Work-Life Balance Inequalities among Veterinary and Allied Professionals: A Qualitative Review

Background

This study aimed to review qualitative psychological and non-psychologically based literature for work-life balance (WLB) inequalities within the veterinary and other allied professions.

Methods

The PECO framework includes qualitative studies published in any language but with an English translation involving adult workers in the veterinary or allied profession and outcomes around work-life balance. Seven relevant electronic databases EMBASE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Social Policy and Practice, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, and Global Health, were used. The retrieved hits were exported to Endnote Desktop (Version 7.7.1) for sorting and management.

Results

Of the 3610 hits, 31 studies were eligible for narrative synthesis. The studies were published from 1980-2017 and came from 15 countries. 9(29%) of the 31 studies were from the USA. 22 of the 31 studies (71%) focused on a mix of professions. Data were collected in six different ways, with the most common being interviews (17 (54.8%) of 31 studies). Twenty-three questions were used to assess WLB. The most common ones focused on women becoming mothers, maternity leave, and return to work (five (16.1%) of 31 articles). Secondly were attitudes of ethnic minorities concerning education, employment, role-family conflict, etc., and family commitments (three (9.7%) of the 31 papers). Findings came under 74 different topics. Nineteen (25.7%) of the 74 topics occurred more than four times and were allocated under the appropriate sub-theme. The nine sub-themes include pregnancy, breastfeeding, motherhood, job/life satisfaction, age/gender/ethnic inequalities, return to work (RTW), health and lifestyle, dual-earning couples/family, workplace support, and work-family/family-work conflicts.

Conclusions

The review suggests that women, ethnic minorities, older staff, and those with health concerns are negatively impacted by inequalities around WLB in veterinary and allied professions.

Key messages

The findings from the review were used to support the development of psychological measures of work-life balance and gender differences. The results were used in online questionnaires/surveys for future participants within the veterinary profession in addressing inequalities.

Media coverage of evidence outputs during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from one national agency

Background

The COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team within the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) in Ireland produced a range of evidence-based reports on a broad range of public health topics related to COVID-19. These evidence outputs (EO) arose directly from questions posed by policy makers and clinicians supporting Ireland's National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET). Findings from these EOs informed the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland and influenced international public health guidance. How research findings are presented through domestic news can influence behaviour and risk perceptions.

Methods

We investigated traditional media coverage of nine COVID-19 EOs and associated press releases, published (April to July 2020) by HIQA. NVivo was used for conceptual content analysis of manifest content. ‘Core messages' from each evidence output were proposed and 488 sources from national and regional broadcast, print, and online media were coded at the phrase level. The presence of political and public health actors in coverage were also coded.

Results

Coverage largely did not distort or misrepresent the results of the EOs, however, there was variability in terms of what content was reported on and to what extent different stakeholders were involved in the contextualization of the findings of the EOs. Coverage appeared to focus more on ‘human-interest' stories as opposed to more technical reports (e.g. focusing on viral load, antibodies, testing, etc.). Selective reporting and the variability in the use of quotes from governmental and public health stakeholders changed and contextualized results in different manners than perhaps originally intended in the press release.

Conclusions

Our findings provide a case-study of European media coverage of evidence reports produced by a national agency. Results highlighted several strengths and weaknesses of current communication efforts.

Evaluating rapid review provision to inform policy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Evidence based decision making is central to population health, particularly during a pandemic. Few studies examine the production and use of evidence in decision-making during crisis management. This study describes and evaluates the provision of rapid evidence products by a single agency to support national decision making.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of evidence providers (who gathered and disseminated the required evidence) and service users (policy makers). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data of work activity were summarised descriptively.

Results

Three themes were generated from the data: the work, the use and the future, with a fourth theme cross-cutting across these: the team. The work followed clear protocols and was centrally managed. The scope and changing nature of the evidence were highlighted as issues. The service providers reported a strong sense of team work and ‘being in this together', however, the majority of the participants felt that the workload was huge and exhausting and not sustainable long-term. Overall the service users thought the rapid evidence synthesis was indispensable to the decision-making process and had trust and confidence in the work, largely based on existing working relationships with the team. While they recognised that the evidence synthesis support would be an essential component of the continued pandemic response, they did query the sustainability of the process and reflected on the amount of work the team performed.

Conclusions

This evaluation, drawing on qualitative data, has highlighted that, across the services users and evidence providers, the support provided by HIQA was generally perceived as positive. From the service users' perspective, having access to the team was indispensable to the decision making process. However, the sustainability of the work load was identified as a major challenge.

Evidence Synthesis to support the public health response during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

In January 2020, the Irish National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET) for COVID-19 was established. NPHET oversees and provides national direction, guidance, support and expert advice on the development and implementation of strategies to contain COVID-19 in Ireland. Since March 2020, HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team has provided research evidence to support the work of NPHET and associated groups and inform the development of national public health guidance. From September 2020, as part of the move towards a sustainable response to the public health emergency, HIQA also provides evidence based advice in response to requests from NPHET. The advice provided to NPHET is informed by research evidence developed by HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team and with expert input from HIQA's COVID-19 Expert Advisory Group.

Methods

This presentation describes the establishment and organisation of the COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team, with an overview of the processes and methodological approaches involved. The role of HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team in informing the public health response during the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed, along with the challenges and opportunities this presents. The relevance now and for future pandemic preparedness is outlined.

Results

As of 19 April 2021, HIQA has produced, and in some instances has regularly updated, 25 evidence summaries, 11 advice documents, 9 reviews of international guidance, 3 scoping reports, 5 reviews of care pathways, 2 analyses/models and 2 databases.

Conclusions

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, HIQA has developed and implemented a process to ensure rapid access to the best available evidence relevant to the COVID-19 outbreak to inform decision-making at each stage of the pandemic.

COVID-19 Public Health Guidance Database

Background

Since March 2020, members of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) team in HIQA have been identifying, reviewing and presenting COVID-19 public health guidance produced by international organisations. The aim of this work has been to inform the development of public health guidance and policy by the Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC), Department of Health and Health Service Executive (HSE), using international evidence and best practice.

Methods

International resources are searched on a weekly basis to identify new or updated public health guidance on COVID-19. The three distinct steps in the process include, searching relevant international resources, reviewing identified relevant public health guidance for COVID-19, and presenting new or updated guidance in a COVID-19 Public Health Guidance Database, which was created by the team using Microsoft Excel. The international organisations reviewed include the World Health Organisation, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as a range of ministries of health and public health agencies from 10 countries. These were chosen, based on guidance being available in English, widespread use of the organisation's advice, and/or the working constraints of the HTA team.

Results

The COVID-19 Public Health Guidance Database is updated weekly and provided to the relevant individuals within HPSC, Department of Health, and HSE, who are responsible for developing public health and infection, prevention and control guidance related to COVID-19 in Ireland. Following this the database is published online and may be utilised by the public or other international organisations.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 Public Health Guidance Database is used to inform the ongoing response to the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically, to inform the development of public health and infection, prevention and control guidance to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

COVID-19 - Interventions and lifestyle factors that prevent infection or minimise progression to severe disease

Background

This evidence summary synthesised the evidence relating to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in the community to prevent COVID-19/progression to severe disease. An additional aim was to identify potentially modifiable lifestyle factors associated with reduced risk of infection/progression to severe disease.

Methods

A systematic search of published peer-reviewed articles and non-peer-reviewed pre-prints was undertaken from 1 January 2020 to 19 April 2021; no language restrictions were applied. All potentially eligible papers were exported to Covidence. Titles/abstracts and full texts were single screened for relevance. Data extraction and quality appraisal of included studies was completed by a single reviewer and checked by a second.

Results

In total, 50 studies, three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one non-RCT and 46 cohort studies were included. The four included controlled trials tested variations of the pharmacological intervention, ivermectin. While these controlled trials reported a protective effect for ivermectin use, these trials were of poor quality and had serious risk of bias. Across 46 cohort studies, the modifiable lifestyle risk factors identified were obesity, smoking, vitamin D status, physical activity, alcohol consumption and processed meat consumption. These studies reported mixed results in terms of the association between modifiable lifestyle risk factors and poor COVID-19 outcomes.

Conclusions

At the time of writing there is no high quality evidence of benefit to support pharmacological interventions to prevent COVID-19. Although there were mixed results for the risk factors identified, maintenance of healthy weight, smoking cessation, engaging in physical activity and moderation of alcohol and processed meat consumption are likely to be beneficial to health and should continue to be encouraged.

Shelling the myth: allergies to Iodine containing substances and risk of reaction to Iodinated contrast media

PURPOSE

In excess of 100 million procedures using iodinated radio-contrast media are conducted each year. There is a common misunderstanding regarding the links between allergy to iodinated substances and the risk of allergic reaction to intravenous iodinated contrast agents. These perceived risks are managed via administration of corticosteroids or avoidance of iodinated contrast altogether.

METHODS

An extensive review of published literature on scientific databases and international guidelines was conducted in order to inform the research question. A questionnaire was formulated and distributed to hospital doctors in four tertiary centres. Within this questionnaire, hospital doctors were presented with six different scenarios of bona fide allergy to iodinated substances (e.g. shellfish) and asked to select the treatment response option which they deemed to be the most suitable from a choice of three (standard contrast scan/delay scan with pre-medication/change to non-contrast scan).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven questionnaire responses were received. Contrast (standard protocol) was the most appropriate regimen in the setting of all the listed allergies. This was identified correctly by 76%, 69%, 44%, 32%, 18% and 14% for kiwi, fish, poly-food, shellfish, betadine and tincture of iodine allergies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of understanding amongst local junior medical staff regarding administration of iodinated contrast media to patients with a history of allergy to iodinated substances. These misconceptions may potentiate the unnecessary usage of pre-medication and ordering of non-contrast scans in the setting of a gold-standard enhanced scan. Findings from this study suggest that there is a need for future education efforts targeted during the basic specialty training stage.

Anticholinergic drug use and risk of mortality for people with dementia in Northern Ireland

OBJECTIVE

Anticholinergic burden refers to the cumulative effect of medications which contain anticholinergic properties. We assessed how anticholinergic burden and different types of anticholinergic medications influence mortality rates among people with dementia in Northern Ireland. Our secondary aim was to determine what demographic characteristics predict the anticholinergic burden of people with dementia.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Enhanced Prescribing database for 25,418 people who were prescribed at least one dementia management medication between 2010 and 2016. Information was also extracted on the number of times each available anticholinergic drug was prescribed between 2010 and 2016, allowing the calculation of an overall anticholinergic burden. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine how anticholinergic burden influenced mortality whilst multilevel model regression determined what demographic characteristics influence overall anticholinergic burden.

RESULTS

Of the 25,418 people with dementia, only 15% (n = 3880) had no anticholinergic burden. Diazepam (42%) and risperidone (18%) were the two most commonly prescribed drugs. Unadjusted Cox proportional hazard models indicated that higher anticholinergic burden was associated with significantly higher mortality rates in comparison to people with dementia who had no anticholinergic burden (HR = 1.59: 95% CI = 1.07-2.36). In particular, urological (HR = 1.20: 95% CI = 1.05-1.38) and respiratory (HR = 1.17: 95% CI = 1.08-1.27) drugs significantly increased mortality rates. People with dementia living in areas with low levels of deprivation had significantly lower anticholinergic burden (HR=-.39: 95% CI=-.47:-30).

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing anticholinergic burden is essential for people with dementia. Further research should address the unfavourable prognosis of people living with dementia in highly deprived areas.

An agenda for research and action toward diverse and just futures for life on Earth

Decades of research and policy interventions on biodiversity have insufficiently addressed the dual issues of biodiversity degradation and social justice. New approaches are therefore needed. We devised a research and action agenda that calls for a collective task of revisiting biodiversity toward the goal of sustaining diverse and just futures for life on Earth. Revisiting biodiversity involves critically reflecting on past and present research, policy, and practice concerning biodiversity to inspire creative thinking about the future. The agenda was developed through a 2-year dialogue process that involved close to 300 experts from diverse disciplines and locations. This process was informed by social science insights that show biodiversity research and action is underpinned by choices about how problems are conceptualized. Recognizing knowledge, action, and ethics as inseparable, we synthesized a set of principles that help navigate the task of revisiting biodiversity. The agenda articulates 4 thematic areas for future research. First, researchers need to revisit biodiversity narratives by challenging conceptualizations that exclude diversity and entrench the separation of humans, cultures, economies, and societies from nature. Second, researchers should focus on the relationships between the Anthropocene, biodiversity, and culture by considering humanity and biodiversity as tied together in specific contexts. Third, researchers should focus on nature and economies by better accounting for the interacting structures of economic and financial systems as core drivers of biodiversity loss. Finally, researchers should enable transformative biodiversity research and action by reconfiguring relationships between human and nonhuman communities in and through science, policy, and practice. Revisiting biodiversity necessitates a renewed focus on dialogue among biodiversity communities and beyond that critically reflects on the past to channel research and action toward fostering just and diverse futures for human and nonhuman life on Earth.

An agenda for research and action toward diverse and just futures for life on Earth

Decades of research and policy interventions on biodiversity have insufficiently addressed the dual issues of biodiversity degradation and social justice. New approaches are therefore needed. We devised a research and action agenda that calls for a collective task of revisiting biodiversity toward the goal of sustaining diverse and just futures for life on Earth. Revisiting biodiversity involves critically reflecting on past and present research, policy, and practice concerning biodiversity to inspire creative thinking about the future. The agenda was developed through a 2-year dialogue process that involved close to 300 experts from diverse disciplines and locations. This process was informed by social science insights that show biodiversity research and action is underpinned by choices about how problems are conceptualized. Recognizing knowledge, action, and ethics as inseparable, we synthesized a set of principles that help navigate the task of revisiting biodiversity. The agenda articulates 4 thematic areas for future research. First, researchers need to revisit biodiversity narratives by challenging conceptualizations that exclude diversity and entrench the separation of humans, cultures, economies, and societies from nature. Second, researchers should focus on the relationships between the Anthropocene, biodiversity, and culture by considering humanity and biodiversity as tied together in specific contexts. Third, researchers should focus on nature and economies by better accounting for the interacting structures of economic and financial systems as core drivers of biodiversity loss. Finally, researchers should enable transformative biodiversity research and action by reconfiguring relationships between human and nonhuman communities in and through science, policy, and practice. Revisiting biodiversity necessitates a renewed focus on dialogue among biodiversity communities and beyond that critically reflects on the past to channel research and action toward fostering just and diverse futures for human and nonhuman life on Earth.

Myocardial perfusion quantification by CMR for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation

Background

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an established treatment for patients with advanced coronary artery disease (CAD). A subsequent recurrence of symptoms can cause the need for re-assessment of the coronary circulation. The accuracy of visually assessed stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection of obstructive CAD is reduced in patients with prior CABG. In patients with complex multi-vessel CAD, myocardial perfusion quantification by CMR is superior to visual assessment (VA) for detection of obstructive disease however patients with CABG have been absent from previous studies.

Purpose

This study sought to assess the performance of myocardial perfusion quantification by CMR against invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for detecting obstructive CAD in patients with previous CABG.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with a history of previous CABG and subsequent clinically indicated perfusion CMR study and invasive coronary angiography were recruited. Patients underwent a dual bolus stress perfusion CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging at 3 Tesla. Stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) was estimated at the coronary territory level according to the AHA 16 segment model using Fermi function-constrained deconvolution. Segments with transmural LGE were excluded from MBF analysis. Stress perfusion images were analysed visually alongside LGE images and matched perfusion-LGE defects were considered negative. On ICA, coronary territories with lumen stenosis >70% without an unobstructed bypass graft (<70% stenosis) were considered positive.

Results

86/87 coronary territories were suitable for analysis. Sixty-five territories had at least one bypass graft including 32 territories with arterial grafts. 28/86 territories (33%) had obstructive disease on angiography. Territories with obstructive CAD had significantly lower stress MBF than unobstructed territories (1.21 [IQR: 0.96–1.45] vs 1.58 [1.40–1.84] ml/g/min, p < 0.001, Figure 1). Stress MBF had good accuracy to detect coronary territories with obstructive CAD (sensitivity 71%, specificity 84%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.83, p < 0.001, Figure 2A). For visual assessment, sensitivity was 79%, specificity 78% and diagnostic accuracy 78%. When analysis was confined to only territories with bypass grafts, stress MBF had 78% sensitivity, 81% specificity and AUC of 0.85, p < 0.001 (Figure 2B).. In this subgroup, VA had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 76% and a 77% diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions

In patients with previous surgical revascularisation, quantification of stress myocardial blood flow by CMR offers good diagnostic accuracy for the detection and localisation of anatomically significant stenoses. Accuracy is reduced compared with published data in patients without coronary grafts but remains comparable to expert visual assessment.

Why do healthcare professionals fail to escalate as per the early warning system (EWS) protocol? A qualitative evidence synthesis of the barriers and facilitators of escalation

Background

Early warning systems (EWSs) are used to assist clinical judgment in the detection of acute deterioration to avoid or reduce adverse events including unanticipated cardiopulmonary arrest, admission to the intensive care unit and death. Sometimes healthcare professionals (HCPs) do not trigger the alarm and escalate for help according to the EWS protocol and it is unclear why this is the case. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to answer the question ‘why do HCPs fail to escalate care according to EWS protocols?’ The findings will inform the update of the National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC) National Clinical Guideline No. 1 Irish National Early Warning System (INEWS).

Methods

A systematic search of the published and grey literature was conducted (until February 2018). Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two reviewers independently using standardised data extraction forms and quality appraisal tools. A thematic synthesis was conducted by two reviewers of the qualitative studies included and categorised into the barriers and facilitators of escalation. GRADE CERQual was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Results

Eighteen studies incorporating a variety of HCPs across seven countries were included. The barriers and facilitators to the escalation of care according to EWS protocols were developed into five overarching themes: Governance, Rapid Response Team (RRT) Response, Professional Boundaries, Clinical Experience, and EWS parameters. Barriers to escalation included: Lack of Standardisation, Resources, Lack of accountability, RRT behaviours, Fear, Hierarchy, Increased Conflict, Over confidence, Lack of confidence, and Patient variability. Facilitators included: Accountability, Standardisation, Resources, RRT behaviours, Expertise, Additional support, License to escalate, Bridge across boundaries, Clinical confidence, empowerment, Clinical judgment, and a tool for detecting deterioration. These are all individual yet inter-related barriers and facilitators to escalation.

Conclusions

The findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis provide insight into the real world experience of HCPs when using EWSs. This in turn has the potential to inform policy-makers and HCPs as well as hospital management about emergency response system-related issues in practice and the changes needed to address barriers and facilitators and improve patient safety and quality of care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00403-9.

Partnering with general practitioners to optimize survivorship for patients with lymphoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial (the GOSPEL I trial)

BACKGROUND

Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia's Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma.

METHODS

We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed.

DISCUSSION

This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921 . Registered on 22 May 2020.

Implementing a nurse-enabled, integrated, shared-care model involving specialists and general practitioners in breast cancer post-treatment follow-up: a study protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial (the EMINENT trial)

Background

Due to advances in early detection and cancer treatment, 5-year relative survival rates for early breast cancer surpass 90% in developed nations. There is increasing focus on promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care are heavily reliant on hospital-based specialist-led care. This study aims to test the feasibility of the EMINENT intervention for implementing an integrated, shared-care model involving both cancer centre specialists and community-based general practitioners for early breast cancer post-treatment follow-up.

Methods

We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomised controlled trial with two parallel arms and 1:1 allocation. A total of 60 patients with early-stage breast cancer will be randomised to usual, specialist-led, follow-up care (as determined by the treating surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists) or shared follow-up care intervention (i.e. EMINENT). EMINENT is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared-care pathway with follow-up responsibilities divided between cancer centre specialists (i.e. surgeons and oncologists) and general practitioners. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast Cancer. Secondary outcomes include patient experience, acceptance, and satisfaction of care; dietary, physical activity, and sedentary behaviours; financial toxicity; adherence; health resource utilisation; and adverse events.

Discussion

The trial is designed to identify the barriers to implementing a shared-care model for breast cancer survivors following treatment. Results of this study will inform a definitive trial testing the effects of shared-care model on health-related quality of life of breast cancer survivors, as well as its ability to alleviate the growing demands on the healthcare system.

Trial registration

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001594112. Registered on 19 November 2019

A new approach to comprehensively evaluate the morphological properties of the human femoral head: example of application to osteoarthritic joint

Osteoarthritis affects the morphological properties of the femoral head. The goal of this study was to develop a method to elucidate whether these changes are localised to discrete regions, or if the reported trends in microstructural changes may be identified throughout the subchondral bone of the human femoral head. Whole femoral heads extracted from osteoarthritic (n = 5) and healthy controls (n = 5) underwent microCT imaging 39 μm voxel size. The subchondral bone plate was virtually isolated to evaluate the plate thickness and plate porosity. The trabecular bone region was divided into 37 volumes of interest spatially distributed in the femoral head, and bone morphometric properties were determined in each region. The study showed how the developed approach can be used to study the heterogeneous properties of the human femoral head affected by a disease such as osteoarthritis. As example, in the superior femoral head osteoarthritic specimens exhibited a more heterogeneous micro-architecture, with trends towards thicker cortical bone plate, higher trabecular connectivity density, higher trabecular bone density and thicker structures, something that could only be observed with the newly developed approach. Bone cysts were mostly confined to the postero-lateral quadrants extending from the subchondral region into the mid trabecular region. Nevertheless, in order to generalise these findings, a larger sample size should be analysed in the future. This novel method allowed a comprehensive evaluation of the heterogeneous micro-architectural properties of the human femoral head, highlighting effects of OA in the superior subchondral cortical and trabecular bone. Further investigations on different stages of OA would be needed to identify early changes in the bone.

Effect of size and location of simulated lytic lesions on the structural properties of human vertebral bodies, a micro-finite element study

Currently, the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score system is used in clinics to evaluate the risk of fracture in patients with spinal metastases. This method, however, does not always provide a clear guideline due to the complexity in accounting for the effect of metastatic lesions on vertebral stability. The aim of this study was to use a validated micro Finite Element (microFE) modelling approach to analyse the effect of the size and location of lytic metastases on the mechanical properties of human vertebral bodies. Micro Computed Tomography based microFE models were generated with and without lytic lesions simulated as holes within a human vertebral body. Single and multiple lytic lesions were simulated with four different sizes and in five different locations. Bone was assumed homogenous, isotropic and linear elastic, and each vertebra was loaded in axial compression. It was observed that the size of lytic lesions was linearly related with the reduction in structural properties of the vertebral body (reduction of stiffness between 3% and 30% for lesion volume between 4% and 35%). The location of lytic lesions did not show a clear effect on predicted structural properties. Single or multiple lesions with the same volume provided similar results. Locally, there was a homogeneous distribution of axial principal strains among the models with and without lytic lesions. This study highlights the potential of microFE models to study the effect of lesions on the mechanical properties of the human vertebral body.

•

MicroFE models can show the effect of lytic lesions on vertebral properties.

•

The size of the lesions was more critical than the location of the lesions.

•

Lesions affecting the cortical shell had a larger effect on the local strains.

•

Multiple lesions showed a similar effect to single lesions.

Empowering Women Researchers in the New Century: IADR's Strategic Direction

Gender inequality in science, medicine, and dentistry remains a central concern for the biomedical research workforce today. Although progress in areas of inclusivity and gender diversity was reported, growth has been slow. Women still face multiple challenges in reaching higher ranks and leadership positions while maintaining holistic success in these fields. Within dental research and academia, we might observe trends toward a more balanced pipeline. However, women continue to face barriers in seeking leadership roles and achieving economic equity and scholarship recognition. In an effort to evaluate the status of women in dental research and academia, the authors examined the role of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), a global research organization, which has improved awareness on gender inequality. The goal of this article is to review five crucial issues of gender inequality in oral health research and academics-workforce pipeline, economic inequality, workplace harassment, gender bias in scholarly productivity, and work-life balance-and to discuss proactive steps that the IADR has taken to promote gender equality. Providing networking and training opportunities through effective mentoring and coaching for women researchers, the IADR has developed a robust pipeline of women leaders while promoting gender equality for women in dental academia through a culture shift. As knowledge gaps remained on the levels of conscious and unconscious bias and sexist culture affecting women advancement in academics, as well as the intersectionality of gender with race, gender identity, ability status, sexual orientation, and cultural backgrounds, the IADR has recognized that further research is warranted.

INCLUSION OF TARGETED SKIN PRODUCTS IN THE PRE-SURGICAL TREATMENT REGIMEN OF PERIPHERAL LYMPHEDEMA & LIPEDEMA

Advanced lymphedema is associated with a number of adverse skin changes including color, thickening of the epidermis, dryness, and hyperkeratosis. These changes are related to prolonged lymph stasis and contribute to an increased risk of infection. Similarly, lipedema is associated with skin thickening and appearance of nodular adipose deposition. Skin care is essential in both conditions. We examined whether inclusion of targeted skin products for 2 weeks to an established pre-surgical conservative treatment program was associated with beneficial effects on the skin condition in 150 patients with lymphedema and lipedema. Patients were randomly assigned to control or one of two treatment groups. All three groups (and for both lymphedema and lipedema) demonstrated a significant reduction in softness. Dimpling/redness was significantly reduced in the targeted skin product groups for both patients with lymphedema or lipedema. Only patients with lipedema demonstrated a significant reduction in dryness/ hyperkeratosis following targeted skin product treatment. This study demonstrates that short-term use of targeted skin products in both patients with lymphedema and lipedema can be of benefit and further studies are needed to replicate these results and explore possible mechanisms.