Castor oil as booster for colon capsule endoscopy preparation reduction: A prospective pilot study and patient questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Preparation for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) requires a large liquid laxative volume for capsule excretion, which compromises the procedure's tolerability.

AIM

To assess the safety and utility of castor oil-boosted bowel preparation.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study including 20 patients (age range, 16-80 years; six men and 14 women) suspected of having colorectal disease was conducted at Kindai University Hospital from September 2017 to August 2019. All patients underwent CCE because of the following inclusion criteria: previous incomplete colonoscopy in other facility (n = 20), history of abdominal surgery (n = 7), or organ abnormalities such as multiple diverticulum (n = 4) and adhesion after surgery (n = 6). The exclusion criteria were as follows: Dysphagia, history of allergic reactions to the drugs used in this study (magnesium citrate, polyethylene glycol, metoclopramide, and castor oil), possibility of pregnancy, possibility of bowel obstruction or stenosis based on symptoms, or scheduled magnetic resonance imaging within 2 wk after CCE. The primary outcome was the capsule excretion rate within the battery life, as evaluated by the total large bowel observation rate, large bowel transit time, and bowel creasing level using a five-grade scale in different colorectal segments. The secondary outcomes were complications, colorectal lesion detection rates, and patients’ tolerability.

RESULTS

The castor oil-based regimen was implemented in 17 patients. Three patients cancelled CCE because they could tolerate castor oil, but not liquid laxatives. The capsule excretion rate within the battery life was 88% (15/17). The mean large bowel transit time was 236 min. Approximately 70% of patients had satisfactory colon cleansing levels. CCE detected colon polyps (14/17, 82%) and colonic diverticulum (4/12, 33%). The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy rates for detecting colorectal polyps (size ≥ 6 mm) were 76.9%, 75.0%, and 76.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy rates for detection of diverticulum were 100% each. Twelve patients (71%) rated CCE as more than “good”, confirming the new regimen’s tolerability. No serious adverse events occurred during this study.

CONCLUSION

The castor oil-based regimen could reduce bowel preparation dose and improve CCE tolerability.

Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level

Five years have passed since the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed in 2014. However, the diagnostic performance of this classification has not yet been established. We conducted a retrospective study and a systematic search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System On-Line. There were three retrospective single center studies about the diagnostic performance of this classification. In order to clarify this issue, we reviewed our study and three previous studies. This review revealed the diagnostic performance in regards to three important differentiations. (1) Neoplasia from non-neoplasia; (2) malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia; and (3) deep submucosal invasive cancer (D-SMC) from other neoplasia. The sensitivity in differentiating neoplasia from non-neoplasia was 98.1%-99.8%. The specificity in differentiating malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia was 84.7%-98.2% and the specificity in the differentiation D-SMC from other neoplasia was 99.8%-100.0%. This classification would enable endoscopists to identify almost all neoplasia, to appropriately determine whether to perform en bloc resection or not, and to avoid unnecessary surgery. This article is the first review about the diagnostic performance of the JNET classification. Previous reports about the diagnostic performance have all been retrospective single center studies. A large-scale prospective multicenter evaluation study is awaited for the validation.

Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for local recurrence after polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have not been identified. Additionally, the appropriate interval for endoscopic surveillance of colorectal tumors at high-risk of local recurrence has not been established.

AIM

To clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of recurrent lesions after endoscopic colorectal tumor resection and determine the appropriate interval.

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty patients (1412 colorectal tumors) who underwent polypectomy, EMR, or ESD and received endoscopic surveillance subsequently for more than one year to detect local recurrence were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological factors associated with local recurrence were determined via univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Local recurrence was observed in 31 of 360 (8.6%) patients [31 of 1412 (2.2%) lesions] after colorectal tumor resection. Piecemeal resection, tumor size of more than 2 cm, and the presence of villous components were associated with colorectal tumor recurrence after endoscopic resection. Of these three factors, the piecemeal resection procedure was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence. Colorectal tumors resected into more than five pieces were associated with a high risk of recurrence since the average period from resection to recurrence in these cases was approximately 3 mo. The period to recurrence in cases resected into more than 5 pieces was much shorter than that in those resected into less than 4 pieces (3.8 ± 1.9 mo vs 7.9 ± 5.0 mo, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence of endoscopically treated colorectal tumors depends upon the outcome of first endoscopic procedure. Piecemeal resection was the only significant risk factor associated with local recurrence after endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated polyp: A systematic review

The aim of the present review was to clarify how we should detect and diagnose sessile serrated polyps (SSP) endoscopically. A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE from January 2004 through March 2018. Nine findings: (i) proximal location; (ii) size >10 mm; (iii) irregular shape; (iv) indistinctive border; (v) cloud-like surface; (vi) mucus cap; (vii) rim of debris in white-light endoscopy; (viii) dilated vessels; and (ix) dilated crypts (pits) in image-enhanced endoscopy were considered to be candidate discriminators of SSP from hyperplastic polyps. Prospective studies in a general setting are warranted to validate the above-mentioned endoscopic features of SSP during real-time colonoscopy and to determine whether these features are useful for the differential diagnosis of SSP.

Endoscopic characteristics of colorectal serrated lesions

BACKGROUND/AIMS

With the recent changes of pathological concepts, colorectal serrated lesions can be now divided into traditional serrated adenoma, typical hyperplastic polyp and sessile serrated polyp. The aim of this study is to clarify the endoscopic differences among these three groups.

METHODOLOGY

A total number of 362 serrated lesions larger than 5mm were evaluated. These were detected with ordinary view and observed also with magnifying chromoendoscopic view. The final pathologic diagnosis of the resected specimens was made blinded.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between traditional serrated adenoma and sessile serrated polypconcerning location, configuration and color. In chromoendoscopy, most of sessile serrated polyps and typical hyperplastic polyps showed star-like pattern, in contrast with traditional serrated adenomas most of which had fernor pinecone-like pattern. The differential diagnosis between traditional sessile polyp and the other two was possible with high accuracy. On the other hand, endoscopic distinction between sessile serrated polyp and typical hyperplastic polyp was not easy, except that the location and size were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

We can endoscopically differentiate between traditional serrated adenoma and sessile serrated polyp or typical hyperplastic polyp, but it is difficult to differentiate between the latter two.

Early colorectal cancer: concept, diagnosis, and management

In colorectal cancers, although flat and depressed-type lesions are found by regular endoscopic view, magnification and pit-pattern observation are vital parts of the precise diagnosis of the lesion. The depressed-type lesions appear to have a prominent tendency to show malignant characteristics, and the recognition and timely treatment of such lesions is important for improving the morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer. Chromoscopy is mandatory for an accurate diagnosis of these lesions. The pit-pattern classification correlates well with actual histological findings and can provide important additional information prior to endoscopic treatment of the lesion.