Surgical versus Medical Treatment of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia: A Cost Comparison

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the cost associated with surgical versus interferon-alpha 2b (IFNα2b) treatment for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN).

DESIGN

A matched, case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 98 patients with OSSN, 49 of whom were treated surgically and 49 of whom were treated medically.

METHODS

Patients with OSSN treated with IFNα2b were matched to patients treated with surgery on the basis of age and date of treatment initiation. Financial cost to the patient was calculated using 2 different methods (hospital billing and Medicare allowable charges) and compared between the 2 groups. These fees included physician fees (clinic, pathology, anesthesia, and surgery), facility fees (clinic, pathology, and operating room), and medication costs. Time invested by patients was calculated in terms of number of visits to the hospital and compared between the 2 groups. Parking costs, transportation, caregiver wages, and lost wages were not considered in our analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of clinic visits and cost of therapy as represented by both hospital charges and Medicare allowable charges.

RESULTS

When considering cost in terms of time, the medical group had an average of 2 more visits over 1 year compared with the surgical group. Cost as represented by hospital charges was higher in the surgical group (mean, $17 598; standard deviation [SD], $7624) when compared with the IFNα2b group (mean, $4986; SD, $2040). However, cost between the 2 groups was comparable when calculated on the basis of Medicare allowable charges (surgical group: mean, $3528; SD, $1610; medical group: mean, $2831; SD, $1082; P = 1.00). The highest cost in the surgical group was the excisional biopsy (hospital billing $17 598; Medicare allowable $3528), and the highest cost in the medical group was interferon ($1172 for drops, average 8.0 bottles; $370 for injections, average 5.4 injections).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data in this group of patients previously demonstrated equal efficacy of surgical versus medical treatment. In this article, we consider costs of therapy and found that medical treatment involved two more office visits, whereas surgical treatment could be more or equally costly depending on insurance coverage.

Cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies after treatment for high-grade anal dysplasia in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Anal cancer is one of the most common cancers affecting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected male patients. Currently, there is no consensus on posttreatment surveillance of HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) who have been treated for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), the likely precursor to anal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a range of strategies for anal cancer surveillance in HIV-infected MSM previously treated for HGAIN.

METHODS

We developed a Markov model to project quality-adjusted life expectancy, lifetime costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 5 strategies using high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) and/or anal cytology testing after treatment.

RESULTS

Performing HRA alone at 6- and 12-month visits was associated with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $4446 per quality-adjusted life year gained. In comparison, combined HRA and anal cytology at both visits provided greater health benefit at a cost of $17,373 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Our results were robust over a number of scenarios and assumptions including patients' level of immunosuppression. Results were most sensitive to test characteristics and cost, as well as progression rates of normal to HGAIN and HGAIN to cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that combined HRA and anal cytology at 6 and 12 months may be a cost-effective surveillance strategy after treatment of HGAIN in HIV-infected MSM.

Compliance and efficiency before and after implementation of a clinical practice guideline for laryngeal carcinomas

We evaluated whether the implementation of a nationwide clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of laryngeal carcinomas led to changes in hospital costs, balanced against clinical changes observed following the guideline's implementation. Charts of 822 patients with larynx carcinoma (459 treated before the introduction of the guideline and 363 thereafter) in five hospitals were retrospectively investigated. In all phases, no differences in total hospital costs were observed after the guideline's implementation. Total mean costs were Euro 3,207 (95%CI 3,091-3,395) for diagnosis, Euro 3,169 (2,153-4,182), Euro 5,026 (3,996-6,057), Euro 6,458 (5,579-7,337), Euro 8,037 (7,469-8,606), Euro 12,765 (10,763-14,769), Euro 19,227 (16,848-21,605) for treatment of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, T1, T2, T3 and T4 carcinoma, respectively, and Euro 1,856 (1,491-2,220) for 1 year disease-free follow-up. In an earlier study, we observed several positive changes after the guideline's implementation. Balanced against the equal costs before and after the guideline's implementation, we conclude that the efficiency of the care process improved.

Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained.

RESULTS

For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was 3300 US dollars despite an initial RT cost of 8700 US dollars due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 36,700 US dollars/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.

Quality of life, functional outcome, and costs of early glottic cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze quality of life, functional outcome, and hidden costs by primary treatment with surgery or radiation therapy in patients with early glottic cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study in a tertiary care facility.

METHODS

A group of 101 patients with carcinoma in situ and T1 invasive squamous cell carcinoma treated primarily with either surgery or radiation, between January 1990 and December 2000, were identified from searching our tumor registry. Patients completed two previously validated questionnaires and one local questionnaire. Statistical significance was assessed with the rank sum test, chi2 test, or Fisher's Exact test.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed in 59% (44 of 74) of the surgical cohort and 41% (11 of 27) of the radiation therapy cohort. The primary surgical treatments were endoscopic excision (86%), hemilaryngectomy (12%), and total laryngectomy (1%). Patient-reported problems with swallowing, chewing, speech, taste, saliva, pain, activity, recreation, and appearance showed no difference between the endoscopic excision or radiation therapy cohorts. Comparing endoscopic excision versus radiation therapy, respectively, median number of treatments (2 vs. 35), total median travel distance (150 vs. 660 miles), total median travel time (180 vs. 1440 min), and total median number of hours of work missed (76 vs. 24) all differed significantly (P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all patients with early glottic cancer, whether treated with surgery or radiation therapy, reported excellent quality of life outcomes and functional results. In addition to actual costs, the hidden costs for radiation therapy versus endoscopic excision were all greater in terms of total number of hours of work missed, total travel time, and total travel distance.

Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and uterine cervical cancer: a screening strategy in the perspective of rural India

The predominance of cervical cancer in India can mostly be attributed to the lack of early screening. The objective of the present study has been, therefore, to determine a cost-effective oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening plan for rural Indian women. The results showed that in normal women, highest prevalence of HPV 16/18 infection was in the age group < or =23 years and lowest in > or =44 years with an insignificant change in between. HPV 16/18 infection was significantly associated with cervical erosion at age < or =23 years, but not with cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid testing at any age. The low-grade cytological lesions, however, increased only with increase in age. Fourteen per cent of the cervical malignancy was also found to be present in the age group 24-33 years with an 87% HPV infection. Here we proposed a cost-effective screening scheme in which HPV testing must be performed in women (a) < or =23 years with cervical erosion and (b) 24-43 years, as an adjunct to Pap smears (both HPV and cytology were prevalent in this group). For women > or =44 years, HPV testing might not be useful, since abnormal cytology was more prominent over the viral infection. We infer that by not performing HPV test in the group < or =23 years, approximately 76% of the high-risk HPV-infected individuals potentially "at risk" for developing cervical cancer might be missed.

Decreased incidence of cervical cancer in medicare-eligible California women

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the incidence of invasive cervical cancer relative to carcinoma in situ decreased in Medicare-eligible women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was amassed from the California Cancer Registry database. The hypothesis was prospectively specified. Mean ratio of invasive (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stages I-IV) to in situ cervical carcinoma in 1988-1990 versus 1991-1995 was stratified by age (24 or younger, 25-44, 45-64, 65 or older) and race (all races, whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders).

RESULTS

The mean ratio of invasive to in situ cervical cancer incidence for women at least 65 years old was lower in 1991-1995 compared with 1988-1990 (P <.001, 95% confidence interval 0.893, 0.954); and had decreased more than observed for women aged 45-64 and 25-44, for all races combined, and for white women. The decreased ratio of invasive to in situ cancer for blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders at least 65 years old was no different than the decreased ratio in younger women.

CONCLUSION

In California, in the 5 years after the 1990 change in Medicare funding statutes for cervical cytology screening, the ratio of invasive cervical cancer to in situ disease decreased more in Medicare-eligible patients than in younger women.

Institutional validation of breast cancer treatment guidelines

Several groups have developed clinical guidelines for the management of breast cancer, yet little data exist regarding their validation. Therefore, we examined the effect of published National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for invasive breast cancer on survival, quality of life (QOL), and hospital cost. From 260 consecutive breast cancer patients, 129 patients were identified for analysis: 93 patients (72%) were treated according to the guidelines (NCCN+), while the treatment of 36 patients (28%), with a similar stage distribution, deviated from the guidelines (NCCN-). Patients were excluded from analysis with a diagnosis of carcinoma in situ, inflammatory cancer, stage IV disease, and comorbid conditions that affected treatment. The 5-year survival was 87.6% for the NCCN+ patients versus 83.3% for NCCN- patients (P = 0.319 by Kaplan-Meier). Twelve QOL parameters were evaluated using a Likert-type scale (1 = severe and 5 = none). NCCN+ patients had a cumulative QOL score of 4.18 +/- 0.08 versus 4.24 +/- 0.14 for NCCN- patients (P = 0.745). Treatment-related costs were $20,300 +/- 1800 for NCCN+ patients versus $59,700 +/- 25,200 for NCCN- patients (P = 0.016 by t test). Although deviation from NCCN breast cancer guidelines had no effect on perceived quality of life or survival, there was a significant decrease in cost in the NCCN+ group. These findings suggest that adherence to NCCN guidelines can significantly reduce the cost of breast cancer care without adversely affecting either survival or quality of life.

Management of patients with Bacilli Calmette-Guérin-refractory carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder: cost implications of a clinical trial for valrubicin

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to identify the expected first- and second-year clinical costs associated with intravesical valrubicin therapy, using a decision analytic model, for patients with Bacilli Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-refractory carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the urinary bladder.

BACKGROUND

Cancer of the urinary bladder is the fourth most common malignancy in men and the sixth most common noncutaneous carcinoma overall. One histopathologic stage of bladder cancer is CIS, for which BCG intravesical immunotherapy is the first-line therapy. Radical cystectomy has been recommended for patients with CIS who do not respond to or become refractory to therapy with BCG. Surgery, however, may not be appropriate for all patients, especially those who are ineligible for the lengthy procedure because of advanced age or comorbidities and those who prefer alternative nonsurgical management. For these groups, intravesical valrubicin therapy is a plausible alternative.

METHODS

Models were developed and populated with data from 1 open-label study of 90 patients, information from the medical literature, and input from clinical experts. The analysis was conducted from the payor perspective for direct costs only.

RESULTS

Our data indicate that first- and second-year expected costs for valrubicin therapy are $19,912 and $23,496, respectively. Expected cost for radical cystectomy was also evaluated, since some patients may have no other option if drug therapy fails.

CONCLUSION

Our cost-consequence analysis and clinical data provide decision-makers with tools to aid in global budgetary projections of fractional and total expected health care costs associated with the management BCG-refractory CIS of the urinary bladder.

See-and-treat in the management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: a resource utilization analysis

OBJECTIVE

To use activity-based costing techniques to compare see-and-treat with conventional evaluation and treatment of women presenting with a screening Papanicolaou smear demonstrating high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL).

METHODS

A total of 4000 theoretical patients were assumed to be evaluated and treated following one of four management algorithms: conventional algorithm I, with colposcopy and directed biopsies, followed by cryotherapy or cold-knife conization; conventional algorithm II, substituting the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cold-knife conization; conventional algorithm III, substituting the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cold-knife conization and cryotherapy; or see-and-treat algorithm IV, using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Costs associated with patient management in each algorithm were calculated including those for the procedure, patient time, physician time, and disposable expenses, as well as costs to manage complications, treatment failures, and follow-up for 1 year.

RESULTS

Algorithm I was the most expensive, costing $899,405 for 1000 patients with high-grade SIL. Substituting the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cold-knife conization (algorithm II) decreased the cost by 32%, whereas substituting it for cryotherapy also (algorithm III) reduced the cost by only 25%. The most cost-effective management was the see-and-treat single visit of algorithm IV. This strategy cost $531,281, offering a 41% cost reduction compared with algorithm I.

CONCLUSION

A see-and-treat approach to the management of women with high-grade SIL, although incorporating more procedures, offers significant cost savings over conventional management algorithms.

[Results of stereotactic guidance of breast excisional biopsy versus stereotactic core biopsy in occult breast lesions]

Interventional procedures, whether markings or core biopsies, are very important for clarifying non-palpable breast lesions. Both at present as well as in future--in the age of breast screening--such methods must be used more and more. Although breast screening is not carried out on an organized basis in our country, it is gaining importance. Currently there is a covert screening in progress and women are availing this facility to an increasing extent. Various organisations including the press and audio-visual media have arisen the interest of the population. An increase in diagnostic studies is being flanked by an increase in surgical activity. As a result, on the one hand a larger number of small carcinomas as well as benign lesions are being operated. This has brought the cost-bearers, i.e. all of us, to the limits of what can be done. Surgery costs money. One solution to the problem is preoperative marking which is used in all patients suspected of carcinoma, and the other is core biopsy which is used in lesions that appear benign on X-rays. Radiologically benign lesions are not histological diagnoses. Although a well trained radiologist will make the correct diagnosis in 95 to 98% of cases, the possibility of error is still 2 to 50%. In the light of this knowledge, it would appear logical to operate all apparently benign lesions. However, a more intensive use of bioptic procedures is a solution to this problem. To compare costs: Surgery for clarification of a lesion involves a hospital stay of about 3 days while bioptic studies can be carried out on an outpatient basis. Besides, surgery costs 2 to 3 times more than bioptic studies, depending on the hospital and the bioptic material used. A core biopsy needle costs about two-thirds the price of a rotating cannula. However, it should be emphasized that core biopsy is not a method of treatment and will never be one. It should remain a diagnostic procedure, although small lesions may well be aspirated by this method. The ABBI systems is intended to be a therapeutic method. At present, no final statement can be made about the utility of this procedure.

Excising the reexcision: stereotactic core-needle biopsy decreases need for reexcision of breast cancer

There is debate regarding use of the stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB) for highly suspicious mammographic lesions. This study compares a serial group of mammography-detected breast cancer patients treated before and after the use of SCNB. We studied 113 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers between 1994 and 1996. Altogether 47 patients were diagnosed by wire-localized breast biopsy (wire group) and the next 66 consecutive breast cancer patients by SCNB (stereo group). Negative margins were found more often in the stereo group than in the wire group (77% vs. 38%, p < 0.001). Reexcision was required more frequently in the wire group than in the stereo group (68% vs. 21%, p < 0.001), and one-staged surgical procedures were done more often in the stereo group than the wire group (79% vs. 21%, p < 0.001). The volume of the initial wide excision was much larger in the stereo group than in the wire group (p = 0.002). Those in the wire group required 50% more operations per patient (1.8 vs. 1.2) than the stereo group. A significant cost savings can be estimated in the stereo group compared with the wire group. The use of SCNB was associated with breast excisions of larger volume, negative margins, and decreased need for reexcision. Simultaneous adjunct procedures resulted in one-stage operations, improving cost savings. The use of SCNB for nonpalpable breast cancer benefits the patient, the surgeon, and the payor. It should be undertaken prior to the first surgical procedure.

Has radiotherapy become too expensive to be considered a treatment option for early glottic cancer?

BACKGROUND

External beam radiotherapy and surgery produce equivalent long-term survival and tumor control in early glottic cancer. The expense and cost of radiotherapy have been challenged.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for 57 patients undergoing radiotherapy for glottic cancer. End points included local tumor control, relapse-free survival, cause-specific survival, medical charges, and costs. The results were compared with those of 265 patients who underwent transoral endoscopic removal or an open laryngeal procedure at the same institution.

RESULTS

The local control, larynx preservation, re-treatment, voice quality, relapse-free survival, and cancer death results and medical charges and costs are reported by treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy provides at least equivalent, if not superior, local tumor control, larynx preservation, voice quality, and survival, compared with the surgical options. Overall medical charges and costs for radiotherapy are similar to transoral endoscopic resection and less than partial vertical laryngectomy.

Cost-effective analysis of mass screening for cervical cancer in Japan

Cost-effectiveness analysis for cervical cancer screening in Japan was performed to estimate the cost per life-year saved by the screening; cost-effectiveness ratio (CER). The analysis was made using a simulation model to estimate long-term cost and effectiveness of the screening programs. CER of cervical cancer screening was estimated to be US$ 40,604 which was 2.4 times more expensive than that for gastric cancer screening but was about the same as that for colorectal cancer screening. It was within the range of cost-effectiveness of other cancer screening programs financed under the Health and Medical Services Law for the Aged in Japan. We performed sensitivity analysis on the following seven estimates, the screening charge, the sensitivity and the specificity of the screening test, the frequency of carcinoma in situ (CIS) among cases detected in the screening program, the initial cost and the terminal cost for patients with invasive cancer, and the incidence rate of cervical cancer. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the screening charge was the most influential factor on CER. CER was fairly stable under various assumptions on the accuracy of the screening test, the frequency of carcinoma in situ (CIS), the treatment cost for patient, and the incidence of cervical cancer. CER was less sensitive to the changes in incidence, even to as low as a 50% decrease of the current figure. Then if the incidence rate becomes 85% of the current figure in 2015, CER would be US$ 48,176 and it was suggested that the cervical cancer screening would remain reasonably cost-effective until the year 2015.

[Cost-benefit analysis of the Program for Early Screening of Cervico-uterine Cancer]

OBJECTIVE

Previous researches pointed out the critical changes needed to increase the efficiency of the National Screening Programme of Cervical Cancer in Mexico. These changes were assessed through a cost-benefit analysis. This paper presents the results of that appraisal. Figures are presented as US Dollars of 1996 valued as 7.5 pesos for each dollar.

RESULTS

The operational unitary cost of the integral process of the cytology-the obtention of the Pap smear, its transportation to the interpretation centre, its analysis, and the notification of results to users-was estimated in US$ 11.6. If the proposed changes are operated, the cost of each citology would increase by 32.7%. The benefit/cost ratio would be 2 and the net benefit of 88 millions of US dollars for the next five years.

CONCLUSIONS

The operation of the proposed changes is socially desirable, but should be supported the training activities of the personnel, the increase of the coverage of women at risk, the quality control activities, the monitoring of the program and the communication with women detected as positive cases.

Management of superficial bladder cancer in a community setting

Over the past four or five years, the urologist in private practice has gained experience using mitomycin in the treatment of superficial bladder cancers. Indications for use of mitomycin include carcinoma in situ (CIS), more than two or three recurrences on successive cytoscopic examinations of superficial transitional cell carcinomas, the presence of multiple transitional cell carcinomas at the time of initial examination when it was believed that all tumor could not be removed cystoscopically, and prophylaxis. The regimen for mitomycin has changed over time; currently the standard regimen is 40 mg mitomycin in 40 cc sterile water given intravesically once a week for eight weeks followed by routine cystoscopic examinations every three months and maintenance therapy, if indicated, of 40 mg mitomycin once a month. Results following use of this regimen in private practice have been most encouraging. Complications have been minimal. Only 1 patient had to discontinue therapy because of side effects, and 1 patient underwent radical cystectomy for recurrent disease after partial cystectomy and mitomycin therapy. Patients still receiving treatment include 1 patient who had not responded after initial treatment and who is being followed up for possible recurrence. Mitomycin therapy appears to be effective in controlling superficial bladder cancer and, possibly, carcinoma in situ, with minimal side effects and good patient compliance.