Outcomes of Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Adult Patients With Coarctation of Aorta: Report From National Inpatient Sample

Coarctation of aorta (CoA) is a common congenital anomaly which portends patients to early diastolic and systolic heart failure. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of CoA on heart failure hospitalization. Using the national inpatient sample, the study compared the outcomes of heart failure hospitalization between patients with and without CoA. We noted increasing prevalence of CoA related heart failure admissions over the last decade. Heart failure patients with CoA were younger (mean age 57 vs 71.6 years, P < 0.001), had a longer length of stay (7.4 vs 5.4 days, P < 0.001), and a higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (6.5% vs 2.1%, P = 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 0.58, 3.62, P = 0.421) between both groups. These findings demonstrate that CoA increase healthcare resource utilization in patients admitted with heart failure without any significant increase in in-hospital mortality.

Peri- and Post-procedural Anticoagulation with Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices

In patients with atrial fibrillation and high stroke risk, anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists is the standard of care for stroke prevention. The benefit of anticoagulation is driven by attenuating the risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion offers an alternative therapeutic strategy for stroke prevention in patients with high bleeding risk or contraindications for long-term anticoagulation. This review of the current literature delineates the standard protocols of peri- and post-procedural anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion, the complications of the procedure, and the risk of device-related thrombosis and of incomplete occlusion of the appendage. Finally,the limitations and gaps in the literature are identified.

Prediction of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The role of machine learning

BACKGROUND

Atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is an important complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Application of machine learning could potentially be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM.

AIM

To apply machine learning to be used to predict pre-procedural risk for PPM.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 1200 patients who underwent TAVR (January 2014-December 2017) was performed. 964 patients without prior PPM were included for a 30-d analysis and 657 patients without PPM requirement through 30 d were included for a 1-year analysis. After the exclusion of variables with near-zero variance or ≥ 50% missing data, 167 variables were included in the random forest gradient boosting algorithm (GBM) optimized using 5-fold cross-validations repeated 10 times. The receiver operator curve (ROC) for the GBM model and PPM risk score models were calculated to predict the risk of PPM at 30 d and 1 year.

RESULTS

Of 964 patients included in the 30-d analysis without prior PPM, 19.6% required PPM post-TAVR. The mean age of patients was 80.9 ± 8.7 years. 42.1 % were female. Of 657 patients included in the 1-year analysis, the mean age of the patients was 80.7 ± 8.2. Of those, 42.6% of patients were female and 26.7% required PPM at 1-year post-TAVR. The area under ROC to predict 30-d and 1-year risk of PPM for the GBM model (0.66 and 0.72) was superior to that of the PPM risk score (0.55 and 0.54) with a P value < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The GBM model has good discrimination and calibration in identifying patients at high risk of PPM post-TAVR.

Safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty compared to stent-based-strategies with pulmonary vein stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is an uncommon but known cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children and can be managed with percutaneous re-vascularization strategies of pulmonary vein balloon angioplasty (PBA) or pulmonary vein stent implantation (PSI).

AIM

To study the safety and efficacy outcomes of PBA vs PSI in all patient categories with PVS.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of all studies comparing outcomes of patients evaluated by PBA vs PSI for PVS. We selected all published studies comparing PBA vs PSI for PVS with reported outcomes of restenosis and procedure-related complications in all patient categories. In adults, PVS following atrial fibrillation ablation and in children PVS related to congenital etiology or post-procedural PVS following total or partial anomalous pulmonary venous return repair were included. The patient-centered outcomes were risk of restenosis requiring re-intervention and procedural-related complications. The meta-analysis was performed by computing odds ratios (ORs) using the random effects model based on underlying statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies treating 768 severe PVS in 487 patients met our inclusion criteria. The age range of patients was 6 months to 70 years and 67% were males. The primary outcome of the re-stenosis requiring re-intervention occurred in 196 of 325 veins in the PBA group and 111 of 443 veins in the PSI group. Compared to PSI, PBA was associated with a significantly increased risk of re-stenosis (OR 2.91, 95%CI: 1.15-7.37, P = 0.025, I² = 79.2%). Secondary outcomes of the procedure-related complications occurred in 7 of 122 patients in the PBA group and 6 of 69 in the PSI group. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety outcomes between the two groups (OR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.23-3.76, P = 0.929), I² = 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

Across all patient categories with PVS, PSI is associated with reduced risk of re-intervention and is as safe as PBA and should be considered first-line therapy for PVS.

National Cardiovascular Data Registry Model Predicts Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)-based logistic regression model is available for clinicians to predict in-hospital all-cause mortality after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, this model has never been used to predict long-term all-cause mortality after PCI. Therefore, we sought to test the ability of the NCDR model to predict the short- and long-term risk of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing PCI. All patients undergoing PCI in the Mayo Clinic Health System were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic CathPCI registry. Patient-level demographic, clinical, and angiographic data from January 2006 to December 2017 were extracted from the registry. Patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) were excluded. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the ability of the NCDR model to predict outcomes of interest (6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality) after PCI. A total of 17,356 unique patients were included for the final analysis after excluding 165 patients who underwent CABG surgery. The mean age was 66.9 ± 12.5 years, and 71% were men. The 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality rates were 4.2% (n = 737), 5.8% (n = 1,005), 8.06% (n = 1,399), and 14.2% (n = 2,472), respectively. The AUCs of the NCDR model to predict 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year all-cause mortality were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.86), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80-0.84), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79-0.81), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.77-0.79), respectively. The NCDR model was able to accurately predict both short- and long-term all-cause mortality after PCI.

Challenging Case of Percutaneous Closure of Right Coronary Artery to Right Atrial Fistula

We demonstrate the percutaneous closure of a coronary fistula and subsequent utilization of a vascular plug in a patient with challenging anatomy.

Does a Gradient-Adjusted Cardiac Power Index Improve Prediction of Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Survival Over Cardiac Power Index?

PURPOSE

Cardiac power (CP) index is a product of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO). In aortic stenosis, however, MAP is not reflective of true left ventricular (LV) afterload. We evaluated the utility of a gradient-adjusted CP (GCP) index in predicting survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), compared to CP alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 975 patients who underwent TAVR with 1 year of follow-up. CP was calculated as (CO×MAP)/[451×body surface area (BSA)] (W/m²). GCP was calculated using augmented MAP by adding aortic valve mean gradient (AVMG) to systolic blood pressure (CP1), adding aortic valve maximal instantaneous gradient to systolic blood pressure (CP2), and adding AVMG to MAP (CP3). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed adjusting for baseline covariates. Receiver operator curves (ROC) for CP and GCP were calculated to predict survival after TAVR.

RESULTS

The mortality rate at 1 year was 16%. The mean age and AVMG of the survivors were 81±9 years and 43±4 mm Hg versus 80±9 years and 42±13 mm Hg in the deceased group. The proportions of female patients were similar in both groups (p=0.7). Both CP and GCP were independently associated with survival at 1 year. The area under ROCs for CP, CP1, CP2, and CP3 were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-0.72], 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60-0.70), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.61-0.71), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.58-0.68), respectively.

CONCLUSION

GCP did not improve the accuracy of predicting survival post TAVR at 1 year, compared to CP alone.

Management of adults with coarctation of aorta

Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a relatively common congenital cardiac defect often causing few symptoms and therefore can be challenging to diagnose. The hallmark finding on physical examination is upper extremity hypertension, and for this reason, CoA should be considered in any young hypertensive patient, justifying measurement of lower extremity blood pressure at least once in these individuals. The presence of a significant pressure gradient between the arms and legs is highly suggestive of the diagnosis. Early diagnosis and treatment are important as long-term data consistently demonstrate that patients with CoA have a reduced life expectancy and increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Surgical repair has traditionally been the mainstay of therapy for correction, although advances in endovascular technology with covered stents or stent grafts permit nonsurgical approaches for the management of older children and adults with native CoA and complications. Persistent hypertension and vascular dysfunction can lead to an increased risk of coronary disease, which, remains the greatest cause of long-term mortality. Thus, blood pressure control and periodic reassessment with transthoracic echocardiography and three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography or cardiac magnetic resonance) for should be performed regularly as cardiovascular complications may occur decades after the intervention.

Does Resting Cardiac Power Index Affect Survival Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac power index (CPI) is an integrative hemodynamic measure of cardiac pumping capability and is the product of the simultaneously measured mean arterial pressure and the cardiac output. We assessed the association between baseline resting CPI and survival post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively abstracted data of patients who underwent TAVR at the Mayo Clinic Foundation with follow-up data available at 1 year. Baseline demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic data were abstracted. CPI was calculated using the formula, (cardiac output x mean arterial blood pressure) / (451 x body surface area) W/m². Patients were divided into CPI <0.48 W/m² (group 1) and CPI ≥0.48 W/m² (group 2). Survival according to CPI was determined using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for covariates. Nine hundred and seventy-five patients were included in the final analysis. CPI in group 1 vs group 2 was 0.41 ± 0.05 W/m² vs 0.66 ± 0.14 W/m², respectively (P<.001, two-sided t-test). Patients in group 1 were more likely to be male and to have a prior history of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, transient ischemic attack, carotid artery disease, atrial fibrillation, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and moderate to severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. After adjusting for baseline covariates, a lower CPI was associated with higher 1-year mortality among patients undergoing TAVR (24.39% in group 1 vs 8.28% in group 2; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Low baseline CPI (<0.48 W/m²) confers higher mortality risk among patients undergoing TAVR and provides additional prognostic information, which can help risk-stratify patients.

Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in the contemporary era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Renal denervation (RDN) is a catheter-based ablation procedure designed to treat resistant hypertension (RH). The objective of our study is to determine the effect of RDN on blood pressure and renal function in patients with RH in comparison to medical therapy alone. We performed an extensive literature search for randomized control trials (RCT) reporting office and 24 hr. blood pressure changes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and 6 months. We calculated a weighted standardized mean difference of blood pressure and renal outcomes between RDN and control groups using random effects models. Our search yielded 608 studies of which we included 15 studies for the final analysis. A total of 857 patients were treated with RDN and 616 patients treated with medical therapy ± sham procedure. Only 5 studies were double-blinded RCT with sham control. The adjusted standardized mean difference in the change in office based systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.18; p = 0.14); 24 hr. systolic and diastolic pressures (p = 0.20; p = 0.18); and eGFR (p = 0.20) from baseline to 6 months is statistically insignificant with significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed that among sham controlled trials, 24 hr. systolic blood pressure showed a modest but statistically significant benefit favoring renal denervation in patients with RH. Our meta-analysis of 15 RCTs showed no significant benefit of RDN on blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Subgroup analysis of sham control studies showed a modest benefit in 24 hr. systolic blood pressure at 6 months with RDN.

Are we there yet with patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention in cryptogenic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background:

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure in stroke prevention.

Methods:

We searched Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane central database for randomized control trials assessing the incidence of recurrent stroke after patent foramen ovale closure when compared to medical therapy. Pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using the χ² test and inconsistency was quantified using the I² statistic.

Results:

Our search strategy yielded 71 articles. We included five studies with a total of 3440 patients. Median age in the device group was 45 (43, 5.5) years and in the medical group was 45 (44.5, 46) years; 52% were male, 27.7% of patients had an atrial septal aneurysm, 25% had hypertension, and 20.5% had diabetes mellitus. The median follow-up time was 44 (34.5–50) months. The pooled odds ratio of recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack and composite end point of stroke + transient ischemic attack + peripheral embolism in the patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy group were 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.25–0.63, I² = 57.5%), 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.61–1.42, I² = 0%), and 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.44–0.82, I² = 0%), respectively. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was found to be significantly higher in the patent foramen ovale closure group with odds ratio of 6 (95% confidence interval 3.13–11.4, I² = 33.5%). On subgroup analysis, patent foramen ovale closure appeared to benefit males and patients with a large shunt. Number needed to treat to prevent one recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale closure is 42. Number needed to harm to cause one atrial fibrillation with patent foramen ovale closure is 39.

Conclusion:

This meta-analysis of randomized trials concludes that percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure is effective in recurrent stroke prevention especially in males and in those with a large shunt.

Comparison of Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve to invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis

Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CTFFR) is an emerging non-invasive imaging modality to assess functional significance of coronary stenosis. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of CTFFR to invasive Fractional Flow reserve (FFR). Electronic search was performed to identify relevant articles. Pooled Estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated at the patient level as well as the individual vessel level using hierarchical logistic regression, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under the curve were estimated. Our search yielded 559 articles and of these 17 studies was included in the analysis. A total of 2,191 vessels in 1294 patients were analyzed. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR- and DOR with corresponding 95% CI at per-patient level were 83% (79-87), 72% (68-76), 3.0 (2.6-3.5), 0.23 (0.18-0.29) and 13 (9-18) respectively. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR- and DOR with corresponding 95% CI at per-vessel level were 85% (83-88), 76% (74-79), 3.6 (3.3-4.0), 0.19 (0.16-0.22) and 19 (15-24). The area under the SROC curve was 0.89 for both per patient level and at the per vessel level. In our meta-analysis, CTFFR demonstrated good diagnostic performance in identifying functionally significant coronary artery stenosis compared to the FFR.