The algorithm was validated using 7,663 image patches. The algorithm was tested using 7,663 image patches containing abundant sperm, as well as 7,985 image patches containing rare sperm.

SETTING

In vitro fertilization center and university laboratories.

PATIENT(S)

Normospermic and nonobstructive azoospermia patients.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Precision (positive predictive value [PPV]), recall (sensitivity), and F1-score of detected sperm locations.

RESULT(S)

For sperm-only samples, our algorithm achieved 91% PPV, 95.8% sensitivity, and 93.3% F1-score at ×10 magnification. For dissociated microTESE samples doped with an abundant quantity of sperm, our algorithm achieved 84.0% PPV, 72.7% sensitivity, and 77.9% F1-score. For dissociated microTESE samples doped with rare sperm, our algorithm achieved 84.4% PPV, 86.1% sensitivity, and 85.2% F1-score.

CONCLUSION(S)

Rare sperm can be detected in patients' testis biopsy samples for potential subsequent use in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A machine learning algorithm can use BF images at ×10 magnification to accurately detect sperm locations using automated imaging.

Testosterone levels among non-obstructive azoospermic patients 2 years after failed bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a nested case-cohort study

PURPOSE

To define the risk of hypogonadism following microdissection testicular sperm extraction in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. While sperm retrieval by open testicular sperm extraction can be associated with an increased risk of hypogonadism, there is limited data addressing which procedures and which patients harbor the greatest risk.

METHODS

We report on a community-acquired, nested, case-cohort of non-obstructive azoospermic patients referred to one clinic after failed bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Patients were health-matched (1:2) to surgically naïve controls and divided into 2 cohorts based on risk factors for hypogonadism. Among microdissection patients, we compared total testosterone and gonadotropin levels before and > 6 months after surgery. Biochemical hypogonadism was defined as a total serum testosterone level ≤ 300 ng/dL. Hormone levels were compared to risk-matched controls. Comparative statistics were used to assess hormone levels within and between cohorts.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline testosterone levels between microdissection patients (n = 26) and risk-matched controls (n = 52). At a mean of 26 months (range 6.2-112.8) post-procedure, mean testosterone levels decreased significantly (73 ng/dL or 16%; CI - 27, - 166; p < 0.01, paired t-test). Among microdissection patients with baseline testosterone > 300 ng/dL, 8/22 (36%) experienced hypogonadism post-procedure. There was a corresponding increase in follicle stimulating hormone (p = 0.05) and a trending increase in luteinizing hormones (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

A durable decrease in testosterone levels occurs after failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction regardless of baseline risk of hypogonadism. In addition, a significant proportion of eugonadal patients will become hypogonadal after failed testicular microdissection procedures.

Gonadotropins treatment prior to microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: a single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in combination with ICSI can make paternity possible for non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. Testicular sperm can be successfully retrieved in nearly half of NOA patients. Nevertheless, not many convincing protocols are established to improve sperm retrieval rate (SRR). The goal of this study was to evaluate whether gonadotropins therapy before micro-TESE could improve sperm retrieval rate and affect the ICSI outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia patients with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included a total of 569 non-obstructive azoospermia men who underwent micro-TESE with or without 3-month of preoperative hCG / hCG plus highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH) between January 2016 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the sperm retrieval rate of micro-TESE.

RESULTS

Sperm was found in 27 patients among 395 NOA men who accepted preoperative gonadotropins treatment (6.8%, 27/395) in post-treatment semen analysis for ICSI. One hundred forty nine out of 542 patients could successfully obtain enough sperm for ICSI through the micro-TESE (overall SRR = 27.5%). There was a statistically significant difference in the SRR between the preoperative gonadotropins treatment and non-gonadotropins treatment groups (31.2%, 115/368 vs. 19.5%, 34/174, P = 0.006). In the multivariable analysis with IPTW according to the propensity score, there was a significant association between preoperative gonadotropins treatment and the SRR (OR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.02-2.52; P = 0.042). No differences in the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth delivery rate, or miscarriage rate were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative gonadotropins therapy seems to have a role in improving SRR in NOA patients with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. We found that gonadotropins therapy had no effect on ICSI clinical outcomes and live birth.

Nomogram based on a circular RNA biomarker for predicting the likelihood of successful sperm retrieval via microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia

BACKGROUND

Many circular RNAs (circRNAs) are specifically expressed in the testes and seminal plasma of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), highlighting them as potential predictors of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) outcomes. Although research has indicated that circular RNA monoglyceride lipase (circ_MGLL) is highly expressed in the testicular tissues of patients with NOA, the association between circ_MGLL expression and sperm retrieval outcomes (SROs) in patients with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (iNOA) receiving micro-TESE remains unclear.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled 114 patients with iNOA who underwent micro-TESE at Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital from January 2017 to November 2021. A logistic regression model was used to examine associations between SRO and circ_MGLL expression in testicular tissues, the results of which were used in conjunction with previous findings to establish a nomogram. The predictive performance of the circ_MGLL-based nomogram was evaluated via calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) using an internal validation method.

RESULTS

The generalized additive model indicated that the probability of successful SRO for micro-TESE decreased as circ_MGLL expression increased in testicular tissues. Across the entire cohort, univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that circ_MGLL expression was inversely associated with SRO in patients with NOA. This trend did not change after stratification according to age, body mass index, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level, luteinizing hormone (LH) level, testosterone (T) level, or pathological type (or after adjusting for these confounders) (odds ratio <1, P < 0.001). A nomogram was then generated by integrating circ_MGLL, pathological types, and FSH, LH, and T levels. The circ_MGLL-based predictive model achieved satisfactory discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.857, and the calibration curves demonstrated impressive agreement. The DCA indicated that the net clinical benefit of the circ_MGLL-based predictive model was greater than that of circ_MGLL alone.

CONCLUSION

circ_MGLL is significantly associated with the SRO of micro-TESE in patients with iNOA. The circ_MGLL-based nomogram developed in the current study can predict successful SRO with high accuracy.

Onco-Testicular Sperm Extraction (oncoTESE): A Contemporary Concept Review and Report of Australian Sperm Retrieval Rates and Fertility Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess sperm retrieval rates of Onco-Testicular Sperm Extraction (oncoTESE) in men with testicular tumors and coexisting severe spermatogenic impairment.

METHODS

Multi-centre Australian wide retrospective review of oncoTESE procedures performed within the last 10 years. Patients were postpubertal adults having a testicular tumor requiring orchidectomy, with severe oligozoospermia or nonobstructive azoospermia. Ipsilateral testicular sperm extraction was performed following radical inguinal orchidectomy. A contralateral micro-testicular sperm extraction was performed if no sperm or insufficient amounts were initially achieved. Surgical sperm retrieval rates, live birth rates and post operative serum testosterone were recorded.

RESULTS

Four surgeons compiled a total 13 patients. The mean age was 34.9 years. Seven of 13 were germ cell tumor (GCT), 4 of 13 had non-GCT and 2 of 13 contained benign lesions. Twelve of 13 patients were azoospermic and 1 was severely oligozoospermic. Sperm was found in 6 of 7 GCT patients; 3 of 7 were found in the ipsilateral testis whilst the remaining 4 underwent contralateral micro-testicular sperm extraction; sperm was retrieved in 3 of 4. The respective mean pre and post orchidectomy testosterone was 12.0 vs 14.1nmol/L (GCT cohort). Cryopreserved sperm has been used in assisted reproduction in 2 of 13 patients, with median follow up of 38.7 months. Including use of both cryopreserved and fresh sperm, 6 pregnancies were achieved, including 5 healthy live births and 1 miscarriage.

CONCLUSION

OncoTESE appears feasible, with acceptable sperm retrieval and subsequent live birth rates, following assisted reproduction. Despite significant underutilisation in the Australian population, oncoTESE should be considered in the management for TC patients with severe oligozoospermia, or nonobstructive azoospermia.

[Real-time transrectal ultrasound-guided seminal vesiculoscopy for the treatment of azoospermia secondary to ejaculatory duct obstruction]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of real-time transrectal ultrasound-guided seminal vesiculoscopy (TRUS-SVS) in the treatment of azoospermia secondary to ejaculatory duct obstruction.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 40 cases of azoospermia secondary to bilateral ejaculatory ducts obstruction treated by TRUS-SVS from June 2016 to June 2018 after failure to enter the vesiculoscope through the ejaculatory duct or prostatic utricle. We analyzed the success rate of surgery, operation time, postoperative complications, treatment results, and application value of TRUS-SVS.

RESULTS

Real-time TRUS-SVS was successfully performed in 36 (90.0%) of the cases, 33 through bilateral and the other 3 through unilateral seminal vesicle, with a mean operation time of (32.8 ± 16.6) min. Thirty-seven of the cases were followed up for 6－15 (mean 9.3) months, of which sperm were found in 31 at 1－3 months and in 25 at 3－12 months, and pregnancies achieved in 9 cases within 12 months after surgery. No serious complications as retrograde ejaculation, urinary incontinence and rectal injury were observed postoperatively, except 2 cases of epididymitis and 2 cases of hematuria, which were all cured.

CONCLUSIONS

For the patients who failed in seminal vesiculoscopy through the ejaculatory duct or prostatic utricle, real-time TRUS-SVS is a recommended procedure with the advantages of a high success rate, less damage to the prostate and rectum, and benefit to the improvement of semen quality.

Rat model and validation of a modified single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: Guo's SA-LIVE

BACKGROUND

Double-armed suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (DA-LIVE) has been widely adopted owing to its simplicity and high success rate; however, specialized double-armed microsutures are required.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a novel single-armed suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (SA-LIVE) technique using only two single-armed sutures, named Guo's SA-LIVE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four weeks after vasectomy in male adult Wistar rats, vasoepididymostomies were performed using DA-LIVE, SA-LIVE, or Guo's SA-LIVE. After 12 weeks, functional patency was functionally assessed by evaluating for motile spermatozoa distal to the anastomosis. If no motile spermatozoa were visible, the mechanical patency of the anastomosis was tested by the ability of methylene blue to pass through the surgical anastomosis. The key procedure in Guo's SA-LIVE was cutting each needle with over 1cm attaching suture and making a flat overhand bend knot to tie the needle to the other end of the suture, after the needles were passed through the epididymal tubule and then the vasal lumen in an inside-out fashion, and then, the needles were passed through the vasal lumen in an inside-out fashion.

RESULTS

The proportions of functional patency were 50.0% (3/6), 33.3% (2/6), and 50% (3/6) for the DA-LIVE, SA-LIVE, and Guo's SA-LIVE groups, respectively (P = .799). The proportions of mechanical plus functional patency for the three methods were 83.3% (5/6), 66.7% (4/6), and 83.3% (5/6), respectively (P = .725). The mean anastomosis times for the three LIVE techniques and the proportions of complications were similar (P = .150 and .758, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Guo's single-armed suture technique is a potentially effective alternative to perform vasoepididymostomy when specialized double-armed microsutures are not available based on the current animal experiment.

The Role of Hormone Stimulation in Men With Nonobstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Surgical Sperm Retrieval

Nonobstructive azoospermia, (NOA) is the most common cause of azoospermia. NOA is characterized by hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, testicular failure, and impaired spermatogenesis. The recent development of surgical sperm retrieval techniques such as microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) has, for the first time, allowed some men with NOA to father biological children. It is common practice for endocrine stimulation therapies such as gonadotropins, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and aromatase inhibitors to be used prior to mTESE to increase intratesticular testosterone synthesis with the aim of improving sperm retrieval rates; however, there is currently a paucity of data underpinning their safety and efficacy. We present 2 cases of men with NOA undergoing endocrine stimulation therapy and mTESE. We also discuss the current evidence and controversies associated with the use of hormonal stimulation therapy in couples affected by this severe form of male infertility.

Robotic Surgery for Male Infertility

The robotic platform offers theoretical and practical advantages to microsurgical male infertility surgery. These include reduction or elimination of tremor, 3-dimensional visualization, and decreased need for skilled surgical assistance. This article reviews the application of robotic surgery to each of the 4 primary male infertility procedures: vasectomy reversal, varicocelectomy, testicular sperm extraction, and spermatic cord denervation. Historical perspective is presented alongside the available outcomes data, which are limited in most cases. Before the robotic approach can be widely adopted, further clinical trials are needed to compare outcomes and costs with those of other validated surgical techniques.

A comprehensive assessment of predictors of fertility outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction

BACKGROUND

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is the procedure that results in the highest number of sperm cells retrieved for in vitro fertilization (IVF). This study presents a novel assessment of predictors of sperm retrieval as well as downstream embryology and pregnancy outcomes in cases of men with NOA undergoing microTESE.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 72 men who underwent microTESE for predictors of fertility outcomes including sperm retrieved at microTESE, embryology progression to embryo transfer (ET), clinical pregnancy, live birth, and surplus sperm retrieved for additional IVF/intracytoplasmic injection cycles beyond one initial cycle. Statistical models for each of these outcomes were fitted, with a p-value of < 0.05 considered significant for the parameters estimated in each model.

RESULTS

Seventy-two men underwent microTESE, and 51/72 (70.8%) had sperm retrieved. Of those, 29/43 (67.4%) reached ET. Of the couples who underwent ET, 21/29 (72.4%) achieved pregnancy and 18/29 (62.1%) resulted in live birth. Of the men with sperm retrieved, 38/51 (74.5%) had surplus sperm cryopreserved beyond the initial IVF cycle. Age, testicular volume, FSH, and testicular histopathology were assessed as predictors for sperm retrieved at microTESE, progression to ET, pregnancy, live birth, and surplus sperm. There were no preoperative predictors of sperm retrieval, clinical pregnancy, or live birth. Age predicted reaching ET, with older men having increased odds. FSH level had a negative relationship with surplus sperm retrieved. Men with hypospermatogenesis histology had higher rates of sperm retrieval, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and having surplus sperm.

CONCLUSIONS

Men who underwent microTESE with a hypospermatogenesis histopathology had better outcomes, including higher rates of sperm retrieval, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and having surplus sperm retrieved. Increasing male partner age increased the odds of reaching ET. No other clinical factors were predictive for the outcomes considered.

[Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) - a new sperm recovery technique helping men with non-obstructive azoospermia]

The most severe form of male infertility is non obstructive azoospermia (NOA), where spermatogenesis is impaired or absent. If testicular sperm can be retrieved, men with NOA can become biological fathers with IVF/ ICSI. In Sweden, testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is the most common method used to retrieve sperm but is only successful in up to 34% of procedures. In 2013, our fertility center introduced MD-TESE, where an operating microscope is used to target the biopsies. We have performed more than 134 MD-TESE procedures, mainly in cases where TESA sperm recovery failed previously. Sperm sufficient for ICSI were recovered in 52 % and in these cases 75 % resulted in embryo transfer, resulting in a 34 % ongoing pregnancy rate/deliveries per transfer. Results are encouraging and hopefully more Swedish IVF centers will introduce this technique.

[Surgical testicular extraction of spermatozoa in men with non-obstructive azoospermia]

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a severe form of male infertility. The only option to help men with NOA to become biological fathers is to surgically extract spermatozoa from the testicles, and in this review different modalities are discussed. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction seems to achieve better sperm retrieval rates compared with both testicular sperm aspiration and testicular sperm extraction. However, there are significant limitations in the current literature, and without prospective randomised trials it is not possible to define the optimal sperm retrieval technique for the management of NOA.

[Microsurgical management of obstructive azoospermia: Progress and prospects]

In the past two decades, with the rapid development of assisted reproductive technology and particularly the technological advances in male infertility microsurgery, many obstructive azoospermia-related infertile couples can now acquire the chances of natural pregnancy via reconstruction of the seminal tract. This article highlights the latest advances in surgical reconstruction of the seminal tract for the treatment of obstructive azoospermia, such as the application of laparoscopic and robotic techniques, with a discussion on microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration and preservation, potential use of absorbable sutures or the bio-suture tape for microsurgical anastomosis in the management of obstructive azoospermia.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE): Predictive value of preoperative hormonal levels and pathology in non-obstructive azoospermia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative hormonal levels and pathology, as well as the outcome of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), presenting to our clinic for treatment of infertility. The records of 145 men with NOA who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) between March 2013 and November 2016 were studied. The patient's age, testicular volume, hormonal profile for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and testosterone (TT), and testicular pathology were recorded. The sperm retrieval, the clinical pregnancy and live birth delivery rates were noted. Our testicular sperm retrieval rate was 65.5%. There was no statistical difference in age, testicular volume, or hormonal levels in the TESE-positive and negative groups. Hypospermatogenesis was found in testicular histopathology in 57 of 117 patients (48.7%) who underwent testicular biopsy. Sertoli Cell-Only (SCO) syndrome was seen in 20.5%, Germ Cell Maturation Arrest (MA) in 16.3%, and Atrophy-hyalinization in 14.5%. Seven men had Klinefelter's syndrome (KS), four of whom were TESE-positive. There were no adverse effects of the procedure except for infection at the incision site in one patient. Single intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were performed in 92 couples leading to 41 clinical pregnancies and 26 live birth deliveries. Micro-TESE is a safe procedure in experienced hands and provides infertile men with NOA an opportunity to father children. However unselected candidates with NOA should be counselled at the outset that only 17.9% will eventually become biological fathers.

Effect of Varicocele Repair in Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. STUDY DESIGN: Ten patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and clinical varicoceles who underwent varicocele repair were retrospectively investigated. According to the postoperative appearance of motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate, the patients were divided into 2 groups: Responder and Nonresponder. The outcomes of each group were investigated. RESULTS: There were 4 (40%) patients in the Responder group. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels were significantly higher in the Nonresponder group than in the Responder group (19.9±6.4 IU/mL vs. 10.8± 4.0 IU/mL, p<0.05). Mean sperm concentration was 5.4 million spermatozoa/mL in the Responder group. One patient achieved a spontaneous pregnancy, and another achieved an assisted pregnancy. In the Nonresponder group 5 patients underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) postoperatively. In 1 patient, motile spermatozoa were successfully retrieved. Histopathological findings in the other 4 patients were Sertoli-cell-only. CONCLUSION: The present study suggested that varicocele repair could be considered in men with nonobstructive azoospermia who have clinical varicoceles. Moreover, varicocele repair seemed to improve sperm retrieval rate during micro-TESE for those in the Nonresponder group.

The Role of the Urologist in the Era of In Vitro Fertilization-Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

The use of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection has dramatically increased. In spite of this, the male partner in the couple is often not evaluated for fertility status or other general health conditions associated with male infertility. Such an approach goes against established guidelines recommending dual partner evaluations and does not address longer term male health risks. In this review, we discuss the urologist's role in the era of in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection, which includes diagnosing serious conditions associated with infertility, treating reversible causes of infertility, defining untreatable causes of testis failure, and, when appropriate, facilitating sperm retrieval.

[Qilin Pills for obstructive azoospermia after ejaculatory duct reconstruction]

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical effect of Qilin Pills in the treatment of severe oligozoospermia after microsurgical ejaculatory duct reconstruction for obstructive azoospermia.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 75 cases of obstructive azoospermia treated by ejaculatory duct reconstruction followed by administration of Qilin Pills. The patients were divided into a Qilin group (n=42) and a control group (n=33) postoperatively, treated with Qilin Pills and placebo, respectively. After 3 months of medication, we compared the sperm quality between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

After 3 months' treatment, all the patients experienced remarkable improvement in sperm quality (P<0.05). Compared with the controls, the patients in the Qilin group showed dramatic increases in sperm concentration, from (0.57±0.25) and (0.60±0.18) ×10⁶/ml before medication to (2.83±0.59) and (1.72 ±0.52) ×10⁶/ml after medication, significantly higher in the Qilin than in the control group (P<0.05). The percentage of grade a sperm was increased from (5.52±5.97) and (5.30±6.26)% to (11.56±9.96) and (10.27±6.52)%, that of grade a+b sperm from (9.68±8.63) and (8.64±10.10)% to (23.42 ±14.10) and (20.81±14.70)%, and that of morphologically normal sperm from (2.00±1.27) and (2.31±0.94)% to (3.54±2.47) and (3.47±1.33)%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in sperm motility and normal sperm morphology between the two groups after treatment (P>0.05). The total effectiveness rate was higher in the Qilin group than in the controls (88.1% vs 72.7%), but with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Qilin Pills are fairly effective in improving the quantity of sperm in obstructive azoospermia patients after ejaculatory duct reconstruction.

[Surgical treatment of azoospermia caused by iatrogenic injury to bilateral vas deferens]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the treatment of azoospermia induced by iatrogenic injury to the bilateral vas deferens.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 11 cases of azoospermia caused by iatrogenic injury to bilateral vas deferens. The patients were aged 20－33 years, all diagnosed with azoospermia preoperatively and none with a history of pelvic operation. Seven of them had received bilateral inguinal hernia repair and the other 4 undergone bilateral orchidopexy in the childhood.

RESULTS

Intraoperative exploration of the bilateral inguinal region was performed in all the patients. Bilateral vas deference atresia was found in the inguinal canal in 6 cases, which was treated by microscopic vasovasostomy following removal of the atresic segment. Vas deferens residual was observed in or near the deep inguinal ring in the other 5 cases, with the distal vas deferens inaccessible, which was treated by bilateral vasovasostomy in 3 cases and unilateral vasovasostomy in 2 (for longer defect segment than could be anastomosed) following combined laparoscopic exploration of the abdominal cavity. The patients were followed up for 3－12 months postoperatively, during which sperm were detected in 7 cases, with sperm concentration ranging from 0.4×10⁶/ml to 35×10⁶/ml and grade a+b sperm from 15% to 46%.

CONCLUSIONS

For the diagnosis of azoospermia, especially in patients with no history of pelvic operation, special attention should be paid to iatrogenic injury to the vas deferens. For the treatment of the disease, non-tension vasovasostomy is essential and, when necessary, the vas deferens can be reconstructed by changing its anatomical path and shortening its length.

Evaluation of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Results in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Independent Predictive Factors and Best Cutoff Values for Sperm Retrieval

PURPOSE

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was first introduced for the treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia. This study was conducted to detect predictive factors affecting the success of microTESE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the results of 191 cases who underwent microTESE. For each patient, the testicular volume, endocrine profile [follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), free testosterone (FT), total testosterone (TT)], serum inhibin B level, karyotype analysis, and Y chromosome microdeletions were recorded, and all data were analyzed to detect any predictors. The receiver operating characteristic curve, two-sample t-test and regression analysis were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 34.4 ± 5.6 years. Sperm retrieval was successful in 104 (54.5%) patients, and there was no sperm in 87 (45.5%). Seven factors including, testicular size, Johnson score, Y chromosome microdeletion, and serum FSH, LH, FT and TT levels were different between the successful and unsuccessful groups. Six patients had Klinefelter syndrome, and ten patients (5.2%) had a Y chromosome microdeletion (5 AZF-c, 1 AZF-b, 2 AZF-bc, 1 AZF-abc, and 1 AZF-ac). The Johnson score, TT level, family history and Y chromosome microdeletions were determined to be independent predictive factors for sperm found. According to the testicular histology, the sperm-found ratios were 36%, 48.6%, and 95.5% in the sertoli cell only syndrome, maturation arrest, and hypospermatogenesis groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, the Johnson score, TT level, family history-related infertility, and Y chromosome microdeletions were determined to be independent predictive factors for sperm found.

Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relative differences in outcomes among microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE), and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Outpatient academic and private urology clinics.

PATIENTS(S)

Men with nonobstructive azoospermia.

INTERVENTION(S)

Micro-TESE, cTESE, or TESA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Sperm retrieval (SR).

RESULT(S)

Fifteen studies with a total of 1,890 patients were identified. The weighted average age of the patients was 34.4 years, the follicular stimulating hormone level was 20.5 mIU/mL, the T was 373 ng/dL, and the testicular volume was 13.5 mL. In a direct comparison, performance of micro-TESE was 1.5 times more likely (95% confidence interval 1.4-1.6) to result in successful SR as compared with cTESE. Similarly, in a direct comparison, performance of cTESE was 2.0 times more likely (95% confidence interval 1.8-2.2) to result in successful SR as compared with TESA. Because of inconsistent reporting, evaluation of other procedural characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was not possible.

CONCLUSION(S)

Sperm retrieval was higher for micro-TESE compared with cTESE and for cTESE compared with TESA. Standardization of reported outcomes as well as combining all available SR data would help to further elucidate the SRs of these procedures.

Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment

PURPOSE

Varicocele repair in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was occasionally associated to ejaculated spermatozoa independently from clinical and laboratory measures. We performed a prospective study in infertile men affected by NOA and left side varicocele to find whether or not the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after varicocele repair is predicted by baseline measures.

METHODS

Patients with NOA and grade II, or grade III left side varicocele were submitted to hormone analysis and to scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDU). Azoospermia was confirmed in 23 patients aged 25-47 years who were than submitted to varicocele repair through a retrograde internal spermatic vein embolization. Patients were re-evaluated after 6 months.

RESULTS

Six months after varicocele repair 12 patients (52.2 %) were still azoospermic (Group 1) while 11 patients (47.8 %) reported ejaculated spermatozoa (Group 2) [sperm count: 1.3 × 10(6)/mL; 0.5 × 10(6)/mL-1.6 × 10(6)/mL (median 25th-75th centiles)]. Serum baseline FSH was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.012), while no differences between groups were revealed for all other clinical and laboratory parameters. ROC analysis indicated that baseline FSH level predicted the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment [AUC = 0.811; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.6-0.9; p = 0.0029]. A cut-off level of FSH <10.06 mIU/mL identified 82.0 % of cases with ejaculated spermatozoa with a specificity of 81.8 % and a sensitivity of 83.3 %.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with NOA may show ejaculated spermatozoa after a non-invasive repair of a left side varicocele, therefore avoiding testicular sperm extraction. Baseline serum FSH was a valuable predictor for ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

[Selection of the sites for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: A report of 56 cases of epididymal obstructive azoospermia]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prediction of the site for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (VE) in the treatment of epididymal obstructive azoospermia (OA).

METHODS

This study involved 56 infertile men with confirmed OA whose obstruction was suspected to be in the epididymis. Based on their medical history and results of preoperative physical examination and ultrasonography, we predicted the sites for VE. We performed surgical scrotal exploration for the status of epididymal obstruction, conducted palpation and microscopic observation for the epididymal tubules to be anastomosed, and finally decided on the sites for VE by making sure of the presence of motile sperm in the epididymal fluid of the patients. After surgery, we followed up the patients for the rate of pregnancy.

RESULTS

All the patients received bilateral scrotal ultrasonography and surgical scrotal exploration, totaling 112 procedures, including 98 VE procedures. The accuracy rate of the predicted sites for VE was 80.5% (153/190) by medical history and physical examination, 80.3% (90/112) based on the results of ultrasonography, and 87.4% (90/103) according to the first selected epididymal tubules. Of the 28 patients followed up for more than 12 months, motile sperm were found in 19 (67.9% ) at 2 to 12 months and spontaneous pregnancies were achieved in 10 (35.7%), all with the anastomotic sites in the corpus or cauda.

CONCLUSION

Medical history and physical examination contribute to the selection of anastomotic sites and non-invasive scrotal ultrasonography is effective and practical for positioning epididymal obstruction. The epididymal tubules with motile sperm for anastomosis could be easily obtained from the most dilated ones in indurated epididymides.

[Microsurgical treatment of obstructive azoospermia: a report of 76 cases]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and/or vasovasostomy in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia.

METHODS

This study included 76 patients with obstructive azoospermia, 53 treated by bilateral vasoepididymostomy (8 involving the epididymal head, 18 involving the epididymal body, 5 involving the epididymal tail, and 22 involving the epididymal head, body and tail), 14 by unilateral vasoepididymostomy, and the other 9 by unilateral vasoepididymostomy + unilateral vasovasostomy (including cross anastomosis). We followed up the patients for 2 to 16 months for the patency rate, routine semen parameters, and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

The success rate of bilateral vasoepididymostomy, unilateral vasoepididymostomy, and unilateral vasoepididymostomy + unilateral vasovasostomy (including cross anastomosis) were 62.26% (33/53), 35.71% (5/14), and 77.78% (7/9), respectively. The average sperm concentrations in the three groups of patients were (27.9 +/- 5.74), (11.8 +/- 8.33), and (19.9 +/- 7.53) x 10(6)/ml, the average total sperm counts were (65.6 +/- 13.71), (28.0 +/- 15.86), and (69.2 +/- 28.59) x 10(6), and the mean rates of progressively motile sperm were (22.3 +/- 3.18), (11.0 +/- 9.77), and (15.8 +/- 5.05)%, respectively. The success rates of bilateral vasoepididymostomy that involved the epididymal head, body, tail, and all the three parts were 62.5, 72.22, 60, and 54.55%, respectively. Natural pregnancy was achieved in 8 (10.53%) of the total number of cases.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgery is effective for the treatment obstructive azoospermia. Unilateral vasoepididymostomy + unilateral vasovasostomy is superior to the other procedures, followed by bilateral vasoepididymostomy. Bilateral vasoepididymostomy involving the epididymal body may achieve a slightly better effect than that involving the other epididymal parts.

Hybrid method of transurethral resection of ejaculatory ducts using holmium:yttriumaluminium garnet laser on complete ejaculatory duct obstruction

A 32-year old single man presented with azoospermia and low semen volume which was noted one and half a year ago. Transrectal ultrasonography and seminal vesiculography were performed to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction, and transurethral resection of the ejaculatory duct was performed using a hybrid technique of holmium:yttriumaluminium garnet laser with monopolar transurethral resection to overcome the narrow prostatic urethra. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the successful outcome of a hybrid technique applied for transurethral resection of the ejaculatory duct.

Laboratory processing and intracytoplasmic sperm injection using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa: what can be done to improve outcomes?

There are two main reasons why sperm may be absent from semen. Obstructive azoospermia is the result of a blockage in the male reproductive tract; in this case, sperm are produced in the testicle but are trapped in the epididymis. Non-obstructive azoospermia is the result of severely impaired or non-existent sperm production. There are three different sperm-harvesting procedures that obstructive azoospermic males can undergo, namely MESA (microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration), PESA (percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration), and TESA (testicular sperm aspiration). These three procedures are performed by fine-gauge needle aspiration of epididymal fluid that is examined by an embryologist. Additionally, one technique, called TESE (testicular sperm extraction), is offered for males with non-obstructive azoospermia. In this procedure, a urologist extracts a piece of tissue from the testis. Then, an embryologist minces the tissue and uses a microscope to locate sperm. Finding sperm in the testicular tissue can be a laborious 2- to 3-hour process depending on the degree of sperm production and the etiology of testicular failure. Sperm are freed from within the seminiferous tubules and then dissected from the surrounding testicular tissue. It is specifically these situations that require advanced reproductive techniques, such as ICSI, to establish a pregnancy. This review describes eight different lab processing techniques that an embryologist can use to harvest sperm. Additionally, sperm cryopreservation, which allows patients to undergo multiple ICSI cycles without the need for additional surgeries, will also be discussed.

Microsurgical transverse 2-suture intussusception vasoepididymostomy: effectiveness and rationality

BACKGROUND

2-Suture longitudinal vasoepididymostomy shows superiority to transverse technique in an animal study; to date, this has not been consistently confirmed in human body. In the present study, we evaluated the effectiveness of 2-suture transverse intussusception vasoepididymostomy and compared the rationality between transverse and longitudinal techniques.

METHODS

From May 2007 to December 2008, we performed 2-suture transverse vasoepididymostomy in 19 consecutive patients, as described by Marmar with modification. Between March 2009 and January 2010, the internal diameter of the vas lumen and the outer diameter of the epididymal tube were measured using microruler (21 patients and 37 sides).

RESULTS

Three patients lost to follow-up. At the first follow-up period (ranged from 10 to 24 months), the patency rate was 56.3% (9/16) and the natural pregnancy rate was 25% (4/16). At the second follow-up period (ranged from 46 to 63 months), the patency rate was 68.8% (11/16), the natural pregnancy rate was 37.5% (6/16), respectively, and the take-home baby rate was 31.3% (5/16). The diameter of the vas lumen and the outer diameter of the epididymal tubule were (0.512 ± 0.046) mm and (0.572 ± 0.051) mm (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transverse 2-suture intussusception vasoepididymostomy is still an effective technique in treating obstructive azoospermia.