Determination of lipase catalytic activity in two reference materials: BCR 693 and BCR 694 by titrimetry at constant pH

Because routine assays for pancreatic lipase catalytic activity are not yet standardized, between-method comparability is very poor. This is mainly due to the lack of reference materials (RMs). The aim of this study was to assign values of catalytic concentration to two human pancreatic lipase RMs, one prepared from human pancreatic juice (BCR 693), the other obtained by recombinant technology (BCR 694). Lipase catalytic activity was assayed in five experienced laboratories, using aliquots from the same lot of triolein emulsion and a standardized titrimetric procedure, optimized with regard to substrate, cofactors and pH. The accepted sets of data (n=4) gave a mean ± the corresponding uncertainty expressed as the 0.95 confidence interval of 1732±72 U/l and 1043±60 U/l for BCR 693 and 694, respectively. Transferability of the whole operating procedure proved to be quite satisfactory. The authors conclude that both RMs can be used to verify the correct implementation of the standardized measurement procedure and to assign values to secondary lipase materials (commercial calibrators, control products) which, in turn, ensures traceability to the standardized procedure in this study, and contributes to the harmonization of laboratory results according to the Directive for in vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices.

IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 4. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of alanine aminotransferase

This paper is the fourth in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 1. The Concept of Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes; Part 2. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Creatine Kinase; Part 3. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Lactate Dehydrogenase; Part 5. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase; Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase; Part 7. Certification of Four Reference Materials for the Determination of Enzymatic Activity of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase at 37 degrees C. A document describing the determination of preliminary upper reference limits is also in preparation. The procedure described here is deduced from the previously described 30 degrees C IFCC reference method. Differences are tabulated and commented on in Appendix 2.

IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part 5. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of aspartate aminotransferase

This paper is the fifth in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 1. The Concept of Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes; Part 2. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Creatine Kinase; Part 3. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Lactate Dehydrogenase; Part 4. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase; Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase; Part 7. Certification of Four Reference Materials for the Determination of Enzymatic Activity of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase at 37 degrees C. A document describing the determination of preliminary upper reference limits is also in preparation. The procedure described here is deduced from the previously described 30 degrees C IFCC reference method. Differences are tabulated and commented on in Appendix 3.

Preparation and characterization of reference materials for human pancreatic lipase: BCR 693 (from human pancreatic juice) and BCR 694 (recombinant)

There is a lack of certified reference material (CRM) for lipase catalytic activity. Consequently between-method comparability is very poor. The aim of this study was to produce two lipase CRMs, one from human pancreatic juice (BCR 693), and another using recombinant technologies (BCR 694). Lipase was purified from pancreatic juice, using column chromatography and isoelectric focusing. Recombinant lipase was produced with a transfected cell line and purified with column chromatography. Adding buffered bovine serum albumin and subsequent freeze-drying were used to stabilize both materials. A standardized titrimetric method was employed to compare their catalytic properties to those of two plasma pools of patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. About 5 kU (titrimetry, 37 degrees C) of each material were obtained. They were lyophilized without apparent modifications of their catalytic properties, which stayed identical to those exhibited by the enzyme present in patient's pools. Stability of both materials was estimated at several years when stored in a dry form at -20 degrees C. Both materials appear to have similar catalytic properties and stability and were found commutable as regards a reference method and a routine measurement procedure. An international certification campaign will be carried out to assign values to BCR 693 and BCR 694.

Evaluation of commutability of control materials

The commutability of 13 control materials was evaluated by performing parallel measurements on two different analysers: a Synchron CX-5 Delta from Beckman-Coulter and a Vitros 950 from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics. Twenty three clinical chemistry analytes (substrates, electrolytes and enzymatic activities) were determined in plasma from 15 different patients in order to define intermethod relationship for each analyte. The relationship observed for each control material was compared to those obtained for patients' specimens. The results show that commutability depends both on the tested analyte and on the control material. No totally commutable material has been found for the whole set of tested parameters. Most control materials were commutable for inorganic phosphate, glucose, chloride, triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase, amylase and y-glutamyltransfera-se, but less than a quarter of control materials were commutable for sodium, calcium, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase and lipase. Seven materials were commutable for more than half of the analytes, whereas five control materials were commutable for less than a quarter of these analytes. We propose to verify the commutability of materials before their use in an external quality control assessement.

IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. Part 3. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of lactate dehydrogenase

This paper is the third in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 1. The Concept of Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes; Part 2. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Creatine Kinase; Part 4. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase; Part 5. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase; Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of gamma-Glutamyltransferase; Part 7. Certification of Four Reference Materials tamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase at 37 degrees C. A document describing the determination of preliminary upper reference limits is also in preparation. The procedure described here is deduced from the previously described 30 degrees C IFCC reference method (1). Differences are tabulated and commented on in Appendix 1.

IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. Part 1. The concept of reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes

This paper is the first in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and with the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 2. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Creatine Kinase; Part 3. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Lactate Dehydrogenase; Part 4. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase; Part 5. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase; Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic fication of Four Reference Materials for the Determination of Enzymatic Activity of y-Glutamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase at 37 degrees C. A document describing the determination of preliminary reference values is also in preparation.

IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. Part 2. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of creatine kinase

This paper is the second in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 1. The Concept of Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes; Part 3. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Lactate Dehydrogenase; Part 4. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase; Part 5. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase; Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of gamma-Glutamyltransferase; Part 7. Certification of Four Reference Materials for the Determination of Enzymatic Activity of gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase at 37 degrees C. A document describing the determination of preliminary reference values is also in preparation. The pro- described 30 degrees C IFCC reference method (1). Differences are tabulated and commented on in Appendix 3.

[Enzyme calibrators: principle and practical use]

Results of catalytic activities of enzymes are highly dependent on the measurement procedures and on local conditions. Thus, only poorly marked improvement of interlaboratory comparability of results have been observed in clinical enzymology. To solve this problem, SFBC and IFCC have proposed to use "validated enzyme calibrators". Standardised operating procedures adapted to 37 C have been developed by IFCC for the most commonly used enzymes in clinical chemistry, and will be soon published. Reference materials which have been certified with these SOPs can be used as calibrators for a set of measurement methods which exhibit the same analytical specificity. Calibrators must be commutable, a property that must be checked experimentally. It is possible to produce stable and commutable materials for the calibration of a set of methods. Interest of this approach has been demonstrated for several enzymes. Results of two studies presented here show that the comparison of results to the upper limit of reference ranges does not improve the interlaboratory comparability of results in contrast to the calibration of different methods by a common calibrator which allowed to reach an interlaboratory CV close to 4% for ALT and gammaGT.

IFCC Primary Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes at 37°C. Part 7. Certification of Four Reference Materials for the Determination of Enzymatic Activity of γ-Glutamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase according to IFCC Reference Procedures at 37°C

This paper is the seventh in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 1. The Concept of Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes; Part 2. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Creatine Kinase; Part 3. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Lactate Dehydrogenase; Part 4. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase; Part 5. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase; Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase. A document describing the determination of preliminary reference values is also in preparation. The certification of the catalytic activity concentrations as determined by the recently elaborated IFCC primary reference methods at 37 degrees C of four enzyme preparations, namely IRMM/IFCC 452 (gamma-glutamyltransferase), IRMM/IFCC 453 (lactate dehydrogenase 1), IRMM/IFCC 454 (alanine aminotransferase) and IRMM/IFCC 455 (creatine kinase) is described. Homogeneity data were derived from previous results. Stability was assessed using recently obtained data as well as data from previous stability studies. The collaborative study for value assignment was performed under a strict quality control scheme to ensure traceability to the primary reference method. Uncertainty of the materials was assessed in compliance with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. The certified values obtained at 37 degrees C are 1.90 microkat/l +/- 0.04 microkat/l (114.1 U/l +/- 2.4 U/l), for gamma-glutamyltransferase, 8.37 microkat/l +/- 0.12 microkat/l (502 U/l +/- 7 U/l), for lactate dehydrogenase 1, 3.09 microkat/l +/- 0.07 microkat/l (186 U/l +/- 4 U/l), for alanine aminotransferase and 1.68 microkat/l +/- 0.07 microkat/l (101 U/l +/- 4 U/l), for creatine kinase. The materials are intended for internal quality control as well as for the evaluation of test systems as required by recent European Union legislation. Furthermore, the materials can be used to transfer accuracy from a reference method to a routine procedure provided the procedures exhibit the same analytical specificity and the certified materials are commutable.

IFCC Primary Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes at 37C. Part 6. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of γ-Glutamyltransferase

This paper is the sixth in a series dealing with reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C and the certification of reference preparations. Other parts deal with: Part 1. The Concept of Reference Procedures for the Measurement of Catalytic Activity Concentrations of Enzymes; Part 2. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Creatine Kinase; Part 3. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Lactate Dehydrogenase; Part 4. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase; Part 5. Reference Procedure for the Measurement of Catalytic Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase; Part 7. Certification of Four Reference Materials for the Determination of Enzymatic Activity of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Alanine Aminotransferase and Creatine Kinase at 37 degrees C A document describing the determination of preliminary upper reference limits is also in preparation. The procedure described here is deduced from the previously described 30 degrees C IFCC reference method. Differences are tabulated and commented on in Appendix 1.

[Harmonization of practices: application to the measurement of enzymatic activities used in prevention, screening, diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring]

The large metrological variation (CV, about 25%) observed between laboratories, at the national French level, for the measurement of enzymatic activities results in a loss of efficiency in using laboratory results. Current data show that the standardisation of methods is insufficient to solve this problem and needs to be completed by an harmonisation of the practices including the use of a common reference (calibrator). The present work, carried out by the joint working group between laboratories of the Centres for Periodic Health Examination and the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC), deals mainly with the feasibility and evaluation of the improvement of the consistency of the results. Twenty laboratories participated in this study. Five independent surveys were conducted during an height month period. Two enzymes were selected because of their clinical importance and their interest in prevention, screening, diagnosis or epidemiology: ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and GGT (gamma-glutamyltransferase). In each survey three kinds of samples i.e. control sera, candidate calibrators and human serum pools, each of them at two levels of activity (one physiological and the other pathological) were measured in duplicate. The low intra-laboratory imprecision and the high degree of the standardisation of used methods, due to an important effort previously done in this field, permitted to consider a common calibration. The stability and mainly the commutability, i.e. the ability for the candidate calibrator to show a behaviour similar to that of human samples towards the used methods, allowed to reduce the inter-laboratory variation by a half to two third-fold, reaching a coefficient of variation < 5% similar to those observed for cholesterolemia or glycemia. This level of consistency should permit to use common reference limits and common decision limits, after validation of this approach in real practice. The consequences of the harmonisation of practices, extended to the all laboratories, exceed largely the scope of this study. The reduction of the uncertainty and a better approach of the accuracy for the measurement of enzymatic activities should led to a real benefit for the patients in terms of prevention, screening, diagnosis or therapeutic monitoring and consequently for the public health.

Preparation of enzyme calibration materials

Standardisation in clinical enzymology needs not only reference methods but also reference materials. While single-enzyme reference enzymes have been developed, a multienzyme certified reference material (MECRM) available in high amount remains to be produced. To transfer trueness from the value of the reference system to patients' results, validated enzyme calibrators (EC) are also needed. Both the MECRM and the ECs must exhibit the same catalytic properties as the corresponding enzymes in human plasma. Moreover, commutability of these materials with patients' samples must be experimentally tested for one or a set of methods defined by an analytical specificity equal to that of the reference method. Various experimental studies have shown that the commutability of an enzyme material depends on the source of enzyme and its purification process, the matrix (including cofactors, effectors, additives, stabilisers... ) and the mode of processing of the final material. To promote intermethod calibration in clinical enzymology, a collaborative programme between the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM, Geel, Belgium) and IFCC corporate members is in progress for the development of a MECRM containing amylase, ALT, AST, ALP, CK, GGT, LDH, and lipase and exhibiting a wide and defined commutability.

Interassay calibration as a major contribution to the comparability of results in clinical enzymology

OBJECTIVE

Factors contributing to the applicability of interassay calibration of methods measuring enzyme catalytic activities are described. Also discussed are the properties essential for such a material. Similarity of specificity for the methods to be calibrated as well as commutability between the material(s) intended to be used as calibrator are the main criteria to be satisfied.

RESULT

Several examples demonstrated that interassay calibration is feasible but a multi-enzyme calibrator with a wide commutability for the most popular methods remains to be developed. This is the project of the IFCC Working Group on Calibrators in Clinical Enzymology (WG-CCE). Several experimental data are also presented that indicate that the temperature at which the reaction is carried out is not a limiting factor in the implementation of interassay calibration in clinical enzymology.

Validation of an enzyme calibrator--an IFCC guideline. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this guideline is to improve standardization in clinical enzymology in order to improve intermethod comparability of patients' results.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The reference system, combination of the reference method and the reference material, is used to produce a reference value for a given catalytic activity. Sets of methods are formed of methods exhibiting the same analytical specificity. Materials intended to be used as enzyme calibrators are experimentally checked for their commutability.

RESULTS

The transfer of accuracy from the reference value to patients' results is dependent on methods (analytical specificity) and on materials (experimentally assessed commutability). The feasibility of this approach was demonstrated with materials of high level for several enzymes and for each of them for several routine methods.

CONCLUSION

Expected advantages of this approach in clinical enzymology are presented.

[A progress in the standardization in clinical enzymology using calibrators adapted to several techniques]

Results in enzymology obtained in routine conditions, differ considerably according to the measurement procedures, and the use of conversion factors is not an advisable solution. Some studies show that between-laboratory agreement of results can be improved by using validated enzyme calibrators. The conditions, which are required to define a strategy for the development of such calibrators, are described in a first part. The example of lipase activity, which is measured in routine conditions with important between-method discrepancy, is studied in a second part. This example emphasised the need of an a priori control of the validity of the calibrators. Under these conditions, between-method agreement is in fact considerably improved. With the collaboration of manufacturers for the development of validated enzyme multicalibrators, it will be possible to improve the efficiency of the information transmitted by clinical chemists to clinicians. Thus, enzyme activities measurements could benefit from the same improvement as immunoassay of proteins with the use of CRM 470 by manufacturers to calibrate their standards.

Importance of standardization of lipase assays by using appropriate calibrators

Comparability of lipase catalytic activities was poor when lipase was determined in 50 patients' specimens by a turbidimetric (Boehringer) and a colorimetric (Sigma) assay. Mean values of results differed by a ratio of 2.39. Optimal common conditions were defined for the titration of lipase activity in two commercial calibrators and in a home-purified preparation of human pancreatic lipase (HPL). When using these titers for each calibrator, comparability was greatly improved (ratio = 1.25). This result indicates that a significant part of between-method discrepancy is due to the lack of a reference method for the titration of lipase calibrators. Intermethod behavior of each material was compared with that of patients' specimens. By using HPL as calibrator, comparability was still dramatically improved (ratio = 1.01). This study shows the importance of the validation of a material for defined routine measurement procedures, before its use as calibrator.

Importance of standardization of lipase assays by using appropriate calibrators

Comparability of lipase catalytic activities was poor when lipase was determined in 50 patients' specimens by a turbidimetric (Boehringer) and a colorimetric (Sigma) assay. Mean values of results differed by a ratio of 2.39. Optimal common conditions were defined for the titration of lipase activity in two commercial calibrators and in a home-purified preparation of human pancreatic lipase (HPL). When using these titers for each calibrator, comparability was greatly improved (ratio = 1.25). This result indicates that a significant part of between-method discrepancy is due to the lack of a reference method for the titration of lipase calibrators. Intermethod behavior of each material was compared with that of patients' specimens. By using HPL as calibrator, comparability was still dramatically improved (ratio = 1.01). This study shows the importance of the validation of a material for defined routine measurement procedures, before its use as calibrator.

Production and certification of an enzyme reference material for pancreatic alpha-amylase (CRM 476)

We describe the preparation of a lyophilized material containing purified human pancreatic alpha-amylase and the certification of its catalytic concentration. The enzyme was purified from human pancreas by ammonium sulphate precipitation and chromatography successively on DEAE-Sephacel, CM-Sepharose and Sephadex G-75. The purified enzyme had a specific activity of 52.9 kU/g protein and was > 99% pure on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Only trace amounts of lipase and lactate dehydrogenase were detected in the purified fraction. The purified pancreatic alpha-amylase had a molar mass of 57,500 g/mol and an isoelectric point at 7.1. The material was prepared by diluting the purified alpha-amylase in a matrix containing PIPES buffer 25 mmol/l, pH 7.0, sodium chloride 50 mmol/l, calcium chloride 1.5 mmol/l, EDTA 0.5 mmol/l and human serum albumin 30 g/l, dispensing in ampoules and freeze-drying. The ampoules were homogeneous and the yearly loss of activity on the basis of accelerated degradation studies was less than 0.01% at -20 degrees C. The certified value for alpha-amylase catalytic concentration in the reconstituted reference material is 555 U/l +/- 11 U/l when measured by the specified method at 37 degrees C. The material can be used to verify the comparability of results from laboratories, for intra-laboratory quality control or for calibration of alpha-amylase catalytic concentration measurements.

Catalytic properties and stability of lipase purified from human pancreatic juice

Catalytic properties of a preparation of human pancreatic lipase purified from pancreatic juice have been compared to those of the enzyme present in pooled plasma from patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. They were very similar as regards influence of effectors (sodium deoxycholate, colipase and Ca2+), optimal pH and apparent KM in optimized conditions. The stability of the preparation appeared to be satisfactory. It was found to be stable for at least 200 days in a liquid form at +4 degrees C and predictive degradation rates per year of the lyophilized form at +4 degrees C and -20 degrees C were 0.06% and 0.00%, respectively. The close similarity of properties of this preparation with those of a recombinant human pancreatic lipase produced in V79 Chinese hamster lung cells suggests that both approaches (purification from human pancreatic juice and gene transfer technology) could be used to produce a suitable reference material for this enzyme.

Usefulness of reference materials in calibration of enzyme activities

alpha-Amylase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase were studied in a multicentre evaluation. Analyses were performed on different patient samples. Each enzyme was assayed in two different laboratories at both 30 and 37 degrees C, with widely used reagent kits and with the IFCC reference method (if in existence). Results differed considerably according to the measurement procedure. Data also showed that it was not possible to employ a constant conversion factor for one enzyme and different techniques between 30 and 37 degrees C. Calibration with three reference materials extensively improved the intermethod consistency for most of the tested measurement procedures. It was possible to transfer accuracy from the method used for the certification of the reference material to routine procedures, by using the reference material as calibrator. Temperature did not seem to be a crucial variable for the implement of the enzyme calibrator approach.

Transferability of lipase titrimetric assays: deductions from an interlaboratory study

Following the selection of the most appropriate method for emulsification and the optimization of the reaction medium, interlaboratory studies were conducted to check the effect of preparing substrates and measuring the catalytic concentration of lipase at different sites as well as the effect of transport on emulsion. The determinations of lipase activity in an abnormal chemistry control against emulsions prepared by two laboratories (and used by both laboratories) and, also, against five separate emulsions prepared by one laboratory (and used by five different laboratories) resulted in average enzyme activity values (2234 +/- 125 and 2263 +/- 204 U/l respectively) which are not statistically different. Standard preparations of lipase, control sera and reference materials can therefore be titrated according to the procedure followed by at least two laboratories for at least 3 days against two separate emulsions.