1
|
Ouliaris C, Gill N, Castan M, Sundram S. OPCAT: How an international treaty regarding torture is relevant to the Australian mental health system. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024; 58:387-392. [PMID: 38217424 PMCID: PMC11055407 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231221419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
The United Nations Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture visits signatory nations to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). Its role is to monitor and support signatory nations in implementing and complying with the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). In October 2022, the United Nations Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture visited Australia but was barred from visiting mental health wards in Queensland and all detention facilities in New South Wales leading to the termination of its visit. This breach of Australia's obligations under the OPCAT presents a significant setback for the rights of people with mental illness and other involuntarily detained populations. This piece sets out to demonstrate the relevance of OPCAT to the mental health system in Australia. Individuals who are detained for compulsory treatment in locked facilities such as acute psychiatric inpatient wards and forensic mental health facilities are deprived of their liberty, often out of public view. Thus, it highlights the ethical and professional obligations of all mental health professionals, especially psychiatrists, to safeguard the human rights of individuals being detained in mental health facilities as enshrined in Australia's international legal obligations under the OPCAT. Adhering to these obligations diminishes the risk of future human rights violations of people with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calina Ouliaris
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Training Program, The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Neeraj Gill
- Mental Health Policy Unit, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- Mental Health and Specialist Services, Gold Coast Health, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Melissa Castan
- Faculty of Law, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Australian Academy of Law, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Suresh Sundram
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Mental Health Program, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Cabrini Outreach, Malvern, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crosby SS, Glantz LH. "Rectal Feeding"-Unethical Medical Officer Participation at CIA Secret Interrogation Facilities. JAMA 2024; 331:103-104. [PMID: 38127323 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.25866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses recently released information regarding the practice of “rectal feeding” among detainees at Guantanamo Bay and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) secret prisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sondra S Crosby
- Center for Health Law, Ethics, and Human Rights, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leonard H Glantz
- Center for Health Law, Ethics, and Human Rights, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berger Z, Rubenstein LS, DeCamp M. Clinical care and complicity with torture. BMJ 2018; 360:k449. [PMID: 29420187 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zackary Berger
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
| | - Leonard S Rubenstein
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
- Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
- Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Matthew DeCamp
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Despite it being abhorrent and illegal, torture is sometimes employed for information gathering. However, the extreme stressors employed during torture force the brain away from the relatively narrow, adaptive range of function it operates within. Torture degrades signal-to-noise ratios of information yield and increases false positive discovery rates. As a discovery methodology, torture fails basic tests of veridical, reliable and replicable information discovery. Torture fails during interrogation because it is an assault on our core integrated, social, psychological and neural functioning. There is a need for a profound cultural shift regarding torture, recognizing that torture impairs, rather than facilitates, investigations and truth-finding. Rising to this challenge will increase operational effectiveness, eliminate prisoner abuse and torment, and aid veridical and actionable information gathering. Policy regarding prisoner and detainee interrogation need to be refocused as a behavioural and brain sciences problem, and not simply treated as a legal, ethical or philosophical problem. Getting the science, ethics and practice in line is a challenge, but it can and should be done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S O'Mara
- From the Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College, Dublin D02 PN40, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shue H. Complicity and torture. J Med Ethics 2017; 43:264-265. [PMID: 26934911 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
One of the great merits of On Complicity and Compromise is that it wades into specific swamps where ordinary theorists fear to slog. It is persuasive that in general it can be right sometimes to be complicit in wrongdoing by others through causally contributing to the wrongdoing, but not sharing its purpose, if by being involved one can reasonably expect to lessen the extent of the wrong that would otherwise be suffered by the victims. I focus on whether the book's general thesis is applicable to torture, which depends on what torture and the torture situation are in fact like. I focus on the case to which the chapter several times refers: the innovative CIA paradigm of torture. First, to the extent that the paradigm, which is predominantly mental, or psychological, torture succeeds in its goal of producing regression to a compliant state, the physician would be unable to rely on the torture victim's expressions of preferences or interests as authentically his own. Second, since disorientation plays such a large role in the CIA's style of torture (adopted at Guantanamo by the military), the authorities would refuse to allow a stable relationship to be built up with any one doctor by any victim, making comprehension of the victim's preferences difficult. Third, even if the doctor could somehow judge what the victim's genuine interests were, the control of the situation is much too totalistic to allow the physician any action independent of what the torture regime requires.
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Kett M, Rushton S. Fostering narratives of peace and security? Med Confl Surviv 2017; 33:1-2. [PMID: 28609126 DOI: 10.1080/13623699.2017.1339260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kett
- a Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre, University College London , London , UK
| | - Simon Rushton
- b Department of Politics , University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cheung D. The compulsory psychiatric regime in Hong Kong: Constitutional and ethical perspectives. Int J Law Psychiatry 2017; 50:24-30. [PMID: 28040228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Revised: 09/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This article examines the compulsory psychiatric regime in Hong Kong. Under section 36 of the Mental Health Ordinance, which authorises long-term detention of psychiatric patients, a District Judge is required to countersign the form filled out by the registered medical practitioners in order for the detention to be valid. Case law, however, has shown that the role of the District Judge is merely administrative. This article suggests that, as it currently stands, the compulsory psychiatric regime in Hong Kong is unconstitutional because it fails the proportionality test. In light of this conclusion, the author proposes two solutions to deal with the issue, by common law or by legislative reform. The former would see an exercise of discretion by the courts read into section 36, while the latter would involve piecemeal reform of the relevant provisions to give the courts an explicit discretion to consider substantive issues when reviewing compulsory detention applications. The author argues that these solutions would introduce effective judicial supervision into the compulsory psychiatric regime and safeguard against abuse of process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy Cheung
- Department of Law, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Balfe M. Why Did U.S. Healthcare Professionals Become Involved in Torture During the War on Terror? J Bioeth Inq 2016; 13:449-460. [PMID: 27307063 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-016-9729-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This article examines why U.S. healthcare professionals became involved in "enhanced interrogation," or torture, during the War on Terror. A number of factors are identified including a desire on the part of these professionals to defend their country and fellow citizens from future attack; having their activities approved and authorized by legitimate command structures; financial incentives; and wanting to prevent serious harm from occurring to prisoners/detainees. The factors outlined here suggest that psychosocial factors can influence health professionals' ethical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myles Balfe
- Department of Sociology, University College Cork, Safari Building, O' Donovan's Road, Cork, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Isaacs D. Are healthcare professionals working in Australia's immigration detention centres condoning torture? J Med Ethics 2016; 42:413-415. [PMID: 26699920 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 10/28/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Australian immigration detention centres are in secluded locations, some on offshore islands, and are subject to extreme secrecy, comparable with 'black sites' elsewhere. There are parallels between healthcare professionals working in immigration detention centres and healthcare professionals involved with or complicit in torture. In both cases, healthcare professionals are conflicted between a duty of care to improve the health of patients and the interests of the government. While this duality of interests has been recognised previously, the full implications for healthcare professionals working in immigration detention have not been addressed. The Australian Government maintains that immigration detention is needed for security checks, but the average duration of immigration detention has increased from 10 weeks to 14 months, and detainees are not informed of the progress of their application for refugee status. Long-term immigration detention causes major mental health problems, is illegal in international law and arguably fulfils the recognised definition of torture. It is generally accepted that healthcare professionals should not participate in or condone torture. Australian healthcare professionals thus face a major ethical dilemma: patients in immigration detention have pressing mental and physical health needs, but providing healthcare might support or represent complicity in a practice that is unethical. Individual healthcare professionals need to decide whether or not to work in immigration detention centres. If they do so, they need to decide for how long and to what extent restrictive contracts and gagging laws will constrain them from advocating for closing detention centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Isaacs
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Microbiology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Discipline of Child Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanggaran JP, Zion D. Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe. J Med Ethics 2016; 42:420-423. [PMID: 27334705 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Australian immigration detention has been identified as perpetuating ongoing human rights violations. Concern has been heightened by the assessment of clinicians involved and by the United Nations that this treatment may in fact constitute torture. We discuss the allegations of torture within immigration detention, and the reasons why healthcare providers have an ethical duty to report them. Finally, we will discuss the protective power of ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment as a means of providing transparency and ethical guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deborah Zion
- Centre for Cultural Diversity and Well Being, Victoria University, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- David Berger
- Broome Hospital, Broome, 6725 Western Australia, Australia
| | - Steven H Miles
- University of Minnesota, N504 Boynton, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cabrera LY, Elger BS. Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System: Some Practical Ethical Considerations. J Bioeth Inq 2016; 13:95-103. [PMID: 26715046 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-015-9680-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, discussion around memory modification interventions has gained attention. However, discussion around the use of memory interventions in the criminal justice system has been mostly absent. In this paper we start by highlighting the importance memory has for human well-being and personal identity, as well as its role within the criminal forensic setting; in particular, for claiming and accepting legal responsibility, for moral learning, and for retribution. We provide examples of memory interventions that are currently available for medical purposes, but that in the future could be used in the forensic setting to modify criminal offenders' memories. In this section we contrast the cases of (1) dampening and (2) enhancing memories of criminal offenders. We then present from a pragmatic approach some pressing ethical issues associated with these types of memory interventions. The paper ends up highlighting how these pragmatic considerations can help establish ethically justified criteria regarding the possibility of interventions aimed at modifying criminal offenders' memories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Y Cabrera
- Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences and Department of Translational Science and Molecular Medicine, Michigan State University, East Fee Hall, 965 Fee Road, Rm C211, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Bernice S Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brooks TR. Breaking the oath: Why physicians torture. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc 2016; 79:43-48. [PMID: 27328538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
|
15
|
Patel NA, Elkin GD. Professionalism and conflicting interests: the American Psychological Association's involvement in torture. AMA J Ethics 2015; 17:924-930. [PMID: 26496055 DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.10.nlit1-1510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - G David Elkin
- Clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, where he co-leads the coordination of clinical psychiatry rotations and leads seminars on psychiatric assessment, critical thinking, and medical humanities. He completed his MD at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and a residency in internal medicine and psychiatry at the University of California, Davis, and the editor of Introduction to Clinical Psychiatry (Lange, 1999) and an upcoming book chapter on medical ethics
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- J Wesley Boyd
- Part-time assistant professor of psychiatry and a member of the Center for Bioethics faculty at Harvard Medical School in Boston, and a staff psychiatrist at Cambridge Health Alliance, where he is the co-founder and co-director of the Human Rights and Asylum Clinic, and writes for lay and academic audiences on issues of health care justice and humanist aspects of medicine
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aggarwal NK. Implications of the 2014 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report for Forensic Mental Health in the War on Terror. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2015; 43:350-358. [PMID: 26438813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
In December 2014, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released a declassified executive summary on the use by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of enhanced interrogation techniques against suspected terrorist detainees in the War on Terror. The report relies on 6 million pages of documents that describe the CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program, providing a systematic and comprehensive investigation into covert military and intelligence practices after the attacks on September 11, 2001. This article presents an analysis of key findings related to forensic mental health. I explore their implications for the ethics of mental health professionals who work with military and intelligence agencies and for facts disputed within the Guantánamo military commission system. Opportunities for further study and theoretical development are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Krishan Aggarwal
- Dr. Aggarwal is a Research Psychiatrist at the New York State Psychiatric Institute and Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at Columbia University, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McCarthy M. US psychologists banned from participating in national security interrogations. BMJ 2015; 351:h4339. [PMID: 26259862 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
19
|
McCarthy M. American Psychology Association colluded with Pentagon and CIA to protect interrogation program, report finds. BMJ 2015; 351:h3805. [PMID: 26169205 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- George J Annas
- From the Department of Health Law, Bioethics, and Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health (G.J.A., S.S.C.), and the Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine (S.S.C.) - both in Boston
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Seyffert M, Berofsky-Seyffert A. Waking Up to the Forensic and Ethics Risks of Systematic Sleep Deprivation. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2015; 43:132-136. [PMID: 26071500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Seyffert
- Dr. Seyffert is a Robert Wood Johnson VA Clinical Scholar and Clinical Lecturer in Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. He is also a Lieutenant Colonel in the Michigan Air National Guard as a Flight Surgeon. Ms. Berofsky-Seyffert is a freelance writer.
| | - Adrienne Berofsky-Seyffert
- Dr. Seyffert is a Robert Wood Johnson VA Clinical Scholar and Clinical Lecturer in Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. He is also a Lieutenant Colonel in the Michigan Air National Guard as a Flight Surgeon. Ms. Berofsky-Seyffert is a freelance writer
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McCarthy M. American Psychological Association colluded with US officials to bolster CIA torture program, report alleges. BMJ 2015; 350:h2380. [PMID: 25944627 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
23
|
|
24
|
Cymet T. Doing Harm: Physicians, Enemy Combatants, and Torture. Md Med 2015; 16:5. [PMID: 27487701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
|
25
|
Perechocky A. Los torturadores medicos: medical collusion with human rights abuses in Argentina, 1976-1983. J Bioeth Inq 2014; 11:539-551. [PMID: 24996628 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-014-9544-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/24/2013] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Medical collaboration with authoritarian regimes historically has served to facilitate the use of torture as a tool of repression and to justify atrocities with the language of public health. Because scholarship on medicalized killing and biomedicalist rhetoric and ideology is heavily focused on Nazi Germany, this article seeks to expand the discourse to include other periods in which medicalized torture occurred, specifically in Argentina from 1976 to 1983, when the country was ruled by the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional military regime. The extent to which medical personnel embedded themselves within the Proceso regime's killing apparatus has escaped full recognition by both scholars and human rights activists. This article reconstructs the narrative of the Proceso's human rights abuses to argue that health professionals knowingly and often enthusiastically facilitated, oversaw, and participated in every phase of the "disappearance," torture, and mass murder process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Perechocky
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, One Boston Medical Center Place, Dowling 1 South, Room 1322, Boston, MA, 02118, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Wertheimer
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - F G Miller
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shaw E. Offering castration to sex offenders: the significance of the state's intentions. J Med Ethics 2014; 40:594-595. [PMID: 23900292 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
|
28
|
Winslade WJ. Surgical castration, Texas law and the case of Mr T. J Med Ethics 2014; 40:591-592. [PMID: 24429669 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
|
29
|
Abstract
The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) have conducted visits and written reports criticising the surgical castration of sex offenders in the Czech Republic and Germany. They claim that surgical castration is degrading treatment and have called for an immediate end to this practice. The Czech and German governments have published rebuttals of these criticisms. The rebuttals cite evidence about clinical effectiveness and point out this is an intervention that must be requested by the sex offender and cannot occur without informed consent. This article considers a number of relevant arguments that are not discussed in these reports but which are central to how we might assess this practice. First, the article discusses the possible ways in which sex offenders could be coerced into castration and whether this is a decisive moral problem. Then, it considers a number of issues relevant to determining whether sex offenders are harmed by physical castration. The article concludes by arguing that sex offenders should not be coerced into castration, be that via threats or offers, but that there is no reason to think that this is occurring in the Czech Republic or Germany. In some cases, castration might be useful for reconfiguring a life that has gone badly awry and where there is no coercion, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment are mistaken about this being degrading treatment.
Collapse
|
30
|
Ryberg J, Petersen TS. Surgical castration, coercion and ethics. J Med Ethics 2014; 40:593-594. [PMID: 23782619 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Ryberg
- Department of Philosophy & Science Studies, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark Department of Philosophy, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Thomas S Petersen
- Department of Philosophy & Science Studies, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark Department of Philosophy, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McMillan J. Surgical castration, coercive offers and coercive effects: it is still not about consent. J Med Ethics 2014; 40:596. [PMID: 25122878 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- John McMillan
- Correspondence to Prof John R McMillan, Bioethics centre, University of Otago, Division of Health Sciences, PO Box 913, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand;
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
McCarthy M. American Psychological Association rejects demand to reopen complaint against Guantanamo Bay psychologist. BMJ 2014; 348:g1934. [PMID: 24598231 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
34
|
Xenakis SN. The role and responsibilities of psychiatry in 21st century warfare. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2014; 42:504-508. [PMID: 25492078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
|
35
|
McCarthy M. US health professionals helped in the torture of detainees, report says. BMJ 2013; 347:f6680. [PMID: 24192974 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f6680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
36
|
Abstract
Every infant has a right to bodily integrity. Removing healthy tissue from an infant is only permissible if there is an immediate medical indication. In the case of infant male circumcision there is no evidence of an immediate need to perform the procedure. As a German court recently held, any benefit to circumcision can be obtained by delaying the procedure until the male is old enough to give his own fully informed consent. With the option of delaying circumcision providing all of the purported benefits, circumcising an infant is an unnecessary violation of his bodily integrity as well as an ethically invalid form of medical violence. Parental proxy 'consent' for newborn circumcision is invalid. Male circumcision also violates four core human rights documents-the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Convention Against Torture. Social norm theory predicts that once the circumcision rate falls below a critical value, the social norms that currently distort our perception of the practice will dissolve and rates will quickly fall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Steven Svoboda
- Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, 2961 Ashby Avenue, Berkeley, California 94707, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Evidence proves that physician involvement in torture is widely practiced in society. Despite its status as an illegal act as established by multiple international organizations, mandates are routinely unheeded and feebly enforced. Philosophies condemning and condoning torture are examined as well as physicians' professional responsibilities and the manner in which such varying allegiances can be persuasive. Physician involvement in torture has proven detrimental to the core values of medicine and has tainted the field's commitment to individuals' health and well-being. Only when this complex issue is addressed using a multilevel approach will the moral rehabilitation of medicine begin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norain A Siddiqui
- Department of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, St. George's University, Grenada, West Indies
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alam MRJ. From civil war to forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2013; 41:444-446. [PMID: 24051599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Rose J Alam
- Georgetown University Hospital, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20007.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Eidelman L. [Israel Medical Association: Israeli physicians do not participate in torture]. Lakartidningen 2012; 109:2033. [PMID: 23240314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
|
40
|
Olofsson G. [Israeli physicians have to stop participating in torture]. Lakartidningen 2012; 109:1837-1838. [PMID: 23173407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
|
41
|
Pustilnik AC. Pain as a fact and heuristic: how pain neuroimaging illuminates moral dimensions of law. Cornell Law Rev 2012; 97:801-848. [PMID: 22754972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
In legal domains ranging from tort to torture, pain and its degree do important definitional work by delimiting boundaries of lawfulness and of entitlements. Yet, for all the work done by pain as a term in legal texts and practice, it has a confounding lack of external verifiability. Now, neuroimaging is rendering pain and myriad other subjective states at least partly ascertainable. This emerging ability to ascertain and quantify subjective states is prompting a "hedonic" or a "subjectivist" turn in legal scholarship, which has sparked a vigorous debate as to whether the quantification of subjective states might affect legal theory and practice. Subjectivists contend that much values-talk in law has been a necessary but poor substitute for quantitative determinations of subjective states--determinations that will be possible in the law's "experiential future." This Article argues the converse: that pain discourse in law frequently is a heuristic for values. Drawing on interviews and laboratory visits with neuroimaging researchers, this Article shows current and in-principle limitations of pain quantification through neuroimaging. It then presents case studies on torture-murder, torture, the death penalty, and abortion to show the largely heuristic role of pain discourse in law. Introducing the theory of "embodied morality," the Article describes how moral conceptions of rights and duties are informed by human physicality and constrained by the limits of empathic identification. Pain neuroimaging helps reveal this dual factual and heuristic nature of pain in the law, and thus itself points to the translational work required for neuroimaging to influence, much less transform, legal practice and doctrine.
Collapse
|
42
|
Allhoff F. Doctors and torture. Hastings Cent Rep 2012; 42:8. [PMID: 22616388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
|
43
|
Rushton S, Ingram A. Confronting violence, protecting health. Med Confl Surviv 2011; 27:187-190. [PMID: 22416565 DOI: 10.1080/13623699.2011.645143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
44
|
Burns-Cox CJ. Doctors and torture in Israel. Why the secrecy? BMJ 2011; 343:d5792; discussion 5794. [PMID: 21914747 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
45
|
Meyers A, Summerfield D. The campaign about doctors and torture in Israel two years on. BMJ 2011; 343:d5223. [PMID: 21846707 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
46
|
|
47
|
Abstract
Medical complicity in torture is prohibited by international law and codes of professional ethics. But in the many countries in which torture is common, doctors are frequently expected to assist unethical acts that they are unable to prevent. Sometimes these doctors face a dilemma: they are asked to provide diagnoses or treatments that respond to genuine health needs but that also make further torture more likely or more effective. The duty to avoid complicity in torture then comes into conflict with the doctor’s duty to care for patients. In this paper we argue that this dilemma is real and that sometimes the right thing for a doctor to do requires complicity in torture. We propose three criteria for determining when this is the case: the expected consequences of the doctor’s actions, the wishes of the patient, and the extent of the doctor’s complicity with wrongdoing. Finally, we suggest a way for medical associations to support physicians who face this dilemma while maintaining a commitment to clear principles that denounce torture.
Collapse
|
48
|
|
49
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US, the government authorized the use of "enhanced interrogation" techniques that were previously recognized as torture. While the complicity of US health professionals in the design and implementation of US torture practices has been documented, little is known about the role of health providers, assigned to the US Department of Defense (DoD) at the US Naval Station Guantánamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO), who should have been in a position to observe and document physical and psychological evidence of torture and ill treatment. METHODS AND FINDINGS We reviewed GTMO medical records and relevant case files (client affidavits, attorney-client notes and summaries, and legal affidavits of medical experts) of nine individuals for evidence of torture and ill treatment and documentation by medical personnel. In each of the nine cases, GTMO detainees alleged abusive interrogation methods that are consistent with torture as defined by the UN Convention Against Torture as well as the more restrictive US definition of torture that was operational at the time. The medical affidavits in each of the nine cases indicate that the specific allegations of torture and ill treatment are highly consistent with physical and psychological evidence documented in the medical records and evaluations by non-governmental medical experts. However, the medical personnel who treated the detainees at GTMO failed to inquire and/or document causes of the physical injuries and psychological symptoms they observed. Psychological symptoms were commonly attributed to "personality disorders" and "routine stressors of confinement." Temporary psychotic symptoms and hallucinations did not prompt consideration of abusive treatment. Psychological assessments conducted by non-governmental medical experts revealed diagnostic criteria for current major depression and/or PTSD in all nine cases. CONCLUSION The findings in these nine cases from GTMO indicate that medical doctors and mental health personnel assigned to the DoD neglected and/or concealed medical evidence of intentional harm.
Collapse
|
50
|
Lenzer J. Human rights group accuses US psychiatrists of unethical treatment of prisoners. BMJ 2011; 342:d1792. [PMID: 21422104 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d1792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|