Multidimensional Model of Energy in Patients With Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Evidence suggests that energy is a distinct symptom from fatigue in patients with cancer. The purpose of this paper is to present the Multidimensional Model of Energy in Patients with Cancer (MMEPC) that is based on emerging evidence and to make recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed to determine various factors associated with variations in energy in patients with cancer. In addition, some of the emerging evidence in the model is supported by studies of energy in the general population and in patients with other chronic conditions.

RESULTS

Based on a review of the literature, specific concepts in the MMEPC include: person factors, clinical factors, cancer-related factors, biological factors, factors associated with energy balance, and co-occurring symptoms. The evidence to support the association between each of these factors and variations in energy levels in patients with cancer is described and synthesized.

CONCLUSION

This article provides emerging evidence on factors that influence variations in energy levels in patients with cancer. While the fundamental biobehavioral and biologic mechanisms that underlie variations in energy levels are not well understood, the model can be used to design pre-clinical and clinical studies of energy in patients with cancer. In addition, while emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that fatigue and energy are distinct symptoms, additional research on common and distinct risk factors and underlying mechanisms is warranted to be able to develop and test precision interventions for one or both symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The risk factors (eg, being female, sleep quality) associated with variations in energy levels in patients with cancer identified in this paper have important clinical implications. Clinicians can use the identified risk factors to guide their assessments; identify high-risk patients with decrements in energy decrement; and develop targeted energy conservation interventions for the patients.

Common and distinct risk factors that influence more severe and distressing shortness of breath profiles in oncology outpatients

BACKGROUND

Shortness of breath occurs in 10%-70% of oncology patients. Very little is known about interindividual variability in its severity and distress and associated risk factors. Using latent profile analyses (LPAs), purpose was to identify subgroups of patients with distinct severity and distress profiles for shortness of breath as single symptom dimensions. In addition, a joint LPA was done using patients' severity AND distress ratings. For each of the three LPAs, differences among the shortness of breath classes in demographic, clinical, symptom, stress, and resilience characteristics were evaluated.

METHODS

Patients completed ratings of severity and distress from shortness of breath a total of six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were completed at enrollment (i.e., prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy). Separate LPAs were done using ratings of severity and distress, as well as a joint analysis using severity AND distress ratings. Differences among the latent classes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

For severity, two classes were identified (Slight to Moderate [91.6%] and Moderate to Severe [8.4%]). For distress, two classes were identified (A Little Bit to Somewhat [83.9%] and Somewhat to Quite a Bit [16.1%]). For the joint LPA, two classes were identified (Lower Severity and Distress [79.9%] and Higher Severity and Distress [20.1%]). While distinct risk factors were associated with each of the LPAs, across the three LPAs, the common risk factors associated with membership in the worse class included: a past or current history of smoking, poorer functional status, and higher comorbidity burden. In addition, these patients had a higher symptom burden and higher levels of cancer-specific stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can use the information provided in this study to identify high-risk patients and develop individualized interventions.

Systematic Review of the Literature on Multiple Co-occurring Symptoms in Patients Receiving Treatment for Gynecologic Cancers

OBJECTIVE

Patients with gynecologic cancers experience a very high symptom burden that has a negative impact on their quality of life. This systematic review aims to identify the common co-occurring symptoms, the prevalence of common symptoms, common instruments used to measure symptoms, associated risk factors, and the symptom burden in patients with gynecologic cancers.

DATA SOURCES

A search of four databases (ie, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL) was done from January 1, 2012, through September 5, 2022. A qualitative synthesis of the extant literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA 2020).

CONCLUSION

A total of 118 studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria. Ninety-six symptoms were assessed across these studies. The top six symptoms and their grand mean prevalence rates were lack of energy (64.4%), fatigue (62.1%), abdominal pain (53.3%), depression (52.6%), concentration dysfunction (52.0%), and drowsiness (51.9%). Numerous methodologic challenges were evident across studies. Future research needs to develop a disease-specific symptom assessment measure, evaluate for risk factors associated with a higher symptom burden, and determine the impact of multiple symptoms on patient outcomes.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The results are relevant for oncology clinicians to assess patients with gynecologic cancers for the presence of common symptoms and risk factors for higher symptom burden in the patients and to offer effective management interventions.

Distinct Co-occurring Morning and Evening Fatigue Profiles in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastrointestinal cancers experience diurnal variations in fatigue severity during chemotherapy that decrease their functional status and quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct co-occurring morning and evening fatigue profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic, clinical, stress, and symptom characteristics.

METHODS

Patients with gastrointestinal cancers (n = 405) completed questionnaires 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. The Lee Fatigue Scale was used to evaluate diurnal variations in fatigue severity. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct co-occurring morning AND evening fatigue profiles. Differences among the subgroups in demographic, clinical, stress, and symptom characteristics at enrollment were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric analyses.

RESULTS

Two classes were identified, namely: low morning and moderate evening fatigue (ie, Low-Moderate, 60.0%) and high morning and high evening fatigue (ie, Both High, 40.0%). Compared with the Low-Moderate class, the Both High class was significantly younger, female, unmarried, and unemployed and lacked regular exercise. In addition, they had childcare responsibilities, lower annual income, lower functional status, higher comorbidity burden, and self-reported anemia and depression. Patients in the Both High class reported higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, pain, and stress, and lower levels of energy and cognitive function.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide new insights into the risk factors for higher levels of co-occurring morning and evening fatigue in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians can use this information to identify high-risk patients and develop personalized symptom management interventions.

An Interactive Educational Tool to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Knowledge and Recommendation Among Nurses

In United States, only 57% of  women and 53% of men in the recommended age groups have received all recommended doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Healthcare provider education has been associated with strong vaccine recommendation and vaccination uptake. Our objective was to create a 7-min interactive online educational tool to improve knowledge and willingness to recommend the HPV vaccine among nurses. This is a prospective pre-test/post-test study to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational tool consisting of 10 flashcards in a question-answer format. Oncology nurses at our cancer center were invited to participate by email, which led them to the educational tool (i.e., intervention) along with pre- and post-test questions on HPV-associated cancers, vaccine-eligible age groups, dosing schedules, adverse events, and willingness to recommend. Of the 110 participants (mean age of 41.2 ± 11.4, 98% female, 64% >10 years of practice), there was improvement in knowledge after intervention in HPV-associated cancers (81% to 97%; p = 0.02), percentage of cervical caused by HPV (33% to 64%; p < 0.05), and dosing schedule (47% to 93%; p < 0.05). All participants correctly stated that continued screening is needed after vaccination both pre- and post-intervention. Eighty-five percent strongly agreed that the intervention improved their HPV knowledge, and 77% stated they were more likely to recommend the HPV vaccine after the intervention. While nurses are willing to recommend the vaccine, there remains persistent knowledge gaps. A brief 7-min self-administered online interactive flashcard educational intervention is effective in improving the HPV vaccine knowledge among nurses.

Anxiety in oncology outpatients is associated with perturbations in pathways identified in anxiety focused network pharmacology research

PURPOSE

Evaluate for perturbed signaling pathways associated with subgroups of patients with low versus high levels of state anxiety. These pathways were compared to the pathways identified across eight network pharmacology studies of the anxiolytic effect(s) of a variety of compounds.

METHODS

Adult outpatients had a diagnosis of breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer; had received chemotherapy within the preceding four weeks; and were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct anxiety profiles based on Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory scores that were obtained six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Blood samples were processed using RNA sequencing (i.e., RNA-seq sample, n = 244) and microarray (i.e., microarray sample; n = 256) technologies. Pathway perturbations were assessed using pathway impact analysis. Fisher's combined probability method was used to combine test results using a false discovery rate of 0.01.

RESULTS

In the RNA-seq sample, 62.3% and 37.7% of the patients were in the low- and high-anxiety classes, respectively. In the microarray sample, 61.3% and 38.7% were in the low and high-anxiety classes, respectively. Forty-one perturbed signaling pathways were identified. Eight of these pathways were common to those identified in the network pharmacology studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings increase our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that underlie anxiety in patients receiving chemotherapy. This study provides initial insights into how anxiety in patients with cancer may share common mechanisms with anxiety in patients with other clinical conditions.

Dispensary personnel's views and experiences regarding oncologic cannabis and the counsel they offer adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

A minority of oncologists feel qualified to advise adults with cancer on issues pertaining to medicinal cannabis. Adults with cancer frequently access medicinal cannabis information from non-medical sources such as cannabis dispensaries. We explored dispensary personnel's views and experiences regarding oncologic cannabis and the counsel they extend individuals with cancer.

METHODS

Snowball sampling in this qualitative study facilitated recruitment across 13 states (N = 26). Semi-structured phone interviews ceased with thematic saturation. A multi-stage thematic analysis combined inductive and deductive codes.

RESULTS

Of the 26 dispensary personnel interviewed, 54% identified as female and 19% as non-white. Median age was 40 years. A consensus emerged among participants concerning the botanical's efficacy for cancer-related symptoms; less so regarding its antineoplastic potential. Principles for serving those with cancer included provision of client-centered, symptom-based, and trial-and-error approaches. Non-inhalation modes of administration were generally recommended. No consensus was reached as to whether delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinal (THC)- or cannabidiol-predominant products were preferable in this population. Challenges in oncologic advising included successfully identifying individuals with cancer at the dispensary counter, financial toxicity, the special treatment required for the THC-naïve, and operating in the absence of standardized guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

These informed assertions suggest that members of the oncologic community should grapple with the extent to which they feel comfortable with both the nature and degree of counsel adults with cancer receive through dispensaries.

Higher Lifetime Stress and Symptom Burden Contribute to the Occurrence of Shortness of Breath

OBJECTIVES

Among four classes of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles, evaluate for differences in levels of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as resilience; evaluate for differences in the occurrence rates for various stressful life events, and evaluate for differences in the severity of common co-occurring symptoms.

DATA SOURCES

Outpatients (N = 1338) completed questionnaires six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. The occurrence of shortness of breath was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles. Differences among the classes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

CONCLUSION

Shortness of breath classes were labeled based on their distinct occurrence trajectories: None (70.5%), Decreasing (8.2%), Increasing (7.8%), and High (13.5%). Compared to None class, Decreasing and High classes had higher global and cancer-specific stress scores. The High class reported higher occurrence rates for several adverse childhood experiences. Compared to None class, Decreasing and High classes had higher depression, anxiety, and morning fatigue scores and lower morning energy and cognitive function scores.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Given the additive or synergistic relationships between stress, co-occurring symptoms, and shortness of breath, multimodal interventions that include stress management, exercise training, and/or symptom management may decrease shortness of breath in oncology patients.

Abstract 742: Trial in progress: Comprehensive outcomes for after cancer health (COACH), a randomized trial assessing health outcomes following primary cancer therapy

Purpose: This study evaluates feasibility and acceptability of a digital health coaching intervention for individuals who are within one year of completing primary cancer treatment of any modality, as well as its effect on health self-efficacy. Secondary endpoints evaluate trends in patient-reported outcomes (PRO), including financial toxicity, for which the Economic StraiN and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) tool is being validated. Additional endpoints explore associations between patient-reported symptoms, wearable, biomarker, and clinical data. This study seeks to fill a critical knowledge gap as to how health behavioral changes prompted by health coaching may modulate symptoms and physical/psychosocial well-being through the longitudinal tracking of patient reported, clinical, and bioinformatic data.

Methods: This randomized, wait-list control trial is being conducted at geographically diverse National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Per site enrollment is &lt;150 participants, aged 18 and older, following completion of primary treatment for breast, ovarian, endometrial, lung, or gastric cancer or population specific (eg, ≥65 years) cohorts. A 6-month coaching intervention utilizing phone calls coupled with supplemental digital content via text, email, or web-based application is delivered during months 1 through 6 (intervention) or months 7 through 12 (wait-list control). PROMIS and other validated questionnaires and activity data are collected over 12 months. Gut microbiome specimens and the Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) III are collected at enrollment and 6 months. Feasibility (retention rate ≥70%) and acceptability (≤20% scoring “not at all helpful”), are assessed with descriptive statistics.

Summary Data: To date, 47 individuals have been enrolled at 3 study sites, Nebraska Medicine (36), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (10), and The Ohio State University James Cancer Center (1). This includes 1 male and 46 female participants, with an average age of 63.62 (R 33-75), of whom 44 identify as White and 3 as Black or African American, and 47 identify as non-Hispanic. Among participants, 35 have a history of breast, 10 ovarian, 1 endometrial, and 1 gastric cancer. Two additional sites are planned to begin enrollment in 2023, one of which will primarily enroll participants identifying as Black and/or Hispanic.

Conclusions: Enrollment is anticipated to complete by December 2023 with site-specific and composite results reported by December 2024. Novel outcomes related to the use of digital health coaching in the context of survivorship, as well as robust data assessing clinical, microbiome, dietary, patient-reported, and wearable data is expected to enhance existing evidence regarding outcomes in patients on both active surveillance and maintenance therapies for diverse tumor types.

Citation Format: Kelly J. Brassil, Alexi Wright, Elizabeth Arthur, Austin Barr, Laura Flora, Barbara Halpenny, Mariah K. Jackson, Jessica Krok-Schoen, Robin Lally, Jennifer Loftis, Debra Lynch Kelly, Leorey Saligan, Rachael Schmidt, Grace L. Smith, Angela Starkweather, Anna Tavormina, Gisele Tlusty, Michael Vazquez, Marilyn Hammer. Trial in progress: Comprehensive outcomes for after cancer health (COACH), a randomized trial assessing health outcomes following primary cancer therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 742.

Higher Stress in Oncology Patients is Associated With Cognitive and Evening Physical Fatigue Severity

CONTEXT

Cognitive and physical fatigue are common symptoms experienced by oncology patients. Exposure to stressful life events (SLE), cancer-related stressors, coping styles, and levels of resilience may influence the severity of both dimensions of fatigue.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate for differences in global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, as well as resilience and coping in oncology patients (n=1332) with distinct cognitive fatigue AND evening physical fatigue profiles.

METHODS

Latent profile analysis, which combined the two symptom scores, identified three subgroups of patients with distinct cognitive fatigue AND evening physical fatigue profiles (i.e., Low, Moderate, High). Patients completed measures of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress as well measures of resilience and coping. Differences among the latent classes in the various measures were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Compared to Low class, the other two classes reported higher global and cancer-specific stress. In addition, they reported higher occurrence rates for sexual harassment and being forced to touch prior to 16 years of age. Compared to the other two classes, High class reported lower resilience scores and higher use of denial, substance use, and behavioral disengagement.

CONCLUSION

To decrease both cognitive and evening physical fatigue, clinicians need to assess for relevant stressors and initiate interventions to increase resilience and the use of engagement coping strategies. Additional research is warranted on the relative contribution of various social determinants of health to both cognitive and physical fatigue in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy.

Abstract OT2-06-01: Breast Cancer Cohort of the Comprehensive Outcomes for After Cancer Health (COACH) Study: Study Protocol

Background: Women with breast cancer account for the largest cohort (23%) of over 18 million cancer survivors in the United States. Of the nearly 4 million breast cancer survivors, many, including individuals with metastatic breast cancer, will require lifelong treatment for chronic conditions. As part of a multi-site study including diverse tumor types, breast cancer survivors are being recruited to explore the feasibility and outcomes of a digital health coaching (DHC) program following the completion of primary therapy to support self-management of symptoms and general wellness. Trial design: A randomized-wait list control design will evaluate outcomes related to engagement in a DHC program following completion of primary therapy. Participants will be enrolled in a 6-month DHC program delivering evidence-based content via weekly calls, text, and email, in addition to usual support from their respective healthcare teams. The intervention group will receive coaching upon enrollment. The control group will receive coaching after a 6-month monitoring period. Twelve months of longitudinal clinical, patient-reported outcomes, activity tracking (via Fitbit), and microbiome data will be collected from both groups. Eligibility criteria: The breast cancer cohort will consist of individuals with both localized and metastatic disease within 1 year of completion of primary therapy, defined as treatment of curative intent, first-line or later, from which the individual is advancing to active surveillance or follow-up, with or without maintenance therapy. All study participants must be &gt;18 years old, able to read and speak English, have access to mobile technology, and agree to wear and have data collected from an activity tracker. Specific aims: 1) Assess the feasibility and acceptability of a DHC program and its effect on participant health self-efficacy; 2) characterize associations between participant symptoms, physical/psychosocial well-being, and health self-management and gut microbiota changes; and 3) explore patient-generated health data outcomes among participants (patient reported and wearable biometrics outcomes). Statistical methods: Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through descriptive statistics. Feasibility for this study is defined as a retention rate ≥70%, and acceptability is defined as ≤20% scoring “not at all helpful.” Secondary aims will be assessed using linear mixed models. Cross-cohort analysis of physical function, measured by the PROMIS Physical Function 10a, will be conducted. Assuming a power of 0.8 and significance level of .05, we will be able to detect a 2.51 difference in PROMIS score means between the control and intervention group (SD 10) with a sample of 500 total participants. Sub-group analysis will be conducted with the anticipated 250 participants in the breast cancer cohort with a focus on feasibility, acceptability, and descriptive and exploratory endpoints for this population as a whole and comparing early stage and metastatic participants. Target and present accruals: 500 individuals with diverse tumor types will be enrolled across 5 collaborating sites, of which 4 ill include individuals with breast cancer. An estimated 250 breast cancer participants (approximately 50% of the total study population), including 150 with de novo or progressive metastatic breast cancer, are planned to be recruited. To date, 1 Midwestern site has enrolled the first 7 breast cancer survivors. Two additional sites plan to enroll in July 2022, with the remaining 2 sites to begin enrollment by the end of 2022.

Citation Format: Robin M. Lally, Rachael L. Schmidt, Gisele Tlusty, Elizabeth K. Arthur, Laura K. Flora, Jessica L. Krok-Schoen, Jessica T. Jones, Meagan Whisenant, Abbey Kaler, Debu Tripathy, Leorey Saligan, Marilyn Hammer, Austin Barr, Lindsey Jackson, Jennifer Loftis, Kelly J. Brassil. Breast Cancer Cohort of the Comprehensive Outcomes for After Cancer Health (COACH) Study: Study Protocol [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-06-01.

Distinct Nausea Profiles Are Associated With Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Unrelieved chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) occurs 48% of patients undergoing chemotherapy and is one of the most debilitating symptoms that patients report.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles and determine how these subgroups differed on demographic and clinical characteristics; severity, frequency, and distress of CIN; and the co-occurrence of common gastrointestinal symptoms.

METHODS

Patients (n = 1343) completed demographic questionnaire and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles. Differences among these subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

Four distinct CIN profiles were identified: none (40.8%), increasing-decreasing (21.5%), decreasing (8.9%), and high (28.8%). Compared with the none class, patients in the high class were younger, had a lower annual household income, had child care responsibilities, had a lower Karnofsky Performance Status score and a higher Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire score, and were more likely to have received chemotherapy on a 14-day cycle and a highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimen. In addition, patients in the high class reported high occurrence rates for dry mouth, feeling bloated, diarrhea, lack of appetite, abdominal cramps, difficulty swallowing, mouth sores, weight loss, and change in the way food tastes.

CONCLUSIONS

That 60% of the patients reported moderate to high CIN occurrence rates confirms that this unrelieved symptom is a significant clinical problem.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses need to evaluate patients' level of adherence to their antiemetic regimen and make appropriate referrals for physical therapy, psychological services, and dietary counseling.

Distinct Shortness of Breath Profiles in Oncology Outpatients Undergoing Chemotherapy

CONTEXT

Shortness of breath is a distressing symptom that occurs in 10% to 70% of oncology patients. Despite this broad range in its occurrence, little is known about inter-individual variability in shortness of breath and associated risk factors among patients receiving chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

Identify subgroups of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles; evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics; evaluate for differences among symptom dimensions of shortness of breath, and evaluate for differences in quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

Outpatients (n=1338) completed questionnaires six times over two chemotherapy cycles. Occurrence of shortness of breath was assessed using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct shortness of breath profiles.

RESULTS

Four distinct shortness of breath profiles were identified (None [70.5%], Decreasing [8.2%], Increasing [7.8%], High [13.5%]). Risk factors for membership in High class included: history of smoking, self-reported diagnosis of lung disease, having lung cancer, and receipt of a higher number of cancer treatments. Compared to the None class, High class reported poorer physical, psychological, and social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 14% of patients with heterogeneous types of cancer receiving chemotherapy had persistently high occurrence rates of shortness of breath for almost two months. In addition, compared to the Decreasing and Increasing classes, the High class' episodes of shortness of breath were more frequent and more severe. Clinicians need to assess all oncology patients for shortness of breath and provide targeted interventions.

Associations Between Demographic, Clinical, and Symptom Characteristics and Stress in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing cancer treatment experience global stress and cancer-specific stress. Both types of stress are associated with a higher symptom burden.

OBJECTIVE

In this cross-sectional study, we used a comprehensive set of demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics to evaluate their relative contribution to the severity of global and cancer-specific stress.

METHODS

Patients (N = 941) completed study questionnaires before their second or third cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Consistent with our a priori hypothesis, we found both common and distinct characteristics associated with higher levels of global stress and cancer-specific stress. A significant proportion of our patients had scores on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised suggestive of subsyndromal (29.4%) or probable (13.9%) posttraumatic stress disorder. Four of the 5 stepwise linear regression analyses for the various stress scales explained between 41.6% and 54.5% of the total variance. Compared with various demographic and clinical characteristics, many of the common symptoms associated with cancer and its treatments uniquely explained a higher percentage of the variance in the various stress scales. Symptoms of depression made the largest unique contribution to the percentage of total explained variance across all 5 scales.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians need to assess for global stress, cancer-specific stress, and depression in patients receiving chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Patients may benefit from integrative interventions (eg, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture) that simultaneously address stress and symptoms commonly associated with cancer and its treatments.

Perturbations in Neuroinflammatory Pathways Are Associated With a Worst Pain Profile in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Unrelieved pain occurs in 55% of cancer patients. Identification of molecular mechanisms for pain may provide insights into therapeutic targets. Purpose was to evaluate for perturbations in neuroinflammatory pathways between oncology patients with and without severe pain. Worst pain severity was rated using a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct pain profiles. Pathway impact analyses were performed in two independent samples using gene expression data obtained from RNA sequencing (n = 192) and microarray (n = 197) technologies. Fisher's combined probability test was used to identify significantly perturbed pathways between None versus the Severe pain classes. In the RNA sequencing and microarray samples, 62.5% and 56.3% of patients were in the Severe pain class, respectively. Nine perturbed pathways were related to neuroinflammatory mechanisms (i.e., retrograde endocannabinoid signaling, gamma-aminobutyric acid synapse, glutamatergic synapse, Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling, phagosome, complement and coagulation cascades, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, chemokine signaling, calcium signaling). First study to identify perturbations in neuroinflammatory pathways associated with severe pain in oncology outpatients. Findings suggest that complex neuroimmune interactions are involved in the maintenance of chronic pain conditions. Perspective: In this study that compared oncology patients with none versus severe pain, nine perturbed neuroinflammatory pathways were identified. Findings suggest that complex neuroimmune interactions are involved in the maintenance of persistent pain conditions.

Advances in Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Symptom Cluster Research: A 20-Year Perspective

Two conceptual approaches are used to evaluate symptom clusters: "clustering" symptoms (ie, variable-centered analytic approach) and "clustering" patients (ie, person-centered analytic approach). However, these methods are not used consistently and conceptual clarity is needed. Given the emergence of novel methods to evaluate symptom clusters, a review of the conceptual basis for older and newer analytic methods is warranted. Therefore, this article will review the conceptual basis for symptom cluster research; compare and contrast the conceptual basis for using variable-centered versus patient-centered analytic approaches in symptom cluster research; review their strengths and weaknesses; and compare their applications in symptom cluster research.

Higher stress and symptom severity are associated with worse depressive symptom profiles in patients receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

In a sample of oncology patients, identify subgroups of patients with distinct depressive symptom profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, levels of stress and resilience, and the severity of common co-occurring symptoms.

METHODS

Patients (n = 1327) had a diagnosis of breast, gastrointestinal, gynecological, or lung cancer; had received chemotherapy within the preceding four weeks; and were scheduled to receive at least two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics, stress, resilience, and co-occurring symptoms were evaluated at enrollment. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale a total of six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups of patients (i.e., latent classes) with distinct depressive symptom profiles using the six CES-D scores.

RESULTS

Based on the findings from the LPA, 47.3% of the patients were classified as "None"; 33.6% as "Subsyndromal"; 13.8% as "Moderate"; and 5.3% as "High". Compared to None class, patients in the Subsyndromal, Moderate, and High classes had a lower functional status, a higher comorbidity burden, and a self-reported diagnosis of depression or back pain. Those patients with higher levels of depressive symptoms reported higher levels of stress, lower levels of resilience, and increased severity of co-occurring symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Inter-individual variability in depressive symptoms was associated with demographic and clinical characteristics, multiple types of stress and levels of resilience, as well as with the increased severity of multiple co-occurring symptoms. The risk factors associated with worse depressive symptom profiles can assist clinicians to identify high risk patients and initiate more timely supportive care interventions.

Symptom clusters in patients receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Since 2001, symptom cluster research has grown considerably. However, because multiple methodological considerations remain, ongoing synthesis of the literature is needed to identify gaps in this area of symptom science. This systematic review evaluated the progress in symptom clusters research in adults receiving primary or adjuvant chemotherapy since 2016.

METHODS

Eligible studies were published in English between 1 January 2017 and 17 May 2021; evaluated for and identified symptom clusters 'de novo;' and included only adults being treated with primary or adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies were excluded if patients had advanced cancer or were receiving palliative chemotherapy; symptoms were measured after treatment; symptom clusters were pre-specified or a patient-centred analytic approach was used. For each study, symptom instrument(s); statistical methods and symptom dimension(s) used to create the clusters; whether symptoms were allowed to load on more than one factor; method used to assess for stability of symptom clusters and associations with secondary outcomes and biomarkers were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was the most common instrument and exploratory factor analysis was the most common statistical method used to identify symptom clusters. Psychological, gastrointestinal, and nutritional clusters were the most commonly identified clusters. Only the psychological cluster remained relatively stable over time. Only five studies evaluated for secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

While symptom cluster research has evolved, clear criteria to evaluate the stability of symptom clusters and standardised nomenclature for naming clusters are needed. Additional research is needed to evaluate the biological mechanism(s) for symptom clusters.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021240216.

Glycemic Variability Within 1 Year Following Surgery for Stage II-III Colon Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine glycemic variability within 1 month and 1 year following surgery among adult patients, with and without Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), treated for stage II-III colon cancer.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of electronic health record data was conducted. Glycemic variability (i.e., standard deviation [SD] and coefficient of variation [CV] of > 2 blood glucose measures) was assessed within 1 month and within 1 year following colon surgery. Chi-square (χ²), Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

Among the sample of 165 patients with stage II-III colon cancer, those with T2D had higher glycemic variability compared to patients without T2D (p < .001), with values within 1 month following surgery (SD = 44.69 mg/dL, CV = 27.4%) vs (SD = 20.55 mg/dL, CV = 17.53%); and within 1 year following surgery (SD = 45.04 mg/dL, CV = 29.04%) vs (SD = 21.36 mg/dL, CV = 18.6%). Associations were found between lower body mass index and higher glycemic variability (i.e., SD [r = -.413, p < .05] and CV [r = -.481, p < .01]) within 1 month following surgery in patients with T2D. Higher preoperative glucose was associated with higher glycemic variability (i.e., SD r = .448, p < .01) within 1 year in patients with T2D. Demographic and clinical characteristics were weakly associated with glycemic variability in patients without T2D.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage II-III colon cancer with T2D experienced higher glycemic variability within 1 month and within 1 year following surgery compared to those without T2D. Associations between glycemic variability and demographic and clinical characteristics differed by T2D status. Further research in prospective studies is warranted.

Determination of Cutpoints for Symptom Burden in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

CONTEXT

Cutpoints can be used as a threshold for screening symptom(s) that warrant intervention(s) and for monitoring patients' responses to these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

In a sample of oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy, study purposes were to determine the optimal cutpoints for low, moderate, and high symptom burden and determine if these cutpoints distinguished among the symptom groups in any demographic, clinical, and stress characteristics, as well as QOL outcomes.

METHODS

Total of 1329 patients completed a modified version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (38 symptoms). Using the methodology of Serlin and colleagues, cutpoints were created using symptom occurrence rates and cancer-specific quality of life (QOL) scores. Cutpoints were validated using measures of stress and resilience and a generic measure of QOL (i.e., Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12 (SF-12)).

RESULTS

Of the 25 possible cutpoints evaluated, the optimal cutpoint, with the largest between category F statistic, was CP8,15 (Low = 0-8, Moderate = 9-15, High = 16-38 symptoms). Percentage of patients in the Low, Moderate, and High cutpoint groups were 25.3%, 36.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. Significant differences were found among the symptom burden groups in global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress (i.e., Low < Moderate < High) and resilience and SF-12 (i.e., Low > Moderate > High) scores.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide evidence for clinically meaningful cutpoints that can be used to guide symptom assessment and management. These cutpoints may be used to establish alert thresholds for electronic monitoring of symptoms in oncology patients.

Worst Pain Severity Profiles of Oncology Patients Are Associated With Significant Stress and Multiple Co-Occurring Symptoms

Little is known about the associations between pain, stress, and co-occurring symptoms in oncology patients. Purpose was to identify subgroups of patients with distinct worst pain profiles and evaluate for differences among the subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as stress and symptom scores. Oncology outpatients (n = 1305) completed questionnaires prior to their second or third chemotherapy cycle. Worst pain intensity was assessed 6 times over 2 chemotherapy cycles using a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale. The 371 patients (28.4%) who had ≤1 occurrence of pain over the 6 assessments were classified as the None class. For the remaining 934 patients whose data were entered into the latent profile analysis, 3 distinct worst pain profiles were identified (ie Mild [12.5%], Moderate [28.6%], Severe [30.5%]). Compared to None class, Severe class had fewer years of education and a lower annual income; were less likely to be employed and married; less likely to exercise on a regular basis, had a higher comorbidity burden, and a worse functional status. Compared to None class, Severe class reported higher levels of general, disease-specific, and cumulative life stress and lower levels of resilience, as well as higher levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction. This study is the first to identify distinct worst pain profiles in a large sample of oncology patients receiving chemotherapy and associated risk factors. PERSPECTIVE: Unrelieved pain remains a significant problem for oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. High levels of stress and co-occurring symptoms contribute to a more severe pain profile in these patients.

Cancer-related cognitive impairment is associated with perturbations in inflammatory pathways

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant problem for patients receiving chemotherapy. While a growing amount of pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests that inflammatory mechanisms underlie CRCI, no clinical studies have evaluated for associations between CRCI and changes in gene expression. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate for differentially expressed genes and perturbed inflammatory pathways across two independent samples of patients with cancer who did and did not report CRCI. The Attentional Function Index (AFI) was the self-report measure used to assess CRCI. AFI scores of <5 and of >7.5 indicate low versus high levels of cognitive function, respectively. Of the 185 patients in Sample 1, 49.2% had an AFI score of <5 and 50.8% had an AFI score of >7.5. Of the 158 patients in Sample 2, 50.6% had an AFI score of <5 and 49.4% had an AFI score of >7.5. Data from 182 patients in Sample 1 were analyzed using RNA-seq. Data from 158 patients in Sample 2 were analyzed using microarray. Twelve KEGG signaling pathways were significantly perturbed between the AFI groups, five of which were signaling pathways related to inflammatory mechanisms (e.g., cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, tumor necrosis factor signaling). This study is the first to describe perturbations in inflammatory pathways associated with CRCI. Findings highlight the role of cytokines both in terms of cytokine-specific pathways, as well as pathways involved in cytokine production and cytokine activation. These findings have the potential to identify new targets for therapeutics and lead to the development of interventions to improve cognition in patients with cancer.

Anxiety profiles are associated with stress, resilience and symptom severity in outpatients receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study, in a sample of oncology patients (n = 1326) receiving chemotherapy, were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct anxiety profiles and evaluate for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, stress and resilience measures, and severity of co-occurring symptoms (i.e., depression, sleep disturbance, attentional function, fatigue, pain).

METHODS

Patients completed self-report questionnaires a total of six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Severity of state anxiety was evaluated using the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory and resilience was assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Sleep Disturbance Scale, Lee Fatigue Scale, Attentional Function Index and Brief Pain Inventory.

RESULTS

Based on the findings from the latent profile analysis that utilized the six assessments of state anxiety, 47.7% of the patients were classified as "Low," 28.3% as "Moderate," 19.5% as "High," and 4.5.% as "Very High." Anxiety levels remained relatively stable across the six timepoints. Compared to the Low class, membership in the Moderate, High, and Very High classes was associated with a number of characteristics (e.g., younger age, female gender, lower functional status, more comorbidities). Those patients with higher levels of anxiety reported higher levels of stress, lower levels of resilience, and increased severity of co-occurring symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that a substantial number of oncology patients may warrant referral to psychological services. Clinicians need to perform systematic assessments of anxiety, stress, and common symptoms and initiate appropriate interventions to enhance resilience and coping.

Inverted V-shaped extracapsular stabilisation technique and arthroscopic findings in six dogs with medial shoulder instability

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this case series was to report arthroscopic findings and to evaluate clinical outcomes of dogs treated with an inverted V-shaped extracapsular stabilisation technique without additional external coaptation for medial shoulder instability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of dogs with medial shoulder instability that underwent arthroscopy and an inverted V-shaped extracapsular stabilisation technique were retrospectively reviewed. Extracapsular stabilisation was performed in all dogs using screws and spiked washers as anchor points for the coated polyester prosthetic ligament. No additional external coaptation was used in any dog. A minimum 18-month follow-up period was required for study inclusion. Complications and long-term outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The subscapularis tendon and medial glenohumeral ligament were the structures most commonly affected. All dogs had pathological cartilage fibrillations. Implants were successfully placed in all dogs. Implant loosening was recorded in two out of six dogs on recheck but no revision surgery was performed. Function at the time of last clinical follow-up (median, 28 months, range 18 to 33 months) was full in four out of six and acceptable in two out of six dogs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Surgical treatment of medial shoulder instability using the novel inverted V-shaped extracapsular stabilisation technique was successful. Potential complications such as implant loosening may occur. Despite the limited number of cases, the present study suggests that additional postoperative external coaptation may not be necessary for successful management of dogs with medial shoulder instability.