Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia

OBJECTIVES

To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis.

DESIGN

Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis.

SETTING

Virginia hospitals performing HTx.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Retrospective Comparison of Recombinant Activated Factor VII Versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Cardiac Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidences of postoperative thrombotic complications, transfusion of blood products, and chest tube output in congenital cardiac surgical patients who received either recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC).

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study.

SETTING

Patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium databases, as well as from manual chart review. Adjusted p values were obtained from multivariate regression using age (days), surgeon (number), cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes), and need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (yes/no). A total of 55 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group, and 89 in the rFVIIa group. The median dose of rFVIIa was 77 mcg/kg (46-88), and the median dose of 4F-PCC was 31 IU/kg (24-43). The incidences of thrombotic complications were 8% in the 4F-PCC group and 30% in the rFVIIa group (adjusted p = 0.023). No difference was reported between the groups regarding chest tube output on days 1 and 2 or transfusion of blood products. Using a sensitivity analysis with propensity matching, the incidence of thrombosis was 10% in the 4F-PCC group (n = 38), and 31% in the rFVIIa group (n = 39) (p = 0.036). No difference was reported in terms of bleeding or transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggested that the administration of rFVIIa was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic complications when compared to 4F-PCC, without benefits in terms of bleeding and transfusions.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of eptacog beta (coagulation factor VIIa [recombinant]-jncw) for the treatment of hemophilia A and B with inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Bypassing agents (BPAs) are used to treat acute bleeding episodes, manage bleeding during perioperative care, and prophylactically minimize bleed occurrence in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors (PwHABI). However, the effectiveness of BPAs that have been prescribed for the last several decades can be variable, motivating the development of a new recombinant activated factor VII, eptacog beta.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers key eptacog beta findings from phase 1b and phase 3 (PERSEPT) clinical trials, which formed the basis for its regulatory approval to treat PwHABI ages 12 and older. Descriptions of eptacog beta structure and glycosylation profile, mechanism of action, preclinical study results, and cost analyses are also presented.

EXPERT OPINION

PwHABI have had only two options for bleed treatment for the past several decades. With its distinct glycosylation profile, eptacog beta offers a novel therapy aiming to improve upon BPAs currently in use, providing an option with more than one dosing regimen and a rapid response that allows most bleeds to be treated with just one dose. This has become particularly important given the use of subcutaneous medications (e.g., emicizumab) for prophylaxis of bleeding. Clinicians should consider eptacog beta as a BPA for all PwHABI.

COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONCENTRATE OF ALL PROTHROMBIN COMPLEX FACTORS WITH RECOMBINANT HUMAN COAGULATION FACTOR VIIa IN THE TREATMENT OF BLEEDING AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY

OBJECTIVE

Aim: The authors evaluated the effectiveness of treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in patients with massive postoperative bleeding that could not be controlled with traditional therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: In the period from 2020 to 2021, recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa was administered to 18 patients after cardiac surgery (group I), while the concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors was administered to 16 patients postoperatively (group II). During this period, 647 patients were operated on. The patients had normal coagulation screening tests (APTT, INR, TT, fibrinogen level, and PLT level) before surgery. Mean blood loss before and after administration of eptacog alfa and the total prothrombin complex concentrate was assessed. The mean dose of eptacog alfa was 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., and the total prothrombin complex factor concentrate dose was 14.17 mcg/kg b.w. After transfusion with red blood cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate, in the absence of improvement in the dynamics of postoperative drainage, it was decided to include recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa or a concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in the treatment.

RESULTS

Results: After administration of recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa at a dose of 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients, but the remaining 6 patients required reoperation due to persistently high drainage. The decision to perform a rethoracotomy was made by a team of cardiothoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists, taking into account the dynamics of drainage (bleeding) and the hemodynamic stability of the patient. After the administration of concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors at a dose of 14.17 U/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients. Four patients required reoperation due to persistent bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors is effective and safe for cardiac surgery patients.

The Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Patients with Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia

Platelet transfusion is the standard treatment to control or prevent bleeding in patients with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (GT), but platelets are often unavailable. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an effective alternative to platelets in patients with GT with past/present refractoriness to platelet transfusions and antibodies to platelets. However, there is an unmet need for an alternative to platelets in patients without antibodies. This report summarizes evidence of efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with GT without refractoriness or antibodies to platelets from three different sources: the Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia Registry (GTR), published literature (January 01, 1999 to December 01, 2017), and the Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database. In the GTR, 133 patients received rFVIIa for the treatment of 333 bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in 157 surgical procedures. Overall efficacy rates were 79 and 88%, respectively, in patients treated for bleeding episodes or for the prevention of bleeding during surgery; effectiveness was generally similar across refractoriness/antibody status categories. Median dose per infusion of rFVIIa was close to that recommended for patients with GT (90 µg/kg). Data from 14 published case reports also demonstrated that rFVIIa is effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with GT without antibodies to platelets. Analysis of adverse events reported in GTR and in Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database did not raise any new safety concerns. These data supported the label extension of rFVIIa to include cases where platelets are not readily available, which was approved by the European Medicines Agency in December 2018.

Safety analysis of rFVIIa with emicizumab dosing in congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors: Experience from the HAVEN clinical program

BACKGROUND

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; eptacog alfa activated, NovoSeven® , Novo Nordisk A/S) is a bypassing agent used in congenital hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Emicizumab (Hemlibra® ; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd) is a recombinant, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody used for routine prophylaxis in patients with congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors. Concomitant use of the hemostatic agents rFVIIa and emicizumab carries a theoretical increased risk of thrombotic complications. Roche and Novo Nordisk collaboratively analyzed all available data on the use of rFVIIa in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis in the Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Emicizumab Versus no Prophylaxis in Hemophilia A Participants With Inhibitors (HAVEN) clinical development program.

OBJECTIVE

Obtain further insights into the concomitant clinical use and safety of rFVIIa and emicizumab.

METHODS

The initial individual rFVIIa dose, dosing intervals and cumulative dosing were evaluated in the HAVEN 1, HAVEN 2, and HAVEN 4 trials. All adverse events reported in each of the three trials in patients treated with rFVIIa, including available narratives, were assessed.

RESULTS

The vast majority of bleeds occurred in HAVEN 1. When rFVIIa was used to treat a bleeding episode, a 100 ± 20 μg/kg dose was used to initiate treatment in the majority of cases. The dosing interval, as well as cumulative dosing were consistent with prescribing information and current practice. No serious adverse events, no thrombotic microangiopathy cases, or thromboembolic events were assessed to be associated with rFVIIa when used in conjunction with emicizumab prophylaxis in the HAVEN trials.

CONCLUSION

rFVIIa use in the context of emicizumab prophylaxis does not change the rFVIIa safety profile as described in the product information.

Thrombogenic Side-Effects of Recombinant Factor VIIa after use in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used ‘off licence’ to successfully treat bleeding and reduce transfusion requirements in complex cardiac surgery. However, concerns over thrombogenic side-effects have limited but not excluded its use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

We present two cases of CABG (one ‘on pump’ and one ‘off pump’) which were complicated by intraoperative aortic dissection and severe bleeding. In both cases the bleeding was successfully treated with rFVIIa. However the first case suffered from severe postoperative arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and worsening left ventricular dysfunction, suggesting graft patency may have been impaired, whereas the second case remained symptom-free suggesting graft patency was unaffected by the use of rFVIIa. If rFVIIa is needed to treat bleeding during CABG surgery, it may be more appropriate to administer smaller, repeated doses to minimize the risk of thrombosis and early graft failure.

Phase 1, single-dose escalating study of marzeptacog alfa (activated), a recombinant factor VIIa variant, in patients with severe hemophilia

Essentials Marzeptacog alfa (activated) [MarzAA] is a novel variant of activated human factor VII. A phase 1 dose escalation trial of MarzAA was conducted in subjects with severe hemophilia. MarzAA was safe and tolerated at intravenous doses up to 30 μg kg-1 Data observed support further trials for hemophilia patients with inhibitors to factors VIII/IX.

SUMMARY

Background Marzeptacog alfa (activated) (MarzAA), a new recombinant activated human factor VII (rFVIIa) variant with four amino acid substitutions, was developed to provide increased procoagulant activity and a longer duration of action in people with hemophilia. Objectives To investigate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single ascending intravenous bolus doses of MarzAA in non-bleeding patients with congenital hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Methods This international, phase 1, open-label study (NCT01439971) enrolled males aged 18-64 years with severe hemophilia A or B, with or without FVIII or FIX inhibitors. Subjects were assigned to single-dose MarzAA cohorts (0.5, 4.5, 9, 18 or 30 μg kg-1 ). Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose, and subjects were monitored for 60 days postdose. Safety endpoints included adverse events, vital sign changes, electrocardiograms, laboratory abnormalities, and immunogenicity; secondary endpoints included evaluation of PK and PD. Results Overall, in 25 patients, MarzAA was well tolerated at all dose levels tested, and was not associated with dose-limiting toxicity. No treatment-emergent severe or serious adverse events occurred. MarzAA showed linear dose-response PK across the 4.5-30 μg kg-1 dose range, with a terminal half-life of ⁓ 3.5 h. Dose-dependent shortening of the activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time, and evidence of an increase in peak thrombin as determined with a thrombin generation assay, were observed at all doses. Conclusions MarzAA was tolerated at doses up to 30 μg kg-1 . The safety profile and pharmacological effects observed support further clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilic patients with inhibitors.

Lessons from a systematic literature review of the effectiveness of recombinant factor VIIa in acquired haemophilia

To conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting efficacy and safety of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for the treatment of bleeding in acquired haemophilia and, if data permitted, undertake a meta-analysis of the current evidence. MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for all studies on rFVIIa treatment in acquired haemophilia. Heterogeneity of included studies was measured using the inconsistency index (I²). Of the 2353 publications screened, 290 potentially relevant references were identified: 12 studies published in 32 publications met inclusion criteria. In total, 1244 patients and 1714 bleeds were included (671 patients received rFVIIa treatment for 1063 bleeds). In seven of 12 studies, the initial dose of Recombinant FVIIa was 90 ± 10 μg/kg. Recombinant FVIIa was used as first-line therapy in the majority of cases. Median number of doses administered ranged from 10 to 28. Between 68 and 74% of bleeds were spontaneous, whereas 4-50% were traumatic. Thirty-nine to 90% of bleeds were severe. Haemostatic effectiveness was > 90% in 5/6 studies for both patient and bleed level. Recombinant FVIIa had a favourable safety profile with low risk of general adverse events and thromboembolic-associated events. The heterogeneity of the studies and data precluded a meta-analysis. Recombinant FVIIa demonstrated effectiveness for the treatment of bleeds and had a good safety profile. It is apparent from these data that there is a need for more standardised measures of clinical effectiveness in acquired haemophilia to enable comparison and pooling of results in the future.

Haemostatic therapies for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Outcome after spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is influenced by haematoma volume; up to one-third of ICHs enlarge within 24 hours of onset. Early haemostatic therapy might improve outcome by limiting haematoma growth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006, and last updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To examine 1) the effectiveness and safety of individual classes of haemostatic therapies, compared against placebo or open control, in adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, and 2) the effects of each class of haemostatic therapy according to the type of antithrombotic drug taken immediately before ICH onset (i.e. anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or none).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register, CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 11, MEDLINE Ovid, and Embase Ovid on 27 November 2017. In an effort to identify further published, ongoing, and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCT), we scanned bibliographies of relevant articles and searched international registers of RCTs in November 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any haemostatic intervention (i.e. pro-coagulant treatments such as coagulation factors, antifibrinolytic drugs, or platelet transfusion) for acute spontaneous ICH, compared with placebo, open control, or an active comparator, reporting relevant clinical outcome measures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and contacted corresponding authors of eligible RCTs for specific data if they were not provided in the published report of an RCT.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs involving 1732 participants. There were seven RCTs of blood clotting factors versus placebo or open control involving 1480 participants, three RCTs of antifibrinolytic drugs versus placebo or open control involving 57 participants, one RCT of platelet transfusion versus open control involving 190 participants, and one RCT of blood clotting factors versus fresh frozen plasma involving five participants. We were unable to include two eligible RCTs because they presented aggregate data for adults with ICH and other types of intracranial haemorrhage. We identified 10 ongoing RCTs. Across all seven criteria in the 12 included RCTs, the risk of bias was unclear in 37 (44%), high in 16 (19%), and low in 31 (37%). Only one RCT was at low risk of bias in all criteria.In one RCT of platelet transfusion versus open control for acute spontaneous ICH associated with antiplatelet drug use, there was a significant increase in death or dependence (modified Rankin Scale score 4 to 6) at day 90 (70/97 versus 52/93; risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.61, one trial, 190 participants, moderate-quality evidence). All findings were non-significant for blood clotting factors versus placebo or open control for acute spontaneous ICH with or without surgery (moderate-quality evidence), for antifibrinolytic drugs versus placebo (moderate-quality evidence) or open control for acute spontaneous ICH (moderate-quality evidence), and for clotting factors versus fresh frozen plasma for acute spontaneous ICH associated with anticoagulant drug use (no evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on moderate-quality evidence from one trial, platelet transfusion seems hazardous in comparison to standard care for adults with antiplatelet-associated ICH.We were unable to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy and safety of blood clotting factors for acute spontaneous ICH with or without surgery, antifibrinolytic drugs for acute spontaneous ICH, and clotting factors versus fresh frozen plasma for acute spontaneous ICH associated with anticoagulant drug use.Further RCTs are warranted, and we await the results of the 10 ongoing RCTs with interest.

Factor XIII cotreatment with hemostatic agents in hemophilia A increases fibrin α-chain crosslinking

Essentials Factor XIII (FXIII)-mediated fibrin crosslinking is delayed in hemophilia. We determined effects of FXIII cotreatment with hemostatic agents on clot parameters. FXIII cotreatment accelerated FXIII activation and crosslinking of fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin. These data provide biochemical rationale for FXIII cotreatment in hemophilia.

SUMMARY

Background Hemophilia A results from the absence, deficiency or inhibition of factor VIII. Bleeding is treated with hemostatic agents (FVIII, recombinant activated FVII [rFVIIa], anti-inhibitor coagulation complex [FEIBA], or recombinant porcine FVIII [rpFVIII]). Despite treatment, some patients have prolonged bleeding. FXIII-A2 B2 (FXIII) is a protransglutaminase. During clot contraction, thrombin-activated FXIII (FXIIIa) crosslinks fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin, which promotes red blood cell retention and increases clot stability and weight. We hypothesized that FXIII cotreatment in hemophilia would accelerate FXIII activation, leading to increased fibrin crosslinking. Methods FVIII-deficient plasma and whole blood were clotted with or without hemostatic agents (FVIII, rFVIIa, FEIBA, or recombinant B-domain-deleted porcine FVIII [rpFVIII]) and/or FXIII. The effects on FXIII activation, thrombin generation, fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin crosslinking, clot formation and clot weight were measured by western blotting, calibrated automated thrombography, thromboelastography, and clot contraction assays. Results As compared with FVIII-treated hemophilic plasma, FVIII + FXIII cotreatment accelerated FXIIIa formation without increasing thrombin generation. As compared with buffer-treated or FXIII-treated hemophilic plasma, FVIII treatment and FVIII + FXIII cotreatment increased the generation and amount of crosslinked fibrin, including α-chain-rich high molecular weight species and crosslinked α2 -antiplasmin. In the presence of FVIII inhibitors, as compared with hemostatic treatments (rFVIIa, FEIBA, or rpFVIII) alone, FXIII cotreatment increased whole blood clot weight. Conclusion In hemophilia A plasma and whole blood, FXIII cotreatment with hemostatic agents accelerated FXIIIa formation, increased the generation and amount of fibrin α-chain crosslinked species, accelerated α2 -antiplasmin crosslinking, and increased clot weight. FXIII cotreatment with hemostatic therapy may augment hemostasis through increased crosslinking of fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin.

Hemophilia and inhibitors: current treatment options and potential new therapeutic approaches

The immune response to infused factor concentrates remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. This review focuses on current treatment options and novel therapies currently in clinical trials. After a brief review of immune tolerance regimens, the focus of the discussion is on preventing bleeding in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. Recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates are the mainstays in treating bleeds in patients with inhibitors. Both agents have been shown to reduce bleeding episodes to a similar degree when infused prophylactically; however, individual patients may respond better to one agent over the other at any given time. The international immune tolerance trial revealed that a high-dose factor VIII regimen provided significantly better bleeding protection than the low-dose regimen. Given the high cost of treatment and the potential for a high-dose immune tolerance regimen to prevent bleeding in some patients, we discuss how we treat patients to maximize the prevention of bleeds while minimizing cost. Novel approaches to treatment of these patients are in development. These include agents that mimic factor VIII or augment thrombin generation by bypassing the inhibitor, as well as agents that inhibit the natural anticoagulants.

Control of Bleeding Caused by Thrombocytopenia Associated With Hematologic Malignancy: An Audit of the Clinical Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII

This paper presents an analysis of 24 cases in which recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was used in the management of hemorrhage in patients with thrombocytopenia associated with hematologic malignancies. This is the largest case aggregation to date and focuses on preliminary experience in the off-label use of this hemostatic agent. Data were extracted from the international, Internet-based registry, www.haemostasis.com, accessed in September 2003. The search results were manually cross-checked against monthly summary reports. The physicians providing the cases were contacted individually to approve the use of their cases, supply any information missing from the database, and validate the data already held. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, B-cell or T-cell lymphoma, or aplastic anemia received rFVIIa at total doses of between 18 and 1040 μg/kg body weight. Bleeding stopped in 11 of 24 (46%) patients, markedly decreased in 8 of 24 (33%) patients, and decreased in 4 of 24 (17%) patients. In most patients, the response was achieved within 2.5 hours of administration of rFVIIa. The use of rFVIIa was generally well tolerated—1 case of ischemic stroke was considered to be possibly related to rFVIIa administration, but this has yet to be confirmed. A review of these 24 cases submitted to the www.haemostasis.com database suggests that rFVIIa is beneficial in the management of hemorrhage in patients with thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancies. This warrants further investigation in rigorously controlled clinical trials.

Systematic monitoring of hemostatic management in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor in the perioperative period using rotational thromboelastometry

BACKGROUND

The management of hemophilia A (HA) patients with inhibitors on bypassing therapy remains challenging. In particular, the monitoring of treatment is restricted by the limited reliability and lack of standardization of currently available methods to evaluate the physiological effects of various hemostatic agents. Accurate monitoring of these patients is particularly important in surgical situations. The recently developed comprehensive coagulation assays, including rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), may be useful in these circumstances.

OBJECTIVE

We have attempted to establish a systematic monitoring protocol using ROTEM (NATEM triggered by CaCl2 ) to evaluate the choice and effectiveness of different bypassing agents in the perioperative period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The hemostatic effects of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) were determined using a three-step procedure (spike, preoperative and perioperative) in eight patients with HA inhibitor admitted for elective surgery and assessed for individually tailored therapy. The ROTEM parameters demonstrated similar improvement to approximately normal levels at each stage after treatment with rFVIIa. Results in the presence of aPCC showed a marked improvement in the spike data, although this appeared to be different from those in the preoperative and perioperative assessments. The information derived from the spike and preoperative findings provided a useful guide for establishing an effective dose of therapeutic material, and facilitated good hemostatic control during and after surgery in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that this systematic analysis using ROTEM could provide a promising strategy for the use of bypassing therapy in HA patients with inhibitor.

Risk of thromboembolic events after protocolized warfarin reversal with 3-factor PCC and factor VIIa

Bleeding events and life-threatening hemorrhage are the most feared complications of warfarin therapy. Prompt anticoagulant reversal aimed at replacement of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors is essential to promote hemostasis. A retrospective cohort study of warfarin-treated patients experiencing a life-threatening hemorrhage treated with an institution-specific warfarin reversal protocol (postimplementation group) and those who received the prior standard of care (preimplementation group) was performed. The reversal protocol included vitamin K, 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant factor VIIa. Demographic and clinical information, anticoagulant reversal information, and all adverse events attributed to warfarin reversal were recorded. A total of 227 patients were included in final analysis, 109 in the preimplementation group and 118 in the postimplementation group. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both groups, with the exception of higher average Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in the postimplementation group (P = .0005). The most common indication for anticoagulation reversal was intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Prereversal international normalized ratios (INRs) were similar in both groups. Attainment of INR normalization to less than 1.4 was higher, and rebound INR was lower in the postimplementation group (P < .0001; P = .0013). Thromboembolic complications were significantly higher in the postimplementation group (P = .003). Elevated baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and mechanical valve as an indication for anticoagulation were independently associated with thrombotic complications (P = .005). A warfarin reversal protocol consisting of 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, recombinant factor VIIa, and vitamin K more consistently normalized INR values to less than 1.4 as compared to the prior standard of care in a diverse patient population. This success came at the cost of a 2-fold increase in risk of thromboembolic complications.

[Using recombinant activated blood coagulation factor VII for treatment of hemorrhagic syndrome in patients with thrombocytopenia]

The review deals with an analysis of the use of recombinant activated factor clotting VII (rFVIIa) for the treatment of hemorrhagic syndrome in patients with thrombocytopenia. The review discusses cases of rFVIIa use during bleeding of different localization and different invasive interventions, a frequency of thrombotic complications and causes of the rFVlIIa insufficiency.

Recombinant Factor VIIa: clinical applications for an intravenous hemostatic agent with broad-spectrum potential

Recombinant Factor VIIa (NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk) is a unique hemostatic agent with potential for broad-spectrum applications in bleeding patients with congenital and acquired bleeding abnormalities. At present, recombinant Factor VIIa is only approved for the treatment of hemophilia A and B patients who have acquired antibodies to Factors VIII and IX. However, the literature is rapidly expanding indicating that rFVIIa could benefit patients with bleeding due to a variety of etiologies. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these reports are case studies or small-series summaries, and are neither prospective nor controlled. Controlled trials are currently underway in several potential areas of application. While the possibility of thrombotic complications has been a clinical concern, safety data on patients treated to date have not revealed a significant problem. Expansion of the clinical applications for this interesting and important hemostatic agent are hampered by its expense, the limited scope of the US Food and Drug Administration approval for its use, and the absence of an appropriate laboratory monitoring assay.

40K glycoPEGylated, recombinant FVIIa: 3-month, double-blind, randomized trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy in hemophilia patients with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

A 40K glycoPEGylated, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) bypassing agent (N7-GP) with a prolonged half-life (15 h) compared with rFVIIa was developed as a potential candidate for bleed-preventive regimens in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of N7-GP in congenital hemophilia A and B patients with high-titer inhibitors.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this global, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, 25, 100 or 200 μg kg(-1)  N7-GP was administered intravenously once every second day during a 3-month, bleed-preventive regimen and compared with a preceding 3-month observation period with on-demand treatment of bleeds with rFVIIa. The primary endpoint was adverse events; secondary endpoints were evaluation of immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 23 patients were randomized and dosed (n = 8/7/8 for 25/100/200 μg kg(-1) ). N7-GP was well tolerated, with a low frequency of adverse events. No serious adverse events, immunogenic or thromboembolic events related to N7-GP were reported. The pharmacokinetic properties of N7-GP were similar to those reported in phase 1. The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) decreased in the treatment period vs. the observation period at all N7-GP dose levels. However, a dose-response relationship in the reduction could not be established in the N7-GP dose range evaluated. The ABR was also reduced at two dose levels during the last part of the observation period, and increased notably in the follow-up period irrespective of previous N7-GP dose. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00951405).

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study of the recombinant factor VIIa variant BAY 86-6150 in hemophilia

BACKGROUND

BAY 86-6150 is a new human recombinant factor VIIa variant developed for high procoagulant activity and longer action in people with hemophilia with inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BAY 86-6150 in non-bleeding hemophilia subjects.

METHODS

The study included non-bleeding men (18-65 years of age) with moderate or severe hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Sixteen subjects were randomized 3 : 1 to four cohorts of escalating doses of BAY 86-6150 (6.5, 20, 50 or 90 μg kg(-1) [n = 3 per cohort]) or placebo (n = 1 per cohort); an independent data-monitoring committee reviewed previous cohort data before the next dose escalation. Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose; subjects were monitored for 50 days postdose.

RESULTS

At the tested doses, BAY 86-6150 was not associated with clinically significant adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. BAY 86-6150 pharmacokinetics exhibited a linear dose response, with a half-life of 5-7 h. Subjects demonstrated consistent, dose-dependent thrombin generation ex vivo in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) (mean peak effect, 26-237 nm thrombin from 6.5 to 90 μg kg(-1)). Peak thrombin levels over time paralleled BAY 86-6150, with thrombin kinetics appearing to be slightly shorter; thus, circulating BAY 86-6150 retained activity. There were corresponding decreases in activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times. No subject developed de novo anti-BAY 86-6150 neutralizing antibodies during the 50-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first-in-human, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study, BAY 86-6150 was tolerated at the highest dose (90 μg kg(-1)), with no safety concerns. Safety and efficacy will be further evaluated in phase II/III studies.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of recombinant canine FVIIa in a study dosing one haemophilia A and one haemostatically normal dog

Recombinant human FVIIa (rhFVIIa) corrects the coagulopathy in hemophilia A and B as well as FVII deficiency. This is also the case in dogs until canine anti-human FVIIa antibodies develop (~2 weeks). Recombinant canine factor VIIa (rcFVIIa), successfully over-expressed by gene transfer in haemophilia dogs, has provided long-term haemostasis (>2 years). However, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of rcFVIIa after pharmacological administration have not been reported. We therefore wanted to explore the safety, PK and PD of rcFVIIa in dogs. A pilot study was set up to evaluate the safety as well as PK and PD of rcFVIIa after a single intravenous dose of 270 μg kg(-1) to one HA and one haemostatically normal dog and to directly compare rcFVIIa with rhFVIIa in these two dogs. Single doses of rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa were well tolerated. No adverse events were observed. Pharmacokinetic characteristics including half-life (FVIIa activity: 1.2-1.8 h; FVIIa antigen 2.8-3.7 h) and clearance were comparable for rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa. Kaolin-activated thromboelastography approached normal in the HA dog with the improvement being most pronounced after rcFVIIa. This study provided the first evidence that administering rcFVIIa intravenously is feasible, safe, well tolerated and efficacious in correcting the haemophilic coagulopathy in canine HA and that rcFVIIa exhibits pharmacokinetic characteristics comparable to rhFVIIa in haemophilic and haemostatically competent dogs. This strengthens the hypothesis that rcFVIIa can be administered to dogs to mimic the administration of rhFVIIa to humans.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of recombinant canine FVIIa in a study dosing one haemophilia A and one haemostatically normal dog

Recombinant human FVIIa (rhFVIIa) corrects the coagulopathy in hemophilia A and B as well as FVII deficiency. This is also the case in dogs until canine anti-human FVIIa antibodies develop (~2 weeks). Recombinant canine factor VIIa (rcFVIIa), successfully over-expressed by gene transfer in haemophilia dogs, has provided long-term haemostasis (>2 years). However, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of rcFVIIa after pharmacological administration have not been reported. We therefore wanted to explore the safety, PK and PD of rcFVIIa in dogs. A pilot study was set up to evaluate the safety as well as PK and PD of rcFVIIa after a single intravenous dose of 270 μg kg(-1) to one HA and one haemostatically normal dog and to directly compare rcFVIIa with rhFVIIa in these two dogs. Single doses of rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa were well tolerated. No adverse events were observed. Pharmacokinetic characteristics including half-life (FVIIa activity: 1.2-1.8 h; FVIIa antigen 2.8-3.7 h) and clearance were comparable for rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa. Kaolin-activated thromboelastography approached normal in the HA dog with the improvement being most pronounced after rcFVIIa. This study provided the first evidence that administering rcFVIIa intravenously is feasible, safe, well tolerated and efficacious in correcting the haemophilic coagulopathy in canine HA and that rcFVIIa exhibits pharmacokinetic characteristics comparable to rhFVIIa in haemophilic and haemostatically competent dogs. This strengthens the hypothesis that rcFVIIa can be administered to dogs to mimic the administration of rhFVIIa to humans.

[The "Seville" Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion. Sociedades españolas de Anestesiología (SEDAR), Medicina Intensiva (SEMICYUC), Hematología y Hemoterapia (AEHH), Transfusión sanguínea (SETS) Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH)]

The Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion (AABT) has been drawn up by a panel of experts from 5 scientific societies. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), Hematology and Hemotherapy (AEHH), Blood Transfusion (SETS) and Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) have sponsored and participated in this Consensus Document. Alternatives to blood transfusion have been divided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological, with 4 modules and 12 topics. The main objective variable was the reduction of allogenic blood transfusions and/or the number of transfused patients. The extent to which this objective was achieved by each AABT was evaluated using the Delphi method, which classifies the grade of recommendation from A (supported by controlled studies) to E (non-controlled studies and expert opinion). The experts concluded that most of the indications for AABT were based on middle or low grades of recommendation, "C", "D", or "E", thus indicating the need for further controlled studies.