JAK/STAT signaling in rheumatoid arthritis leukocytes is uncoupled from serum cytokines in a subset of patients

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease involving pro-inflammatory cytokines that can be therapeutically targeted by antibodies or kinase inhibitors. Nevertheless, these drugs fail in a subset of patients independent of the abundance of the targeted cytokines. We aim to explore the cellular basis of this phenomenon by analyzing the relation of cytokine abundance and activation of downstream signaling pathways in RA.

METHODS

The study included 62 RA patients and 9 healthy controls (HC). Phosphorylation of STAT 1-6 in various immune cell subsets was determined ex vivo using a novel robust flow cytometry-based protocol. Serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17 A, interferon gamma, and TNFα in the same samples were measured using highly sensitive single molecule array (SIMOA).

RESULTS

We found an increase in circulating cytokines in RA patients, while STAT activity was lower in RA patients compared to HC. Based on STAT activity we determined three endotypes in active RA patients (cDAI>10, n = 28): 1) those with active STAT5a/b signaling in T cells (n = 7/28), 2) those with a low STAT activity in all assessed cell types (n = 14/28), and 3) those with active STAT1 and STAT3 signaling mainly in myeloid cells (n = 7/28). Integrating intracellular STAT activation and cytokine analysis revealed diminished JAK/STAT signaling in a subset of patients (n = 8/20) despite elevated serum cytokine concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Diminished JAK/STAT signaling in active RA may partly explain unresponsiveness to therapy targeting cytokine signaling. Analysis of JAK/STAT phosphorylation may identify patients at risk for non-response to these therapies.

Cranial involvement in giant cell arteritis

Since its first clinical description in 1890, extensive research has advanced our understanding of giant cell arteritis, leading to improvements in both diagnosis and management for affected patients. Imaging studies have shown that the disease frequently extends beyond the typical cranial arteries, also affecting large vessels such as the aorta and its proximal branches. Meanwhile, advances in comprehending the underlying pathophysiology of giant cell arteritis have given rise to numerous potential therapeutic agents, which aim to minimise the need for glucocorticoid treatment and prevent flares. Classification criteria for giant cell arteritis, as well as recommendations for management, imaging, and treat-to-target have been developed or updated in the last 5 years, and current research encompasses a broad spectrum covering basic, translational, and clinical research. In this Series paper, we aim to discuss the current understanding of giant cell arteritis with cranial manifestations, describe the clinical approach to this condition, and explore future directions in research and patient care.

EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging modalities in primary large vessel vasculitis (LVV).

METHODS

A systematic literature review update was performed to retrieve new evidence on ultrasound, MRI, CT and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction in LVV. The task force consisted of 24 physicians, health professionals and patients from 14 countries. The recommendations were updated based on evidence and expert opinion, iterating until voting indicated consensus. The level of agreement was determined by anonymous votes.

RESULTS

Three overarching principles and eight recommendations were agreed. Compared to the 2018 version, ultrasound is now recommended as first-line imaging test in all patients with suspected giant cell arteritis, and axillary arteries should be included in the standard examination. As an alternative to ultrasound, cranial and extracranial arteries can be examined by FDG-PET or MRI. For Takayasu arteritis, MRI is the preferred imaging modality; FDG-PET, CT or ultrasound are alternatives. Although imaging is not routinely recommended for follow-up, ultrasound, FDG-PET or MRI may be used for assessing vessel abnormalities in LVV patients with suspected relapse, particularly when laboratory markers of inflammation are unreliable. MR-angiography, CT-angiography or ultrasound may be used for long-term monitoring of structural damage, particularly at sites of preceding vascular inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2023 EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance for the role of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with LVV.

The association between comorbidities and disease activity in spondyloarthritis - A narrative review

Comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and depression, are more prevalent in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) than in the general population. Clinical and laboratory markers of disease activity are associated with numerous of these comorbidities, and studies suggest that the treatment of SpA can have a positive impact on comorbidities; conversely, managing comorbidities can improve disease activity. Therefore, the screening of comorbidities is considered a core component of a rheumatology consultation, and treatment should be performed in liaison with other health professionals (e.g. general physicians). Validated tools and questionnaires can be used for not only the detection but also the monitoring of potential comorbidities. Understanding whether a comorbidity is a separate disease entity, linked to SpA or its treatment, or an extra-musculoskeletal manifestation of the disease is important to identify the most appropriate treatment options.

Imaging in diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To update the evidence on imaging for diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction in large vessel vasculitis (LVV) to inform the 2023 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations on imaging in LVV.

METHODS

Systematic literature review (SLR) (2017-2022) including prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies (>20 participants) on diagnostic, monitoring, outcome prediction and technical aspects of LVV imaging. Diagnostic accuracy data were meta-analysed in combination with data from an earlier (2017) SLR.

RESULTS

The update retrieved 38 studies, giving a total of 81 studies when combined with the 2017 SLR. For giant cell arteritis (GCA), and taking clinical diagnosis as a reference standard, low risk of bias (RoB) studies yielded pooled sensitivities and specificities (95% CI) of 88% (82% to 92%) and 96% (95% CI 86% to 99%) for ultrasound (n=8 studies), 81% (95% CI 71% to 89%) and 98% (95% CI 89% to 100%) for MRI (n=3) and 76% (95% CI 67% to 83%) and 95% (95% CI 71% to 99%) for fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET, n=4), respectively. Compared with studies assessing cranial arteries only, low RoB studies with ultrasound assessing both cranial and extracranial arteries revealed a higher sensitivity (93% (95% CI 88% to 96%) vs 80% (95% CI 71% to 87%)) with comparable specificity (94% (95% CI 83% to 98%) vs 97% (95% CI 71% to 100%)). No new studies on diagnostic imaging for Takayasu arteritis (TAK) were found. Some monitoring studies in GCA or TAK reported associations of imaging with clinical signs of inflammation. No evidence was found to determine whether imaging severity might predict worse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound, MRI and FDG-PET revealed a good performance for the diagnosis of GCA. Cranial and extracranial vascular ultrasound had a higher pooled sensitivity with similar specificity compared with limited cranial ultrasound.

The provisional OMERACT ultrasonography score for giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVES

To develop an Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasonography score for monitoring disease activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and evaluate its metric properties.

METHODS

The OMERACT Instrument Selection Algorithm was followed. Forty-nine members of the OMERACT ultrasonography large vessel vasculitis working group were invited to seven Delphi rounds. An online reliability exercise was conducted using images of bilateral common temporal arteries, parietal and frontal branches as well as axillary arteries from 16 patients with GCA and 7 controls. Sensitivity to change and convergent construct validity were tested using data from a prospective cohort of patients with new GCA in which ultrasound-based intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements were conducted at weeks 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24.

RESULTS

Agreement was obtained (92.7%) for the OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS), calculated as follows: sum of IMT measured in every segment divided by the rounded cut-off values of IMTs in each segment. The resulting value is then divided by the number of segments available. Thirty-five members conducted the reliability exercise, the interrater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the OGUS was 0.72-0.84 and the median intrareader ICC was 0.91. The prospective cohort consisted of 52 patients. Sensitivity to change between baseline and each follow-up visit up to week 24 yielded standardised mean differences from -1.19 to -2.16, corresponding to large and very large magnitudes of change, respectively. OGUS correlated moderately with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (corrcoeff 0.37-0.48).

CONCLUSION

We developed a provisional OGUS for potential use in clinical trials.

EULAR points to consider for the use of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based Points to Consider (PtC) for the use of imaging modalities to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

METHODS

European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) standardised operating procedures were followed. A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve data on the role of imaging modalities including ultrasound (US), fluoroscopy, MRI, CT and fusion imaging to guide interventional procedures. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the task force (25 participants consisting of physicians, healthcare professionals and patients from 11 countries) developed PtC, with consensus obtained through voting. The final level of agreement was provided anonymously.

RESULTS

A total of three overarching principles and six specific PtC were formulated. The task force recommends preference of imaging over palpation to guide targeted interventional procedures at peripheral joints, periarticular musculoskeletal structures, nerves and the spine. While US is the favoured imaging technique for peripheral joints and nerves, the choice of the imaging method for the spine and sacroiliac joints has to be individualised according to the target, procedure, expertise, availability and radiation exposure. All imaging guided interventions should be performed by a trained specialist using appropriate operational procedures, settings and assistance by technical personnel.

CONCLUSION

These are the first EULAR PtC to provide guidance on the role of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with RMDs.

POS1063 STAT PHOSPHORYLATION AS A MARKER FOR DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: AN EXPLORATIVE ANALYSIS

Background

Numerous cytokines that influence disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are modulators of the Janus Kinases/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway. The JAK1/STAT1/STAT3/STAT5 network can drive the expansion of Th17 and regulatory T cells via proinflammatory cytokines in PsA joints,[1], [2] while hyperphosphorylation of STAT3 in immune cells has previously been shown to promote PsA pathogenesis through the Interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17/IL-22 axis.[3] Therefore, the phosphorylation status of STAT molecules in leucocytes of PsA patients may indicate active disease and could potentially guide treatment with JAK inhibitors.

Objectives

To analyse phosphorylated STAT (pSTAT) levels of circulating leucocyte subsets in PsA patients with active and inactive disease

Methods

Whole blood was drawn on consecutive PsA patients fulfilling the CASPAR criteria[4] to perform flow cytometry analysis using the BD FACSLyric platform. Disease activity was assessed using the Disease activity for psoriasis arthritis (DAPSA) score.[5] All steps from storage of drawn blood to cell fixation were performed at 4°C to prevent auto-activation of leucocytes. The geometric mean fluorescence intensities (gMFI) of pSTATs in granulocytes, monocytes, B cells and CD4+/- naïve/memory T cells were compared between patients with moderate to high (MoDA/HDA) and remission to low disease activity (REM/LDA). Correlation analysis between gMFIs and DAPSA scores were performed.

Results

Forty-two patients (female ratio: 0.48) with established PsA (median ± standard deviation, age: 56 ± 12.54 years, disease duration: 8.50 ± 7.10 years) were included in this study. Twenty-one percent of patients were in MoDA/HDA, while the remaining 79% were in REM/LDA. Patients in MoDA/HDA showed significantly higher pSTAT3 levels in CD4+ naïve (gMFI median ± standard deviation: 284.5 ± 79.9 vs 238 ± 92.9, p = 0.011), CD4- naïve (297 ± 107.5 vs 238 ± 98.4, p = 0.04), CD4+ memory (227 ± 62.9 vs 190.5 ± 72.2, p = 0.009) and CD4- memory T cells (209 ± 66.8 vs 167.0 ± 64.9, p = 0.036). On the other hand, PsA patients in remission or low disease activity displayed higher pSTAT1 levels in granulocytes (2509 ± 1887 vs 1330.5 ± 784.1, p = 0.040) and monocytes (255 ± 230 vs 144 ± 62.5, p = 0.049). Positive correlations were found between DAPSA scores and pSTAT3 in CD4+ naïve and memory T cells (Spearman’s correlation coefficient rho (ρ) = 0.5, p = 0.0012 and ρ = 0.47, p = 0.0025 resp.) whereas pSTAT1 in granulocytes and monocytes were negatively correlated with the DAPSA scores (ρ = -0.45, p = 0.0074 and ρ = -0.34, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Differential phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT1 molecules in circulating leucocyte subsets indicates PsA disease activity. Further studies to examine the value of STAT phosphorylation patterns guiding JAK inhibitor therapy are underway.

References

[1]U. Fiocco et al., “Ex vivo signaling protein mapping in T lymphocytes in the psoriatic arthritis joints,” J. Rheumatol., vol. 93, pp. 48–52, 2015, doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150636.

[2]S. K. Raychaudhuri, C. Abria, and S. P. Raychaudhuri, “Regulatory role of the JAK STAT kinase signalling system on the IL-23/IL-17 cytokine axis in psoriatic arthritis,” Ann. Rheum. Dis., vol. 76, no. 10, pp. e36–e36, 2017.

[3]E. Calautti, L. Avalle, and V. Poli, “Psoriasis: A STAT3-centric view,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1. MDPI AG, Jan. 06, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijms19010171.

[4]W. Taylor, D. Gladman, P. Helliwell, A. Marchesoni, P. Mease, and H. Mielants, “Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: Development of new criteria from a large international study,” Arthritis Rheum., vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2665–2673, 2006, doi: 10.1002/art.21972.

[5]M. M. Schoels, D. Aletaha, F. Alasti, and J. S. Smolen, “Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA): Defining remission and treatment success using the DAPSA score,” Ann. Rheum. Dis., vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 811–818, 2016, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207507.

Disclosure of Interests

Barbara Dreo: None declared, Daniel Ruben Pietsch: None declared, Rusmir Husic Speakers bureau: MSD, Lilly und Abbvie, Angelika Lackner: None declared, Johannes Fessler: None declared, Janine Rupp: None declared, Anirudh Subramanian Muralikrishnan: None declared, Jens Thiel Speakers bureau: GSK, BMS, AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant of: GSK, Novartis, Grant/research support from: BMS, Martin Stradner Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, AbbVie, Janssen, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Janssen, Philipp Bosch Grant/research support from: Pfizer

POS0380 EFFECTIVENESS OF REMOTE CARE INTERVENTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW INFORMING THE 2022 EULAR POINTS TO CONSIDER FOR REMOTE CARE IN RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES

Background

While the number of patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) is increasing worldwide, there is no adequate increment in the number of health care professionals, leading to the urgent need for new forms of care to take pressure from health care systems.1 2 Telehealth comprises a number of different types of interventions with the scope of performing certain steps of care, ranging from diagnostics to follow-up visits, in a remote manner. The use of remote care is heterogenous and guidance is needed to optimize the combination with conventional face-to-face (F2F) visits.

Objectives

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) on different outcomes of remote care compared to F2F care, its implementation into clinical practice and to identify drivers and barriers in order to inform a task force formulating the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Points to Consider for remote care in RMDs.

Methods

Prospective, retrospective, and qualitative studies testing different types of remote care in patients with RMDs were included. Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched through February 28th, 2021. Two reviewers independently performed standardized data extraction, synthesis, and risk of bias assessment.

Results

A total of 2,240 references were identified. Forty-seven studies, consisting of 26 randomized controlled trials, 8 prospective cohort studies, 8 cross sectional studies, and 5 qualitative studies were included.

Fifty-one percent of the studies involved patients with inflammatory RMDs, including rheumatoid arthritis, and spondyloarthritis, while 49% were on patients with non-inflammatory conditions, such as osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia. Remote monitoring (n=35) was most frequently studied, with telephone/video calls being the most common mode of delivery (n=30). Thirty-four studies investigated outcomes of remote care in comparison to F2F care. The most frequently assessed outcomes concerned efficacy and user perception of remote care, with 34% and 21% of studies, respectively, reporting superior results for the remote care intervention.

Time savings and flexibility were reported as major drivers, while inadequate technical knowledge and concerns in data security were the main barriers to implementing remote care. Implementation of remote care methods into clinical practice was not reported by the included studies. The main limitations were the heterogeneity of outcomes and interventions, and the substantial risk of bias (50% of studies with high risk of bias).

Conclusion

Studies on remote care reported similar to partially better results compared to F2F care concerning efficacy, and user perception outcomes, with the limitation of heterogeneity and considerable risk of bias.

References

[1]World Health Organization. WHO Guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for helath system strengthening. 2019 [Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311941/9789241550505-eng.pdf?ua=1 accessed 10.01.2022.

[2]James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018;392(10159):1789-858. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7

Disclosure of Interests

Andrea Marques: None declared, Philipp Bosch: None declared, Annette de Thurah Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Eli Lily, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Yvette Meissner Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Louise Falzon: None declared, Chetan Mukhtyar: None declared, Hans Bijlsma Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Arthrogen, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sun, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Arthrogen, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sun, UCB, Grant/research support from: Roche, Sun, Christian Dejaco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Galapagos, Sanofi, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Galapagos, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Pfizer, Tanja Stamm Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Consultant of: Abbvie, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Roche

Ultrasound-detected inflammation is more common in clinically manifest hand osteoarthritis than in painless bony enlarged finger joints: subanalysis of the population-based Bruneck study

Purpose:

The aim of this article is to examine the extent of structural and inflammatory lesions by ultrasound in elderly subjects with hand osteoarthritis (HOA) fulfilling the ACR classification criteria (Group A), in subjects with painless enlarged finger joints (Group B), and in individuals without clinical abnormalities at hands (Group C).

Methods:

This study was nested within the population-based, prospective Bruneck study; 293 subjects of ⩾65 years of age were assessed. Clinical and ultrasound assessment was conducted at wrists and finger joints. Gray scale synovitis (GSS), Power Doppler (PD), osteophytes, and erosions were scored semiquantitatively (0–3). The Short Form Score for the Assessment and Quantification of Chronic Rheumatic Affections of the Hands (SF-SACRAH), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) were retrieved.

Results:

Most subjects had ⩾1 ultrasound abnormality, of which osteophytes were the most prevalent finding in all groups (Group A: 100%, Group B: 99.4%, and Group C: 93.9%). GSS and PD-signals were more common in Group A than in Group B (94% versus 67% and 33% versus 13%, respectively). In Group C, GSS was observed in 39.4% of subjects. In subjects with HOA, the SF-SACRAH correlated with osteophyte scores (corr_coeff = 0.48), and the FIHOA correlated with the osteophyte (corr_coeff = 0.42) and PD scores (corr_coeff = 0.33).

Conclusion:

GSS and PD were more frequent in patients with symptomatic HOA than in cases with painless bony enlargements and subjects without clinical joint abnormalities. Functional restriction in HOA is associated with structural and inflammatory ultrasound changes.

Effectiveness of remote care interventions: a systematic review informing the 2022 EULAR Points to Consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

Objective

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) on different outcomes of remote care compared with face-to-face (F2F) care, its implementation into clinical practice and to identify drivers and barriers in order to inform a task force formulating the EULAR Points to Consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

Methods

A search strategy was developed and run in Medline (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently performed standardised data extraction, synthesis and risk of bias (RoB) assessment.

Results

A total of 2240 references were identified. Forty-seven of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Remote monitoring (n=35) was most frequently studied, with telephone/video calls being the most common mode of delivery (n=30). Of the 34 studies investigating outcomes of remote care, the majority addressed efficacy and user perception; 34% and 21% of them, respectively, reported a superiority of remote care as compared with F2F care. Time and cost savings were reported as major benefits, technical aspects as major drawback in the 13 studies that investigated drivers and barriers of remote care. No study addressed remote care implementation. The main limitation of the studies identified was the heterogeneity of outcomes and methods, as well as a substantial RoB (50% of studies with high RoB).

Conclusions

Remote care leads to similar or better results compared with F2F treatment concerning efficacy, safety, adherence and user perception outcomes, with the limitation of heterogeneity and considerable RoB of the available studies.

2022 EULAR points to consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

BACKGROUND

Remote care and telehealth have the potential to expand healthcare access, and the COVID-19 pandemic has called for alternative solutions to conventional face-to-face follow-up and monitoring. However, guidance is needed on the integration of telehealth into clinical care of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD).

OBJECTIVE

To develop EULAR points to consider (PtC) for the development, prioritisation and implementation of telehealth for people with RMD.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary EULAR task force (TF) of 30 members from 14 European countries was established, and the EULAR standardised operating procedures for development of PtC were followed. A systematic literature review was conducted to support the TF in formulating the PtC. The level of agreement among the TF was established by anonymous online voting.

RESULTS

Four overarching principles and nine PtC were formulated. The use of telehealth should be tailored to patient's needs and preferences. The healthcare team should have adequate equipment and training and have telecommunication skills. Telehealth can be used in screening for RMD as preassessment in the referral process, for disease monitoring and regulation of medication dosages and in some non-pharmacological interventions. People with RMD should be offered training in using telehealth, and barriers should be resolved whenever possible.The level of agreement to each statement ranged from 8.5 to 9.8/10.

CONCLUSION

The PtC have identified areas where telehealth could improve quality of care and increase healthcare access. Knowing about drivers and barriers of telehealth is a prerequisite to successfully establish remote care approaches in rheumatologic clinical practice.

The Digital Way to Intercept Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriasis (PsO) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) are chronic, immune-mediated diseases that share common etiopathogenetic pathways. Up to 30% of PsO patient may later develop PsA. In nearly 75% of cases, skin psoriatic lesions precede arthritic symptoms, typically 10 years prior to the onset of joint symptoms, while PsO diagnosis occurring after the onset of arthritis is described only in 15% of cases. Therefore, skin involvement offers to the rheumatologist a unique opportunity to study PsA in a very early phase, having a cohort of psoriatic “risk patients” that may develop the disease and may benefit from preventive treatment. Progression from PsO to PsA is often characterized by non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms, subclinical synovio-entheseal inflammation, and occasionally asymptomatic digital swelling such as painless toe dactylitis, that frequently go unnoticed, leading to diagnostic delay. The early diagnosis of PsA is crucial for initiating a treatment prior the development of significant and permanent joint damage. With the ongoing development of pharmacological treatments, early interception of PsA has become a priority, but many obstacles have been reported in daily routine. The introduction of digital technology in rheumatology may fill the gap in the physician-patient relationship, allowing more targeted monitoring of PsO patients. Digital technology includes telemedicine, virtual visits, electronic health record, wearable technology, mobile health, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Overall, this digital revolution could lead to earlier PsA diagnosis, improved follow-up and disease control as well as maximizing the referral capacity of rheumatic centers.

[Telemedical care and IT-based systems in rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and also the ever-increasing demands on the healthcare system, have led to a focus on the further development of telemedical services in rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE

What is the evidence for telemedical services in rheumatology?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Narrative review of existing literature on telemedicine in rheumatology.

RESULTS

Electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) can be determined by patients from their home and sent electronically to the rheumatologist. In future, ePROs may help with the decision whether a patient needs to attend the clinic for a visit or the visit can be rescheduled due to remission and well-being. Telemedicine has already been used for well-controlled patients with rheumatic diseases with good results in terms of safety and disease activity compared to conventional face-to-face visits. Telemedicine represents an interesting tool for appointment prioritization and triaging, while automated algorithm-based applications are currently too imprecise for routine clinical use. The role of smartphone applications in the care of patients with rheumatic diseases is still unclear.

DISCUSSION

Telemedicine represents an interesting option for certain patient populations with rheumatic diseases. Apart from research on the effectiveness and safety of telemedical interventions, decision makers need to set clear rules on how telemedicine should be used to provide the best possible care for the individual patient.

Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

OBJECTIVES

To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve prospective and retrospective studies published in English and comparing different (imaging) techniques, different settings and procedural protocols to guide interventions in patients with RMDs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases were searched through October 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool for randomised trials V.2 (ROB2), the RoB tool for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions and the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were included (most with moderate/high RoB); 49 were randomised controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies and 14 retrospective studies. Fifty-one studies compared either one imaging technique with another imaging technique, or with palpation-guided interventions. Ultrasound (US) was most frequently studied (49/51), followed by fluoroscopy (10/51). Higher accuracy was found for US or fluoroscopy compared with palpation-guided interventions. Studies comparing different imaging techniques (12/51) did not endorse one specific method. Different settings/equipment for imaging-guided procedures (eg, automatic vs manual syringes) were investigated in three studies, reporting heterogeneous results. Fifteen studies compared different imaging-guided procedures (eg, intra-articular vs periarticular injections).

CONCLUSION

Higher accuracy of needle positioning at joints and periarticular structures was seen in most studies when using imaging (especially US) guidance as compared with palpation-guided interventions with the limitation of heterogeneity of data and considerable RoB.

Current Practice of Imaging-Guided Interventional Procedures in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Results of a Multinational Multidisciplinary Survey

Objectives: To investigate opinion and routine practice of specialists from different disciplines on imaging techniques for interventional procedures related to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Methods: An English-language questionnaire was developed by an international working group and distributed to health care providers of various disciplines involved in the care of people with RMDs via an online survey tool (SoSci Survey®) from December 2019 to May 2020. Results: A total of 1,105 respondents from 56 countries completed the survey, over 60% of participants were rheumatologists. The majority of respondents (88%) performed interventional procedures in RMDs patients and 90% of them used imaging guidance. Ultrasonography was the most frequently used technique, particularly among rheumatologists. X-ray and computed tomography were mainly used by radiologists. A discrepancy emerged between the importance assigned to certain items such as the availability of a second operator and their actual implementation in clinical practice. Local barriers, lack of resources and facilities were mentioned as the most relevant obstacles in this regard. Lack of training on imaging and/or imaging guided procedures did not emerge as a barrier to perform such interventions; in fact, 19% of respondents performing the procedures indicated not to have received adequate training in this field. Conclusions: This is the first multinational multidisciplinary survey exploring in detail the opinions and practice on imaging guidance for interventional procedures in RMDs. A harmonization of protocols based on international guidelines, along with adequate training programmes and interventions on barriers at national/local levels are the main unmet needs requiring attention.

The role of tender and swollen joints for the assessment of inflammation in PsA using ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate tender joints (TJ) and swollen joints (SJ) for the assessment of ultrasound (US) defined inflammation in PsA.

METHODS

Eighty-three PsA patients underwent clinical and US examinations at two scheduled study visits 12 months apart. Tenderness and swelling were assessed at 68 and 66 joints respectively and US examinations were conducted at all 68 joints. At patient level, associations with clinical composites and US scores were performed using correlations and by analysing patients with predominantly tender (pTender) or swollen joints (pSwollen). At joint level, a PD value ≥ 1 was defined as active synovitis. A generalized linear mixed model was created to assess the predictive value of TJ and SJ for active synovitis after 12 months.

RESULTS

SJC showed better correlations with GS/PD scores (r = 0.37/0.47) than with TJC (PD: r = 0.33), while TJC correlated better with patient reported outcomes (PROMs) like patient global assessment (TJC: r = 0.57; SJC r = 0.39). Patients with pTender showed poorer results for PROMs and disease activity scores than patients with pSwollen, but not for laboratory or US markers of inflammation. Swollen joints showed active synovitis in 35% of cases, while only 16% of tender joints were active according to US. Swelling at baseline better predicted active synovitis at the same joint after 12 months (OR 6.33, p< 0.001) as compared with tenderness (OR 3.58, p< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SJ are more closely linked with US signs of inflammation as compared with TJ in PsA. Joint swelling is a better predictor for signs of US inflammation than tenderness after one year of follow-up.

POS0102 GO ASK YOUR PATIENTS! PSS-QoL REPORTED PERCEPTION OF DRYNESS CORRELATES WITH LACRIMAL AND SALIVARY FLOW IN PRIMARY SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME

Background:

The patient perspective is an essential outcome parameter in the quest for effective therapy in primary Sjögren’s Syndrome (PSS). The EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) is recommended by EULAR to quantify patient’s symptom burden and has been used in several clinical trials. Surprisingly, the patient’s perception of dryness quantified with ESSPRI does not correlate with objective measures of salivary or lacrimal flow.

Objectives:

Thus, we evaluated a newly developed assessment tool-the Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire (PSS-QoL) - for quantifying symptoms of dryness in comparison with the ESSPRI and objective measurements of salivary and lacrimal flow.

Methods:

Data of patients from the PSS registry of the Medical University of Graz fulfilling the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for PSS were analysed. The patient perspective was analyzed by PSS-QoL, ESSPRI, Xerostomia Inventory (XI) and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Sicca signs were measured with Schirmer’s test, unstimulated salivary flow test (USF) and stimulated salivary flow test (SSF). Patients were categorized into groups based on the presence of subjective and/or objective dryness: 1) objective dryness only, 2) subjective dryness only, and 3) both, subjective and objective dryness. ESSDAI (EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index) and EGA (Evaluator Global Assessment, numeric rating scale from 0 to 10) were obtained. In addition, free light chains (FLC) ĸ and λ, rheumatoid factor (RF) IgM and IgA were determined.

Results:

Data from 123 PSS patients were analyzed; 91.9% (n=113) were female, with a mean disease duration of 6.2 (±5.3) years and mean age of 60.1 (±12.4) years. PSS-QoL-dryness revealed significant negative correlations with Schirmer’s test (r=-0.31, p<0.05) and SSF-test (r=-0.39, p<0.01). In contrast, we found no significant correlation between ESSPRI-dryness and any objective dryness test. Lower perceived dryness was associated with higher immunological activity determined by increased levels of IgG, FLC and RF-IgA. Patients with objective signs and subjective symptoms of dryness had higher clinical and immunological disease activity compared to patients with subjective symptoms only (table 1).

Table 1.

Comparison of perceived dryness-groups with clinical parameters

PSS-QoL MouthpPSS-QoL Eyespsubjobj/subjsubjobj/subjEGA1.0 [0-5]2.0 [0-7]<0.051.0 [0-3]2.0 [0-7]<0.05ESSDAI1.0 [0-144.0 [0-15<0.053.0 [0-74.0 [0-15nsESSPRI-pain3.0 [0-9]3.0 [0-10]ns4.0 [1-8]3.0 [0-10]<0.05RF-IgM19.0 [5-524]31.0 [7-417]ns10.0[5-33]26.0[7-524]<0.01FLC-λ15.1 [7.0-68.3]20.1 [2.6-124.0]<0.0113.4 [7.0-54.5]18.7[2.6-124.0]<0.01IgG11.9 [6.5-37.2]16.1 [7.4-33.8]ns12.8 [6.5-20.6]14.8[7.4-37.2]nsC40.2 [0.01-0.41]0.17 [0.00-0.43]<0.010.2 [0.09-0.41]0.18 [0.00-0.43]nsRF-IgA11.0 [1-500]103 [0-500]<0.014.5 [1-465]63 [0-500]<0.01

C4=Complementfactor 4; EGA=Evaluators Global Assessment; ESSDAI=EULAR Sjögren Syndrome Disease Activity Index; ESSPRI=EULAR Sjögren Syndrome Patient Reported Index; FLC-λ=Free light chain Lambda; IgG=Immunoglobulin G; obj/subj=objective and subjective dryness-group; PSS-QoL=Primary Sjögren Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire; RF-IgA=rheumatoid factor Immunoglobulin A; RF-IgM=rheumatoid factor Immunoglobulin M; subj=subjective dryness-group.

Conclusion:

Patients’ perception of dryness assessed by PSS-QoL correlates with objective measurements of salivary gland function while ESSPRI-dryness did not. Based on the PSS-QoL and objective measures of dryness two distinct groups of PSS patients could be distinguished, which may have implications in daily practice and future clinical studies.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared