Immunogenicity of a highly attenuated MVA smallpox vaccine and protection against monkeypox

The potential use of smallpox as a biological weapon has led to the production and stockpiling of smallpox vaccine and the immunization of some healthcare workers. Another public health goal is the licensing of a safer vaccine that could benefit the millions of people advised not to take the current one because they or their contacts have increased susceptibility to severe vaccine side effects. As vaccines can no longer be tested for their ability to prevent smallpox, licensing will necessarily include comparative immunogenicity and protection studies in non-human primates. Here we compare the highly attenuated modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) with the licensed Dryvax vaccine in a monkey model. After two doses of MVA or one dose of MVA followed by Dryvax, antibody binding and neutralizing titres and T-cell responses were equivalent or higher than those induced by Dryvax alone. After challenge with monkeypox virus, unimmunized animals developed more than 500 pustular skin lesions and became gravely ill or died, whereas vaccinated animals were healthy and asymptomatic, except for a small number of transient skin lesions in animals immunized only with MVA.

Mouse neurotoxicity test for vaccinia-based smallpox vaccines

The only US FDA licensed smallpox vaccine, Dryvax, was associated with rare but serious neurological adverse events. After smallpox was eradicated in the United States, mass vaccination ceased in 1971. As counter-bioterrorism/biowarfare measures, new smallpox vaccines are now being investigated. However, there are no established pre-clinical neurotoxicity assays with which to evaluate these new vaccines prior to licensure. Here we report the development and initial characterization of a small animal neurotoxicity assay for vaccinia-based smallpox vaccines using Dryvax virus as a reference vaccine strain and the neuroadapted Western Reserve (WR) strain as a neurotoxic positive control. In neonatally inoculated mice, the WR strain produced significantly greater and more rapid onset of mortality than the Dryvax vaccine reference. Expression of virus antigen in neural cells and infectious virus replication in the brain was also significantly different between the two strains. In addition, the appearance of high titer virus antibody correlated with the clearance of virus from brain. With further validation, this assay incorporating a licensed vaccine reference standard and positive control strain may provide important pre-clinical neurotoxicity data on new vaccinia-based smallpox vaccine strains.

Looking back at smallpox

Smallpox apparently arose through transfer of variola virus to humans from another animal species. By causing a brief infection that required close contact for transmission and engendered solid immunity, the agent was always vulnerable to simple isolation measures. The high replicative fidelity of the viral DNA polymerase limited variola's ability to adapt to humans and preserved orthopoxviral antigenic cross-reactivity, so that vaccinia vaccination protected against smallpox. Host-derived genes encoding immunomodulatory proteins helped shelter viral replication from innate immune responses. Examination of clinical variants suggests that severity of illness was usually determined by host responses during the incubation period. Control of viral replication was aided by early postexposure vaccination and might be strengthened by additional immunological interventions. Massive inflammatory responses were responsible for major features of illness. Some patients with high levels of circulating virus developed hemorrhagic disease resembling septic shock. Continued study of virus-host interactions is needed to defend against genetically modified agents.

Smallpox vaccine: problems and prospects

Smallpox justifiably is feared because of its morbidity and mortality. Wide-spread population-level susceptibility to smallpox exists, and the only effective tool against the virus is a live, attenuated vaccine that is highly reactogenic and controversial. A significant minority of the population has contraindications that prevent preexposure use of this vaccine. Newer, safer, and equally immunogenic vaccines must be developed and licensed. Several live, attenuated vaccines are in clinical trials. Although these vaccines may prove to be less reactogenic, they still may not be administered safely to a significant portion of the population because they contain live, attenuated viruses. Newer vaccines will be needed if routine preexposure vaccination is to be instituted universally. The idea of a subunit or peptide-based vaccine is appealing, because it obviates potential safety concerns. It may be possible to use a more-attenuated, live vaccine strain for a large segment of the population on a preexposure basis and accept the morbidity and mortality that would result from its use on a postexposure basis, if necessary. The need for widespread population-level protection against variola infection is apparent. The use of the new biology tools to predict or define who might experience serious reactions to the smallpox vaccine and why these reactions occur is an area ripe for additional research. The reason why an individual develops postvaccinal encephalitis remains unknown, and the development is unpredictable and untreatable. In the future, if the mechanism behind such adverse events is defined, it may be possible to screen persons who are likely to experience such events. Although the authors remain proponents for use of the vaccine in alignment with the CDC vaccination program and recommendations, the previous concerns indicate that new knowledge must be gained and shared. Further research on attenuated vaccines and nonliving or peptide vaccines with equal efficacy should remain the goal, as it is apparent that smallpox vaccine once again will become part of the vaccinologist's and public health official's armamentarium in the decades to come.

Cutting edge: long-term B cell memory in humans after smallpox vaccination

Memory B cells are a central component of humoral immunity, and yet little is known about their longevity in humans. Immune memory after smallpox vaccination (DryVax) is a valuable benchmark for understanding the longevity of B cell memory in the absence of re-exposure to Ag. In this study, we demonstrate that smallpox vaccine-specific memory B cells last for >50 years in immunized individuals. Virus-specific memory B cells initially declined postimmunization, but then reached a plateau approximately 10-fold lower than peak and were stably maintained for >50 years after vaccination at a frequency of approximately 0.1% of total circulating IgG(+) B cells. These persisting memory B cells were functional and able to mount a robust anamnestic Ab response upon revaccination. Additionally, virus-specific CD4(+) T cells were detected decades after vaccination. These data show that immunological memory to DryVax vaccine is long-lived and may contribute to protection against smallpox.

Flow cytometry and T-cell response monitoring after smallpox vaccination

Orthopoxvirus zoonosis or smallpox as result of bioterrorism or biological warfare represents a risk for epidemic spread. By monitoring T-cell responses by flow cytometry, we observed a recall response after recent vaccination against smallpox. When the high similarity between the orthopoxviruses is considered, this rapid assay that uses vaccinia antigens could identify recently exposures.

Dose-dependent neutralizing-antibody responses to vaccinia

To evaluate the humoral immune responses to smallpox-vaccine stocks currently available in the United States (Dryvax; Wyeth) and to generate data for comparison of responses to newly produced lots of smallpox vaccine, we evaluated dose-response effects, using undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine. At 28 and 56 days after vaccination, serum samples were obtained from vaccinated subjects (N=674) who had participated in a randomized, single-blinded trial of an undiluted or a 1 : 5 or 1 : 10 dilution of smallpox vaccine and who subsequently were tested for plaque-reduction neutralizing-antibody titer. All subjects who developed a vesicle after vaccination also developed neutralizing antibodies by day 28. Subjects given either a 1 : 5 or 1 : 10 dilution of vaccinia had significantly higher neutralizing-antibody titers than did subjects given undiluted vaccine. Larger lesion size and fever after vaccination were associated with significantly higher neutralizing-antibody titers after vaccination.

Monitoring of human immunological responses to vaccinia virus

For the last 30 yr, interest in vaccinia virus immune monitoring has focused on the use of the vaccinia virus as a recombinant vaccine vector and the potential detrimental effect of antivector immunity on subsequent vaccination with a recombinant vaccinia virus. However, interest in this area has intensified after the publication of reports suggesting that smallpox may be a major pathogen selected for bioterrorist activities. Owing to the unacceptably high incidence of complications induced by previous effective smallpox vaccine strains, alternative safer strains (e.g., modified vaccinia Ankara [MVA]) are being assessed for their antigenicity in clinical trials. The exact immune effector mechanism responsible for vaccine-induced protection to smallpox infection has not been fully elucidated, although it is believed that neutralizing antibody plays a major role. This chapter describes a simple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to quantify vaccinia virus antibody titer. Additionally, to define serum-neutralizing activity, both a classical plaque reduction assay and a high-throughput 96-well plate method based on reduction of recombinant vaccinia virus expressed beta-galactosidase is described. Furthermore, details are given for a T-cell proliferation assay, primarily for monitoring T-helper CD4 activity and an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay for CD8 analysis. The use of reliable immunological assays is vital in assessing the potential efficacy of new vaccines to protect against smallpox infection.

Age Distribution for T Cell Reactivity to Vaccinia Virus in a Healthy Population

The potential for bioterrorism involving smallpox has led to a debate about the durability of protective immunity against smallpox from vaccination. By assessing the T cell reactivity to vaccinia virus in a healthy population, we show that subjects who were vaccinated within the past 3 decades and who have a visible vaccination scar had remarkable T cell reactivity. However, person who were vaccinated within the past 3 decades but who do not have a scar and those who were vaccinated >4 decades ago had responses as low as those in unvaccinated subjects. Thus, we estimate that the significant T cell memory response to vaccinia virus from successful vaccination may persist for only 20-30 years. Furthermore, we found the vaccinia-specific cellular immunity could be easily assessed by determination of the frequencies of vaccinia-specific CD69 expression on T cell subsets. These data may help in the development of public health strategies to counter bioterrorism threats associated with smallpox.

Human monkeypox: an emerging zoonosis

Human monkeypox is a rare viral zoonosis endemic to central and western Africa that has recently emerged in the USA. Laboratory diagnosis is important because the virus can cause disease that is clinically indistinguishable from other pox-like illnesses, particularly smallpox and chickenpox. Although the natural animal reservoir of the monkeypox virus is unknown, rodents are the probable source of its introduction into the USA. A clear understanding of the virulence and transmissibility of human monkeypox has been limited by inconsistencies in epidemiological investigations. Monkeypox is the most important orthopoxvirus infection in human beings since the eradication of smallpox in the 1970s. There is currently no proven treatment for human monkeypox, and questions about its potential as an agent of bioterrorism persist.

Analysis of historical data suggests long-lasting protective effects of smallpox vaccination

More than half of the US population has received the smallpox vaccine, but it is unknown what fraction is still protected against infection and disease. Residual protection and age-dependent case-fatality ratios have therefore been widely neglected in the current bioterrorism debate. The author analyzed 1902-1903 data from Liverpool, United Kingdom, and from reintroductions of the disease to Europe in 1950-1971 to estimate to what degree vaccinated cases were protected against developing severe or fatal disease and how quickly this protection waned over time. Protection against severe and fatal disease was lost at the rate of 1.41% per year, corresponding to a half-life of 49.2 years (95% confidence interval: 42.0, 57.3), and protection against fatal disease alone declined 0.363% per year. Thus, even 70 years after primary vaccination, 77.6% of cases were still protected (95% confidence interval: 66.6, 85.4). Protection against severe disease should therefore extend for many decades after a single vaccination, and protection against death from smallpox may even be lifelong for the majority of vaccinees. This protection should greatly reduce the number of severe and fatal cases of disease expected in a bioterrorist attack, but residual protection may also increase the risk that some previously vaccinated cases who develop mild disease may remain unrecognized longer, while moving around freely and disseminating the infection.

Modeling a Safer Smallpox Vaccination Regimen, for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Patients, in Immunocompromised Macaques

We have modeled smallpox vaccination with Dryvax (Wyeth) in rhesus macaques that had depletion of CD4(+) T cells induced by infection with simian immunodeficiency virus or simian/human immunodeficiency virus. Smallpox vaccination induced significantly larger skin lesions in immunocompromised macaques than in healthy macaques. Unexpectedly, "progressive vaccinia" was infrequent. Vaccination of immunocompromised macaques with the genetically-engineered, replication-deficient poxvirus NYVAC, before or after retrovirus infection, was safe and lessened the severity of Dryvax-induced skin lesions. Neutralizing antibodies to vaccinia were induced by NYVAC, even in macaques with severe CD4(+) T cell depletion, and their titers inversely correlated with the time to complete resolution of the skin lesions. Together, these results provide the proof of concept, in macaque models that mirror human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, that a prime-boost approach with a highly attenuated poxvirus followed by Dryvax increases the safety of smallpox vaccination, and they highlight the importance of neutralizing antibodies in protection against virulent poxvirus.

Rates and risks of transmission of smallpox and mechanisms of prevention

In 1980, the World Health Organization declared smallpox eradicated from the world; the last known natural case had occurred in Somalia in 1977, and the United States had stopped routinely vaccinating its citizens in 1972. However, with increasing concerns regarding domestic and international terrorism, smallpox has resurfaced as a potential threat to global health. We review the direct and indirect modes of smallpox transmission and how patterns of transmission vary substantially, depending on the severity of circulating disease, vaccination status, environmental and socioeconomic factors, and the setting of an outbreak. We examine mechanisms for controlling outbreaks of disease and preventing further transmission in the event of an outbreak, with an emphasis on smallpox vaccination.

Development and use of a vaccinia virus neutralization assay based on flow cytometric detection of green fluorescent protein

A rapid and sensitive neutralization assay is required to evaluate alternative smallpox vaccines. Here we describe the development and use of a 96-well plate, semi-automated, flow cytometric assay that uses a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein and which would be applicable to other viruses.

Duration of antiviral immunity after smallpox vaccination

Although naturally occurring smallpox was eliminated through the efforts of the World Health Organization Global Eradication Program, it remains possible that smallpox could be intentionally released. Here we examine the magnitude and duration of antiviral immunity induced by one or more smallpox vaccinations. We found that more than 90% of volunteers vaccinated 25-75 years ago still maintain substantial humoral or cellular immunity (or both) against vaccinia, the virus used to vaccinate against smallpox. Antiviral antibody responses remained stable between 1-75 years after vaccination, whereas antiviral T-cell responses declined slowly, with a half-life of 8-15 years. If these levels of immunity are considered to be at least partially protective, then the morbidity and mortality associated with an intentional smallpox outbreak would be substantially reduced because of pre-existing immunity in a large number of previously vaccinated individuals.

Clonal vaccinia virus grown in cell culture as a new smallpox vaccine

Although the smallpox virus was eradicated over 20 years ago, its potential release through bioterrorism has generated renewed interest in vaccination. To develop a modern smallpox vaccine, we have adapted vaccinia virus that was derived from the existing Dryvax vaccine for growth in a human diploid cell line. We characterized six cloned and one uncloned vaccine candidates. One clone, designated ACAM1000, was chosen for development based on its comparability to Dryvax when tested in mice, rabbits and monkeys for virulence and immunogenicity. By most measures, ACAM1000 was less virulent than Dryvax. We compared ACAM1000 and Dryvax in a randomized, double-blind human clinical study. The vaccines were equivalent in their ability to produce major cutaneous reactions ('takes') and to induce neutralizing antibody and cell-mediated immunity against vaccinia virus.

Smallpox: residual antibody after vaccination

Of all the microorganisms and toxins, poxviruses (Orthopoxvirus) have the greatest potential for use by terrorists. These viruses can spread rapidly through the environment following initial infection. In 1980, the World Health Organization Eradication Program discontinued vaccination for smallpox and declared that the disease had been eliminated. With the threat of smallpox virus as a bioterrorism weapon, questions have been asked about the persistence of protection (as offered by antibodies) following vaccination with vaccinia virus vaccine. To address this, sera from 204 adults vaccinated as children were tested by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the presence of vaccinia virus antibody. Of the 204 individuals whose sera were examined for the presence of vaccinia antibody, 165 (80.9%) had been vaccinated once and 39 (19.1%) had been vaccinated at least twice. Of the 165 sera from individuals vaccinated once, 112 (67.9%) were positive. Of the 39 sera from individuals vaccinated more than once, 31 (79.5%) were positive. The presence of a vaccination scar at the time of blood collection was not determined. Fifty-six nonvaccinated individuals, under 30 years of age, were tested by EIA; four of these (7.1%) were positive for vaccinia virus antibody by EIA. Forty-four EIA-positive and 16 EIA-negative sera were also tested by serum neutralization (SN) as a comparison with the EIA test results; one serum (negative by EIA) was SN positive. No attempt was made to ascertain any demographics other than age (date of birth) and "remembered" times of vaccination.