ReIMAGINE: a prostate cancer research consortium with added value through its patient and public involvement and engagement

BACKGROUND

ReIMAGINE aims to improve the current prostate specific antigen (PSA)/biopsy risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) and develop a new image-based method (with biomarkers) for diagnosing high/low risk PCa in men. ReIMAGINE's varied patient and public involvement (PPI) and engagement (PE) strategy maximises the impact of its scientific output by informing and shaping the different stages of research.

AIMS

Through including the voice of patients and the public, the ReIMAGINE Consortium aims to translate these different perspectives into the design and implementation process. This will improve the overall quality of the research by: reflecting the needs and priorities of patients and the public, ensuring methods and procedures are feasible and appropriate ensuring information is relevant and accessible to those being recruited to the study identifying dissemination channels relevant to patients/the public and developing outputs that are accessible to a lay audience With support from our patient/user groups, the ReIMAGINE Consortium aims to improve our ability to derive prognostic information and allocate men to the most appropriate and effective therapies, using a novel image-based risk stratification with investigation of non-imaging biomarkers.

FINDINGS

We have been working with patients and the public from initiation of the project to ensure that the research is relevant to men and their families. Our PPI Sub-Committee, led by a PCa patient, has been involved in our dissemination strategy, outreach activities, and study design recommendations. For example, the sub-committee have developed a variety of informative videos relevant and accessible to those being recruited, and organised multiple online research engagement events that are accessible to a lay audience. As quoted by one of the study participants, "the more we present the benefits and opportunities to patients and the public, the more research commitment we obtain, and the sooner critical clinical questions such as PCa diagnostics will be addressed".

1426 Assessing the Impact Of COVID-19 On ENT Referrals at A West London General Practice

Aim

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in initial GP consultations being conducted via telephone. This quality improvement initiative quantified this impact on ENT referrals conducted at a West London GP, using education to improve awareness of the relevant NICE guidance to reduce inappropriate referrals.

Method

An initial retrospective audit comparing number and urgency of ENT referrals and the appropriateness of ENT referrals (using NICE guidance) during the face to face (F2F) period (August 2019 – February 2020) and telephone period (March – September 2020) was performed. Results were presented locally to GPs, with education measures on relevant NICE guidance implemented. Further PDSA cycles occurred during October and November 2020.

Results

In total, 16 ENT referrals were made during the F2F period (routine n = 15; urgent n = 1); 3 were inappropriate. 31 referrals were made between March and September 2020 (routine n = 27, urgent n = 2, 2WW n = 2); 4 were inappropriate. Further cycles in October 2020, and November 2020 identified 13 referrals (routine n = 10, 2WW n = 3), and 2 referrals (routine n = 2) respectively. 1 inappropriate referral was made during October and none in November.

Conclusions

Locally, it appears that the number of routine referrals has increased since the advent of the initial lockdown. This may be partially explained by the practice losing the ability to perform some ENT services, such as ear wax micro-suctioning. Education to increase awareness of relevant guidance has been shown to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals to ENT services.

An evaluation of MR based deep learning auto-contouring for planning head and neck radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Auto contouring models help consistently define volumes and reduce clinical workload. This study aimed to evaluate the cross acquisition of a Magnetic Resonance (MR) deep learning auto contouring model for organ at risk (OAR) delineation in head and neck radiotherapy.

METHODS

Two auto contouring models were evaluated using deep learning contouring expert (DLCExpert) for OAR delineation: a CT model (modelCT) and an MR model (modelMRI). Models were trained to generate auto contours for the bilateral parotid glands and submandibular glands. Auto-contours for modelMRI were trained on diagnostic images and tested on 10 diagnostic, 10 MR radiotherapy planning (RTP), eight MR-Linac (MRL) scans and, by modelCT, on 10 CT planning scans. Goodness of fit scores, dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA) were calculated for comparison.

RESULTS

ModelMRI contours improved the mean DSC and DTA compared with manual contours for the bilateral parotid glands and submandibular glands on the diagnostic and RTP MRs compared with the MRL sequence. There were statistically significant differences seen for modelMRI compared to modelCT for the left parotid (mean DTA 2.3 v 2.8 mm), right parotid (mean DTA 1.9 v 2.7 mm), left submandibular gland (mean DTA 2.2 v 2.4 mm) and right submandibular gland (mean DTA 1.6 v 3.2 mm).

CONCLUSION

A deep learning MR auto-contouring model shows promise for OAR auto-contouring with statistically improved performance vs a CT based model. Performance is affected by the method of MR acquisition and further work is needed to improve its use with MRL images.

The prevalence and severity of lower back pain in South African university rowers

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is a condition prevalent among rowers due to the repetitive and physically demanding nature of rowing. Information concerning LBP among university-level rowers is, however, outdated and not widely available.

Objective

To determine the prevalence, severity and disabilities of LBP among university-level rowers in South Africa.

Methods

An online questionnaire, including the Athlete Disability Index (ADI) Questionnaire, was distributed to nine South African university rowing clubs. One-hundred participants aged between 18 to 30 years completed the online questionnaires.

Results

Eighty-seven rowers admitted to sustaining LBP either at the time of the study or previously in their university rowing career. These rowers (n=87) completed the Athlete Disability Index (ADI) Questionnaire which provided a moderate LBP disability score (ADI score: 8.1±6.0; ADI %: 24.7%±18.1). Rowers who had been rowing for a longer duration reported a higher severity of LBP (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for LBP prevalence (p=0.584), or severity (p=0.445) between the sexes. A small significant correlation between age and the ADI score (r=0.25, p= 0.021) was reported. The high prevalence and moderate severity highlight the significance of LBP among university rowers.

Conclusion

This study illustrates the prevalence of LBP with moderate severity among university rowers. Future research on LBP risk factors and aetiology is recommended to decrease the negative impact of this condition.

The physical attributes of sub-elite rugby union referees of inland provinces in South Africa

Background

The purpose of the on-field referee is to implement the laws of the game. For the referee to do this successfully, he is required to keep up with the pace of play.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the physical attributes of sub-elite rugby union referees of inland provinces in South Africa.

Methods

A total of 82 referees (age: 26.5 ± 6.4 years; stature: 177.3 ± 6.8 cm; body mass: 79.1 ± 14.7 kg) were assessed with a reliable testing battery.

Results

The participants showed a refined aerobic capacity (VO_2max: 61.8 ± 11.0 mL·min^-1·kg^-1) and good agility (Illinois Agility Test: 17.2 ± 3.8 s). A two-way unbalanced ANOVA was performed for all referees' attributes between qualification levels (levels 1-4) and union affiliations (three unions) at a significance level of p<0.05. The results yielded significant differences across the three unions in age (p=0.002), Yo-Yo distance (p=0.0001), aerobic capacity (p=0.0001), plank time (p=0.0001) and agility (p=0.027). Similarly, differences were reported across the four qualifications in aerobic capacity (p=0.0001) and agility (p=0.037).

Conclusion

These differences may be due to the diverse training programmes offered by the various unions. Additionally, an increased level of physical fitness may occur when progressing up the qualification levels.

Emergency preparedness, resilience and response to a biological outbreak

Major disease outbreaks continue to be a significant risk to public health, with pandemic influenza or an emerging infectious disease outbreak at the top of the UK National Risk Register. The risk of deliberate release of a biological agent is lower but remains possible and may only be recognised after casualties seek medical attention. In this context the emergency preparedness, resilience and response (EPRR) process protects the public from high consequence infectious diseases, other infectious disease outbreaks and biological agent release. The core elements of the EPRR response are recognition of an outbreak, isolation of patients, appropriate personal protective equipment for medical staff and actions to minimise further disease spread. The paper discusses how high-threat agents may be recognised by clinicians, the initial actions to be taken on presentation and how the public health system is notified and responds. It draws on the national pandemic influenza plans to describe the wider response to a major disease outbreak and discusses training requirements and the potential role of the military.

Patients as teachers: Evaluating the experiences of volunteer inpatients during medical student clinical skills training

PURPOSE

Early patient encounters in medical education are an important element of clinical skill development. This study explores the experiences of volunteer inpatients (VIPs) participating in clinical skills training with junior medical students (JMS) solely for educational purposes.

METHODS

Following first-year medical students practicing history taking and clinical examinations with VIPs at Toronto General Hospital (TGH) and Toronto Western Hospital (TWH), patients completed a questionnaire and a short audio-recorded interview. This study used a mixed methodological approach. A 5-point Likert-scaled survey queried satisfaction regarding the recruitment process, student and faculty interactions and patient demographics (e.g. age and educational background). A 10-minute follow-up interview investigated patient perspectives. Survey responses were correlated to patient demographics and descriptive thematic analysis summarized trends in patient perspectives.

RESULTS

Of 93 consenting VIPs, 66% were male and 58% participated at TGH. The mean overall experience was positive (4.76 and 4.93 at TGH and TWH, respectively). Three themes emerging through thematic analysis were Not "Just" a Medical Student, Patient as Teacher, and Promoting Best Practices. VIPs reported positive experiences when they were adequately informed of the VIP role during recruitment, and when students exhibited confidence, interest, and respect throughout the session.

CONCLUSION

Study results provide clarity about VIP experiences with JMS and lay a foundation for improved patient satisfaction and best practices within clinical skills curricula in the health professions.

SAT0399 RISK OF OSTEOARTHRITIS IN AN INCIDENT COHORT OF PEOPLE WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

Background:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that causes pain, stiffness and swelling around the joints. PsA is reported to affect between 10 and 40% of individuals with psoriasis1and in the majority of patients presents after, or synchronously with, psoriasis onset.2Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common form of non-inflammatory arthritis related to joint degeneration and typically commences late in the fifth decade. PsA and OA have long been considered two distinct arthropathies, however they do have some overlapping features and symptoms and in certain circumstances it can be difficult to differentiate between them, particularly in the small joints of the hands or spine.3

Objectives:

To determine the risk of a diagnosis of osteoarthritis in psoriatic arthritis patients compared to patients with psoriasis and a general population cohort.

Methods:

Incident PsA patients aged 18-89 years at diagnosis were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2014. All PsA patients were matched to a cohort of patients with psoriasis and a general population cohort (with no psoriasis or PsA) at a 1:4 ratio based on index date, year of birth, sex and general practice. The baseline prevalence of OA of any site was calculated as a percentage for each study cohort and then those prevalent cases were excluded from the numerators and denominators of the incident calculations. The incidence of OA was calculated and relative risks (RRadj), adjusting for body mass index (BMI), were calculated using conditional Poisson regression.

Results:

In total, 6,783 incident PsA patients were identified. The baseline prevalence of OA ranged from 22.1% (CI9521.1-23.1) in the PsA cohort to 12.6% (CI9512.2-13.0) and 11.0% (CI9510.6-11.3) in the psoriasis and general population cohorts respectively. The incidence of OA was significantly higher in the PsA cohort compared to the psoriasis and general population cohorts after adjusting for BMI (RRadj1.68 CI951.46-1.93 and RRadj1.86 CI951.62-2.14 respectively) (Tables 1 and 2).

Conclusion:

An increased risk of OA was observed in patients with PsA compared to patients with psoriasis alone and those in the general population. Further work is needed to determine whether this reflects a true increase in OA risk or misdiagnosed PsA and the extent to which it can be explained by differences in the opportunity for OA diagnosis between cohorts.

Table 1.

Incidence of osteoarthritis in the PsA, psoriasis and general population cohorts

CasesMedian age (years) at diagnosis (IQR)Person yearsIncidence rate per10,000 person yearsCI95Any OAϮGeneral population137459 (51 - 66)125,798109.2(103.5 - 115.0)Psoriasis143259 (53 - 67)122,279117.1(111.0 - 123.2)PsA46459 (51 - 66)28,574162.4(147.6 - 177.2)

Ϯincluding spondylosis

References:

[1]Ogdie A, Weiss P. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015;41(4):545-568.

[2]Tillett Wet al.Rheumatol. 2017;56(12):2109-2113.

[3]McGonagle Det al. Rheumatology. 2015;54(1):29-38.

Table 2.

Risk of osteoarthritis in patients with PsA compared with patients in the general population and patients with psoriasis

PsA compared with a general population cohortPsA compared with a psoriasis cohortUnadjustedAdjusted†UnadjustedAdjusted†RRCI95PRRCI95PRRCI95PRRCI95POA1.871.67-2.10<0.00011.861.62-2.14<0.00011.681.50-1.88<0.00011.681.46-1.93<0.0001

†adjusted for BMI taken as the closest entry within 3 years of the index date

Acknowledgments:

This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Programme Grants for Applied Research [Early detection to improve outcome in patients with undiagnosed PsA (‘PROMPT’), RP-PG-1212-20007]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

0167 The Effect of Nocturnal Dinner Type “Light” Versus “Heavy” on Sleep, Attention and Microbial Composition

Introduction

Nutrition and sleep are two essential functions for the physiological existence of the organism. Furthermore, both have an acquired cultural, educational and social behavioral component. This study examined the effect of nocturnal dinner type (“light” vs. “heavy”) on the quality and quantity of sleep, attention abilities, fatigue, and mood in the following morning. In addition, the microbial composition was examined.

Methods

Twenty healthy subjects (10 men and 10 women), aged 25–33, were invited to two non-consecutive nights at the Sleep Institute for polysomnography test and filling out questionnaires: KSS; ESS; and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), attention abilities assessed with CPT-III. In one evening, the subjects consumed two hours before bedtime a “light” dinner based on vegetable ingredients (vegetables and vegetable proteins) with 342 calories that contained lentils, feta cheese, beet, and other vegetables. On the other evening, the subjects consumed two hours before bedtime a “heavy” dinner based on carbohydrates, fats, and animal protein with 501 calories that contained hamburger and French fries. In addition, subjects were required to give a microbial test before and after meals.

Results

There was no significant difference in the various sleep parameters between the two nights after each meal type: efficacy (t=-1.51,p=0.15); sleep latency stage 1 (t=1.81,p=0.08); sleep latency stage 2 (t=1.00,p=0.33); REM latency (t=0.57,p=0.57); total sleep time (t=-1.57,p=0.13); number of awakenings (t=0.30, p=0.76). No significant differences were found for: fatigue (KSS) (t=-0.30,p =0.77); sleepiness (ESS) (t=0.76,p =0.45); mood (BSI) (t=0.87,p =0.39); and attention deficit (CPT-III) (t=-0.68,p =0.50). The type of night meal did not show a significant effect on the microbial composition (H=0.059,p= 0.81).

Conclusion

The findings of this study show that, contrary to popular belief, “heavy” dinner did not affect the quality of sleep and functions measured in the study compared to a “light” dinner. In the current research, the population that was examined included only young and healthy subjects, therefore, the results may differ if the research in this field will extend and include other populations such as adults and subjects with different disorders. Future studies are needed to examine the relationships between sleep and nutrtion.

Support

No support