P07-11 Physical activity promotion in the German healthcare system - Establishing pathways of exercise referral for persons with noncommunicable diseases

Background

Exercise referral schemes (ERS) are embedded in the routine practice of healthcare systems in many countries (e.g. Sweden and New Zealand). In primary healthcare, ERS are recommended to sustainably increase physical activity (PA) levels among patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCD). Yet, the German health care system currently only incorporates interventions that primarily focus on improving functional outcomes but hardly aim at increasing PA levels. This presentation introduces an ongoing research project that aims to develop, implement and evaluate an ERS to promote PA for persons with NCD within the German healthcare system.

Methods

In the first phase of the project, a concept of an ERS was developed using a participatory research approach that involved relevant stakeholders such as physicians, funding agencies, PA providers, and patient representatives. The development process comprised three steps: 1) interviews to gather stakeholders' ideas of an ERS; 2) a literature review to collect evidence on key elements of international ERS; 3) three stakeholder meetings to combine scientific evidence with stakeholders' perspectives (co-creation). Subsequently, the ERS will be implemented, tested and evaluated in a regional pilot project using a pragmatic trial design. Finally, a concept for scaling-up the ERS to the German national level will be developed.

Results

As result of the co-creation process, the following key elements were defined to be part of the ERS: Screening, short counselling and provision of a referral form by a physician; initial assessment, counselling, individual PA recommendations, re-assessment and follow-up by exercise professionals. Additional aspects considered important for the implementation of the ERS were ensuring good communication and feedback between all participating health professionals, as well as an overview of all local physical activity offers and exercise professionals (database). These preliminary findings were combined into a draft of the ERS.

Conclusions

The participatory research approach employed by our project yielded the first draft of an ERS with a specific focus on PA promotion among persons with NCD within the German healthcare system. In the upcoming project stage, this ERS concept will be further elaborated and prepared for implementation and evaluation at a regional level.

S11 Improving knowledge co-creation and participation in physical activity promotion: The cooperative planning approach

A central problem of current efforts to promote health and physical activity (PA) is that many successful projects remain stuck in the demonstration phase and are not implemented successfully at scale. The use of participatory and/or co-creation approaches has been suggested to avoid this ?pilot project trap? and better adapt interventions to target group needs and setting specificities.

This symposium intends to introduce to an international audience a particular participatory concept that has become increasingly popular in PA promotion in Germany in recent years: The Cooperative Planning approach has been successfully used in sport facility planning, local and regional PA policy development, and various settings of PA promotion (incl. kindergartens, schools, vocational training, and communities). The workshop will shed light on the theoretical background and methodology of Cooperative Planning as well as its specific application in select settings.

The first presentation will introduce the concept of Cooperative Planning, outline potential areas of application, and compare it with other popular participatory and co-creation approaches in PA promotion. Following this, we will provide evidence from ongoing projects employing the approach to promote PA in kindergartens (Presentation 2) and in the community setting (Presentation 3). Presentation 4 will introduce an example from the retirement home setting and also highlight ways of combining Cooperative Planning with other approaches such as photovoice and participatory evaluation. The final presentation will provide an outlook on the future extension of the concept by introducing the idea of the Practice Dive, which may be used to further optimize knowledge co-creation between researchers and practitioners.

A closer look at the Cooperative Planning approach is both timely and relevant for an international audience for a number of reasons: Conceptually, Cooperative Planning is a theory-based framework that combines ideas of participation and co-creation for PA into an innovative whole-of-system approach. From a practical PA promotion perspective, it transcends many existing techniques by focusing both on engaging multipliers and members of the target group, and by involving all of them in the decisive intervention development process (e.g. rather than only via opinion polls or focus groups). This symposium will allow us to combine evidence from four different projects, highlighting both the specificities of working in different settings as well as different aspects and possible extensions of the Cooperative Planning approach.

P07-04 A systematic review of key interventional elements in international exercise referral schemes

Background

With the first initiatives dating back to the 1990s, the past two decades have seen a rapid increase in the use of exercise referral schemes (ERS) worldwide. Despite the accumulating evidence on their effectiveness, there are currently no international guidelines available to inform the design of such interventions. The key elements and processes employed vary both within and between countries. This systematic review aims to address this frequently overlooked topic by identifying elements that are predominant in international ERS.

Methods

Scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus) and grey literature sources were systematically searched. In order to collect the information relevant for understanding and visualizing all ERS models, a broad spectrum of document types was considered eligible for inclusion, i.e. randomized controlled or pragmatic trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, case reports, qualitative studies, economic evaluations, mixed designs, policy documents, and official governmental reports. We extracted data on scheme components, contents, and main actors involved in scheme delivery. Cross-functional flowcharts were employed to facilitate comparison between different ERS designs: Firstly, the collected data were visualized in flowcharts indicating the pathway a patient follows from beginning to end of an individual ERS. Secondly, elements that appeared more frequently across all included ERS were identified.

Results

Preliminary results identified 18 models of ERS that were eligible for data analysis, including Green Prescription (New Zealand), Hreyfiseðill (Iceland), National Exercise Referral Scheme (Wales). Program designs ranged from short advice by a primary healthcare professional to physical activity prescription and/or further referral to affiliated health professionals. The prevailing actors involved in scheme delivery were physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, training experts, physical activity providers, and coordinators. Seven predominant elements emerged from the comparison between ERS designs: assessment, counselling, individualized physical activity recommendations, written prescription, behavior change techniques, support person, and follow-up.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that takes a closer look at the design characteristics of ERS across the world. Our preliminary results indicate that there are seven key elements. The contribution of these elements on the effectiveness of ERS needs to be explored in future research.

Cross-country collaboration for physical activity promotion: experiences from the European Union Physical Activity Focal Points Network

Background

An analysis of currently existing partnerships and cross-country collaboration for physical activity (PA) promotion is valuable for understanding how such partnerships operate, and how they impact national PA promotion efforts. This study aimed to outline the formation and development of the European Union’s (EU) Physical Activity Focal Points Network, to evaluate its outputs and benefits and to describe its potential and challenges.

Methods

A mixed methods approach were employed, including document analysis, semi-structured interviews with key officials and an online evaluation survey with the focal points.

Results

The network was founded in 2014. Its main task is to coordinate the national collection of information for the EU’s Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) Monitoring Framework. Besides collecting data, focal points usually meet twice a year to share best practices and plan activities for the promotion of PA within the EU. The results of the evaluation survey show that participation in the network helped members specify goals for PA promotion, gain more knowledge regarding how to promote PA, identify more opportunities to promote PA in their country and to join a collaborative project with other countries.

Conclusions

The study shows that the EU Physical Activity Focal Points Network may serve as an example of successful cross-country collaboration in PA promotion. The network has been able to make a contribution to monitoring the implementation of the EU Council Recommendation on HEPA across sectors in particular and of PA promotion in the EU in general.

A proposed checklist for climate-friendly sport and exercise programmes

BACKGROUND

Fighting the climate crisis is the greatest challenge of our time and will touch all aspects of people's lives. In this context, the United Nations (UN) have called on the sport sector to reduce its negative impacts on the environment and show 'climate leadership'. While some efforts have already been made with regards to mega sport events, there is still a dearth of approaches on limiting the climate impact of recreational sport and exercise programmes.

METHODS

Based on the UN-Framework 'Sports for Climate Action', literature reviews and additional desk research, a checklist to support local level stakeholders in providing climate-friendly sport and exercise programmes was developed.

RESULTS

The proposed checklist consists of five dimensions that need to be considered when designing and offering a climate-friendly sport and exercise programme: (i) active transport to exercise programmes, (ii) the carbon footprint of different types of exercises, (iii) low carbon sport clothing and equipment, (iv) instructors as champions for climate action and (v) advertising and communication. These five dimensions result in a 16-item checklist that supports the planning, advertising, implementation and evaluation of climate-friendly sport and exercise programmes.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed checklist intends to facilitate the development of climate-friendly sport and exercise programmes. However, additional work is needed to test the implementation of the checklist at the local level. While the sport sector can make its own contributions to reduce its climate impact, intersectoral action is needed to improve infrastructure for active transport and to build sustainable sport facilities.

Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial

Background

While effective physical activity referral schemes (PARSs) and related structures for promoting physical activity (PA) already exist in several countries, in Germany, PARSs have not yet been implemented systematically and nationwide. Through a co-production approach with relevant actors in the German healthcare system, a PARS was developed, and an implementation plan was created (e.g. financing). This study protocol aims to evaluate the developed PARS for people with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Germany regarding its potential effectiveness and implementation success.

Methods

To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation success of the PARS, we will apply a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in Hybrid II design by comparing two intervention groups (PARS vs PA advice [PAA]). The trial will take place in the Nürnberg metropolitan region, with 24 physician practices recruiting 567 people with NCDs. Both groups will receive brief PA advice from a physician to initially increase the participants’ motivation to change their activity level. Subsequently, the PARS group will be given individualised support from an exercise professional to increase their PA levels and be transferred to local exercise opportunities. In contrast, participants in the PAA group will receive only the brief PA advice as well as information and an overview of regional PA offerings to become more active at their own initiative. After 12 and 24 weeks, changes in moderate to vigorous PA and in physical activity-related health competence (movement competence, control competence, self-regulation competence) will be measured as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include changes in quality of life. To measure implementation success, we refer to the RE-AIM framework and draw on patient documentation, interviews, focus groups and surveys of the participating actors (physicians, exercise professionals).

Discussion

Through a between-group comparison, we will investigate whether additional individual support by an exercise professional compared to brief PA advice alone leads to higher PA levels in people with NCDs. The acceptance and feasibility of both interventions in routine care in the German healthcare system will also be evaluated.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04947787. Registered 01 June 2021.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13833-2.

"For me, it's just a piece of freedom"-Increased empowerment through physical activity promotion among socially disadvantaged women

Introduction

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an effective health promotion approach for reaching socially disadvantaged groups. However, there is limited evidence on how such interventions and their effects can be reproduced across time and place. The present study examines the effects of BIG (i.e., movement as an investment in health), a long-standing German CBPR project. Since 2005, BIG has aimed to empower women in difficult life situations to increase control over their health determinants and reduce social inequalities by promoting physical activity. One of BIG's key features is its implementation in several German municipalities since 2005. This study explores (a) whether participation could change women's empowerment, and (b) how increased empowerment affects other areas of women's lives.

Methods

With a total of 63 interviewees (i.e., 40 participating women, 7 trainers, 3 project coordinators, and 13 stakeholders), we conducted 53 semi-structured qualitative interviews in five BIG communities between 2007 and 2011. Some interviews were conducted with two people simultaneously. The interview guide contained questions on various dimensions of empowerment (e.g., project engagement, increased self-efficacy, and developed competencies). Framework analysis was used for the analytical process.

Results

BIG contributed to women's empowerment in various ways, including increased self-efficacy, social network promotion, competency development, and increased motivation to change physical activity behavior. Women who took on added tasks and became more involved in project planning also strengthened their organizational empowerment. Furthermore, increased empowerment had a positive influence on the women's quality of life, family, and professional lives.

Conclusion

The novel findings helped in understanding the effects of a complex empowerment-based approach that promoted physical activity among women in difficult life situations. Future research should focus on the long-term effects of these programs and their transferability to other sites. Further effort is necessary in the area of public health policy.

Präventionsdilemma auf kommunaler Ebene?

Hintergrund

Von Gesundheitsförderung profitieren häufig vorwiegend sozial privilegierte Personen während sozial Benachteiligte seltener erreicht werden. Ob dieses Präventionsdilemma auch auf kommunaler Ebene besteht, wurde bislang kaum erforscht.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die Studie untersucht anhand von zwei bayernweiten Projektausschreibungen zur kommunalen Bewegungsförderung, ob sozioökonomisch deprivierte Kommunen, die geringe Angebotsstrukturen der Gesundheitsförderung aufweisen, durch solche Ausschreibungen erreicht werden und welche Faktoren die Bereitschaft zur Beteiligung beeinflussen.

Methoden

Es werden Bevölkerungsdaten und sozioökonomische Deprivationsdaten von (n = 171) Kommunen aus drei Gruppen (teilnehmende/interessierte Kommunen und deprivierte Vergleichskommunen) verglichen. Durch eine systematische Internetrecherche werden die Gesundheitsförderungsaktivitäten ausgewählter Kommunen erhoben. Barrieren und Förderfaktoren für die Umsetzung der Projekte werden mittels einer Dokumentenanalyse erfasst.

Ergebnisse

Die teilnehmenden und interessierten Kommunen weisen höhere Einwohnerzahlen und geringere Deprivationswerte als der Durchschnitt der Kommunen in Bayern auf und stellen mehr Angebote der Gesundheitsförderung bereit als deprivierte Vergleichskommunen. Großen Einfluss auf die Teilnahme an den Projekten haben finanzielle Faktoren, politische Unterstützung und engagierte Personen.

Diskussion

Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie deuten auf ein Präventionsdilemma auf kommunaler Ebene hin. Um gesundheitlichen Ungleichheiten zwischen Kommunen vorzubeugen, sollten benachteiligte Kommunen in die Gestaltung von Förderprogrammen einbezogen werden, um diese Programme an deren Bedürfnisse anzupassen.

Scaling Up Physical Activity Promotion Projects on the Community Level for Women in Difficult Life Situations and Older People: BIG-5 and GET-10—A Study Protocol

Introduction

Physical inactivity is a major risk factor for a population's health, especially among socially disadvantaged groups. Many health promotion projects focus on increasing physical activity among their respective target groups. However, because they are mostly developed and implemented under laboratory conditions, they fail when being scaled to real-world settings. The community-based participatory research projects BIG and GESTALT have demonstrated their effectiveness regarding the physical activity promotion in real-world settings by employing a participatory method.

Material and Analysis

Within the context of the BIG-5 and GET-10 projects, these previously implemented and tested participatory projects are scaled to 15 additional settings in Bavaria, Germany. By applying an overarching mixed-methods evaluation framework, the aim is to gain insights into a) the recruitment of communities for scale-up; b) the specific results of the projects according to the RE-AIM framework. In the recruitment of communities, standardized information on the first contact, the consultation process, the person in charge, and previously implemented health promotion projects are collected. A systematic web search will complete information on each community and their health promotion activities. Results will be compared with information on those communities most in need, here according to the deprivation index of communities in Bavaria, Germany. The scale-up process and its results will be measured using semi-structured interviews with project coordinators. A standardized questionnaire will be used with the course's participants. Applying the RE-AIM framework, the collected data will be analyzed deductively.

Discussion

We expect the results to be highly relevant for the effective scale-up of any health promotion project. The study will enhance the understanding of how to reach those communities most in need of health promotion projects and will identify the barriers coordinators face in reaching socially disadvantaged groups.

Conclusion

Although participatory projects are often used as individual projects, little is known about the scaling up of participatory health promotion projects. This cross-cutting evaluation of two projects aims at producing data on the barriers and facilitators for the reach of settings most in need, and those success factors for a durable implementation.

Monitoring of physical activity promotion in children and adolescents in the EU: current status and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Policy action is required to address physical inactivity in boys and girls. This action can be supported by international data collection, comparisons and sharing of good practices. Thus, this study aims to present and discuss the ongoing monitoring of physical activity (PA) indicators in children and adolescents in the 28 EU Member States.

METHODS

Data on PA recommendations, PA prevalence, physical education (PE) and PA promotion programs for children and adolescents were provided by governments in a joint EU/WHO survey on the implementation status of the EU Council Recommendation on Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) across Sectors.

RESULTS

In 23 countries, national recommendations on PA are available. Detailed PA prevalence data among children and adolescents was available in 27 countries, in most cases separately for sex/gender and age groups. The total amount of PE lessons in schools differed greatly between countries and lessons were predominantly mandatory. After-school HEPA promotion programs were mostly implemented in EU Member States (78.6%), followed by active school breaks (57.1%), active travel to school (57.1%) and active breaks during school lessons (53.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study summarizes the monitoring of PA indicators among children and adolescents in all EU Member States by providing a comprehensive overview of the status of PA promotion and monitoring across the region. Based on our findings, it could be concluded that the current EU monitoring system on PA promotion should be adapted to provide evidence that can inform future policy development.

[Policies to promote physical activity in Germany : An analysis based on a policy audit tool from the World Health Organization]

BACKGROUND

Physical inactivity is a key determinant of noncommunicable diseases. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as researchers worldwide have developed different tools to monitor and audit policies to promote physical activity. However, these tools have so far not been used to systematically collect and analyse data on physical activity promoting policies in Germany.

AIM

This study aims to provide a systematic overview of policies to promote physical activity in Germany.

METHODS

The study was conducted as part of the Policy Evaluation Network ( www.jpi-pen.eu ). Data from the European Union Physical Activity Monitoring Framework, desk research, and an expert survey were utilised and collected with the WHO's health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) policy audit tool (PAT).

RESULTS

The results highlight the wide range of relevant stakeholders and provide an overview of current policies as well as surveillance, evaluation, and funding. Significant accomplishments and persistent challenges are identified.

DISCUSSION

An international comparison shows that, in contrast to Germany, other countries have formulated measurable goals for physical activity promotion on a national level. However, Germany is among a minority of countries with specific physical activity recommendations for adults with noncommunicable diseases. Further structural development of physical activity promotion in Germany is necessary.

Co-producing an action-oriented framework for community-based Physical Activity Promotion in Germany

German National Recommendations for Physical Activity (PA) and PA Promotion recommend community-based approaches to promote PA at the local level with a focus on health equity. In addition, the German Federal Prevention Act addresses health equity and strengthens setting-based health promotion in communities. However, the implementation of both in the local context remains a challenge. This article describes Phase 1 of the KOMBINE project that aims to co-produce an action-oriented framework for community-based PA promotion focusing on structural change and health equity. (i) In a series of workshops, key stakeholders and researchers discussed facilitators, barriers and needs of community-based PA promotion focusing on health equity. (ii) The research team used an inductive approach to cluster all findings and to identify key components and then (iii) compared the key components with updated literature. (iv) Key components were discussed and incorporated into a gradually co-produced framework by the participants. The first result of the co-production process was a catalog of nine key components regarding PA-related health promotion in German communities. The comparison of key components with scientific evidence showed a high overlap. Finally, a six-phase action-oriented framework including key components for community-based PA promotion was co-produced. The six-phase action-oriented framework integrates practice-based and scientific evidence on PA-related health promotion and health equity. It represents a shared vision for the implementation of National Recommendations for PA and PA Promotion in Germany. The extent to which structural changes and health equity can be achieved is currently being investigated in pilot-studies.

Coproduction to improve preventive health services-experiences from Germany

Due to the beneficial impact of regular physical activity (PA) on non-communicable diseases, the number of countries integrating exercise referral schemes (ERSs) into their healthcare systems is growing. Owing to the limitations of existing PA promotion concepts in Germany’s healthcare system, efforts are currently being made towards developing a nationwide referral pathway. A research group at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg is coordinating these efforts within a project funded by the Federal Ministry of Health. The aim is to develop, implement and evaluate a regional-level ERS that has the potential to be scaled up across Germany in the event of its demonstrated effectiveness. The project is based on an adapted Cooperative Planning approach requiring interaction between the academic sector and different actors of the healthcare sector. The present commentary reflects on challenges faced in the early stages of the co-production process. Besides the development of an adequate co-production methodology, it critically discusses stakeholder participation, knowledge gaps and actors’ willingness to take responsibility. In addition, although patients are represented by dedicated organizations, their perspective cannot be adequately captured using a co-production approach. Despite the joint development of an ERS, there remain important questions regarding the appropriateness of the co-production approach in a healthcare setting.

Regular physical activity (PA) reduces one’s risk of developing various diseases and also plays a favourable role in managing symptoms and preventing further complications. Nationally and internationally, there exist different concepts on how to increase PA in the population at large. The Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg is currently working on a project that focuses on promoting PA in primary care. This project involves collaboration among various actors in the German healthcare system, such as healthcare insurances, representatives of physicians, patients and exercise specialists, who represent different interests and are experts in their fields of knowledge. During this process, various barriers have come to light, which yield important lessons for further studies. For example, there are differences in actors’ levels of knowledge of the healthcare system and their willingness to take responsibility and initiative in the collaborative process. This article should give an impression of the joint development of exercise referral schemes, show the strengths and weaknesses and encourage exchanges of similar experiences of co-production processes.

Toward the economic evaluation of participatory approaches in health promotion: lessons from four German physical activity promotion projects

Health promotion increasingly employs participatory approaches, but the question arises whether the likely higher costs of participation also translate into greater benefits. This article takes a first step toward a full health economic evaluation by comprehensively reporting the costs of a specific participatory approach, Cooperative Planning, in a German research consortium to promote physical activity. We conducted a costing analysis of Cooperative Planning at 22 sites across six settings. Project teams used a custom template to record resource use. We calculated average costs per meeting, site and setting using the opportunity costs approach, and obtained feedback from participating researchers. A total of 144 planning meetings with an average of nine participants were conducted. Costs per meeting varied significantly across settings. Differences were mostly attributable to varying meeting duration, preparation time and numbers of participants. Across settings, human resources accounted for roughly 95% of the costs. Implementing researchers reported challenges regarding the logic and methods of the health economic analysis. A participatory approach to physical activity promotion may cause substantially varying costs in different settings despite similar cost structures. However, their value for money could turn out comparably favorable if (and only if) the expected benefits is indeed forthcoming. Despite some challenges implementing the costing exercise into the logistics of ongoing participatory projects, this analysis may pave the way toward a full health economic evaluation, and the template may be useful to future participatory health promotion projects.

Barriers and Facilitators of Physical Activity Participation in Adolescent Girls: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

Background: Persistent low physical activity (PA) levels among adolescent girls constitute a public health concern that calls for immediate and evidence-based policy action. This systematic review (SR) aimed to summarize evidence from SRs examining the barriers and facilitators of PA participation in adolescent girls. The objectives were to provide a synthesis of the available evidence and identify key areas for fostering gender-responsive action and policy implications. Methods: A comprehensive search of relevant SR and meta-analyses were performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library, until February 2021. Studies were included if they were SRs or meta-analyses, included adolescent girls aged between 10 and 19 years, and described barriers or facilitators of PA. Two independent authors performed the screening of potentially eligible studies and both assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The barriers and facilitators were synthesized at environmental, interpersonal, and individual levels. Results: A total of eight SRs were included in the qualitative synthesis. The most frequent barriers identified were the lack of support from peers, family, and teachers, and the lack of time. The most reported facilitators were weight loss, and support from peers, family, and teachers. Key areas for action and policy implementation include an inclusive approach to curriculum development to address gender norms; adequate training of professionals so they have a range of skills to ensure inclusion of adolescent girls; environmental changes in and out of schools to stimulate participation, to allow adolescent girls to be active in a safe and attractive environment; multistakeholder support at local, regional, and national level in incorporating a gender-responsive approach toward PA participation. Conclusion: The results highlight a variety of factors that influences the PA participation of adolescent girls. For the attainment of effective policies that increase PA levels in adolescent girls, it is essential to engage several stakeholders at different levels in incorporating a gender-responsive approach toward PA participation. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020204023.

Impact of the First Wave of COVID-19 on Physical Activity Promotion in the European Union: Results From a Policymaker Survey

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic is a major challenge for societies and governments around the world that severely affects all aspects of health promotion. This study assesses the potential influence of the first wave of the pandemic on national physical activity promotion policy in the European Union (EU).

METHODS

Data were collected using an online survey among members of the EU Physical Activity Focal Point Network, which consists of government officials from all EU member states.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected physical activity promotion across the EU. In particular, experts indicated that it has negatively impacted opportunities for physical activity in their countries. There have, however, been positive effects of the crisis on public awareness of physical activity. While almost all countries were able to issue physical activity recommendations during quarantine, opinions varied regarding the overall impact of the pandemic on governmental capacities for physical activity promotion and policy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the COVID-19 crisis has had both negative and positive effects on physical activity promotion in the EU. The positive experiences reported by some members of the Focal Point Network may assist other countries in identifying potential policy windows and strategies for the ongoing pandemic.

Physical inactivity in nine European and Central Asian countries: an analysis of national population-based survey results

Background

Physical inactivity is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases. However, recent and systematically obtained national-level data to guide policy responses are often lacking, especially in countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. This article describes physical inactivity patterns among adults in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkey and Uzbekistan.

Methods

Data were collected using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire drawing nationally representative samples of adults in each country. The national prevalence of physical inactivity was calculated as well as the proportional contribution to total physical activity (PA) during work, transport and leisure-time. An adjusted logistic regression model was applied to analyze the association of age, gender, education, household status and income with physical inactivity.

Results

National prevalence of physical inactivity ranged from 10.1% to 43.6%. The highest proportion of PA was registered during work or in the household in most countries, whereas the lowest was during leisure-time in all countries. Physical inactivity was more likely with older age in eight countries, with female gender in three countries, and with living alone in three countries. There was no clear pattern of association with education and income.

Conclusion

Prevalence of physical inactivity is heterogeneous across the region. PA during leisure-time contributes minimally to total PA in all countries. Policies and programs that increase opportunities for active travel and leisure-time PA, especially for older adults, women and people living alone will be an essential part of strategies to increase overall population PA.

[Dissemination of National Physical Activity Recommendations: Participatory Development of Dissemination Strategies in Germany]

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the first evidence-based National Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion were published in Germany. These recommendations are primarily intended for experts, decision makers and stakeholders.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe the development of dissemination strategies for these recommendations.

PROCESS

To facilitate the co-production of knowledge between practitioners, decision makers, and researchers, a participatory approach was applied. This approach involved the development of target group-specific strategies for disseminating the recommendations. This was achieved in two workshops and one working group phase; 92 professionals and decision makers participated in the process.

RESULTS

The working groups developed specific dissemination strategies that were grouped into the following strategy types: (1) inform multipliers, (2) activate multipliers, (3) use existing and develop new networks, (4) initiate policy change.

CONCLUSION

The participatory approach adopted in this project was successful in developing dissemination strategies and is unique from an international perspective. To improve the evaluation of such co-production processes, future research should determine and operationalize appropriate indicators.

Scaling Up a Community-Based Exercise Program for Women in Difficult Life Situations in Germany-The BIG Project as a Case-Study

Scaling up community-based participatory research (CBPR) remains challenging. This case-study reports on how, and under which conditions, a CBPR project aiming at promoting exercise among socially disadvantaged women (BIG) scaled up at four project sites. As part of BIG, researchers support city administrations in implementing a participatory project to reach socially disadvantaged women for exercise. The case study was conducted in winter 2020 in southern Germany and is based on a co-creative process involving city administrators and researchers. Following Kohl and Cooley's scaling up dimensions, scaling up BIG was investigated at the four sites using a mixed-method approach. Course registrations and offers were analysed, and qualitative interviews (n = 4) with administrative staff members were conducted and analysed using content analysis. The geographical coverage of exercise classes, the addressed groups, and the utilisation of participatory methods by city administrations are described. All four sites managed to scale-up project activities. Three of the four sites reported that further growth of the project was no longer possible due to limited resources. All sites attempted to reach a larger number of, and more diverse, women. One site managed to scale-up the use of participatory methods within the city administration. The following important facilitators for scaling up CBPR projects were reported: advertisements tailored to the needs of the addressed women, utilising participatory approaches, and equipping project coordinators with sufficient resources.

Physical activity referral scheme components: a study protocol for systematic review and meta-regression

INTRODUCTION

In its attempt to establish effective physical activity promotion methods, research on physical activity referral schemes (PARS) is attracting significant attention. Sometimes known as physical activity on prescription schemes, PARS involve a well-defined procedure whereby a primary healthcare professional introduces a participant to the topic of physical activity and employs prescription or referral forms to connect the participant to physical activity opportunities, such as local fitness offers. The planned systematic review will focus on these referral routes and scheme components and how they are integrated into various PARS models worldwide. We seek to identify the evidence-based core components that play the most important roles in the effectiveness of PARS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The development and reporting of the protocol follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. We plan to conduct a systematic main literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, HTA, SpringerLink and other databases. We will include studies that report outcomes on physical activity, PARS uptake and adherence rates or descriptive information about PARS models. We intend for all review stages, citation screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment to be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. As a broad spectrum of study designs, including randomised and non-randomised studies of interventions and mixed methods, will be eligible, we will use three separate tools to assess the risk of bias in individual studies. The data will be primarily synthesised narratively, following Intervention Component Analysis. If the data allow, we will perform a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the impact of specific PARS components on effect sizes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and international conferences to reach the scientific community.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021233229.

Scientific Cooperation and the Co-production of Scientific Outcomes for Physical Activity Promotion: Results From a Transdisciplinary Research Consortium

Background: To tackle complex societal challenges such as the high prevalence of physical inactivity, research funding is increasingly channeled toward cross-disciplinary research consortia. This study focused on exchange and cooperation (E&C) among the scientists of a 5-year transdisciplinary research initiative in Germany. Researchers' perceptions of E&C were combined with numbers of collaborative products during the project's life to make the developments of E&C and the quality of collaborative products visible.

Methods: We applied a mixed-methods design including a qualitative content analysis of pre-interviews, focus-group interviews, and documents as well as a quantitative analysis of research (scientific publications, books, conference participations) and training outcomes (supervised bachelor's, master's, and Ph.D. theses). Inductive and deductive approaches were combined to analyze factors of collaborative readiness and to identify perceptions of E&C among project teams. Based on Hall et al.'s “Conceptual Model for Evaluation of Collaborative Initiatives,” the project period was separated into phases of “collaborative readiness,” “collaborative capacity,” and “collaborative products.”

Results: Our findings revealed a discrepancy between the objectively assessed concepts of collaborative readiness and researchers' reported perceptions of E&C during the early project stage. A set of E&C hindering factors identified during the initial project phase remained present until the final project stage. Further, E&C among scientists increased over time, as reflected by researchers' perceptions. Reports of scientists also showed that outcomes were co-produced at the final project stage for the first time, while knowledge integration had not yet been achieved. Generally, the number of collaborative products (particularly scientific publications) also substantially increased over time. E&C was supported and promoted by the efforts of the coordinating sub-project.

Conclusion: Scientific E&C is a learning process and needs time to develop. A participatory research approach taking into account the perspectives on and requirements for E&C during the project's design might lay the ground for suitable, supportive, and transparent conditions for effective and successful E&C. Despite their time- and resource-consuming nature, cross-disciplinary research initiatives provide a fertile context in which to generate new solutions for pressing societal issues given that long-term funding and the establishment of an overarching coordination organ is assured.

Promoting health-enhancing physical activity in Europe: Surveillance, policy development and implementation 2015-2018

•

Study of trends in physical activity policy development in Europe.

•

National physical activity policy development has advanced.

•

Increased national policy actions in the health and education sectors.

•

Monitoring and surveillance has expanded but needs to be standardised.

In the European Union (EU), the low levels of health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) and high levels of sedentary behaviour are a concerning public health issue common to all Member States. In 2013, the Council of the EU recognized the need for more data related to HEPA to support policymaking across the region and proposed a monitoring framework that included 23 indicators covering different themes relevant to HEPA promotion in the EU context. In 2014, the EU Physical Activity Focal Points Network was established to support the implementation of the monitoring framework and in 2015 and 2018 surveys were conducted to collect epidemiological and policy information related to HEPA for each Member State. This paper aims to provide an update on the status of HEPA policies and surveillance in the EU and describe the changes that have occurred since 2015. In 2018, all countries had implemented more than 10 indicators, 8/28 had implemented 20 or more indicators, and only one country had completed all 23 indicators. From 2015 to 2018, 19 indicators improved, one remained unchanged, and three regressed. From the country perspective, 17 improved the number of accomplished indicators, five maintained the indicators, and five worsened the number of indicators. Overall, there has been a clear increase in the number of countries implementing HEPA policies and strategies across the different sectors, although some heterogeneity between Members Sates was still observed. Implementation of regional physical activity strategies and the establishment of the EU-wide monitoring framework appears to have had an overall positive impact on HEPA policy development and implementation.

Development of national physical activity recommendations in 18 EU member states: a comparison of methodologies and the use of evidence

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to compare how member states of the European Union (EU) develop their national physical activity (PA) recommendations and to provide an overview of the methodologies they apply in doing so. Information was collected directly from the physical activity focal points of EU member states in 2018. Five countries were chosen for detailed case study analysis of development processes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

The representatives of the 28 EU member state governments to the EU physical activity Focal Point Network.

OUTCOME MEASURES

From national documents we extracted data on (1) the participants of the development process, (2) the different methods used during development, and (3) on which sources national PA recommendations were based. An additional survey for case study countries provided details on (1) anonymised information on the participants of development process, (2) methods employed and rationale for choosing them, (3) development process and timeline, and (4) main source documents used for recommendation development.

RESULTS

Eighteen national documents on PA recommendations contained information about development process. The results showed that countries used different approaches to develop national recommendations. The main strategies were (1) adoption of WHO 2010 recommendations or (2) a combination of analysis and adoption of other national and international recommendations and literature review. All of the five case study countries relied on review processes rather than directly adopting WHO recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are arguments for the use of particular strategies for PA recommendation development, there is currently no evidence for the general superiority of a specific approach. Instead, our findings highlight the broad spectrum of potential development methods, resources utilisation and final recommendations design currently available to national governments. These results may be a source of inspiration for other countries currently planning the development or update of national PA recommendations.