Abstract CT235: MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcomas

Background: Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a negative regulator of tumor suppressor protein p53. MDM2 induces degradation of p53 and promotes tumorigenesis. MDM2 amplification occurs in many cancers but is documented in up to 100% of well-differentiated or de-differentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLPS) [Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Cell 2017]. Inhibition of the MDM2-p53 interaction is a promising therapeutic approach to restore p53 tumor suppressor activity in WD/DDLPS. Milademetan (RAIN-32) is a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor that inhibits the MDM2-p53 interaction and restores p53 function at nanomolar concentrations. In a phase 1 study, milademetan showed promising efficacy in 53 patients with WD/DDLPS when administered on an intermittent schedule (260 mg QD on Days 1-3 and 15-17 on a 28-day cycle), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months [Gounder et al. AACR-NCI-EORTC 2020]. WD/DDLS are relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and systemic treatment options for patients with advanced disease are limited. MANTRA (RAIN-3201) is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with unresectable or metastatic DDLPS with disease progression on ≥1 prior systemic therapies.

Methods: Eligible patients are ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed unresectable and/or metastatic DDLPS, with or without a WD component, who have received ≥1 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 anthracycline-based regimen, with radiographic evidence of progression by RECIST v1.1 within 6 months before study entry. Prior treatment with trabectedin or an MDM2 inhibitor is not permitted. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive milademetan (260 mg once daily orally Days 1-3 and 15-17 on a 28-day cycle) or trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Randomization is stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1) and number of prior treatments for WD/DDLPS (≤2 or >2). Tumor response will be evaluated by RECIST v1.1 at Weeks 8, 16, 24, and 32, and then every 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints: overall survival; disease control rate; objective response rate; duration of response; PFS by investigator assessment; safety; health-related quality of life. Exploratory endpoints: molecular markers in peripheral blood and/or tumor tissue; milademetan pharmacokinetics. To demonstrate a 3-month increase in PFS (from 3 to 6 months) corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.5, approximately 160 patients will be required to observe 105 events with 93.9% power and 2-sided significance level of 5%. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04979442.

Citation Format: Mrinal M. Gounder, Gary K. Schwartz, Robin L. Jones, Sant P. Chawla, Victoria S. Chua-Alcala, Silvia Stacchiotti, Andrew J. Wagner, Gregory M. Cote, Robert G. Maki, Hanna Kosela-Paterczyk, Dale R. Shepard, Naisargee Shah, Richard Bryce, Robert C. Doebele, Shreyaskumar Patel. MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT235.

Using CDKN2A loss in the context of wildtype TP53 to predict sensitivity for the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan

3136

Background: MDM2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that plays a critical role in the degradation of the tumor suppressor p53. Milademetan (RAIN-32) is an orally available, small molecule inhibitor of MDM2 that disrupts the MDM2-p53 complex thereby restoring p53 activity. Approximately 50% of tumors harbor wildtype (WT) TP53 and thus may be susceptible to strategies that reactivate p53. The CDKN2A gene is altered in more than 15% of all tumors (TCGA PanCancer Atlas) and encodes two proteins, p14ARF and p16, which are inhibitors of p53 and cyclin dependent kinases, respectively. Given the role of p14ARF in regulating the MDM2-p53 pathway, we investigated the use of CDKN2A loss in the context of WT TP53 as a strategy for selection of patients who might benefit from milademetan. Methods: N/A. Results: We evaluated the sensitivity of 215 cancer cell lines to milademetan treatment (Ishizawa et al., 2018) by CDKN2A and TP53 status. The median IC50 of CDKN2A homozygous (HZ) loss vs. non-HZ loss was 8,620 vs. 10,000 nM. However, when we assessed CDKN2A HZ loss with WT TP53 versus mutant TP53 the median IC50 was 79.5 vs. 10,000 nM demonstrating that the use of both CDKN2A and TP53 was better able to discriminate sensitive vs. resistant cell lines. To validate these in vitro findings, we tested milademetan in 5 xenograft models with CDKN2A HZ loss and WT TP53, all of which demonstrated tumor growth inhibition with milademetan. As suppression of p53 activity by MDM2 amplification (Kato et al. 2017) or CDKN2A loss (Adib et al. 2021) has been associated with resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), we also tested the combination of anti-PD1 with milademetan in the colon-26 syngeneic model ( CDKN2A HZ loss) and observed a significant enhancement in tumor growth inhibition compared to milademetan or anti-PD1 alone. Based on the differential sensitivity to milademetan using both CDKN2A loss and WT TP53 status we evaluated TCGA Pan-Cancer Atlas data to estimate the frequency of these genetic co-alterations. Among solid tumors types the most frequent percentage of these co-alterations included glioblastoma, mesothelioma, melanoma, bladder, sarcoma, pancreatic and NSCLC. Overall, the percentage of all tumors with co-alteration of CDKN2A HZ loss and WT TP53 was 6.2%. Patients with CDKN2A HZ loss had a significantly worse overall survival than those without CDKN2A HZ loss (median OS of 29.7 vs. 97.4 months, p < 0.0001), and this was maintained when accounting for tumor type in multivariate analysis (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Milademetan showed evidence of preclinical anti-tumor activity across multiple tumor types with CDKN2A loss and WT TP53. In vivo data supported potential synergy of milademetan with an ICI in this genetic subset. A clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of milademetan plus atezolizumab in advanced solid tumors with CDKN2A HZ loss and WT TP53 (MANTRA-4) is planned.

MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcomas

TPS11589

Background: Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a negative regulator of tumor suppressor protein p53. MDM2 induces degradation of p53 and promotes tumorigenesis. MDM2 amplification occurs in many cancers but is documented in up to 100% of well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcomas (WD/DDLPS) [Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Cell 2017]. Inhibition of the MDM2-p53 interaction is a promising therapeutic approach to restore p53 tumor suppressor activity in WD/DDLPS. Milademetan (RAIN-32) is a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor that inhibits the MDM2-p53 interaction and restores p53 function at nanomolar concentrations. In a phase 1 study, milademetan showed promising efficacy in 53 patients with WD/DDLPS when administered on an intermittent schedule (260 mg QD on Days 1–3 and 15–17 on a 28-day cycle), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months [Gounder et al. AACR-NCI-EORTC 2020]. WD/DDLS are relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and systemic treatment options for patients with advanced disease are limited. MANTRA (RAIN-3201) is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with unresectable or metastatic DDLPS with disease progression on ≥ 1 prior systemic therapies. Methods: Eligible patients are ≥ 18 years of age with histologically confirmed unresectable and/or metastatic DDLPS, with or without a WD component, who have received ≥ 1 prior systemic therapies, including ≥ 1 anthracycline-based regimen, with radiographic evidence of progression by RECIST v1.1 within 6 months before study entry. Prior treatment with trabectedin or an MDM2 inhibitor is not permitted. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive milademetan (260 mg once daily orally Days 1–3 and 15–17 on a 28-day cycle) or trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Randomization is stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1) and number of prior treatments for WD/DDLPS (≤ 2 or > 2). Tumor response will be evaluated by RECIST v1.1 at Weeks 8, 16, 24, and 32, and then every 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints: overall survival; disease control rate; objective response rate; duration of response; PFS by investigator assessment; safety; health-related quality of life. Exploratory endpoints: molecular markers in peripheral blood and/or tumor tissue; milademetan pharmacokinetics. To demonstrate a 3-month increase in PFS (from 3 to 6 months) corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.5, approximately 160 patients will be required to observe 105 events with 93.9% power and 2-sided significance level of 5%. Clinical trial information: NCT04979442.

The phase II MutHER study of neratinib alone and in combination with fulvestrant in HER2 mutated, non-amplified metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

HER2 mutations (HER2^mut) induce endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this single arm multi-cohort phase II trial, we evaluated the efficacy of neratinib plus fulvestrant in patients with ER+/HER2^mut, HER2-non-amplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the fulvestrant-treated (n=24) or fulvestrant-naïve cohort (n=11). Patients with ER-negative/HER2^mut MBC received neratinib monotherapy in an exploratory ER- cohort (n=5).

RESULTS

The clinical benefit rate (CBR: 95% CI) was 38% (18-62%), 30% (7-65%), and 25% (1-81%) in the fulvestrant-treated, fulvestrant-naïve, and ER- cohort, respectively. Adding trastuzumab at progression in 5 patients resulted in 3 partial responses and 1 stable disease {greater than or equal to}24 weeks. CBR appeared positively associated with lobular histology and negatively associated with HER2 L755 alterations. Acquired HER2^mut were detected in 5 of 23 patients at progression.

CONCLUSION

Neratinib and fulvestrant is active for ER+/HER2^mut MBC. Our data supports further evaluation of dual HER2 blockade for the treatment of HER2^mut MBC.

Abstract P031: MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan (RAIN-32) versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcoma

Background: p53 plays a central role in tumor suppression and maintenance of genome integrity. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) is a ubiquitin ligase that inhibits p53 transcriptional activity and induces p53 degradation through ubiquitination. MDM2 amplification occurs in many cancers but is universal in well-differentiated (WD) or de-differentiated (DD) liposarcomas (100% of cases) [Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Cell 2017]. Current therapies for WD/DD liposarcomas include anthracycline-based chemotherapy, eribulin, and trabectedin. Inhibition of the MDM2-p53 interaction is a promising therapeutic approach to restore p53 tumor suppressor activity in liposarcomas. Milademetan (RAIN-32) is a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor that inhibits the MDM2-p53 interaction and restores p53 function at nanomolar concentrations. In a phase 1 study, milademetan showed promising efficacy in patients with WD/DD liposarcoma when administered on an intermittent schedule (260 mg on Days 1–3 and 15–17 every 28 days), with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 months [Gounder et al. AACR-NCI-EORTC 2020]. MANTRA (RAIN-3201) is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of milademetan versus trabectedin in patients with unresectable or metastatic DD liposarcoma with disease progression on ≥1 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 anthracycline-based regimen (EudraCT: 2021-001394-23). Methods: Eligible patients are ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed unresectable and/or metastatic DD liposarcoma, with or without a WD component, who have received ≥1 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 anthracycline-based regimen, with radiographic evidence of progression within 6 months before study entry. Prior treatment with trabectedin or an MDM2 inhibitor is not permitted. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive milademetan (260 mg once daily orally Days 1–3 and 15–17 on a 28-day cycle) or trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Randomization is stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1) and number of prior treatments for liposarcoma (≤2 or &gt;2). Tumor response will be evaluated by RECIST v1.1 at Weeks 8, 16, 24, and 32, and then every 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints: overall survival; disease control rate; objective response rate; duration of response; PFS by investigator assessment; safety; health-related quality of life. Exploratory endpoints: molecular markers in peripheral blood and/or tumor tissue; milademetan pharmacokinetics. To demonstrate a 3-month increase in PFS (from 3 to 6 months) corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.5, approximately 160 patients will be required to observe 105 events with 93.9% power and 2-sided significance level of 5%. MANTRA is currently open to enrollment.

Citation Format: Mrinal Gounder, Gary Schwartz, Robin Jones, Shreyaskumar Patel, Silvia Stacchiotti, Andrew Wagner, Vijaya Tirunagaru, Naisargee Shah, Richard Bryce, Robert Doebele. MANTRA: A randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study of the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan (RAIN-32) versus trabectedin in patients with de-differentiated liposarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P031.

Biomarker Analysis of the Phase III NALA Study of Neratinib + Capecitabine versus Lapatinib + Capecitabine in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Neratinib plus capecitabine (N+C) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in NALA (NCT01808573), a randomized phase III trial comparing N+C with lapatinib + capecitabine (L+C) in 621 patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting. We evaluated correlations between exploratory biomarkers and PFS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Somatic mutations were evaluated by next-generation sequencing on primary or metastatic samples. HER2 protein expression was evaluated by central IHC, H-score, and VeraTag/HERmark. p95 expression (truncated HER2) was measured by VeraTag. HRs were estimated using unstratified Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty samples had successful sequencing: 34.0% had PIK3CA mutations and 5.5% had HER2 (ERBB2) mutations. In the combined patient populations, PIK3CA mutations trended toward shorter PFS [wild-type vs. mutant, HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-1.03], whereas HER2 mutations trended toward longer PFS [HR = 1.69 (95% CI, 0.97-3.29)]. Higher HER2 protein expression was associated with longer PFS [IHC 3+ vs. 2+, HR = 0.67 (0.54-0.82); H-score ≥240 versus <240, HR = 0.77 (0.63-0.93); HERmark positive vs. negative, HR = 0.76 (0.59-0.98)]. Patients whose tumors had higher HER2 protein expression (any method) derived an increased benefit from N+C compared with L+C [IHC 3+, HR = 0.64 (0.51-0.81); H-score ≥ 240, HR = 0.54 (0.41-0.72); HERmark positive, HR = 0.65 (0.50-0.84)], as did patients with high p95 [p95 ≥2.8 relative fluorescence (RF)/mm2, HR = 0.66 (0.50-0.86) vs. p95 < 2.8 RF/mm2, HR = 0.91 (0.61-1.36)].

CONCLUSIONS

PIK3CA mutations were associated with shorter PFS whereas higher HER2 expression was associated with longer PFS. Higher HER2 protein expression was also associated with a greater benefit for N+C compared with L+C.

Analysis of the pan-Asian subgroup of patients in the NALA Trial: a randomized phase III NALA Trial comparing neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in patients with HER2+metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with two or more HER2-directed regimens

PURPOSE

Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein.

METHODS

621 centrally assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd) + C (750 mg/m² bid, day 1-14) with loperamide prophylaxis or to L (1250 mg qd) + C (1000 mg/m² bid, day 1-14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety.

RESULTS

104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P = 0.0011), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P = 0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P = 0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; P < 0.0001) were extended with N+C, compared to L+C. The incidences of grade 3/4 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation were mostly comparable between the two arms. Diarrhea and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were the most frequent TEAEs in both arms, similar to the overall population in incidence and severity.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01808573.

Abstract CT026: A phase II trial of neratinib (NER) or NER plus fulvestrant (FUL) (N+F) in HER2 mutant, non-amplified (HER2mut) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Part II of MutHER

Introduction: The irreversible pan-HER inhibitor NER showed modest single agent activity for HER2mut MBC in Part I of MutHER trial. In Part II, we hypothesized that (1) N+F would improve activity in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2mut MBC due to ER-HER2 crosstalk and (2) dual HER2 blockade by adding trastuzumab at disease progression (PD) could overcome resistance.

Methods: Pts with ER+HER2mut MBC were enrolled to 2 cohorts (FUL treated or naive) to receive N+F with diarrhea prophylaxis. ER- pts received NER in an exploratory ER- cohort. Trastuzumab was added at PD if approved by insurance. Simon's Minimax 2-stage phase II design with the primary endpoint of clinical benefit rate (CBR: rates of complete/partial response [CR/PR] plus stable disease [SD] &gt;24 weeks [wks]), with anticipated vs null hypothesis being CBR of 55% vs 35% (FUL treated) or 65% vs 40% (FUL naïve) with 80% power, 1 sided 0.05 alpha, was used. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Serial blood samples were analyzed for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by Guardant360 for concomitant mutations, HER2mut variant allele frequency (VAF) dynamics, and resistance mechanisms.

Results: Between Sep. 2015 and Oct. 2020, 40 pts with HER2mut MBC were enrolled, completing the 1st stage of each ER+ cohort. 35 pts (21 FUL treated, 10 FUL naïve, 4 ER-) were evaluable for response, with median age 63 (35-82) years, 3 (0-12) prior MBC regimen, lobular BC in 13 (37%) and visceral mets in 32 (91%) pts. 21 (68%) ER+ pts had prior CDK4/6 inhibitor. All but 1 pt has come off study due to PD. Table 1 shows the efficacy by cohort. Further enrollment is closed per protocol. Adding trastuzumab at PD induced CB in 4 (3 PR, 1 SD≥24 wks) of 5 pts (1 ER-, 4 ER+), with PFS 28 (95% CI 18~NA) wks. Common AEs across cohorts were diarrhea (G3 21%) and fatigue (G3 5%). No G4 AEs.

ctDNA HER2mut was detected in 72% (23/32) baseline (BL) samples tested. In pts with paired samples, HER2mut VAF decreased at C1D15/C2D1 from BL in 75% (15/20) and rose in 89% (16/18) at PD. Acquired HER2mut, including the T798I gatekeeper mutation, were detected in 2 pts at PD. Mutations in TP53 (53%), PIK3CA (43%), and CDH1 (35%) were common, but none significantly associated with PFS in all or ER+ pts.

Conclusions: NER, or N+F, is active for HER2mut MBC with good tolerability. Adding trastuzumab at PD induced further response, supporting dual HER2 blockade for HER2mut MBC.

Table 1.EfficacyCohortFUL treatedFUL naïveER-Best Response, n evaluablen = 21n = 10n = 4CR, n100PR, n431SD (≥ 24 wks), n300SD (&lt; 24 wks), n1030PD, n343CBR, n with CB/total n evaluable, % (95% CI)8 of 20*, 40% (19~64%)3 of 10, 30% (7~65%)1 of 4, 25% (0.6~81%)mPFS (95% CI), wks, ITT (n)24 (16~31) wks, (n = 24)20 (8~NA) wks, (n = 11)8.5 (8~NA) wks, (n = 5)*20 of 21 pts are evaluable for CBR in the FUL treated Cohort as 1 pt had SD as best response and treatment is still ongoing. ITT (intent to treat) population is used for mPFS estimate.

Citation Format: Cynthia X. Ma, Jingqin Luo, Rachel A. Freedman, Timothy Pluard, Julie Nangia, Janice Lu, Frances Valdez-Albini, Melody Cobleigh, Jason Jones, Nancy U. Lin, Eric Winer, P. Kelly Marcom, Shana Thomas, Jill Anderson, Brittney Haas, Kimberly M. Hamann, Richard Bryce, Alshad S. Lalani, Lisa Carey, Matthew Goetz, Feng Gao, Gretchen Kimmick, Mark Pegram, Matthew J. Ellis, Ron Bose. A phase II trial of neratinib (NER) or NER plus fulvestrant (FUL) (N+F) in HER2 mutant, non-amplified (HER2mut) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Part II of MutHER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.

Immigration law enforcement, social support, and health for Latino immigrant families in Southeastern Michigan

RATIONALE

Social support is a key determinant of physical and mental health outcomes. Implementation of restrictive immigration policies in the U.S. under the Trump administration impacted the way mixed-status Latino families (i.e., those with varying legal statuses, including undocumented) maintained social relationships and provided social support.

OBJECTIVE

This paper examines how federal immigration policies introduced after the 2016 U.S. presidential election impacted social networks and support related to health for undocumented and mixed-status Latino families.

METHODS

We interviewed 23 clients and 28 service providers at two Federally Qualified Health Centers and one non-profit organization in Southeast Michigan. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Policies introduced during the Trump administration increased opportunities for deportation and contributed to the isolation of mixed-status Latino families by transforming safe spaces of social interaction into prime locations for immigration enforcement activity. Despite the limitations created by these restrictive policies, mixed-status families employed alternative mechanisms to maintain access to vital informal and formal support systems while simultaneously navigating emerging immigration-related threats.

CONCLUSIONS

Elections have health consequences and immigration policies are needed that promote the health and well-being of Latino immigrant communities.

Efficacy of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine in the Subgroup of Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement from the NALA Trial

Background

Neratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C).

Materials and Methods

NALA was a randomized, active‐controlled trial in patients who received two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens for HER2‐positive MBC. Patients with asymptomatic/stable brain metastases (treated or untreated) were eligible. Patients were assigned to N + C (neratinib 240 mg per day, capecitabine 750 mg/m² twice daily) or L + C (lapatinib 1,250 mg per day, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily) orally. Independently adjudicated progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and CNS endpoints were considered.

Results

Of 621 patients enrolled, 101 (16.3%) had known CNS metastases at baseline (N + C, n = 51; L + C, n = 50); 81 had received prior CNS‐directed radiotherapy and/or surgery. In the CNS subgroup, mean PFS through 24 months was 7.8 months with N + C versus 5.5 months with L + C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.05), and mean OS through 48 months was 16.4 versus 15.4 months (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59–1.38). At 12 months, cumulative incidence of interventions for CNS disease was 25.5% for N + C versus 36.0% for L + C, and cumulative incidence of progressive CNS disease was 26.2% versus 41.6%, respectively. In patients with target CNS lesions at baseline (n = 32), confirmed intracranial objective response rates were 26.3% and 15.4%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

These analyses suggest improved PFS and CNS outcomes with N + C versus L + C in patients with CNS metastases from HER2‐positive MBC.

Implications for Practice

In a subgroup of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive breast cancer after two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens, the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine was associated with improved progression‐free survival and CNS outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These findings build on previous phase II and III studies describing efficacy of neratinib in the prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, and support a role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option in the management of patients with HER2‐positive brain metastases following antibody‐based HER2‐directed therapies.

This article reports outcomes among HER2‐positive breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine.

A pilot randomized controlled trial of a fruit and vegetable prescription program at a federally qualified health center in low income uncontrolled diabetics

Eating a healthy diet is important for managing diabetes. Although there are high rates of diabetes in low-income urban areas, these patients often have limited access to fruits and vegetables. The 15-week Fresh Prescription (Fresh Rx) program was designed to improve access and consumption of fruits and vegetables among low-income patients with diabetes in Detroit, MI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a fruit and vegetable prescription program on changes in hemoglobin A1C (HbA₁C), blood pressure (BP), and body mass index (BMI) in patients with diabetes in a randomized controlled trial at a federally qualified health center (FQHC). Patients randomized to the Fresh Rx group (n = 56) were allotted up to $80 ($10 for up to eight weeks) for purchase of produce from a farmers market based at the FQHC. The control group (n = 56) received standard treatment plus information on community resources to improve health. Outcomes were compared at baseline and within three months of program completion. There were no significant between-group differences for any of the outcomes at program completion (p > .05); however, there was a small effect size for HbA1c (partial η² = 0.02). Within the Fresh Rx group, HbA1c significantly decreased from 9.64% to 9.14% (p = 0.006). However, no changes were noted within the control group (9.38 to 9.41%, p = 0.89). BMI and BP did not change from pre- to post-study in either group (p > .05). Results from this study offer preliminary evidence that produce prescription programs may reduce HbA₁C in low-income patients with diabetes.

Neratinib efficacy in a subgroup of patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and central nervous system (CNS) involvement: Findings from the SUMMIT basket trial

9068

Background: The phase 2 SUMMIT basket trial (NCT01953926) demonstrated efficacy of neratinib in patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC [Boni et al. WCLC 2020]. Neratinib also has documented activity in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with CNS metastases [Saura et al. SABCS 2020 & J Clin Oncol 2020]. Here we report neratinib efficacy in a subgroup of patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC and CNS involvement from SUMMIT. Methods: Patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC were treated with single-agent neratinib (240 mg po daily). Prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), chemotherapy, and checkpoint inhibitors (IO) were allowed. Patients with stable, asymptomatic CNS metastasis were enrolled. Study endpoints: objective response rate (ORR) at week 8 (±1 week); ORR (RECIST 1.1 confirmed); duration of response (DOR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); progression-free survival (PFS); safety; biomarkers. Results: Baseline characteristics of 11 patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC: median age 67 (range 56–83) years; ECOG PS 0/1 (45%/55%). Prior lines of therapies: 2 (range 1–3): EGFR TKIs (91%); chemotherapy (55%); IO (27%). 3/11 patients had baseline CNS metastasis and received radiation 8–22 months prior to study enrollment. Best CNS response in these 3 patients was stable disease with overall individual PFS of 1.9 (censored), 6.9 and 9.1 months and OS of 2.6 (censored), 17.7 (censored), and 17.9 months. Efficacy is summarized in Table. Efficacy summary: TKI-pretreated EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC cohort receiving neratinib monotherapy. Conclusions: Activity of single-agent neratinib was observed in prior TKI-exposed patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC. Despite the small sample size of only 3 patients with baseline CNS metastases, findings suggest a potential role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option for patients with NSCLC and difficult-to-treat uncommon mutations with CNS involvement. The SUMMIT trial continues to enroll patients with EGFR exon 18-mutant NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926. [Table: see text]

Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and ≥ 2 prior HER2-directed regimens

PURPOSE

To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study.

METHODS

In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points.

RESULTS

Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63-1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32-2.23]).

CONCLUSION

In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.

Abstract PD13-09: Impact of neratinib on outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with central nervous system disease at baseline: Findings from the phase 3 NALA trial

Background: The development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases presents a considerable challenge in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) due to the limited availability of evidence-based treatments. Up to 50% of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) MBC develop CNS metastases during the course of their disease. Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity against CNS metastases in HER2+ MBC in two phase 2 studies (NEfERT-T, TBCRC 022) and one phase 3 study (NALA); significant benefits for predefined CNS endpoints were reported in NEfERT-T and confirmed in NALA. Here we present an exploratory analysis of patients from NALA with CNS involvement at enrollment.

Methods: NALA was an international, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, phase 3 study in patients with HER2+ MBC who had received ≥2 lines of HER2-directed therapy in the metastatic setting (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01808573). Patients with asymptomatic metastatic brain disease managed with stable doses of corticosteroids for ≥14 days prior to randomization were eligible, whereas patients with symptomatic or unstable brain metastases were excluded. Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to neratinib (N; 240 mg qd po) + capecitabine (C; 750 mg/m2 bid po) or lapatinib (L; 1250 mg qd po) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid po). Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS disease was a secondary endpoint. CNS disease at baseline was defined as patients with treated or untreated disease in the ‘brain’ assessed by investigator at enrollment. CNS imaging was not mandatory at screening.

Results: Of the 621 patients enrolled in NALA, 101 (16%) had documented baseline CNS disease and 520 (74%) had no CNS disease at baseline. Patients with CNS disease had a lower performance status and were more likely to have hormone receptor-negative disease than those with no CNS disease; no major imbalances of baseline characteristics were noted between treatment arms. Overall, 78 (77%) patients had previously received CNS radiation [whole brain, n=59 (58%); stereotactic, n=17 (17%); unknown, n=2 (2%)], and 5 (5%) patients had undergone CNS surgery. Median treatment duration was 5.7 (IQR 2.8-8.5) months for N, and 3.5 (IQR 2.1-6.9) months for L. PFS, OS, and cumulative incidence of interventions for symptomatic CNS disease are summarized in the table. No new safety signals were detected.

Conclusions: Regardless of the status of CNS metastases at baseline, patients appeared to have better outcomes in the N+C arm compared with the L+C arm.

Table. Efficacy outcomes in patients with and without CNS disease at baselineIntention-to-treat (n=621)CNS metastases at baseline – Yes (n=101)CNS metastases at baseline – No (n=520)N+C (n=307)L+C (n=314)N+C (n=51)L+C (n=50)N+C (n=256)L+C (n=264)PFSaHazard ratio (95% CI)0.76 (0.63–0.93)0.66 (0.41–1.05)0.76 (0.62–0.94)P-value0.00590.07410.0099Restricted mean PFSb, months8.86.67.85.59.06.9Difference, months2.22.32.1OSHazard ratio (95% CI)0.88 (0.72–1.07)0.90 (0.59–1.38)0.85 (0.68–1.06)P-value0.20860.63520.1517Restricted mean OSb, months24.022.216.415.425.623.6Difference, months1.71.02.0Incidence of CNS interventionOverall cumulative incidencec, %22.7629.1940.1347.7919.1624.65P-value0.0430.4300.067aCentrally confirmed; bRestriction prespecified as 24 months for PFS, and 48 months for OS; c % requiring intervention for CNS disease (competing risk model)

Citation Format: Cristina Saura, Larisa Ryvo, Sara Hurvitz, William Gradishar, Beverly Moy, Suzette Delaloge, Sung-Bae Kim, Mafalda Oliveira, Maureen Trudeau, Ming-Shen Dai, Barbara Haley, Ron Bose, Luciana Landeiro, Judith Bebchuk, Aimee Frazier, Kiana Keyvanjah, Richard Bryce, Adam Brufsky. Impact of neratinib on outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with central nervous system disease at baseline: Findings from the phase 3 NALA trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-09.

Abstract PS9-02: Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life (HRQoL) while improving progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens

Background: The FDA approved neratinib (N), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with capecitabine (C) for patients with HER2+ advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting based on the NALA clinical study, where N+C significantly improved PFS vs. lapatinib (L)+C. Characterizing HRQoL associated with this regimen can help inform treatment decision-making for these patients. The objective of this analysis was to characterize HRQoL among patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer from the NALA clinical study.

Methods: NALA was a multinational, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical study of N+C vs. L+C in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens. From May 2013 to July 2017, patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd) + C (750 mg/m2 bid 14d/21d) with loperamide prophylaxis during the first cycle, or to L (1250 mg qd) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid 14d/21d). HRQoL, a prespecified secondary endpoint of the NALA study, was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23 at baseline and every 6 weeks (±3 days) until the end of treatment (data collection through treatment cycle 19, 12.5 months). The QLQ-C30 summary and global health status scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and the systemic therapy side-effects scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Patients were included in the analysis for a particular scale if they had a baseline assessment and at least 1 follow-up assessment. For these analyses, a change of ≥10 points was considered to be clinically meaningful. Descriptive statistics summarized observed scores and changes from baseline, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for time-to-deterioration (TTD) of ≥10 points and mixed models estimated the change over time for 7 prespecified scales: QLQ-C30 summary score, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation and diarrhea, and the EORTC QLQ-BR23 systemic therapy side effects subscale. No adjustments for multiplicity were performed.

Results: 621 patients from 28 countries were randomized (307 N+C; 314 L+C). The mean completion rate of the QLQ-C30 over the course of the study was 91% for both treatment arms. Discontinuation due to any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was lower in the N+C vs. L+C arm (14% vs. 18%). At baseline, the mean (SD) QLQ-C30 summary scores were 79.8 (14.1) for N+C and 79.9 (15.7) for L+C. After 19 treatment cycles, the mean (SD) QLQ-C30 summary scores were similar to baseline scores: 81.8 (16.7) for N+C and 81.3 (15.3) for L+C. There were no differences in TTD of ≥10 points for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the HR for N+C vs. L+C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63-1.40). All prespecified HRQoL subscales had similar statistically non-significant results for TTD with the exception of diarrhea (HR=1.71; 95% CI 1.32-2.23). The mixed models analyzing change in HRQoL from baseline did not demonstrate persistent declines nor meaningful differences between the treatment arms.

Conclusion: In these results from the NALA study, among patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, at study end and throughout most of the study, there were no differences observed between the two treatment arms in HRQoL scores. HRQoL was sustained over the study period despite the early transient presence of diarrhea in some patients. Discontinuation due to any TEAE was lower in the N+C vs. the L+C arm. These results may help guide healthcare providers, patients and carers in selection of optimal treatment for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

Citation Format: Beverly Moy, Mafalda Oliveira, Cristina Saura, William Gradishar, Sung-Bae Kim, Adam Brufsky, Sara Hurvitz, Larisa Ryvo, Daniele Fagnani, Nancy Chan, Sujith R Kalmadi, Paula Silverman, Suzette Delaloge, Richard Bryce, Kiana Keyvanjah, Judith Bebchuk, Bo Zhang, Nina Oestreicher, Ron Bose. Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life (HRQoL) while improving progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-02.

Abstract PD3-03: Continued efficacy of neratinib in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: Final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase 3 ExteNET trial

Background: Neratinib (NERLYNX®) is an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor that significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared with placebo when given as extended adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. In the phase 3 ExteNET trial, an absolute iDFS benefit of 2.5% and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) benefit of 1.7% were observed with neratinib after 5 years’ follow-up. As reflected in the approved indication by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease who initiated neratinib treatment within 1 year of completing trastuzumab (HR+/≤1 year) experienced an absolute iDFS benefit of 5.1% and DDFS benefit of 4.7% at 5 years. In HR+/≤1 year patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy, absolute 5-year iDFS and DDFS benefits of 7.4% and 7.0%, respectively, were observed. Here we report the final protocol-defined, event-driven analysis of overall survival (OS) from ExteNET, and provide descriptive analyses of subgroups of primary interest according to the EU label and current clinical practice in early-stage HER2+ disease.

Methods: ExteNET was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of women with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer who had completed neoadjuvant or adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (NCT00878709). Patients were randomly assigned to oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo for 1 year. Hazard ratios (HR) for OS were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models, and survival rates by the Kaplan-Meier method. The OS analysis was event-driven and powered for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population with a target of 248 events. Descriptive analyses were performed in the HR+/≤1 year subgroup per the approved indication in the EU, and in higher-risk patients, i.e. HR+/≤1 year who have residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy [i.e. those who did not achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR)]. Cut-off date: July 2019.

Results: 2840 patients were randomized to study treatment (1420 per group). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 127 (8.9%) and 137 (9.6%) patients in the neratinib and placebo ITT groups had died, respectively. The 8-year OS rates were 90.1% (95% CI, 88.3–91.6) in the neratinib group and 90.2% (95% CI, 88.4–91.7) in the placebo group (absolute difference at 8 years -0.1%; stratified HR=0.95; 95% CI, 0.75–1.21; p=0.6914). A positive trend was seen in the prespecified HR+ subgroup (n=1631; absolute difference at 8 years 1.5%; HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.58–1.12), and within this population, descriptive analyses suggested greater benefits with neratinib in the HR+/≤1 year subgroup (n=1334; absolute difference at 8 years 2.1%; HR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.55–1.13) and in the HR+/≤1 year subset with no pCR after neoadjuvant therapy (n=295; absolute difference at 8 years 9.1%; HR=0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.92). No new safety signals were reported with this long-term follow-up to 8 years.

Conclusions: In this final OS analysis of ExteNET, there were fewer deaths with neratinib than placebo in the ITT population, but the results did not reach statistical significance. Analyses showed greater OS improvements with neratinib in subgroups including HR+/≤1 year, and HR+/≤1 year with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. These findings are consistent with the results based on the primary endpoint of iDFS, and support the use of neratinib in clinical practice in these patients.

Citation Format: Frankie Ann Holmes, Beverly Moy, Suzette Delaloge, Stephen Chia, Bent Ejlertsen, Janine Mansi, Hiroji Iwata, Michael Gnant, Mark Buyse, Carlos Barrios, Tajana Silovski, Robert Separovic, Anna Bashford, Angel Guerrero-Zotano, Neelima Denduluri, Debra Patt, Erhan Gokmen, Ira Gore, John Smith, Richard Bryce, Feng Xu, Alvin Wong, Miguel Martin, Arlene Chan. Continued efficacy of neratinib in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: Final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase 3 ExteNET trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-03.

Evaluation of neratinib (N), pembrolizumab (P), everolimus (E), and nivolumab (V) in patients (pts) with fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC)

310

Background: FLC, a rare liver cancer of young adults, has no effective systemic therapies. Surgical resection is used extensively with non-curative intent. FLC is associated with a DNAJB1- PRKACA chimeric transcript that produces a fusion protein with retained kinase activity and increased expression of several oncogenic signaling pathways including, but not limited to, HER2 ( ERBB2). Methods: N (240 mg oral daily) was studied in FLC pts in the SUMMIT study (NCT01953926); and later under compassionate use for N-based combinations (combo): P (2 mg/kg q3w), E (7.5 mg daily), and V (240 mg q2w) in doublet or triplet regimens. Eligible pts: ≥12y; histologically confirmed FLC; adequate organ function; any number of prior therapies. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints: duration of response; clinical benefit rate (CBR); safety (CTCAE v4.0); somatic and germline sequencing (MSK IMPACT). Results: As of 03-Sep-2020, 15 pretreated pts received N in SUMMIT (confirmed ORR 0%; CBR 13%). Efficacy data for 5 pts from SUMMIT and 2 more pts receiving combo under compassionate use (4 male, 3 female, median age 26 years, median 0 [range 0–4] prior systemic therapies) are in shown in the table. The most common adverse events (AE) with single-agent N (n = 5) were diarrhea (grade 1 80%; grade 2 20%) and nausea (grade 1 60%); other AEs were grade ≤1 in ≤20% of pts. Conclusions: N monotherapy had limited benefit as a single agent in FLC pts. Several case studies evaluating N-based combo with checkpoint inhibitors administered under compassionate use demonstrated that NP led to 1 PR, and the triplet of NPE to prolonged SD. These are case-limited observations but are critical and worth evaluating further in upcoming clinical trials given the continued lack of a standard of care therapy for pts with FLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926. [Table: see text]

Application of the Minority Stress Theory: Understanding the Mental Health of Undocumented Latinx Immigrants

This paper applies the Minority Stress framework to data collected from an ongoing community-based participatory research project with health and social service agencies in Southeast Michigan. We examine the stressors and coping strategies employed by undocumented Latinx immigrants and their families to manage immigration-related stress. We conducted in-depth interviews with 23 immigrant clients at Federally Qualified Health Care Centers (FQHC) in Southeast Michigan and 28 in-depth interviews with staff at two FQHC's and a non-profit agency serving immigrants. Findings suggest that immigrants face heightened anxiety and adverse mental health outcomes because of unique minority identity-related stressors created by a growing anti-immigrant social environment. Chronic stress experienced stems from restrictive immigration policies, anti-immigrant rhetoric in the media and by political leaders, fear of deportation, discriminatory events, concealment, and internalized anti-immigrant sentiment. Though identity can be an important effect modifier in the stress process, social isolation in the immigrant community has heightened the impact of stress and impeded coping strategies. These stressors have resulted in distrust in community resources, uncertainty about future health benefits, delayed medical care, and adverse mental health outcomes. Findings provide a framework for understanding the unique stressors experienced by immigrants and strategies for interventions by social service agencies.

LRRC8A is essential for hypotonicity-, but not for DAMP-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation

The NLRP3 inflammasome is a multi-molecular protein complex that converts inactive cytokine precursors into active forms of IL-1β and IL-18. The NLRP3 inflammasome is frequently associated with the damaging inflammation of non-communicable disease states and is considered an attractive therapeutic target. However, there is much regarding the mechanism of NLRP3 activation that remains unknown. Chloride efflux is suggested as an important step in NLRP3 activation, but which chloride channels are involved is still unknown. We used chemical, biochemical, and genetic approaches to establish the importance of chloride channels in the regulation of NLRP3 in murine macrophages. Specifically, we identify LRRC8A, an essential component of volume-regulated anion channels (VRAC), as a vital regulator of hypotonicity-induced, but not DAMP-induced, NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Although LRRC8A was dispensable for canonical DAMP-dependent NLRP3 activation, this was still sensitive to chloride channel inhibitors, suggesting there are additional and specific chloride sensing and regulating mechanisms controlling NLRP3.

Impact of anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies on frontline health and social service providers in Southeast Michigan, U.S.A

Rising hostility towards immigrants characterised the 2016 Presidential election in the United States (US) and subsequent policy priorities by the new presidential administration. The political shift towards aggressive policies targeting undocumented immigrants is far-reaching and extends into other communities that convive con-or coexist with-immigrant communities. Our study aims to examine the rippling effects of these anti-immigrant policies and rhetoric on health and social service providers in Southeast Michigan who predominantly serve Latino immigrants. Between April and August 2018, we conducted in-depth individual interviews in two Federally Qualified Health Centers and a non-profit social service agency at a county health department. We interviewed 28 frontline health and social service providers. After coding and thematic analyses, we found that staff members' experiences in supporting immigrant clients was congruent with definitions of secondary trauma stress and compassion fatigue, whereby exposure to clients' trauma combined with job burden subsequently impacted the mental health of providers. Major themes included: (a) frontline staff experienced a mental and emotional burden in providing services to immigrant clients given the restrictive anti-immigrant context; and (b) this burden was exacerbated by the increased difficulties in providing these services to their clients. Staff described psychological and emotional distress stemming from exposure to clients' immigration-related trauma and increased mental health needs. This distress was exacerbated by an increased demand to meet clients' needs, which involved explaining or translating documents into English, assisting with legal paperwork, referring clients to mental health resources, addressing increased transportation barriers, and reestablishing trust with the community. Our findings add qualitative data on the mental health implications for frontline providers who support Latino immigrant clients impacted by immigration and highlights the need for further research and resources that address the workplace-related stress generated by heightened immigration enforcement.

Improved tolerability of neratinib in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer: the CONTROL trial

BACKGROUND

Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for extended adjuvant treatment in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer based on the phase III ExteNET study. In that trial, in which no antidiarrheal prophylaxis was mandated, grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 40% of patients and 17% discontinued due to diarrhea. The international, open-label, sequential-cohort, phase II CONTROL study is investigating several strategies to improve tolerability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who completed trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy received neratinib 240 mg/day for 1 year plus loperamide prophylaxis (days 1-28 or 1-56). Sequential cohorts evaluated additional budesonide or colestipol prophylaxis (days 1-28) and neratinib dose escalation (DE; ongoing). The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhea.

RESULTS

Final data for loperamide (L; n = 137), budesonide + loperamide (BL; n = 64), colestipol + loperamide (CL; n = 136), and colestipol + as-needed loperamide (CL-PRN; n = 104) cohorts, and interim data for DE (n = 60; completed ≥six cycles or discontinued; median duration 11 months) are available. No grade 4 diarrhea was observed. Grade 3 diarrhea rates were lower than ExteNET in all cohorts and lowest in DE (L 31%, BL 28%, CL 21%, CL-PRN 32%, DE 15%). Median number of grade 3 diarrhea episodes was one; median duration per grade 3 episode was 1.0-2.0 days across cohorts. Most grade 3 diarrhea and diarrhea-related discontinuations occurred in month 1. Diarrhea-related discontinuations were lowest in DE (L 20%, BL 8%, CL 4%, CL-PRN 8%, DE 3%). Decreases in health-related quality of life did not cross the clinically important threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Neratinib tolerability was improved with preemptive prophylaxis or DE, which reduced the rate, severity, and duration of neratinib-associated grade ≥3 diarrhea compared with ExteNET. Lower diarrhea-related treatment discontinuations in multiple cohorts indicate that proactive management can allow patients to stay on neratinib for the recommended time period. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02400476.

Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With ≥ 2 HER2-Directed Regimens: Phase III NALA Trial

PURPOSE

NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808573) is a randomized, active-controlled, phase III trial comparing neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), plus capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib, a reversible dual TKI, plus capecitabine (L+C) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed MBC regimens.

METHODS

Patients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1:1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m² twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m² twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

A total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+C, n = 307; L+C, n = 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P = .0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = .2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+C versus L+C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P = .043). ORRs were N+C 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+C 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P = .1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P = .0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+C 83% v L+C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

N+C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+C. No new N+C safety signals were observed.