Vitamin C in critical illness: end of the story or still a place?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Critical illness is associated with decreased micronutrient levels, including vitamin C, an essential antioxidant for systemic inflammation. This review discusses the most recent evidence of high-dose vitamin C monotherapy in critically ill adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were published in 2022. A pilot study including 40 patients with septic shock could not detect significant differences in outcome parameters after administering vitamin C. A multicenter study with 124 septic patients showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality, while vitamin C was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney dysfunction. The LOVIT trial, an international prospective RCT in 872 septic patients, revealed an increased risk of the composite endpoint persistent organ dysfunction plus death at day 28 in the high-dose vitamin C group. Six systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA), including up to 4740 patients published before and 2 SRMA publications including these RCTs showed divergent results on clinical endpoints including mortality.

SUMMARY

The use of high-dose intravenous vitamin C cannot be recommended for the septic critically ill in clinical practice since the LOVIT trial. Further research is needed to evaluate its potential role in other critically ill patients.

[The Role of the Percutaneous Impella Pump in Anesthesia and Intensive Care]

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices and in particular the increasing use of the Impella device family has gained significant interest over the last two decades. Nowadays, its use plays a well-established key role in both the treatment of cardiogenic shock, and as a preventive and protective therapeutic option during high-risk procedures in both cardiac surgery and cardiology, such as complex percutaneous interventions (protected PCI). Thus, it is not surprising that the Impella device is more and more present in the perioperative setting and especially in patients on intensive care units. Despite the numerous advantages such as cardiac resting and hemodynamic stabilization, potential adverse events exist, which may lead to severe, but preventable complications, so that adequate education, early recognition of such events and a subsequent adequate management are crucial in patients with tMCS. This article provides an overview especially for anesthesiologists and intensivists focusing on technical basics, indications and contraindications for its use with special focus on the intra- and postoperative management. Furthermore, troubleshooting for most common complications for patients on Impella support is provided.

Statin loading before coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial

AIMS

Evidence suggests that a high-dose statin loading before a percutaneous coronary revascularization improves outcomes in patients receiving long-term statins. This study aimed to analyse the effects of such an additional statin therapy before surgical revascularization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial was conducted from November 2012 to April 2019 at 14 centres in Germany. Adult patients (n = 2635) with a long-term statin treatment (≥30 days) who were scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomly assigned to receive a statin-loading therapy or placebo at 12 and 2 h prior to surgery using a web-based system. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was a composite consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and a cerebrovascular event occuring within 30 days after surgery. Key secondary endpoints included a composite of cardiac death and MI, myocardial injury, and death within 12 months. Non-statistically relevant differences were found in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (2406 patients; 1203 per group) between the statin (13.9%) and placebo groups (14.9%) for the primary outcome [odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.18; P = 0.562] or any of its individual components. Secondary endpoints including cardiac death and MI (12.1% vs. 13.5%; OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12; P = 0.300), the area under the troponin T-release curve (median 0.398 vs. 0.394 ng/ml, P = 0.333), and death at 12 months (3.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.825) were comparable between treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

Additional statin loading before CABG failed to reduce the rate of MACCE occuring within 30 days of surgery.

What the clinician needs to know about medical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients in 2023: A narrative review

Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) represents an essential element in the medical care of critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Increasing awareness exists that energy and nutrients not only preserve body structures such as lean body/muscle mass but also represent promising therapeutic elements to target the profound metabolic, inflammatory, endocrinologic, and immunologic alterations occurring during critical illness. However, despite intense research activities for years, diverse aspects of MNT such as the optimal timing, dosing, and composition of energy and macronutrient supply, as well as the role of micronutrients, are still an issue of debate resulting from strong heterogeneity in methods and findings of respective studies. These discrepancies are also reflected in diverging recommendations of international clinical nutrition guidelines for specific topics. In addition, implementing targeted, personalized MNT strategies in routine clinical practice underlies difficulties and challenges resulting from disease-specific issues and/or organizational, structural, and educational aspects. This narrative review aims to summarize the most recent evidence relevant to clinical practice on selected aspects of MNT in adult patients in the ICU and to provide guidance for implementing evidence-based approaches for adequate energy and nutrient supply in the ICU setting.

Current practices in medical nutrition therapy in the cardiac surgical critical care setting - an international multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgery patients with prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at high-risk for acquired malnutrition. Medical nutrition therapy practices in cardiac surgery patients are unknown. The objective of this study is to describe current nutrition practices in critically ill cardiac surgery patients worldwide.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in 13 international ICUs involving mechanically ventilated cardiac surgery patients with an ICU stay of at least 72 hours. Collected data included calorie and protein prescription, type and time to initiation of nutrition, and actual quantity of energy and protein delivered (maximum: 12 days).

RESULTS

Among 237 enrolled patients, enteral nutrition (EN) was started, on average, 45 hours after ICU admission (range 0-277 hours; site average 53 [range 10-79 hours]). EN was prescribed in 187 (79%) patients and combined EN and parenteral nutrition (PN) in 33 (14%). Overall, patients received 44.2% (0.0-117.2%) of prescribed calories and 39.7% (0.0-122.8%) of prescribed protein. At a site level, the average nutritional adequacy was 47.5% (30.5-78.6%) for calories and 43.6% (21.7-76.6%) for protein received from all nutritional sources.

CONCLUSION

Critically ill cardiac surgery patients with prolonged ICU stay experience significant delays in starting EN and receive low levels of calories and protein. There exists tremendous variability in site performance, whereas achieving optimal nutrition performance is doable.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

A video abstract (Video S1) is provided with the supplementary materials. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Intravenous vitamin C monotherapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

A recent landmark randomized controlled trial (RCT) in septic patients demonstrated an increased risk of death and persistent organ dysfunction with intravenous Vitamin C (IVVC) monotherapy, which represents a disparate result from previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMA). We performed an updated SRMA of IVVC monotherapy to summarize and explore heterogeneity across current trials and conduct trial sequential analysis (TSA) to guard against type-I or type-II statistical errors.

METHODS

RCTs evaluating IVVC in adult critically ill patients were included. Four databases were searched from inception to 22 June 2022 without language restrictions. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Random effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio. TSA for mortality was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random effect model, alpha 5%, beta 10%, and relative risk reduction (RRR) of 30%, 25%, and 20%.

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs (n = 2130). IVVC monotherapy is associated with significant reduction in overall mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.89; p = 0.002; I² = 42%]. This finding is supported by TSA using RRR of 30% and 25%, and sensitivity analysis using fixed-effect meta-analysis. However, the certainty of our mortality finding was rated low using GRADE due to the serious risk of bias and inconsistency. In a priori subgroup analyses, we found no differences between single vs multicenter, higher (≥ 10,000 mg/day) vs lower dose and sepsis vs non-sepsis trials. Post-hoc, we found no differences in subgroup analysis of earlier (< 24 h) vs delayed treatment, longer (> 4 days) vs shorter treatment duration, and low vs other risk of bias studies. IVVC may have the greatest benefit in trials that enrolled patients above (i.e., > 37.5%; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.54-0.79) vs below (i.e., ≤ 37.5%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.16) median control group mortality (test for subgroup differences: p = 0.06), and TSA supported this.

CONCLUSIONS

IVVC monotherapy may be associated with mortality benefits in critically ill patients, particularly in patients with a high risk of dying. Given the low certainty of evidence, this potentially life-saving therapy warrants further studies to identify the optimal timing, dosage, treatment duration, and patient population that will benefit most from IVVC monotherapy. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42022323880. Registered 7th May 2022.

[Vitamin C and D supplementation in critically ill patients]

Micronutrient supplementation as part of the medical nutrition therapy for critically ill patients has received much attention in the past few years. Nevertheless, in clinical practice uncertainty remains about the optimal supplementation strategy, including which substance at which dosage should be administered at what time to specific groups of patients. Thus, the aim of this narrative review is to summarize the current evidence and recommendations for the micronutrients vitamin C and vitamin D. The physiological and pathophysiological roles of both vitamins are presented, recently published clinical trials are discussed, and the recommendations of the current guidelines are summarized. In addition, pragmatic tips for use in everyday clinical practice in the intensive care unit are given.

Short- and long term hyposmia, hypogeusia, dysphagia and dysphonia after facial burn injury - A prospective matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Facial burns frequently occur in occupational or household accidents. While dysphagia and dysphonia are known sequelae, little is known about impaired smell and taste after facial burns.

METHODS

In a prospective observational controlled study, we evaluated hyposmia via the Sniffin' Stick Test (SnS), hypogeusia via a taste strip test, and dysphonia and dysphagia via validated questionnaires acutely and one-year after burn, respectively. A matched control group consisting of a convenience sample of healthy volunteers underwent the same assessments.

RESULTS

Fifty-five facial burn patients (FB) and 55 healthy controls (CTR) were enrolled. Mean burn size was 11 (IQR: 29) % total body surface area (TBSA); CTR and FB were comparable regarding age, sex and smoking status. Acutely, hyposmia was present in 29% of the FB group (CTR: 9%, p = 0.014) and burn patients scored worse on the SnS than CTR (FB: 10; CTR: 11; IQR: 2; p = 0.013). Hyposmia per SnS correlated with subjective self-assessment. Hyposmia and SnS scores improved over time (FB acute: 10.5 IQR: 2; FB one year: 11; IQR: 2; p = 0.042) and returned to normal at one-year post burn in most patients who completed the study (lost to follow-up: 21 patients). Taste strip scores were comparable between FB and CTR, as was the acute prevalence of dysphagia and dysphonia.

CONCLUSION

Hyposmia acutely after facial thermal trauma appeared frequently in this study, especially when complicated by inhalation trauma or large TBSA involvement. Of all complete assessments, a fraction of burn patients retained hyposmia after one year while most improved over time to normal. Prevalence of dysphonia, dysphagia and hypogeusia was comparable to healthy controls in this study, perhaps due to overall minor burn severity.

Effect of High-Dose Selenium on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery Patients: The SUSTAIN CSX Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Selenium contributes to antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory pathways, which may improve outcomes in patients at high risk of organ dysfunctions after cardiac surgery.

Objective

To assess the ability of high-dose intravenous sodium selenite treatment to reduce postoperative organ dysfunction and mortality in cardiac surgery patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial took place at 23 sites in Germany and Canada from January 2015 to January 2021. Adult cardiac surgery patients with a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score-predicted mortality of 5% or more or planned combined surgical procedures were randomized.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system to receive either perioperative intravenous high-dose selenium supplementation of 2000 μg/L of sodium selenite prior to cardiopulmonary bypass, 2000 μg/L immediately postoperatively, and 1000 μg/L each day in intensive care for a maximum of 10 days or placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was a composite of the numbers of days alive and free from organ dysfunction during the first 30 days following cardiac surgery.

Results

A total of 1416 adult cardiac surgery patients were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 68.2 [10.4] years; 1043 [74.8%] male). The median (IQR) predicted 30-day mortality by European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score was 8.7% (5.6%-14.9%), and most patients had combined coronary revascularization and valvular procedures. Selenium did not increase the number of persistent organ dysfunction-free and alive days over the first 30 postoperative days (median [IQR], 29 [28-30] vs 29 [28-30]; P = .45). The 30-day mortality rates were 4.2% in the selenium and 5.0% in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50-1.36; P = .44). Safety outcomes did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

In high-risk cardiac surgery patients, perioperative administration of high-dose intravenous sodium selenite did not reduce morbidity or mortality. The present data do not support the routine perioperative use of selenium for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02002247.

The effect of higher protein dosing in critically ill patients with high nutritional risk (EFFORT Protein): an international, multicentre, pragmatic, registry-based randomised trial

BACKGROUND

On the basis of low-quality evidence, international critical care nutrition guidelines recommend a wide range of protein doses. The effect of delivering high-dose protein during critical illness is unknown. We aimed to test the hypothesis that a higher dose of protein provided to critically ill patients would improve their clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This international, investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, single-blinded, randomised trial was undertaken in 85 intensive care units (ICUs) across 16 countries. We enrolled nutritionally high-risk adults (≥18 years) undergoing mechanical ventilation to compare prescribing high-dose protein (≥2·2 g/kg per day) with usual dose protein (≤1·2 g/kg per day) started within 96 h of ICU admission and continued for up to 28 days or death or transition to oral feeding. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to high-dose protein or usual dose protein, stratified by site. As site personnel were involved in both prescribing and delivering protein dose, it was not possible to blind clinicians, but patients were not made aware of the treatment assignment. The primary efficacy outcome was time-to-discharge-alive from hospital up to 60 days after ICU admission and the secondary outcome was 60-day morality. Patients were analysed in the group to which they were randomly assigned regardless of study compliance, although patients who dropped out of the study before receiving the study intervention were excluded. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03160547.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 17, 2018, and Dec 3, 2021, 1329 patients were randomised and 1301 (97·9%) were included in the analysis (645 in the high-dose protein group and 656 in usual dose group). By 60 days after randomisation, the cumulative incidence of alive hospital discharge was 46·1% (95 CI 42·0%-50·1%) in the high-dose compared with 50·2% (46·0%-54·3%) in the usual dose protein group (hazard ratio 0·91, 95% CI 0·77-1·07; p=0·27). The 60-day mortality rate was 34·6% (222 of 642) in the high dose protein group compared with 32·1% (208 of 648) in the usual dose protein group (relative risk 1·08, 95% CI 0·92-1·26). There appeared to be a subgroup effect with higher protein provision being particularly harmful in patients with acute kidney injury and higher organ failure scores at baseline.

INTERPRETATION

Delivery of higher doses of protein to mechanically ventilated critically ill patients did not improve the time-to-discharge-alive from hospital and might have worsened outcomes for patients with acute kidney injury and high organ failure scores.

FUNDING

None.

Overview of oxidative stress and the role of micronutrients in critical illness

Inflammation and oxidative stress represent physiological response mechanisms to different types of stimuli and injury during critical illness. Its proper regulation is fundamental to cellular and organismal survival and are paramount to outcomes and recovery from critical illness. A proper maintenance of the delicate balance between inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune response is crucial for resolution from critical illness with important implications for patient outcome. The extent of inflammation and oxidative stress under normal conditions is limited by the antioxidant defense system of the human body, whereas the antioxidant capacity is commonly significantly compromised, and serum levels of micronutrients and vitamins significantly depleted in patients who are critically ill. Hence, the provision of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory nutrients may help to reduce the extent of oxidative stress and therefore improve clinical outcomes in patients who are critically ill. As existing evidence of the beneficial effects of antioxidant supplementation in patients who are critically ill is still unclear, actual findings about the most promising anti-inflammatory and antioxidative candidates selenium, vitamin C, zinc, and vitamin D will be discussed in this narrative review. The existing evidence provided so far demonstrates that several factors need to be considered to determine the efficacy of an antioxidant supplementation strategy in patients who are critically ill and indicates the need for adequately designed multicenter prospective randomized control trials to evaluate the clinical significance of different types and doses of micronutrients and vitamins in selected groups of patients with different types of critical illness.

Case presentation and panel discussion: Micronutrient therapy in critical illness

Over the past decade, the use of supraphysiologic doses of micronutrients (also called metabolic resuscitation) in critically ill patients has gained significant attention. Building upon preclinical and observational human data, numerous randomized controlled trials have tested the impact of multiple micronutrients on various outcomes in critically ill patients. At the 2022 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Preconference Course, three world-renowned speakers delivered talks on the (1) overall role of micronutrients and, specifically, (2) selenium and vitamin C and (3) vitamin D and zinc in critically ill patients. Here, the case presentation and discussion from the postsession question and answer period are presented. The moderator for this session was Jose Pimiento, MD, and the speakers and panelists were Christian Stoppe, MD, Todd Rice, MD, and Daren Heyland, MD.

Medical nutrition therapy in patients receiving ECMO: Evidence-based guidance for clinical practice

Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) inherit substantial disease-associated metabolic, endocrinologic, and immunologic modifications. Along with the technical components of ECMO, the aforementioned alterations may affect patients' needs and feasibility of adequate macronutrient and micronutrient supply and intake. Thus, patients receiving ECMO are at increased risk for iatrogenic malnutrition and require targeted individual medical nutrition therapy (MNT). However, specific recommendations for MNT in patients receiving ECMO are limited and, with some exceptions, based on an evidence base encompassing general patients who are critically ill. Consequently, clinician decision-making for MNT in patients receiving ECMO is unguided, which may further increase nutrition risk, culminating in iatrogenic malnutrition and ultimately affecting patient outcomes. The purpose of this article is to provide educational background and highlight specific points for MNT in adult patients receiving ECMO, which might serve as evidence-based guidance to develop institutional standard operating procedures and nutrition protocols for daily clinical practice.

History of scurvy and use of vitamin C in critical illness: A narrative review

In 1747, an important milestone in the history of clinical research was set, as the Scottish surgeon James Lind conducted the first randomized controlled trial. Lind was interested in scurvy, a severe vitamin C deficiency which caused the death of thousands of British seamen. He found that a dietary intervention with oranges and lemons, which are rich in vitamin C by nature, was effective to recover from scurvy. Because of its antioxidative properties and involvement in many biochemical processes, the essential micronutrient vitamin C plays a key role in the human biology. Moreover, the use of vitamin C in critical illness-a condition also resulting in death of thousands in the 21st century-has gained increasing interest, as it may restore vascular responsiveness to vasoactive agents, ameliorate microcirculatory blood flow, preserve endothelial barriers, augment bacterial defense, and prevent apoptosis. Because of its redox potential and powerful antioxidant capacity, vitamin C represents an inexpensive and safe antioxidant, with the potential to modify the inflammatory cascade and improve clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. This narrative review aims to update and provide an overview on the role of vitamin C in the human biology and in critically ill patients, and to summarize current evidence on the use of vitamin C in diverse populations of critically ill patients, in specific focusing on patients with sepsis and coronavirus disease 2019.

Proenkephalin A and bioactive adrenomedullin are useful for risk prognostication in cardiac surgery

Introduction

Various clinical scores have been developed to predict organ dysfunction and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, but outcome prediction may be inaccurate for some patient groups. Proenkephalin A (penKid) and bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) have emerged as promising biomarkers correlating with shock and organ dysfunction. This imposes the question of whether they can be used as prognostic biomarkers for risk stratification in the perioperative setting of cardiac surgery.

Methods

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively enrolled in this observational study. PenKid and bio-ADM plasma levels, as well as markers evaluating inflammation and organ dysfunction, were measured at five perioperative time points from before the induction of anesthesia to up to 48 h postoperatively. Clinical data regarding organ dysfunction and patient outcomes were recorded during the intensive care unit (ICU)-stay with a special focus on acute kidney injury (AKI).

Results

In 136 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the bio-ADM levels increased and the penKid levels decreased significantly over time. PenKid was associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the incidence of AKI, and renal replacement therapy (RRT). Bio-ADM was associated with lactate and the need for vasopressors. PenKid was useful to predict an ICU-length of stay (LOS)>1 day and added prognostic value to the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation Score (EuroSCORE) II when measured after the end of cardiopulmonary bypass and 24 h after cardiac surgery. For bio-ADM, the same was true when measured 24 h after surgery. PenKid also added prognostic value to the EuroSCORE II for the combined outcome "ICU length of stay >1 day and in-hospital mortality."

Conclusion

The combination of preoperative EuroSCORE II and intraoperative measurement of penKid may be more useful to predict a prolonged ICU LOS and increased mortality than EuroSCORE II alone. Bio-ADM correlates with markers of shock. More research is encouraged for early risk stratification and validation of penKid and bio-ADM as a tool involved in clinical decisions, which may enable the early initiation of organ protective strategies.

Elevated concentrations of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in serum and cerebral microdialysate are associated with delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Objective

Inflammation is increasingly recognized to be involved in the pathophysiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and may increase the susceptibility to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has been shown to be elevated in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after aSAH. Here, we determined MIF levels in serum, CSF and cerebral microdialysate (MD) at different time-points after aSAH and evaluated their clinical implications.

Methods

MIF levels were measured in serum, CSF and MD obtained from 30 aSAH patients during early (EP_d1-4), critical (CP_d5-15) and late (LP_d16-21) phase after hemorrhage. For subgroup analyses, patients were stratified based on demographic and clinical data.

Results

MIF levels in serum increased during CP_d5-15 and decreased again during LP_d16-21, while CSF levels showed little changes over time. MD levels peaked during EP_d1-4, decreased during CP_d5-15 and increased again during LP_d16-21. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly higher serum levels in patients with aneurysms located in the anterior vs. posterior circulation during CP_d5-15 (17.3 [15.1-21.1] vs. 10.0 [8.4-11.5] ng/ml, p = 0.009) and in patients with DCI vs. no DCI during CP_d5-15 (17.9 [15.1-22.7] vs. 11.9 [8.9-15.9] ng/ml, p = 0.026) and LP_d16-21 (17.4 [11.7-27.9] vs. 11.3 [9.2-12.2] ng/ml, p = 0.021). In addition, MIF levels in MD during CP_d5-15 were significantly higher in patients with DCI vs. no DCI (3.6 [1.8-10.7] vs. 0.2 [0.1-0.7] ng/ml, p = 0.026), while CSF levels during the whole observation period were similar in all subgroups.

Conclusion

Our findings in a small cohort of aSAH patients provide preliminary data on systemic, global cerebral and local cerebral MIF levels after aSAH and their clinical implications.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02142166.

An update of the effects of vitamins D and C in critical illness

Many critically ill patients are vitamin D and vitamin C deficient and the current international guidelines state that hypovitaminoses should be compensated. However, uncertainty about optimal dosage, timing and indication exists in clinical routine, mainly due to the conflicting evidence. This narrative review discusses both micronutrients with regards to pathophysiology, clinical evidence of benefits, potential risks, and guideline recommendations. Evidence generated from the most recent clinical trials are summarized and discussed. In addition, pragmatic tips for the application of these vitamins in the clinical routine are given. The supplementations of vitamin D and C represent cost-effective and simple interventions with excellent safety profiles. Regarding vitamin D, critically ill individuals require a loading dose to improve 25(OH)D levels within a few days, followed by a daily or weekly maintenance dose, usually higher doses than healthy individuals are needed. For vitamin C, dosages of 100-200 mg/d are recommended for patients receiving parenteral nutrition, but needs may be as high as 2-3 g/d in acutely ill patients.

Vitamin D deficiency in critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vitamin D's pleiotropic effects include immune modulation, and its supplementation has been shown to prevent respiratory tract infections. The effectivity of vitamin D as a therapeutic intervention in critical illness remains less defined. The current study analyzed clinical and immunologic effects of vitamin D levels in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study in patients receiving intensive care with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 ARDS. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D serum levels, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and immune cell subsets were measured on admission as well as after 10-15 days. Clinical parameters were extracted from the patient data management system. Standard operating procedures included the daily administration of vitamin D₃ via enteral feeding.

RESULTS

A total of 39 patients with COVID-19 ARDS were eligible, of which 26 were included in this study as data on vitamin D status was available. 96% suffered from severe COVID-19 ARDS. All patients without prior vitamin D supplementation (n = 22) had deficient serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Vitamin D supplementation resulted in higher serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D but not did not increase 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels after 10-15 days. Clinical parameters did not differ between patients with sufficient or deficient levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Only circulating plasmablasts were higher in patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≥30 ng/ml (p = 0.029). Patients with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels below 20 pg/ml required longer mechanical ventilation (p = 0.045) and had a worse acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of COVID-19 ARDS patients had vitamin D deficiency. 25-hydroxyvitamin D status was not related to changes in clinical course, whereas low levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D were associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and a worse APACHE II score.

A Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine for Treatment of Burn Injuries

BACKGROUND

Glutamine is thought to have beneficial effects on the metabolic and stress response to severe injury. Clinical trials involving patients with burns and other critically ill patients have shown conflicting results regarding the benefits and risks of glutamine supplementation.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with deep second- or third-degree burns (affecting ≥10% to ≥20% of total body-surface area, depending on age) within 72 hours after hospital admission to receive 0.5 g per kilogram of body weight per day of enterally delivered glutamine or placebo. Trial agents were given every 4 hours through a feeding tube or three or four times a day by mouth until 7 days after the last skin grafting procedure, discharge from the acute care unit, or 3 months after admission, whichever came first. The primary outcome was the time to discharge alive from the hospital, with data censored at 90 days. We calculated subdistribution hazard ratios for discharge alive, which took into account death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 1209 patients with severe burns (mean burn size, 33% of total body-surface area) underwent randomization, and 1200 were included in the analysis (596 patients in the glutamine group and 604 in the placebo group). The median time to discharge alive from the hospital was 40 days (interquartile range, 24 to 87) in the glutamine group and 38 days (interquartile range, 22 to 75) in the placebo group (subdistribution hazard ratio for discharge alive, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.04; P = 0.17). Mortality at 6 months was 17.2% in the glutamine group and 16.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.41). No substantial between-group differences in serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe burns, supplemental glutamine did not reduce the time to discharge alive from the hospital. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; RE-ENERGIZE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00985205.).

Clinical nutrition issues in 2022: What is missing to trust supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) in ICU patients?

A multidisciplinary group of international physicians involved in the medical nutrition therapy (MNT) of adult critically ill patients met to discuss the value, role, and open questions regarding supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) along with oral or enteral nutrition (EN), particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. This manuscript summarizes the discussions and results to highlight the importance of SPN as part of a comprehensive approach to MNT in critically ill adults and for researchers to generate new evidence based on well-powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The experts agreed on several key points: SPN has shown clinical benefits, resulting in this strategy being included in American and European guidelines. Nevertheless, its use is heterogeneous across European countries, due to the persistence of uncertainties, such as the optimal timing and the risk of overfeeding in absence of indirect calorimetry (IC), which results in divergent opinions and barriers to SPN implementation. Education is also insufficient. The experts agreed on actions needed to increase evidence quality on SPN use in specific patients at a given time point during acute critical illness or recovery.

Administration of vitamin D and its metabolites in critically ill adult patients: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The clinical significance of vitamin D administration in critically ill patients remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of vitamin D and its metabolites on major clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, including a subgroup analysis based on vitamin D status and route of vitamin D administration.

Methods

Major databases were searched through February 9, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of adult critically ill patients with an intervention group receiving vitamin D or its metabolites were included. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio (dichotomized outcomes) or mean difference (continuous outcomes). Risk of bias assessment included the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.

Results

Sixteen randomized clinical trials with 2449 patients were included. Vitamin D administration was associated with lower overall mortality (16 studies: risk ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62–0.97, p = 0.03; I² = 30%), reduced intensive care unit length of stay (12 studies: mean difference − 3.13 days, 95% CI − 5.36 to − 0.89, n = 1250, p = 0.006; I² = 70%), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (9 studies: mean difference − 5.07 days, 95% CI − 7.42 to − 2.73, n = 572, p < 0.0001; I² = 54%). Parenteral administration was associated with a greater effect on overall mortality than enteral administration (test of subgroup differences, p = 0.04), whereas studies of parenteral subgroups had lower quality. There were no subgroup differences based on baseline vitamin D levels.

Conclusions

Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients may reduce mortality. Parenteral administration might be associated with a greater impact on mortality. Heterogeneity and assessed certainty among the studies limits the generalizability of the results.

Trial registration: PROSPERO international prospective database of systematic reviews (CRD42021256939—05 July 2021).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04139-1.