Conventional versus oblique fiber-sparing endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

GERD is common after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Selective sparing of oblique fibers may reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis after POEM. In this study, we compared the incidence of GERD between conventional myotomy (CM) versus oblique fiber-sparing (OFS) myotomy in patients with achalasia.

METHODS

Eligible patients with type I and II achalasia who underwent POEM from January 2020 to October 2020 were randomized into 2 groups (CM and OFS myotomy). Exclusion criteria were type III achalasia, sigmoid esophagus, and history of Heller's myotomy. The primary study outcome was incidence of reflux esophagitis (at least grade B) in the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were reflux symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, clinical success, and adverse events.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients were randomized into CM (n = 58) and OFS myotomy (n = 57) groups. POEM was technically successful in all patients. Overall, reflux esophagitis was found in 56 patients (48.7%). The incidence of at least grade B esophagitis was similar in both groups (CM vs OFS myotomy: 25.9% vs 31.6%, P = .541). The mean number of reflux episodes (48.2 ± 36.6 vs 48.9 ± 40.3, P = .933), increased esophageal acid exposure >6% (45.5% vs 31.7%, P = .266), and high DeMeester scores (38.6% vs 41.5%, P = .827) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the rate of symptomatic reflux (GERD questionnaire score >7) or use of proton pump inhibitors at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Sparing of sling fibers has no significant impact on the incidence of significant reflux esophagitis after POEM. Novel strategies need to be explored to prevent reflux after POEM. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04229342.).

Single-Versus Multiple-Dose Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study (SMAPP Trial)

Infections are uncommon after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure. However, prophylactic antibiotics are routinely administered for variable duration during peri-operative period. In this study, we aimed to determine the difference in the rate of infections between single (SD-A) and multiple doses (MD-A) antibiotic prophylaxis groups. The study was a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial conducted at a single tertiary care centre from Dec 2018 to Feb 2020. Eligible patients undergoing POEM were randomized into SD-A and MD-A groups. SD-A group received one dose of antibiotic (IIIrd gen cephalosporin) within 30-min of POEM. In the MD-A group, the same antibiotic was administered for a total of three days. Primary aim of the study was to determine the incidence of infections in the two groups. Secondary outcomes included incidence of fever (> 100 °F), inflammatory markers [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), c-reactive protein(CRP)], serum procalcitonin and adverse events related to antibiotics. (NCT03784365). 114 patients were randomized to SD-A (57) and MD-A (57) antibiotic groups. Mean post-POEM CRP (0.8 ± 0.9 vs 1.5 ± 1.6), ESR (15.8 ± 7.8 20.6 ± 11.7) and procalcitonin (0.05 ± 0.04 0.29 ± 0.58) were significantly higher after POEM (p = 0.001). Post-POEM inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP and procalcitonin) were similar in both the groups. Fever on day-0 (10.5% vs 14%) and day-1 (1.7% vs 3.5%) was detected in similar proportion of patients. Post-POEM infections were recorded in 3.5% (1.7% vs 5.3%, p = 0.618). Single dose of antibiotic is non-inferior to multiple dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Elevation of inflammatory markers and fever after POEM represents inflammation and does not predict infection after POEM.

Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the last several decades. In general, NETs are slow-growing neoplasms and the data on the natural history is still evolving. The availability and improved utilization of advanced imaging modalities have allowed the selection of cases suitable for endotherapy. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a central imaging modality to assess the depth of infiltration in gastroduodenal as well as rectal NETs. Enhanced EUS modalities, including contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography, reliably differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from adenocarcinomas and may enable prediction of aggressive PNETs. With recent developments in therapeutic endoscopy, a large proportion of GEP-NETs can be safely managed endoscopically. Endoscopic resection techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), allow the safe removal of gastroduodenal and rectal NETs. Recent data indicate that modified EMR techniques may be superior to conventional EMR with regard to histologically complete resection. Device-assisted endoscopic full thickness resection is emerging as a safe and effective technique for upper gastrointestinal as well as rectal NETs. In selected cases with PNETs, who are otherwise unfit for surgery, EUS-guided ablation is increasingly being recognized as a safe treatment option. This review focusses on evidence-based approaches to endoscopic evaluation and the management of GEP-NETs with special emphasis on recent advancements.

Submucosal endoscopy: the present and future

Submucosal endoscopy or third-space endoscopy utilizes the potential space between the mucosal and muscularis layers of the gastrointestinal tract to execute therapeutic interventions for various diseases. Over the last decade, endoscopic access to the submucosal space has revolutionized the field of therapeutic endoscopy. Submucosal endoscopy was originally used to perform endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia cardia, and its use has grown exponentially since. Currently, submucosal endoscopy is widely used to resect subepithelial tumors and to manage refractory gastroparesis and Zenker's diverticulum. While the utility of submucosal endoscopy has stood the test of time in esophageal motility disorders and subepithelial tumors, its durability remains to be established in conditions such as Zenker's diverticulum and refractory gastroparesis. Other emerging indications for submucosal endoscopy include esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, Hirschsprung's disease, and esophageal strictures not amenable to conventional endoscopic treatment. The potential of submucosal endoscopy to provide easy and safe access to the mediastinum and peritoneal spaces may open doors to novel indications and rejuvenate the interest of endoscopists in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in the future. This review focuses on the current spectrum, recent updates, and future direction of submucosal endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract.

Outcomes of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment modality in adult patients with achalasia cardia. There are limited data regarding the efficacy and safety of POEM in pediatric achalasia. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of POEM in children and adolescents with achalasia cardia. Literature search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database for studies evaluating the outcome of POEM in pediatric achalasia between January 2010 and March 2021. Primary objective of the study was clinical success (Eckardt ≤ 3). Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure duration, adverse events , and gastroesophageal reflux after POEM. A total of 14 studies (419 children, 234 boys) were included in the review. The subtypes of achalasia were type I (30.6%), type II (63.8%), and type III (5.6%). Pooled rate of technical success was 97.1% (95% CI 94.5-98.5%; I² = 0). Pooled clinical success in intention to treat and per-protocol population was 88% (95% CI 84.4-90.9%; I² = 0) and 94.4% (95% CI 91.5-96.4%; I² = 0), respectively. Post-POEM, pooled mean reduction in Eckardt scores was 6.71 (95% CI 6.14 7.28; p < 0.001; I² = 81%). Pooled rate for overall adverse events was 12.9% (95% CI 7.4-21.7%; I² 64.5%), major adverse events was 4.2% (95% CI 2.4-7.4%), and erosive esophagitis was 26.3% (95% CI 17.5-37.7%; I² 51%). POEM is an effective procedure in children with achalasia. Future studies are required to determine the durability of response and comparative outcomes with other treatment modalities for achalasia.

Impact of modified techniques on outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A narrative review

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established frontline treatment modality for achalasia cardia. Since its initial description, several modifications have been proposed to the technique of POEM. Broadly speaking, these modifications follow the basic principles of submucosal endoscopy, but incorporate variations in the POEM technique, including the difference in the orientation of myotomy (anterior or posterior), length of myotomy (short or long), and thickness of myotomy (selective circular or full thickness). Some of these modifications have been shown to reduce procedural duration without compromising the efficacy of the POEM procedure. More recently, several alterations have been reported that intend to reduce gastroesophageal reflux after POEM. These include preservation of sling fibers during posterior POEM and addition of NOTES fundoplication to the POEM procedure. Although some of the modified techniques have been compared with the conventional techniques in quality trials, randomized studies are awaited for others. The incorporation of some of these modifications will likely make POEM a technically easy and safer modality in near future. This review aims to discuss the current evidence with regard to the impact of modified techniques on the outcome of POEM.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Drainage in Children with Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Endoscopic drainage is an established treatment modality for adult patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). Available data regarding the efficacy and safety of endoscopic drainage in pediatric patients are limited. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of endoscopic drainage in children with PFCs.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar for studies on the outcomes of endoscopic drainage with or without endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) guidance in pediatric patients with PFCs from inception to May 2021. The study's primary objective was clinical success, defined as resolution of PFCs. The secondary outcomes included technical success, adverse events, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (187 children, 70.3% male) were included in this review. The subtypes of fluid collection included pseudocysts (60.3%) and walled-off necrosis (39.7%). The pooled technical success rates in studies where drainage of PFCs were performed with and without EUS guidance were 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6-98%; I ²=0) and 93.9% (95% CI, 82.6-98%; I ²=0), respectively. The pooled clinical success after one and two endoscopic interventions were 88.7% (95% CI, 82.7-92.9%; I ²=0) and 92.3% (95% CI, 87.4-95.4%; I ²=0), respectively. The pooled rate of major adverse events was 6.3% (95% CI, 3.3-11.4%; I ²=0). The pooled rate of recurrent PFCs after endoscopic drainage was 10.4% (95% CI, 6.1-17.1%; I ²=0).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic drainage is safe and effective in children with PFCs. However, future studies are required to compare endoscopic and EUS-guided drainage of PFCs in children.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic resection is recommended for small duodenal neuroendocrine tumors DNETs. However, there is limited data on the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in DNETs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of ESD in DNETs.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients who underwent ESD for DNETs from January 2018 to December 2019 were analyzed, retrospectively. All the cases of ESD were performed with or without traction using rubber band and two endoclips. En-bloc resection, complete endoscopic resection (C-ER), complete pathological resection (C-PR), adverse events, and recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (19 males, 57.50 ± 9.32 years) underwent ESD for DNETs. DNETs measured ≤ 10 mm (7), 10-15 mm (12), and > 15 mm (1). ESD was performed with and without traction in 10 cases each. Mean operating time was 61 ± 17.38 min. En-bloc resection, C-ER, and C-PR were recorded in 90%, 95%, and 75%, respectively. Vertical margins were positive in five patients. Adverse events included perforations in 4 (20%) cases and major bleeding in one case. There was no recurrence at a mean follow-up of 17.20 ± 7.37 months.

CONCLUSION

ESD is feasible and effective for the management of DNETs. However, caution is advised due to a high risk of adverse events and pathologically incomplete resection.

POEM Is a Durable Treatment in Children and Adolescents With Achalasia Cardia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is emerging as an effective treatment for pediatric achalasia. There are limited data on the long-term efficacy of POEM in children and adolescents with achalasia. In this study, we aim to evaluate the outcomes of POEM at ≥4 years follow-up.

METHOD

The data of consecutive children who underwent POEM (September 2013-July 2021) and completed at least 4 years follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was clinical success (Eckardt ≤ 3) at ≥4 years follow-up. The secondary outcomes included the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and predictors of recurrent symptoms (Eckardt ≥2) after POEM.

RESULTS

A total of 69 children underwent POEM for achalasia during the study period. Of these, 41 (59.4%) children completed ≥4 years [mean 68.5 months (range 48-94)] follow-up, and 38 were included in the final analysis. The subtypes of achalasia included type I (28.9%), type II (60.5%), and type III (2.6%). There was a history of prior treatment in 11 children (28.9%). Clinical success was recorded in 36 (94.7%) patients who successfully underwent POEM. Recurrent symptoms (Eckardt ≥ 2) were noticed in 12 (31.6%) children at ≥4 years. On multivariate analysis, there were no identifiable factors which predicted recurrent symptoms after POEM. Symptomatic GERD and erosive esophagitis were detected in 13.8% (4/29) and 57.1% (8/14) of the children, respectively.

CONCLUSION

POEM is a durable treatment modality for achalasia in the pediatric population irrespective of the sub-type of achalasia and history of prior treatment.

Short versus long esophageal myotomy during peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials

BACKGROUND

: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established modality of treatment for achalasia cardia. Considerable variations exist in the technique of POEM with respect to the length and orientation of the myotomy. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the outcomes of short versus long myotomy during POEM.

METHODS

: We searched multiple databases from January 2010 to March 2021 to identify studies reporting on POEM. We selected studies that reported on comparative outcomes of POEM using short versus long myotomy. We performed a comparative analysis of clinical success, procedural duration, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and adverse events with short and long myotomy in POEM by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

: A total of 521 patients from five studies in which 241 patients were treated with short and 280 patients with long myotomy approaches were analyzed. The pooled rate for clinical success gave an odds ratio (OR) of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-3.26; I² = 0; P = 0.62); for hospital stay OR 0.22 (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.46; I² = 0; P = 0.08); for GERD by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.31-1.07; I² = 0; P = 0.08), and for adverse events OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.29-1.53; I² = 51; P = 0.34). Abnormal esophageal acid exposure was less frequent with OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.22-0.90; P = 0.02; I² = 0) and the procedure duration was significantly shorter in the short myotomy group with OR - 0.76 (95% CI - 1.00 to - 0.52; I² = 43; P =0.001).

CONCLUSION

: Short myotomy and long myotomy in POEM seem comparable with each other in terms of clinical success and adverse events. Short myotomy is associated with significantly shorter procedural duration and possibly reduced esophageal acid exposure compared with long myotomy.

Single balloon enteroscopy in children for evaluation of small bowel diseases in children: A large, tertiary center study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Device assisted enteroscopy is the cornerstone for small bowel evaluation. However, the data are limited in pediatric patients. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and utility of single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) in children.

METHODS

The data of children (≤18-years) who underwent SBE from November 2010 to July 2020 was analyzed, retrospectively. The safety and diagnostic yield of SBE were assessed.

RESULTS

189-SBE procedures (males 117, mean age 15.1 ± 2.76, range 3-18 years) were performed in 174-children. The indications for SBE were chronic abdominal pain in 119 (68.4%), gastrointestinal bleed 17 (9.8%), chronic diarrhea 17 (9.8%) and vomiting 13 (7.5%). Antegrade, retrograde and combined SBE were performed in 98 (51.8%), 77 (40.7%), 7 (3.7%) children, respectively. The mean length of small bowel intubation in antegrade and retrograde SBE groups were 168.9 ± 58.6 cm and 120.7 ± 52.1 cm, respectively. Overall, a positive finding was seen in 117 (67.2%) cases. The most common findings were ileal and jejunal ulcers with or without strictures in 76 (64.9%) children. A total of 18 therapeutic enteroscopic procedures were performed. There were no major adverse events.

CONCLUSION

SBE is a safe and effective procedure for the evaluation and management of small bowel diseases in children.

Double tunnel technique reduces technical failure during POEM in cases with severe submucosal fibrosis

Background and study aims  Submucosal fibrosis (SMF) is one of the major reasons for technical failure during per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of double tunnel technique (DT-POEM) on the technical success of POEM in cases with severe SMF. Patients and methods  Data from patients with achalasia in whom SMF was encountered during POEM from Jan 2013 to Jan 2020 at our center were retrospectively evaluated. The technical success and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed and compared between cases with SMF who underwent POEM via single tunnel versus DT-POEM technique. Results  A total of 1,150 patients underwent POEM during the study period. There were 14 technical failures (1.2 %). SMF and severe SMF was found in 104 (9 %) and 21 (1.8 %) patients, respectively. The majority of patients (17, 80.9 %) with severe SMF had type I achalasia. Overall, technical failures occurred in 14 cases (1.2 %) and severe SMF resulted in the majority of the technical failures (10, 71.4 %). DT-POEM was utilized in 11 cases (52.4 %) with severe SMF. The median procedure time with DT-POEM was 150 minutes (85-210). There were no major AEs and DT-POEM was technically successful in all the patients. The technical success of POEM in cases with SMF improved after the adoption of the double tunnel technique (98.4 % vs 68.3 %, P  = 0.0001). Conclusions  Severe SMF is the most common reason for technical failure during POEM. DT-POEM improves the technical success rates of POEM in patients with severe SMF.

Long-term Outcomes of Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Spastic Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Large, Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Spastic esophageal motility disorders (SEMD) are a rare group of motility disorders including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and Jackhammer esophagus (JHE). Limited data suggest that per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be effective in these disorders. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of POEM in SEMD.

METHODS

The data of patients with SEMD who underwent POEM (January 2013 to December 2019) were analyzed, retrospectively. The following outcomes were recorded: POEM procedure details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Clinical success was classified as immediate (<1 y), short-term (1 to 3 y), medium term (3 to 5 y), and long-term (>5 y).

RESULTS

A total of 1115 POEM procedures were performed during the study period for achalasia and nonachalasia spastic motility disorders. POEM was performed for SEMD in 74 (6.6%) patients including type III in 53, DES in 11, and JHE in 10 patients. Technical success was achieved in all the patients. The median follow-up for the entire group was 47.5 months (range: 2 to 77 mo). Clinical success at short-term (1 to 3 y) and long-term follow-up (>5 y) was attained in 85.2% and 82.6% patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clinical success between type III achalasia and JHE/DES. Mild and moderate adverse events were recorded in 21 (28.4%) cases. GERD was detected in 23 (56.1%) patients with 24-hour pH study. Erosive esophagitis and symptomatic GERD were found in 36 (48.6%) and 16 (21.6%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM is a safe, effective, and durable treatment modality for spastic motility disorders of the esophagus. However, GERD is found in about half of the patients mandating close monitoring after POEM.

Gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case-control study

Background and aim

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is high after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). GERD after POEM may be qualitatively different from GERD in patients without motility disorders. In this study, we aimed to analyze and compare different aspects of GERD between patients with post‐POEM GERD and nonachalasia GERD.

Methods

The data of patients with GERD after POEM (January 2018 to June 2019) were compared with that of a control group (nonachalasia GERD group), which included patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms without associated major motility disorders. Patients with lower esophageal sphincter pressure lower than 10 mmHg were excluded from the study. GERD was evaluated at 3 months after POEM. Esophageal acid exposure time higher than 4.2% was used to define GERD. The primary outcome of the study was comparison of GERD‐related quality of life and reflux symptom severity between the two groups. In addition, the severity of erosive esophagitis and reflux‐symptom association were also recorded in the two groups.

Results

A total of 100 patients were included in the study, with 50 patients in each group (post‐POEM GERD vs. controls). The baseline parameters were comparable between the two groups. Median interquartile range of GERD‐related quality of life score was significantly lower in the post‐POEM group (11 [0–23.3] versus 34 [24–44]; p < 0.001). The post‐POEM GERD group had significantly lower median heartburn (6.0 [0–16.3] versus 15.5 [7.5–24.8]; p = 0.001) and regurgitation scores (0 [0–6.0] versus 20.0 [12.3–25.0]; p < 0.001). Erosive esophagitis was more frequent in the post‐POEM group (28 [56%] versus 10 [20.4%], p = 0.001). Only three (6%) patients in the post‐POEM group had a positive reflux‐symptom association as compared with 28 (56%) patients in the control group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In selected patients with pH positive GERD after POEM, the symptoms are milder and reflux‐symptom association is poor in spite of more severe esophagitis as compared with controls.

What is known

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after per‐oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is common and subclinical

Data on GERD related quality of life and reflux‐symptom association after POEM is limited.

What is new here

Reflux symptoms after POEM are milder and have poor association with reflux episodes

Triviality of symptoms despite high acid exposure and severe esophagitis suggests esophageal hyposensitivity

Comparison of Short Versus Long Esophageal Myotomy in Cases With Idiopathic Achalasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Aims

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia. The technique of POEM is still evolving and the impact of length of esophageal myotomy on the outcomes of POEM is not known. In this study, we aim to compare the outcomes of short (3 cm) versus long (6 cm and above) esophageal myotomy in patients undergoing POEM for achalasia cardia.

Methods

Consecutive patients with idiopathic achalasia (type I and II) were randomized to receive short (3 cm) or long esophageal myotomy (≥ 6 cm). Both groups were compared for clinical success, operative time, adverse events, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Results

Seventy-one consecutive patients with type I and II achalasia underwent POEM with short (n = 34) or long (n = 37) esophageal myotomy techniques. Mean length of esophageal myotomy in short and long groups was 2.76 ± 0.41 and 7.97 ± 2.40, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean operative time was significantly shorter in short myotomy group (44.03 ± 13.78 minutes and 72.43 ± 27.28 minutes, P < 0.001). Clinical success was comparable in both arms at 1-year (Eckardt score 0.935 ± 0.929 vs 0.818 ± 0.983, P = 0.627). Improvement in objective parameters including integrated relaxation pressure and barium column height at 5 minutes was similar in both groups. GERD was detected in 50.88% patients with no significant difference in short and long myotomy groups (44.44% vs 56.67%, P = 0.431).

Conclusions

A short esophageal myotomy is non-inferior to long myotomy with regards to clinical success, adverse events, and GERD in cases with type I and II achalasia. Reduced operating duration favors short esophageal myotomy in these patients.

Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided tissue acquisition in children: A tertiary care center experience

Background and Objectives:

EUS is frequently utilized for tissue acquisition in adult patients. However, the literature is limited regarding the utility of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or biopsy (FNA or FNB) in children. In this study, we aim to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic utility of EUS-FNA/FNB in children with various gastrointestinal diseases.

Methods:

The data of children (≤18 years) who underwent EUS-FNA/FNB from March 2014 to June 2020 were analyzed, retrospectively. The following parameters were analyzed: technical success, adverse events, and impact on the final diagnosis.

Results:

Sixty-seven children (32 – boys, 14.8 ± 2.9 years, range 8–18 years), underwent EUS-guided tissue acquisition procedures using standard therapeutic echoendoscope during the study period. The indications included solid pancreatic lesions in 29 (43.3%), mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy in 30 (44.7%), cystic pancreatic lesions in 5 (7.5%), subepithelial lesions in 2 (3%), and retroperitoneal mass in 1 (1.5%). EUS-FNA and-FNB were performed in 42 and 25 children, respectively. All the procedures could be successfully performed and there was no major procedure-related adverse event. Minor adverse events included self-limiting throat pain (10) and abdominal pain (3), self-limited bleeding at puncture site (3), and transient fever (1). EUS-FNA/FNB provided a histopathological diagnosis in 59 (88.1%) children.

Conclusion:

EUS-guided tissue acquisition using standard echoendoscope is feasible and safe in the pediatric age group. EUS-FNA/FNB establishes diagnosis in majority of the children when performed for appropriate clinical indication.

Genetic Evaluation of Children with Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Several genetic risk factors have been identified in adults with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis (IARP). However, the literature regarding the genetics of IARP is sparse in children. In this study, we aimed to analyze the genetic risk factors in children with IARP.

METHODS

All children (< 18 years) with ARP from January 2015 to May 2018 were prospectively enrolled in the study. Children with a known cause of ARP like obstructive, toxic/metabolic, and autoimmune were excluded from the final analysis. Children with IARP underwent genetic testing for mutations/polymorphisms in genes known to predispose to pancreatitis including cationic trypsinogen protease serine 1 (PRSS1), serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR), chymotrypsin C (CTRC), claudin-2 (CLDN2) and cathepsin B (CTSB).

RESULTS

A total of 239 children (116 boys, 10.3 ± 3.7 years) were enrolled during the study period. Of these, 204 (85.35%) children were identified as IARP. The mean age of symptom onset and the number of pancreatitis episodes were 8.3 ± 3.7 years and 3.3 ± 1.8, respectively. A family history of pancreatitis was noted in 4.6% children. Mutations/polymorphisms in at least 1 gene were identified in 89.5% (129/144) children including SPINK1 in 41.9%, PRSS1 (rs10273639) in 58.2%, CTRC in 25.6%, CTSB in 54.9%, CLDN2 in 72.9%, and CFTR in 2.3%. There was no significant incidence of genetic mutations/polymorphisms in IARP with or without pancreas divisum (95.7 vs 88.4%; p = 0.467).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic alterations are present in the majority of the children with IARP. The incidence of genetic mutations is similar in children with or without pancreas divisum.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and tunneling procedures using a novel all-in-one bipolar device

Background and study aims  Recent innovations in devices and techniques have revolutionized the field of endoscopic resection procedures. In this study, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection and tunneling procedures with a novel, multipurpose bipolar device. Patients and methods  Data from consecutive patients who underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using a novel bipolar device (December 2019 to February 2020) were analyzed retrospectively. Procedure duration, technical success, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results  A total of 10 procedures were performed using the novel bipolar device during the study period. The procedures included POEM (n = 7), STER for esophageal sub-epithelial tumor (n = 1), ESD for rectal polyp (n = 1), and gastric neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1). POEM was successfully completed in all patients. In patients who underwent STER and ESD, en-bloc resection was achieved in all. Mean procedure time for submucosal tunneling procedures (POEM and STER) was 59.12 ± 31.12 minutes. The procedures were completed without the requirement for exchange of accessories in eight cases (80 %). There were no major AEs. Mild and moderate AEs occurred during POEM and included capno-peritoneum (n = 1), retroperitoneal CO ₂ (n = 1), and empyema (n = 1). Conclusion  ESD and tunneling procedures can be safely performed without the need for exchange of accessories using a novel bipolar device. Randomized comparison with conventional knives isrequired to confirm the utility of this device.