Despite the Safety of Preoperative Cefazolin for Patients With Non-anaphylactic Penicillin Allergy, 20% of Practitioners Avoid Its Use

Cefazolin is commonly used for surgical site infection prophylaxis due to its low cost and effective coverage. However, it is controversial to use cefazolin in patients with a penicillin allergy despite the cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin being only 1%. Ample literature shows that it is safe to use cefazolin in patients with non-anaphylactic penicillin allergies. However, there is often hesitation by anesthesiologists or orthopedists when prescribing this medication in this population. The current authors sent a 16-question survey to all the residency programs in the United States in anesthesiology and orthopedics asking physicians affiliated with these programs to answer a series of questions about their demographics, prescribing patterns, and knowledge of the cross-reactivity between penicillin and cefazolin. A total of 146 responses in each group, with 82.9% (n=121) of orthopedists and 78.8% (n=115) of anesthesiologists preferring cefazolin for patients with non-anaphylactic penicillin allergies. However, only 57.5% of anesthesiologists and 41.1% of orthopedists knew the correct cross-reactivity between cephalosporins and penicillin. If a provider knew the correct cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin, he or she had an increased odds of prescribing cefazolin to patients with nonanaphylactic penicillin allergies (orthopedics odds ratio [OR], 4.77, P<.01; anesthesiologists OR, 3.59, P<.01). Therefore, this study supports that further education of orthopedic and anesthesia providers about the cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin would lead to more evidence-based, cost-effective care. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):e437-e442.].

Selective hypersensitivity to cefazolin and contribution of the basophil activation test

The authors present 2 case reports of selective cefazolin hypersensitivity: a 49 year-old woman with a history of two perioperative reactions (urticaria and severe anaphylaxis) after the use of rocuronium, propophol and cefazolin; a 36 year-old pregnant woman who developed facial erythema, lips angioedema and hypotension immediately after administration of ropivacain, sufentanil, cefazolin, oxytocin and ephedrine. In both cases, intradermal skin tests were positive for cefazolin. A basophil activation test was performed for cefazolin, which was positive in one patient. Oral challenge tests with penicillin, amoxicillin and other cephalosporins were negative. This selective hypersensitivity to cefazolin may be associated with a R1-side chain different from other beta-lactams.

Anaphylaxis to cefazolin during labor secondary to prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus: a case report

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is an uncommon event during pregnancy, but if it does arise, it can lead to serious fetal consequences even if there are no serious long-term maternal complications.

CASE

A parturient developed anaphylaxis in the labor unit shortly after intravenous cefazolin chemoprophylaxis had begun for perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Prompt treatment for anaphylaxis commenced, involving the administration of epinephrine and glucocorticoids, and an emergency cesarean section spared the mother serious morbidity, with a favorable perinatal outcome for the fetus.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first reported one of anaphylaxis to cefazolin in pregnancy secondary to prophylaxis against for B Streptococcus. The case demonstrates that a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction can occur at any time during pregnancy and that all staff in a maternal unit should be familiar with the management of perinatal anaphylaxis.

Antigen specific quantification of sulfidoleukotrienes in patients allergic to Betalactam antibiotics

BACKGROUND

After in vitro allergen-specific stimulation, basophils become activated and release sulfidoleukotrienes LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4. This can be detected by means of the CAST assay. We assessed the positivity criteria and the reliability of antigen-specific sulfidoleukotriene production (CAST) in the in vitro diagnosis of betalactam (BL) allergic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied a sample of 67 patients (age 48.94 +/- 15.76 years) who had presented with anaphylaxis or urticaria-angioedema within the first 60 minutes after administration of Amoxicillin (54/67), Penicillin G (7/67), Cefuroxime (5/67) or Cefazoline (1/67). All of them had a positive skin test to at least one of the antigenic determinants of Penicillin. As control group 30 adults with negative skin tests who tolerated BL were included. All of them underwent skin tests, oral provocation tests, specific IgE (CAP-FEIA, Pharmacia) and CAST.

RESULTS

Positivity criteria were established by means of ROC curves: a sLT release induced by Betalactams of at least 100 pg/ml and greater than or equal to 3 times the basal value. The overall sensitivity of CAST is 47.7% and specificity 83.3%. Sensitivity of specific IgE is 37.8% and specificity 83.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established validated positivity criteria for the CAST technique in patients allergic to Betalactams. This technique is a useful in vitro diagnostic method in patients with IgE-mediated allergy to Betalactam antibiotics.

Allergy to cefazolin: study of in vivo cross reactivity with other betalactams

We present two cases of hypersensitivity to cefazolin (one anaphylaxis). The skin prick tests with cefazolin at therapeutic concentration were positive. For the in vitro study we used conjugates of cefazolin with human serum albumin, obtaining a positive result in the histamine release test in both patients. In one case, we demonstrated anticefazolin-specific IgE antibodies by RAST. The controls did not react to any of these tests. Finally, we carried out skin tests and challenge tests with other betalactam antibiotics, including benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, aztreonam, cefuroxime and cefotaxime, showing in both patients good tolerance to all these drugs.

Influences of cephem antibiotics on the immune response in mice

The effects of six cephem antibiotics, including ceftezole, cefmetazole, cefoxitin, cefotiam, cefoperazone, and cefotaxime, on murine humoral immunity were examined. In female BDF1 mice each cephem antibiotic was administered at a dose of 800 mg/kg/day i.v. for 7 consecutive days. Among the antibiotics tested, only ceftezole and cefoperazone induced a significant increase in serum total IgM, but not in serum total IgG. Especially in case of ceftezole, the mice developed splenomegaly due to the proliferation of IgM-producing cells in the germinal centers. The proliferation of splenic IgM-producing cells was also observed in female thymus-deficient Balb/c-nu/nu mice receiving intravenous ceftezole. Thus, the drug was indicated to enhance the polyclonal IgM production in mice by acting as a B cell mitogen. This is consistent with the in vitro finding that ceftezole exhibited a mitogenic effect on whole spleen cells from BDF1 mice, but not on B cell depleted spleen cells.