A Comprehensive Resiliency Framework: Theoretical Model, Treatment, and Evaluation

BACKGROUND

There is heterogeneity in conceptualizations of resiliency, and there is, to date, no established theoretically driven resiliency assessment measure that aligns with a targeted resiliency intervention. We operationalize resiliency as one's ability to maintain adaptive functioning in response to the ongoing, chronic stress of daily living, and we use a novel resiliency measure that assesses the target components of an evidence based resiliency intervention. We present our resiliency theory, treatment model, and corresponding assessment measure (Current Experience Scale; CES).

METHODS

To establish the psychometric properties of the CES, we report the factor structure and internal consistency reliability (N = 273). Among participants in our resiliency intervention (N = 151), we explored construct validity in terms of associations with theoretical model constructs, a validated resiliency measure, and sensitivity to change from before to after the intervention.

RESULTS

Results indicated that a 23-item, 6-factor solution was a good fit to the data (RMSEA = .08, CFI = .97; TLI =.96) and internal consistency was good (α = .81 to .95). The CES showed correlations in the expected direction with resiliency model constructs (all p's < .001) and significant post intervention improvements.

CONCLUSION

Our resiliency theory, treatment model, and outcome appear aligned; the CES demonstrated promise as a psychometrically sound outcome measure for our resiliency intervention and may be used in future longitudinal studies and resiliency building interventions to assess individuals' resiliency to adapt to ongoing stress.

Sharing and caring: The impact of social support on quality of life and health outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Social support is crucial for successful recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and has the potential to affect patient quality of life (QOL) and health outcomes. However, there are limited data on the relationship between a patient's perception of his or her social support and these outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a secondary analysis of 250 autologous and allogeneic HSCT recipients enrolled in 2 supportive care trials at Massachusetts General Hospital from April 2011 through February 2016. They assessed social support as a patient's perception of his or her social well-being via the social well-being subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. The authors used multivariate regression analyses to examine the relationship between pretransplant social well-being and QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Treatment Outcome Index), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms (PTSD Checklist), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue), and health care utilization (hospitalizations and days alive and out of the hospital) 6 months after HSCT.

RESULTS

Participants were on average 56.4 years old (SD, 13.3 years); 44% (n = 110) and 56% (n = 140) received autologous and allogeneic HSCT, respectively. Greater pre-HSCT social well-being was associated with higher QOL (B = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.13; P < .001), lower psychological distress (B = -0.21; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.12; P < .001), and lower PTSD symptoms (B = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.06; P < .001). Pre-HSCT social well-being was not significantly associated with fatigue or health care utilization 6 months after HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher pre-HSCT perceptions of their social support reported better QOL and lower psychological distress 6 months after HSCT. These findings underscore the potential for social support as a modifiable target for future supportive care interventions to improve the QOL and care of HSCT recipients.

Anxiety Disorders

The focus of this chapter is on the clinical manifestation of anxiety disorders in patients diagnosed with cancer. We review the prevalence and correlates, presenting characteristics, assessment methods and recommendations, and evidence-based pharmacologic and psychosocial treatments of anxiety in this population. Cancer-related considerations that may impact care and treatment planning are highlighted. Close collaboration between oncology and mental health clinicians as well as between the patient and their multidisciplinary team is essential for developing a patient-centered approach for managing anxiety, improving quality of life, and supporting participation in cancer care. The chapter concludes with discussion of key directions for future research on anxiety disorders in the oncology setting.

Enhanced coping and self-efficacy in caregivers of stem cell transplant recipients: Identifying mechanisms of a multimodal psychosocial intervention

BACKGROUND

In a recent trial, a 6-session intervention (BMT-CARE) integrating medical information with cognitive-behavioral strategies improved quality of life (QOL), mood, coping skills, and self-efficacy for family/friend caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. This study examined whether improvements in coping and self-efficacy mediated the intervention effects on QOL and mood.

METHODS

From December 2017 to April 2019, 100 caregivers of HCT recipients were enrolled into a randomized clinical trial of BMT-CARE versus usual care. Caregivers completed self-report measures of QOL (CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire), depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping skills (Measure of Current Status), and self-efficacy (Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale-Transplant) at enrollment (before HCT) and 60 days after HCT. Causal mediation regression models were used to examine whether changes in coping and self-efficacy mediated intervention effects on QOL as well as depression and anxiety symptoms.

RESULTS

Improvements in 60-day QOL in patients assigned to BMT-CARE were partially mediated by improved coping and self-efficacy (indirect effect, 6.93; SE, 1.85; 95% CI, 3.71-11.05). Similarly, reductions in 60-day depression and anxiety symptoms were partially mediated by improved coping and self-efficacy (indirect effect for depression, -1.19; SE, 0.42; 95% CI, -2.23 to -0.53; indirect effect for anxiety, -1.46; SE, 0.55; 95% CI, -2.52 to -0.43). Combined improvements in coping and self-efficacy accounted for 67%, 80%, and 39% of the total intervention effects on QOL and depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Coping and self-efficacy are essential components of a brief psychosocial intervention that improves QOL and mood for caregivers of HCT recipients during the acute recovery period.

LAY SUMMARY

A 6-session program (BMT-CARE) focused on providing medical information, caregiving skills, and self-care and coping strategies has been previously reported to improve the quality of life and mood of caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients in comparison with caregivers who receive care as usual. Using statistical models, this study suggests that learning coping skills and improving self-efficacy are the most essential components of this program that likely lead to better quality of life and mood for caregivers.

HFE and ALK3 act in the same signaling pathway

Hepcidin deficiency leads to iron overload by increased dietary iron uptake and iron release from storage cells. The most frequent mutation in Hfe leads to reduced hepcidin expression and thereby causes iron overload. Recent findings suggested that HFE activates hepcidin expression predominantly via the BMP type I receptor ALK3. Here, we investigated whether HFE exclusively utilizes ALK3 or other signaling mechanisms also. We generated mice with double deficiency of Hfe and hepatocyte-specific Alk3 and compared the iron overload phenotypes of these double knockout mice to single hepatocyte-specific Alk3 deficient or Hfe knockout mice. Double Hfe^-/-/hepatic Alk3^fl/fl;Alb-Cre knockouts develop a similar iron overload phenotype compared to single hepatocyte-specific Alk3 deficient mice hallmarked by serum iron levels, tissue iron content and hepcidin levels of similar grades. HFE protein levels were increased in Alk3^fl/fl;Alb-Cre mice compared to Alk3^fl/fl mice, which was caused by iron overload - and not by Alk3 deficiency. The data provide evidence by genetic means that 1. HFE exclusively uses the BMP type I receptor ALK3 to induce hepcidin expression and 2. HFE protein expression is induced by iron overload, which further emphasizes the iron sensing function of HFE.

The Experience of Emergency Department Providers With Embedded Palliative Care During COVID

CONTEXT

Although the importance of palliative care (PC) integration in the emergency department (ED) has long been recognized, few formalized programs have been reported, and none have evaluated the experience of ED clinicians with embedded PC.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the experience of ED clinicians with embedded PC in the ED during the coronavirus disease pandemic.

METHODS

ED clinicians completed a survey about their perceptions of embedded PC in the ED. We summarized responses to closed-ended items using descriptive statistics and analyzed open-ended items using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

There were 134 ED clinicians surveyed. About 101 replied (75% response rate). Of those who had interacted with PC, 100% indicated a benefit of having PC involved. These included freeing up ED clinicians for other tasks (89%), helping them feel more supported (84%), changing the patients care trajectory (67%), and contributing to clinician education (57%) and skills (49%). Among barriers related to engaging PC were difficulty locating them (8%) and lack of time to consult because of ED volume (5%). About 98% of respondents felt that having PC in the ED was either valuable or very valuable. Open-ended responses reflected a positive impact on clinician wellness and improvement in access to high-quality goal-concordant care. Clinicians expressed gratitude for having PC in the ED and noted the importance of having readily available and easily accessible PC in the ED.

CONCLUSION

ED clinicians' perception of embedded PC was overall positive, with an emphasis on the impact related to task management, enrichment of PC skills, providing support for the team, and improved care for ED patients.

A Virtual Resiliency Intervention for Parents of Children with Autism: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Parents of children with Autism experience high levels of stress. Resiliency is the ability to cope and adapt when faced with stressful events. This randomized, waitlist controlled pilot trial examines the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an adapted virtual mind-body group intervention for parents of children with ASD. The intervention was feasible and acceptable. The immediate treatment group showed no difference in distress and greater improvement in resiliency and stress reactivity/coping relative to the delayed treatment group, (M difference 5.78; p = .038 and M difference 7.78; p = .001 respectively). Findings showed promising feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy for parents of children with ASD.

Communicating the components of informed treatment decision-making in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving preoperative therapy

147

Background: Preoperative therapy for localized pancreatic cancer represents an emerging treatment paradigm with the potential to provide significant benefits, yet with complex risks. Research is lacking about whether clinicians effectively communicate key components of informed decision-making for patients considering this treatment. Methods: From 2017-2019, we conducted a two-part, mixed methods study. In part 1, we conducted interviews with clinicians (medical/radiation/surgical oncology, n = 13) and patients with pancreatic cancer who had received preoperative therapy (n = 18) to explore perceptions of information needed to make informed decisions about preoperative therapy, from which we generated a list of key elements. In part 2, we audio recorded the initial multidisciplinary visits of patients with pancreatic cancer eligible for preoperative therapy (n = 20). Two coders (94% concordance) independently identified whether clinicians discussed key elements from part 1. Patients also completed a post-visit survey reporting whether clinicians discussed the key elements. We explored discordance between audio recordings and patient reports using qualitative, explanatory themes. Results: In part 1, we identified 13 key elements of informed treatment decision-making, including treatment logistics, alternatives, and potential risks/benefits. In part 2, recordings showed that most visits included discussions about logistics, such as the chemotherapy schedule (n = 20) and use of a port-a-cath (n = 20), whereas few included discussions about risks, such as the potential for hospitalizations (n = 7), urgent visits (n = 6), or needing help with daily tasks (n = 6). Patients reported hearing about potential benefits, such as likelihood of achieving surgery (n = 10) and cure (n = 7), even when these were not discussed. Qualitative themes across these discordant cases included clinician optimism regarding present day results versus historical findings and mentions of positive outcomes from prior patients without citing specific data or potential adverse outcomes. Conclusions: We identified key elements of information patients with pancreatic cancer need to make informed decisions about preoperative therapy. Although clinicians frequently disclosed much of this information, we found multiple cases of patient-clinician discordance for certain key elements, which underscores the need for interventions to enhance patient-clinician communication regarding pancreatic cancer treatment decisions.

Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Palliative Care in End-Stage Liver Disease

Background: Specialty palliative care (PC) is underutilized for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD); however, studies exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of PC are lacking. Objectives: To explore patient and caregiver knowledge, perceptions, and preferences about PC in ESLD management. Setting/Subjects: Individuals with ESLD and their informal caregivers were recruited from a large academic medical center in the United States. Design: We conducted semistructured interviews with 15 patients with ESLD and 14 informal caregivers. Purposive sampling was used to balance both transplant-listed and transplant-ineligible patients. We used a brief description of PC to explore participants' knowledge, perceptions, and preferences about PC. Two raters coded interviews independently (κ = 0.95) using template analysis. Results: Participants' knowledge about PC came primarily from their loved ones' experiences with PC, with many conflating PC with end-of-life care. Transplant-listed patients expressed concern that a PC referral would negatively impact their likelihood of receiving a liver transplant. After hearing a brief description of PC, nearly all participants believed that patients with ESLD should learn about PC soon after diagnosis to help support their illness understanding and coping. Conclusions: Study participants reported limited knowledge of PC and often perceived it as hospice care. After receiving education on PC, nearly all participants, regardless of transplant eligibility, advocated for early introduction of PC in ESLD care. Interventions are needed to educate patients with ESLD and their caregivers on the potential role of PC to overcome misperceptions of PC and allow earlier integration of PC into ESLD management.

Randomized trial of a hospice video educational tool for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers have substantial misperceptions regarding hospice, which contributes to its underuse.

METHODS

The authors conducted a single-site randomized trial of a video educational tool versus a verbal description of hospice in 150 hospitalized patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients without a caregiver were eligible. Intervention participants (75 patients and 18 caregivers) viewed a 6-minute video depicting hospice. Control participants (75 patients and 26 caregivers) received a verbal description identical to the video narrative. The primary outcome was patient preference for hospice. Secondary outcomes included patient and/or caregiver knowledge and perceptions of hospice, and hospice use.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and January 2019, approximately 55.7% of eligible patients (150 of 269 eligible patients) and 44 caregivers were enrolled. After the intervention, there was no difference noted with regard to patients' preferences for hospice (86.7% vs 82.7%; P = .651). Patients in the video group reported greater knowledge regarding hospice (9.0 vs 8.4; P = .049) and were less likely to endorse that hospice is only about death (6.7% vs 21.6%; P = .010). Among deceased patients, those assigned to the intervention were more likely to have used hospice (85.2% vs 63.6%; P = .01) and to have had a longer hospice length of stay (median, 12 days vs 3 days; P < .001). After the intervention, caregivers assigned to view the video were more likely to prefer hospice for their loved ones (94.4% vs 65.4%; P = .031), reported greater knowledge concerning hospice (9.7% vs 8.0%; P = .001), and were less likely to endorse that hospice is only about death (0.0% vs 23.1%; P = .066).

CONCLUSIONS

A hospice video did not significantly impact patients' preferences for hospice care. Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers who were assigned to view the video were more informed regarding hospice and reported more favorable perceptions of hospice. Patients were more likely to use hospice and to have a longer hospice length of stay.

Relationship Between Perceptions of Treatment Goals and Psychological Distress in Patients With Advanced Cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown gaps in prognostic understanding among patients with cancer. However, few studies have explored patients' perceptions of their treatment goals versus how they perceive their oncologist's goals, and the association of these views with their psychological distress.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 559 patients with incurable lung, gastrointestinal, breast, and brain cancers. The Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire was used to assess patients' reports of their treatment goal and their oncologist's treatment goal, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess patients' psychological symptoms.

RESULTS

We found that 61.7% of patients reported that both their treatment goal and their oncologist's treatment goal were noncurative, whereas 19.3% reported that both their goal and their oncologist's goal were to cure their cancer, 13.9% reported that their goal was to cure their cancer whereas their oncologist's goal was noncurative, and 5% reported that their goal was noncurative whereas their oncologist's goal was curative. Patients who reported both their goal and their oncologist's goal as noncurative had higher levels of depression (B=0.99; P=.021) and anxiety symptoms (B=1.01; P=.015) compared with those who reported that both their goal and their oncologist's goal was curative. Patients with discordant perceptions of their goal and their oncologist's goal reported higher anxiety symptoms (B=1.47; P=.004) compared with those who reported that both their goal and their oncologist's goal were curative.

CONCLUSIONS

One-fifth of patients with incurable cancer reported that both their treatment goal and their oncologist's goal were to cure their cancer. Patients who acknowledged the noncurative intent of their treatment and those who perceived that their treatment goal was discordant from that of their oncologist reported greater psychological distress.

Resilience and cognitive symptoms in cancer: An exploratory study

e24079

Background: One of the most common concerns of cancer survivors is cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), which affects an individual’s ability to return to work, school, or other life activities. The etiology of CRCI is poorly understood. Numerous studies have demonstrated a relationship between emotional distress and cognitive dysfunction, though the core psychological construct underlying this relationship has been elusive. Resilience, defined as the ability to function well despite adversity, reflects individual capacity to manage stress and reduce allostatic load. We hypothesized that low resilience contributes to stress-related cognitive symptoms in cancer survivors, and that improvement in resilience through the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP), a psychotherapy group that reduces emotional distress, would reduce cognitive symptoms in cancer survivors. Methods: Consistent with prior protocols, adult cancer survivors participated in the 3RP program, a 9-week resiliency mind-body group treatment led by psychologists and/or psychiatrists. Survivors completed measures of cognitive symptoms (Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System – Cognitive function; PROMIS-Cog) and resilience (Current Experiences Scale; CES) before and after treatment. Pearson correlations evaluated relationships between resilience and cognition. Results: 46 cancer survivors (mean age = 57, 85% female, 94% White, 4% Asian, 2% Black) completed \ CES and PROMIS-Cog at therapy intake, with 41% of subjects reporting significant cognitive impairment at baseline (defined as scores of < 1.0 SD on PROMIS-Cog). There was a significant correlation between these two scales prior to treatment (r = 0.33; p = 0.025), indicating that subjects with lower resilience reported poorer cognition. Thus far, 13 survivors have completed the 8-week therapy program, with 46% of these patients reporting significant cognitive difficulties. The post-treatment correlation between resilience and cognition was nonsignificant (r = 0.19;p = ns). Treatment effects were operationalized by change scores (follow up – baseline) for CES and PROMIS-Cog. The relationship between CES and PROMIS-Cog change scores was positive but not significant with the small sample size (r = 0.35; p = 0.028). Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests that there is a relationship between resilience and cognition in cancer survivors. Improvements in resilience through the 3RP treatment may reduce cognitive symptoms, though further work is needed to determine the significance of this effect.

Enhanced coping and self-efficacy in caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients: Identifying mechanisms of a multimodal psychosocial intervention

12122

Background: A brief multimodal psychosocial intervention (BMT-CARE) for caregivers of HCT recipients demonstrated promising efficacy for improving caregiver quality of life (QOL), mood, coping skills, and self-efficacy. We examined whether improvements in coping and self-efficacy mediated the intervention effects on QOL and mood. Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial of BMT-CARE for caregivers of patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic HCT at a single institution. Caregivers were randomly assigned to BMT-CARE or usual care. BMT-CARE was tailored to the HCT trajectory and integrated treatment-related education and self-care with cognitive-behavioral skills and caregiving-specific strategies to promote coping. Caregivers completed self-report measures of QOL (CareGiver Oncology QOL), depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), coping skills (Measure of Current Status), and self-efficacy (Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale-Transplant) at enrollment and 60 days post-HCT. We used causal mediation regression models to examine whether changes in coping and self-efficacy mediated intervention effects on QOL, depression and anxiety symptoms. Results: Caregivers randomized to BMT-CARE reported improved self-efficacy (adjusted means: 156.20 vs. 147.06, P=0.023) and coping skills (adjusted means: 36.54 vs. 25.41, P<0.001). Improved coping and self-efficacy partially mediated the intervention effects on 60-day QOL (indirect effect=6.93, SE=1.85, 95% CI [3.71, 11.05]). Similarly, improved coping and self-efficacy partially mediated reductions in 60-day depression and anxiety symptoms (indirect effect depression=-1.19, SE=0.42, 95% CI [-2.23, -0.53]; indirect effect anxiety=-1.46, SE=0.55, 95% CI [-2.52, -0.43]). Combined improvements in coping and self-efficacy accounted for 67%, 80%, and 39% of the total intervention effect on QOL and depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Conclusions: A brief multimodal intervention for caregivers of HCT recipients may improve QOL and mood by enhancing coping skills and self-efficacy. These findings offer important insights into the mechanisms by which caregiver-directed interventions may enhance caregiver QOL and reduce their psychological distress.

Multimodal psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Caregivers of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) experience an immense caregiving burden before, during, and after HCT.

METHODS

We conducted an unblinded, randomized trial of a psychosocial intervention (BMT-CARE) for caregivers of patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic HCT at Massachusetts General Hospital. Caregivers were randomly assigned to BMT-CARE or usual care. BMT-CARE was tailored to the HCT trajectory and integrated treatment-related education and self-care with cognitive-behavioral skills to promote coping. Caregivers assigned to BMT-CARE met with a trained interventionist (a psychologist or a social worker) in person, via telephone, or via videoconferencing for 6 sessions starting before HCT and continuing up to day +60 after HCT. The primary endpoint was feasibility, which was defined as at least 60% of eligible caregivers enrolling and completing 50% or more of the intervention sessions. We assesed caregiver quality of life (QOL; Caregiver Oncology Quality of Life Questionnaire), caregiving burden (Caregiver Reaction Assessment), psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), self-efficacy (Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale-Transplant), and coping (Measures of Current Status) at baseline and 30 and 60 days after HCT. We used mixed linear effect models to assess the effect of BMT-CARE on outcomes longitudinally.

RESULTS

We enrolled 72.5% of eligible caregivers (100 of 138), and 80% attended 50% or more of the intervention sessions. Caregivers randomized to BMT-CARE reported improved QOL (B = 6.11; 95% CI, 3.50-8.71; P < .001), reduced caregiving burden (B = -6.02; 95% CI, -8.49 to -3.55; P < .001), lower anxiety (B = -2.18; 95% CI, -3.07 to -1.28; P < .001) and depression symptoms (B = -1.23; 95% CI, -1.92 to -0.54; P < .001), and improved self-efficacy (B = 7.22; 95% CI, 2.40-12.03; P = .003) and coping skills (B = 4.83; 95% CI, 3.04-6.94; P < .001) in comparison with the usual-care group.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief multimodal psychosocial intervention tailored for caregivers of HCT recipients is feasible and may improve QOL, mood, coping, and self-efficacy while reducing the caregiving burden during the acute HCT period.

Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults With Cancer at Risk for Poor Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Oncologists often struggle with managing the complex issues unique to older adults with cancer, and research is needed to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients aged ≥70 years within 8 weeks of a diagnosis of incurable gastrointestinal cancer. Patient-reported surveys were used to assess vulnerability (Vulnerable Elders Survey [scores ≥3 indicate a positive screen for vulnerability]), quality of life (QoL; EORTC Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire [higher scores indicate better QoL]), and symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS; higher scores indicate greater symptom burden] and Geriatric Depression Scale [higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms]). Unplanned hospital visits within 90 days of enrollment and overall survival were evaluated. We used regression models to examine associations among vulnerability, QoL, symptom burden, hospitalizations, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 132 patients approached, 102 (77.3%) were enrolled (mean [M] ± SD age, 77.25 ± 5.75 years). Nearly half (45.1%) screened positive for vulnerability, and these patients were older (M, 79.45 vs 75.44 years; P=.001) and had more comorbid conditions (M, 2.13 vs 1.34; P=.017) compared with nonvulnerable patients. Vulnerable patients reported worse QoL across all domains (global QoL: M, 53.26 vs 66.82; P=.041; physical QoL: M, 58.95 vs 88.24; P<.001; role QoL: M, 53.99 vs 82.12; P=.001; emotional QoL: M, 73.19 vs 85.76; P=.007; cognitive QoL: M, 79.35 vs 92.73; P=.011; social QoL: M, 59.42 vs 82.42; P<.001), higher symptom burden (ESAS total: M, 31.05 vs 15.00; P<.001), and worse depression score (M, 4.74 vs 2.25; P<.001). Vulnerable patients had a higher risk of unplanned hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.08-5.27; P=.032) and worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.14-4.48; P=.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults with cancer who screen positive as vulnerable experience a higher symptom burden, greater healthcare use, and worse survival. Screening tools to identify vulnerable patients should be integrated into practice to guide clinical care.

Neurology clinicians' views on palliative care communication: "How do you frame this?"

Background

The communication process of preparing patients and families facing progressive neurodegenerative diseases for future illness has not been empirically elucidated; the goal of this qualitative study was to explore neurology interdisciplinary health professionals' communication experiences, including current approaches, facilitators, and challenges.

Methods

Three focus groups were conducted with 22 clinicians representing a range of health professions from several multidisciplinary neurology outpatient clinics at a large academic medical center. A thematic analysis approach was used to develop a coding structure and identify overarching themes.

Results

Neurology clinicians highlighted that in their practice, (1) conversations are triggered by acute events and practical needs; (2) conversations occur routinely but are rarely documented; (3) loss of patient capacity and resultant surrogate decision-making can be ethically fraught, especially in times of family conflict; (4) prognostic uncertainty, unfamiliarity with disease trajectories, and patient or surrogate avoidance pose communication challenges; and (5) generalist- and specialty-level palliative care roles should be better defined.

Conclusions

There is a need for a systematic, structured approach to communication that can be applied early in the disease trajectory and considered when developing integrated neuro-palliative care programs.

Nature of Discussions about Systemic Therapy Discontinuation or Hospice among Patients, Families, and Palliative Care Clinicians during Care for Incurable Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Background: Patient/clinician communication is critical to quality cancer care at the end-of-life (EOL). Yet discussions about systemic therapy discontinuation or hospice as a care option are commonly deferred. Real-time communication about these complex topics has not been evaluated. Palliative care visits may provide useful insight into how communication about EOL care occurs over time. Objective: To explore the nature of discussions about systemic therapy discontinuation and hospice among patients, families, and palliative care clinicians during care for incurable cancer. Design: Qualitative study of palliative care visits. Setting/Subjects: We audiorecorded visits of patients and families who participated in a palliative care trial from diagnosis of incurable lung or noncolorectal gastrointestinal cancer through the course of cancer care (n = 30). Measurements: We used thematic analysis to characterize communication patterns in the context of clinical events. Results: Content and tenor of discussions shifted in relation to patient health status. In the absence of acute medical deterioration, discussions addressed hospice broadly as an EOL care option. Candid exchanges between patients and families and their clinicians supported increasing depth and specificity of EOL care communication. As clinicians identified that patients were not tolerating treatment, the clinicians encouraged contemplation about quality-of-life implications of continuing treatment or the possibility that treatment might harm more than help, in anticipation of change in health status. Conclusions: Longitudinal relationships with palliative care clinicians functioned through multiple pathways to support patients and families in making complex EOL care decisions. Results inform models and interventions of communication at the EOL.

Effect of inpatient palliative care on supportive care measures in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)

70

Background: Inpatient palliative care integrated with transplant care has been shown to improve patient-reported quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, and psychological distress during hospitalization for HCT. However, the impact of palliative care on supportive care practices during HSCT remains unknown. Methods: This secondary analysis is based on a single-site randomized clinical trial of 160 patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HSCT between 8/2014 and 1/2016. Participants received either inpatient palliative care integrated with transplant care (n = 81) or transplant care alone (n = 79). We used the electronic health record to obtain data on supportive care measures during HSCT including the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous pain medications, atypical antipsychotics (used to treat nausea/anxiety), psychostimulants, antidepressants, hypnotics, and the use of standing orders (as opposed to as needed ‘PRN’) for supportive care medications. We compared the proportion of subjects in each group receiving these supportive care measures using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Patients randomized to the palliative care intervention were more likely to use PCA (32.1% vs. 15.19%, P = 0.015), and atypical antipsychotics (35.8% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.012) compared to those receiving transplant care alone. Intervention participants were also more likely to have standing orders for their supportive care medications (74.1% vs. 56.9%, P = 0.030) compared to those receiving transplant care alone. Study groups did not differ in the of intravenous pain medications, psychostimulants, antidepressants, or hypnotics. Conclusions: Patients receiving inpatient integrated palliative and transplant care were more likely to utilize PCA and atypical antipsychotics during HCT compared to those receiving transplant care alone. Future work should examine whether these differences in supportive care practices mediate the effect of the palliative care intervention on patient-reported outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT02207322.

Randomized trial of a hospice video decision aid for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers

42

Background: Although hospice provides high-quality end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer, the service remains underutilized in part due to lack of adequate information provided to patients and families about hospice care. Methods: We conducted a single-site randomized clinical trial of a hospice video decision aid versus a verbal description in 150 hospitalized patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients without an available caregiver were eligible to participate. Intervention participants (75 patients; 18 caregivers) received a verbal description about hospice plus a six-minute video depicting hospice care. Control participants (75 patients; 26 caregivers) received only the verbal description. The primary endpoint was patient preference for hospice care immediately after the intervention, adjusting for baseline preferences. Secondary outcomes included patient and caregiver knowledge and perceptions of hospice, and hospice utilization. Results: Between 2/2017 and 1/2019, we enrolled 55.7% (150/269) of potentially eligible patients and 44 caregivers. Post-intervention, patients assigned to the video group were more likely to prefer hospice care (86.7% vs. 82.7%, OR = 2.85, P = 0.08), but this was not statistically significant. Patients in the video group reported greater knowledge about hospice (B = 0.50, P = 0.024) and were less likely to endorse that hospice care is only about death (6.7% vs. 21.6%, OR = 0.28, P = 0.035). Among patients who died (n = 116), those assigned to the intervention were more likely to utilize hospice (85.2% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.01) and had a longer hospice length-of-stay (LOS) (median 12 vs. 3 days, P < 0.001). Post-intervention, caregivers assigned to the video were more likely to prefer hospice care for their loved ones (94.4% vs. 65.4%, P = 0.031), reported greater knowledge about hospice (B = 1.94, P < 0.001), and were less likely to endorse that hospice care is only about death (0.0% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.066). Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers who viewed a hospice video decision aid were more informed about hospice, reported more favorable perceptions of hospice, and were more likely to utilize hospice and have a longer hospice LOS. Clinical trial information: NCT03040102.

Coping and Modifiable Psychosocial Factors are Associated with Mood and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of most common complications following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and the most significant contributor to morbidity and nonrelapse mortality. The physical burdens and psychosocial difficulties of these patients have not been described systematically. An exploration into the rates and correlates of mood and quality of life (QOL) in patients with chronic GVHD is necessary to develop a clinically relevant, evidence-based intervention to promote well-being. From July 2015 to July 2017, adult allogeneic HCT survivors with established moderate to severe chronic GVHD (N = 52) enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal study at a tertiary academic center. We examined the rates and correlates of depression and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and explored whether constructs including coping strategies (Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations), symptom burden (Lee Symptom Assessment Scale), physical functioning (Human Activity Profile), and perceived social support (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey) predicted QOL trajectory over time (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant) at the baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. Analyses adjusted for age, sex, chronic GVHD severity, and time since chronic GVHD diagnosis. At the baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up, 32.7%, 31.1%, and 37.8% of patients reported clinically significant depression symptoms, and 30.8%, 20.0%, and 36.4% reported clinically elevated anxiety symptoms, respectively. Adjusting for covariates, greater use of negative emotion-oriented coping (β = 0.20, P = .002), less use of task-oriented coping (β = -0.10, P = .021), worse physical functioning (β = -0.07, P = .004), and higher symptom burden (β = 0.07, P = .002) were independently associated with depression symptoms at baseline. Greater use of negative emotion-oriented coping (β = 0.28, P < .001) and worse physical functioning (β = -0.05, P = .034) were independently associated with anxiety at baseline. Patients who used more negative emotion-oriented coping (β = -0.58, P = .035), had less task-oriented (β = 0.40, P = .028) and social diversion-oriented coping (β = 0.35, P = .039), and had higher symptom burden (β = -0.30, P = .001), worse physical functioning (β = 0.32, P < .001), and lower perceived social support (β = 6.47, P = .003) at baseline reported poorer QOL over time. The unmet physical and psychosocial needs of patients with chronic GVHD are substantial and warrant investigation into evidence-based interventions that may improve QOL and mood by targeting modifiable psychosocial constructs identified in this study.

Patient Patterns and Perspectives on Using Opioid Regimens for Chronic Cancer Pain

CONTEXT

With increasing attention to the undertreatment of cancer pain in parallel with concerns about opioid misuse, little is known about how patients with advanced cancer adhere to opioid regimens for chronic cancer pain.

OBJECTIVES

We explored patient approaches to managing chronic cancer pain with long-acting opioids.

METHODS

In a multimethods study at an academic medical center, adult patients with chronic cancer pain (n = 17) used electronic pill caps to record adherence to prescribed long-acting opioid regimens. After eight weeks, patients viewed their adherence records and completed a semistructured interview about their opioid use. With a framework approach, we coded interview data (Kappa >0.95) and identified themes in how patients perceived and used opioids to manage cancer pain.

RESULTS

Patients (59% female; 94% non-Hispanic white; median age = 65 years) felt grateful about pain benefit from opioids yet concerned about opioid side effects and addiction/tolerance. Main reasons for nonadherence included both intentional decisions (e.g., skipping doses) and unintentional barriers (e.g., missing doses due to inconsistent sleep schedules). Overall, patients set their own opioid adherence goals and developed routines to achieve them. Residual pain varied and was not consistently linked with opioid adherence.

CONCLUSION

Patients commonly felt conflicted about using prescribed long-acting opioids to manage cancer pain due to concurrent perceptions of their risks and benefits, and they set their own parameters for opioid-taking practices. Intentional and unintentional deviations from prescribed opioid schedules highlight the need to enhance adherence communication, education, and counseling, to optimize the use of long-acting opioids as a component of cancer pain management.

Pilot randomized trial of a transdisciplinary geriatric intervention for older adults with cancer

11549

Background: Oncologists often struggle with managing the unique care needs of older adults with cancer. We sought to determine the feasibility of delivering a transdisciplinary geriatric intervention designed to address the geriatric (physical function & comorbidity) and palliative care (symptoms & prognostic understanding) needs of older adults with cancer. Methods: We randomly assigned patients age ≥65 with newly diagnosed incurable gastrointestinal (GI) or lung cancer to receive a transdisciplinary geriatric intervention or usual care. Intervention patients received two visits with a geriatrician who was trained to address patients’ palliative care needs in addition to conducting a geriatric assessment. We defined the intervention as feasible if > 70% of patients enrolled in the study and > 75% completed study visits and surveys. At baseline and week 12, we assessed patients’ quality of life (QOL, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General), symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System), and communication confidence (Perceived Efficacy in Patient Physician Interactions). As this was a pilot study, we calculated mean change scores in outcomes and estimated intervention effect sizes (ES). Results: From 2/2017-6/2018, we randomized 62 patients (55.9% enrollment rate [most common reason for refusal was feeling too ill]; median age = 72.3 [range 65.2-91.8]; 45.2% female; cancer types: 56.5% GI, 43.5% lung). Among intervention patients, 82.1% attended the first visit and 76.2% attended both. Overall, 77.8% completed all study surveys. Compared to usual care, intervention patients had less decrement in QOL scores (-0.77 vs -3.84, ES = .21), greater reduction in the number of moderate/severe symptoms (-0.69 vs +1.04, ES = .58), and more improvement in communication confidence (+1.06 vs -0.80, ES = .38). Conclusions: In this trial of older adults with advanced cancer, more than half enrolled in the study and over 75% of those who enrolled completed all study visits and surveys. Our effect size estimates suggest that a transdisciplinary intervention targeting patients’ geriatric and palliative care needs may be a promising approach to improve patients’ QOL, symptom burden, and communication confidence. Clinical trial information: NCT02868112.