26
|
Hatab T, Zaid S, Wessly P, Faza N, Little SH, Atkins MD, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Zoghbi WA, Goel SS. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Ineligible for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. STRUCTURAL HEART : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM 2023; 7:100206. [PMID: 38046865 PMCID: PMC10692344 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
|
27
|
Hatab T, Bou Chaaya RG, Zaid S, Wessly P, Satish P, Villanueva V, Faza N, Little SH, Atkins MD, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Zoghbi WA, Goel SS. Feasibility and Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-To-Edge Repair in Patients With Variable Degrees of Mitral Annular Calcification. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e031118. [PMID: 37753800 PMCID: PMC10727232 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Background The clinical significance of mitral annular calcification (MAC) in patients undergoing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is not well understood. There is limited evidence regarding the feasibility, durability of repair, and the prognostic value of MAC in this population. We sought to examine the prognostic value of MAC, its severity, and its impact on procedural success and durability of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Methods and Results We reviewed the records of 280 patients with moderate-severe or severe mitral regurgitation who underwent mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip from March 2014 to March 2022. The primary end point was cumulative survival at 1 year. Independent factors associated with the primary end point were identified using multivariable Cox regression. Among 280 patients included in the final analysis, 249 had none/mild MAC, and 31 had moderate/severe MAC. Median follow-up was 23.1 months (interquartile range: 11.1-40.4). Procedural success was comparable in the MAC and non-MAC groups (92.6% versus 91.4%, P=0.79) with similar rates of residual mitral regurgitation ≤2 at 1 year (86.7% versus 93.2%, P=0.55). Moderate/severe MAC was associated with less improvement in New York Heart Association III/IV at 30 days when compared with none/mild MAC (45.8% versus 14.3%, P=0.001). The moderate/severe MAC group had lower cumulative 1-year survival (56.8% versus 80.0%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.98 [95% CI, 1.27-3.10], P=0.002). Moderate/severe MAC and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality for mitral valve repair were independently associated with the primary end point (HR, 2.20 [1.10-4.41], P=0.02; and HR, 1.014 [1.006-1.078], P=0.02, respectively). Conclusions Mitral TEER is a safe and feasible intervention in selected patients with significant MAC and associated with similar mitral regurgitation reduction at 1 year compared with patients with none/mild MAC. Patients with moderate/severe MAC had a high 1-year mortality and less improvement in their symptoms after TEER.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hatab T, Zaid S, Wessly P, Reardon MJ, Atkins MD, Faza N, Little SH, Kleiman NS, Goel SS. TAV-in-TAV in Failed Homograft: Redo TAVI in a Patient With 3 Previous Sternotomies. JACC Case Rep 2023; 22:101973. [PMID: 37790767 PMCID: PMC10544086 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
A 59-year-old male patient with history of rheumatic heart disease with 3 previous surgical aortic valve replacements with the last one being homograft followed by transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed homograft presented with severe aortic regurgitation and cardiogenic shock requiring urgent TAV-in-TAV-in homograft. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
Collapse
|
29
|
Agarwal S, Thakkar S, Zaid S, Bansal A, Patel H, Akhtar K, Khosla J, Goel SS, Baber U. Impact of Frailty on Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. Am J Cardiol 2023; 203:301-303. [PMID: 37517124 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
|
30
|
Hatab T, Khan SU, Arshad HB, Zaid S, Wessly P, Faza N, Little SH, Reardon MJ, Atkins MD, Kleiman NS, Zoghbi WA, Goel SS. Meta-analysis of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2023; 2:101050. [PMID: 39132392 PMCID: PMC11308071 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
|
31
|
Ludwig S, Perrin N, Coisne A, Ben Ali W, Weimann J, Duncan A, Akodad M, Scotti A, Kalbacher D, Bleiziffer S, Nickenig G, Hausleiter J, Ruge H, Adam M, Petronio AS, Dumonteil N, Sondergaard L, Adamo M, Regazzoli D, Garatti A, Schmidt T, Dahle G, Taramasso M, Walther T, Kempfert J, Obadia JF, Chehab O, Tang GHL, Latib A, Goel SS, Fam NP, Andreas M, Muller DW, Denti P, Praz F, von Bardeleben RS, Granada JF, Modine T, Conradi L. Clinical outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement: two-year results of the CHOICE-MI Registry. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 19:512-525. [PMID: 37235388 PMCID: PMC10436071 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-01037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using dedicated devices is an alternative therapy for high-risk patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). AIMS This study aimed to assess the 2-year outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients undergoing TMVR from the multicentre CHOICE-MI Registry. METHODS The CHOICE-MI Registry included consecutive patients with symptomatic MR treated with 11 different dedicated TMVR devices at 31 international centres. The investigated endpoints included mortality and heart failure hospitalisation rates, procedural complications, residual MR, and functional status. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was applied to identify independent predictors of 2-year mortality. RESULTS A total of 400 patients, median age 76 years (interquartile range [IQR] 71, 81), 59.5% male, EuroSCORE II 6.2% (IQR 3.8, 12.0), underwent TMVR. Technical success was achieved in 95.2% of patients. MR reduction to ≤1+ was observed in 95.2% at discharge with durable results at 1 and 2 years. New York Heart Association Functional Class had improved significantly at 1 and 2 years. All-cause mortality was 9.2% at 30 days, 27.9% at 1 year and 38.1% at 2 years after TMVR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, reduced glomerular filtration rate, and low serum albumin were independent predictors of 2-year mortality. Among the 30-day complications, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, access site and bleeding complications showed the strongest impact on 2-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world registry of patients with symptomatic MR undergoing TMVR, treatment with TMVR was associated with a durable resolution of MR and significant functional improvement at 2 years. Two-year mortality was 38.1%. Optimised patient selection and improved access site management are mandatory to improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
32
|
Hatab T, Zaid S, Toro S, Wessly P, Malahfji M, Faza N, Little SH, Kleiman NS, Reardon MJ, Goel SS. Now You See Me Now You Don't: Subaortic Membrane Causing a Diagnostic Dilemma. JACC Case Rep 2023; 18:101916. [PMID: 37545690 PMCID: PMC10401130 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Subaortic stenosis secondary to subaortic membrane is the second most common form of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. We present the case of a 70-year-old male patient who presented with a 6-week history of progressive signs of heart failure. Multimodality imaging was required to confirm the presence of a subaortic membrane. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).
Collapse
|
33
|
Zaid S, Attizzani GF, Krishnamoorthy P, Yoon SH, Palma Dallan LA, Chetcuti S, Fukuhara S, Grossman PM, Goel SS, Atkins MD, Kleiman NS, Puri R, Bakhtadze B, Byrne T, Ibrahim AW, Grubb KJ, Tully A, Herrmann HC, Faggioni M, Ramlawi B, Khera S, Lerakis S, Dangas GD, Kini AS, Sharma SK, Reardon MJ, Tang GHL. First-in-Human Multicenter Experience of the Newest Generation Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Evolut FX TAVR System. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:1626-1635. [PMID: 37438029 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The latest-generation Evolut FX TAVR system (Medtronic) offers several potential design improvements over its predecessors, but early reported experience has been limited. OBJECTIVES This study sought to report our multicenter, limited market release, first-in-human experience of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Evolut FX system and compare it with a single-center PRO+ (Medtronic) experience. METHODS From June 27 to September 16, 2022, 226 consecutive patients from 9 US centers underwent transfemoral TAVR with the Evolut FX system for native aortic stenosis (89.4%) or prosthetic valve degeneration (10.6%). Commissural alignment was defined as 0° to 30° between native and FX commissures. Patient, anatomical, and procedural characteristics were retrospectively reviewed, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes per Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 definitions were reported. RESULTS Of 226 patients, 34.1% were low risk, 4% had a bicuspid valve, and 11.5% had a horizontal root (≥60°). Direct Inline sheath (Medtronic) was used in 67.6% and Lunderquist stiff wire (Cook Medical) in 35.4% of cases. Optimal hat marker orientation during deployment was achieved in 98.4%, with commissural alignment in 96.5%. At 30 days, 14.3% mild, 0.9% moderate, and no severe paravalvular leak were observed. Compared with the Evolut PRO+ experience from 1 center, FX had a more symmetrical implantation with shallower depth at the left coronary cusp (P < 0.001), fewer device recaptures (26.1% vs 39.5%; P = 0.004), and improved commissural alignment (96.5% vs 80.2%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The Evolut FX system demonstrated favorable 30-day outcomes with a significant improvement over PRO+ in achieving commissural alignment, fewer device recaptures, and more symmetrical implantation. These features may benefit younger patients undergoing TAVR with the supra-annular, self-expanding valve, where lifetime management would be important.
Collapse
|
34
|
Khan SU, Zahid S, Alkhouli MA, Akbar UA, Zaid S, Arshad HB, Little SH, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Goel SS. An Updated Meta-Analysis on Cerebral Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Intervention Stratified by Baseline Surgical Risk and Device Type. STRUCTURAL HEART : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM 2023; 7:100178. [PMID: 37520141 PMCID: PMC10382981 DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) can lead to the embolization of debris. Capturing the debris by cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce the risk of stroke. New evidence has allowed us to examine the effects of CEP in patients undergoing TAVI. We aimed to assess the effects of CEP overall and stratified by the device used (SENTINEL or TriGuard) and the surgical risk of the patients. Methods We selected randomized controlled trials using electronic databases through September 17, 2022. We estimated random-effects risk ratios (RR) with (95% confidence interval) and calculated absolute risk differences at 30 days across baseline surgical risks derived from the TAVI trials for any stroke (disabling and nondisabling) and all-cause mortality. Results Among 6 trials (n = 3921), CEP vs. control did not reduce any stroke [RR: 0.95 (0.50-1.81)], disabling [RR: 0.75 (0.18-3.16)] or nondisabling [RR: 0.99 (0.65-1.49)] strokes, or all-cause mortality [RR: 1.23 (0.55-2.77)]. However, when analyzed by device, SENTINEL reduced disabling stroke [RR: 0.46 (0.22-0.95)], translating into 6 fewer per 1000 in high-risk, 3 fewer per 1000 in intermediate-risk, and 1 fewer per 1000 in low surgical-risk patients. CEP vs. control did not reduce the risk of any bleeding [RR: 1.03 (0.44-2.40)], major vascular complications [RR: 1.41 (0.57-3.48)], or acute kidney injury [RR: 1.36 (0.57-3.28)]. Conclusions This updated meta-analysis showed that SENTINEL CEP might reduce disabling stroke in patients undergoing TAVI. Patients with high and intermediate surgical risks were most likely to derive benefits.
Collapse
|
35
|
Hatab T, Wessly P, Zaid S, Faza N, Chang SM, Kleiman NS, Little SH, Goel SS. When Echocardiography Is Challenging in Localizing Bioprosthetic Aortic Regurgitation: Dye Don't Lie. JACC Case Rep 2023; 15:101853. [PMID: 37283832 PMCID: PMC10240279 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Transesophageal echocardiography is the main imaging modality for localizing and quantifying prosthetic aortic regurgitation. We describe a case of bioprosthetic aortic paravalvular leak (PVL) where transesophageal echocardiography was inadequate; aortic root angiography and computed tomography fusion were critical in diagnosing and guiding closure. Multimodality imaging can be pivotal in localizing PVL and guiding transcatheter PVL closure. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
Collapse
|
36
|
Zaid S, Avvedimento M, Vitanova K, Akansel S, Bhadra OD, Ascione G, Saha S, Noack T, Tagliari AP, Pizano A, Donatelle M, Squiers JJ, Goel K, Leurent G, Asgar AW, Ruaengsri C, Wang L, Leroux L, Flagiello M, Algadheeb M, Werner P, Ghattas A, Bartorelli AL, Dumonteil N, Geirsson A, Van Belle E, Massi F, Wyler von Ballmoos M, Goel SS, Reardon MJ, Bapat VN, Nazif TM, Kaneko T, Modine T, Denti P, Tang GHL. Impact of Mitral Regurgitation Etiology on Mitral Surgery After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: From the CUTTING-EDGE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:1176-1188. [PMID: 37225288 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although >150,000 mitral TEER procedures have been performed worldwide, the impact of MR etiology on MV surgery after TEER remains unknown. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to compare outcomes of mitral valve (MV) surgery after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) stratified by mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology. METHODS Data from the CUTTING-EDGE registry were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeries were stratified by MR etiology: primary (PMR) and secondary (SMR). MVARC (Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium) outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were evaluated. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (IQR: 1.1-25.8 months) after surgery. RESULTS From July 2009 to July 2020, 330 patients underwent MV surgery after TEER, of which 47% had PMR and 53.0% had SMR. Mean age was 73.8 ± 10.1 years, median STS risk at initial TEER was 4.0% (IQR: 2.2%-7.3%). Compared with PMR, SMR had a higher EuroSCORE, more comorbidities, lower LVEF pre-TEER and presurgery (all P < 0.05). SMR patients had more aborted TEER (25.7% vs 16.3%; P = 0.043), more surgery for mitral stenosis after TEER (19.4% vs 9.0%; P = 0.008), and fewer MV repairs (4.0% vs 11.0%; P = 0.019). Thirty-day mortality was numerically higher in SMR (20.4% vs 12.7%; P = 0.072), with an observed-to-expected ratio of 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9-5.3) overall, 2.6 (95% CI: 1.2-4.0) in PMR, and 4.6 (95% CI: 2.6-6.6) in SMR. SMR had significantly higher 1-year mortality (38.3% vs 23.2%; P = 0.019). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the actuarial estimates of cumulative survival were significantly lower in SMR at 1 and 3 years. CONCLUSIONS The risk of MV surgery after TEER is nontrivial, with higher mortality after surgery, especially in SMR patients. These findings provide valuable data for further research to improve these outcomes.
Collapse
|
37
|
Goel SS, Reardon MJ. Is it Time to Move Beyond STS and TVT Scores for Predicting TAVR Mortality? JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2023; 2:100633. [PMID: 39130719 PMCID: PMC11307757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
|
38
|
Tang GHL, Zaid S, Kleiman NS, Goel SS, Fukuhara S, Marin-Cuartas M, Kiefer P, Abdel-Wahab M, De Backer O, Søndergaard L, Saha S, Hagl C, Wyler von Ballmoos M, Bhadra O, Conradi L, Grubb KJ, Shih E, DiMaio JM, Szerlip M, Vitanova K, Ruge H, Unbehaun A, Kempfert J, Pirelli L, Kliger CA, Van Mieghem N, Hokken TW, Adrichem R, Modine T, Corona S, Wang L, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Meier D, Webb JG, Cheung A, Ramlawi B, Herrmann HC, Desai ND, Andreas M, Mach M, Waksman R, Schults CC, Ahmad H, Goldberg JB, Geirsson A, Forrest JK, Denti P, Belluschi I, Ben-Ali W, Asgar AW, Taramasso M, Rovin JD, Di Eusanio M, Colli A, Kaneko T, Nazif TN, Leon MB, Bapat VN, Mack MJ, Reardon MJ, Sathananthan J. Explant vs Redo-TAVR After Transcatheter Valve Failure: Mid-Term Outcomes From the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR International Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:927-941. [PMID: 37100556 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Valve reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) failure has not been studied in detail. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to determine outcomes of TAVR surgical explantation (TAVR-explant) vs redo-TAVR because they are largely unknown. METHODS From May 2009 to February 2022, 396 patients in the international EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR registry underwent TAVR-explant (181, 46.4%) or redo-TAVR (215, 54.3%) for transcatheter heart valve (THV) failure during a separate admission from the initial TAVR. Outcomes were reported at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS The incidence of reintervention after THV failure was 0.59% with increasing volume during the study period. Median time from index-TAVR to reintervention was shorter in TAVR-explant vs redo-TAVR (17.6 months [IQR: 5.0-40.7 months] vs 45.7 months [IQR: 10.6-75.6 months]; P < 0.001], respectively. TAVR-explant had more prosthesis-patient mismatch (17.1% vs 0.5%; P < 0.001) as the indication for reintervention, whereas redo-TAVR had more structural valve degeneration (63.7% vs 51.9%; P = 0.023), with a similar incidence of ≥moderate paravalvular leak between groups (28.7% vs 32.8% in redo-TAVR; P = 0.44). There was a similar proportion of balloon-expandable THV failures (39.8% TAVR-explant vs 40.5% redo-TAVR; P = 0.92). Median follow-up was 11.3 (IQR: 1.6-27.1 months) after reintervention. Compared with redo-TAVR, TAVR-explant had higher mortality at 30 days (13.6% vs 3.4%; P < 0.001) and 1 year (32.4% vs 15.4%; P = 0.001), with similar stroke rates between groups. On landmark analysis, mortality was similar between groups after 30 days (P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS In this first report of the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR global registry, TAVR-explant had a shorter median time to reintervention, with less structural valve degeneration, more prosthesis-patient mismatch, and similar paravalvular leak rates compared with redo-TAVR. TAVR-explant had higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year, but similar rates on landmark analysis after 30 days.
Collapse
|
39
|
Reardon MJ, Goel SS. SAPIEN 3 Ultra: better sealing, reduced paravalvular leak and a move in the right direction? EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 18:1391-1392. [PMID: 37092270 PMCID: PMC10111123 DOI: 10.4244/eij-e-23-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
|
40
|
Goel SS, Reardon MJ. Indication Creep in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Data or Desire? JAMA Cardiol 2023:2804195. [PMID: 37074692 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
|
41
|
Khan SU, Lone AN, Akbar UA, Arshad HB, Arshad A, Arora S, Kaluski E, Aoun J, Goel SS, Shah AR, Kleiman NS. Assessment of Repeat Revascularization in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials as a Surrogate for Mortality: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol 2023; 48:101555. [PMID: 36529233 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The association of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with mortality is uncertain. To assess the association of repeat revascularization after PCI with mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We identified randomized controlled trials comparing PCI with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) using electronic databases through January 1, 2022. We performed a random-effects meta-regression between repeat revascularization rates after PCI (absolute risk difference [%] between PCI and CABG or OMT) with the relative risks (RR) of mortality. We assessed surrogacy of repeat revascularization for mortality using the coefficient of determination (R2), with threshold of 0.80. In 33 trials (21,735 patients), at median follow-up of 4 (2-7) years, repeat revascularization was higher after PCI than CABG [RR: 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.99-3.03)], but lower vs OMT [RR: 0.64 (0.46-0.88)]. Overall, meta-regression showed that repeat revascularization rates after PCI had no significant association with all-cause mortality [RR: 1.01 (0.99-1.02); R2=0.10) or cardiovascular mortality [RR: 1.01 (CI: 0.99-1.03); R2=0.09]. In PCI vs CABG (R2=0.0) or PCI vs OMT trials (R2=0.28), repeat revascularization did not meet the threshold for surrogacy for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (R2=0.0). We observed concordant results for subgroup analyses (enrollment time, follow-up, sample size, risk of bias, stent types, and coronary artery disease), and multivariable analysis adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, risk of bias, MI, and follow-up duration. In summary, this meta-regression did not establish repeat revascularization after PCI as a surrogate for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abraham B, Sous M, Sedhom R, Megaly M, Roman S, Sweeney J, Alkhouli M, Pollak P, El Sabbagh A, Garcia S, Goel SS, Saad M, Fortuin D. Meta-Analysis on Transcarotid Versus Transfemoral and Other Alternate Accesses for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2023; 192:196-205. [PMID: 36821875 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Transcarotid access has emerged as the preferred access site for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with prohibitive iliofemoral anatomy. This study aimed to compare outcomes with transcarotid with those of other accesses in patients who underwent TAVI. Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases were searched for all published studies that compared outcomes with transcarotid with those of other accesses (transfemoral, transaxillary/subclavian, transaortic, and transapical) in patients who underwent TAVI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, major vascular complications, stroke, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation, and peri-aortic valve insufficiency. We included 22 observational studies with a total of 11,896 patients. Outcomes were reported during hospitalization and at 1-month follow-up. The transcarotid approach had higher mortality at 1 month (3.7% vs 2.6%, p = 0.02) but lower major vascular complications during hospitalization (1.5% vs 3.4%, p = 0.04) than did transfemoral access. The transcarotid approach had lower major vascular complications (2% vs 2.3%, p = 0.04) than did the transaxillary/subclavian but higher major bleeding (5.3% vs 2.6%, p = 0.03). The transaortic approach was associated with higher in-hospital (11.7% vs 1.9%, p = 0.02) and 1-month mortality (14.4% vs 3.9%, p = 0.007) rates than was transcarotid access. The transcarotid approach numerically reduced mortality and the risk of major vascular complications and major bleeding compared with the transapical approach; however, this did not reach statistical significance. The transcarotid approach did not increase the risk of stroke compared with transfemoral or the other alternative accesses. In conclusion, the transcarotid or transaxillary/subclavian approach had associated comparable outcomes that were better than those of the transapical and transaortic approaches. There was no difference in stroke risk between transcarotid access and other accesses.
Collapse
|
43
|
Agrawal A, Reardon MJ, Goel SS. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Mitral Annular Calcification: A Review. Heart Int 2023; 17:19-26. [PMID: 37456353 PMCID: PMC10339466 DOI: 10.17925/hi.2023.17.1.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a progressive degenerative calcification of the mitral valve (MV) that is associated with mitral stenosis, regurgitation or both. Patients with MAC are poor candidates for MV surgery because of technical challenges and high peri-operative mortality. Transcatheter MV replacement (TMVR) has emerged as an option for such high surgical risk patients. This has been described with the use of the SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve (valve-in-MAC) and dedicated TMVR devices. Careful anatomic assessment is important to avoid complications of TMVR, such as left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, valve migration, embolization and paravalvular mitral regurgitation. In this review, we discuss the pathology, importance of preprocedural multimodality imaging for optimal patient selection, clinical outcomes and complications associated with TMVR in patients with MAC.
Collapse
|
44
|
Hatab T, Zaid S, Toro S, Little SH, Kleiman NS, Reardon MJ, Goel SS. NOW YOU SEE ME NOW YOU DON’T: SUBAORTIC MEMBRANE CAUSING A DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)04290-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
|
45
|
Wessly P, Hatab T, Zaid S, Telmesani A, Ali SA, Khan S, Hinohara T, Faza NN, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Zoghbi WA, Little SH, Goel SS. INTRAPROCEDURAL HEMODYNAMIC RISK PROFILING USING PULMONARY VEIN FLOW CHANGE TO PREDICT CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER MITRAL TRANSCATHETER EDGE TO EDGE REPAIR (TEER). J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)01255-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
46
|
Sammour YM, Spertus JA, Kennedy K, Morrow DA, Daniels LB, Jones P, Alger H, Stevens L, Shah A, Goel SS, de Lemos JA, Hayek SS, Sutton NR, Kleiman NS. Site-level variability in the processes of care and outcomes over time among patients with COVID-19 and myocardial injury: Insights from the American Heart Association's COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL PLUS : CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2023; 27:100265. [PMID: 36779177 PMCID: PMC9894823 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) levels in patients with COVID-19 has been associated with worse outcomes. Guidelines on best practices of those patients remain uncertain. Methods We included patients with COVID-19 and cTn above the assay-specific upper limit of normal (ULN) enrolled in the American Heart Association's COVID-19 registry between March 2020-January 2021. Site-level variability in invasive coronary angiography, LVEF assessment, ICU utilization, and inpatient mortality were determined by calculating adjusted median odds ratio (MOR) using hierarchical logistic regression models. Temporal trends were assessed with Cochran-Armitage trend test. Results Among 32,636 patients, we included 6234 (19.4 %) with cTn above ULN (age 68.7 ± 16.0 years, 56.5 % male, 51.5 % Caucasian), of whom 1365 (21.6 %) had ≥5-fold elevations. Across 55 sites, the median rate of invasive coronary angiography was 0.1 % with adjusted MOR 1.5(1.0,2.3), median LVEF assessment was 25.5 %, MOR 3.0(2.2,3.9), ICU utilization was 41.7 %, MOR 2.2(1.8,2.6), and mortality was 20.9 %, MOR 1.7(1.5,2.0). Over time, we noted a significant increase in invasive coronary angiography (p-trend = 0.001), and LVEF assessment (p-trend<0.001), and reduction in mortality (p-trend<0.001), without significant change in ICU admissions (p-trend = 0.08). Similar variability and temporal trends were seen among patients with ≥5-fold cTn elevation. Conclusions The use of invasive coronary angiography among patients with COVID-19 and myocardial injury was very low during the early pandemic. We found moderate institutional variability in processes of care with an uptrend in invasive catheterization and LVEF assessment, and downtrend in mortality. Comparative effectiveness studies are needed to examine whether variability in care is associated with differences in outcomes.
Collapse
|
47
|
Thakkar S, Zahid S, Hashem AM, Ali OTA, Gowda SN, Ullah W, Khan S, Patel H, Mohamed MS, Faza NN, Goel SS. TRENDS, PREDICTORS, AND OUTCOMES OF MITRAL TRANSCATHETER EDGE-TO-EDGE REPAIR AS SALVAGE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK-INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES NATIONWIDE READMISSION DATABASE. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)01299-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
48
|
Zahid S, Thakkar S, Patel HP, Hashem A, Faza NN, Goel SS. Outcomes of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Index Hospitalization Undergoing Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the United States Nationwide Readmission Database. JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY & INTERVENTIONS 2023; 2:100571. [PMID: 39129812 PMCID: PMC11307917 DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
|
49
|
Zahid S, Khan M, Ullah W, Arshad A, Zaid S, Little SH, Kleiman NS, Goel SS, Khan S. MACHINE LEARNING DERIVED RISK-PREDICTION MODEL FOR 30-DAY READMISSION FOLLOWING MITRAL TRANSCATHETER EDGE TO EDGE REPAIR. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)01272-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
50
|
Hatab T, Wessly P, Okunrintemi V, Zaid S, Chinnadurai P, Kleiman NS, Little SH, Goel SS. WHEN ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IS CHALLENGING IN LOCALIZING BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC REGURGITATION - DYE DON’T LIE …!! J Am Coll Cardiol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)04292-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|