Respiratory allergy to peach leaves and lipid-transfer proteins

BACKGROUND

Several lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs) have been identified as important food allergens, especially in fruits of the Rosaceae family. The major peach (Prunus persica) allergen has been identified, sequenced and designated Pru p 3.

OBJECTIVE

To present Pru p 3 as an aeroallergen able to induce occupational asthma.

METHODS

A thorough investigation was performed in a fruit grower with occupational asthma. Skin prick-prick tests with peach leaves and prick tests with perennial respiratory allergens and pollens, fruits and peach leaf extracts were done. Serum-specific IgE was tested for peach leaf, peach fruit, peach skin and respiratory allergens that were positive in skin prick tests. Specific bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) with extracts of peach leaf were also done. Before and 24 h after the BPT, BPTs with methacholine and sputum induction were done. The IgE reactivity pattern to peach leaf and fruit extracts and to Pru p 3 was identified by using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Blotting inhibition of peach leaf extract by Pru p 3 was also performed. The putative allergen was quantified in leaf and fruit skin extracts with ELISA based on an anti-Pru p 3 antibody.

RESULTS

Skin tests were positive for peach leaf and fruit. The BPT was positive, with immediate and delayed response. This test induced a decrease in PD20 (dose of agonist that induces a 20% fall in FEV1) methacholine and an increase in eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in sputum. Peach leaf extract contained concentrations of Pru p 3 similar to those found in peach skin. Specific IgE immunodetection showed that patient's sera reacted with Pru p 3, and with a single major band from the peach leaf extract fully inhibited by Pru p 3.

CONCLUSION

Pru p 3 from peach leaves can act as a respiratory allergen and cause occupational rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma.

Diversity of asparagus allergy: clinical and immunological features

BACKGROUND

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is an extensively grown and consumed vegetable. To a lesser extent than other Liliaceae vegetables, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) due to asparagus has been reported. However, only a few case reports of asparagus IgE-mediated allergy have been published. In a previous study, we demonstrated that two lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) (Aspa o 1.01 and Aspa o 1.02) were relevant allergens of asparagus.

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively analysed the 27 patients diagnosed with asparagus allergy during the last 5 years. All of them reported adverse symptoms after either asparagus ingestion or handling. We describe their clinical features and evaluate whether they were associated to immunological findings (immunoblot pattern and skin reactivity to LTPs).

METHODS

Patients underwent skin prick and patch tests with standard panels of vegetables and aeroallergens. Besides crude asparagus extract, two purified LTPs were prick and patch tested. Total and specific IgE measurements and asparagus extract IgE immunoblotting were performed. Patients reporting asthma symptoms underwent specific inhalation challenge to asparagus.

RESULTS

Of the 27 subjects, eight had ACD, 17 had IgE-mediated allergy and two had both ACD- and IgE-mediated allergy. Positive patch tests with the crude asparagus extract but not with LTPs were observed in subjects with ACD (n=10). Of 19 patients with IgE-mediated disease, 10 had contact urticaria after asparagus handling. Of them, five subjects and five others without skin allergy showed respiratory symptoms; of them, eight were diagnosed with occupational asthma confirmed by positive asparagus inhalation challenge, whereas the remaining two had isolated rhinitis. Four patients suffered from immediate allergic reactions related to asparagus ingestion (food allergy); three of them reported anaphylaxis whereas the other had oral allergic syndrome. Positive IgE immunoblotting (bands of 15 and 45-70 kDa) was observed in 10 subjects. Of 10 subjects with positive prick test to LTPs, six showed bands at 15 kDa. Either IgE-binding bands or positive prick tests to LTPs were observed in asthma (62%) and anaphylaxis (67%).

CONCLUSION

Asparagus is a relevant source of occupational allergy inducing ACD and also IgE-mediated reactions. Severe disease (anaphylaxis or asthma) is common and LTPs seem to play a major role. The clinical relevance of LTP sensitization among patients with mild disease or symptom-free subjects should be addressed in prospective studies.

Olerance of a cluster schedule with a house dust mite extract quantified in mass units: multicentre study

The standardisation of allergenic extracts in micrograms of the major allergen has encouraged the search for new treatment schedules, with the purpose of shortening the number of visits and doses required to reach the maintenance dose without eliciting a greater risk of adverse reactions for the patients. With this objective, a prospective multicentre pharmacovigilance study was designed that included 200 patient with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and/or allergic asthma sensitised to mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinu and/or farinae). The dose increment period was carried out using a cluster schedule, where the optimal dose wa reached after 4 visits, administering two doses in each visit. The duration of the study was 5 months and a total o 1902 doses were administered. At the end of the trial, 31 adverse reactions in 23 patients were recorded. Six of these were systemic (0.3% of t administered doses) recorded in 6 patients (3% of the sample). One was an immediate reaction (grade 1) and delayed (4 mild and 1 moderate). Two were asthmatic exacerbations, 2 cutaneous reactions, 1 rhinitis and 1 an unspecific symptom (not IgE-mediated). Two appeared upon administration of the first vial and the remaining 4 after administration of the third cluster. Therefore, the schedule tested presents an adequate tolerance profile, suggesting savings (compared to th conventional schedule of 13 doses per patient) of 1800 visits and 1000 treatment doses in the whole study.

[Atopic dermatitis in paediatric practice]

Atopic dermatitis is the most frequent dermatitis amongst children under 11 years of age. It is an inflammatory cutaneous disease, chronic and recurrent, and it involves numerous outbreaks and relapses that affect the child, and hence his family milieu, generally for several years. Its chronic character and the lack of fully satisfactory therapies force the primary care paediatrician to consider this entity as a factor conditioning the quality of life of the patients and as a warning sign for the possible development of other allergic processes. As we do not have a curative treatment available, special relevance is assumed by family collaboration, by the measures for preventing relapses and by efficacy in their symptomatic treatment.

[Sublingual immunotherapy in children. Immunotherapy Committee of the Spanish Society for Clinical Immunology and Pediatric Allergology]

Sublingual immunotherapy is currently attracting growing interest because of its ease of administration and, according to previous studies, its infrequent and mild adverse effects. However, at least in children, the efficacy of this therapy has not been completely demonstrated. In addition, the mechanisms of action remain to be elucidated since few studies have been published and the results have been contradictory and sometimes inconclusive. For this reason, we performed a literature review through the MEDLINE database, selecting double-blind studies carried out in children. Only 10 studies meeting these requirements were retrieved. All the studies were performed by European researchers and nine were published in European journals. Efficacy was evaluated by clinical parameters and by reduction in medication use. The results on efficacy are not homogeneous, although most support the utility of this route of administration. Moreover, reports of allergens other than those used in these studies dust mites and grass pollens are lacking. In conclusion, further studies evaluating the efficacy of this therapy in children are required. Among the general population, if the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of sensitization to hymenoptera venoms were demonstrated, as has been the case with subcutaneous immunotherapy, the utility of this route of administration would be definitively confirmed. Finally, sublingual immunotherapy could be used in children who have shown systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy or who refuse to undergo injections.

[Local immunotherapy]

Specific immunotherapy, together with avoidance of the allergen and symptomatic treatment, forms part of the treatment of allergic pathology. The oldest, best known and most studied form is subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), whose efficacy, both in the short and the long term, has been widely demonstrated in numerous studies. However, in spite of having been shown to be safe, it is not free of adverse effects and must be administered under the supervision of medical personnel. This has encouraged the search for new ways of administration of similar efficacy, with a good safety profile and good adherence on the patient's side. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is the most relevant of the different alternatives studied. In this alternative the antigen is administered in the form of drops under the tongue. There are different dosages of administration depending on the allergen involved. The optimum treatment dose has still to be determined, at present a wide range of dosages are found in comparison with subcutaneous immunotherapy. Its mechanism of action is little known although immunological changes have been observed in different studies. SLIT has shown a good safety profile with scarce secondary effects, normally of a local character. Similarly, different clinical tests have been carried out in which its efficacy has been shown in the treatment of respiratory allergy both in children and in adults. For this reason, although there are still unresolved data concerning this way of administering the immunotherapy, it has been proposed by the WHO as a valid alternative to SCIT.

Tolerance of a cluster schedule on the treatment of seasonal allergic respiratory disease with pollen extracts quantified in mass units

In order to evaluate the tolerance of a cluster schedule on specific immunotherapy (SIT), 306 patients were included in a multicenter study. The patients were suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma, caused by sensitization to olive and/or grass pollen. SIT was administered subcutaneously according to a cluster schedule in which the maintenance dose is reached after four visits (3 weeks). The extracts were biologically standardized with major allergens quantified in mass units. Local reactions appeared in 7.2% of the patients and 1.3% of the doses. Systemic reactions (SR) were recorded in 1.2% of the doses administered to 9.5% of the patients. No anaphylactic shock was registered, and all the SR responded fully and rapidly to treatment. There was no difference in SR according to diagnosis or allergen extract used. The majority of SR occurred with the administration of vial of higher concentration (Vial 2: 7 SR (22%), Vial 3: 32 SR (78%), p < 0.05). Of the 32 SR recorded with Vial 3, 13 (41%) were immediate, with no existing association between dose administered and appearance of SR. However, of the 18 delayed SR (56%), 14 occurred after the administration of the first two doses of Vial 3 and four occurred after administration of the second two doses (78% vs 22%, p < 0.05). On the other hand, this regime realized an important saving in cost and time compared to the conventional schedule (1581 fewer doses and 2754 fewer visits were necessary to reach the optimal dose). Considering all these factors, the clinical profile of the proposed regime may be qualified as good. However, future studies are necessary in order to better adjust the schedule to avoid the delayed SR that occurred after the administration of the first two doses of Vial 3.

[Asthma and allergy due to carmine dye]

Cochineal carmine, or simply carmine (E120), is a red colouring that is obtained from the dried bodies of the female insect Dactylopius coccus Costa (the cochineal insect). We have evaluated the prevalence of sensitization and asthma caused by carmine in a factory using natural colouring, following the diagnosis of two workers with occupational asthma. The accumulated incidence of sensitization and occupational asthma due to carmine in this factory are 48.1% and 18.5% respectively, figures that make the introduction of preventive measures obligatory. Occupational asthma caused by inhaling carmine should be considered as a further example of the capacity of certain protein particles of arthropods (in this case cochineal insects) to act as aeroallergens. Carmine should be added to the list of agents capable of producing occupational asthma, whose mechanism, according to our studies, would be immunological mediated by IgE antibodies in the face of diverse allergens of high molecular weight, which can vary from patient to patient. Nonetheless, given the existence of different components in carmine, it cannot be ruled out that substances of low molecular weight, such as carminic acid, might act as haptenes. Besides, since we are dealing with a colouring that is widely used as a food additive, as a pharmaceutical excipient and in the composition of numerous cosmetics, it is not surprising that allergic reactions can appear both through ingestion and through direct cutaneous contact. We find ourselves facing a new example of an allergen that can act through both inhalation and digestion, giving rise to an allergolical syndrome that can show itself clinically with expressions of both respiratory allergy and alimentary allergy.

[Treatment of allergy to mushrooms]

The treatment of patients with respiratory allergy is based on environmental control measures, pharmacological and immunotherapy treatment. The third cause of allergic respiratory disease in our environment is mushrooms, the most frequently involved being the Alternaria class. However, due to the great difficulties in their diagnosis and specific treatment, there are few controlled studies on immunotherapy with mushroom extracts. A clinical test was carried out with a suitable, biologically standardized extract for the diagnosis and treatment of patients allergic to Alternaria. A second phase determined the maximum tolerated dosage of this extract administered through immunotherapy, in depot preparation and in conventional dosage, which was 0.1 mg/ml of Alt a I. This dosage was established as the maintenance dosage in the following phase (double blind test controlled with placebo), in which the efficacy and safety of the immunotherapy with this extract was determined, administered in immunotherapy to the mentioned maintenance dosage, to 28 patients with rhinitis and/or asthma due to allergy to Alternaria. All the patients reached the pre-established maintenance dosage of 1670 BSU. The treatment proved efficient, producing an improvement in the symptoms, respiratory function, subjective evaluation of patient and doctor, and severity of the disease. The immunological response supported the clinical efficacy, with an increase in the IgG and a fall in the IgE over the course of the study. Tolerance to the treatment was excellent, with only two light systemic reactions registered in the 711 dosages administered (0.28% reactions/dosages administered).

[New techniques in the study of asthma]

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that is functionally characterized by variability of lung function and bronchial hyper-responsiveness. Its diagnosis and management is commonly hampered by the lack of objective parameters. This article reviews additional techniques for evaluating both, lung function (bronchial challenge with adenosin-monophosphate, lung resistance measurement by either the impulse oscillometry system or whole body pletismography) and bronchial immuno-inflammatory response (induced sputum, condensates of exhaled air, monitoring of nitric oxide in exhaled air), as well as our experience with them.

[Anaphylaxis]

Anaphylaxis is a potentially mortal, underdiagnosed clinical picture. The most frequent triggering agents are drugs and foodstuffs. The first therapeutic option, adrenaline, although clearly indicated, is not carried out with the desired frequency due basically to the high number of cases of anaphylaxis that are not diagnosed as such. In patients with a first episode of anaphylaxis, posterior aetiological diagnosis is crucial to avoid the appearance of new episodes. The only case of anaphylaxis in which immunotherapy with the allergen must be evaluated, is that in which the causal agent is the poison of hymenopters.

[Perspectives in the treatment of allergy to latex: immunotherapy]

At present, allergy to latex is an important problem due to the severity of the symptomatology that it produces and the risk groups involved. Complete avoidance of latex is practically impossible, which is why in recent years there has been intense work on standardizing an extract in order not only to improve its clinical diagnosis but also to be able to offer a therapeutic alternative other than avoidance, such as immunotherapy. Since 1998, timely approaches to immunotherapy with latex have been published, with oral desensitization (three patients), subcutaneous (one patient) and sublingual (one patient). In every case there was an evident clinical improvement. At present, subcutaneous immunotherapy with latex, although efficient, is a high risk treatment. Sublingual immunotherapy with latex has recently been commercialized in Spain and we know of its efficacy through the results of an open test on 26 adult patients. The safety expectations are shown to be better than those for subcutaneous immunotherapy.

[Allergy to asparagus]

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a widely grown vegetable; together with garlic, the onion and the leek, it belongs to the Liliaceae family. Both delayed cell-mediated reactions and IgE-mediated reactions secondary to asparagus have been described. While the former (allergic contact dermatitis) are a fairly common cause of occupational disease, only a few case-reports of IgE-mediated reactions have been published. IgE-mediated reactions can be further grouped into food allergy and reactions due to cutaneous or respiratory exposure, which is often occupational. Anaphylaxis is the most common clinical picture of food allergy, while contact urticaria, rhinitis and asthma, appearing either isolated or associated, are clinical pictures of the latter. Sensitization to different allergens is the likely cause of the different clinical pictures due to asparagus. Their detection and early diagnosis is of prime importance due to the different prognosis and treatment. In the present article we resume our experience over the last 5 years.

[Latex. An important aeroallergen involved in occupational asthma]

Latex has become one of the most frequent aetiological agents of occupational asthma in the last decade, especially amongst health personnel. The prevalence of occupational asthma due to latex in the different affected occupations varies between 2.5 and 10%, figures that give an idea of the magnitude of the problem. Latex proteins, absorbed in the dust of cornstarch, used as a lubricant, are responsible for asthma due to latex gloves. This cornstarch dust that covers the inside of the gloves acts as a vehicle for dispersing allergenic proteins. Latex aeroallergens are found in particles of different dimensions. The levels of latex aeroallergens in the environment capable of causing sensitization and of unleashing symptoms are not well defined. The determination of these levels of exposure to latex is complicated, since with latex one is dealing with a complex mixture of allergens with differing stability and bio-availability. The bioaerosol of latex is mainly produced by the active use of powdered gloves, but rugs or carpets and coverings act as important reservoirs of the allergen. Besides, the movement of people from areas with a high environmental concentration of latex constitutes an important means of dispersing the allergen, and probably ventilation systems as well. As in other cases of occupational asthma, diagnosis in many cases requires that a bronchial challenge be realized. The specific challenge tests through inhalation with latex have been carried out by different methods, which can be grouped by those that use an aqueous extract of latex and those that consist in handling or shaking gloves, which thus generate a dust aerosol. Each method has its advantages and drawbacks as described. Once the sensitized patient begins manifestations of the disease, his prognosis is poor if measures aimed at a maximum reduction of exposure to latex are not applied.

[Immunotherapy with grouped doses]

Once the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with allergen extracts has been shown, recently it has become evident the need for perfecting those aspects of the treatment that can be improved, such as its dosage form. The conventional dosage of subcutaneous immunotherapy in the phase of dose increase is slow in reaching an efficient level. For this reason other alternative dosages to the conventional one have been tried out, such as grouped dosages, which shorten this period of dose increase. On condition that the safety of the treatment is guaranteed, these doses offer the advantages of reducing the economic cost and the time involved, of reducing the discomfort of the treatment and of improving the patient's adherence to the treatment, and possibly of reaching clinical efficacy more rapidly. Nonetheless, it is not easy to determine the suitable dosage of administration (the shortest and with the least number of adverse reactions) and this article reviews the existing problems when it comes to designing these grouped doses. Finally, we present the results of a comparative study between the conventional dose and a grouped dose, with a double blind design, carried out by us, which shows that the grouped dose is quicker in achieving the desired clinical efficacy, shortens the times of reduction of cutaneous sensitivity to the allergen and of modification of the immunological parameters, all with a low frequency of adverse reactions that is similar to that registered with the conventional dosage.

Occupational asthma from natural rubber latex. Specific inhalation challenge test and evolution

BACKGROUND

Natural rubber latex (NRL) is the most frequent cause of occupational respiratory problems in hospital workers.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the diagnostic methodology, including the specific inhalation challenge (SIC), used on patients diagnosed as having occupational asthma due to NRL in our Allergy Department during a 6-year period from 1989 to 1995.

METHODS

In 19 patients diagnosed as having occupational asthma due to NRL, clinical severity was assessed with a combined score for symptoms and medication use. Skin prick tests with aeroallergens, latex, papain, kiwi and chestnut, total IgE, serum-specific latex IgE, respiratory function study, methacholine test, specific conjunctival test, and SIC test with latex were done.

RESULTS

All but three patients worked in hospitals. All presented urticaria and rhinoconjunctivitis, and six also suffered anaphylaxis, usually preceded by asthma. Clinical fruit allergy was present in eight patients. The latency period was variable (0.25-27 years). The intensity of symptoms was low to moderate. Specific IgE, skin prick, and conjunctival tests to latex were positive in all cases. SICs were done in 12 patients. All of them presented isolated immediate reactions. No adverse reactions were observed. Duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 7 years. Twenty-six percent of the patients kept their job, 26% changed jobs but remained in health care, and 48% switched to jobs unrelated to health care. Only 16% were free of symptoms without treatment, while 32% needed bronchodilators and 52% needed inhaled steroids. The specific bronchial challenge test was safe, but it did not predict the course of the illness. Duration of exposure and intensity of symptoms did correlate with prognosis, however.

CONCLUSIONS

NRL acts as a common aerollergen. Minor symptoms often precede occupational asthma. The SIC test was safe in the hands of trained technicians. Occupational asthma due to NRL seems to have a poor prognosis.

[Allergy to Anisakis simplex]

Anisakis simplex is a parasite, belonging to the Anisakidae family. The life cycle of the parasite can include one or more intermediary hosts, their final hosts being marine mammals or large fish, in which the larvae develop until the adult stage is reached. Man is an accidental host who acquires the larvae by eating raw or undercooked fish. Since the mid-50s, when the first case studies were published in Holland and Japan, new cases have been emerging in different countries including Spain. Parasitization of man by the living larva is known as anisakiasis, principally giving rise to digestive symptomology, with other rare cases described of invasion of other organs such as the lung, the liver, the spleen, the pancreas, etc. Clinical pictures of allergy to IgE mediated anisakis simplex have also been described: reactions by thermostable antigens of the parasite that develop in spite of the fish being cooked or frozen, and an acute digestive parasitization with allergic symptoms called gastro-allergic anisakiasis. In the diagnosis of anisakiasis and/or allergy to Anisakis, the antecedent of the prior ingestion of fish as well as the clinical accompaniment can form basic data of considerable orientational value, and endoscopy can reveal the presence of the larvae and make possible their extraction. Besides, in cases of allergy the detection test for specific IgE facing Anisakis simplex, and cutaneous tests with fish should be carried out. The best treatment for avoiding this parasitization is prophylactic, avoiding the consumption of raw or undercooked fish, while a fish free diet is necessary in cases of true allergy to the thermostable proteins of the parasite.

Liposome-entrapped D. pteronyssinus vaccination in mild asthma patients: effect of 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and immediate and late bronchial responses to the allergen

BACKGROUND

Allergen vaccination is effective in mite-allergic asthma. Liposomes are immunological adjuvants that can act as allergen carriers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the immunological and functional effects of a liposome-entrapped D. pteronyssinus vaccine on mite monosensitive, mild asthma patients.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 26 asthma patients who randomly received vaccination or placebo for 1 year. The levels of exposure to Der p 1 allergen were constant during the study. Allergen bronchial challenge was made at the beginning (T0) and after 1 year of treatment (T12). The day before and 24 h after the allergen provocation, patients were challenged with methacholine (Mth) (until FEV1 fell by 40%) and blood and sputum samples were obtained. Dose-response curves to Mth were evaluated in terms of Mth-PD20 (dose of Mth that induced 20% drop in FEV1), slope (Mth-DRS) and level of plateau. Blood and sputum eosinophils and serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were measured.

RESULTS

Groups were comparable at the start of the trial. At TI2, previous to the allergen challenge, the active group showed higher values of both FEV1 and Mth-PD20 and lower values of Mth-DRS. The number of patients presenting a level of plateau increased in the active group (from two to four) and decreased in the placebo group (from two to one). At T12, before the allergen challenge, serum ECP levels increased in the placebo group and blood eosinophils showed a trend towards lower numbers in the active one. The immediate response and the changes in Mth-DRS values, sputum eosinophils and serum ECP levels following the allergen challenge were attenuated in the active group.

CONCLUSION

Liposome-entrapped D. Pteronyssinus vaccination: (i) protects mild asthma patients from the worsening of asthma due to sustained mite exposure; and (ii) reduces the functional and inflammatory changes induced by allergen bronchial provocation.

[Treatment perspectives: immunotherapy with latex]

Latex allergy currently constitutes a serious problem because of the severity of its symptoms and the at-risk groups it affects. Since complete avoidance of this substance is practically impossible, in the last few years intense efforts have been made to standardize a latex extract with the aim not only of improving clinical diagnosis but also of being able to offer other therapeutic alternatives, such as specific immunotherapy.Since 1998, reports of immunotherapy with oral (three patients) subcutaneous (one patient) and sublingual latex desensitization (one patient) have been published. In all cases, clinical improvement was evident. In 2000, Laynadier published the first pilot study, a phase IIB multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with latex in patients with occupational allergy. Twenty health care workers without obvious latex exposure and with latex allergy-induced symptoms of rhinitis and/or asthma were included. Treatment started with a 2-day course of rush immunotherapy in hospital and maintenance therapy was continued for 1 year. Efficacy was assessed by symptom and medication scores and by variation in the conjunctival reactivity threshold. The safety of the extract was also evaluated. In the overall analysis of symptom score, the treated group showed a marked improvement and the medication score was significantly lower in patients in the active treatment group than in the placebo group. Concerning safety, almost half the patients receiving active treatment showed local reactions starting with the first injection and four of the nine patients in this group suffered moderate-to-severe systemic reactions. In view of this first clinical trial, it can be concluded that this treatment is effective but that its tolerance is low.A second clinical trial with the same characteristics and extract is currently underway. Its aim is to validate the previous protocol, confirm the efficacy of specific immunotherapy with latex, improve its safety and, if possible, determine the optimal dose.J. Sastre et al. have recently (Formigal 2002) presented the results of the first double-blind study with latex immunotherapy using an extract standardized by the ALK-Abelló-España group. The authors included 24 patients with latex sensitization and symptoms of occupational allergy. To diagnose respiratory allergy, an inhalation challenge was performed in a closed 7-m2 chamber and, in case of contact urticaria, glove-wearing and rubbing tests were performed, using a vinyl glove as negative control. Treatment consisted of a first phase of incremental doses for 14 weeks, with 18 injections, followed by maintenance doses for 6 months. Sixteen patients received active treatment and 8 received placebo. Of the 578 doses administered, adverse effects were observed in 41 (7.1 %). There were 21 immediate systemic reactions (5.7 % of the doses) and 10 delayed systemic reactions (2.6 % of the doses). Adverse effects were more frequent in patients with underlying respiratory disease (p < 0.05). After 6 months' treatment, a clear improvement in the cutaneous response index was found in the active treatment group and in the rubbing and glove-wearing tests. The authors conclude that the immunotherapy tested was a high-risk treatment and that the greatest clinical improvement was found in cutaneous symptoms.In conclusion, although effective, latex immunotherapy is currently a high-risk treatment.

Tolerance of immunotherapy with a standardized extract of Alternaria tenuis in patients with rhinitis and bronchial asthma

We studied the safety of immunotherapy with an Alternaria extract in patients with rhinitis and bronchial asthma. The few studies that have investigated immunotherapy with mold allergens suggest that they cause adverse reactions more frequently than do other extracts. All treatments prescribed by our allergology service with Alternaria immunotherapy between 1988 and 1996 were recorded and analyzed. In all cases a biologically standardized depot extract of Alternaria tenuis containing 5 BU/ml was used according to a conventional immunotherapy schedule. During the study period 129 patients received immunotherapy with Alternaria extract. Of the 3,892 doses given, 1.95% led to adverse reactions, which occurred in 39.5% of the patients. Most of the adverse reactions were systemic and mild, and reproduced the underlying disease. The risk of adverse reactions was significantly higher in children, patients with asthma, and during the initial phase of treatment. Patients who suffered from adverse reactions had a significantly higher level of total and specific IgE. It was concluded that tolerance of Alternaria mold extract was worse than for other allergenic extracts, although most reactions recorded were mild. The risk of adverse reactions was greater in children and patients with asthma, and during the initial phase of immunotherapy.

Comparison of allergen-induced changes in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation between mildly allergic asthma patients and allergic rhinitis patients

Bronchial eosinophilic inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) are the main features of allergic asthma (AA), but they have also been demonstrated in allergic rhinitis (AR), suggesting a continuity between both diseases. In spite of not fully reproducing natural allergenic exposure, the allergen bronchial provocation test (A-BPT) has provided important knowledge of the pathophysiology of AA. Our aim was to verify the existence of a behavior of AA and AR airways different from the allergen bronchial challenge-induced airway eosinophilic inflammation and BHR changes. We studied a group of 31 mild and short-evolution AA and 15 AR patients, sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. The A-BPT was performed with a partially biologically standardized D. pteronyssinus extract, and known quantities of Der p 1 were inhaled. Peripheral blood (eosinophils and ECP) and induced sputum (percentage cell counts, ECP, albumin, tryptase, and interleukin [IL]-5) were analyzed, before and 24 h after A-BPT. Methacholine BHR, assessed before and 32 h after the A-BPT, was defined by M-PD20 values and, when possible, by maximal response plateau (MRP). The A-BPT was well tolerated by all the patients. AA presented a lower Der p 1 PD20 and a higher occurrence of late-phase responses (LPR). M-PD20 values decreased in AA, but not in AR, patients. MRP values increased in both groups. Eosinophils numbers and ECP levels increased in blood and sputum from both AA and AR, but only the absolute increment of sputum ECP levels was higher in AA than AR patients (P = 0.025). The A-BPT induced no change in sputum albumin, tryptase, or IL-5 values. We conclude as follows: 1) In spite of presenting a lower degree of bronchial sensitivity to allergen, AR patients responded to allergen inhalation with an eosinophilic inflammation enhancement very similar to that observed among AA. 2) MRP levels increased in both AA and AR patients after allergen challenge; however, M-PD20 values significantly changed only in the AA group, suggesting that the components of the airway response to methacholine were controlled by different mechanisms. 3) It is possible that the differences between AR and AA lie only in the quantitative bronchial response to allergen inhalation.

Identification of allergens involved in occupational asthma due to carmine dye

BACKGROUND

Carmine has been implicated as an etiologic agent of occupational asthma, but the allergens involved have not been yet identified.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the allergens involved in occupational asthma due to carmine dye.

METHODS

An in vitro study based in SDS-PAGE and IgE immunoblotting with carmine and cochineal extracts was performed. Sera from three carmine dye workers diagnosed with occupational asthma induced by carmine dye and from seven nonatopic subjects were used.

RESULTS

Three proteins of around 30, 28, and 17 kD in raw cochineal extract and another protein of 50 kD in the boiled one were demonstrated by SDS-PAGE. Two proteins of around 50 and 28 kD were observed in the carmine extract by the same technique. Specific IgE binding bands at 17 kD in cochineal raw extract, at 50 kD in the boiled one, and at 28 kD in carmine extract were demonstrated by IgE immunoblotting.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified three allergens of around 17, 28, and 50 kD implicated in occupational asthma of three carmine workers.

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated.

METHODS

We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant.

RESULTS

Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.

Effect of current exposure to Der p 1 on asthma symptoms, airway inflammation, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mite-allergic asthmatics

The existence of a dose-response relationship between indoor allergen exposure and sensitization has been widely described, but the effect of allergen exposure on asthma activity (symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness [BHR], and inflammation) is not clear. Our aim was to determine the existence of an association among current exposure to mite allergens and symptoms, BHR, and airway inflammation assessed in blood and sputum from asthmatic patients sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. We selected 31 mild and recently diagnosed (12-24 months) asthma patients sensitized to D. pteronyssinus. Allergenic exposure (Der p 1, Der 2) was assessed by a commercial assay based on monoclonal antibodies (mAb), carried out on the dust samples collected from patients' beds in a standardized way. Patients completed an asthma symptom questionnaire and underwent skin tests, methacholine bronchial challenge, and sputum induction. Sputum cell profile was analyzed and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin(IL)-5 levels were quantified in sputum supernatant. Total eosinophil numbers and ECP levels were measured in blood samples. Most patients were exposed to Der p 1 levels under 2 microg/g of dust. Der p 1 exposure was higher among the subjects with positive sputum tryptase detection (P = 0.020). Der p 1 levels showed a trend toward correlation with asthma symptoms (P = 0.066, r = 0.36) and correlated with sputum tryptase levels (P = 0.032, r = 0.42). No relationship between BHR, eosinophilic inflammation, and allergenic exposure was found. Our results suggest that asthma symptoms and lung mast-cell activation are at least partially dependent on current allergen exposure. The lack of correlation between mite exposure, eosinophilic inflammation, and BHR supports the role of other factors that enhance the immunologic response initiated by allergen, increasing the activity of asthma.