Effects of Low-Dose Atorvastatin on Vascular Responses in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting

Background: The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-dose atorvastatin on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and endothelial function, and the secondary endpoint comprised restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Methods: Two hundred five consecutive patients (mean age, 60 years) undergoing PCI were prospectively randomized to usual therapy (control group, n = 100) or to 10 mg of atorvastatin daily plus usual therapy (statin group, n = 105). Carotid IMT, endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation [FMD] of the brachial artery), and coronary angiograms were taken before the study and 6 months after randomization. The 6-month follow-up measurements of the above factors were obtained in 83 patients (83%) of the control group and in 97 patients (92%) of the statin group.

Results: No significant differences were noted in the baseline clinical and angiographic findings in either group. FMD was significantly improved during the 6 months in the statin group (4.38% ± 1.7% vs 4.85% ± 1.6%, P = .003), but did not change in the control group. Carotid IMT did not show any significant changes at 6 months in either group. There was a trend in favor of statin in terms of restenosis rate (26.8% vs 36.1%, P = .177) and TLR rate (18.6% vs 25.3%, P = .274). The changes of FMD were significantly correlated with the changes of total cholesterol and the changes of low-density lipoprotein, respectively ( r= -0.336, P = .009, and r = -0.310, P = .046).

Conclusion: Low-dose atorvastatin reduces endothelial dysfunction as measured by FMD, which coincides with the beneficial effects on lipid profiles, and can decrease restenosis and TLR rate in patients undergoing PCI with stenting.

Alirocumab as Add-On to Atorvastatin Versus Other Lipid Treatment Strategies: ODYSSEY OPTIONS I Randomized Trial

CONTEXT

Despite current standard of care, many patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) still have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Alirocumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of adding alirocumab vs other common lipid-lowering strategies.

DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients (n = 355) with very high CVD risk and LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL or greater or high CVD risk and LDL-C of 100 mg/dL or greater on baseline atorvastatin 20 or 40 mg were randomized to one of the following: 1) add-on alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) sc; 2) add-on ezetimibe 10 mg/d; 3) double atorvastatin dose; or 4) for atorvastatin 40 mg regimen only, switch to rosuvastatin 40 mg. For patients not achieving protocol-defined LDL-C goals, the alirocumab dose was increased (blinded) at week 12 to 150 mg Q2W.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary end point was percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to 24 weeks (intent to treat).

RESULTS

Among atorvastatin 20 and 40 mg regimens, respectively, add-on alirocumab reduced LDL-C levels by 44.1% and 54.0% (P < .001 vs all comparators); add-on ezetimibe, 20.5% and 22.6%; doubling of atorvastatin dose, 5.0% and 4.8%; and switching atorvastatin 40 mg to rosuvastatin 40 mg, 21.4%. Most alirocumab-treated patients (87.2% and 84.6%) achieved their LDL-C goals. Most alirocumab-treated patients (86%) maintained their 75-mg Q2W regimen. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 65.4% of alirocumab patients vs 64.4% ezetimibe and 63.8% double atorvastatin/switch to rosuvastatin (data were pooled).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding alirocumab to atorvastatin provided significantly greater LDL-C reductions vs adding ezetimibe, doubling atorvastatin dose, or switching to rosuvastatin and enabled greater LDL-C goal achievement.

Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition by TA-8995 in patients with mild dyslipidaemia (TULIP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidaemia remains a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and additional lipid-modifying treatments are warranted to further decrease the cardiovascular disease burden. We assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a novel cholesterol esterase transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor TA-8995 in patients with mild dyslipidaemia.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2 trial, we recruited patients (aged 18-75 years) from 17 sites (hospitals and independent clinical research organisations) in the Netherlands and Denmark with fasting LDL cholesterol levels between 2·5 mmol/L and 4·5 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol levels between 0·8 and 1·8 mmol/L and triglyceride levels below 4·5 mmol/L after washout of lipid-lowering treatments. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive one of the following nine treatments: a once a day dose of 1 mg, 2·5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg TA-8995 or matching placebo; 10 mg TA-8995 plus 20 mg atorvastatin; 10 mg TA-8995 plus 10 mg rosuvastatin or 20 mg atorvastatin or 10 mg rosuvastatin alone. We overencapsulated statins to achieve masking. The primary outcome was percentage change in LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol from baseline at week 12, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970215.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 15, 2013, and Jan 10, 2014, 364 patients were enrolled. At week 12, LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by 27·4% in patients assigned to the 1 mg dose, 32·7% in patients given the 2·5 mg dose, 45·3% in those given the 5 mg dose, and 45·3% in those given the 10 mg dose (p<0·0001). LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by 68·2% in patients given 10 mg TA-8995 plus atorvastatin, and by 63·3% in patients given rosuvastatin plus 10 mg TA-8995 (p<0·0001). A daily dose of 1 mg TA-8995 increased HDL cholesterol levels by 75·8%, 2·5 mg by 124·3%, 5 mg by 157·1%, and 10 mg dose by 179·0% (p<0·0001). In patients receiving 10 mg TA-8995 and 20 mg atorvastatin HDL cholesterol levels increased by 152·1% and in patients receiving 10 mg TA-8995 and 10 mg rosuvastatin by 157·5%. We recorded no serious adverse events or signs of liver or muscle toxic effects.

INTERPRETATION

TA-8995, a novel CETP inhibitor, is well tolerated and has beneficial effects on lipids and apolipoproteins in patients with mild dyslipidaemia. A cardiovascular disease outcome trial is needed to translate these effects into a reduction of cardiovascular disease events.

FUNDING

Dezima.

The effects of atorvastatin on antioxidant/antiinflammatory properties of HDLs in hypercholesterolemics

BACKGROUND/AIM

Hypercholesterolemia is characterized by changes in lipid profile, nitric oxide pathway, and oxidative stress markers, but functions of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were not well established in hypercholesterolemic subjects treated with atorvastatin. In this study, we aimed to evaluate effects of atorvastatin treatment on functionality of HDL, oxidative stress, and endothelial functions in hypercholesterolemic subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (20 females, 10 males) aged from 40 to 60 years and diagnosed as hypercholesterolemic were included. Patients were treated with 10 mg/day atorvastatin for 3 months. Markers of endothelial functions, namely asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), homocysteine, and nitric oxide (NO), and markers of oxidative status, namely malondialdehyde (MDA), antioxidant potential (AOP), paraoxonase 1 (PON1), and arylesterase, were measured. Before and after atorvastatin treatment, glucose, lipid parameters, and antioxidant/antiinflammatory HDL levels were also measured.

RESULTS

ADMA and homocysteine levels were decreased whereas NO levels were increased with atorvastatin therapy. MDA levels were decreased but AOP, PON1, and arylesterase levels and antinflammatory characteristics of HDLs were increased. Furthermore, lipid profiles of the patients improved with atorvastatin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Hypercholesterolemia is a cause of oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and proinflammatory HDL levels. Atorvastatin is a beneficial pharmacological modulator of impaired antiinflammatory HDL-C levels, endothelial functions, and oxidative status against atherosclerosis indicating pleiotropic effects of statins.

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v PFIZER: EVERGREENING AND MARKET POWER AS A BLOCKBUSTER DRUG GOES OFF PATENT

In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 113, the ACCC alleged that Pfizer's "Project LEAP" involved a scheme to lock pharmacists into substituting its generic version of the high sales volume anti-cholesterol drug, patent-expired atorvastatin (Lipitor), which took advantage of a substantial degree of market power for a purpose proscribed by s 46(1)(c) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). The ACCC also claimed that Pfizer's actions constituted a course of exclusive dealing pursuant to s 47(1)(d) and (e) for the proscribed purpose of lessening competition. Flick J in the Federal Court of Australia, in a judgment heavy with quotations but sparse in reasoning, dismissed the ACCC's Amended Originating Application alleging abuse of market power and ordered the ACCC to pay Pfizer's costs. The ACCC has now appealed the decision. This column explores this case in the context of Pfizer's broader strategies to preserve its income globally from this high sales volume drug in the period following its patent expiration.

Anacetrapib lowers LDL by increasing ApoB clearance in mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects

BACKGROUND

Individuals treated with the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor anacetrapib exhibit a reduction in both LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) in response to monotherapy or combination therapy with a statin. It is not clear how anacetrapib exerts these effects; therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the kinetic mechanism responsible for the reduction in LDL and ApoB in response to anacetrapib.

METHODS

We performed a trial of the effects of anacetrapib on ApoB kinetics. Mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects were randomized to background treatment of either placebo (n = 10) or 20 mg atorvastatin (ATV) (n = 29) for 4 weeks. All subjects then added 100 mg anacetrapib to background treatment for 8 weeks. Following each study period, subjects underwent a metabolic study to determine the LDL-ApoB-100 and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) production rate (PR) and fractional catabolic rate (FCR).

RESULTS

Anacetrapib markedly reduced the LDL-ApoB-100 pool size (PS) in both the placebo and ATV groups. These changes in PS resulted from substantial increases in LDL-ApoB-100 FCRs in both groups. Anacetrapib had no effect on LDL-ApoB-100 PRs in either treatment group. Moreover, there were no changes in the PCSK9 PS, FCR, or PR in either group. Anacetrapib treatment was associated with considerable increases in the LDL triglyceride/cholesterol ratio and LDL size by NMR.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that anacetrapib, given alone or in combination with a statin, reduces LDL-ApoB-100 levels by increasing the rate of ApoB-100 fractional clearance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00990808.

FUNDING

Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA. Additional support for instrumentation was obtained from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000003 and UL1TR000040).

[In what extend we can reach the current LDL-cholesterol treatment goals in secondary prevention]

BACKGROUND

A number of clinical trials have shown that patients with overt atherovascular disease may benefit from more aggressive dosage of statins. We aimed to determined the usual dosage of statin in clinical practice and the adherence to recommended target concentration of LDL-cholesterol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 948 patients with mean age 64.5 years (SD ± 9.0) after acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary revascularization (Czech samples of EUROASPIRE III and IV). In spite that more than 93 % of patients were in 2012/2013 treated with statin, only 2.4 % with the highest dose (atorvastatin 80 mg or equivalent). On the other hand, medium-dosed statin (atorvastatin 40 mg) was more often prescribed, in comparison to 2006/2007. We observed mild improvement in adherence to former LDL-cholesterol target < 2.5 mmol/l (from 54 % to 65 %), but the recent target < 1.8 mmol/l was reached only in less than one quarter of patients in 2012/2013. It can be approximate (using individual LDL-cholesterol values), that after maximal possible up-titration of statin, the adherence to recent LDL-cholesterol target may improve up to 43 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the majority of CHD patients are currently being treated with statin, the usual dosage regimen and adherence to the recommended target values were not consistent with current therapeutic standards for secondary prevention of CHD.

Lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

This represents the first update of this review, which was published in 2012. Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of atorvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides in individuals with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. The primary focus of this review was determination of the mean per cent change from baseline of LDL-cholesterol. Secondary objectives • To quantify the variability of effects of various doses of atorvastatin.• To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to December Week 2 2013), EMBASE (1980 to December Week 2 2013), Web of Science (1899 to December Week 2 2013) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to December Week 2 2013). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. We collected information on withdrawals due to adverse effects from placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found an additional 42 trials and added them to the original 254 studies. The update consists of 296 trials that evaluated dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 38,817 participants. Included are 242 before-and-after trials and 54 placebo-controlled RCTs. Log dose-response data from both trial designs revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. The Summary of findings table 1 documents the effect of atorvastatin on LDL-cholesterol over the dose range of 10 to 80 mg/d, which is the range for which this systematic review acquired the greatest quantity of data. Over this range, blood LDL-cholesterol is decreased by 37.1% to 51.7% (Summary of findings table 1). The slope of dose-related effects on cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was similar for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but rosuvastatin is about three-fold more potent. Subgroup analyses suggested that the atorvastatin effect was greater in females than in males and was greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Risk of bias for the outcome of withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) was high, but the mostly unclear risk of bias was judged unlikely to affect lipid measurements. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were not statistically significantly different between atorvastatin and placebo groups in these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update resulted in no change to the main conclusions of the review but significantly increases the strength of the evidence. Studies show that atorvastatin decreases blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in a linear dose-related manner over the commonly prescribed dose range. New findings include that atorvastatin is more than three-fold less potent than rosuvastatin, and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of atorvastatin are greater in females than in males and greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. This review update does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because included trials were of short duration and adverse effects were not reported in 37% of placebo-controlled trials.

[Effect of atorvastatin on pro-inflammatory status (in vivo and in vitro) in patients with essential hypertension and metabolic syndrome]

AIM

To study effect of atorvastatin on spontaneous production of cytokines and reactive oxygen species by mononuclear leukocytes of blood of hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome in vivo and in vitro.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted an 8-week open prospective study on 36 patients with essential stage II hypertension associated with metabolic syndrome. Along with examination made in specialized cardiological clinic we assessed spontaneous production of cytokines and reactive oxygen species by blood mononuclear leukocytes during therapy with atorvastatin (in vivo). Dynamics of these parameters under the influence of atorvastatin on suspension of mononuclear leukocytes was also assessed in vitro.

RESULTS

Therapy with atorvastatin (20 to 40 mg/day) facilitated reduction of serum concentration of acute phase proteins (C-reactive protein and neopterin) and decrease of spontaneous production by blood mononuclear leukocytes of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) and reactive oxygen species. Dynamics of cytokine concentrations in supernatants of mononuclear leukocytes obtained after incubation of the cells with atorvastatin in vitro confirmed the assumption of direct inhibitory effect of this drug on spontaneous production of some proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1). Absence of significant lowering of concentrations of other proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) and expression of reactive oxygen species in vitro evidenced for complex indirect effect of therapy with atorvastatin on their production.

[Comparative Randomized Study of the Effects of Long-Term Therapy With Rosuvastatin and Combination of Atorvastatin and Ezetimibe on Carbohydrate Metabolism and Adipokines Levels in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Diabetes Mellitus]

OBJECTIVE

This open randomized study compares the effects of 24-week-long treatment with rosuvastatin and with atorvastatin coadministered with ezetimibe on the parameters of carbohydrate metabolism and the plasma levels of adipokynes in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT).

METHOD

A total of 31 patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus or IGT were recruited in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 included patients who received rosuvastatin therapy in an average dose of 12.5 mg/day (n = 16); group 2 included patients who received combination treatment with atorvastatin in an average dose of 13.3 mg/day and ezetimibe (10 mg) (n = 15). Plasma levels of lipids, apoB, apoA1, glucose, insulin, leptin, and adiponectin were evaluated; HOMA-IR index (an empty stomach insulin, mu/l x fasting glucose, mmol/l)/22.5) was calculated.

RESULTS

During the therapy, the LDL-C and apoB levels decreased by 51.7% and 42.3% in group 1 and by 51.8% and 44.9% in group 2, respectively. Reduction in the triglyceride levels was significantly more pronounced in group 2 than in group 1: 43.2% vs 17.4% (p < 0.02), whereas we did not observed significant changes of HDL-C and apoA1 in either group. The increases in basal glycemia, basal insulinemia, HbA1c levels (from 6.47% [6.10-7.02%] to 6.98% 16.23-8.18%]), and HOMA-IR (from 2.14 [1.68-3.51] to 4.30 [2.31-5.77]) were found only in group 2 (p < 0.05 for all). These changes were observed in 75% of patients of group 2 independently of the presence of diabetic state or IGT, but the changes were more pronounced in patients with disturbed carbohydrate metabolism. Changes of leptin levels during the therapy were diverse: 73% patients of group 1 demonstrated decrease in the leptin levels, whereas 67% of patients in group 2 experienced 57%-increase in the leptin concentrations. Degree of increased basal glycemia was associated with increase in the leptin levels (r = 0.37, p = 0.04) in the entire group of patients (n = 31). Furthermore, changes in leptin levels were negatively associated with decreased adiponectin levels (r = -0.57, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

In case of equivalent degree of the decrease in LDL-C levels, 24-week combination therapy with atorvastatin and ezetimibe, unlike rosuvastatin treatment, induced increases in basal glycemia, insulinemia, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR index irrespective of the presence of carbohydrate metabolism disturbances before treatment. Our data suggest that adiponectin and leptin are involved in the mechanisms of adverse metabolic effects of the combination of atorvastatin and ezetimibe.

Effect of concomitant icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester) on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Icosapent ethyl is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester approved as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride levels in adult patients with triglyceride levels ≥500 mg/dL (≥5.65 mmol/L). The objective of this open-label, drug-drug interaction study was to examine the effects of icosapent ethyl on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, a commonly prescribed medication in patients with dyslipidaemia.

METHODS

Thirty healthy subjects received atorvastatin 80 mg/day on days 1-7, icosapent ethyl 4 g/day on days 8-28, and co-administration on days 29-35. Primary end-points were natural log-transformed maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) for atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, and 4-hydroxyatorvastatin with and without icosapent ethyl.

RESULTS

Of the 30 subjects enrolled, 26 completed the study. The 90% confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC(0-24) least-squares geometric mean ratios were within the 0.80-1.25 bounds. Concomitant administration of icosapent ethyl and atorvastatin was safe and well tolerated and icosapent ethyl did not significantly change the steady state C(max) and AUC(0-24) of atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, or 4-hydroxyatorvastatin.

CONCLUSIONS

At steady-state concentrations, icosapent ethyl did not have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin. Co-administration of icosapent ethyl and atorvastatin was safe and well tolerated in healthy adult subjects.

Atorvastatin induces T cell proliferation by a telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mediated mechanism

Statins are one of the most potent drugs in delaying age-related inflammatory changes in the arterial vessel wall, slowing down the progression of atherosclerosis. Statins have also been shown to abrogate telomere-attributed cardiovascular risk. The goal of our study was to explore a potential effect of atorvastatin on telomerase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and T-lymphocytes (T cells).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Treatment with pharmacologically relevant concentrations (0.1-0.3 μM) of atorvastatin resulted in a 6-fold increase of telomerase activity (TA) (p < 0.0001) in human and mouse PBMCs and CD4 T cells, translating into moderate proliferation of T lymphocytes. In contrast, high doses of atorvastatin (2-5 μM) or the addition of LDL cholesterol completely inhibited proliferation, thereby abrogating telomerase activity. The proliferative effect of atorvastatin was ablated by the absense of the catalytic subunit of telomerase, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). Using transgenic GFP-mTert reporter mice, we observed a decrease in telomerase-positive lymphocytes from 30% to 15% during the first 5 months of age (p < 0.01). This suggests that the decrease in immune cell turnover during normal development and maturation is mirrored by a reduction in telomerase activity in lymphocytes in-vivo.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin and cholesterol have opposing effects on telomerase in mononuclear cells and T-lymphocytes. Our study suggests a link between cholesterol metabolism and telomere-related cardiovascular risk.

[Proaterogenic metabolic disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease nondiabetic origin: possibility of statin therapy]

PURPOSE AND MATERIAL: In order to study the state of coronary arteries, and dynamics of parameters of kidney function, lipid metabolism, levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), uricemia during administration of atorvastatin in a complex of standard cardioprotective treatment, we examined 54 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) of nondiabetic origin.

METHODS

All patients were divided in 2 groups: group I - 31 patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min, who were additionally administered atorvastatin 20 mg/day; group II - 23 patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) more or equal 60 ml/min. On day 1 of hospitalization and after 6 months of treatment we determined levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), pulse pressure (PBP), lipid profile, uric acid levels, HbA1c and GFR (Cockcroft - Gault). Angiography of coronary arteries was also performed.

RESULTS

It was found that three of four patients with CKD had coronary stenosis >50% in at least one coronary artery, combined with a substantial elevation of levels of atherogenic lipid fractions, HbA1c and uric acid. Administration of combination atorvastatin with standard treatment of CKD allowed to achieve significant reduction of levels of atherogenic lipid fractions, HbA1c, and uricemia, additional reductions in SBP and PBP by 4-5 mm Hg. Six-months therapy with statin was accompanied by 1.5 fold increase of GFR in patients with initial levels of GFR <60 ml/min.

CONCLUSION

Thus, in patients with nondiabetic CKD statin therapy not only improved lipid metabolism, but also facilitated reduction of HbA1c and uricemia, improved BP control and functional ability of kidneys, especially in individuals with significant coronary artery stenosis.

Combination of Lipitor and Celebrex inhibits prostate cancer VCaP cells in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND/AIM

Lipitor is a cholesterol-lowering drug and Celebrex is a Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. We investigated the effects of Lipitor and Celebrex on human prostate cancer VCaP cells cultured in vitro and grown as orthotopic xenograft tumors in SCID mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Apoptosis was measured by morphological assessment and caspase-3 assay. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation was determined by luciferase reporter assay. B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl2) was measured by western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Orthotopic prostate tumors were monitored by the IVIS imaging system.

RESULTS

the combination of Lipitor and Celebrex had stronger effects on the growth and apoptosis of VCaP cells than did either drug alone. The combination more potently inhibited activation of NFκB and expression of Bcl2 than either drug alone. The growth of orthotopic VCaP prostate tumors was strongly inhibited by treatment with the drug combination.

CONCLUSION

Administration of Lipitor and Celebrex in combination may be an effective strategy for inhibiting the growth of prostate cancer.

Atorvastatin plus omega-3 fatty acid ethyl ester decreases very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride production in insulin resistant obese men

AIM

To test the effect of atorvastatin (ATV) and ATV plus ω-3 FAEEs on VLDL-TG metabolism in obese, insulin resistant men.

METHODS

We carried out a 6-week randomized, placebo-controlled study to examine the effect of ATV (40 mg/day) and ATV plus ω-3 FAEEs (4 g/day) on VLDL-TG metabolism in 36 insulin resistant obese men. VLDL-TG kinetics were determined using d5 -glycerol, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and compartmental modelling.

RESULTS

Compared with the placebo, ATV significantly decreased VLDL-TG concentration (-40%, p < 0.001) by increasing VLDL-TG fractional catabolic rate (FCR) (+47%, p < 0.01). ATV plus ω-3 FAEEs lowered VLDL-TG concentration to a greater degree compared with placebo (-46%, p < 0.001) or ATV monotherapy (-13%, p = 0.04). This was achieved by a reduction in VLDL-TG production rate (PR) compared with placebo (-32%, p = 0.008) or ATV (-20%, p = 0.03) as well as a reciprocal increase in VLDL-TG FCR (+42%, p < 0.05) compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In insulin resistant, dyslipidaemic, obese men, ATV improves VLDL-TG metabolism by increasing VLDL-TG FCR. The addition of 4 g/day ω-3 FAEE to statin therapy provides further TG-lowering by lowering VLDL-TG PR.

Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

In phase 2 studies, evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, reduced LDL-C levels in patients receiving statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of evolocumab when used in combination with a moderate- vs high-intensity statin.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and ezetimibe-controlled study conducted between January and December of 2013 in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia at 198 sites in 17 countries.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients (n = 2067) were randomized to 1 of 24 treatment groups in 2 steps. Patients were initially randomized to a daily, moderate-intensity (atorvastatin [10 mg], simvastatin [40 mg], or rosuvastatin [5 mg]) or high-intensity (atorvastatin [80 mg], rosuvastatin [40 mg]) statin. After a 4-week lipid-stabilization period, patients (n = 1899) were randomized to compare evolocumab (140 mg every 2 weeks or 420 mg monthly) with placebo (every 2 weeks or monthly) or ezetimibe (10 mg or placebo daily; atorvastatin patients only) when added to statin therapies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 and at week 12.

RESULTS

Evolocumab reduced LDL-C levels by 66% (95% CI, 58% to 73%) to 75% (95% CI, 65% to 84%) (every 2 weeks) and by 63% (95% CI, 54% to 71%) to 75% (95% CI, 67% to 83%) (monthly) vs placebo at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 in the moderate- and high-intensity statin-treated groups; the LDL-C reductions at week 12 were comparable. For moderate-intensity statin groups, evolocumab every 2 weeks reduced LDL-C from a baseline mean of 115 to 124 mg/dL to an on-treatment mean of 39 to 49 mg/dL; monthly evolocumab reduced LDL-C from a baseline mean of 123 to 126 mg/dL to an on-treatment mean of 43 to 48 mg/dL. For high-intensity statin groups, evolocumab every 2 weeks reduced LDL-C from a baseline mean of 89 to 94 mg/dL to an on-treatment mean of 35 to 38 mg/dL; monthly evolocumab reduced LDL-C from a baseline mean of 89 to 94 mg/dL to an on-treatment mean of 33 to 35 mg/dL. Adverse events were reported in 36%, 40%, and 39% of evolocumab-, ezetimibe-, and placebo-treated patients, respectively. The most common adverse events in evolocumab-treated patients were back pain, arthralgia, headache, muscle spasms, and pain in extremity (all <2%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this 12-week trial conducted among patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia, evolocumab added to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy resulted in additional LDL-C lowering. Further studies are needed to evaluate the longer-term clinical outcomes and safety of this approach for LDL-C lowering.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01763866.

The incidence of kidney injury for patients treated with a high-potency versus moderate-potency statin regimen after an acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have raised concerns that high-potency statins increase the risk of acute kidney injury. We therefore examined the incidence of kidney injury across 2 randomized trials of statin therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PROVE IT-TIMI 22 enrolled 4162 subjects after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and randomized them to atorvastatin 80 mg/day versus pravastatin 40 mg/day. A-to-Z enrolled 4497 subjects after ACS and randomized them to a high-potency (simvastatin 40 mg/day × 1 months, then simvastatin 80 mg/day) versus a delayed moderate-potency statin strategy (placebo × 4 months, then simvastatin 20 mg/day). Serum creatinine was assessed centrally at serial time points. Adverse events (AEs) relating to kidney injury were identified through database review. Across both trials, mean serum creatinine was similar between treatment arms at baseline and throughout follow-up. In A-to-Z, the incidence of a 1.5-fold or ≥ 0.3 mg/dL rise in serum creatinine was 11.4% for subjects randomized to a high-potency statin regimen versus 12.4% for those on a delayed moderate-potency regimen (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.10; P=0.33). In PROVE IT-TIMI 22, the incidence was 9.4% for subjects randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day and 10.6% for subjects randomized to pravastatin 40 mg/day (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.09; P=0.25). Consistent results were observed for different kidney injury thresholds and in individuals with diabetes mellitus or with moderate renal dysfunction. The incidence of kidney injury-related adverse events (AEs) was not statistically different for patients on a high-potency versus moderate-potency statin regimen (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.67; P=0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients enrolled in 2 large randomized trials of statin therapy after ACS, the use of a high-potency statin regimen did not increase the risk of kidney injury.

Impact of high-dose atorvastatin therapy and clinical risk factors on incident aortic valve stenosis in patients with cardiovascular disease (from TNT, IDEAL, and SPARCL)

Clinical trials have not provided evidence for a role of statin therapy in reducing aortic valve stenosis (AVS) severity in patients with documented AVS. However, whether statin therapy could prevent the onset of AVS is unknown. Our objectives were (1) to compare the incidence rates of AVS among patients treated with high-dose versus usual-dose statin or placebo and (2) to identify clinical risk factors associated with the development of AVS. We conducted post hoc analyses in 23,508 participants from 3 large-scale multicenter atorvastatin randomized blinded clinical trials: Treating to New Targets, the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering, and the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels. The main outcome measure was the incidence of clinical AVS over a median follow-up of 4.9 years (82 cases). Among patients who developed AVS, 39 (47.6%) were treated with atorvastatin 80 mg and 43 (52.4%) were treated with lower dose statin (atorvastatin 10 mg in Treating to New Targets, simvastatin 20 to 40 mg in Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering, or placebo in Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels; hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 1.41, p=0.67). In multivariate analyses forcing treatment, sex, and race into the model, factors that were significantly associated with AVS included age (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.93, p<0.0001 per 1-SD increment), diabetes (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.80, p=0.05), vitamin K antagonist use (HR 3.25, 95% CI 2.06 to 5.16, p<0.0001), and previous statin use (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.54 to 4.60, p=0.0008). In conclusion, random allocation to high-dose versus usual-dose statin therapy or placebo did not impact the incidence of AVS among patients without known AVS. Age, diabetes, vitamin K antagonists, and previous statin use were significant predictors of incident AVS in these high-risk patients.

[Liver damage caused by atorvastatin and cyclosporine in patients with renal transplant]

Kidney transplantation is the preferred method of treatment of end-stage renal disease, which significantly improves the quality of life, but also increases survival when compared to dialysis. Prevention of acute or chronic rejection demands the use of immunosuppression. However, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiovascular disease, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus, chronic graft dysfunction and dyslipidemia may all occur as complications of immunosuppressive therapy. Dyslipidemia is a significant problem in renal transplant recipients due to the fact that it increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients in whom the risk is already higher than in the general population. Very often, there is an interaction between immunosuppressive drugs, especially cyclosporine, and drugs that are used in the treatment of dyslipidemia. We present a case of a patient who developed severe hepatotoxicity after the introduction of atorvastatin in a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen. After discontinuation of atorvastatin and replacement of cyclosporine with everolimus, liver chemistries returned to normal values.

Prevention of arterial stiffening by using low-dose atorvastatin in diabetes is associated with decreased malondialdehyde

Introduction

Without affecting the lipid profile, a low-dose treatment with atorvastatin contributes to the reduction of oxidative stress, inflammation, and adverse cardiovascular events in diabetes. In this study, we investigated whether low-dose atorvastatin exerts any beneficial effect on vascular dynamics in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes in male Wistar rats.

Methods

Diabetes was induced using a single tail-vein injection of STZ at 55 mg kg⁻¹. The diabetic rats were treated daily with atorvastatin (10 mg kg⁻¹ by oral gavage) for 6 weeks. They were also compared with untreated age-matched diabetic controls. Arterial wave reflection was derived using the impulse response function of the filtered aortic input impedance spectra. A thiobarbituric acid reactive substances measurement was used to estimate the malondialdehyde content.

Results

The high plasma level of total cholesterol in the diabetic rats did not change in response to this low-dose treatment with atorvastatin. Atorvastatin resulted in a significant increase of 15.4% in wave transit time and a decrease of 33.5% in wave reflection factor, suggesting that atorvastatin may attenuate the diabetes-induced deterioration in systolic loads imposed on the heart. This was in parallel with its lowering of malondialdehyde content in plasma and aortic walls in diabetes. Atorvastatin therapy also prevented the diabetes-related cardiac hypertrophy, as evidenced by the diminished ratio of left ventricular weight to body weight.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that low-dose atorvastatin might protect diabetic vasculature against diabetes-associated deterioration in aorta stiffness and cardiac hypertrophy, possibly through its decrease of lipid oxidation-derived malondialdehyde.

Can a high reloading dose of atorvastatin prior to percutaneous coronary intervention reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction?

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) is a common complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and statins have been shown to reduce MI in statin-naïve patients. We aimed to identify whether a high reloading dose of atorvastatin can prevent MI following PCI in patients who were already being treated with statins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this triple-blind controlled randomized clinical trial, 190 candidates for elective PCI, who were already using statins and/or other lipid lowering agents such as fibrates, were randomly assigned to two equal groups to receive either atorvastatin (80 mg) or placebo within 24 hours before the procedure. Serum levels of creatinine kinase myocardial isoenzyme (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I (cTNI) and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured at baseline and then 6 and 12 hours following PCI. Post-procedural MI was defined as troponin elevation>5-fold in patients with normal baseline or >20% in those with elevated baseline measurements with or without chest pain or ST segment or T wave abnormalities.

RESULTS

Frequency of MI in the atorvastatin group was 3 (3.1%) vs. 10 (10.5%) in the placebo group (p=0.04). The CK-MB rise within 6 hours following PCI was 0.6±0.3 mg/dl in the intervention group versus 3.0±1.6 mg/dl in the placebo group. Also, the levels of cTNI within 6 and 12 hours in the intervention group was significantly lower than the placebo group (p=0.01 and 0.008, respectively). hs-CRP was significantly lower in the intervention group after 12 hours (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Administration of a high reloading dose of atorvastatin within 24 hours before PCI could significantly reduce the frequency of periprocedural MI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION CODE: IRCT201205209768N1.