Remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apoB absolute mass changes explain results of the PROMINENT trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The PROMINENT trial, a cardiovascular outcome trial of the triglyceride- and remnant cholesterol-lowering agent pemafibrate, has shown neutral results despite reduction in plasma triglycerides and remnant cholesterol. We tested the hypothesis that absolute mass changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B explain the results of the PROMINENT trial.

METHODS

Among 108,431 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS), those who met the key inclusion criteria of the PROMINENT trial were analyzed to mimic the trial design. Endpoint atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and coronary revascularization as defined in PROMINENT.

RESULTS

In the PROMINENT trial, treatment with pemafibrate resulted in -7 mg/dL (-0.18 mmol/L; -18 %) change in remnant cholesterol, +10 mg/dL (+0.26 mmol/L; +12 %) LDL cholesterol, and +5 mg/dL (+0.05 g/L; +5 %) apolipoprotein B. In the CGPS mimicking PROMINENT, the estimated hazard ratios for ASCVD were 0.97 (95 % confidence interval: 0.94-0.99) for a -7 mg/dL (-0.18 mmol/L) change in remnant cholesterol, 1.04 (1.01-1.07) for a +10 mg/dL (+0.26 mmol/L) change in LDL cholesterol, and 1.02 (1.01-1.03) for a +5 mg/dL (+0.05 g/L) change in apolipoprotein B. When combining absolute changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B, the estimated hazard ratio for ASCVD was 1.05 (0.96-1.14) in the CGPS mimicking PROMINENT compared to 1.03 (0.91-1.15) in the PROMINENT trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute mass changes in remnant cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B can explain results of the PROMINENT trial. The 3 mg/dL (0.08 mmol/L) higher total atherogenic cholesterol together with 5 mg/dL (0.05 g/L) higher apolipoprotein B seem to explain the trend toward more ASCVD in the pemafibrate arm.

Remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation jointly in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: implications for clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death despite the development of effective treatments. Recently, elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation have emerged as factors explaining part of the residual ASCVD risk. Interestingly, the coexistence of both high remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation can further increase the risk of ASCVD. The aim of this review is to describe the role of elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation, separately and combined, in ASCVD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results from recently published studies, including observational and genetic Mendelian randomization studies, support a causal relationship between elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation on risk of ASCVD in both primary and secondary prevention settings. In addition, current evidence from observational studies suggests that the coexistence of elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation further increases the risk of ASCVD.

SUMMARY

Recent observational studies suggest that high remnant cholesterol combined with low-grade inflammation may confer a particular high risk for ASCVD. Attention on the dual threat from high remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation is necessary, and further research in this field is warranted. The effect of remnant cholesterol-lowering drugs and anti-inflammatory drugs on ASCVD risk alone and combined remains to be elucidated.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COCN/A20.

Effect of Eicosapentaenoic Acid/Docosahexaenoic Acid on Coronary High-Intensity Plaques Detected Using Noncontrast T1-weighted Imaging: The AQUAMARINE EPA/DHA Randomized Study

AIM

Omega-3 fatty acids have emerged as a new option for controlling the residual risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) in the statin era. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) is associated with reduced CAD risk in the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention trial, whereas the Statin Residual Risk with Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia trial that used the combination EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has failed to derive any clinical benefit. These contradictory results raise important questions about whether investigating the antiatherosclerotic effect of omega-3 fatty acids could help to understand their significance for CAD-risk reduction.

METHODS

The Attempts at Plaque Vulnerability Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Noncontrast T1-weighted Technic EPA/DHA study is a single-center, triple-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label trial used to investigate the effect of EPA/DHA on high-risk coronary plaques after 12 months of treatment, detected using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with CAD receiving statin therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to no-treatment, 2-g/day, and 4-g/day EPA/DHA groups. The primary endpoint was the change in the plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio (PMR) of coronary high-intensity plaques detected by CMR. Coronary plaque assessment using computed tomography angiography (CTA) was also investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 84 patients (mean age: 68.2 years, male: 85%) who achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of ＜100 mg/dL were enrolled. The PMR was reduced in each group over 12 months. There were no significant differences in PMR changes among the three groups in the primary analysis or analysis including total lesions. The changes in CTA parameters, including indexes for detecting high-risk features, also did not differ.

CONCLUSION

The EPA/DHA therapy of 2 or 4 g/day did not significantly improve the high-risk features of coronary atherosclerotic plaques evaluated using CMR under statin therapy.

Combined Social Frailty and Life-Space Activities Associated with Risk of Disability: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between social frailty and life-space activities, and determine whether a combined status of life-space activities and social frailty is associated with risk of disability among older adults.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The participants were 8,301 older adults (mean age 72.9 ± 5.6 years, women [53.3%]) from a community setting.

METHODS

Life-space activities were evaluated using the Active Mobility Index (AMI) to assess activities in each life-space (distance from the respondent's home: up to 1 km, 1-10 km, or greater than 10 km) during the past 1 month. Activities were also assessed according to physical or social activity. Social frailty and characteristics were measured at the baseline. Incident disability was assessed according to long term care insurance.

RESULTS

The lowest scoring group was based on the quartile in each of the AMI scores (Q1), with reference to the highest scoring group, which had a higher odds ratios for social frailty (AMI total score Q1: OR 4.32, 95% CI 3.43-5.45, AMI physical score Q1: 2.19, 95% CI 1.79-2.69, AMI social score Q1: 5.04, 95% CI 3.94-6.44). During the follow-up (mean 23.5 months), 330 participants had incident disability. Incident disability was associated with social frailty. Combined status of social frailty and low AMI increased the risk of disability (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.52-3.03), with reference to non-frailty and higher AMI scores.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Social frailty or reduced activity in life-space assessment were identified as risk factors for incident disability. To decrease the risk of disability, the development of an intervention program to enhance activities and cope with social frailty is required.

Lipoproteins, Cholesterol, and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in East Asians and Europeans

One fifth of the world population live in East Asia comprising Japan, Korea, and China where ischemic heart disease, a major component of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), is the second most frequent cause of death. Each of low-density lipoproteins (LDL), remnant lipoproteins, and lipoprotein(a), summarized as non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL) or apolipoprotein B (apoB) containing lipoproteins, causes ASCVD. However, a significant proportion of the evidence on lipoproteins and lipoprotein cholesterol with risk of ASCVD came from White people mainly living in Europe and North America and not from people living in East Asia or of East Asian descent. With a unique biological, geohistorical, and social background in this world region, East Asians have distinctive characteristics that might have potential impact on the association of lipoproteins and lipoprotein cholesterol with risk of ASCVD. Considering the movement across national borders in the World, understanding of lipoprotein and lipoprotein cholesterol evidence on ASCVD in East Asia is important for both East Asian and non-East Asian populations wherever they live in the World.In this review, we introduce the biological features of lipoproteins and lipoprotein cholesterol and the evidence for their association with risk of ASCVD in East Asian and European populations. We also provide an overview of guideline recommendations for prevention of ASCVD in these two different world regions. Finally, specific preventive strategies and future perspectives are touched upon.

Dual elevated remnant cholesterol and C-reactive protein in myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation each cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); however, it is unknown whether joint elevation of both factors confers the highest risk. We tested the hypothesis that dual elevated remnant cholesterol and low-grade inflammation marked by elevated C-reactive protein is associated with the highest risk of myocardial infarction, ASCVD, and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

The Copenhagen General Population Study randomly recruited white Danish individuals aged 20-100 years in 2003-2015 and followed them for a median 9.5 years. ASCVD was cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

In 103,221 individuals, we observed 2,454 (2.4%) myocardial infarctions, 5,437 (5.3%) ASCVD events, and 10,521 (10.2%) deaths. The hazard ratios increased with each of stepwise higher remnant cholesterol and stepwise higher C-reactive protein. In individuals with the highest tertile of both remnant cholesterol and C-reactive protein compared to individuals with the lowest tertile of both, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios were 2.2 (95%CI:1.9-2.7) for myocardial infarction, 1.9 (1.7-2.2) for ASCVD, and 1.4 (1.3-1.5) for all-cause mortality. Corresponding values for only the highest tertile of remnant cholesterol were 1.6 (1.5-1.8), 1.4 (1.3-1.5), and 1.1 (1.0-1.1), and those for only the highest tertile of C-reactive protein were 1.7 (1.5-1.8), 1.6 (1.5-1.7), and 1.3 (1.3-1.4), respectively. There was no statistical evidence for interaction between elevated remnant cholesterol and elevated C-reactive protein on risk of myocardial infarction (p = 0.10), ASCVD (p = 0.40), or all-cause mortality (p = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual elevated remnant cholesterol and C-reactive protein confers the highest risk of myocardial infarction, ASCVD, and all-cause mortality, that is, compared to either of these two factors individually.

Can remnant cholesterol (triglyceride-rich lipoproteins) reclassify estimated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent studies analyzing reclassification of estimated risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) by inclusion of remnant cholesterol (= cholesterol content in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins) in primary and secondary prevention settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

For individuals in a primary prevention setting with remnant cholesterol levels at least 95th percentile (≥1.6 mmol/l, 61 mg/dl), 23% of MI and 21% of IHD events developed later were reclassified correctly from below to above 5% for 10-year occurrence when remnant cholesterol levels were added to models based on conventional risk factors, whereas no events were reclassified incorrectly. Overall improved reclassification of MI was also observed for remnant cholesterol levels as low as at least 50th percentile (≥0.6 mmol/l, 25 mg/dl); however, the addition of remnant cholesterol over the entire concentration range yielded insignificant improvements of NRI for MI but slightly improved reclassification of NRI for IHD. In a secondary prevention setting, addition of remnant cholesterol over the entire concentration range to a conventional risk model improved reclassification.

SUMMARY

Elevated remnant cholesterol levels considerably improves reclassification of individuals who later develop MI and IHD, in primary as well as in secondary prevention settings.

Comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of claudin 18.2 expression in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted comprehensive clinical and molecular characterization of claudin 18.2 expression (CLDN18.2) in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced GC/GEJC who received systemic chemotherapy from October 2015 to December 2019 with available tumor specimens were analyzed. We evaluated clinicopathological features of CLDN18.2 expression with four molecular subtypes: mismatch repair deficient, Epstein-Barr virus-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and others. In addition, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), genomic alterations, and the expression of immune cell markers were assessed. Clinical outcomes of standard first- or second-line chemotherapy and subsequent anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy were also investigated according to CLDN18.2 expression.

RESULTS

Among 408 patients, CLDN18.2-positive (moderate-to-strong expression in ≥75%) was identified in 98 patients (24.0%) with almost equal distribution in the four molecular subtypes or CPS subgroups. CLDN18.2-positive was associated with Borrmann type 4, KRAS amplification, low CD16, and high CD68 expression. Overall survival with first-line chemotherapy was not significantly different between CLDN18.2-positive and -negative groups [median 18.4 versus 20.1 months; hazard ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 0.89-1.78); P = 0.191] regardless of stratification by PD-L1 CPS ≥5. Progression-free survival and objective response rates of first- and second-line chemotherapy, and anti-PD-1 therapy also showed no significant differences according to CLDN18.2 status.

CONCLUSIONS

CLDN18.2 expression in advanced GC/GEJC was associated with some clinical and molecular features but had no impact on treatment outcomes with chemotherapy or checkpoint inhibition. CLDN18.2-positive also had no impact on overall survival. This information could be useful to interpret the results from currently ongoing clinical trials of CLDN18.2-targeted therapies for advanced GC/GEJC and to consider a treatment strategy for CLDN18.2-positive GC/GEJC.

Predictive Validity of Different Walking Measures to Identify the Incident Long-Term Care Needs in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

A comfortable walking speed is a suitable measurement of functional status in older adults. In addition to assessing their comfortable walking speed, two complex walking tests were administered to a cohort of older people, assuming that these tests would be a more sensitive predictor of the incident long-term care needs than comfortable walking speed.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study was conducted to collect data.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Among the initial 5,563 community-dwelling independent older adults (aged ≥ 65 years), 935 were excluded and the data of 4,628 (mean age, 73.9 ± 5.5 years, 65-94 years; 2,052 men, 2,576 women) older adults were finally analyzed.

METHODS

Three walking tasks were administered: comfortable, complicated balance, and Go-stop walking. Complicated balance walking was measured under comfortable walking conditions, with participants having to walk with their hands crossed at the shoulder joint at 90°. For the Go-stop walking test, the time taken to walk 2 meters was measured using a stopwatch. For two years following baseline assessments, participants received monthly follow-ups for incident certification of the need for care under the long-term care insurance (LTCI) system.

RESULTS

Low performance in comfortable, complicated balance, and Go-stop walking were 29.8%, 37.7%, and 35.1%, respectively. During the 24-month follow-up period, 246 participants (5.3%) required LTCI certification. The Youden Index was used to determine the cut-points of the incident long-term care needs in the comfortable, complicated balance, and Go-stop walking conditions, which were 1.055 m/s, 0.936 m/s, and 3.205 seconds, respectively. Participants classified as exhibiting low performance included 1,381 (29.8%) under comfortable walking, 1,746 (37.7%) under complicated balance walking, and 1,623 (35.1%) under the Go-stop walking tests. The C-indices of the comfortable, complicated balance, and Go-stop walking tests were 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.76), 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74), and 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.69), respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed significant relationships between the incident long-term care needs and the comfortable (hazard ratio (HR) 2.14, 95% CI 1.62-2.84), complicated balance (1.81, 1.36-2.41), and Go-stop (1.46, 1.12-1.91) walking conditions.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The findings suggest that slow walking speed has a considerably greater impact on the incident long-term care needs in older adults. However, the complex walking task did not improve the predictive performance. Comfortable walking speed tests, which can easily be measured to predict the future incident long-term care needs, are effective tools in community health promotion and primary care.

Pooled safety analysis from phase III studies of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed clinical benefit, including improved survival and manageable safety in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) or gastric/gastroesophageal junction (mGC/GEJC) cancer in the phase III RECOURSE and TAGS trials, respectively. A pooled analysis was conducted to further characterize FTD/TPI safety, including management of haematologic toxicities and use in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with ≥2 prior regimens for advanced mGC/GEJC or mCRC were randomized (2 : 1) to FTD/TPI [35 mg/m² twice daily days 1-5 and 8-12 (28-day cycle); same dosage in both trials] or placebo plus best supportive care. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized in the safety population (patients who received ≥1 dose) and analysed by renal/hepatic function.

RESULTS

TAGS and RECOURSE included 335 and 533 FTD/TPI-treated and 168 and 265 placebo-treated patients, respectively. Overall safety of FTD/TPI was similar in TAGS and RECOURSE. Haematologic (neutropenia, anaemia) and gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhoea) AEs were most commonly observed. Laboratory-assessed grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37% (TAGS)/38% (RECOURSE) of FTD/TPI-treated patients (median onset: 29 days/55 days), and 96% (TAGS)/97% (RECOURSE) of cases resolved regardless of renal/hepatic function. Supportive medications for neutropenia were received by 17% (TAGS) and 9% (RECOURSE); febrile neutropenia was reported in 2% and 4%, respectively. Overall grade ≥3 AEs were more frequent in patients with moderate renal impairment [81% (TAGS); 85% (RECOURSE)] versus normal renal function (74%; 67%); anaemia and neutropenia were more common in patients with renal impairment. FTD/TPI safety (including haematologic AEs) was consistent across patients with normal and mildly impaired hepatic function.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support FTD/TPI as a well-tolerated treatment in patients with mGC/GEJC or mCRC, with a consistent safety profile. Safety was largely similar in patients with normal or mildly impaired renal/hepatic function; however, patients with renal impairment should be monitored for haematologic toxicities.

The effect of achieving LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L to prevent the first atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in the primary prevention settings of severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Introduction

The International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS) has proposed “severe familial hypercholesterolemia” (FH) as a phenotype with the highest cardiovascular risk. LDL-C <2.5 mmol/l is a recommended therapeutic goal for the primary prevention settings of severe FH. However, given that ESC guidelines recommends LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l in FH patients, this stricter goal may be better to prevent the first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in severe FH patients.

Purpose

To determine whether achieving LDL-C<1.8 mg/dl is more beneficial to reduce the first ASCVD events.

Methods

A total of 148 severe FH subjects without any history of ASCVD were analyzed. Severe FH was defined as untreated LDL-C >10.3 mmol/l, LDL-C >8.0 mmol/l+ 1 high-risk feature, LDL-C >4.9 mmol/l + 2 high-risk features according to IAS proposed statement. The occurrence of ASCVD (all-cause death, CAD, ischemic stroke and lower extremity artery disease (LEAD)) were compared in those with on-treatment LDL-C < and ≥1.8 mmol/L.

Results

10.1% (=15/148) of study subjects achieved on-treatment LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l. They were more likely to receive PCSK9 inhibitor (15.0 vs. 66.7%, p<0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in FH-related physical characteristics (tendon xanthomas: 72.2 vs. 93.3%, p=0.12) and causative genotypes (LDLR: 68.4 vs. 66.7%, p=1.00, PCSK9: 8.3 vs. 6.7%, p=1.00, LDLR/PCSK9: 3.8 vs. 6.7%, p=0.48), untreated LDL-C (7.3±1.7 vs. 7.9±1.8 mmol/l, p=0.22) and lipoprotein(a) (23 [11–42] vs. 25 [15–70] mg/dl, p=0.41) levels between two groups. During the observational period (median=7.0 years), severe FH achieving on-treatment LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l was associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing ASCVD events (Figure 1). Of note, any cardiovascular events did not occur in severe FH who achieved on-treatment LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l. In those with on-treatment LDL ≥1.8 mmol/L, CAD (76.5%=26/34) was more dominant component of ASCVD, followed by ischemic stroke (17.6%=6/34) and LEAD (5.9%=2/34).

Conclusions

A significantly lower frequency of ASCVD was observed in severe FH who achieved LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L in the primary prevention settings. Given that only 10.1% of severe FH patients achieved LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l, more actions are required to motivate physicians for further intensified management of LDL-C in severe FH patients in the primary prevention settings.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Characterization of Polyvascular Disease in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Its Association With Circulating Lipoprotein(a) Levels

Background Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) more likely exhibits extensive atherosclerotic disease at multiple vascular beds. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an atherogenic lipoprotein that elevates HeFH-related atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks. Whether circulating Lp(a) level associates with polyvascular propagation of atherosclerosis in subjects with HeFH remains uncertain. Methods and Results The current study analyzed 370 subjects with clinically diagnosed HeFH who received evaluation of systemic arteries. Polyvascular disease (polyVD) was defined as more than 2 coexisting atherosclerosis conditions including coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, or peripheral artery disease. Clinical characteristics and lipid features were analyzed in subjects with HeFH and polyVD; 5.7% of patients with HeFH (21/370) had polyVD. They were more likely to have a clustering of risk factors, tendon (P<0.001) and skin xanthomas (P=0.004), and corneal arcus (P=0.026). Furthermore, an elevated Lp(a) level (P=0.006) and a greater frequency of Lp(a) level ≥50 mg/dL (P<0.001) were observed in subjects with HeFH and polyVD. On multivariable analysis adjusting risk factors and lipid-lowering agents, Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR], 5.66 [95% CI, 1.68-19.0], P=0.005), age, and family history of premature coronary artery disease independently predicted polyVD in subjects with HeFH. Of note, the prevalence of polyVD rose to 33.3% in patients with HeFH and age >58 years old, family history of premature coronary artery disease, and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (OR, 10.3 [95% CI, 3.12-33.4], P<0.001). Conclusions An increased level of circulating Lp(a) levels predicted concomitance of polyVD in patients with HeFH. The current findings suggest subjects with HeFH and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL as a high-risk category who require meticulous screening of systemic vascular beds.

Elevated Remnant Cholesterol Reclassifies Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease and Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Elevated remnant cholesterol causes ischemic heart disease.

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that the inclusion of elevated remnant cholesterol will lead to appropriate reclassification of individuals who later experience myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

For >10 years we followed up 41,928 white Danish individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study without a history of ischemic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and statin use. Using predefined cut points for elevated remnant cholesterol, we calculated net reclassification index (NRI) from below to above 5%, 7.5%, and/or 10% 10-year occurrence of myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease defined as a composite of death from ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

For individuals with remnant cholesterol levels ≥95th percentile (≥1.6 mmol/L, 61 mg/dL), 23% (P < 0.001) of myocardial infarction and 21% (P < 0.001) of ischemic heart disease were reclassified correctly from below to above 5% for 10-year occurrence when remnant cholesterol levels were added to models based on conventional risk factors, whereas no events were reclassified incorrectly. Consequently, the addition of remnant cholesterol levels yielded NRI of 10% (95% CI: 1%-20%) for myocardial infarction and 5% (95% CI: -3% to 13%) for ischemic heart disease. Correspondingly, when reclassifications were combined from below to above 5%, 7.5%, and 10% risk of events, 42% (P < 0.001) of individuals with myocardial infarction and 41% (P < 0.001) with ischemic heart disease were reclassified appropriately, leading to NRI of respectively 20% (95% CI: 9%-31%) and 11% (95% CI: 2%-21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated remnant cholesterol levels considerably improve myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease risk prediction.

Pimitespib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (CHAPTER-GIST-301): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) refractory to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is poor. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of pimitespib, a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in advanced GIST refractory to standard TKIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed GIST refractory to imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib were randomized 2:1 to oral pimitespib 160 mg/day or placebo for five consecutive days per week in 21-day cycles. Following disease progression by blinded central radiological review (BCRR), crossover to open-label pimitespib was permitted. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by BCRR in the full analysis set. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) adjusted using the rank preserving structural failure time method to reduce the expected confounding impact of crossover.

RESULTS

From Oct 31, 2018 to Apr 30, 2020, 86 patients were randomized to pimitespib (n=58) or placebo (n=28). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.6-2.9) with pimitespib versus 1.4 months (0.9-1.8) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95% CI 0.30-0.87]; one-sided p=0.006). Pimitespib showed an improvement in crossover-adjusted OS compared with placebo (HR 0.42 [0.21-0.85], one-sided p=0.007). Seventeen (60.7%) patients receiving placebo crossed-over to pimitespib; median PFS after crossover was 2.7 (95% CI 0.7-4.1) months. The most common (≥30%) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with pimitespib were diarrhea (74.1%) and decreased appetite (31.0%); the most common (≥10%) grade ≥3 treatment-related AE was diarrhea (13.8%). Treatment-related AEs leading to pimitespib discontinuation occurred in 3 (5.2%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Pimitespib significantly improved PFS and crossover-adjusted OS compared with placebo and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced GIST refractory to standard TKIs.

How Can We Identify Very High-Risk Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia?

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a genetic disorder that elevates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, despite their atherogenic lipid profiles, the cardiovascular risk of HeFH varies in each individual. Their variety of phenotypic features suggests the need for better risk stratification to optimize their therapeutic management. The current review summarizes three potential approaches, including (1) definition of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)-related risk scores, (2) genetic analysis, and (3) biomarkers. The International Atherosclerosis Society has recently proposed a definition of severe FH to identify very high-risk HeFH subjects according to their clinical characteristics. Furthermore, published studies have shown the association of FH-related genetic phenotypes with ASCVD, which indicates the genetic analysis’s potential to evaluate individual cardiovascular risks. Biomarkers reflecting disease activity have been considered to predict the formation of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of ASCVD in HeFH subjects. Incorporating these risk stratifications will be expected to allocate adequate intensity of lipid-lowering therapies in HeFH subjects, which ultimately improves cardiovascular outcomes.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma enrolled in the randomized KEYNOTE-181 trial in Asia

BACKGROUND

In the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-181 study, pembrolizumab prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥10. We report a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) enrolled in KEYNOTE-181 in Asia, including patients from the KEYNOTE-181 China extension study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and forty Asian patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-181, including the China cohort. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for ≤2 years or investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. OS, progression-free survival, response, and safety were analyzed without formal comparisons. OS was evaluated based on PD-L1 CPS expression level.

RESULTS

In Asian patients with ESCC, median OS was 10.0 months with pembrolizumab and 6.5 months with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.80; nominal P < 0.0001]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 months with pembrolizumab and 3.1 months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; nominal P = 0.020). Objective response rate was 17.1% with pembrolizumab and 7.1% with chemotherapy; median duration of response was 10.5 months and 7.7 months, respectively. In patients with PD-L1 CPS <1 tumors (pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy), the HR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.56-1.72); the HR (95% CI) for death was better for patients with PD-L1 CPS cut-offs >1 [CPS ≥1, 0.57 (0.44-0.75); CPS ≥5, 0.56 (0.41-0.76); CPS ≥10, 0.53 (0.37-0.75)]. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 71.8% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 89.8% in the chemotherapy group; grade 3-5 events were reported in 20.0% and 44.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy in Asian patients with ESCC, with fewer treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 is an appropriate cut-off and a predictive marker of pembrolizumab efficacy in Asian patients with ESCC.

Clinical usefulness of a novel fluorescence technique for the intraoperative diagnosis of surgical margins in patients with breast cancer

In both 5- and 15-min data, FI was significantly higher in malignant tissues than in benign tissues. The diagnostic accuracy was similar at 5 and 15 min. Therefore, the 5-min FI was enough applying in the further analyses.

The Japan-Multimodal Intervention Trial for Prevention of Dementia (J-MINT): The Study Protocol for an 18-Month, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Background/Objectives

The Japan-multimodal intervention trial for prevention of dementia (J-MINT) is intended to verify the effectiveness of multi-domain interventions and to clarify the mechanism of cognitive improvement and deterioration by carrying out assessment of dementia-related biomarkers, omics analysis and brain imaging analysis among older adults at high risk of dementia. Moreover, the J-MINT trial collaborates with partnering private enterprises in the implementation of relevant interventional measures. This manuscript describes the study protocol.

Design/Setting

Eighteen-month, multi-centered, randomized controlled trial.

Participants

We plan to recruit 500 older adults aged 65–85 years with mild cognitive impairment. Subjects will be centrally randomized into intervention and control groups at a 1:1 allocation ratio using the dynamic allocation method with all subjects stratified by age, sex, and cognition.

Intervention

The multi-domain intervention program includes: (1) management of vascular risk factors; (2) group-based physical exercise and self-monitoring of physical activity; (3) nutritional counseling; and (4) cognitive training. Health-related information will be provided to the control group every two months.

Measurements

The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. The primary outcome is the change from baseline to 18 months in a global composite score combining several neuropsychological domains. Secondary outcomes include: cognitive change in each neuropsychological test, incident dementia, changes in blood and dementia-related biomarkers, changes in geriatric assessment including activities of daily living, frailty status and neuroimaging, and number of medications taken.

Conclusions

This trial that enlist the support of private enterprises will lead to the creation of new services for dementia prevention as well as to verify the effectiveness of multi-domain interventions for dementia prevention.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.14283/jpad.2021.29 and is accessible for authorized users.

Substantially Elevated Atherosclerotic Risks in Japanese Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Defined by the International Atherosclerosis Society

BACKGROUND

The International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS) has proposed "severe familial hypercholesterolemia" (FH) as a phenotype with the highest cardiovascular risk. However, whether this criteria could appropriately stratify a high-risk Japanese patient with FH remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in IAS-defined Japanese subjects with severe FH.

METHODS

This study analyzed 380 clinically diagnosed subjects with heterozygous FH without any history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Severe FH was defined as untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >400 mg/dL, >310 mg/dL plus 1 high-risk feature, or >190 mg/dL plus 2 high-risk features according to IAS-proposed statement. The occurrence of first and subsequent composite outcomes (cardiac [cardiac death + coronary artery disease + coronary revascularization] and noncardiac events [stroke + peripheral artery disease] was compared between subjects with severe (n = 135) and non-severe (n = 227) FH.

RESULTS

Severe FH was identified in 40.3% of study population. They had higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.001) and lipoprotein(a) (P = 0.03) levels. Moreover, they more frequently received high-intensity statin (P < 0.001), PCSK9 inhibitor (P < 0.001), and lipoprotein apheresis (P = 0.01) than nonsevere FH subjects did, which resulted in a lower on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of subjects with severe FH (113 ± 47.2 vs 130 ± 53.9 mg/dL; P = 0.007). However, during the 7.4-year observational period, subjects with severe FH exhibited a 9.3-, 15.4-, and 5.9-fold greater risk for first composite (P < 0.001), cardiac (P < 0.001), and noncardiac outcomes (P = 0.02), respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model consistently revealed the 7.8- and 7.9-fold elevated risks of first (P < 0.001) and of subsequent (P < 0.001) composite outcomes in subjects with severe FH.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese subjects with severe FH present profound risks of both first and subsequent atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in the primary prevention settings. These findings support the clinical applicability of IAS-defined severe FH in Japanese patients, which identifies those who require further stringent antiatherosclerotic management.