Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of sedation with midazolam and remimazolam for colorectal endoscopy.

Methods

This single-center, two-arm, post-hoc analysis of the REM-IICTJP01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of remimazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation. We enrolled 40 and 208 patients who underwent colonoscopy under remimazolam and midazolam sedation, respectively, during the same period. The primary outcome was the time from the end of the colonoscopy until discharge. The secondary outcomes included the time from the end of the colonoscopy until awakening, dosage, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to eliminate the effect of confounding factors.

Results

Thirty-seven patients in each group were matched. After propensity matching, the time to awakening after colonoscopy was 28.0 (13.0-37.0) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0-0) min in the remimazolam group; moreover, the time till discharge was 40.0 (35.0-46.5) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0-5.0) min in the remimazolam group, both of which were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group (p < 0.01). The number of additional doses was 0 (0-0) and 2 (1-3) in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively. The total dose was 2.0 (2.0-3.5) and 6.0 (5.0-7.0) mg in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Remimazolam yielded significantly faster times to awakening and discharge safely compared to midazolam.

Comparison of propofol-based sedation and midazolam sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy conducted by pediatric gastroenterologists

Objectives

The effectiveness and safety of propofol-based sedation and midazolam sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy were compared.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of pediatric patients (≤15 years old) who had undergone bidirectional endoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and colonoscopy by pediatric gastroenterologists. Demographic data, indications, sedatives/dosages, clinical outcomes, endoscopic findings, adverse events, and total patient time requirements (total time in which patients stay in our hospital) were compared in the two sedation groups.

Results

Ninety-one children (51 boys, 40 girls, mean age 13 years, range 9-15) treated at our hospital were enrolled. Propofol alone or in combination with midazolam and/or pentazocine was administered to 51 patients (propofol-based sedation group). Midazolam alone or in combination with pentazocine was administered to the other 40 patients (midazolam sedation group). In the propofol group, the following mean doses were used: propofol, 96 mg (range 40-145 mg); midazolam, 4.9 mg (range 3-5 mg); and pentazocine, 7.5 mg. In the midazolam group, the mean doses of midazolam and pentazocine were 6.2 mg (range 4-10 mg) and 15 mg, respectively. All procedures were successfully completed by pediatric gastroenterologists. The total procedure times and endoscopic findings were similar in the two groups, but the median patient time requirement in the propofol group was significantly shorter versus the midazolam group (7.3 h vs. 8.4 h, p < 0.001). No adverse events occurred in either group.

Conclusions

Propofol-based sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy was safely and effectively performed by pediatric gastroenterologists, and its patient time requirement was shorter than that for midazolam sedation.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous thiamylal in sedation for colonoscopy in children

Objectives

Since a standard sedation protocol for pediatric colonoscopy (CS) has not been established, evidence on optimal sedative agents is needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thiamylal in sedation for pediatric CS compared to midazolam.

Methods

Children from 7 to 16 years of age who underwent CS under sedation with intravenous thiamylal or midazolam at our hospital between June 2010 and March 2024 were included in this retrospective observational study. The primary outcome was the efficacy (success rate of CS without mid-awakening) of the drugs. Meanwhile, the secondary outcomes were the sedation level during CS, procedure time, recovery time, and adverse events related to sedation.

Results

Sixty children were included in the study. The success rate of CS without mid-awakening was significantly higher in the thiamylal group (90.6%) than in the midazolam group (64.3%; p = 0.03). The two groups had no significant differences in median sedation depth, procedure time, or recovery time. Adverse events related to sedation in thiamylal group (22%) and midazolam group (25%) were similar. No severe adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Intravenous thiamylal provides effective and safe sedation in children requiring CS, with little or no mid-awakening during the procedure.

A Blinded Crossover Study Design to Evaluate Midazolam as an Adjunct for Equine Standing Sedation for Routine Oral Examinations

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of including midazolam to a common equine standing sedation protocol for routine oral examination. Twelve horses underwent two examinations at least seven days apart. Horses were randomly assigned to receive midazolam intravenously (IV) (0.02mg/kg) or a placebo injection of saline (2-2.5mL IV). Five minutes later, detomidine (0.01mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.01mg/kg) were administered IV and horses were placed in standing stocks. A veterinarian blinded to the treatment protocol used a descriptive scoring system to assess degree of ataxia, acceptance of speculum, chewing on the speculum, headshaking, tongue movement, resistance to palpation, and eye appearance as related to the grimace score. During each examination, additional sedation of IV detomidine (0.006mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.006mg/kg) was administered at the discretion of the blinded practitioner to facilitate safe examination. At the second examination horses received the opposite treatment protocol and, following examination, a routine occlusal adjustment. Scores were compared using JMP software with a repeated measures mixed effects model, treatment as a fixed effect and horse and horse/treatment interaction as random effects. Significance was set at P<0.05. There were no significant differences in any of the single or overall sedation scores between treatment groups or within individual horses (P=0.3). Trends towards improvement of some assessed characteristics of sedation, including decreased tongue movement and less resistance to acceptance of speculum were observed. The use of midazolam may prove beneficial for routine oral examination, as well as other standing procedures, with no obvious undesired side effects.

Sedation of Adults with Orally Administered Midazolam in Dentistry - A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The use of midazolam (MZ) has increased in dentistry, but the effect in adults is sparsely studied. The aim of this study was to investigate doses, effects, and side effects of orally administered MZ as a sedative for adults in a dental care organization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective record review was performed including all adult patients in the dental care organization ≥20 years receiving MZ, identified through a logbook for addictive drugs, during 2020. From patients' records, the following data were extracted: age, gender, medical history, reason for sedation, performed treatments, doses, effects, and side effects of MZ.  Results: In total, 265 patients on 418 occasions had been sedated, which constituted 2.3 sedations per 1,000 visits and 3.3 sedations per 1,000 treated patients. Mean age was 40.8 years and 67.7% were females. The most common reason for sedation was anxiety. Mean dose in primary dental clinics was 7.9 mg and in specialist clinics, 6.8 mg (p < 0.001). Older patients (>70 years) had lower doses than younger (p < 0.001), while no difference was found between ages 55-70 years and those who were younger. Dental treatment was completed in 91.9% of occasions, and side effects were registered in 2.2%. Successful dental treatment was related to type of treatment performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedation is rarely used, particularly in primary dental care, and the use varies widely between clinics. MZ administered by dentists seems to be safe and effective. A sedation record should be used to make patient data such as weight and medical conditions available.

Effect of propofol versus midazolam on short-term outcomes in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury

Background

Propofol and midazolam are commonly used sedative drugs in mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). However, there is still a lack of relevant studies exploring the influence of midazolam and propofol on the prognosis of patients with Sepsis-associated Acute Kidney Injury (S-AKI).

Patients and methods

A statistical analysis was conducted on 3,745 patients with S-AKI in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. The patients' baseline characteristics were grouped based on the use of either propofol or midazolam as sedatives. Cox proportional hazards models, logistic regression models, and subgroup analyses were used to compare the effects of propofol and midazolam on the short-term prognosis of S-AKI patients, including 30-day mortality, ICU mortality, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

Results

In the statistical analysis, a total of 3,745 patients were included, with 649 patients using midazolam and 3,096 patients using propofol. In terms of the 30-day mortality, compared to patients using midazolam, S-AKI patients using propofol had a lower ICU mortality (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.74, p < 0.001), lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.67, p < 0.001), and shorter mechanical ventilation time (odds ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.88, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed lower survival probabilities in the midazolam group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that propofol was strongly protective of short-term prognosis in older, male, smaller SOFA score CCI score, no heart failure, and comorbid chronic kidney disease patients with S-AKI.

Conclusion

Compared to midazolam, propofol was considered a protective factor for short-term mortality risk and ICU mortality risk in S-AKI patients. Additionally, S-AKI patients using propofol had a lower risk of requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Overall, propofol may be more beneficial for the short-term prognosis of S-AKI patients compared to midazolam.

Incidences of Rocuronium Use during Anesthetic Induction in Adult Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery Using Supraglottic Airway Devices: A Retrospective Analysis

Background/Objectives: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are not usually necessary during the induction of general anesthesia in patients using supraglottic airway (SGA) devices. In this study, we assessed the incidences of rocuronium use in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia using SGA devices. Methods: From September 2022 to August 2023, the medical records of adult patients (≥19 years) who underwent orthopedic surgery using SGA devices were retrospectively investigated. The incidences of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction were analyzed according to the anesthetic induction drug. The association of rocuronium use during anesthesia was analyzed in terms of demographic (age, sex, height, and weight), surgical (surgical time), and anesthetic factors (premedication, anesthetic agent, anesthetic time). Results: In total, 321 patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction was 28.3%. In the subgroup analysis, patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (PPF) and remifentanil showed a markedly lower incidence (14.4%) than the other anesthetic groups. Premedication or short anesthetic duration was associated with lower incidences of rocuronium use. Demographic and other anesthetic factors did not seem to affect the incidences of rocuronium use during anesthesia. Conclusions: The incidence of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction with SGA devices was significantly lower with the PPF-TIVA compared to that using remimazolam-TIVA or inhalational anesthesia. Premedication with midazolam and shorter operation times were associated with a significantly lower incidence of rocuronium use.

Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for End-of-Life Sedation and Agitation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (The DREAMS Trial)

BACKGROUND

Sedation at the end of life is used to relieve distressing symptoms including agitation and delirium. Standard care may include infused benzodiazepines or antipsychotics. These agents often result in deep sedation with loss of interaction with loved ones, which may be distressing.

OBJECTIVE

The DREAMS (Dexmedetomidine for the Reduction of End-of-life Agitation and for optiMised Sedation) trial aimed to compare the sedative and antidelirium effects of the alpha-2 agonist dexmedetomidine, a novel palliative care sedative, compared with midazolam, a benzodiazepine when administered by subcutaneous infusion at the end of life, with doses of both agents targeting lighter, or potentially interactive sedation.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from adult inpatients admitted for end-of-life care under a palliative care team in regional New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria included patients older than 18 years, with a preference for lighter sedation at the end of life. Exclusion criteria included severe cardiac dysfunction (contraindication to dexmedetomidine). Participants consented and were placed on a treatment-pending list. Upon experiencing terminal deterioration, patients were randomized to either arm 1 (dexmedetomidine) or arm 2 (midazolam) as their treatment arm. These treatments were administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion. The level of consciousness and agitation of the patients were measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale-Palliative version and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Score. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale-Palliative version assessments were performed by both nursing and medical staff, while Memorial Delirium Assessment Score assessments were carried out by medical staff only. Families and patients were asked to complete, as able, a patient comfort assessment form, to gauge perceptions of distress. Data were collected and matched with the breakthrough medication doses administered, along with qualitative comments in the medical record. In addition, the study tracked symptoms and patient functional status that were recorded as part of the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaborative, a national tracking project for monitoring symptom outcomes in palliative care.

RESULTS

The DREAMS trial was funded in May 2020, approved by the ethics committee in November 2020, and started recruiting participants in May 2021. Data collection commenced in May 2021 and is anticipated to continue until December 2024. Publication of results is anticipated from 2024 to 2026.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence base for sedative dosing in palliative care for distress and agitation is not robust, with standard care based primarily on clinical experience and not robust scientific evidence. This study is important because it will compare a standard and a novel sedative used in end-of-life treatment. By assessing the potential efficacy and benefits of both, it seeks to optimize the quality of dying by providing targeted sedation that can improve the communication between dying patients and their loved ones.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12621000052831; https://uat.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380889.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/55129.

Effective doses of midazolam oral solution for the prevention of preoperative anxiety in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND

More than 60% children exhibit anxiety before undergoing an anesthetic-surgical procedure, particularly among pre-school paediatric patients. Oral midazolam can provide procedural sedation for children prior to anesthesia. However, extemporaneous solutions of midazolam are usually prepared from injectable drug solutions, leading to inconsistent efficacy due to variable preparation methods. Xiaoerjing® is the first commercially available oral formulation of midazolam for procedural sedation in children in China. Despite the recommended dosage range of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg, its effective dose is still largely unknown.

AIM

To determine the 95% effective dose (ED95) of midazolam oral solution (Xiaoerjing®) for alleviating preoperative anxiety in children prior to mask induction of general anesthesia.

DESIGN

The study included 61 children between the ages of 1 and 6 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The first patient received a single dose of 0.5 mg/kg midazolam oral solution, which was adjusted for subsequent patients using the biased coin design method based on their response to the previous dose. Doses were increased or decreased at the rate of 0.1 mg/kg. An effective response was defined as having a modified Ramsay sedation score ≥3a, separation anxiety score ≤2, and mask acceptance score ≤2 during inhalational anesthesia induction.

RESULTS

Fifty-six children were included in the final analysis. Of those, sedation was successful in 50 patients, with a median separation time of 15 (IQR: 25) min. Midazolam oral solution has an ED95 of 0.8254 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.6915-0.8700 mg/kg) for relieving preoperative anxiety in children. No adverse events occurred following drug administration.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam oral solution is a safe and effective medication for relieving preoperative anxiety in children. The ED95 of a single oral dose of midazolam oral solution is 0.8254 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.6915-0.8700 mg/kg).

A drug-drug interaction study and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to assess the effect of an oral 5-lipoxygenase activating protein inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam

AIMS

Early clinical studies have indicated that the pharmacokinetics of Atuliflapon (AZD5718) are time and dose dependent. The reason(s) for these findings is(are) not fully understood, but pre-clinical profiling suggests that time-dependent CYP3A4 inhibition cannot be excluded. In clinical practice, Atuliflapon will be co-administered with CYP3A4 substrates; thus, it is important to determine the impact of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics of a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam, and to explore if the time-/dose-dependent effect seen after repeated dosing could be an effect of change in CYP3A4 activity.

METHODS

Open-label, fixed-sequence study in healthy volunteers to assess the PK of midazolam alone and in combination with Atuliflapon. Fourteen healthy male subjects received single oral dose of midazolam 2 mg on days 1 and 7 and single oral doses of Atuliflapon (125 mg) from days 2 to 7. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to assess this drug-drug interaction.

RESULTS

Mean midazolam values of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) to infinity were increased by 39% and 56%, respectively, when co-administered with Atuliflapon vs. midazolam alone. The PBPK model predicted a 27% and 44% increase in AUC and a 23% and 35% increase in Cmax of midazolam following its co-administrations with two predicted therapeutically relevant doses of Atuliflapon.

CONCLUSIONS

Atuliflapon is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4; this was confirmed by the validated PBPK model. This weak inhibition is predicted to have a minor PK effect on CYP3A4 metabolized drugs.

Change of dexmedetomidine and midazolam concentrations by simultaneous injection in an in vitro extracorporeal circuit

PURPOSE

Patient sedation and analgesia are vital for safety and comfort during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, adsorption by the circuit may alter drug pharmaco-kinetics and remains poorly characterized. This study is the first to examine the concentrations of DEX and MDZ in the presence of drug-drug interactions using an in vitro extracorporeal circuit system that incorporates a polymer-coated polyvinyl chloride tube, but not a membrane oxygenator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nine in vitro extracorporeal circuits were prepared using polymer-coated PVC tubing. Once the circuits were primed and running, either a single drug or two drugs were injected as boluses into the circuit with three circuits per drug. Drug samples were drawn following injection at 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min and at 4, 12, and 24 h. They were then analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. When compared with an injection of DEX alone, the combination of DEX and MDZ is highly changed, with DEX and MDZ affecting the availability of free drugs in the circuit.

CONCLUSIONS

The change of DEX and MDZ concentrations was confirmed by a combination of both drugs as compared with either single-infusion DEX or MDZ in an in vitro extracorporeal circuit. Drug-drug interactions developed between DEX and MDZ through albumin in an extracorporeal circuit; as a result, the unbounded drugs might change in the circuit.

Value of Assessing 1-Hydroxymidazolam in Drug-Drug Interaction Studies with Midazolam as a Substrate of Cytochrome P450 3A

The purpose of this overview was to perform an exploratory analysis of in-house drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies conducted with investigational drugs and oral midazolam to assess the value of measuring 1-OH-midazolam (1-OHM) in such studies. The perpetrator effect of the investigational drugs on cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) was assessed by analyzing both midazolam and 1-OHM in plasma and evaluating their pharmacokinetic parameters. Given the almost exclusive metabolism of the parent drug by CYP3A to the main metabolite 1-OHM, an increase in midazolam and a decrease in 1-OHM exposure in the case of CYP3A inhibition caused by a perpetrator drug would be expected. The opposite would be anticipated in the case of CYP3A induction. For this analysis, the perpetrator potential of eight different investigational drugs was incorporated. Among the 10 studies included, the identified CYP3A inhibitors (n = 4) and inducers (n = 1) were classified based on the data generated with midazolam per se, with 1-OHM levels not contributing to the interpretation of the data as they did not corroborate the findings of the parent compound. Therefore, it was concluded that continued analysis of 1-OHM in plasma may be questionable as it does not add value to the interpretation of the results when performing CYP3A DDI studies with an investigational drug as a perpetrator.

Correlation Between Serum and CSF Concentrations of Midazolam and 1-Hydroxy-Midazolam in Critically Ill Neurosurgical Patients

BACKGROUND

Midazolam (MZ) is commonly used in critically ill neurosurgical patients. Neuro-penetration of MZ and its metabolite, 1-hydroxy-midazolam (1-OH-MZ), is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated correlations between serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of MZ and 1-OH-MZ and assessed implications on patient sedation.

METHODS

Adults in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) with external ventricular drains receiving MZ via continuous infusion were prospectively studied. Serum and CSF samples were obtained 12-24 h and 72-96 h after initiation, and concentrations were determined in duplicate by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Bivariate correlation analyses used Pearson coefficient.

RESULTS

A total of 31 serum and CSF samples were obtained from 18 subjects. At sampling, mean MZ infusion rate was 3.9 ± 4.4 mg/h, and previous 12-h cumulative dose was 51.4 ± 78.2 mg. Mean concentrations of MZ and 1-OH-MZ in serum and CSF were similar between timepoints. Similarly, ratios of 1-OH-MZ to MZ in serum and CSF remained stable over time. Serum MZ (126.2 ± 89.3 ng/mL) showed moderate correlation (r2 = 0.68, P < 0.001) with serum 1-OH-MZ (17.7 ± 17.6 ng/mL) but not CSF MZ (3.9 ± 2.5 ng/mL; r2 = 0.24, P = 0.005) or CSF 1-OH-MZ (2.5 ± 0.6 ng/mL; r2 = 0.47, P = 0.30). CSF MZ did not correlate with CSF 1-OH-MZ (r2 = 0.003, P < 0.001). Mean serum ratio of 1-OH-MZ to MZ (0.14 ± 0.2 ng/mL) did not correlate with CSF ratio (1.06 ± 0.83 ng/mL; r2 = 0.06, P = 0.19). Concentrations and ratios were unrelated to MZ infusion rate or 12-h cumulative dose. Sedation was weakly correlated with CSF 1-OH-MZ, but not with serum MZ, serum 1-OH-MZ, or CSF MZ.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Continuous infusions of MZ result in measurable concentrations of MZ and 1-OH-MZ in CSF; however, CSF concentrations of MZ and 1-OH-MZ poorly represent serum concentrations or dosages. Accumulation of MZ and 1-OH-MZ in serum or CSF over time was not evident. Concentrations of MZ and 1-OH-MZ do not predict sedation levels, reinforcing that pharmacodynamic assessments are warranted.

Usefulness of deep sedation with intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam in cardiac catheterization procedures for pediatric patients

Background

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective alpha 2 receptor agonist that has the advantage of causing less respiratory depression than other sedative agents. We evaluated the add-on effects of DEX on sedation among pediatric patients who received midazolam and pentazocine during cardiac catheterization.

Methods

120 cardiac catheterization procedures in 110 patients under deep sedation at Department of Pediatrics, Kanazawa University Hospital from January 2013 to August 2018: 63 procedures without DEX (i.e., non-DEX group) and 57 procedures with DEX (i.e., DEX group). Intravenous midazolam and pentazocine were used in both groups, and DEX without an initial loading dose (0.6 μg/kg/h) was used in the DEX group. We retrospectively investigated complications during catheterization, doses of sedative agents, and changes in vital signs.

Results

Hypoxemia requiring oxygen administration during catheterization tended to be higher in the non-DEX group than in the DEX group (4.8% vs. 0%). Additional dose of midazolam was significantly lower in the DEX group (median [IQR]: 0.05 mg/kg [0-0.11]) than in the non-DEX group [0.09 mg/kg (0-0.23), p = 0.0288]. The additional dose of midazolam in the non-DEX group with hypoxemia was significantly higher than the dose used in the non-DEX group without hypoxemia. No case of bradycardia below the criteria for bradycardia occurred and no serious complications occurred in the DEX group.

Conclusion

The use of intravenous DEX in combination with midazolam and pentazocine in pediatric cardiac catheterization may reduce the need for an additional dose of midazolam and may contribute to the prevention of airway complications associated with respiratory depression caused by sedative agents.

Comparison between Intramuscular and Intranasal Administration of Sedative Drugs Used for Piglet Castration

The aim of this study was to test the intranasal administration of different anaesthetics in piglets less than seven days of age undergoing castration for their suitability for providing good-quality sedation and short induction and recovery time with minimal stress. Azaperone alone at a high (5 mg/kg), medium (3 mg/kg) and low dosage (2 mg/kg) and in two combinations with either alfaxalone or midazolam were applied intramuscularly (i.m.) or intranasally (i.n.) to 120 healthy piglets. Compared to intramuscular application, intranasal application showed longer induction times, shorter recovery times and higher scores for defence and vocalisation. In conclusion, the intranasal protocols did not meet the requirements in all groups and their use can therefore not be recommended. A rapid induction phase and good quality of sedation could not be guaranteed.

An open-label study to explore the optimal design of CYP3A drug-drug interaction clinical trials in healthy Chinese people

A drug-drug interaction (DDI) trial of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) is a necessary part of early-phase trials of drugs mainly metabolized by this enzyme, but CYP3A DDI clinical trials do not have a standard design, especially for Chinese people. We aimed to offer specific recommendations for CYP3A DDI clinical trial design. This was an open, three-cycle, self-controlled study. Healthy subjects were given different administration strategies of CYP3A4 perpetrators. In each cycle, blood samples were collected before and within 24 h after the administration of midazolam, the CYP3A indicator substrate. The plasma concentrations of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was obtained using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. For CYP3A inhibition, itraconazole exposure with a loading dose could increase the exposure of midazolam by 3.21-fold based on maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), 8.37-fold based on area under the curve Pharmacology Research & Perspectives for review only from zero to the time point (AUC0-t), and 11.22-fold based on area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞). The data were similar for itraconazole pretreatment without a loading dose. For CYP3A induction, the exposure of rifampin for 7 days decreased the plasma concentration of midazolam ~0.27-fold based on Cmax, ~0.18-fold based on AUC0-t, and ~0.18-fold based on AUC0-∞. Midazolam exposure did not significantly change when the pretreatment of rifampin increased to 14 days. This study showed that itraconazole pretreatment for 3 days without a loading dose was enough for CYP3A inhibition, and pretreatment with rifampin for 7 days could induce near-maximal CYP3A levels.

Intravenous Sedation and Analgesia in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Retrospective Descriptive Study

Background Painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department often require the use of sedation and analgesia to ensure adequate pain control, a right of children and adolescents. This study aims to describe the procedural sedation and analgesia with intravenous medications performed in a pediatric emergency department. Methods This is a retrospective descriptive study of intravenous sedoanalgesia used in a pediatric emergency department of a level II district hospital in the Lisbon metropolitan area from October 2018 to December 2023. The type of intervention, drugs used, and adverse events were analyzed. Results A total of 615 patients were included in the study; 65.7% (n=404) were male with a median age of 6 years. The most frequently performed procedures were wound suturing (50.9%, n=313) and fracture reduction (36.3%, n=223). The drugs used for sedation and analgesia were ketamine (99.2%, n=610), midazolam (95.8%, n=589), propofol (1.6%, n=10), and morphine (0.5%, n=3). The majority of patients received midazolam and ketamine in association (93.8%, n=577). A total of 50 adverse events (8.1%) were recorded in 42 patients. The most frequent side effects were transient oxygen desaturation (2%, n=12), vomiting (1.5%, n=9), apnea/bradypnea (1%, n=6), and hallucinations (0.8%, n=5). The occurrence of adverse events was not dose-dependent (p >0.05). Respiratory complications resolved without requiring invasive interventions. Children were sedated by a pediatric intensivist in 68.1% (n=419), by a general pediatrician in 26.7% (n=164), and by a pediatric resident in 2% (n=12). Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that intravenous sedoanalgesia, particularly the combination of ketamine and midazolam, is a safe method for sedation in pediatric patients, with a low rate of adverse events.

Advantages of remimazolam for sedation in impacted tooth extraction

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the sedative effects of remimazolam and midazolam during impacted tooth extraction to provide a comfortable sedation treatment for patients with dental anxiety.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted, in which 60 patients undergoing intravenous sedation for mandibular impacted third molar extraction were evenly divided into either the remimazolam or midazolam group. Prior to receiving a nerve blocker, the patients were sedated with remimazolam or midazolam. Various parameters were recorded and analyzed, including onset time, awakening time, recovery time, modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS) scores before and after surgery, patient-doctor satisfaction levels, postoperative side effects within 24 hours, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at different time points.

RESULTS

Compared with the midazolam group, patients in the remimazolam group demonstrated significantly shorter onset, awakening, and recovery times as well as lower postoperative MDAS scores and higher levels of patient-doctor satisfaction. Fewer postoperative side effects were reported in the remimazolam group, although the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of remimazolam demonstrates faster onset and recovery, superior efficacy in reducing dental anxiety, and enhanced satisfaction among patients and doctors, thereby presenting distinct advantages for sedation treatment for patients with dental anxiety.

Non-operating Room Anesthesia (NORA): A Comprehensive Review of Monitored Anesthesia Care

Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is being increasingly employed in non-operative environments, particularly in the realms of endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures. This in-depth analysis delves into the essential components of MAC within these specific contexts, with a primary focus on ensuring patient safety, evaluating efficacy, and assessing procedural outcomes. It is a common practice in endoscopic procedures to necessitate sedation for the purpose of alleviating discomfort and anxiety, ultimately ensuring patient cooperation and the successful completion of the procedure. MAC, which entails the administration of sedatives and analgesics under the close supervision of an anesthesia professional, offers a personalized approach that carefully balances the depth of sedation with maintaining optimal patient safety standards. Within the domain of MRI procedures, where challenges such as claustrophobia and motion artifacts can significantly impact the process, MAC plays a crucial role in providing a controlled setting that not only enhances image quality but also improves patient compliance throughout the procedure. The review extensively investigates the various pharmacological agents commonly utilized in these scenarios, including but not limited to midazolam and fentanyl, shedding light on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties specific to these contexts. Furthermore, the critical role of the anesthesia provider in effectively managing potential complications, such as respiratory depression, hemodynamic instability, and allergic reactions, is thoroughly examined and discussed. The analysis extends to the implementation of MAC protocols, encompassing pre-procedural assessments, continuous intra-procedural monitoring, and comprehensive post-procedural care, all aimed at ensuring the best possible outcomes for patients. Additionally, the review delves into the economic considerations associated with MAC, taking into account its impact on procedural efficiency, healthcare costs, and patient throughput within these settings. By exploring current guidelines and recommendations established by professional societies such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), this review aims to provide a holistic understanding of the best practices in MAC for both endoscopy and MRI procedures. Through the synthesis of available evidence, the primary objective of this review is to contribute to informing clinical practices, enhancing patient safety measures, improving procedural success rates, and ultimately advocating for the broader adoption of monitored anesthesia care in diverse non-operative medical settings.

Propofol vs Midazolam As the Initial Sedation Strategy for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Single-Center Experience From Saudi Arabia

Background Propofol and midazolam are the most common sedative agents used in critical settings. Propofol and midazolam might have different mortality rates after sedation administration. Some studies mention that propofol is associated with a lower mortality rate than midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients, but other studies have contradicting results. This study aims to compare the 28-day mortality of propofol versus midazolam for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the National Guard Hospital Health Affairs (NGHA)-Western Region (WR). Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at (NGHA-WR) from March 2016 to July 2022. The inclusion criteria were those mechanically ventilated patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to ICU, where they were given either propofol or midazolam as the initial sedative agent. Those who signed DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or were contraindicated to sedation, such as allergy, were excluded from the study. Data were retrospectively retrieved and obtained from the Hospital Information System (HIS-BestCare, Saudi-Korean Health Informatics Company, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) and the Office of Data Intelligence. Results There is a significant difference between the type of sedation and the 28-day mortality rate. Midazolam was associated with higher rates of mortality - 104 (47.93%) when compared to propofol - three (14.29%). Also, patients who used midazolam had longer durations of ICU stay compared to propofol, with a mean number of 19.23 days vs 7.55 days, respectively. Conclusion There is a significant difference regarding the 28-day mortality between patients who were given propofol or midazolam as an initial sedative agent for mechanical ventilation ≥ 24 hours. Moreover, the use of propofol is associated with fewer days of being intubated or being in ICU when compared to midazolam.

Effectiveness of pharmacological procedural sedation in children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Management of primary healthcare and routine minor procedures for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be challenging; therefore, when behavioural strategies fail, sedative medications are often employed. We evaluated the effectiveness of the current pharmacological strategies for managing children with ASD.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current approaches for procedural sedation in children with ASD.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Dexmedetomidine, midazolam, propofol and chloral hydrate were the most efficient agents for successful procedures, while propofol had the highest number of adverse events. The most frequently used agents were dexmedetomidine and midazolam or a combination of the two, and the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine plus midazolam was superior to dexmedetomidine alone.

CONCLUSION

Multiple effective drug regimens exist for procedural sedation in children with ASD. These results could support the development of specific guidelines for procedural sedation in children with ASD.

Four-year review of safe and effective procedural sedation in neonates and young infants

Objectives

Newborns and small infants are unable to cooperate actively during diagnostic procedures; therefore, sedation is often employee to maintain immobilization and obtain high-quality images. However, these procedures are often indicated in sick, vulnerable, or hemodynamically unstable neonates and young infants, which raises the associated risks of sedation. This study summarizes our 4-year of experience with safe and effective procedural sedation in this vulnerable population.

Study design

This retrospective study analyzed data on neonates and young infants who underwent non-painful diagnostic procedures from December 2019 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into the neonate (aged≦ 28 days) and the young infant (29 days ≦ aged ≦ 90 days) groups.

Results

Non-pharmacological strategies, including sleeping naturally, swaddling/facilitated tucking, non-nutritive sucking, and skin-to-skin care, can achieve a success rate for sedation about 98.4%. In terms of pharmacological methods, our institution primarily utilizes chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in neonates and young infants undergoing non-painful diagnostic procedures. Midazolam serves as an alternative sedative. Chloral hydrate alone demonstrated a 92.5% success rate on the first attempt, compared to midazolam alone, with an 85.11% success rate. Neonates experienced a higher incidence of adverse events during sedation compared to young infants.

Conclusion

This study reviews our 4-year experience with procedural sedation in neonates and young infants. Chloral hydrate demonstrated a high degree of safety and efficacy in this population. However, supervision by skilled medical personnel and extended observation is required. In our institution, the experience with midazolam is limited in this population, and further research is warranted to establish its safety and efficacy. Non-pharmacological strategies can achieve an acceptable rate of sedation success, which can be used based on patient's tolerance.

Midazolam Indications and Dosing in Palliative Medicine: Results from a Multinational Survey

Despite sparse evidence and limited guidance on indications, use, and dosing, midazolam is widely used in palliative care. We aimed to describe and compare the use of midazolam in three different countries to improve clinical practice in palliative care. We performed an online survey among palliative care physicians in Norway, Denmark, and the United Kingdom (UK). The focus was indications, dosing, administration, and concomitant drugs. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the respective national palliative medicine associations. The total response rate was 9.4%. Practices in the UK, Norway, and Denmark were overall similar regarding the indications of midazolam for anxiety, dyspnoea, and pain treatment in combination with opioids. However, physicians in the UK used a higher starting dose for anxiety, dyspnoea, and pain treatment compared to Norway and Denmark, as well as a higher maximum dose. Danish physicians preferred, to a higher degree, on-demand midazolam administration. Despite practice similarities in the UK, Norway, and Denmark, differences exist for midazolam dosing and administration in palliative medicine. We demonstrated a lack of consensus on how midazolam should be used in palliative care, setting the stage for future studies on the topic.

Potential for Drug Repositioning of Midazolam as an Inhibitor of Inflammatory Bone Resorption

Drug repositioning is a method for exploring new effects of existing drugs, the safety and pharmacokinetics of which have been confirmed in humans. Here, we demonstrate the potential drug repositioning of midazolam (MDZ), which is used for intravenous sedation, as an inhibitor of inflammatory bone resorption. We cultured a mouse macrophage-like cell line with or without MDZ and evaluated its effects on the induction of differentiation of these cells into osteoclasts. For in vivo investigations, we administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS) together with MDZ (LPS+MDZ) to the parietal region of mice and evaluated the results based on the percentage of bone resorption and calvaria volume. Furthermore, we examined the effects of MDZ on the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells and on its signaling pathway. MDZ inhibited osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption activity. In animal studies, the LPS+MDZ group showed a decreasing trend associated with the rate of bone resorption. In addition, the bone matrix volume in the LPS+MDZ group was slightly higher than in the LPS only group. MDZ inhibited osteoclast differentiation by decreasing ROS production and thereby negatively regulating the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Thus, we propose that MDZ could potentially be used for treating inflammatory bone resorption, for example, in periodontal disease.

Comparison of Fentanyl With Midazolam As Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Sections: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia stands as a cornerstone for patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), offering advantages like faster onset and high block density. Levobupivacaine, known for its high potency and long-acting nature, has a slower onset. The safety of intrathecal fentanyl or midazolam is evaluated as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in parturients. This study aims to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by fentanyl or midazolam added to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in elective cesarean sections. Secondary objectives include evaluating the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Identifying the more effective adjuvant will help optimize spinal anesthesia protocols, improve postoperative outcomes, and enhance patient comfort and recovery. Methods This study was conducted at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, India, over six months (May 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A total of 90 patients undergoing elective LSCS received spinal anesthesia in a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Patients were allocated to three groups: Group A received levobupivacaine with fentanyl, Group B received levobupivacaine with midazolam, and Group C received levobupivacaine with normal saline. Block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and complications were assessed. Assessments were conducted at specified time points: intraoperatively, every five minutes for the first 30 minutes, every 10 minutes for the next hour, every two hours for six hours, and every four hours up to 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical analysis utilized one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Group B (levobupivacaine with midazolam) exhibited a shorter time to sensory block onset (88 seconds) compared to Groups A and C (both 145 seconds) (p < 0.001). Group A (levobupivacaine with fentanyl) showed a shorter time to maximum motor block (p = 0.045) than Groups B and C. The sensory block duration was significantly longer in Group A (127.5 minutes) compared to Group B (60 minutes) and Group C (69 minutes) (p < 0.001). Motor block duration was also prolonged in Group A (251 minutes) compared to Group B (147 minutes) and Group C (177 minutes) (p = 0.045). The first analgesic requirement was delayed in Group A (248 minutes), whereas Groups B (115 minutes) and C (90 minutes) (p < 0.001) required more frequent analgesia. Group A experienced a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion Midazolam accelerated sensory block onset, while fentanyl prolonged anesthesia duration without significantly affecting motor block. Fentanyl delayed the first analgesic requirement, whereas midazolam reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering.