The impact of novel immunosuppressive agents on infections in organ transplant recipients and the interactions of these agents with antimicrobials

Several of the new immunosuppressive agents that are used to treat transplant recipients possess in vitro activity against specific pathogens, enhance the activity of antimicrobial agents, or have unique drug interactions with antimicrobial agents. Mycophenolate mofetil may have a protective effect against Pneumocystis carinii; it also enhances the activity of ganciclovir and has strong antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1. High doses of mycophenolate mofetil have been associated with a higher frequency of tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease but not with asymptomatic cytomegalovirus infection. Rapamycin exhibits potent in vitro fungicidal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and several pathogenic fungi in transplant recipients; however, it is not known whether its immunosuppressive effect in organ transplant recipients outweighs its antifungal activity. Recognition of the unique characteristics of these agents and the evolving spectrum of opportunistic infections has implications for the differential diagnosis, management, and prophylaxis of infections in organ transplant recipients in the modern immunosuppressive era.

[Metabolic modifications related to immunosuppressive drugs]

After transplantation, immunosuppressive drugs induce frequently lipid changes and glucose intolerance which result in worsening of the patient's prognosis. The mechanisms of the metabolic changes of corticosteroid hormones, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus and mycophelonate are shortly reviewed but are not fully understood. Controlling serum lipids is critical in the management of the patients after transplantation. Statins seem to be the best choice but it remains some concerns about drug interactions and risk of rhabdomyolysis. Fibrates except gemfibrozil are not recommended because potential renal side effects.

Exposure-response relationships for everolimus in de novo kidney transplantation: defining a therapeutic range

BACKGROUND

Exposure, safety, and efficacy data from the two everolimus randomized, double-blind phase 3 trials were evaluated to identify a therapeutic concentration range applicable in de novo kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 695 evaluable everolimus-treated patients received either 0.75 or 1.5 mg bid in addition to corticosteroids and cyclosporine (troughs 150-400 ng/ml in month 1 and 100-300 ng/ml thereafter). A total of 3355 everolimus trough levels (Cmin) were obtained in weeks 1 and 2 and months 1, 2, 3, and 6 after transplantation. Each patient's average Cmin was calculated and the values were divided into quintiles: 1.0-3.4, 3.5-4.5, 4.6-5.7, 5.8-7.7, 7.8-15.0 ng/ml (139 patients per quintile). Efficacy was freedom from biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Safety measures were maximum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and minimum leukocyte and platelet counts. A sigmoid exposure-response model was used to test the significance of these Cmin-efficacy and Cmin-safety relationships.

RESULTS

Freedom from acute rejection was significantly related to Cmin with an incidence of 68% at 1.0-3.4 ng/ml, 81-86% at 3.5-7.7 ng/ml, and 91% at 7.8-15.0 ng/ml (P=0.03). The incidence of hypercholesterolemia, defined as >6.5 mmol/liter, ranged from 76 to 87% over the exposure range without a significant relation to Cmin (P=0.37). The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, defined as >2.9 mmol/liter, rose from 59 to 77% across the exposure groups (P=0.02). Leukocytopenia, defined as <4x10(9)/liter, occurred in 11-19% of patients across the exposure quintiles showing no relationship to Cmin (P=0.76). The incidence of thrombocytopenia, defined as <100x10(9)/liter, occurred in </=10% of patients in the first 3 Cmin quintiles and was 14 and 17% in Cmin quintiles 4 and 5 (P=0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly increased risk of acute rejection was observed at everolimus trough levels <3 ng/ml. This is a lower therapeutic concentration limit when everolimus is used with conventionally dosed cyclosporine. Because hyperlipidemias responded to counter-measure therapies and thrombocytopenia had an overall low incidence of 12%, everolimus-related adverse events were manageable up to the highest troughs observed in this population of 15 ng/ml. An upper therapeutic concentration limit is likely more than 15 ng/ml but a precise value could not be derived from these data.

[New developments in immunosuppressive therapy]

A highly effective immunosuppressive therapy with as few side effects as possible can only be achieved by a reliable drug monitoring. For neoral monitoring of the C2 level is essential while for tacrolimus measuring of the trough level is sufficient. Due to the different immunogenicity of the organ transplants the type and intensity of the immunosuppressive therapy should be organ-specific. Sirolimus is highly effective in combination with calcineurin antagonists in immunologically high-risk patients. In addition in case of severe side effects sirolimus can substitute for the calcineurin antagonists. Il-2 receptor antibodies are characterized by minimal side effects and have been shown to be a highly effective new therapeutic principle for immunosuppressive induction therapy.

De novo hemolytic uremic syndrome after kidney transplantation in patients treated with cyclosporine-sirolimus combination

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine factors that predisposed 1.5% (10/672) of renal transplant recipients treated with a cyclosporine (CsA)/sirolimus (SRL)/steroid immunosuppressive regimen to develop hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS).

METHODS

Two cohorts of recipients were treated for 1-212 months (mean: 25.0+/-26.4, median: 18.1) with concentration-control CsA regimens based upon either area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; n=412 patients) or trough measurements (C0; n=260 patients).

RESULTS

The only demographic feature more common to affected patients was an original glomerulopathic disease in 7 patients, 4 of whom had displayed IgA glomerulonephritis. All 10 affected patients showed a clinical picture of hemolysis with schistocytes, thrombocytopenia (nadir: 35,000+/-19,600 platelets/mm3), as well as elevated serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (1697+/-1427 IU) and creatinine (Scr; 2.05+/-1.52 mg/dL prediagnosis to 5.13+/-2.43 mg/dL at diagnosis). Seven patients experienced adverse events concomitant with the bout of HUS, namely, acute rejection episodes prior to (n=2) or during (n=3), and 2 patients, infections (Herpes simplex and pancolitis). The mean values of daily steroid dose and the immunosuppressive drug C0 values were above the putative therapeutic targets: namely, CsA C0=294.9+/-153.2 ng/ml versus 150+/-50 ng/ml and SRL C0=20.1+/-14.0 ng/ml versus 10+/-5 ng/ml, respectively. The therapeutic approach included discontinuation of CsA in 9/10, which was transient in 6/9; discontinuation of SRL in all 10, which was transient in 3, OKT3 for concurrent rejection in 3, and plasmapheresis in 5 patients. At 24 weeks postdiagnosis 9/10 patients have well-functioning kidneys with a mean Scr value of 1.6+/-0.59 mg/dL. One patient who underwent transplant nephrectomy subsequently succumbed due to a cluster of refractory thrombocytopenia, Aspergillus infection, and multiorgan failure.

CONCLUSION

This initial experience suggests that a time-limited and reversible de novo HUS syndrome may be less frequent and milder among renal transplant recipients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression.

Early clinical experience with a novel rapamycin derivative

SDZ RAD (everolimus, Certican is a novel macrolide immunosuppressant that blocks growth factor-driven transduction signals in the T-cell response to alloantigen. After stimulation of the IL-2 receptor on the activated T-cell, SDZ RAD inhibits p70S6 kinase, acting at a later stage in the T-cell mediated response than do cyclosporine and other calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Unlike the CNIs, SDZ RAD is a proliferation signal inhibitor, blocking growth factor-driven proliferation of both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells. These activities are complementary to those of cyclosporine and provide a rationale for the addition of SDZ RAD to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, with the potential for minimizing CNI nephrotoxicity, reducing the incidence of acute rejection, and favoring long-term graft survival. Potential also exists for beneficial effects on other factors that may influence the development of chronic rejection. These factors include comorbid diseases such as hypertension, which may affect transplant vasculopathy, and opportunistic infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other viruses, which may increase the risk of chronic rejection. The synergistic effect of SDZ RAD and cyclosporine has been confirmed in preclinical models, with graft survival being significantly prolonged in rat models of kidney and heart allotransplantation. Clinical experience with SDZ RAD in cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, including low-dose cyclosporine regimens, has also resulted in predictable and favorable clinical outcomes. Low rates of acute rejection, excellent rates of patient and graft survival, lower incidence of CMV infections, better cholesterol, triglyceride and creatinine profiles, and better renal function have been demonstrated with SDZ RAD and lower doses of cyclosporine (Neoral; Novartis) in recipients of renal transplants. These findings, combined with good tolerability rates and an acceptable side-effect profile, indicate that the synergistic profile of SDZ RAD in combination with nontoxic dosages of CNI's and IL2 inhibitors will further improve longterm results in renal transplantation.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors when coadministered with everolimus

The authors assessed the mutual influence of the immunosuppressant everolimus (Certican) and the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and pravastatin when coadministered based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures. In this randomized, open-label, three-way crossover study, 24 healthy men received three single-dose oral treatments: 2 mg everolimus, 20 mg atorvastatin (n = 12) or 20 mg pravastatin (n = 12), and the respective statin coadministered with everolimus. Consecutive treatments were separated by a 14-day washout. The pharmacokinetics of all three drugs and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were measured. Everolimus Cmax was reduced by 9% and 10% with atorvastatin and pravastatin coadministration; the corresponding decreases in everolimus AUC were 5% and 6%, respectively. Everolimus coadministration increased the Cmax of atorvastatin by 11% but had no influence on atorvastatin AUC. Coadministration of everolimus with pravastatin was associated with a 10% decrease in pravastatin Cmax and a 5% decrease in the AUC. The elimination half-lives of the two statins were unaffected by everolimus. Changes in total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in plasma exhibited generally similar patterns as for the parent statin exposures. Single-dose administrations of everolimus with either atorvastatin or pravastatin did not influence the pharmacokinetics of everolimus, atorvastatin, pravastatin, or total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in plasma to a clinically relevant extent.

Effect of food on everolimus absorption: quantification in healthy subjects and a confirmatory screening in patients with renal transplants

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To quantify the influence of a high-fat meal on the oral bioavailability of the immunosuppressant everolimus in a single-dose study in healthy subjects and to confirm the results in a small food-effect screening assessment in patients with renal transplants who were receiving multiple-dose everolimus.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, crossover, single-dose study and confirmatory screening.

SETTING

Phase 1 unit for the single-dose study and two German hospitals for the patient screening.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-four healthy male volunteers; six clinically stable patients with renal transplants who were originally part of a phase I dose-escalation study.

INTERVENTION

The 24 healthy men received everolimus 2 mg orally under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal. The six patients received everolimus 2.5 mg/day orally, in addition to cyclosporine and prednisone. On two occasions, a pharmacokinetic profile was obtained over the dosing interval after drug administration under fasting conditions and after a high-fat meal in a randomized sequence.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the single-dose study in healthy subjects, a high-fat meal delayed everolimus time to maximum concentration (Tmax) by a median 1.25 hours, reduced peak blood concentration (Cmax) by 60%, and reduced area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 16%. In the multiple-dose screening in patients with renal transplants, a high-fat meal delayed Tmax by a median 1.75 hours and reduced Cmax by 53% and AUC by 21%. Everolimus trough levels showed no food effect, whereas the peak-trough fluctuation was dampened by 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-fat meal modestly reduced everolimus AUC. To minimize longitudinal variability in exposure, everolimus should be administered consistently either with food or without food.

Improving tolerability of immunosuppressive regimens

CNIs and corticosteroids are associated with adverse effects that can diminish quality of life and detrimentally affect long-term allograft and patient survival. Nephrotoxicity is the major side effect of CNI therapy. A search has been ongoing for improved immunosuppressive regimens that will provide adequate protection against acute allograft rejection, while decreasing the nephrotoxic and other effects associated with CNIs. This paper reviewed the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus as a potential new option in transplantation, focusing on its mechanism of action and clinical efficacy as well as potential antiproliferative and antineoplastic properties. The findings and lessons learned from key clinical studies in which sirolimus was used to augment or replace CNIs and/or corticosteroids were highlighted, and the importance of clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring in these regimens were discussed. Preliminary studies of combination therapy with sirolimus and tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation indicate that sirolimus/tacrolimus combination therapy may provide strong protection against acute rejection and diminish the nephrotoxicity associated with CNI-based therapy. Other studies suggest that sirolimus can be used as base immunosuppressive therapy, thereby completely avoiding the nephrotoxicity associated with CNI-based therapies, while continuing to provide powerful protection against rejection. With patients surviving longer with functional allografts, quality of life is becoming an increasing important clinical endpoint in transplantation. The studies reviewed here suggest that sirolimus might be used to improve quality of life significantly without increasing the risk of allograft rejection or shortening patient survival.

Sirolimus (rapamycin) for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

In a pilot trial we evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of sirolimus (rapamycin) as second-line therapy for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in 21 patients (1-46 years of age) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

All patients were treated with methylprednisolone at 2 mg/kg/day, but failed to respond satisfactorily. Sirolimus was started 19-78 (median 37) days after HSCT when 10 patients had grade III and 11 had grade IV GVHD. The first four patients received a loading dose (15 mg/m2) of oral sirolimus on day 1 followed by 5 mg/m2/day for 13 days. The next 17 patients received either 5 (n=7) or 4 (n=10) mg/m2/day for 14 days without a loading dose. Eleven patients completed the 14-day sirolimus course. Five patients were treated for 9-13 days, two for 6 days, and three for 1-3 days.

RESULTS

Sirolimus was discontinued early in 10 patients because of lack of improvement in GVHD (n=5), myelosuppression (n=2), seizure (n=2), and attending physician preference (n=1). The most common and significant adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=7) and neutropenia (n=4). Other side effects included increased blood triglycerides (n=8) and cholesterol (n=3). Five patients had evidence of a hemolytic uremic syndrome concurrently with or after sirolimus treatment. Eighteen of the 21 patients received 6 or more doses of sirolimus and 12 responded, 5 with complete and 7 with partial responses. Six of the 12 responders (28% of all patients enrolled) and 1 nonresponder are currently alive at 400-907 days after HSCT, 3 with chronic GVHD. Fourteen of the 21 patients (66%) died 40-263 days after transplant.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that sirolimus has activity in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GVHD. However, there was considerable toxicity and further dose optimization studies seem warranted.

Nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs: new insight and preventive strategies

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus reduce allograft rejection, improve allograft half-life and patient survival. Ironically, the nephrotoxicity of these agents may adversely affect allograft survival in renal transplant recipients or cause end-stage renal diseases in other solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients. Acute dose-dependent and chronic non-dose-dependent nephrotoxicity has been reported in both transplant recipients and patients with autoimmune disorders. Preliminary evidence suggests that drug therapeutic monitoring has little value in the diagnosis or management of nephrotoxicity associated with calcineurin inhibitors. Although the exact mechanism of nephrotoxicity is not fully understood, several factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of immunosuppressive-induced nephrotoxicity. Renal and systemic vasoconstriction, increased release of endothelin-1, decreased production of nitric acid and increased expression of TGF-beta are the major adverse pathophysiologic abnormalities of these agents. Reducing the dose of a calcineurin inhibitor, or using protocols without calcineurin inhibition may ultimately minimize the risk of drug toxicity and improve allograft and patient survival. New experiences with non-nephrotoxic agents and protocols including mycophenolate and sirolimus allow for early calcineurin inhibitor reduction or elimination without increasing the risk of allograft rejection.

Macrolactam immunomodulators for topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases

The immunomodulatory macrolactams provide an alternative to glucocorticosteroids for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis and other inflammatory dermatoses. Tacrolimus (FK506), as well as the newer ascomycin derivative ASM 981 (pimecrolimus), penetrate the inflamed epidermis and are suitable for topical therapy. Both substances inhibit the transcription of proinflammatory cytokine genes such as interleukin 2, which are dependent on the nuclear factor NF-AT. They block the catalytic function of calcineurin, which leads to the inhibition of the transport of the cytoplasmic component of NF-AT to the cell nucleus. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trials with topical formulations have shown the efficacy of both substances in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. A review is presented of the biochemical and cell biologic properties, mode of action, pharmacokinetic data, side effects, results of the clinical trials, and further indications for tacrolimus and ASM 981, along with an overview of the related substances cyclosporine and sirolimus (rapamycin).

Sirolimus: a comprehensive review

Sirolimus (Rapamune), Wyeth-Ayerst, Madison, NJ) is a new, potent, immunosuppressant that is emerging as a foundation for long-term immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. The drug acts during both co-stimulatory activation and cytokine-driven pathways via a unique mechanism: inhibition of a multifunctional serine-threonine kinase, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Although there is no a priori reason to assume it, sirolimus displays a synergistic interaction to enhance the efficacy of cyclosporin A (CsA). In trials wherein the concentrations of CsA and sirolimus were tightly controlled, rates of acute rejection episodes were < 10%, despite markedly reduced exposures to each agent. In pivotal multi-centre blinded dose-controlled trials, the rates of acute rejection episodes within 12 months following administration of 2 or 5 mg/day sirolimus in combination with CsA and steroids were reduced to 19 and 14%, respectively. Since the inhibitory effect of sirolimus disables virtually all responses to cytokine mediators due to the widespread involvement of mTOR in multiple signalling pathways, the agent is likely also to retard proliferation of endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, an important component of the immuno-obliterative processes associated with chronic rejection. The advantages of this unique therapeutic action combined with an intrinsic lack of nephrotoxicity are counterbalanced by myelosuppressive and hyperlipidaemic side effects. Ongoing studies are assessing whether the long-term benefits of sirolimus to permit reduction in exposure to or elimination of calcineurin inhibitors ameliorate the progression of chronic nephropathy, the condition that erodes long-term renal transplant survival.

Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported a virtual absence of neointimal hyperplasia 4 months after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether these results are sustained over a period of 1 year.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-five patients with de novo coronary disease were successfully treated with the implantation of a single sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent in São Paulo, Brazil (n=30, 15 fast release [group I, GI] and 15 slow release [GII]) and Rotterdam, The Netherlands (15 slow release, GIII). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was obtained at 4 and 12 months (GI and GII) and 6 months (GIII). In-stent minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis remained essentially unchanged in all groups (at 12 months, GI and GII; at 6 months, GIII). Follow-up in-lesion minimal lumen diameter was 2.28 mm (GIII), 2.32 mm (GI), and 2.48 mm (GII). No patient approached the >/=50% diameter stenosis at 1 year by angiography or IVUS assessment, and no edge restenosis was observed. Neointimal hyperplasia, as detected by IVUS, was virtually absent at 6 months (2+/-5% obstruction volume, GIII) and at 12 months (GI=2+/-5% and GII=2+/-3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents 1 year after implantation.

Effect of sirolimus on the metabolism of apoB100- containing lipoproteins in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus (Rapamune, rapamycin, RAPA) is a potent immunosuppressive drug that has reduced the rate of acute rejection episodes by more than 40% in phase III trials when added to an immunosuppression regimen of cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone. However, RAPA treatment tends to increase lipid levels, particularly among patients with pre-existing hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

To identify the metabolic pathway(s) leading to RAPA-mediated hyperlipidemia, five patients with renal transplants maintained on CsA+/-prednisone+/- azathioprine (AZA) were studied before and after 6 weeks of treatment with RAPA (off RAPA and on RAPA, respectively). Each study patient was infused with a single bolus of [2H4]-lysine to derive metabolic parameters for apoB100-containing lipoproteins by using kinetic analysis based upon quantitation of isotopic enrichment by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Serial lipid measurements revealed that four patients displayed increased plasma triglyceride levels after RAPA treatment, which coincided with significantly higher plasma VLDL-apoB100 concentrations (21.7+/-12.1 mg/dl off RAPA vs. 38.7+/-14.8 mg/dl on RAPA, mean+/-SD, P<0.05). Kinetic analysis showed that the RAPA-induced increase in VLDL-apoB100 concentrations was due to a significant reduction in the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) apoB100 (0.83+/-0.65 off RAPA vs. 0.24+/-0.10 on RAPA, mean+/-SD, P<0.05), rather than an enhanced VLDL-apoB100 synthesis. In one patient, RAPA treatment induced hypercholesterolemia but not hypertriglyceridemia. This hypercholesterolemia was due to elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, which coincided with a decreased FCR of LDL-apoB100. Heparin-induced lipoprotein lipase activity was significantly lower in the immunosuppressed hyperlipidemic patients than in normolipidemic controls. However, RAPA treatment did not significantly alter basal lipoprotein lipase activity in renal transplant patients in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that for renal transplant patients in whom RAPA treatment induces hyperlipidemia, this effect is the result of reduced catabolism of apoB100-containing lipoproteins.

Safety and efficacy of TOR inhibitors and other immunosuppressive regimens in African-American renal transplant recipients

African-American renal transplant recipients have higher rates of acute allograft rejection and lower rates of allograft survival compared with Caucasian patients, and these differences have not been eliminated by a new generation of potent immunosuppressive drugs. In particular, African-Americans tend to exhibit higher rejection rates after withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy. Based on promising early results using the combination of sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus in liver, kidney-pancreas, and islet-cell transplant recipients, our center is conducting a pilot study of this immunosuppression regimen in African-American patients. As of April 2001, there has been only 1 acute rejection episode (2.8%) in this cohort. Long-term follow-up of these patients will be necessary to assess the benefits and risks of this regimen.

Safety and efficacy of TOR inhibitors in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Information about the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of target of rapamycin (TOR) inhibitors, such as sirolimus and everolimus, in pediatric renal transplant recipients is limited. In an ascending single-dose pharmacokinetic study of sirolimus in pediatric dialysis patients, no clinically significant association was observed between patient age and absorption of sirolimus from the gastrointestinal tract. However, young pediatric patients (5 to 11 years of age) exhibited significantly greater apparent oral clearances, suggesting that pediatric patients require slightly higher doses than do adults when adjusted for body weight or surface area. Similarly, in studies performed in pediatric renal transplant recipients, the half-life of sirolimus was shorter and the clearance was greater in younger patients. On the other hand, in single-dose pharmacokinetic studies of everolimus, the apparent clearance was reduced in pediatric renal transplant recipients compared with clearance in adults. This reduced clearance was attributed to a smaller apparent volume of distribution in pediatric patients, rather than to a difference in terminal half-life. This suggested that, although the adult 12-hour dosing interval was appropriate for pediatric patients, they would require reduced dosing based on body size compared with adults. In a large trial (N = 719) of sirolimus versus azathioprine in combination with cyclosporine microemulsion and prednisone, 6 pediatric patients (13 to 18 years of age) received sirolimus at 2 mg/d, 3 received sirolimus at 5 mg/d, and 3 received azathioprine. Seven of the nine patients who received sirolimus experienced no rejection episodes. Six infectious episodes occurred in the 6 patients receiving sirolimus at 2 mg/d, 10 episodes occurred in the 3 patients receiving sirolimus at 5 mg/d, and 8 episodes occurred in the 3 patients receiving azathioprine. At 6 months after transplantation, renal function was similar in all 3 groups, although there was a statistically nonsignificant increase in the group receiving sirolimus at 5 mg/d. The mean cholesterol and triglyceride levels were generally comparable in all 3 groups. TOR inhibitors are promising agents for the prevention of graft rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients, but more pharmacokinetic data are required to assess the optimal dosing regimens in this population. In addition, further data are needed on the efficacy and safety of TOR inhibitors in combination with other agents in pediatric transplantation recipients to best assess the role of TOR inhibition in corticosteroid and/or calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens.

Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for calcineurin-free immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitors, such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus, have been available for almost 20 years. Although these drugs are highly effective and represent the mainstay of transplant immunosuppression, they are associated with acute and chronic nephrotoxicity. Acute nephrotoxicity, which occurs in the early period after transplantation, leads to a higher rate of dialysis, and chronic nephrotoxicity may eventually result in graft loss. Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity is becoming more common as the use of marginal kidneys for transplantation increases. Two recently available immunosuppressive agents, mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (rapamycin), have no nephrotoxicity. The use of these drugs in combination with other agents has led to the development of new paradigms of immunosuppressive therapy. This paper reviews the results of clinical trials that have investigated these new approaches to immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.

The development of sirolimus: The University of Texas-Houston experience

The transplant team at The University of Texas-Houston has studied sirolimus from preclinical through pivotal Phase III trials to single-center Phase IV trials as we continue to refine algorithms for sirolimus therapy. The sirolimus/CsA combination produces a marked reduction in the occurrence and severity of acute allograft rejection episodes. A recently completed post hoc median effect analysis of drug blood concentrations displayed by patients in the 2 pivotal Phase III trials documented that the combination displays synergistic interactions. Patients in the sirolimus/CsA arms did not display an increased incidence of infectious or malignant complications. However, they did experience a range of nonimmune toxicities, including potentiation of putatively CsA-related adverse reactions, such as renal dysfunction and hypercholesterolemia, which appear to be mitigated by reduction or elimination of CsA. However, thrombocytopenia and to a lesser extent leukopenia and anemia appear to be sirolimus-related side effects. The occurrence and severity of these adverse reactions seem to be avoided or ameliorated in most patients by optimizing sirolimus exposure at concentrations (15 ng/mL or by dose reduction. Sirolimus thus appears to be a potent and unique agent for developing new immunosuppressive strategies in organ transplantation.

Characteristics of sirolimus-associated interstitial pneumonitis in renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus, a promising new immunosuppressive drug for organ transplantation, is currently associated with side effects, such as thrombocytopenia and hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

Eight renal transplant recipients, who developed unexplained interstitial pneumonitis during sirolimus therapy, were extensively re-screened for all causes of pneumonitis.

RESULTS

Interstitial pneumonitis was constantly characterized by bilateral interstitial infiltrates on chest x-rays and lung computed tomography scans, with marked general symptoms in all patients but one. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) disclosed lymphocytic alveolitis (mainly of the CD4 type) in seven patients and alveolar hemorrhage in one. Transbronchial lung biopsies, performed in two patients, showed bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia combined with lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis. Pulmonary infections were ruled out by specific stainings and cultures of BAL, bronchial aspirates, and blood cultures. After the elimination of all possible causes, sirolimus-induced pneumonitis was considered probable. Discontinuation of sirolimus in seven cases and dose reduction in the remaining case dramatically improved clinical and radiological status within a few weeks and led to complete resolution within 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus is very probably responsible for interstitial pneumonitis on the following grounds: (a) occurrence of pneumonitis during sirolimus therapy; (b) absence of any other causes; and (c) resolution within 3 months of sirolimus discontinuation or dose reduction. Sirolimus should now be added to the list of possible causes of pulmonary complications after renal transplantation. Discontinuation or dose reduction of sirolimus led to complete and lasting resolution of symptoms.

Sirolimus allows early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplantation resulting in improved renal function and lower blood pressure

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated whether cyclosporine (CsA) could be eliminated from a sirolimus (Rapamune, rapamycin, SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen at 3 months.

METHODS

This was an open-label study conducted in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Upon enrollment, 525 primary (90%) or secondary (10%) renal allograft recipients with cadaveric (89%) or living (11%) donors received 2 mg of sirolimus (troughs>5 ng/ml), CsA, and steroids. At 3 months+/-2 weeks, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to remain on SRL-CsA-ST or to have CsA withdrawn and therapy continued with SRL (troughs 20-30 ng/ml)-ST.

RESULTS

At 12 months, overall graft and patient survival were 89.1% and 94.9%, respectively. In the 430 (82%) randomized patients, there was no difference in graft survival (95.8% vs. 97.2%, SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST) or patient survival (97.2% vs. 98.1%, respectively). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed primary acute rejection was 13.1% during the prerandomization period. After randomization, the acute rejection rates were 4.2% and 9.8% for SRL-CsA-ST and SRL-ST, respectively (P=0.035). Renal function (calculated glomerular filtration rate, 57 vs. 63 ml/min, P<0.001) and blood pressure significantly improved when CsA was withdrawn. Hypertension, CsA nephrotoxicity, hyperuricemia, and Herpes zoster occurred statistically more frequently in patients remaining on CsA, whereas thrombocytopenia, abnormal liver function tests, and hypokalemia were reported more often for SRL-ST therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sirolimus, CsA, and steroids for 3 months posttransplant, followed by elimination of CsA, is a safe and effective alternative to continuous therapy with sirolimus, CsA, and steroids that can result in better renal function and lower blood pressure.

Sirolimus for rescue and primary immunosuppression in transplanted children receiving tacrolimus

AIMS

The role of sirolimus (SRL) as a rescue agent (n=42) and as a component of primary immunosuppression (n=8) was evaluated in a mixed population of 50 transplanted children receiving tacrolimus (liver: 26, heart: 5, intestinal: 5, liver-intestine: 9, lung: 1, bone marrow: 1, liver-kidney: 1, multivisceral: 1). Rescue indications for tacrolimus (TAC) failure were recurrent acute rejection and acute rejection complicating withdrawal of immunosuppression in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Rescue indications for TAC toxicity were nephrotoxicity, pancreatitis, seizures, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and graft-versus-host disease.

RESULTS

Mean age at rescue was 11.5 years and mean follow-up was 204 (range 18-800) days. As primary immunosuppression, SRL+TAC prevented early acute rejection in 7/8 children. The indication for rescue resolved in 33/42 children. In children with TAC toxicity, this was associated with decrease in TAC doses by 50%, significant improvements in renal function, and continuing decline in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load in PTLD patients. Serious adverse events led to discontinuation of SRL in 9/42 rescue patients, 3 of them also experienced acute rejection. Three additional children also experienced acute rejection on SRL therapy (overall incidence 6/50, 12%). Pharmacokinetic analysis in the first week of SRL administration suggested a short half-life (11.8+/-5.5 hr, n=21).

CONCLUSIONS

SRL and reduced-dose TAC may achieve adequate immunosuppression without compromising renal function or enhancing EBV viremia significantly.

Everolimus. Novartis

Everolimus (RAD-001, SDZ RAD, Certican), an analog of sirolimus, is an oral immunosuppressant that inhibits growth factor-induced cell proliferation, under development by Novartis as a potential treatment for transplant rejection. Phase III trials were initiated by the end of 1998 [319337] and were ongoing in February 2001 [400448]. At the end of 2000, Novartis was hoping to file for approval of the compound in 2001 [392881], with a possible launch in mild-2002 [392881], [401979]. Completion of phase III trials in heart transplant patients is expected this year and lung and liver transplants by 2003. In 1999, American Home Products (AHP) initiated an action for infringement of the patent EP-00401747, which covers the use of sirolimus in transplantation in the UK, the Netherlands and Germany, seeking to restrain the clinical trial program for everolimus. Novartis subsequently filed a counterclaim for invalidity. In December 1999, the UK High Court of Justice ruled that everolimus infringes the British counterpart of EP-00401747 [349637]. In contrast, in April 2000, the District Court of The Hague ruled that everolimus does not infringe patent rights licensed to AHP [362823] and in July 2000, The Court of Appeal in the UK came to the same conclusion [376559]. In February 2001, the Opposition Board at the European Patent Office upheld Novartis' European patent for everolimus, which the Board held to be 'inventive' [400448]. In July 2000, Vontobel estimated sales of SFr 80 million in 2002, rising to SFr 800 million in 2004 [378871]. In February 2001, Merrill Lynch predicted sales of SFr 125 million rising to SFr 661 million in 2005 [411704].

[mTOR and FTY 720 inhibitors]

SIROLIMUS: The leading member of the mTOR inhibitor family, sirolimus or rapamycin, has dose-dependent side effects that can generally be well controlled. Sirolimus can be combined with tacrolimus at therapeutic doses; likewise for the sirolimus-cyclosporine combination at moderate dosage. Effective plasma concentrations of sirolimus vary from 5 to 20 ng/ml depending on the combination of immunosuppressant agents used. Sirolimus has been shown to inhibit metastatic diffusion of renal adenocarcinoma in the mouse. Its complex side effects on angiogenesis, fibrosis processes and chronic rejection are still being investigated. EVEROLIMUS: Everolimus, or RAD, has a very short half-life, but induces fewer hematologic effects. The therapeutic dose must reach at least 3 ng/ml to prevent rejection. Doses above 15 ng/ml increase the risk of thrombocytopenia. FTY 720: A new immunosuppressant agent, FTY 720, does not belong to any known family. It has a totally different mechanism of action compared with currently available immunosuppressants. FTY 720 increases the expression of chemokine receptors on the surface of T cells making them unavailable for the rejection reaction. FTY 720 has a very long half-life (108 hours). Due to its particular liver metabolism, there is a very low risk of drug interactions.

Efficacy of sirolimus (rapamycin) administered concomitantly with a subtherapeutic dose of cyclosporin in the treatment of severe psoriasis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The identification of a highly potent immunosuppressive/antiproliferative agent with an acceptable toxicity profile has long been a goal for the management of severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus (Rapamune) for severe psoriasis when given alone or in association with cyclosporin.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, eight parallel group, pilot study in 24 out-patient centres in seven European countries, 150 patients, 18 years and older, with severe chronic plaque psoriasis were given sirolimus 0.5, 1.5 and 3.0 mg m(-2) daily for 8 weeks, either alone or in association with a subtherapeutic dose of cyclosporin (1.25 mg kg(-1) daily). Cyclosporin 5 mg kg(-1) daily was the positive control and cyclosporin 1.25 mg kg(-1) daily the negative control. The primary efficacy variable was the mean percentage reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters and sirolimus/cyclosporin blood concentrations.

RESULTS

The greatest mean percentage decreases in PASI were seen with cyclosporin 5.0 mg kg(-1) daily (70.5%) and with sirolimus 3.0 mg m(-2) daily + cyclosporin 1.25 mg kg(-1) daily (63.7%). Both groups demonstrated significantly better results than cyclosporin 1.25 mg kg(-1) daily (mean decrease 33.4%). Serum creatinine levels were significantly lower for groups with sirolimus alone and sirolimus plus reduced-dose cyclosporin when compared with cyclosporin 5.0 mg kg(-1) daily. Adverse events associated with sirolimus included thrombocytopenia (5%), hyperlipidaemia (9%), aphthous stomatitis (9%) and acne (13%), whereas adverse events associated with cyclosporin included hot flushes (12%), hyperlipidaemia (9%) and increased serum creatinine (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant administration of sirolimus with a subtherapeutic dose of cyclosporin in severe psoriasis may permit a reduction in their respective toxicities, notably cyclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Influence of cyclosporin, tacrolimus and rapamycin on renal function and arterial hypertension after renal transplantation

Cyclosporin and tacrolimus have improved survival figures in organ transplantation. However, both drugs are potentially nephrotoxic. The immunosuppressive and nephrotoxic effects of both drugs appear to depend on the inhibition of calcineurin. Cyclosporin and tacrolimus cause acute (functional changes) and chronic nephrotoxicity (structural lesions in the kidney). These last important lesions include arteriolar hyalinosis, stripped interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. It is possible that repeated episodes of renal ischaemia contribute to the development of chronic nephrotoxicity and then chronic allograft nephropathy. Cyclosporin and tacrolimus also induce arterial hypertension. Therefore, the beneficial effects of immunosuppression have been limited due to nephrotoxicity and arterial hypertension. Rapamycin, a novel immunosuppressive agent, that does not inhibit calcineurin, provides immunosuppression without nephrotoxicity. In fact, in the trials performed in Europe, sirolimus-treated immunosuppression patients exhibited a much better renal function than cyclosporin-treated patients. However, sirolimus can potentiate the nephrotoxic effect of cyclosporin. Therefore, when cyclosporin and sirolimus are used in combination, a reduction of the cyclosporin dose is desirable.

Orthotopic liver transplantation using low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus

Although sirolimus (SRL) binds the immunophilin FK506-binding protein-12 (FKBP-12) with greater avidity than tacrolimus (TAC), animal studies have shown that SRL and TAC act synergistically to prevent rejection. Dose-related toxicity is more often the cause of TAC discontinuation than rejection. We hypothesized that SRL would allow for a substantial reduction in the concomitant dose of TAC after liver transplantation to levels less than the threshold for toxicity. A series of 56 liver transplant recipients were administered a combination of SRL and TAC (target trough levels, 7 and 5 ng/mL, respectively). Planned weaning of steroids commenced after 3 months. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were undertaken. Patient and graft survival were 52 patients (93%) and 51 grafts (91%), with a follow-up of 23 months (range, 6 to 35 months). One episode (1.8%) of hepatic artery thrombosis was seen. The rate of acute cellular rejection was 14%. No extra treatment was administered in 3 of 8 patients, and the other 5 episodes responded to a single course of steroids. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 4 patients (7%). Renal function, glucose control, and lipid metabolism are near normal in 47 patients (84%) without additional medication. Steroid elimination is completed in 51 patients (91%). Bioavailability of SRL and TAC varied between transplant recipients, but trough levels strongly correlated with the area under the curve (r(2) = 0.82 and r(2) = 0.84, respectively). Simultaneous administration did not affect the PK profile of the drugs at this dose. The ratio of trough level to daily dose correlated between SRL and TAC. The synergistic effect seen in animal models also occurs in clinical liver transplant recipients on SRL-TAC combination immunosuppression. A low-dose combination of SRL and TAC should be compared with conventional immunosuppression in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Sirolimus-associated eyelid edema in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressant sirolimus is effective in preventing acute rejection episodes. So far, unusual edema formation has not been reported as a side effect.

METHODS

Two groups of patients with renal transplants, consisting of 11 patients each, were followed for up to 29 months. The immunosuppressive regimen was either sirolimus and prednisone with or without cyclosporine or azathioprine/mycophenolate and prednisone with cyclosporine. Routine follow-up included a thorough clinical investigation. Edema formation was documented photographically.

RESULTS

In 5 of the 11 patients treated with sirolimus uni- or bilateral, non-itching, eyelid edema was observed. After discontinuation of sirolimus, lid edema disappeared. The duration until recovery varied from weeks to months. No cause of edema formation other than the treatment with sirolimus was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe eyelid edema formation seems to be associated with sirolimus treatment. The underlying mechanism is unknown.

Median effect analysis of efficacy versus adverse effects of immunosuppressants

BACKGROUND

A rigorous model to describe concentration-effect relations-the median effect analysis-was applied to quantitate immunosuppressive versus adverse effects in human renal transplantation.

METHODS

The median effect equation was used to analyze data collected from three clinical studies, including the two phase III blinded, placebo-controlled trials (n = 1295 patients) of sirolimus versus azathioprine or placebo treatment added to a cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin)/prednisone regimen and a sirolimus/azathioprine/prednisone (in the absence of cyclosporine) phase II cohort (n = 41 patients).

RESULTS

The clinical effects correlated with drug concentrations as expressed by the median effect equation. Sirolimus or cyclosporine alone permitted drug concentrations that were 5-fold and 2.2-fold lower, respectively, to render 90% of patients rejection-free, suggesting a synergistic interaction between the two drugs. Further, the sirolimus concentrations to render 50% of patients rejection-free were about 200-fold and 60-fold less, respectively, than the concentration that caused 50% of patients to experience thrombocytopenia or hypertriglyceridemia. The correlation coefficient of the median effect analysis for the occurrence of hypercholesterolemia was more robust for sirolimus than for cyclosporine. Although the concentrations for 50% of patients rendered rejection-free versus 50% affected by hypercholesterolemia were similar, a 7-fold difference was calculated between the concentrations at which 90% of patients were free of rejection versus patients who were affected by hypercholesterolemia.

CONCLUSION

The median effect analysis proffers a useful tool to assess both drug interactions and the windows between therapeutic versus toxic effects of immunosuppressive agents. The current analysis suggests a synergistic interaction between sirolimus and cyclosporine.

Sirolimus rescue therapy for refractory rejection in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute renal allograft rejection episodes refractory to antilymphocyte preparations almost inevitably progress to transplantation loss. To reverse ongoing rejection processes, we administered sirolimus (RAPA) after failure of conventional immunosuppressive regimens including full courses of antilymphocyte sera.

METHODS

All 36 renal transplantation recipients reported herein displayed either Grade IIB or Grade III biopsy-proven (Banff 1993 criteria) ongoing rejection episodes despite prior treatment with pulse and/or oral recycling of steroids and at least one 14- to 21-day course of murine (OKT3) or equine (ATGAM) antilymphocyte treatment. We compared the actual 12-month outcomes of two demographically similar cohorts of patients treated for refractory rejection with RAPA (Group I; n=24) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Group II; n=12) added to a baseline regimen of cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred).

RESULTS

Rescue therapy reversed the renal dysfunction in 96% of patients in the RAPA group versus 67% in the MMF group (P=0.03) despite the fact that a greater fraction of patients in the RAPA (17 of 24) than the MMF group (6 of 12) had experienced two or more episodes of acute rejection before study entry and the fact that the recurrent bouts of acute rejection occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant in 94% of patients in the RAPA group compared with 50% (P=0.005) in the MMF group. Among the patients who were reversed successfully, the rates of rebound acute rejection were similar (4% vs. 8%). The mean serum creatinine values were slightly, although not significantly, lower among RAPA than MMF patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months: namely, 2.6 vs. 2.8, 2.8 vs. 3.2, 3.0 vs. 3.3, and 2.8 vs. 3.2 mg/dL, respectively. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar: namely, 88% vs. 92% and 83% vs. 67% for the RAPA versus MMF groups.

CONCLUSION

RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection.

Sirolimus improves the two-year outcome of renal allografts in African-American patients

The present study evaluated whether the addition of sirolimus to a cyclosporine (CyA)/prednisone (Pred) regimen mitigated the greater proclivity to acute rejection episodes and graft loss characteristic of African-American renal transplant recipients. Using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests, African-American renal transplant recipients treated with either CyA/Pred (n = 90) or sirolimus/CyA/Pred (n = 47) were compared with 120 Caucasian patients treated with sirolimus/CyA/Pred for 2-year rates of patient and graft survival as well as acute rejection episodes. Mean laboratory values were compared using analysis of variance and F-tests. Addition of sirolimus to the CyA/Pred regimen reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in African-Americans from 43.3% to 19.2% (P = 0.004), a value similar to Caucasian patients. The 97.9% 2-year graft survival rate among 47 African-American patients treated with sirolimus/CyA/Pred was significantly higher than the 85.6% rate shown among the 90 CyA/Pred-treated African-American transplant recipients (P = 0.0479) and similar to that in Caucasians. The 95.7% patient survival rate among the African-American sirolimus/CyA/Pred group was similar to the 97.8% rate in the African-American CyA/Pred cohort. Interestingly, there was no evident toxicity from the addition of sirolimus. The addition of sirolimus to a CyA-based regimen reduced acute rejection episodes and graft loss experienced by African-American renal transplant recipients.

RAD in de novo renal transplantation: comparison of three doses on the incidence and severity of acute rejection

BACKGROUND

The effects of three doses of RAD (40-O-[2-hydroxyethyl]-rapamycin), a novel macrolide with potent immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties, on the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes as well as its tolerability were evaluated in a dose-ranging study in de novo renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study, recipients were randomized to receive 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg/day of RAD in combination with Neoral (cyclosporine, USP MODIFIED) and corticosteroids. The incidence and severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, graft survival, patient survival, infection rates, laboratory measurements, and adverse events were compared across groups after 6 months of therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 103 recipients, patients receiving 1, 2, or 4 mg/day experienced a 32.4%, 14.7%, or 25.7% incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months posttransplantation, respectively. Even though the study was not powered to demonstrate efficacy, the incidence of moderate and severe acute rejection episodes was found to be significantly lower among patients in the 2 mg and 4 mg/day groups than in the 1 mg/day group (P=0.002 and P=0.006, respectively). Overall graft and patient survival rates were excellent. RAD was generally well tolerated. Although blood lipid levels increased in all groups, changes were manageable with lipid-lowering agents and did not warrant discontinuation of study medication. The incidence of viral and fungal infections was low; however, it was higher among recipients treated with 4 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with Neoral and corticosteroids, RAD doses of 2 mg and 4 mg/day resulted in lower rates of acute rejection episodes and efficacy failure than the 1 mg/day dose and were significantly more effective in reducing the severity of rejection. Large-scale, controlled, follow-up studies are currently in progress to confirm these initial findings.

A calcineurin antagonist-free induction strategy for immunosuppression in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients at risk for delayed graft function

BACKGROUND

Avoidance of calcineurin antagonists for a prolonged period de novo after cadaver donor renal transplantation may facilitate recovery from delayed graft function. The present study examined the benefit of prolonging the calcineurin antagonist-free interval by administering sirolimus (SRL) in combination with chimeric (c-) anti-interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) monoclonal antibodies (mAb).

METHODS

Three contemporaneous but nonrandomized cohorts were compared for acute rejection episodes, patient and graft survival rates, renal function, and adverse reaction profiles for 12 months. Patients with delayed graft function were treated with either SRL/c-IL-2R mAb/prednisone (Pred) with inception of cyclosporine (CsA) once the serum creatinine value was < or =2.5 mg/dl (n=43; group 1) or anti-lymphocyte preparations/Pred/delayed CsA for 7 to 14 days (n=18; group 3). A third cohort displayed immediate function and was treated de novo with CsA/c-IL-2R mAb/Pred (n=21; group 2).

RESULTS

The incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower among group 1 (16%) compared with groups 2 (52%, P=0.004) or 3 (39%, P=0.05). Among the seven rejection episodes in group 1, six of seven occurred among African-American or retransplant recipients, and a separate cluster of six of seven occurred among patients who displayed SRL trough concentrations < or =9 ng/ml. Furthermore, additional antilymphocyte antibody treatment was required to reverse either steroid-resistant or Banff grades II or III acute rejection episodes among 14%, 55% (P=0.08), and 71% (P=0.03) of patients in each group, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates, as well as mean serum creatinine values, were similar at 12 months among the three groups. However, group 1 patients displayed higher serum cholesterol and triglyceride values, as well as lower hemoglobin, platelet, and leukocyte values compared with the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that a SRL/c-IL-2R mAb/Pred induction regimen provides excellent acute rejection prophylaxis.

Liver transplantation using sirolimus and minimal corticosteroids (3-day taper)

At our center, we have performed liver transplantation since 1995 with a rapid-taper steroid protocol (weaning steroids by day 14 posttransplantation). Beginning in 2000, we further reduced the use of corticosteroids to 3 days and added sirolimus to our immunosuppressive regimen. We report our experience with 39 patients who underwent liver transplantation with either tacrolimus or cyclosporin A (Neoral; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Summit, NJ) and sirolimus, with a 3-day tapered dose of corticosteroids. Thirty-two patients received a cadaveric graft and 7 patients received a right hepatic lobe from a living donor. All patients initially were administered either tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/d) or cyclosporin A (10 mg/kg/d) and sirolimus (6 mg/d for 1 day, followed by 2 mg/d), in addition to methylprednisolone on the first 3 days (1, 0.5, and 0.5 g/d) after transplantation. Patients were administered corticosteroids for presumptive or biopsy-proven evidence of acute cellular rejection (methylprednisolone, 1, 0.5, and 0.5 g on 3 successive days). Seventeen patients were administered tacrolimus and 22 patients were administered cyclosporin A. Six patients were excluded from analysis because they were administered sirolimus for less than 2 weeks. Mean duration of follow-up was 124 days. Patient survival was 36 of 39 patients (92%), and graft survival was 35 of 39 grafts (89%). Ten of 33 patients (30%) experienced 12 episodes of rejection (7 biopsy proven, 5 presumptive) compared with 70% in historical controls (P <.01). OKT3 was required in 1 of 33 patients (3%) compared with 37% in controls (P <.01). Twenty-six of 33 patients (79%) were not administered prednisone, and 7 of 33 patients (21%) were administered prednisone for reasons other than rejection. Posttransplantation, there was no significant change in values for creatinine, glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, cholesterol, and white blood cell counts. Platelet counts were significantly reduced, and hematocrits were significantly elevated (P <.05). Liver transplantation may be successfully performed with minimal use of corticosteroids by using sirolimus and either tacrolimus or cyclosporin A. Despite the absence of prednisone from our immunosuppressive protocol, the incidence of rejection and OKT3 use was lower than in historical controls. Patient and graft survival rates were identical to those of historical controls. The findings in this report will serve as the basis for a formal trial evaluating the efficacy of sirolimus in liver transplantation.

Impaired phosphate handling of renal allografts is aggravated under rapamycin-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Impaired phosphate handling of the renal allograft is a common problem and of multifactorial origin. The aim of the study was to elucidate whether a rapamycin- or a mycophenolate-based immunosuppressive therapy aggravates the renal phosphate leak in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Renal phosphate handling was determined in thirty-eight cadaveric allograft recipients, with good renal function at 8, 12, 20 and 28 weeks after transplantation. Nineteen patients (group 1) received triple immunosuppression with rapamycin, cyclosporine and prednisolone, nineteen other transplant recipients received mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine and prednisolone immunosuppression (group 2), and six healthy subjects (group 3) served as controls. After 12 weeks of stable graft function, group 1 patients were divided further into two subgroups. Ten patients were kept on their immunosuppressive regimen (group 1A), whereas the remaining nine randomly chosen subjects had their cyclosporine withdrawn; they were thus maintained on a dual immunosuppression regimen with prednisolone and a higher dosage of rapamycin (group 1B).

RESULTS

Renal phosphate reabsorption was significantly lower in group 1 at 8 and 12 weeks after transplantation as compared with groups 2 and 3. At 20 weeks after transplantation, patients with rapamycin-based immunosuppression (groups 1A and 1B) continued to exhibit hypophosphataemia and impaired renal phosphate handling. Group 1B had the lowest TmP/ GFR compared with all groups. At 28 weeks, renal phosphate reabsorption and plasma phosphate levels were no longer different between patient groups and controls.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that rapamycin-based immunosuppression prolongs the phosphate leak of the allografted kidney, leading to low serum phosphate levels during the first weeks after transplantation.