Evaluation of cardiac electrophysiological features in patients with premature adrenarche

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the cardiac effects of hyperandrogenism in premature adrenarche (PA) and evaluate the risk of arrhythmia development.

METHODS

Fifty patients with PA and 50 healthy children from a pediatric endocrinology outpatient clinic were included in the study. The patients underwent echocardiography and electrocardiographic evaluations. Conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler echocardiography, repolarization time, and repolarization dispersion time were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age in the PA and control groups was 7.91 years (5.83-9.25), 8.08 years (5.75-9.33), respectively. Thirty percent of patients in the PA group were male. While mitral early diastolic velocity deceleration time (DT), isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT), and E/e' ratio were significantly higher in the PA group than in the control group, mitral lateral annulus tissue Doppler early diastolic velocity was significantly lower (p=0.0001, 0.0001, 0.003, 0.0001). While P wave dispersion (PWD), Tpe, and QT-dispersion (QT-d) values were significantly higher in the PA group than in the control group, the P minimum value was significantly lower in the PA group (p=0.0001, 0.02, 0.004, and 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Early subclinical diastolic dysfunction was observed in the PA group. There was an increased risk of atrial arrhythmia with PWD and an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia with increased Tpe and QT-d. There was a correlation between testosterone levels and diastolic function parameters. The increased risk of atrial arrhythmia is closely related to diastolic function.

Right ventricular-arterial uncoupling as an independent prognostic factor in acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction accompanied with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV)-arterial uncoupling is a powerful independent predictor of prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Coronary artery disease (CAD) can contribute to the pathophysiological characteristics of HFpEF. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of RV-arterial uncoupling in acute HFpEF patients with CAD.

METHODS

This prospective study included 250 consecutive acute HFpEF patients with CAD. Patients were divided into RV-arterial uncoupling and coupling groups by the optimal cutoff value, based on a receiver operating characteristic curve of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, recurrent ischemic events, and HF hospitalizations.

RESULTS

TAPSE/PASP ≤0.43 provided good accuracy in identifying patients with RV-arterial uncoupling (area under the curve, 0.731; sensitivity, 61.4%; and specificity, 76.6%). Of the 250 patients, 150 and 100 patients could be grouped into the RV-arterial coupling (TAPSE/PASP >0.43) and uncoupling (TAPSE/PASP ≤0.43) groups, respectively. Revascularization strategies were slightly different between groups; the RV-arterial uncoupling group had a lower rate of complete revascularization (37.0% [37/100] vs . 52.7% [79/150], P <0.001) and a higher rate of no revascularization (18.0% [18/100] vs . 4.7% [7/150], P <0.001) compared to the RV-arterial coupling group. The cohort with TAPSE/PASP ≤0.43 had a significantly worse prognosis than the cohort with TAPSE/PASP >0.43. Multivariate Cox analysis showed TAPSE/PASP ≤0.43 as an independent associated factor for the primary endpoint, all-cause death, and recurrent HF hospitalization (hazard ratios [HR]: 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-3.39, P <0.001; HR: 3.32, 95% CI: 1.30-8.47, P = 0.012; and HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.10-3.37, P = 0.021, respectively), but not for recurrent ischemic events (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.75-2.90, P = 0.257).

CONCLUSION

RV-arterial uncoupling, based on TAPSE/PASP, is independently associated with adverse outcomes in acute HFpEF patients with CAD.

Additional Prognostic Value of Tissue Doppler Evaluation in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Left-Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement

Background and Objectives: Patients with surgical aortic stenosis (AS) show impaired diastolic filling, which is a risk factor for early and late mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR). There is a paucity of information concerning the impact of restrictive diastolic filling and the evolution of diastolic dysfunction in the early and medium terms post-AVR. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of the presence of a restrictive left-ventricular (LV) diastolic filling pattern (LVDFP) and dilated left atrium (LA) in patients with AS and LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 40%) who underwent AVR, and to define the independent predictors for immediate and long-term prognosis and their value for preoperative risk estimation. Materials and Methods: The study was prospective and included 197 patients with surgical AS and LVEF <40% who underwent AVR. Preoperative echocardiographic examinations were repeated at day 10, at 1, 3 and 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery, with evaluation of LVEF, diastolic function and LA dimension index (mm/m2). Depending on LV systolic performance, patients were classified as Group A (LVEF: 30−40%) or Group B (LVEF < 30%). Results: The main echographic independent parameters for early and late postoperative death were: restrictive LVDFP, significant pulmonary hypertension, LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) >55 mm and the presence of second-degree mitral regurgitation. Restrictive LVDFP and LA dimension >30 mm/m2 were independent predictors for fatal outcome (p = 0.0017). Conclusions: Assessment of diastolic function and LA dimension are reliable parameters in predicting fatal outcome and hospitalization for heart failure, having an independent and incremental prognostic value in patients with surgical AS. Complete evaluation of LVDFP with all the echographic measurements (including TDI) should routinely be part of the preoperative assessment of patients with LV systolic dysfunction undergoing AVR.

Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension

RATIONALE

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is recommended for screening for the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, some recent studies have suggested that Doppler echocardiographic pulmonary artery pressure estimates may frequently be inaccurate.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography for estimating pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study on patients with various forms of PH who underwent comprehensive Doppler echocardiography within 1 hour of a clinically indicated right-heart catheterization to compare noninvasive hemodynamic estimates with invasively measured values.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 65 patients completed the study protocol. Using Bland-Altman analytic methods, the bias for the echocardiographic estimates of the pulmonary artery systolic pressure was -0.6 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from +38.8 to -40.0 mm Hg. Doppler echocardiography was inaccurate (defined as being greater than +/-10 mm Hg of the invasive measurement) in 48% of cases. Overestimation and underestimation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure by Doppler echocardiography occurred with a similar frequency (16 vs. 15 instances, respectively). The magnitude of pressure underestimation was greater than overestimation (-30 +/- 16 vs. +19 +/- 11 mm Hg; P = 0.03); underestimates by Doppler also led more often to misclassification of the severity of the PH. For cardiac output measurement, the bias was -0.1 L/min with 95% limits of agreement ranging from +2.2 to -2.4 L/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler echocardiography may frequently be inaccurate in estimating pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output in patients being evaluated for PH.

The impact of emission power on the destruction of echo contrast agents and on the origin of tissue harmonic signals using power pulse-inversion imaging

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of emission power on ultrasound (US)-induced destruction of echocontrast microbubbles during real-time power pulse inversion imaging (PPI) in myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and to evaluate the magnitude of noncontrast PPI signals arising from myocardial tissue at variable emission power to define the cut-off emission power for optimal MCE using low power technologies. In vitro studies were performed in a flow phantom using Optison, Definity and AFO 150. PPI signal intensity during real-time imaging at 27 Hz was compared with intermittent imaging at 0.1 Hz to evaluate bubble destruction at variable emission power (MI: 0.09 to 1.3). In healthy volunteers, PPI signal intensities during constant infusion of Optison(R) was studied in real-time PPI 22 HZ and during intermittent imaging triggered end-systolic frames every, every 3rd and every 5th cardiac cycle. In addition, the impact of emission power on nonlinear PPI signals from myocardial structures was studied. In vitro, there was a 40% decrease of real-time PPI signal intensity for Optison and AFO 150 at lowest emission power (0.09), whereas no signal loss was observed for Definity. Increase of emission power resulted in a faster decay for Optison(R) and AFO 150 as compared to Definity. In vivo, real-time PPI during continuous infusion of Optison(R) resulted in a 40% decrease of myocardial signal intensity as compared to intermittent imaging every 5th cardiac cycle, even at lowest possible emission power (mechanical index = 0.09). There was a strong positive relationship between MI and noncontrast myocardial PPI signals in all myocardial segments. PPI signal intensity was found to be lower than 1 dB only for extremely low emission power (MI < 0.2). Destruction of microbubbles during real-time imaging by use of PPI at low emission power varies considerably for different echo contrast agents. However, bubble destruction and the onset of tissue harmonic signals focus the use of real-time perfusion imaging to very low emission power.

Safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of Doppler-tipped guide wires, intracoronary Doppler flow measurement has been increasingly accepted as an additional diagnostic approach in the catheterization laboratory. However, the safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement has not been well-investigated. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement using the Doppler FloWire (Cardiometrics, Mountain View, Calif).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 906 patients were examined by intracoronary Doppler with a 0.014-inch or an 0.018-inch Doppler FloWire. For coronary flow reserve measurement, intracoronary injection of adenosine or papaverine was used. Of the patients studied, 77 were cardiac transplant recipients and 829 were patients who had not received a transplant, of whom 617 had undergone diagnostic coronary procedures and 212 had coronary interventions. In 27 (2.98%) of 906 patients adverse cardiac events were observed. Fifteen (1.66%) of 906 patients had severe transient bradycardia develop (asystole or second- to third-degree atrioventricular block) after intracoronary administration of adenosine, 14 of which occurred in the right coronary artery and 1 in the left anterior descending artery. Nine (0.99%) of 906 patients had coronary spasm during the passage of the Doppler wire (5 in the right coronary artery, 4 in the left anterior descending artery). Two (0.22%) of 906 patients had ventricular fibrillation during the procedure. Hypotension with bradycardia and ventricular extrasystole each occurred in 1 (0.11%) of 906 patients. The incidence of complication was significantly higher in transplant recipients than in patients who underwent either diagnostic or interventional procedures (12.99% vs 2.43% vs 0.94%, P <.001). The Doppler measurements in the right coronary artery were associated with a higher incidence of complications, especially bradycardia, compared with the left anterior descending and the left circumflex arteries (right coronary, 5.87% vs left anterior descending, 1.05% vs left circumflex, 0.17%; P <.001). All complications were cured medically.

CONCLUSION

Intracoronary Doppler flow measurement with Doppler wires and intracoronary administration of adenosine is a safe method. However, severe complications such as bradycardia and coronary spasm can occur. Attention should be paid to the examination of the right coronary artery, especially in heart transplant recipients.

Assessment of left ventricular ejection dynamics in patients with coronary artery disease during dipyridamole-stress Doppler echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the contribution of Doppler-echocardiographically derived aortic indexes of left ventricular systolic function during dipyridamole-stress to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).

DESIGN

This was a clinical study.

METHODS

Echocardiographic studies under baseline and peak dipyridamole stresses were performed on 15 normal subjects and 32 patients with angiographically confirmed CAD. Peak Doppler velocity, acceleration, and acceleration time of the ascending aorta, as well as segmental left ventricular wall motion, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of wall-motion abnormalities induced by dipyridamole for the detection of CAD were 62.5, 100, and 74.5%, respectively. When wall-motion abnormalities were combined with the percentage changes in peak aortic velocity and acceleration, the overall sensitivities were 84.38 and 78.15%, respectively, the specificities were 66.7 and 80.00%, respectively, and the accuracy was 78.72% for both models. When all three parameters were combined, the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the method were 87.5, 86.7, and 87.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler-echocardiographically derived aortic indexes of left ventricular systolic function during dipyridamole stress could be a useful adjunct to two-dimensional echocardiography by improving its sensitivity in the diagnosis of CAD.

Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography using high resolution imaging in infants and children with congenital heart disease

A transesophageal probe recently has been developed for use in pediatric patients, which incorporates 48 rather than 26 elements, and permits continuous-wave Doppler, and pulsed and color Doppler flow modalities. This probe potentially offers significantly enhanced image quality. To evaluate its capabilities, we tested the probe intraoperatively in 53 infants and children undergoing surgical repair of congenital heart disease, and found that clear echocardiographic images with good detail were provided, including the ability to image coronary arteries in patients weighing as little as 2.7 kg. Imaging detail transesophageally is commensurate with the performance of this system from a transthoracic route. This probe also has the capacity for accurate estimates of high velocity jets using continuous-wave Doppler, which is a relatively new development.

The technique of transesophageal echocardiography. How to procure detailed views of an array of cardiac structures

Use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is growing in ambulatory, intensive care, and intraoperative settings. Forward flexion or retroflexion of the TEE probe tip at different levels in the esophagus reveals a variety of intracardiac structures; in the basal short-axis view, for example, the aortic valve can be seen, as can the left atrial appendage lateral to the aorta and pulmonary artery. In the four-chamber view, the mitral and tricuspid valves and interatrial septum can be viewed, and the morphology of the mitral valve leaflets and mitral annulus can be assessed. Cross-sectional views of both ventricles can be obtained in the transgastric short-axis view. In addition, the entire thoracic aorta, as well as the proximal ascending and transverse arch, can be visualized with TEE.

The clinical role of transoesophageal echocardiography

The role of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated in a consecutive series of 100 procedures performed in 86 patients (age 17-81, mean 56 years). All patients had prior transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). TEE was performed with a 5 MHz phased array transoesophageal transducer with pulsed wave Doppler and colour flow mapping capability. Forty-four per cent of patients received intravenous sedation and 36% received antibiotic prophylaxis. There were no complications of TEE. The TTE and TEE findings were compared. In patients referred for possible cardiac source of embolism, left atrial thrombi were detected in 8/27 TEE studies but in none of 27 TTE studies. In 12 patients with prosthetic valve dysfunction TEE distinguished prosthetic from periprosthetic regurgitation in 9/12 studies compared to 3/12 with TTE. In 11 patients with suspected aortic dissection TEE correctly detected dissection in all seven cases in which the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed, whereas TTE showed only equivocal findings in two cases. Vegetations were detected by TEE in 4/5 studies in patients with proven native valve endocarditis and by TTE in 2/5. No vegetations were detected by TTE or TEE in five studies in patients with proven prosthetic valve endocarditis. Compared with other investigations there were no false positive TEE studies and one possible false negative study. We conclude that TEE is a safe procedure which often provides additional clinical information to transthoracic echocardiography.

Impact of transesophageal color flow Doppler echocardiography in current cardiology practice

Of 3,480 patients who were referred for cardiac ultrasound evaluation, 230 patients (6.6%) underwent transesophageal echocardiography because the transthoracic study was not feasible, technically inadequate, or provided insufficient diagnostic information for optimal patient management. There were 149 inpatients and 81 outpatients. The majority (182 patients, 79%) had aortic or mitral disorders. In 166 patients (72%), transesophageal echocardiography played a significant role in patient management. Transesophageal echocardiography was most useful in evaluating diseases of the aorta (dissection, root abscess, or aneurysm), mitral prosthesis, complications of endocarditis, left atrial appendage thrombi, and in determining the cause of mitral insufficiency. Transesophageal echocardiography was useful in the evaluation of critically ill patients and those with severe lung disease.