Unveiling APOL1 haplotypes in a predominantly African-American cohort of kidney transplant patients: a novel classification using probe-independent quantitative real-time PCR

Introduction

Apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1) is a primate-specific protein component of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Two variants of APOL1 (G1 and G2), provide resistance to parasitic infections in African Americans but are also implicated in kidney-related diseases and transplant outcomes in recipients. This study aims to identify these risk variants using a novel probe-independent quantitative real-time PCR method in a high African American recipient cohort. Additionally, it aims to develop a new stratification approach based on a haplotype-centric model.

Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from recipient PBMCs using SDS lysis buffer and proteinase K. A quantitative PCR assay with modified forward primers and a common reverse primer enabled us to quantitatively identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the 6-bp deletion. Additionally, we used Sanger sequencing to verify our QPCR findings.

Results

Our novel probe-independent qPCR effectively distinguished homozygous wild-type, heterozygous SNPs/deletions, and homozygous SNPs/deletions, with at least 4-fold differences. A high prevalence of APOL1 variants was observed (18% two-risk alleles, 34% one-risk allele) in our recipient cohort. Intriguingly, no significant impact of recipient APOL1 variants on transplant outcomes was observed up to 12-month of follow-ups. Ongoing research will encompass more time points and a larger patient cohort, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of G1/G2 variant subgroups categorized by new haplotype scores, enriching our understanding.

Conclusion

Our cost-effective and rapid qPCR technique facilitates APOL1 genotyping within hours. Prospective and retrospective studies will enable comparisons with long-term allograft rejection, potentially predicting early/late-stage transplant outcomes based on haplotype evaluation in this diverse group of kidney transplant recipients.

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients from SARS-CoV-2-Infected versus Noninfected Deceased Donors

BACKGROUND

Acceptable post-transplant outcomes were reported in kidney transplant recipients from donors with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, there are no comparative studies with well-matched controls.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective observational study, which included three transplant centers in the United States, enrolled 61 kidney recipients from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected deceased donors. Using optimal matching methods, we matched every recipient to three comparators receiving kidneys from SARS-CoV-2-negative deceased donors with otherwise highly similar characteristics in the same transplant centers to compare 6-month eGFR.

RESULTS

Among recipients of SARS-CoV-2-infected donor kidneys, one recipient died with a functional graft within 6 months. Mean 6-month eGFR was not significantly different between SARS-CoV-2-infected and noninfected donor groups (55±21 and 57±25 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively; P = 0.61). Six-month eGFR in recipients from SARS-CoV-2-infected donors who died of reasons other than COVID-19 was not significantly different from those from SARS-CoV-2-negative donors (58±22 and 56±25 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively; P = 0.51). However, recipients from donors who died of COVID-19 had significantly lower 6-month eGFR than those from SARS-CoV-2-negative donors (46±17 and 58±27 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively; P = 0.03). No donor-to-recipient SARS-CoV-2 transmission was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Six-month eGFR was not significantly different between recipients of kidneys from SARS-CoV-2-infected and noninfected donors. However, those receiving kidneys from donors who died of COVID-19 had significantly lower 6-month eGFR. Donor-to-recipient SARS-CoV-2 transmission was not observed.

Unveiling APOL1 Haplotypes: A Novel Classification Through Probe-Independent Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Introduction

Apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1) is a primate-specific protein component of high- density lipoprotein (HDL). Two variants of APOL1 (G1 and G2), provide resistance to parasitic infections in African Americans but are also implicated in kidney-related diseases and transplant outcomes in recipients. This study aims to identify these risk variants using a novel probe- independent quantitative real-time PCR method in a high African American recipient cohort. Additionally, it aims to develop a new stratification approach based on haplotype-centric model.

Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from recipient PBMCs using SDS lysis buffer and proteinase K. Quantitative PCR assay with modified forward primers and a common reverse primer enabled us to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the 6-bp deletion quantitatively. Additionally, we used sanger sequencing to verify our QPCR findings.

Results

Our novel probe-independent qPCR effectively distinguished homozygous wild-type, heterozygous SNPs/deletion, and homozygous SNPs/deletion, with at least 4-fold differences. High prevalence of APOL1 variants was observed (18% two-risk alleles, 34% one-risk allele) in our recipient cohort. Intriguingly, up to 12-month follow-up revealed no significant impact of recipient APOL1 variants on transplant outcomes. Ongoing research will encompass more time points and a larger patient cohort, allowing a comprehensive evaluation of G1/G2 variant subgroups categorized by new haplotype scores, enriching our understanding.

Conclusions

Our cost-effective and rapid qPCR technique facilitates APOL1 genotyping within hours. Prospective and retrospective studies will enable comparisons with long-term allograft rejection, potentially predicting early/late-stage transplant outcomes based on haplotype evaluation in this diverse group of kidney transplant recipients.

CMV specific T cell immune response in hepatitis C negative kidney transplant recipients receiving transplant from hepatitis C viremic donors and hepatitis C aviremic donors

Kidney transplants (KT) from hepatitis C (HCV) viremic donors to HCV negative recipients has shown promising renal outcomes, however, high incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia were reported. We performed a prospective cohort study of 52 HCV negative KT recipients from Methodist University Hospital including 41 receiving transplants from HCV aviremic donors and 11 from HCV viremic donors. CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immunity was measured by intracellular flow cytometry assay. Primary outcome was the development of positive CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response in the entire cohort and each subgroup. The association between donor HCV status and CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models. Mean recipient age was 48 ± 13 years, with 73% male and 82% African American. Positive CMV specific CD4+ and CD8 + T cell immune response was found in 53% and 47% of the cohort at 1 month, 65% and 70% at 2 months, 80% and 75% at 4 months, 89% and 87% at 6 months, and 94% and 94% at 9 months post-transplant, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of positive CMV specific T cell immune response between recipients of transplants from HCV aviremic donors compared to HCV viremic donors in unadjusted (for CD8+: HR = 1.169, 95%CI: 0.521-2.623; for CD4+: HR = 1.208, 95%CI: 0.543-2.689) and adjusted (for CD8+: HR = 1.072, 95%CI: 0.458-2.507; for CD4+: HR = 1.210, 95%CI: 0.526-2.784) Cox regression analyses. HCV viremia in donors was not associated with impaired development of CMV specific T cell immunity in this cohort.

Tuberculous meningitis in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

Although the elderly population remains at high risk for tuberculosis, studies addressing tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in this age group are scarce. The present study aimed to evaluate the spectrum and outcome of geriatric TBM and document differences between older and young patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in the adult TBM patients admitted at PGIMER, Chandigarh (India). Consecutive older patients aged 60 years and above were enrolled from January 2019 to December 2020, and young adults aged 18-59 years were enrolled from July 2019 to December 2019.

RESULTS

Fifty-five older patients with a mean age of 66.6 years and 73 young patients with a mean age of 35.1 years were enrolled. At admission, older patients were more likely to have altered mental status (96.4% vs. 78.1%, P = 0.003) and advanced disease with British medical research council staging 2 or 3 (98.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 0.043); however, headache (38.2% vs. 67.1%, P = 0.001), vomiting (18.2% vs. 35.6%, P = 0.030) and fever (80.0% vs. 91.8%, P = 0.052) were less common. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities were less marked in older patients, with a significant difference in median total cells (70 vs. 110/µl, P = 0.013). Hydrocephalous and infarct were common neuroimaging abnormalities in both groups; however, tuberculomas were significantly less in the elderly (15.1% vs. 35.2%, P = 0.012). Older patients had a significantly low survival rate (56.4% vs. 76.7%, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in clinical, CSF and radiological characteristics exist between elderly and young TBM patients, with survival remains dismal in the elderly.

Association of donor hepatitis C virus infection status and risk of BK polyomavirus viremia after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) into HCV-negative recipients has become more common. However, the risk of complications such as BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains unknown. We assembled a retrospective cohort at four centers. We matched recipients of HCV-viremic kidneys to highly similar recipients of HCV-aviremic kidneys on established risk factors for BKPyV. To limit bias, matches were within the same center. The primary outcome was BKPyV viremia ≥1000 copies/ml or biopsy-proven BKPyV nephropathy; a secondary outcome was BKPyV viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml or nephropathy. Outcomes were analyzed using weighted and stratified Cox regression. The median days to peak BKPyV viremia level was 119 (IQR 87-182). HCV-viremic KT was not associated with increased risk of the primary BKPyV outcome (HR 1.26, p = .22), but was significantly associated with the secondary outcome of BKPyV ≥10 000 copies/ml (HR 1.69, p = .03). One-year eGFR was similar between the matched groups. Only one HCV-viremic kidney recipient had primary graft loss. In summary, HCV-viremic KT was not significantly associated with the primary outcome of BKPyV viremia, but the data suggested that donor HCV might elevate the risk of more severe BKPyV viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml. Nonetheless, one-year graft function for HCV-viremic recipients was reassuring.

Are Ayurvedic medications store house of heavy metals?

Ayurvedic formulations are widely used and perceived as safer medicine and subjected to be self-prescribed. However, recent reports have demonstrated adulterating these drugs with toxic quantities of heavy metals. To study the magnitude of the problem in Indian-manufactured Ayurvedic medications, we randomly collected common over-the-counter Ayurvedic preparations from the licensed Ayurvedic shops in the local markets of Chandigarh in 2017. The samples were analyzed to identify and quantify eight metal ions, including mercury, arsenic, lead, cadmium, zinc, iron, copper, and chromium, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. The permissible limit set by the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) for herbal medicines was followed to define the high metal concentrations. Out of 43 Ayurvedic preparations, 42 were analyzed. Heavy metals were detected in all formulations. The median (range) concentrations (in μg/g or mg/kg) of the metals were quantified as follows- mercury, 13.52 (0.00-61 095.99); arsenic, 0.00 (0.00-1038.83); lead, 1.40 (0.00-57.09); zinc, 84.2200 (26.48-22 519.03); iron, 1356.21 (128.24-136 835.25); copper, 17.1450 (0.00-12 756.86) and chromium, 20.9050 (0.00-2717.58). The metal contents above the FAO/WHO-mandated limit for zinc, mercury, arsenic, and lead were detected in 35, 29, 6, and 2 formulations, respectively. All medications contained detectable quantities of zinc and iron. Copper was detected in all except one. Cadmium was not found in any sample. Ayurvedic medications have a high prevalence of heavy metals. An evaluation of the sources of contamination and the necessary drug safety regulations are required.

OUP accepted manuscript

Introduction

We recently derived a simplified 3-point PGI score (representing blood pH < 7.25, Glasgow coma scale [GCS] score < 13, and impaired systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 90 mm Hg), which accurately predicted in-hospital case fatality ratio (CFR) in acute aluminum phosphide poisoning. The present study aimed to validate the PGI score and compare it with Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II scores.

Patients and Methods

We performed a prospective cohort study in adult patients with aluminum phosphide ingestion admitted in PGIMER, Chandigarh (India), from April 2013 to August 2014. A univariant analysis detected the association of various baseline variables with CFR. Correlation of the PGI score with SOFA, SAPS-II, and APACHE-II scores was performed using Spearman's correlation (r_s , range -1 to +1) and scatter plots.

Results

Seventy-six patients were enrolled (mean age, 28.3 years; 41 males). CFR was 60.5%. PGI score variables-pH, GCS, and impaired SBP predicted CFR (P-value <0.001). Among patients with a total PGI score of 3 or 2, 100% died, compared with 50% in score 1 and 10.7% in score 0. Baseline PGI, SOFA, SAPS-II, and APACHE-II scores predicted CFR (P-value <0.001). There was a positive correlation between the PGI score and SOFA score (r_s , 0.855), SAPS-II score (r_s , 0.861), and APACHE-II score (r_s , 0.883). The P-value for all r_s values was <0.001.

Conclusion

The PGI score is a validated toxidrome-specific and simplified risk-stratification tool. Validation in other populations is warranted to confirm its routine use.

H. pylori Pattern Gastritis with Negative Helicobacter Immunohistochemical Stain: Does A Specific Comment in Pathology Report Impact Clinical Management?

Introduction/Objective

The clinical significance of H. pylori (HP) pattern of gastritis with a negative Helicobacter IHC stain on gastric biopsy is unclear. Some pathologists report this pattern in cases that are highly suggestive of HP infection with a comment raising the possibility of HP infection; however, the subsequent clinical management of these patients has not been well described.

Methods/Case Report

We conducted a retrospective comparison study of patients with gastric biopsy between 2016 and 2019. Group 1 included patients with chronic active or chronic inactive gastritis and negative HP IHC with a comment stating the gastritis pattern is suggestive of HP. Group 2 included patients with chronic active or chronic inactive gastritis and negative HP IHC with no comment about HP pattern.

Results (if a Case Study enter NA)

We identified 60 patients in Group 1 which were compared to 63 patients in Group 2. Group 1 more frequently had history of HP (48.3% vs. 29.1%, p&lt;0.05). After diagnosis, Group 1 more frequently received treatment (51.7% vs. 20.6%, p&lt;0.001). Of those who received treatment, Group 1 more frequently received HP treatment (triple or quadruple therapy; 21.7% vs. 1.6%, p&lt;0.001). History of HP did not affect whether a patient was treated (p&gt;0.05). Following post-biopsy HP treatment, more patients in Group 1 received fecal antigen test (23.7% vs. 5.5%, p&lt;0.01). Age, gender, NSAID and PPI use did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Adding the diagnostic comment raising the possibility of HP for patients with HP pattern gastritis with negative HP IHC changes clinical management and it is independent of patients’ prior HP history.

Association between ezetimibe usage and hepatitis C RNA levels in uninfected kidney transplant recipients who received hepatitis C infected kidneys

Kidney transplantation (KT) from hepatitis C virus infected (HCV+) donors to HCV negative recipients achieve excellent graft function but have relatively higher rates of post-KT co-infections presumably due to prolonged HCV viremia in transmission-and-treat approach. Ezetimibe acts as an antagonist of Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 receptor required for HCV entry and theoretically can reduce HCV viremia. However, no data is available to examine the role of ezetimibe as a bridge therapy between KT surgery and direct acting antiviral (DAA) initiation. A retrospective cohort study including 70 HCV+ to HCV negative KT recipients from Methodist University Hospital and Vanderbilt University Medical Center was performed to determine the association between ezetimibe usage and HCV viremia. Twenty patients received ezetimibe daily while 50 patients did not. Primary outcome of study was mean HCV RNA level at 1-2 weeks post-KT and before initiation of DAA. Median (IQR) viral load (VL) in log copies/ml was one log lower in ezetimibe group versus non-ezetimibe group (4.1 [3.7-5.3] vs. 5.1 [4.4-5.5], P = .01), and highest VL was also lower in ezetimibe group (4.2 [3.7-5.4] vs. 5.4 [4.7-5.9], P = .006). We concluded that ezetimibe bridge therapy might be associated with reduction in HCV VL while waiting for DAA initiation in HCV+ to HCV negative KT recipients.

Factors associated with hepatitis C antibody seroconversion after transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C infected donors to hepatitis C naïve recipients

Background

We aimed to assess the probability and factors associated with the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody among HCV seronegative kidney transplant recipients receiving HCV-infected (nucleic acid testing positive) donor kidneys.

Methods

This is a retrospective review examining HCV antibody seroconversion of all kidney transplant recipients receiving an organ from an HCV-infected donor between 1 March 2018 and 2 December 2019 at a high-volume kidney transplant center in the southeast United States.

Results

Of 97 patients receiving HCV-infected kidneys, the final cohort consisted of 85 recipients with 5 (5.9%) recipients noted to have HCV antibody seroconversion in the setting of HCV viremia. The HCV RNA level at closest time of antibody measurement was higher in the seroconverted patients versus the ones who never converted [median and (interquartile range): 1,091,500 (345,000–8,360,000) vs 71,500 (73–313,000), p = 0.02]. No other significant differences including type of immunosuppression were noted between the HCV antibody positive group and HCV antibody negative group. Donor donation after cardiac death status [Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was: 8.22 (1.14–59.14)], donor age [OR (95% CI) (+5 years) was: 3.19 (1.39–7.29)] and Kidney Donor Profile Index [OR (95% CI) (+1) was:1.07 (1.01–1.15)] showed a statistically significant association with HCV seroconversion.

Conclusions

HCV antibody should not be considered routine screening for presence of infection in previously HCV naïve kidney transplant recipients receiving kidneys from HCV-infected donors, as only a modest percentage have antibody despite active viremia. The assessment of HCV viral load should be routine in all transplant recipients receiving organs from public health service increased risk donors.

SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid

Understanding the pathophysiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains a significant challenge of our times. The gingival crevicular fluid being representative of systemic status and having a proven track record of detecting viruses and biomarkers forms a logical basis for evaluating the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The study aimed to assess gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in 33 patients who were deemed to be COVID-19 positive upon nasopharyngeal sampling. An attempt was also made to comparatively evaluate it with saliva in terms of its sensitivity, as a diagnostic fluid for SARS-CoV-2. GCF and saliva samples were collected from 33 COVID-19-confirmed patients. Total RNA was extracted using NucliSENS easyMAG (bioMérieux) and eluted in the elution buffer. Envelope gene (E gene) of SARS-CoV-2 and human RNase P gene as internal control were detected in GCF samples by using the TRUPCR SARS-CoV-2 RT qPCR kit V-2.0 (I) in an Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time machine. A significant majority of both asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients exhibited the presence of the novel coronavirus in their GCF samples. Considering the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal swab sampling as gold standard, the sensitivity of GCF and saliva, respectively, was 63.64% (confidence interval [CI], 45.1% to 79.60%) and 64.52% (CI, 45.37% to 80.77%). GCF was found to be comparable to saliva in terms of its sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2. Saliva samples tested positive in 3 of the 12 patients whose GCF tested negative, and likewise GCF tested positive for 2 of the 11 patients whose saliva tested negative on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The results establish GCF as a possible mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which is the first such report in the literature, and also provide the first quantifiable evidence pointing toward a link between the COVID-19 infection and oral health.

Transplantation of Kidneys From Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Donors to Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Recipients: One-Year Kidney Allograft Outcomes

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Transplant centers in the United States are increasingly willing to transplant kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected (HCV⁺) donors into HCV^- recipients. We studied the association between donor HCV infection status and kidney allograft function and posttransplantation allograft biopsy findings.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We examined 65 HCV^- recipients who received a kidney from a HCV⁺ donor and 59 HCV^- recipients who received a kidney from a HCV^- donor during 2018 at a single transplant center.

EXPOSURE

Predictor(s) of donor infection with HCV.

OUTCOMES

Kidney allograft function and allograft biopsy findings during the first year following transplantation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

We compared estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), findings on for-cause and surveillance protocol biopsies, development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and patient and allograft outcomes during the first year following transplantation between recipients of HCV⁺ and HCV^- kidneys. We used linear regression to estimate the independent association between allograft function and HCV viremic status of the kidney donor.

RESULTS

The mean age of recipients was 52 ± 11 (SD) years, 43% were female, 19% and 80% of recipients were White and Black, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between the HCV⁺ and HCV^- groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the HCV⁺ and HCV^- groups in delayed graft function rates (12% vs 8%, respectively); eGFRs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-transplantation; proportions of patients with cellular rejection (6% vs 7%, respectively); and proportions with antibody-mediated rejection (7% vs 10%, respectively) or de novo DSAs (31% vs 20%, respectively). HCV viremic status was not associated with eGFR at 3, 6, 9, or 12 months.

LIMITATIONS

Generalizability from a single-center study and small sample size was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients of kidneys from donors infected with HCV had similar kidney allograft function and probability of rejection in the first year after transplantation compared to those who received kidneys from donors without HCV infection.

The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection after deceased-donor kidney transplantation from hepatitis-C antibody positive donors to hepatitis-C antibody negative recipients

BACKGROUND

Deceased-donor kidney transplantation (KT) from hepatitis C (HCV)-infected donors into HCV-uninfected recipients (HCV D+/R-) could become standard care in the near future. However, HCV viral replication by viral transmission might lead to a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in these recipients.

METHODS

A national-registry-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data set. We assessed the incidence of CMV infection in HCV antibody (Ab) negative recipients receiving kidneys from HCV Ab positive (HCVAb D+/R-) and negative (HCVAb D-/R-) donors. The risk of CMV infection was analyzed by Cox regression analysis in a propensity score (PS) matched-cohort of HCVAb D+/R- (n = 950) versus HCVAb D-/R- (n = 950). Sensitivity analysis was also conducted in the entire cohort (n = 181 082).

RESULTS

The mean age at baseline was 54 years, 75% were male, and 55% of the patients were African American in PS-matched cohort. Compared to the HCVAb D-/R - patients, recipients with HCVAb D+/R - showed identical probability for the incidence of CMV infection (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.82-1.22). In the sensitivity analysis, compared to the HCVAb D-/R - patients, the HCVAb D+/R - group had a significantly lower risk of CMV infection in the unadjusted analysis (HR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.65-0.85), while this risk difference disappeared after the adjusted analysis (HR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87-1.14).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CMV infection was similar in recipients who received HCVAb D + and HCVAb D - KT. Further studies are needed to assess this association in KT from HCV nucleic acid positive donors.

Outcomes of critically ill solid organ transplant patients with COVID-19 in the United States

National data on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) solid organ transplant (SOT) patients are limited. We analyzed data from a multicenter cohort study of adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 68 hospitals across the United States from March 4 to May 8, 2020. From 4153 patients, we created a propensity score matched cohort of 386 patients, including 98 SOT patients and 288 non-SOT patients. We used a binomial generalized linear model (log-binomial model) to examine the association of SOT status with death and other clinical outcomes. Among the 386 patients, the median age was 60 years, 72% were male, and 41% were black. Death within 28 days of ICU admission was similar in SOT and non-SOT patients (40% and 43%, respectively; relative risk [RR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.22). Other outcomes and requirement for organ support including receipt of mechanical ventilation, development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and receipt of vasopressors were also similar between groups. There was a trend toward higher risk of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in SOT vs. non-SOT patients (37% vs. 27%; RR [95% CI]: 1.34 [0.97-1.85]). Death and organ support requirement were similar between SOT and non-SOT critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Organophosphate induced delayed neuropathy after an acute cholinergic crisis in self-poisoning

INTRODUCTION

Despite organophosphate pesticide is the most prevalent cause of acute poisoning in low- and middle-income countries, data on organophosphate induced delayed neuropathy (OPIDN) are limited. We aimed to characterize organophosphates' long-term effects on the peripheral nervous system after an acute cholinergic crisis in adults.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study in an academic hospital of north India in patients aged 13-40 years with acute organophosphate ingestion. After resolving the cholinergic crisis, the patients were followed for six months with neurologic assessments, including history, neurologic examination, and nerve conduction study (NCS).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were recruited to the study. All but one had normal neurological examination and NCS at discharge from hospital a median duration of six days (interquartile range, 3-10) after self-poisoning. Eight (34.8%) developed OPIDN during the six-month follow-up. Three patients had symptomatic neuropathy, and NCS detected subclinical peripheral nerve involvement in five. All cases were associated with chlorpyrifos ingestion (8/17 total chlorpyrifos cases). Two OPIDN cases had foot drop and gait ataxia at three-month which persist at six-month. One patient had distal paresthesia at three months, which improved at a six-month follow-up. NCS in OPIDN cases invariably revealed axonal degeneration, injury to motor fibers more than sensory fibers, and frequent peroneal nerve involvement. None of the baseline characteristics, including the ingested amount, predicted clinical or subclinical OPIDN in chlorpyrifos self-poisoned patients on a univariant analysis.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral nerve involvement is not uncommon after recovery from a cholinergic crisis in chlorpyrifos self-poisoning and debilitating in some patients. Detection of subclinical injury on NCS may provide an early window to prevent severe symptomatic neuropathy.

Donor hepatitis C antibody positivity misclassifies kidney donor profile index in non-hepatitis C-infected donors: time to revise the kidney donor profile index - a retrospective cohort study

The kidney donor profile index (KDPI) defines an hepatitis C (HCV) positive donor based on HCV antibody (Ab) and/or nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) positivity, with donors who are not actively infected (Ab+/NAT-) also classified as HCV positive. From Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients dataset, we identified HCV-negative recipients, who received a kidney transplant from HCV Ab+/NAT- (n = 116) and HCV Ab-/NAT- (n = 25 574) donor kidneys. We then compared recipients' estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 months in matched cohorts, using combined exact matching (based on KDPI) and propensity score matching. We created two separate matched cohorts: for the first cohort, we used the allocation KDPI, while for the second cohort we used an optimal KDPI, where the HCV component of KDPI was considered negative in Ab+/NAT- patients. The mean ± SD age of the allocation KDPI-matched cohort at baseline was 59 ± 10 years, 69% were male, 61% were white. Recipients' eGFR at 6 months after transplantation was significantly higher in the HCV Ab+/NAT- group compared to the HCV Ab-/NAT- group (61.1 ± 17.9 vs. 55.6 ± 18.8 ml/min/1.73 m² , P = 0.011) in the allocation KDPI-matched cohort, while it was similar (61.8 ± 19.5 vs. 62.1 ± 20.1 ml/min/1.73 m² , P = 0.9) in the optimal KDPI-matched cohort. Recipients who received HCV Ab positive, but NAT-negative donor kidneys did not experience worse 6-month eGFR than correctly matched HCV Ab-/NAT- recipients.

Coinfection of H1N1 Influenza and Scrub Typhus-A Review

The H1N1 influenza infection usually coincides with the typical scrub typhus season in North India. This leads to diagnostic difficulties due to their similar and non-specific symptoms. We describe three patients with confirmed co-infection of pandemic (H1N1) influenza and scrub typhus who had presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review of database yielded one case of scrub typhus and H1N1 influenza co-infection reported from South Korea. Co-infection of influenza with tropical infections may not be uncommon in endemic countries and hence a high index of suspicion on the part of physicians coupled with appropriate investigations are needed. The true burden of co-infections needs to be evaluated during outbreaks of influenza in a systematic manner.

Exacerbations of Severe Asthma While on Anti-IL-5 Biologics

Anti-interleukin 5 (IL-5) and anti-IL-5 receptor α monoclonal antibodies markedly decrease airway and peripheral blood eosinophil numbers and are thus highly effective in reducing asthma exacerbations. Nonetheless, these biologics do not completely resolve exacerbations. There is very little information on the cellular nature of exacerbations during treatment with biologics. Using illustrative clinical case scenarios, we highlight the importance of carefully characterizing asthmatics at the time of exacerbation and recognizing neutrophilic causes of exacerbations to ensure optimal management. While an eosinophilic exacerbation may improve with more corticosteroids or by switching to another anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody, a noneosinophilic exacerbation will likely not. An infective exacerbation needs to be recognized, and the pathogen must be identified and treated with the appropriate antimicrobial agent.

SO029FIRST YEAR RENAL OUTCOME OF TRANSPLANTATIONS OF KIDNEYS FROM HEPATITIS C INFECTED DONORS TO HEPATITIS C NEGATIVE RECIPIENTS

Background and Aims

Transplant centers in US are increasingly willing to transplant kidneys from hepatitis C infected donors to hepatitis C negative recipients. Long-term renal outcome data from non-prophylactic treatment approach outside clinical trials is missing.

Method

We compared kidney graft function of 132 hepatitis C negative recipients, who received HCV infected (NAT+ and antibody+/-; HCV+) versus HCV negative (NAT- and antibody-; HCV-) in 2018, in a single center, retrospective, observational study. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests and continuous variables were compared using t-tests or Mann–Whitney U-tests, as appropriate. Linear regression was applied to assess independent association between graft function and HCV viremic status.

Results

The mean±SD age of recipients was 52±11 years, 44% were female, 20% and 79% of recipients were Caucasian and African-American, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between HCV+ vs HCV- groups, except dialysis duration, donors race, KDPI and cold ischemic time (Table). The DGF rate, estimated GFRs at post-transplant 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was similar between HCV+ and HCV- groups (Table). HCV viremic status was not a predictor of 3, 6, 9 and 12 months eGFR in our unadjusted model and after adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics.

Conclusion

Recipients of HCV-viremic kidneys have similar renal allograft function in the first year after transplantation compared to those who received from HCV-non-viremic kidneys.