Survivorship of the fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mean 14-year follow-up in a single medical center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to report the long-term survival of fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a mean of 14-year follow-up, and to determine possible risk factors of failure.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 337 fixed-bearing medial UKAs implanted between 2003 and 2014. Demographic and radiographic parameters were measured, including pre-operative and post-operative anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and anatomical medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to figure out risk factors.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 14.0 years. There were 32 failures categorized into implant loosening (n = 11), osteoarthritis progression (n = 7), insert wear (n = 7), infection (n = 4), and periprosthetic fracture (n = 3). Cumulative survival was 91.6% at 10 years and 90.0% at 15 years. No statistically significant parameters were found between the overall survival and failure groups. Age and hypertension were significant factors of implant loosening with odds ratio (OR) 0.909 (p = 0.02) and 0.179 (p = 0.04) respectively. In the insert wear group, post-operative aFTA and correction of PTS showed significance with OR 0.363 (p = 0.02) and 0.415 (p = 0.03) respectively. Post-operative aMPTA was a significant factor of periprosthetic fracture with OR 0.680 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The fixed-bearing medial UKA provides successful long-term survivorship. Tibial component loosening is the major cause of failure. Older age and hypertension were factors with decreased risk of implant loosening.

Indications, Clinical Outcomes, and Re-Revisions Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty - Does Age Matter?

BACKGROUND

Younger age is associated with increased revision incidence following primary total hip arthroplasty, though the association between age and repeat revision following revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) has not been described. This study aimed to describe the incidences and indications for subsequent revision (re-revision) following rTHA based on age.

METHODS

Patients undergoing aseptic rTHA from 2011 to 2021 with minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on age at the time of index rTHA (ie, <55 years, 55 to 74 years, and >74 years). Perioperative characteristics, complications, and re-revisions were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of 694 included rTHAs, those in the >74 age group were more likely to undergo rTHA for periprosthetic fracture (P < .001) while those in the <55 age group were more likely to undergo rTHA for metallosis/taper corrosion (P = .028). Readmissions (P = .759) and emergency department visits (P = .498) within 90 days were comparable across ages. Rates of re-revision were comparable at 90 days (P = .495), 1 year (P = .443), and 2 years (P = .204). Kaplan-Meier analysis of all-cause re-revision at latest follow-up showed a nonstatistically significant trend toward increasing re-revisions in the <55 and 55 to 74 age groups. Using logistic regressions, smoking and index rTHA for instability were independently associated with re-revision, while age at index surgery was not.

CONCLUSIONS

While indications for rTHA differ across age groups, rates of 2-year re-revision are statistically comparable between groups. Further studies are warranted to understand the association between age, activity, and re-revision rates after 5 years postoperatively.

Elevated risk of prosthetic infections in cannabis users after shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of states are beginning to legalize recreational cannabis use, and as such, more patients using cannabis are undergoing shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The present study sought to examine the impact of cannabis use on post-operative outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were postoperative complications, which included infection, periprosthetic fractures, periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), dislocations, and aseptic loosening as well as medical complications. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for PJI and aseptic loosening at two-years.

METHODS

A private, nationwide, all-payer database (Pearldiver Technologies) was queried to identify shoulder arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2020. Those not using tobacco or cannabis ("control", n = 10,000), tobacco users (n = 10,000), cannabis users (n = 155), and concurrent tobacco and cannabis users (n = 9,842) were identified. Risk factors for PJI and aseptic loosening at two-years were further quantified utilizing multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to non-users, cannabis users experienced the highest odds for PJI and aseptic revisions, which were followed by concurrent cannabis and tobacco users and tobacco-only users. Concurrent users, as well as tobacco users were at higher risk for dislocation. Cannabis use was the most significant risk factor for PJI, followed by concurrent use and male sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found cannabis use to cause greater risk for superficial and deep infection. More research involving randomized trials are needed to fully elucidate the impact of cannabis use on shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Clinically, these findings can appropriately guide surgeons and patients alike regarding expectations prior to undergoing TSA.

Femoral Head Core Decompressions: Characterization of Subsequent Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty and Related Complications

BACKGROUND

Core decompression is a minimally invasive joint-preserving approach for early-stage osteonecrosis. The rate at which core decompression patients require total hip arthroplasty (THA) and rates of perioperative adverse outcomes have not been well-characterized.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing core decompression and/or THA with osteonecrosis of the femoral head were identified from the 2015 to 2021 Q3 PearlDiver M157 database. Those undergoing THA without or with antecedent core decompression were identified and matched 4:1 on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Postoperative 90-day adverse events were compared with multivariable analysis. Five-year rates of revision, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture were compared by the Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Core decompressions were identified for 3,025 patients of whom 387 (12.8%) went on to THA within 5 years (64% within the first year). The median time from initial core decompression to THA was 252 days. For THA, 26,209 adults were identified and 387 had prior core decompression. After matching, there were 1,320 without core decompression and 339 with core decompression. No statistically significant differences were observed in 90-day postoperative adverse events or 5-year rates of revision, dislocation, or periprosthetic fracture.

CONCLUSION

Core decompression may be an option for patients with osteonecrosis and does not seem to affect THA outcomes if required later.

The safety and efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in outpatient surgical centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment method for knee osteoarthritis. With the development and implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery, UKA is now increasingly performed in outpatient surgical centers. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the safety and effectiveness of performing UKA in outpatient settings.

METHODS

The search was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on outpatient UKA from PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, and WanFangData databases. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases until August 31, 2023. After independent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation by two researchers, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies involving 18,411 patients were included. The results showed that the postoperative transfusion rate in the outpatient group was lower than that in the inpatient group [OR = 0.36, 95%CI (0.24, 0.54), p < 0.00001], and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of readmission rate, reoperation rate, surgical site infection, and periprosthetic fracture. The differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the traditional inpatient route, the blood transfusion rate for single-condyle replacement in the outpatient operation center is lower, and there is no significant difference in readmission rate, reoperation rate, surgical site infection, and periprosthesis fracture. The outpatient approach to UKA is safe, feasible, and highly satisfactory for patients. However, the results have certain limitations, and a rigorous preoperative complication risk assessment can minimize the risk of UKA in outpatient surgery centers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO number CRD42023405373.

Liberal intraoperative fluid management leads to increased complication rates in geriatric patients with hip fracture

PURPOSE

Fractures of the proximal femur in geriatric patients are life-changing and life-threatening events. Previous research has identified fluid volume as an independent factor contributing to trauma patients' complications. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of intraoperative fluid volume on outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study with data from the hospital information systems. Our study included patients aged 70 years or older who had sustained a proximal femur fracture. We excluded patients with pathologic, periprosthetic, or peri-implant fractures and those with missing data. Based on the fluids given, we divided patients into high-volume and low-volume groups.

RESULTS

Patients with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and more comorbidities were more likely to receive more than 1500 ml of fluids. We observed significant differences in anesthesiologic management between the two groups, with a higher rate of invasive blood pressure management (IBP) and central venous catheter usage in the high-volume group. High-volume therapy was associated with a higher rate of complications (69.7% vs. 43.6%, p < 0.01), a higher transfusion rate (odds ratio 1.91 [1.26-2.91]), and an increased likelihood of patients being transferred to an intensive care unit (17.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.009). These findings were confirmed after adjusting for ASA grade, age, sex, type of fracture, Identification-of-Seniors-At-Risk (ISAR) score, and intraoperative blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that intraoperative fluid volume is a significant factor that impacts the outcome of hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients. High-volume therapy was associated with increased complications.

Predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures of the hip: Results from the national PPF study

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip joint are increasing in prevalence. In this collaborative study, we aimed to investigate the impact of patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and modes of management on in-hospital mortality of PPFs involving the hip.

METHODS

Using a multi-centre cohort study design, we retrospectively identified adults presenting with a PPF around the hip over a 10-year period. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the independent correlation between patient, fracture, and treatment factors on mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,109 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%. Multivariable analyses suggested that age, male sex, abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), pneumonia, renal failure, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and deep surgical site infection were each independently associated with mortality. Each yearly increase in age independently correlates with a 7% increase in mortality (OR 1.07, p=0.019). The odds of mortality was 2.99 times higher for patients diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital stay [OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.07-8.37) p=0.037], and 7.25 times higher for patients that developed renal failure during their stay [OR 7.25 (95% CI 1.85-28.47) p=0.005]. Patients with history of PVD have a six-fold greater mortality risk (OR 6.06, p=0.003). Mode of treatment was not a significant predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSION

The in-hospital mortality rate of PPFs around the hip exceeds 5%. The fracture subtype and mode of management are not independent predictors of mortality, while patient factors such as age, AMTS, history of PVD, pneumonia, and renal failure can independently predict mortality. Peri-operative optimisation of modifiable risk factors such as lung and kidney function in patients with PPFs around the hip during their hospital stay is of utmost importance.

Comparing direct anterior approach versus posterior approach or lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are several approaches to THA, and each has their respective advantages and disadvantages. Previous meta-analysis included non-randomised studies that introduce further heterogeneity and bias to the evidence presented. This meta-analysis aims to present level I evidence by comparing functional outcomes, peri-operative parameters and complications of direct anterior approach (DAA) versus posterior approach (PA) or lateral approach (LA) in THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive multi-database search (PubMed, OVID Medline, EMBASE) was conducted from date of database inception to 1st December 2020. Data from randomised controlled trials comparing outcomes of DAA versus PA or LA in THA were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies comprising 2010 patients were included in this meta-analysis. DAA has a longer operative time (MD = 17.38 min, 95%CI: 12.28, 22.47 min, P < 0.001) but a shorter length of stay compared to PA (MD = - 0.33 days, 95%CI: - 0.55, - 0.11 days, P = 0.003). There was no difference in operative time or length of stay when comparing DAA versus LA. DAA also had significantly better HHS than PA at 6 weeks (MD = 8.00, 95%CI: 5.85, 10.15, P < 0.001) and LA at 12 weeks (MD = 2.23, 95%CI: 0.31, 4.15, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in risk of neurapraxia for DAA versus LA or in risk of dislocations, periprosthetic fractures or VTE between DAA and PA or DAA and LA.

CONCLUSION

The DAA has better early functional outcomes with shorter mean length of stay but was associated with a longer operative time than PA. There was no difference in risk of dislocations, neurapraxias, periprosthetic fractures or VTE between approaches. Based on our results, choice of THA approach should ultimately be guided by surgeon experience, surgeon preference and patient factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both modular and monoblock tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are increasingly being used for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). However, the differences between the two designs in clinical outcomes and complications are not yet clear. Here, we intend to compare the efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock TFT stems in rTHA.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to include studies comparing modular and monoblock implants in rTHA. Data on the survivorship of stems, postoperative hip function, and complications were extracted following inclusion criteria. Inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel methods in Review Manager (version 5.3 from Cochrane Collaboration) were used to evaluate differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 2188 hips (1430 modular and 758 monoblock stems) were finally included. The main reason for the revision was aseptic loosening. Paprosky type III was the most common type in both groups. Both stems showed similar re-revision rates (modular vs monoblock: 10.3% vs 9.5%, P = 0.80) and Harris Hip Scores (WMD = 0.43, P = 0.46) for hip function. The intraoperative fracture rate was 11.6% and 5.0% (P = 0.0004) for modular and monoblock stems, respectively. The rate of subsidence > 10 mm was significantly higher in the monoblock group (4.5% vs 1.0%, P = 0.003). The application of extended trochanteric osteotomy was more popular in monoblock stems (22.7% vs 17.5%, P = 0.003). The incidence of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic femoral fracture and dislocation was similar between both stems.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found between modular and monoblock tapered stems as regards postoperative hip function, re-revision rates, and complications. Severe subsidence was more frequent in monoblock stems while modular ones were at higher risk of intraoperative fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of randomized control and non-randomized studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

We registered our study in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020213642).

Did a New Design of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis Result in Improved Survival? A Study From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has generally shown higher revision rates than TKA, and this is particularly true for the femoral component. A twin-peg femoral component (Oxford Partial) has replaced the single-peg version (Oxford Phase III) of the widely used Oxford medial UKA, with the aim of improving femoral component fixation. The introduction of the Oxford Partial Knee also included a fully uncemented option. However, there has been relatively little evidence regarding the effect of these changes on implant survival and revision diagnoses from groups not associated with the implant design.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, we asked: (1) Has the 5-year implant survival (free from revision for any cause) improved with the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee after the introduction of new designs? (2) Did the causes of revision change between the old and new designs? (3) Is there a difference in risk for specific revision causes between the uncemented and cemented versions of the new design?

METHODS

We performed a registry-based observational study using data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, a nationwide, mandatory and governmental registry with a high reporting rate. Between 2012 and 2021, 7549 Oxford UKAs were performed, and 105 were excluded due to combinations of the three designs, lateral compartment replacement, or hybrid fixation, leaving 908 cemented Oxford Phase III single-peg (used from 2012 to 2017), 4715 cemented Oxford Partial twin-peg (used from 2012 to 2021), and 1821 uncemented Oxford Partial twin-peg (used from 2014 to 2021), UKAs available for the analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression multivariate analysis were used to find the 5-year implant survival and the risk of revision (hazard ratio), when adjusting for age, gender, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and time period. The risk of revision for any cause and the risk of revision for specific causes were compared, first for the older with the two new designs, and second for the cemented with the uncemented version of the new design. Revision was defined as any operation exchanging or removing implant parts.

RESULTS

The 5-year Kaplan-Meier overall implant survival (free from revision for any cause) for the medial Oxford Partial unicompartmental knee did not improve over the study period. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival was different (p = 0.03) between the groups: it was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90% to 94%) for the cemented Oxford III, 94% (95% CI 93% to 95%) for the cemented Oxford Partial, and 94% (95% CI 92% to 95%) for the uncemented Oxford Partial. However, the overall risk of revision during the first 5 years was not different between the groups (Cox regression HR 0.8 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.0]; p = 0.09 and 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.4]; p = 0.89 for the cemented Oxford Partial and the uncemented Oxford Partial, respectively, compared with cemented Oxford III [HR 1]). The uncemented Oxford Partial had a higher risk of revision for infection (HR 3.6 [95% CI 1.2 to 10.5]; p = 0.02) compared with the cemented Oxford III. The uncemented Oxford Partial had a lower risk of revision for pain (HR 0.5 [95% CI 0.2 to 1.0]; p = 0.045) and instability (HR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.03) compared with the cemented Oxford III. The cemented Oxford Partial had a lower risk of revision for aseptic femoral loosening (HR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 1.0]; p = 0.04) compared with the cemented Oxford III. When comparing the uncemented and cemented versions of the new design, the uncemented Oxford Partial had a higher risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture (HR 15 [95% CI 4 to 54]; p = 0.001) and infection within the first year (HR 3.0 [95% CI 1.5 to 5.7]; p = 0.001) than the cemented Oxford Partial.

CONCLUSION

Considering that we found no difference in overall risk of revision during the first 5 years but we found a higher risk of revision for infection, periprosthetic fracture, and higher per implant cost, we currently would recommend against the use of uncemented Oxford Partial over the cemented Oxford Partial or the cemented Oxford III.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Have Surgery and Implant Modifications Been Associated With Reduction in Soft Tissue Complications in Transfemoral Bone-anchored Prostheses?

BACKGROUND

The most frequently occurring adverse events in individuals with a transfemoral amputation treated with a bone-anchored prosthesis are soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications. These soft tissue complications are believed to be influenced by surgical technique and implant design, but little is known about the effect of changes to treatment on these events.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the result of surgical technique and implant modifications on the incidence of soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications in transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis users, depending on whether they had a conventional stoma and a cobalt-chrome-molybdenum (CoCrMo) osseointegration implant (treatment period 2009 to 2013) or a shallower stoma and titanium osseointegration implant (2015 to 2018)? (2) What is the incidence of serious complications, such as bone or implant infection, aseptic loosening, intramedullary stem breakage, and periprosthetic fracture?

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2013, we performed osseointegration implant surgery using a conventional surgical technique and a CoCrMo implant in 42 individuals who had a lower extremity amputation experiencing socket-related problems that resulted in limited prosthesis use. We considered all individuals treated with two-stage surgery with a standard press-fit transfemoral osseointegration implant as potentially eligible for inclusion. Based on this, 100% (42) were eligible, and 5% (two of 42) were excluded because they did not provide informed consent, leaving 95% (40 of 42) for analysis. Between 2015 and 2018, we treated 79 individuals with similar indications with osseointegration implant surgery, now also treating individuals with dysvascular amputations. We used an adapted surgical technique resulting in a shallower stoma combined with a titanium implant. Using the same eligibility criteria as for the first group, 51% (40 of 79) were eligible; 49% (39 of 79) were excluded because they were treated with transtibial amputation, a patient-specific implant, or single-stage surgery and 1% (one of 79) were lost before the 2-year follow-up interval, leaving 49% (39 of 79) for analysis. The period of 2013 to 2015 was a transitional period and was excluded from analysis in this study to keep groups reasonably comparable and to compare a historical approach with the present approach. Hence, we presented a comparative study of two study groups (defined by surgical technique and implant design) with standardized 2-year follow-up. The risk factors for adverse events were similar between groups, although individuals treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant potentially possessed an increased risk because of the inclusion of individuals with dysvascular amputation and the discontinuation of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Outcomes studied were soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications (hypergranulation or keloid formation as well as stoma redundant tissue) and bone or implant infection, aseptic loosening, implant stem breakage, periprosthetic fracture, and death.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant experienced fewer soft tissue infections (13 versus 76 events, absolute risk 0.17 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.30] versus 0.93 [95% CI 0.60 to 1.45]; p < 0.01), which were treated with less invasive measures, and fewer stoma redundant tissue events (0 versus five events, absolute risk 0 versus 0.06 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.14]) than patients treated with the conventional stoma surgical technique and CoCrMo implant. This was contrasted by an increased incidence of surgical site infections occurring between surgical stages 1 and 2, when no stoma was yet created, after the implementation of treatment changes (conventional surgery and CoCrMo implant versus shallow stoma surgery and titanium implant: one versus 11 events, absolute risk 0.01 [95% CI 0.00 to 0.08] versus 0.14 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.25]; p = 0.02). Patients treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant did not experience serious complications, although bone infections occurred (six events in 8% [three of 40] of patients) in the conventional surgery and CoCrMo implant group, all of which were successfully treated with implant retention.

CONCLUSION

Adaptations to surgical technique and newer implant designs, as well as learning curve and experience, have resulted in a reduced incidence and severity of soft tissue infections and stoma redundant tissue, contrasted by an increase in surgical site infections before stoma creation. Serious complications such as deep implant infection were infrequent in this 2-year follow-up period. We believe the benefits of these treatment modifications outweigh the disadvantages and currently advise surgeons to create a shallower stoma with a stable soft tissue envelope, combined with a titanium implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Diagnostic accuracy of algorithms to define incident and second hip fractures: A Taiwan validation study

BACKGROUND

Previous epidemiological researchers have used various algorithms to identify a second hip fracture; however, there has been no validation of these algorithms to date. This study aimed to verify existing algorithms for identifying second hip fracture under the International Classification of Diseases diagnostic coding systems. Furthermore, we examined the validity of two newly proposed algorithms that integrated the concept of periprosthetic fractures and laterality of the ICD-10 coding system.

METHODS

Claims data of patients hospitalized for hip fracture from National Taiwan University Hospitals between 2007 and 2020 were retrieved. Hip fracture was confirmed by 2 orthopaedic surgeons with medical records and imaging data as gold standards. The validity of 9 existing and 2 newly proposed algorithms for identifying second hip fracture was evaluated.

RESULTS

The positive predictive value (PPV) range between 84% and 90% in existing algorithms for identifying second hip fractures. Noteworthy, the longer time interval for discrimination resulted in slightly increased PPV (from 87% to 90%), while decreased sensitivity noticeably (from 87% to 72%). When considering the information about periprosthetic fracture, the PPV increased to 91% without diminished sensitivity. The PPV of the newly proposed ICD-10-specific algorithm was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Algorithms integrated clinical insights of periprosthetic fractures and laterality concept of ICD-10 coding system provided satisfactory validity and help precisely define second hip fracture in future database research.

What Are the Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Compressive Endoprosthetic Osseointegration of the Femur with a Minimum 10-year Follow-up Period?

BACKGROUND

Endoprosthetic reconstruction after oncologic resection of bone tumors requires stable fixation between the prosthesis and residual host bone. Compressive osseointegration has been developed as an alternative to traditional stemmed implants to address the challenges and complications of achieving this fixation. Sufficient time has now passed from the advent of compressive implants to allow for an assessment of the intermediate-term and long-term results of this form of fixation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

At a minimum follow-up of 10 years after implantation of a compressive osseointegration device for oncologic reconstruction: (1) What is the risk of periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, or implant breakage resulting in revision surgery for endoprosthesis removal? (2) What is the long-term cortical response at the host-endoprosthesis interface as visualized on plain radiographs?

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was performed between 2002 and 2010, in which 110 patients with primary bone sarcoma of the proximal or distal femur were considered for oncologic resection and reconstruction. Patients were considered for a compressive osseointegration endoprosthesis if they were 50 years of age or younger, had not previously received femoral radiation, had no metabolic disease impairing bone healing, were not diagnosed with metastatic disease, and had life expectancy greater than six months. Of the 110 patients, 25 were treated with a compressive osseointegration implant of the proximal or distal femur, and 85 patients were treated with conventional stemmed implants or amputation because of older age, advanced disease, metabolic comorbidities, inability to tolerate a nonweightbearing postoperative period, or in the case of rotationplasty, patient preference. All patients who received this device during the period of study were considered eligible for inclusion in this review. The median (range) age was 18 years (7 to 50), and 13 of 25 patients were men. Five patients died of disease before the minimum follow-up duration of 10 years; two underwent amputation due to local recurrence and three died with the implant in situ, leaving 20 patients for complete analysis. Median follow-up was 144 months, and all 20 surviving patients had a minimum follow-up of 10 years (121 to 230 months). The primary endpoint was reoperation and implant removal for periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, or mechanical breakage of any component of the compressive device in the endoprosthesis. In final analysis, death was considered a competing event to revision surgery, and cumulative incidence was reported after competing-event analysis. A secondary aim was radiographic evaluation of the host-implant interface to assess the long-term cortical response to compressive osseointegration.

RESULTS

Spindle fracture or loosening was noted in three patients, and the remaining 17 patients maintained the compression device until the final follow-up. The risk of reoperation for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, or mechanical breakage of the implant using a competing risks estimator was 12% at 10 years (95% CI 0% to 26%). These complications occurred within 29 months of the index surgery; no patients had implant loosening or mechanical breakdown after this initial period. On radiographic assessment, 14 patients demonstrated cortical hypertrophy of the bone-implant interface, six patients had maintenance of the native cortical contour, and no patients had cortical atrophy or narrowing at the implant interface.Conclusion Long-term follow-up in patients with compressive osseointegrative endoprosthetic devices demonstrated no late revisions because of periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, or implant breakage in this cohort with a minimum 10-year follow-up. There was no evidence of late-onset cortical atrophy or stress shielding at the host-implant interface. This study supports the long-term stability of the interface between host bone and the endoprosthesis in compressive osseointegration devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Peri-Implant Olecranon Tip Fracture: Complication of Olecranon Osteotomy Plating

Several anatomic plates for fixation of the olecranon after a fracture or an osteotomy are commercially available. They serve as an alternative for tension band wiring, which is associated with a relatively high complication rate. Plating of the olecranon reportedly might result in nonunion or malunion and eventually may require revision surgery or plate removal because of skin irritation. The authors describe a proximal periprosthetic avulsion fracture of the tip of the olecranon as a unique complication associated with the use of an anatomic plate for fixation of an olecranon osteotomy. This retrospective case series included 35 patients with comminuted distal humerus fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation through an olecranon osteotomy with an anatomic olecranon plate. Of the 35 patients, 6 (17.1%) had postoperative olecranon tip fracture, just proximal to the osteotomy site. In all cases, the fracture line coursed through the proximal cluster of screws situated on the proximal part of the plate. Avulsion fractures of the tip of the olecranon after plating of the olecranon osteotomy could have occurred as a result of biomechanical factors. The short design of the proximal part of the plate and the high screw density in the proximal part of the olecranon could lead to increased mechanical stress during contraction of the triceps. This complication should prompt further biomechanical evaluation of the plate design. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e583-e587.].

Trends in hip fracture care in the Republic of Ireland from 2013 to 2018: results from the Irish Hip Fracture Database

Hip fractures continue to be one of the most serious and costly injuries suffered by older people globally. This paper describes the development of a national hip fracture audit and summarises the first 6 years of data from the Republic of Ireland. This can help inform care, standards and outcomes of hip fracture patients.

INTRODUCTION

Ireland has one of the highest standardised rates of hip fracture in the world behind northern European countries. The Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) was established in 2012 to drive clinical and organisational improvements in quality and effectiveness of hip fracture care. This paper describes the progression of the IHFD between 2013 and 2018 and identifies trends and areas for improvement.

METHODS

The IHFD is a clinically led, web-based audit, with data collected through the national Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) electronic system, the principal source of information from publicly funded acute hospitals in Ireland. Eligible cases are aged ≥ 60 years with hip fracture as defined by IHFD or with other specified hip fracture excluding periprosthetic fractures. As of 2015, all 16 trauma-receiving hospitals within Ireland submitted data. Demographics and adherence to six national quality standards are described.

RESULTS

A total of 17,983 cases were included in the analysis. National coverage has increased from 63% in 2013 to 99% in 2018. Demographic characteristics are unchanged, but higher levels of comorbidity are seen. Internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty are the most common modes of surgical repair with two-thirds of cases receiving spinal rather than general anaesthesia. Increasingly patients are being assessed by a geriatrician (11% in 2013 to 69% in 2018) and receive a bone health assessment (65% in 2013 to 84% in 2018).

CONCLUSION

While some hip fracture standards have improved, further improvements are required to compare favourably internationally. Reduction of surgical delay and ensuring early mobilisation post-operatively are immediate priorities for the IHFD.

The relationship of bilateral shoulder arthroplasty timing and postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

Though several case series have described bilateral shoulder arthroplasty results with range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, and complications, little guidance exists regarding the optimal interval timing between surgeries.

METHODS

All patients from 2 insurance databases who underwent staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasty between 2005 and 2016 were identified. These patients were then stratified by elapsed time between surgeries into 4 study groups: (1) less than 3 months, (2) 3-6 months, (3) 6-9 months, and (4) 9-12 months. Surgical and perioperative medical complications of these patient cohorts were compared to a control group that underwent bilateral shoulder arthroplasty with a greater than 1-year interval between surgeries.

RESULTS

From 2005-2016, a total of 1764 patients (6.3%) underwent bilateral shoulder arthroplasty out of 27,962 shoulder arthroplasties performed in the 2 databases. Of the bilateral patients, 49.1% waited more than 1 year before their second shoulder arthroplasty. Patients waiting less than 3 months between surgeries comprised 4.9% of the total number of staged bilateral surgeries. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the study groups. Overall, implant complications were higher in patients with surgeries less than 3 months apart compared to controls, including revision arthroplasty (11.6% vs. 5.4%, odds ratio [OR] 2.29, P = .037), loosening/lysis (8.1% vs. 3.5%, OR 2.46, P = .032), and periprosthetic fracture (4.7% vs. 1.2%, OR 4.18, P = .010). There were no significant increases in any implant-related complications when surgeries were staged by 3 months or more compared to controls. Venous thromboembolism (VTE; 8.1% vs. 2.2%, OR 3.95, P = .001) and blood transfusion (9.3% vs. 1.7%, OR 5.82, P < .001) occurred at a significantly higher rate in patients with less than 3 months between surgeries compared with controls. There were no differences in any medical complications when surgeries were staged by 3 months or more compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasty who have the second arthroplasty within 3 months have significantly higher rates of revision surgery, loosening/lysis, periprosthetic fracture, VTE, and blood transfusions. Based on these lower complication rates, surgeons should consider waiting a minimum of 3 months before performing the second portion of a staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasty.

In Situ Straightening of a Bent Tibiofemoral Intramedullary Nail: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Intramedullary nailing is considered the gold standard for the surgical management of diaphyseal long bone fractures of the lower extremity. A rare complication following intramedullary nailing of a femur or tibia fracture is periprosthetic fracture following secondary trauma with deformation of the nail itself. We present a case of a 51-year-old male with a long history of prior left knee arthrodesis with a tibiofemoral nail who sustained a work injury resulting in a proximal tibia fracture and bent tibiofemoral nail. Clinically, he presented with significant varus and procurvatum limb deformity and a six-centimeter limb length discrepancy. The patient was successfully managed with in situ straightening of the tibiofemoral nail under a general anesthetic with return to work three months following manipulation. Level of Evidence: IV.

Vancomycin prophylaxis for revision hip arthroplasty in penicillin and cephalosporin sensitive patients: Is dose adjustment necessary in accordance with blood loss and fluid replacement?

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the changes in the serum concentration of prophylactically administrated vancomycin in the perioperative period of revision hip arthroplasty in penicillin/cephalosporin-allergic patients, (2) to assess whether the postoperative re-administration of vancomycin is needed, and (3) to determine the relationships of vancomycin serum concentration with blood loss, body weight, and fluid replacement in such patients.

METHODS

This study consisted of 29 patients (20 females, 9 males; mean age=63.3 years; age range=45-79 years) with a history of penicillin/cephalosporin allergy undergoing revision hip arthroplasty secondary to aseptic loosening or periprosthetic fractures. Serum vancomycin levels were measured (1) before administration of vancomycin, (2) at the time of skin incision, (3) every 1,5 hours thereafter until the end of the operation, (4) during the skin closure, and (5) after three and 12 hours from the initial dosage. Data regarding body weight, amounts of intraoperative blood loss, fluid and blood replacements and postoperative wound drainage were recorded.

RESULTS

The average blood loss, fluid replacement, and drain volume were 1280.3±575.8 (500-2700) mL, 2922.6±768.8 (1700-4600) mL, and 480.2±163.7 (200-850) mL, respectively. The mean levels of serum vancomycin were 46.3±21.8 (14.1-80.7) mg/L at the time of skin incision, 17.9±4.7 (9.4-30.9) and 9.8±2.2 (4.3-13.8) mg/L after 1.5 and 3 hours from the beginning of the surgery and 5.1±1.1 (2.9-6.8)mg/L after 12th hour postoperatively. The measured vancomycin levels were below the effective serum concentrations (< 5 mg/L) for 18 patients at 12 hours the administration of the first dose. A moderate level negative correlation between the blood loss/body weight ratio and vancomycin levels was found (p=0.004, r=-0.493). Predictive ROC curve analysis resulted in determining a blood loss volume higher than 1150 ml and a blood loss/body weight ratio higher than 18,5 is significant to estimate the vancomycin level below the minimum effective serum level at 12th hour postoperatively (AUC=0.793±0.16, p=0.009, AUC=0.753) 26±0.12, p=0.025, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from this study has indicated vancomycin concentration at 12th hour is below the effective level in most patients. Thus, earlier repetitive infusion of vancomycin seems to be necessary in penicillin/cephalosporin-allergic patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, especially in those with high blood loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Periprosthetic Fractures and Conversion Hip Replacement Using the Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip

Periprosthetic fractures of the femur and the acetabulum around a hip replacement are unfortunately relatively common as is failed acetabular and hip fracture fixation. This chapter will detail the use of the direct anterior approach to the hip to manage periprosthetic fractures of the femur and the acetabulum. We will also address the use of the direct anterior approach to the hip for conversion hip replacement in cases of failed femoral and acetabular fracture fixation.

Tips and Tricks for Common, Yet Difficult Osteopenic Fractures in the Community

Owing to advances in medicine, the number of elderly patients is growing, concurrently leading to an increasing incidence in osteopenic fractures that often require surgical management. Some of the most common anatomic areas include the proximal humerus, the distal humerus, femoral neck fractures, and periprosthetic fractures around a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Here, surgical strategies for these challenging clinical scenarios are reviewed, offering poignant tips and tricks to avoid pitfalls and complications.

[Randomized controlled trial of comparison between the SuperPATH and posterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of SuperPATH approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with conventional posterolateral approach.

Methods

Between March 2017 and May 2017, 24 patients who planned to have a unilateral THA were enrolled in the study and randomized into 2 groups. Twelve patients were treated with SuperPATH approach (SuperPATH group) and 12 patients with posterolateral approach (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, the type of disease, complicating diseases, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, length of stay, length of incision, and perioperative complications related to operation were recorded. The hemoglobin and hematocrit were recorded; the total blood loss and intraoperative blood loss were calculated. The inflammatory response indicators (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and muscle damage index (creatine kinase) were recorded in both groups. The range of motion, functional score (Harris score), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and prosthesis position were recorded.

Results

Patients in both groups were followed up 1 year. Compared with the control group, the operation time of the SuperPATH group was longer ( t=4.470, P=0.000), and the incision was shorter ( t=-2.168, P=0.041). There was no significant difference in length of stay between 2 groups ( t=0.474, P=0.640). Periprosthetic fracture occurred in 1 case of the SuperPATH group. No other complications, such as infection or deep vein thrombosis, occurred in both groups. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, hemoglobin and hematocrit before operation and at 1 and 3 days after operation, and C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate before operation and at 1, 3, and 14 days between 2 groups ( P>0.05). For creatine kinase, SuperPATH group at 1 and 3 days were lower than control group ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between 2 groups before operation and at 14 days after operation ( P>0.05). For flexion and abduction activity, SuperPATH group at 1 and 3 days after operation were better than the control group ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 14 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation ( P>0.05). The Harris and VAS scores of SuperPATH group at 1 and 3 days after operation were better than those of control group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in anteversion and abduction between 2 groups ( P>0.05) according to the X-ray film at 1 year. During the follow-up, no loosening or migration was observed.

Conclusion

Compared with the posterolateral approach, the SuperPATH approach can reduce muscle damage, relieve early pain, promote recovery, and obtain the similar short-term effectiveness.

[Three successive fractures of different hip femoral stems on the same patient]

The clinical case of an 80-year-old female who suffered three fractures in uncemented stems implanted in her right hip in a period of three years is presented. A fracture occurred in the prosthetic neck and the other two at the juncture of the conical and cylindrical stem portion, coinciding with the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the femur. The main causes of the failure were an increasing concentration of forces at the level of the implant as a consequence of the increased length of the neck and lateralization of the femur (offset). Other causes that have contributed to this prosthetic failure are analyzed.

[Causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Retrospective reviews were conducted for the causes of failures of 181 TKA patients between January 2007 and December 2013.

RESULTS

Among the causes of failures after primary TKA, infection was the major cause of failure (53%, 96/181) followed by aseptic loosening (16%, 29/181), arthrofibrosis (10%, 18/181), instability (6.6%, 12/181), extensor mechanism problem (5%, 9/181), wear (4.4%, 8/181), periprosthetic fracture (2.8%, 5/181) and others (2.2%, 4/181). And 64.1% occurred in the first two years, 19.9% occurred between 2 and 5 years and 16.0% occurred after 5 years after operation. Up to 84.0% occurred in 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The top three causes of failures after primary TKA at our center are infection, aseptic loosening and arthrofibrosis.

[Modes of medium failures after total hip arthroplasty in China: a single-center retrospective study]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the modes of medium failures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in China and compare our results with foreign countries.

METHODS

Retrospective reviews were conducted for the causes of medium failures of 137 revision THAs between January 2007 and December 2013. The causes of failure included infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, implant-related failure, heterotopic ossification and liner wear.

RESULTS

The causes in a decreasing order were aseptic loosening (55.5%, 76/137), infection (31.4%, 43/137), liner wear (6.6%, 9/137), periprosthetic fracture (5.1%, 7/137) and dislocation (1.5%, 2/137).

CONCLUSION

The top three domestic causes of medium failure after primary THA are aseptic loosening, infection and liner wear.

[Causes of early failure after total hip arthroplasty]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the causes of early failure after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The causes of early THA failures were retrospectively reviewed for 215 cases of revision THA between January 2007 and December 2013.

RESULTS

The causes of early failures of primary THA in decreasing frequencies were infection (50.7%, 109/215), aseptic loosening (31.6%, 68/215), dislocation (8.8%, 19/215), periprosthetic fracture (3.7%, 8/215), implant-related failure (2.3%, 5/215), heterotopic ossification (1.4%, 3/215) and liner wear (0.9%, 2/215).

CONCLUSION

The top three causes of early failure after primary THA are infection, aseptic loosening and dislocation.

[Analysis of clinical features of 3 201 cases of adult intertrochanteric fractures: a single center experience]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the gender, age, fracture classification and variation trend of adult intertrochanteric fractures treated in a single-center hospital in ten years.

METHODS

The data of adult (age ≥ 16 years) intertrochanteric fractures admitted to the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2003 to December 2012 were collected retrospectively. All the fractures were acute and the pathological or periprosthetic fractures were excluded. The radiography of fracture were classified by same experienced orthopedic resident and verified by two orthopedic deans and one radiologist. The gender, age and fracture classification were analyzed and compared between January 2003 to December 2007 and January 2008 to December 2012.

RESULTS

A total of 3 201 cases were collected. The adult intertrochanteric fractures accounted for 2.97% of all adult fractures and 43.76% of adult proximal femoral fractures. Of all fractures 64.98% were elderly ( ≥ 60 years) and 35.02% were middle-aged (16-59 years). In elderly, female were common (57.78%) while in middle-aged were male commonly (79.13%). According to Evans classification, instable fractures were more common (68.92%). According to AO classification, the most common type was A2 (49.67%) and the least was A3 (15.93%). Comparing between January 2003 to December 2012 and January 2008 to December 2012, the proportion of intertrochanteric fracture of adult fracture was decreased by 0.31% (χ² = 9.29, P = 0.002)and the proportion of intertrochanteric fracture of adult proximal femoral fractures was decreased by 3.15% (χ² = 7.35, P = 0.007). The proportion of elderly patients, female and stable fractures was increased by 14.35% (χ² = 71.98, P < 0.01), 4.04% (χ² = 8.16, P = 0.004) and 5.62% (χ² = 11.7, P = 0.001), respectively. The proportion of AO classification was not significantly verified (χ² = 3.24, P = 0.198).

CONCLUSIONS

The intertrochanteric fractures are most common in elderly patients, A2-type of AO Classification and stable (Evans III, IV, V) in Evans classification. Compared with the previous five years, the proportions of female, elderly and stable (Evans I, II) fracture increase in last 5 years.

[Short- and medium-term effectivenesses of stemless hip arthroplasty for treating hip joint disease in young and middle-aged patients]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the short- and medium-term effectivenesses of stemless hip arthroplasty for treating hip joint disease in young and middle-aged patients.

METHODS

Between June 2005 and December 2010, 25 cases (27 hips) of hip joint disease were treated with stemless hip arthroplasty. There were 17 males (19 hips) and 8 females (8 hips) with an average age of 45.6 years (range, 30-57 years), including 13 left hips, 10 right hips, and 2 bilateral hips. The causes included avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) secondary to femoral neck fracture in 5 cases (5 hips), ANFH in 15 cases (16 hips), osteoarthritis of the hip joint caused by ankylosing spondylitis in 2 cases (3 hips), osteoarthritis of the hip joint caused by dysplasia of acetabular in 2 cases (2 hips), and rheumatoid arthritis in 1 case (1 hip). The disease duration was 1-17 years (mean, 6.1 years). Before operation, the Harris score was 47.6 ± 14.2.

RESULTS

The incision healed by first intention in all patients, and no complications occurred, such as infection, periprosthetic fracture, and deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity. Twenty-five patients (27 hips) were followed up 36-96 months (mean, 51 months). One case (1 hip) had sciatic nerve injury after operation, which was relieved by symptomatic treatment. One case (1 hip) had prosthesis loosening, which was relieved after revision. The survival rate of prosthesis was 96.3% (26/27). At last follow-up, the Harris score was 92.1 ± 3.6, which was significantly better than preoperative score (t = 18.241, P = 0.000). The excellent and good rate was 88.9% (excellent in 19 hips, good in 5 hips, fair in 2 hips, and poor in 1 hip). The X-ray films showed good location of prosthesis, and no evidence of dislocation, bone resorption, osteolysis, and heterotopic ossification.

CONCLUSION

Because of reserving femoral neck, biomechanics conduction and distribute of the proximal femur achieve natural biomechanics state of the human body. The short- and medium-term effectivenesses of stemless hip arthroplasty for treating hip joint disease in young and middle-aged patients are satisfactory, but the long-term effectiveness need further observation.

[Imaging reasons for periprosthetic femoral fractures during the operation of total hip arthroplasty with anatomic prosthesis]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the imaging reasons for periprosthetic femoral fractures during the operation of total hip arthroplasty with anatomic prosthesis.

METHODS

The fracture group consisted of 7 cases with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) and the non-fracture group 21 cases without PPFF during the operation of total hip arthroplasty (THA) among the 144 cases of primary THA with anatomic prosthesis. The preoperative plain films of hip joint were taken to calibrate the Sharp's angle, centre edge (CE) angle, femoral neck shaft angle, femoral anteversion angle of neck, bowing angle of proximal femoral shaft part, width of narrowest part in proximal femoral shaft. For each case, surgical details, age, height and weight were recorded. The results were analyzed with independent sample t test by software SPSS 17.0.

RESULTS

No significant difference existed in general situation, Sharp's angle and CE's angle between two groups. And there were significant differences in femoral neck shaft angle (P = 0.040), femoral anteversion angle of neck (P = 0.026), bowing angle of proximal femoral shaft part (P = 0.024), width of narrowest part in proximal femoral shaft (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Dysplasia of proximal femur is a major cause of periprosthetic femoral fracture during the operation of total hip arthroplasty with anatomic prosthesis.

[An investigation on failure mechanisms of primary 327 hip arthroplasties]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the detailed failure mechanisms of revision hip arthroplasties and related risk factors.

METHODS

From November 1988 to July 2008 revision of total hip arthroplasties was performed in 327 patients. The medical history, clinical and imaging material and operation records were investigated.

RESULTS

Regarding revision as the end point of the study, the reasons for 327 revision arthroplasties were aseptic loosening in 226 hips (69.1%), infection in 52 hips (15.9%), periprosthetic fracture in 22 hips (6.7%), instability in 17 hips (5.2%), stem fracture in 5 hips (1.5%) and liner dissociation in 5 hips (1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The main failure mechanisms of primary hip arthroplasties are aseptic loosening and infection of implants, which could be attributed to improper selection of operation indications and implants and limitations to surgical philosophy and technique.