26
|
Zhou N, Xu L, Pfingst BE. Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2012; 284:25-32. [PMID: 22245714 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2011] [Revised: 12/20/2011] [Accepted: 12/28/2011] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The ability of an implanted ear to integrate multiple pulses, as measured by the slopes of detection threshold level (T level) versus pulse rate functions, may reflect cochlear health in the cochlea, as suggested by previous animal studies (Kang et al., 2010; Pfingst et al., 2011). In the current study, we examined the slopes of T level versus pulse rate functions in human subjects with cochlear implants. Typically, T levels decrease as a function of pulse rate, consistent with a multipulse integration mechanism. The magnitudes of the slopes of the T level versus pulse rate functions obtained from the human subjects were comparable to those reported in the animal studies. The slopes varied across stimulation sites, but did not change systematically along the tonotopic axis. This suggests that the slopes are dependent on local conditions near the individual stimulation sites. The characteristics of these functions were also similar to those found in animals in that the slopes for higher pulse rates were steeper than those for the lower pulse rates, consistent with a combined effect of multipulse integration and cumulative partial depolarization mechanisms at rates above 1000 pps. The maximum comfortable loudness level (C level) versus pulse rate functions were also examined to determine the effect of level on the slopes. Slopes of C-level functions were shallower than those for the T-level functions and were not correlated with those of the T-level functions, so the mechanisms underlying these two functions are probably not identical. The slopes of the T- or C-level functions were not dependent on stimulus-current level. Based on these results, we suggest that slopes of T level versus pulse rate functions might be a useful measure for estimating nerve survival in the cochlea in regions close to the stimulation sites.
Collapse
|
27
|
Chikar JA, Hendricks JL, Richardson-Burns SM, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE, Martin DC. The use of a dual PEDOT and RGD-functionalized alginate hydrogel coating to provide sustained drug delivery and improved cochlear implant function. Biomaterials 2011; 33:1982-90. [PMID: 22182748 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2011] [Accepted: 11/20/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants provide hearing by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. Implant function can be hindered by device design variables, including electrode size and electrode-to-nerve distance, and cochlear environment variables, including the degeneration of the auditory nerve following hair cell loss. We have developed a dual-component cochlear implant coating to improve both the electrical function of the implant and the biological stability of the inner ear, thereby facilitating the long-term perception of sound through a cochlear implant. This coating is a combination of an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-functionalized alginate hydrogel and the conducting polymer poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT). Both in vitro and in vivo assays on the effects of these electrode coatings demonstrated improvements in device performance. We found that the coating reduced electrode impedance, improved charge delivery, and locally released significant levels of a trophic factor into cochlear fluids. This coating is non-cytotoxic, clinically relevant, and has the potential to significantly improve the cochlear implant user's experience.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pfingst BE, Colesa DJ, Hembrador S, Kang SY, Middlebrooks JC, Raphael Y, Su GL. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011; 130:3954-68. [PMID: 22225050 PMCID: PMC3253597 DOI: 10.1121/1.3651820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2011] [Revised: 09/13/2011] [Accepted: 09/14/2011] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Perception of electrical stimuli varies widely across users of cochlear implants and across stimulation sites in individual users. It is commonly assumed that the ability of subjects to detect and discriminate electrical signals is dependent, in part, on conditions in the implanted cochlea, but evidence supporting that hypothesis is sparse. The objective of this study was to define specific relationships between the survival of tissues near the implanted electrodes and the functional responses to electrical stimulation of those electrodes. Psychophysical and neurophysiological procedures were used to assess stimulus detection as a function of pulse rate under the various degrees of cochlear pathology. Cochlear morphology, assessed post-mortem, ranged from near-normal numbers of hair cells, peripheral processes and spiral ganglion cells, to complete absence of hair cells and peripheral processes and small numbers of surviving spiral ganglion cells. The psychophysical and neurophysiological studies indicated that slopes and levels of the threshold versus pulse rate functions reflected multipulse integration throughout the 200 ms pulse train with an additional contribution of interactions between adjacent pulses at high pulse rates. The amount of multipulse integration was correlated with the health of the implanted cochlea with implications for perception of more complex prosthetic stimuli.
Collapse
|
29
|
Shibata SB, Budenz CL, Bowling SA, Pfingst BE, Raphael Y. Nerve maintenance and regeneration in the damaged cochlea. Hear Res 2011; 281:56-64. [PMID: 21596129 PMCID: PMC3196294 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2011] [Revised: 04/22/2011] [Accepted: 04/23/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Following the onset of sensorineural hearing loss, degeneration of mechanosensitive hair cells and spiral ganglion cells (SGCs) in humans and animals occurs to variable degrees, with a trend for greater neural degeneration with greater duration of deafness. Emergence of the cochlear implant prosthesis has provided much needed aid to many hearing impaired patients and has become a well-recognized therapy worldwide. However, ongoing peripheral nerve fiber regression and subsequent degeneration of SGC bodies can reduce the neural targets of cochlear implant stimulation and diminish its function. There is increasing interest in bio-engineering approaches that aim to enhance cochlear implant efficacy by preventing SGC body degeneration and/or regenerating peripheral nerve fibers into the deaf sensory epithelium. We review the advancements in maintaining and regenerating nerves in damaged animal cochleae, with an emphasis on the therapeutic capacity of neurotrophic factors delivered to the inner ear after an insult. Additionally, we summarize the histological process of neuronal degeneration in the inner ear and describe different animal models that have been employed to study this mechanism. Research on enhancing the biological infrastructure of the deafened cochlea in order to improve cochlear implant efficacy is of immediate clinical importance.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pfingst BE, Bowling SA, Colesa DJ, Garadat SN, Raphael Y, Shibata SB, Strahl SB, Su GL, Zhou N. Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing. Hear Res 2011; 281:65-73. [PMID: 21605648 PMCID: PMC3208788 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2011] [Revised: 04/29/2011] [Accepted: 05/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Although the cochlear implant is already the world's most successful neural prosthesis, opportunities for further improvement abound. Promising areas of current research include work on improving the biological infrastructure in the implanted cochlea to optimize reception of cochlear implant stimulation and on designing the pattern of electrical stimulation to take maximal advantage of conditions in the implanted cochlea. In this review we summarize what is currently known about conditions in the cochlea of deaf, implanted humans and then review recent work from our animal laboratory investigating the effects of preserving or reinnervating tissues on psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of implant function. Additionally we review work from our human laboratory on optimizing the pattern of electrical stimulation to better utilize strengths in the cochlear infrastructure. Histological studies of human temporal bones from implant users and from people who would have been candidates for implants show a range of pathologic conditions including spiral ganglion cell counts ranging from approximately 2% to 92% of normal and partial hair cell survival in some cases. To duplicate these conditions in a guinea pig model, we use a variety of deafening and implantation procedures as well as post-deafening therapies designed to protect neurons and/or regenerate neurites. Across populations of human patients, relationships between nerve survival and functional measures such as speech have been difficult to demonstrate, possibly due to the numerous subject variables that can affect implant function and the elapsed time between functional measures and postmortem histology. However, psychophysical studies across stimulation sites within individual human subjects suggest that biological conditions near the implanted electrodes contribute significantly to implant function, and this is supported by studies in animal models comparing histological findings to psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Results of these studies support the efforts to improve the biological infrastructure in the implanted ear and guide strategies which optimize stimulation patterns to match patient-specific conditions in the cochlea.
Collapse
|
31
|
Pfingst BE. Effects of electrode configuration on cochlear implant modulation detection thresholds. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011; 129:3908-3915. [PMID: 21682413 PMCID: PMC3135147 DOI: 10.1121/1.3583543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2010] [Revised: 03/18/2011] [Accepted: 04/02/2011] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implant function, as assessed by psychophysical measures, varies from one stimulation site to another within a patient's cochlea. This suggests that patient performance might be improved by selection of the best-functioning sites for the processor map. In evaluating stimulation sites for such a strategy, electrode configuration is an important variable. Variation across stimulation sites in loudness-related measures (detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels), is much larger for stimulation with bipolar electrode configurations than with monopolar configurations. The current study found that, in contrast to the loudness-related measures, magnitudes of across-site means and the across-site variances of modulation detection thresholds were not dependent on electrode configuration, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying variation in these various psychophysical measures are not all the same. The data presented here suggest that bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations are equally effective in identifying good and poor stimulation sites for modulation detection but that the across-site patterns of modulation detection thresholds are not the same for the two configurations. Therefore, it is recommended to test all stimulation sites using the patient's clinically assigned electrode configuration when performing psychophysical evaluation of a patient's modulation detection acuity to select sites for the processor map.
Collapse
|
32
|
Shibata SB, Cortez SR, Beyer LA, Wiler JA, Di Polo A, Pfingst BE, Raphael Y. Transgenic BDNF induces nerve fiber regrowth into the auditory epithelium in deaf cochleae. Exp Neurol 2010; 223:464-72. [PMID: 20109446 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2009] [Revised: 01/20/2010] [Accepted: 01/21/2010] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Sensory organs typically use receptor cells and afferent neurons to transduce environmental signals and transmit them to the CNS. When sensory cells are lost, nerves often regress from the sensory area. Therapeutic and regenerative approaches would benefit from the presence of nerve fibers in the tissue. In the hearing system, retraction of afferent innervation may accompany the degeneration of auditory hair cells that is associated with permanent hearing loss. The only therapy currently available for cases with severe or complete loss of hair cells is the cochlear implant auditory prosthesis. To enhance the therapeutic benefits of a cochlear implant, it is necessary to attract nerve fibers back into the cochlear epithelium. Here we show that forced expression of the neurotrophin gene BDNF in epithelial or mesothelial cells that remain in the deaf ear induces robust regrowth of nerve fibers towards the cells that secrete the neurotrophin, and results in re-innervation of the sensory area. The process of neurotrophin-induced neuronal regeneration is accompanied by significant preservation of the spiral ganglion cells. The ability to regrow nerve fibers into the basilar membrane area and protect the auditory nerve will enhance performance of cochlear implants and augment future cell replacement therapies such as stem cell implantation or induced transdifferentiation. This model also provides a general experimental stage for drawing nerve fibers into a tissue devoid of neurons, and studying the interaction between the nerve fibers and the tissue.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kang SY, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Su GL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2009; 11:245-65. [PMID: 19902297 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0194-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2008] [Accepted: 10/01/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear implant function to improve speech recognition in noise as well as perception of music. The current study had two primary objectives. First, we sought to determine how cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation over a time period of 14 to 21 months influence cochlear structures such as hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. Second, we sought to investigate whether the structures that provide acoustic hearing also affect the perception of electrical stimulation. We compared psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation in two groups of adult guinea pigs. Group I (11 animals) received a cochlear implant in a previously untreated ear, while group II (ten animals) received a cochlear implant in an ear that had been previously infused with neomycin to destroy hearing. Psychophysical thresholds were measured in response to pulse-train and sinusoidal stimuli. Histological analysis of all group I animals and a subset of group II animals was performed. Nine of the 11 group I animals showed survival of the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion neurons adjacent to the electrode array. All group I animals showed survival of these elements in regions apical to the electrode array. Group II animals that were examined histologically showed complete loss of the organ of Corti in regions adjacent and apical to the electrode array and severe spiral ganglion neuron loss, consistent with previous reports for neomycin-treated ears. Behaviorally, group II animals had significantly lower thresholds than group I animals in response to 100 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. However, group I animals had significantly lower thresholds than group II animals in response to pulse-train stimuli (0.02 ms/phase; 156 to 5,000 pps). Additionally, the two groups showed distinct threshold versus pulse rate functions. We hypothesize that the differences in detection thresholds between groups are caused by the electrical activation of the hair cells in group I animals and/or differences between groups in the condition of the spiral ganglion neurons.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chikar JA, Batts SA, Pfingst BE, Raphael Y. Visualization of spiral ganglion neurites within the scala tympani with a cochlear implant in situ. J Neurosci Methods 2009; 179:201-7. [PMID: 19428528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2008] [Revised: 01/15/2009] [Accepted: 01/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Current cochlear histology methods do not allow in situ processing of cochlear implants. The metal components of the implant preclude standard embedding and mid-modiolar sectioning, and whole mounts do not have the spatial resolution needed to view the implant within the scala tympani. One focus of recent auditory research is the regeneration of structures within the cochlea, particularly the ganglion cells and their processes, and there are multiple potential benefits to cochlear implant users from this work. To facilitate experimental investigations of auditory nerve regeneration performed in conjunction with cochlear implantation, it is critical to visualize the cochlear tissue and the implant together to determine if the nerve has made contact with the implant. This paper presents a novel histological technique that enables simultaneous visualization of the in situ cochlear implant and neurofilament-labeled nerve processes within the scala tympani, and the spatial relationship between them.
Collapse
|
35
|
Chikar JA, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Di Polo A, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Over-expression of BDNF by adenovirus with concurrent electrical stimulation improves cochlear implant thresholds and survival of auditory neurons. Hear Res 2008; 245:24-34. [PMID: 18768155 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2008] [Revised: 08/07/2008] [Accepted: 08/12/2008] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The survival of the auditory nerve in cases of sensorineural hearing loss is believed to be a major factor in effective cochlear implant function. The current study assesses two measures of cochlear implant thresholds following a post-deafening treatment intended to halt auditory nerve degeneration. We used an adenoviral construct containing a gene insert for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a construct that has previously been shown to promote neuronal survival in a number of biological systems. We implanted ototoxically deafened guinea pigs with a multichannel cochlear implant and delivered a single inoculation of an adenovirus suspension coding for BDNF (Ad.BDNF) into the scala tympani at the time of implantation. Thresholds to electrical stimulation were assessed both psychophysically and electrophysiologically over a period of 80 days. Spiral ganglion cell survival was analyzed at the 80 days time point. Compared to the control group, the Ad.BDNF treated group had lower psychophysical and electrophysiological thresholds as well as higher survival of spiral ganglion cells. Electrophysiological, but not psychophysical, thresholds correlated well with the density of spiral ganglion cells. These results indicate that the changes in the anatomy of the auditory nerve induced by the combination of Ad.BDNF inoculation and the electrical stimulation used for testing improved functional measures of CI performance.
Collapse
|
36
|
Pfingst BE, Burkholder-Juhasz RA, Zwolan TA, Xu L. Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays. Hear Res 2008; 242:172-83. [PMID: 18178350 PMCID: PMC2593127 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2007] [Revised: 11/20/2007] [Accepted: 11/20/2007] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Auditory prostheses use implanted electrode arrays that permit stimulation at many sites along the tonotopic axis of auditory neurons. Psychophysical studies demonstrate that measures of implant function, such as detection and discrimination thresholds, vary considerably across these sites, that the across-site patterns of these measures differ across subjects, and that the likely mechanisms underlying this variability differ across measures. Psychophysical and speech recognition studies suggest that not all stimulation sites contribute equally to perception with the prosthesis and that some sites might have negative effects on perception. Studies that reduce the number of active stimulation sites indicate that most cochlear implant users can effectively utilize a maximum of only about seven sites in their processors. These findings support a strategy for improving implant performance by selecting only the best stimulation sites for the processor map. Another approach is to revise stimulation parameters for ineffective sites in an effort to improve acuity at those sites. In this paper, we discuss data supporting these approaches and some potential pitfalls.
Collapse
|
37
|
Pfingst BE. Frontiers of auditory prosthesis research: implications for clinical practice. Hear Res 2008; 242:1-2. [PMID: 18616993 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
38
|
Su GL, Colesa DJ, Pfingst BE. Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds. Hear Res 2008; 241:64-72. [PMID: 18558467 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2007] [Revised: 04/11/2008] [Accepted: 04/28/2008] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown large decreases in cochlear implant psychophysical detection thresholds during the weeks following the onset of electrical testing. The current study sought to determine the variables underlying these threshold decreases by examining the effects of four deafening and implantation procedures on detection thresholds and implant impedances. Thirty-two guinea pigs were divided into four matched groups. Group I was deafened and implanted Day 0 and began electrical testing Day 1. Group II was deafened and implanted Day 0 and began electrical testing Day 45. Group III was deafened Day 0, implanted Day 45 and began electrical testing Day 46. Group IV was not predeafened but was implanted Day 0 and began electrical testing Day 1. All groups showed threshold decreases over time but the magnitude of change, time course and final stable threshold levels depended on the type and time course of treatment. Impedances increased over the first two weeks following the onset of electrical testing except in Group II. Results suggest that multiple mechanisms underlie the observed threshold shifts including (1) recovery of the cochlea from a temporary pathology caused by the deafening and/or implantation procedures, (2) effects of electrical stimulation on the auditory pathway, and (3) tissue growth in the implanted cochlea. They also suggest that surviving hair cells influence electrical threshold levels.
Collapse
|
39
|
Pfingst BE, Burkholder-Juhasz RA, Xu L, Thompson CS. Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2008; 123:1054-62. [PMID: 18247907 PMCID: PMC2431465 DOI: 10.1121/1.2828051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
In modern cochlear implants, much of the information required for recognition of important sounds is conveyed by temporal modulation of the charge per phase in interleaved trains of electrical pulses. In this study, modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) were used to assess listeners' abilities to detect sinusoidal modulation of charge per phase at each available stimulation site in their 22-electrode implants. Fourteen subjects were tested. MDTs were found to be highly variable across stimulation sites in most listeners. The across-site patterns of MDTs differed considerably from subject to subject. The subject-specific patterns of across-site variability of MDTs suggest that peripheral site-specific characteristics, such as electrode placement and the number and condition of surviving neurons, play a primary role in determining modulation sensitivity. Across-site patterns of detection thresholds (T levels), maximum comfortable loudness levels (C levels) and dynamic ranges (DRs) were not consistently correlated with across-site patterns of MDTs within subjects, indicating that the mechanisms underlying across-site variation in these measures differed from those underlying across-site variation in MDTs. MDTs sampled from multiple sites in a listener's electrode array might be useful for diagnosing across-subject differences in speech recognition with cochlear implants and for guiding strategies to improve the individual's perception.
Collapse
|
40
|
Xu L, Pfingst BE. Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses. Hear Res 2007; 242:132-40. [PMID: 18249077 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2007] [Revised: 12/16/2007] [Accepted: 12/19/2007] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Features of stimulation important for speech recognition in people with normal hearing and in people using implanted auditory prostheses include spectral information represented by place of stimulation along the tonotopic axis and temporal information represented in low-frequency envelopes of the signal. The relative contributions of these features to speech recognition and their interactions have been studied using vocoder-like simulations of cochlear implant speech processors presented to listeners with normal hearing. In these studies, spectral/place information was manipulated by varying the number of channels and the temporal-envelope information was manipulated by varying the lowpass cutoffs of the envelope extractors. Consonant and vowel recognition in quiet reached plateau at 8 and 12 channels and lowpass cutoff frequencies of 16 Hz and 4 Hz, respectively. Phoneme (especially vowel) recognition in noise required larger numbers of channels. Lexical tone recognition required larger numbers of channels and higher lowpass cutoff frequencies. There was a tradeoff between spectral/place and temporal-envelope requirements. Most current auditory prostheses seem to deliver adequate temporal-envelope information, but the number of effective channels is suboptimal, particularly for speech recognition in noise, lexical tone recognition, and music perception.
Collapse
|
41
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS. Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2007; 121:2236-46. [PMID: 17471737 PMCID: PMC2562216 DOI: 10.1121/1.2537501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Most modern cochlear-implant speech processors convey speech-envelope information using amplitude-modulated pulse trains. The use of higher-rate carrier pulse trains allows more envelope detail in the signal. However, neural response properties could limit the efficacy of high-rate carriers. This study examined effects of carrier rate and stimulation site, on psychophysical modulation detection thresholds (MDTs). Both of these variables could affect the neural representation of the carrier and thus affect perception of the modulation. Twelve human subjects with cochlear implants were tested. Phase duration of symmetric biphasic pulses was modulated sinusoidally at 40 Hz. MDTs were determined for monopolar stimulation at two carrier rates [250 and 4000 pulses/s (pps)], three stimulation sites (basal, middle, and apical), and five stimulus levels (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of the dynamic range). MDTs were lower for 250 pps carriers than for 4000 pps carriers in 71% of the 180 cases studied. Effects of carrier rate were greatest at the apical stimulation site and effects of stimulation site on MDTs depended on carrier rate. The data suggest a distinct disadvantage to using carrier pulse rates as high as 4000 pps. Stimulation site should be considered in evaluating modulation detection ability.
Collapse
|
42
|
Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination in the context of interleaved, multichannel stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of number of stimulated electrodes, pulse rate, and electrode separation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006; 7:308-16. [PMID: 16794913 PMCID: PMC2430008 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0045-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2006] [Accepted: 05/11/2006] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability of cochlear implantees to detect an increment in current level at one of many stimulated electrodes was investigated. Such changes in the electric profile provide information for cochlear implantees to discriminate numerous sounds, especially vowels. In Experiment 1, sensitivity to increases in current level at one stimulation site in the electric profile decreased as the number of stimulated electrodes increased. This outcome was most likely a result of decreased stimulus levels at individual electrodes that were required to retain a comfortable loudness when the number of active electrodes was increased. Experiment 2 investigated the effects of pulse rate and separation between stimulation sites when the levels in percent of dynamic range and number of stimulated electrodes were held constant. The effect of pulse rate and electrode separation varied among listeners. The sensitivity of 6 of 9 listeners was best at the pulse rate that they used clinically. This might have been the result of adaptation to the clinical pulse rate, or listeners might have chosen their inherently best pulse rate during the clinical fitting.
Collapse
|
43
|
Xu L, Zwolan TA, Thompson CS, Pfingst BE. Efficacy of a cochlear implant simultaneous analog stimulation strategy coupled with a monopolar electrode configuration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006; 114:886-93. [PMID: 16363059 DOI: 10.1177/000348940511401113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and clinical feasibility of using monopolar stimulation with the Clarion Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS) strategy in patients with cochlear implants. METHODS Speech recognition by 10 Clarion cochlear implant users was evaluated by means of 4 different speech processing strategy/electrode configuration combinations; ie, SAS and Continuous Interleaved Sampling (CIS) strategies were each used with monopolar (MP) and bipolar (BP) electrode configurations. The test measures included consonants, vowels, consonant-nucleus-consonant words, and Hearing in Noise Test sentences with a +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, subjective judgments of sound quality were obtained for each strategy/configuration combination. RESULTS All subjects but 1 demonstrated open-set speech recognition with the SAS/MP combination. The group mean Hearing in Noise Test sentence score for the SAS/MP combination was 31.6% (range, 0% to 92%) correct, as compared to 25.0%, 46.7%, and 37.8% correct for the CIS/BP, CIS/MP, and SAS/BP combinations, respectively. Intersubject variability was high, and there were no significant differences in mean speech recognition scores or mean preference ratings among the 4 strategy/configuration combinations tested. Individually, the best speech recognition performance was with the subject's everyday strategy/configuration combination in 72% of the applicable cases. If the everyday strategy was excluded from the analysis, the subjects performed best with the SAS/MP combination in 37.5% of the remaining cases. CONCLUSIONS The SAS processing strategy with an MP electrode configuration gave reasonable speech recognition in most subjects, even though subjects had minimal previous experience with this strategy/configuration combination. The SAS/MP combination might be particularly appropriate for patients for whom a full dynamic range of electrical hearing could not be achieved with a BP configuration.
Collapse
|
44
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L. Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10:331-341. [PMID: 16103644 DOI: 10.1159/125787350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2004] [Accepted: 04/21/2005] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Intersubject variability in perception is a prominent characteristic of people with cochlear implants. This study characterized intersubject differences using simple metrics based on psychophysical measures: maximum comfortable loudness levels (C levels) and dynamic ranges (DRs). In a group of 17 subjects, we assessed across-site variation (ASV) and across-site mean (ASM) values of C levels and DRs for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation, and examined the relation of these metrics to speech recognition across subjects. Significant negative correlations with speech recognition were found for ASVs of C levels for BP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high ASVs of BP C levels had poor speech recognition. Positive correlations with speech recognition were found for ASMs of C levels and ASMs of DRs for both BP and MP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high mean C levels and large mean DRs had better speech recognition. Thus, these psychophysical metrics are effective for diagnosis of individual differences in performance of subjects with cochlear implants. Furthermore, they point to some potentially useful treatment procedures.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L. Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10:331-41. [PMID: 16103644 PMCID: PMC1472183 DOI: 10.1159/000087350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2004] [Accepted: 04/21/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Intersubject variability in perception is a prominent characteristic of people with cochlear implants. This study characterized intersubject differences using simple metrics based on psychophysical measures: maximum comfortable loudness levels (C levels) and dynamic ranges (DRs). In a group of 17 subjects, we assessed across-site variation (ASV) and across-site mean (ASM) values of C levels and DRs for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation, and examined the relation of these metrics to speech recognition across subjects. Significant negative correlations with speech recognition were found for ASVs of C levels for BP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high ASVs of BP C levels had poor speech recognition. Positive correlations with speech recognition were found for ASMs of C levels and ASMs of DRs for both BP and MP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high mean C levels and large mean DRs had better speech recognition. Thus, these psychophysical metrics are effective for diagnosis of individual differences in performance of subjects with cochlear implants. Furthermore, they point to some potentially useful treatment procedures.
Collapse
|
46
|
Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2005; 202:170-9. [PMID: 15811709 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2004] [Accepted: 11/17/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
This study examined current-level discrimination ability in listeners with cochlear implants using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations. Current-level discrimination ability was measured as a function of electrode configuration (monopolar and bipolar), stimulation site (8 and 16) and level (5%, 15%, 25%, 50% and 80% of the dynamic range). Weber fractions usually decreased with increasing level. Differences in Weber fractions between monopolar and bipolar configurations were observed for listeners with short durations of deafness (<5 years). For these listeners, in the bipolar condition at the more-apical site 16, Weber fractions remained constant with increasing level, and the Weber fractions at low levels were smaller than in other conditions. We suggest that nerve density was better and the nerve-to-site-of-action-potential distance was smaller in these cases such that more fibers could be recruited with a unit increase in current level, leading to better current-level sensitivity.
Collapse
|
47
|
Xu L, Thompson CS, Pfingst BE. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2005; 117:3255-67. [PMID: 15957791 PMCID: PMC1414641 DOI: 10.1121/1.1886405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implants provide users with limited spectral and temporal information. In this study, the amount of spectral and temporal information was systematically varied through simulations of cochlear implant processors using a noise-excited vocoder. Spectral information was controlled by varying the number of channels between 1 and 16, and temporal information was controlled by varying the lowpass cutoff frequencies of the envelope extractors from 1 to 512 Hz. Consonants and vowels processed using those conditions were presented to seven normal-hearing native-English-speaking listeners for identification. The results demonstrated that both spectral and temporal cues were important for consonant and vowel recognition with the spectral cues having a greater effect than the temporal cues for the ranges of numbers of channels and lowpass cutoff frequencies tested. The lowpass cutoff for asymptotic performance in consonant and vowel recognition was 16 and 4 Hz, respectively. The number of channels at which performance plateaued for consonants and vowels was 8 and 12, respectively. Within the above-mentioned ranges of lowpass cutoff frequency and number of channels, the temporal and spectral cues showed a tradeoff for phoneme recognition. Information transfer analyses showed different relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues in the perception of various phonetic/acoustic features.
Collapse
|
48
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS. Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition. Audiol Neurootol 2004; 9:341-352. [PMID: 15467287 DOI: 10.1159/125781283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2004] [Accepted: 04/12/2004] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Functional implications of across-site variation in detection thresholds in subjects with cochlear implants were evaluated by comparing thresholds to speech recognition performance. Detection thresholds for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation of all available stimulation sites were assessed in 21 subjects with Nucleus CI24M and CI24R(CS) implants. We found significant negative correlations between speech recognition and within-subject across-site threshold variance for both BP and MP stimulation, but no significant correlation of speech recognition with mean threshold levels. These results suggest that across-site variance of detection thresholds could provide a useful early indication of the prognosis for speech recognition and might serve as an indicator for specific therapeutic approaches in individual subjects.
Collapse
|
49
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS. Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition. Audiol Neurootol 2004; 9:341-52. [PMID: 15467287 PMCID: PMC1450110 DOI: 10.1159/000081283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2004] [Accepted: 04/12/2004] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional implications of across-site variation in detection thresholds in subjects with cochlear implants were evaluated by comparing thresholds to speech recognition performance. Detection thresholds for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation of all available stimulation sites were assessed in 21 subjects with Nucleus CI24M and CI24R(CS) implants. We found significant negative correlations between speech recognition and within-subject across-site threshold variance for both BP and MP stimulation, but no significant correlation of speech recognition with mean threshold levels. These results suggest that across-site variance of detection thresholds could provide a useful early indication of the prognosis for speech recognition and might serve as an indicator for specific therapeutic approaches in individual subjects.
Collapse
|
50
|
Xu L, Pfingst BE. Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2003; 114:3024-7. [PMID: 14714781 PMCID: PMC1283139 DOI: 10.1121/1.1623786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in speech and music perception was investigated by Smith et al. [Nature (London) 416, 87–90 (2002)] using "auditory chimera" in which the envelope from one sound was paired with the fine structure of another. Smith et al. found that, when 4 to 16 frequency bands were used, recognition of English speech was dominated by the envelope, whereas recognition of melody was dominated by the fine structure. In the present study, Mandarin Chinese monosyllables were divided into 4, 8, or 16 frequency bands and the fine structure and envelope of one tone pattern were exchanged with those of another tone pattern of the same monosyllable. Five normal-hearing native Mandarin Chinese speakers completed a four-alternative forced-choice tone-identification task. In the vast majority of trials, subjects based their identification of the monosyllables on the fine structure rather than the envelope. Thus, the relative importance of envelope and fine structure for lexical-tone perception resembled that for melody recognition rather than that for English speech recognition. Delivering fine-structure information in cochlear implant stimulation could be particularly beneficial for lexical-tone perception.
Collapse
|