Critical evaluation of the use of extinction paradigms for the assessment of opioid-induced conditioned place preference in rats

The rewarding effects of drugs of abuse are often studied by means of the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. CPP is one of the most widely used models in behavioral pharmacology, yet its theoretical underpinnings are not well understood, and there are very few studies on the methodological and theoretical aspects of this model. An important drawback of the classical CPP paradigm is that it often does not show dose-dependent results. The persistence of the conditioned response, i.e. the time required until the CPP effect is extinct, may be related to the strength of conditioning, which in turn may be related to the rewarding efficacy of a drug. Resistance to extinction may therefore be a useful additional measure to quantify the rewarding effect of drugs. In the present study we examined the persistence of drug-environment associations after conditioning with morphine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.), oxycodone (0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg i.p.) and heroin (0.05, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) by repeated retesting in the CPP apparatus (15-min sessions, 5 days/week) until the rats reached extinction (i.e. less than 55% preference over 3 consecutive sessions). Following an unbiased CPP protocol, morphine, oxycodone and heroin induced CPP with minimal effective doses of 3, 1 and 0.25 mg/kg, respectively, and with similar effect sizes for each CPP-inducing dose. The number of sessions required for extinction was positively correlated with the dose of the drug (experiment 1: 18 and 45 sessions for 3 and 10 mg/kg morphine, and 19 and 27 sessions for 1 and 3 mg/kg oxycodone; experiment 2: 12 and 24 sessions for 3 and 10 mg/kg morphine, and 10 and 14 sessions for 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg heroin). These findings suggest that the use of an extinction paradigm can extend the quantitative assessment of the rewarding effect of drugs - however, within certain limits only. The present paradigm appears to be less suited for comparing the rewarding efficacy of different drugs due to great test-retest variability. Finally, the additional potential gain of information using this paradigm has to be weighed against the considerably large amount of additional time and effort.

Pharmacological blockade or genetic knockout of the NOP receptor potentiates the rewarding effect of morphine in rats

The Nociceptin/OrphaninFQ (NOP) system is believed to be involved in drug abuse and addiction. We have recently demonstrated that activation of the NOP receptor, by systemic administration of the NOP receptor agonist Ro65-6570, attenuated the rewarding effect of various opioids in conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats and this attenuating effect was reversed by the NOP receptor antagonist J-113397. The present study demonstrates that co-administration of J-113397 (4.64 mg/kg, i.p.) during conditioning, facilitates morphine-induced CPP. Moreover, we found that NOP receptor knockout rats (oprl1(-/-)) are more sensitive to the rewarding effect of morphine than wildtype control rats. Thus, pharmacological or genetic inactivation of the NOP system rendered rats more susceptible to the rewarding effect of morphine. These findings support the suggestion that the endogenous NOP system attenuates the rewarding effect of opioids and therefore offers a therapeutic target for the treatment of drug abuse and addiction.

Synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol in analgesia

The novel centrally acting analgesic tapentadol [(-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride] combines two mechanisms of action, μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI), in a single molecule. Pharmacological antagonism studies have demonstrated that both mechanisms of action contribute to the analgesic effects of tapentadol. This study was designed to investigate the nature of the interaction of the two mechanisms. Dose-response curves were generated in rats for tapentadol alone or in combination with the opioid antagonist naloxone or the α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. Two different pain models were used: 1) low-intensity tail-flick and 2) spinal nerve ligation. In each model, we obtained dose-effect relations to reveal the effect of tapentadol based on MOR agonism, NRI, and unblocked tapentadol. Receptor fractional occupation was determined from tapentadol's brain concentration and its dissociation constant for each binding site. Tapentadol produced dose-dependent analgesic effects in both pain models, and its dose-effect curves were shifted to the right by both antagonists, thereby providing data to distinguish between MOR agonism and NRI. Both isobolographic analysis of occupation-effect data and a theoretically equivalent methodology determining interactions from the effect scale demonstrated very pronounced synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol. This may explain why tapentadol is only 2- to 3-fold less potent than morphine across a variety of preclinical pain models despite its 50-fold lower affinity for the MOR. This is probably the first demonstration of a synergistic interaction between the occupied receptors for a single compound with two mechanisms of action.

The antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic effect of tapentadol is partially retained in OPRM1 (μ-opioid receptor) knockout mice

Activation of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI) are well recognized as analgesic principles in acute and chronic pain indications. The novel analgesic tapentadol combines MOR agonism and NRI in a single molecule. The present study used OPRM1 (MOR) knockout (KO) mice to determine the relative contribution of MOR activation to tapentadol-induced analgesia in models of acute (nociceptive) and chronic (neuropathic) pain. Antinociceptive efficacy was inferred from paw withdrawal latencies on a 48 °C hot plate in naive animals. Antihyperalgesic efficacy was inferred from the number of nocifensive reactions in diabetic animals (streptozotocin-induced) and non-diabetic controls on a 50 °C hot plate. The effect of tapentadol (0.316-31.6 mg/kg IP) and the MOR agonist morphine (3-10 mg/kg IP) was determined in OPRM1 KO- and congenic wildtype mice. At baseline, diabetic OPRM1 KO mice showed reduced nocifensive reactions as compared to diabetic wildtype mice. In both pain models, morphine and tapentadol were effective in wildtype mice. In the KO mice, however, morphine failed to produce analgesia in either model. On the other hand, tapentadol still had clear effects, and when tested at a dose that was fully efficacious in wildtype mice, showed reduced but still significant antinociceptive efficacy in non-diabetic, and antihyperalgesic efficacy in diabetic OPRM1 KO mice. The remaining antinociceptive activity of tapentadol in OPRM1 KO mice was abolished by the α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. In OPRM1 wildtype mice, the antihyperalgesic effect of tapentadol was 10 times more potent in diabetic animals (ED₅₀=1.10 mg/kg) than its antinociceptive effect in naïve animals (ED₅₀=10.8 mg/kg). This study supports the conclusion that the analgesic effect of tapentadol is only partly due to the activation of MOR, both under acute and chronic pain conditions, and that the efficacy of tapentadol against acute and chronic pain is based on its combined mechanism of action.

The mGluR5 antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) potentiates conditioned place preference induced by various addictive and non-addictive drugs in rats

We have recently reported that the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) potentiates acquisition of conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by heroin and ketamine. The present study investigated to what extent this effect of MPEP can be generalized to other classes of drugs, such as the stimulants nicotine and cocaine, and to drugs that produce CPP in the rat despite a lack of abuse potential in humans, such as buspirone and clonidine. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to a standard unbiased CPP protocol (six conditioning sessions lasting 20 minutes for nicotine and 40 minutes for the other compounds). Rats were conditioned with either nicotine (0.05-0.2 mg/kg, subcutaneously), cocaine [1-10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)], buspirone (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.) or clonidine (0.2-0.6 mg/kg, i.p.) in combination with MPEP (0 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.). For nicotine and cocaine, the minimal effective dose to induce CPP was lowered by pre-treatment with MPEP. While buspirone and clonidine did not induce CPP when given alone (i.e. combined with MPEP vehicle), both compounds induced CPP after pre-treatment with MPEP. It is concluded that MPEP consistently potentiates acquisition of drug-induced reward, independent of the mechanism of action of the co-administered drug. We suggest that the proposed anti-abuse effect of MPEP may be due to a substitution-like effect.

Tramadol increases extracellular levels of serotonin and noradrenaline as measured by in vivo microdialysis in the ventral hippocampus of freely-moving rats

Tramadol is an atypical opioid with monoamine re-uptake inhibition properties. The aim of the current study was to compare, using in vivo microdialysis, the effect of tramadol on extracellular serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) levels in the rat ventral hippocampus with the effects of the dual 5-HT/NA inhibitors (SNRIs) duloxetine and venlafaxine, the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine, the selective 5-HT re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram, and the selective NA re-uptake inhibitor (NRI) reboxetine. It was found that tramadol, duloxetine and venlafaxine increased extracellular levels of both, 5-HT and NA, in a dose-dependent manner. Clomipramine also increased extracellular 5-HT and NA levels, however not dose-dependently in the tested dose range. Citalopram selectively increased extracellular 5-HT levels. Reboxetine increased extracellular NA levels and also to a minimal degree 5-HT levels. It can be concluded that, albeit less efficacious, the effects of tramadol on serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission resemble those of the dual 5-HT and NA re-uptake inhibitors duloxetine, venlafaxine, and clomipramine, and are different from those of the SSRI citalopram and the NRI reboxetine.

Effects of the NOP receptor agonist Ro65-6570 on the acquisition of opiate- and psychostimulant-induced conditioned place preference in rats

Activation of the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor may have anti-abuse effects. The present study examined the consequence of NOP receptor activation on the rewarding effect of opiates and psychostimulants in the conditioned place preference task in rats. First, the motivational effect of the NOP receptor agonists Ro64-6198 (0.316-3.16 mg/kg i.p.) and Ro65-6570 (1-10mg/kg i.p.) when administered alone, was assessed. Ro65-6570 was selected for further drug combination studies since, unlike Ro64-6198, it was devoid of an intrinsic motivational effect. Next, the minimal effective dose to induce reward for the opiates heroin (0.1-3.16 mg/kg i.p.), morphine (1-10mg/kg i.p.), hydrocodone (0.316-10mg/kg i.p.), tilidine (1-31.6 mg/kg i.p.), hydromorphone (0.1-10mg/kg i.p.), and oxycodone (0.0316-10mg/kg i.p.), as well as for the psychostimulants cocaine (3.16-31.6 mg/kg i.p.) and dexamphetamine (0.316-3.16 mg/kg i.p.) in combination with Ro 65-6570 (0 or 3.16 mg/kg i.p.) was determined. All drugs produced conditioned place preference, and for opiates and cocaine, but not for dexamphetamine, the minimal effective dose was higher when combined with Ro65-6570 (3.16 mg/kg i.p.). Attenuation of the rewarding effect of tilidine (3.16 mg/kg i.p.) and oxycodone (1mg/kg i.p.) by Ro65-6570 (3.16 mg/kg i.p.) could be reversed by pre-treatment with the NOP receptor antagonist J-113397 (4.64 mg/kg i.p.), suggesting that the attenuating effect of Ro65-6570 on opiates is due to activation of the NOP receptor. Taken together, the present study suggests that activation of NOP receptors effectively attenuates the rewarding effect of opiates, but may be less effective in reducing psychostimulant-induced reward.

Tapentadol hydrochloride: a next-generation, centrally acting analgesic with two mechanisms of action in a single molecule

Tapentadol exerts its analgesic effects through micro opioid receptor agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition in the central nervous system. Preclinical studies demonstrated that tapentadol is effective in a broad range of pain models, including nociceptive, inflammatory, visceral, mono- and polyneuropathic models. Moreover, clinical studies showed that tapentadol effectively relieves moderate to severe pain in various pain care settings. In addition, it was reported to be associated with significantly fewer treatment discontinuations due to a significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal-related adverse events compared with equivalent doses of oxycodone. The combination of these reduced treatment discontinuation rates and tapentadol efficacy for the relief of moderate to severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain may offer an improvement in pain therapy by increasing patient compliance with their treatment regimen.

Tapentadol, but not morphine, selectively inhibits disease-related thermal hyperalgesia in a mouse model of diabetic neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain in diabetic patients is a common distressing symptom and remains a challenge for analgesic treatment. Selective inhibition of pathological pain sensation without modification of normal sensory function is a primary aim of analgesic treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. Tapentadol is a novel analgesic with two modes of action, mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibition. Mice were rendered diabetic by means of streptozotocin, and neuropathic hyperalgesia was assessed in a 50 degrees C hot plate test. Normal nociception was determined in control mice. Tapentadol (0.1-1mg/kg i.v.) and morphine (0.1-3.16 mg/kg i.v.) dose-dependently attenuated heat-induced nociception in diabetic animals with full efficacy, reaching >80% at the highest doses tested. Tapentadol was more potent than morphine against heat hyperalgesia, with ED(50) (minimal effective dose) values of 0.32 (0.316) and 0.65 (1)mg/kg, respectively. Non-diabetic controls did not show significant anti-nociception with tapentadol up to the highest dose tested (1mg/kg). In contrast, 3.16 mg/kg morphine, the dose that resulted in full anti-hyperalgesic efficacy under diabetic conditions, produced significant anti-nociception in non-diabetic controls. Selective inhibition of disease-related hyperalgesia by tapentadol suggests a possible advantage in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain when compared with classical opioids, such as morphine. It is hypothesized that this superior efficacy profile of tapentadol is due to simultaneous activation of MOR and inhibition of NA reuptake.

The mGlu5 receptor antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) supports intravenous self-administration and induces conditioned place preference in the rat

We recently reported that the mGlu5 receptor antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) reduces intravenous self-administration of ketamine and, to a lesser extent, heroin in rats. We also found that MPEP potentiates conditioned place preference induced by these drugs, suggesting that the reduction of self-administration results from an MPEP-induced potentiation of the rewarding effect of the self-administered drug. The aim of the present study was to examine whether MPEP has intrinsic positive reinforcing and rewarding effects. In experiment 1, rats were trained to self-administer either ketamine [0.5 mg/kg/infusion, 2 h sessions, fixed-ratio (FR) 3] or heroin (0.05 mg/kg/infusion, 1 h sessions, FR 10), followed by a number of substitution sessions with MPEP (1 mg/kg/infusion) or saline. In experiment 2, drug-naïve rats were allowed to acquire intravenous self-administration of MPEP (1 mg/kg/infusion, 2 h sessions, FR 3) or saline. In experiment 3, rats were subjected to a single-trial unbiased conditioned place preference protocol with MPEP (0.3-10 mg/kg i.v., 20 min conditioning). It was found that (1) substitution with MPEP in rats which had learned to self-administer ketamine or heroin resulted in stable self-administration behavior, whereas substitution with saline resulted in a typical extinction profile, (2) drug-naïve rats learned to self-administer MPEP, but not saline, and self-administration remained stable for at least 7 sessions, and (3) MPEP induced dose-dependent place preference with a minimal effective dose of 3 mg/kg. These data clearly demonstrate that MPEP has (weak) positive reinforcing and rewarding effects when administered i.v.

Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade

Conditioned place preference (CPP) continues to be one of the most popular models to study the motivational effects of drugs and non-drug treatments in experimental animals. This is obvious from a steady year-to-year increase in the number of publications reporting the use this model. Since the compilation of the preceding review in 1998, more than 1000 new studies using place conditioning have been published, and the aim of the present review is to provide an overview of these recent publications. There are a number of trends and developments that are obvious in the literature of the last decade. First, as more and more knockout and transgenic animals become available, place conditioning is increasingly used to assess the motivational effects of drugs or non-drug rewards in genetically modified animals. Second, there is a still small but growing literature on the use of place conditioning to study the motivational aspects of pain, a field of pre-clinical research that has so far received little attention, because of the lack of appropriate animal models. Third, place conditioning continues to be widely used to study tolerance and sensitization to the rewarding effects of drugs induced by pre-treatment regimens. Fourth, extinction/reinstatement procedures in place conditioning are becoming increasingly popular. This interesting approach is thought to model certain aspects of relapse to addictive behavior and has previously almost exclusively been studied in drug self-administration paradigms. It has now also become established in the place conditioning literature and provides an additional and technically easy approach to this important phenomenon. The enormous number of studies to be covered in this review prevented in-depth discussion of many methodological, pharmacological or neurobiological aspects; to a large extent, the presentation of data had to be limited to a short and condensed summary of the most relevant findings.

(–)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-Dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol Hydrochloride (Tapentadol HCl): a Novel μ-Opioid Receptor Agonist/Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor with Broad-Spectrum Analgesic Properties

(-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride (tapentadol HCl) is a novel micro-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist (Ki = 0.1 microM; relative efficacy compared with morphine 88% in a [35S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assay) and NE reuptake inhibitor (Ki = 0.5 microM for synaptosomal reuptake inhibition). In vivo intracerebral microdialysis showed that tapentadol, in contrast to morphine, produces large increases in extracellular levels of NE (+450% at 10 mg/kg i.p.). Tapentadol exhibited analgesic effects in a wide range of animal models of acute and chronic pain [hot plate, tail-flick, writhing, Randall-Selitto, mustard oil colitis, chronic constriction injury (CCI), and spinal nerve ligation (SNL)], with ED50 values ranging from 8.2 to 13 mg/kg after i.p. administration in rats. Despite a 50-fold lower binding affinity to MOR, the analgesic potency of tapentadol was only two to three times lower than that of morphine, suggesting that the dual mode of action of tapentadol may result in an opiate-sparing effect. A role of NE in the analgesic efficacy of tapentadol was directly demonstrated in the SNL model, where the analgesic effect of tapentadol was strongly reduced by the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine but only moderately attenuated by the MOR antagonist naloxone, whereas the opposite was seen for morphine. Tolerance development to the analgesic effect of tapentadol in the CCI model was twice as slow as that of morphine. It is suggested that the broad analgesic profile of tapentadol and its relative resistance to tolerance development may be due to a dual mode of action consisting of both MOR activation and NE reuptake inhibition.

Effects of venlafaxine and desipramine on heroin-induced conditioned place preference in the rat

Venlafaxine, an antidepressant with serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibiting properties, has been reported to reduce acquisition (but not maintenance) of heroin intravenous self-administration (IVSA) in rats. The present study investigated whether this phase-dependent effect is due to an antidepressant-induced attenuation of the rewarding effect of heroin, as assessed in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. In order to study the effects of venlafaxine and the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine on acquisition and expression of heroin CPP, both compounds were administered prior to the conditioning sessions (together with heroin), or prior to the expression test after conditioning, respectively. As clinical evidence indicates that antidepressants require repeated administration for full efficacy, additional experiments were performed in which both antidepressants were administered for 2 weeks prior to conditioning, or for 1 week prior to the expression test, respectively. When tested alone, heroin [0.05-3.16 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.)] produced a dose-dependent CPP, whereas the antidepressants (1-21.5 mg/kg i.p.) produced neither a CPP nor a conditioned place aversion (CPA). For both antidepressants (10 mg/kg i.p.), neither acute nor repeated pretreatment affected acquisition or expression of heroin (0.5 mg/kg) CPP. Thus, the present study does not support the hypothesis that the previously observed attenuation of acquisition of heroin IVSA by venlafaxine is due to an antidepressant-induced attenuation of the rewarding effect of heroin. It is conceivable, however, that the rewarding effect of the 0.5 mg/kg dose of heroin was too pronounced to be susceptible to modulation by antidepressants. Alternatively, the modulation of acquisition of heroin IVSA in the previous study may be related to mechanisms that cannot be modelled with the CPP paradigm.

The serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine attenuates acquisition, but not maintenance, of intravenous self-administration of heroin in rats

Opioids and antidepressants are frequently used for the treatment of various pain conditions. A combination of both drug classes may be more effective than either treatment alone, and combined treatment with an antidepressant may result in an opiate-sparing effect. Although it has been shown that antidepressants can attenuate self-administration of psychomotor stimulant and depressant drugs, it is not known whether they also attenuate self-administration of opiates. To determine whether venlafaxine, a serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor with antidepressive and analgesic properties, affects acquisition and maintenance of intravenous heroin self-administration in rats, male Long-Evans rats were trained to press a lever in order to receive heroin (0.05 mg/kg/infusion) under a fixed ratio or a progressive ratio schedule. A control group was trained in a fixed ratio food-reinforced operant procedure. The effect of venlafaxine on operant responding for heroin and food was assessed both during acquisition and, in separate groups of rats, during maintenance (i.e., after acquisition) of self-administration behaviour. Daily treatment with venlafaxine (10 mg/kg i.p.) before the operant session attenuated the acquisition of responding for heroin, but not for food. However, when tested during the maintenance phase in rats showing stable responding, acute treatment with venlafaxine only marginally affected operant responding for heroin under a fixed ratio:10 schedule of reinforcement, and neither acute nor subchronic (once daily during 4 weeks) venlafaxine treatment affected responding under a progressive ratio schedule. Thus, daily treatment with an antidepressant attenuates the acquisition of heroin self-administration in a behaviourally specific manner, while having only marginal effects on maintenance of heroin self-administration.

Glutamatergic mechanisms in different disease states: overview and therapeutical implications -- an introduction

Glutamate is the most widely distributed excitatory transmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). It is acting via large - and still growing - families of receptors: NMDA-, AMPA-, kainate-, and metabotropic receptors. Glutamate has been implicated in a large number of CNS disorders, and it is hoped that novel glutamate receptor ligands offer new therapeutic possibilities in disease states such as chronic pain, stroke, epilepsy, depression, drug addiction and dependence or Parkinson's disease. While an extensive preclinical literature exists showing potential beneficial effects of NMDA-, AMPA-, kainate- and metabotropic receptor ligands, only NMDA receptor antagonists have been characterized clinically to any appreciable degree. In these trials it has been shown that while several compounds are therapeutically active, they also produce serious side effects at therapeutic doses. Current interest largely centers on the development of receptor subtype-selective compounds, namely compounds selective for receptors containing the NR2B subunit. Preclinical findings and the first clinical results are encouraging, and it may be that such subunit-selective compounds may have a sufficiently wide therapeutic window to be safe for human use.

Reassessment of buprenorphine in conditioned place preference: temporal and pharmacological considerations

RATIONALE

Buprenorphine is widely used as an analgesic drug and it is also increasingly considered for maintenance and detoxification of heroin addicts. It is a potent micro -receptor partial agonist with a long duration of action. An inverted U-shaped dose-effect curve for buprenorphine conditioned place preference (CPP) has been shown previously.

OBJECTIVES

We re-evaluated the CPP effects of buprenorphine by taking into account the particular kinetic properties of the drug in the design of the experiments.

METHODS

An unbiased CPP procedure with different wash-out periods was used to investigate a possible influence of the long duration of action of buprenorphine on the outcome of the experiment.

RESULTS

Following a standard procedure (drug and vehicle conditioning on alternating days), the inverted U-shaped dose-effect curve was reproduced (no CPP at 0.01 mg/kg, significant CPP at 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg, and no CPP at 3.16 and 10 mg/kg, IP). However, when there was a 48 h interval between drug and vehicle conditioning, there was a clear tendency towards CPP for the two highest doses, and when there was a 72-h interval between drug and vehicle conditioning, significant CPP was seen. Naloxone (0.215 mg/kg SC), haloperidol (0.215 mg/kg IP) and U-50488 (1.0 mg/kg SC) blocked buprenorphine (1.0 mg/kg) CPP. Buprenorphine CPP was also blocked by coadministration of naltrindole (3.16 mg/kg IP), nor-binaltorphimine (4.64 mg/kg SC), and naloxonebenzoylhydrazone (0.464 mg/kg SC). However, the data suggest that blockade by the three latter drugs was due to state-dependency effects. Buprenorphine at doses of 1.0 mg/kg and higher also produced locomotor sensitization across the 3 drug conditioning days. The sensitization produced by 1.0 mg/kg buprenorphine was blocked by haloperidol and U-50488, but not by naloxone, naltrindole, nor-binaltorphimine, and naloxonebenzoylhydrazone.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that the reported lack of CPP effects at high doses of buprenorphine may be due to factors in the experimental design, resulting in a carry-over effect from drug- to vehicle conditioning. They also suggest that buprenorphine, like other opiates, produces its CPP effects via micro -receptors, although kappa-antagonistic mechanisms also appear to be involved. The implications of these findings for the safety of buprenorphine for human use are discussed.

Glutamatergic mechanisms in addiction

Traditionally, addiction research in neuroscience has focused on mechanisms involving dopamine and endogenous opioids. More recently, it has been realized that glutamate also plays a central role in processes underlying the development and maintenance of addiction. These processes include reinforcement, sensitization, habit learning and reinforcement learning, context conditioning, craving and relapse. In the past few years, some major advances have been made in the understanding of how glutamate acts and interacts with other transmitters (in particular, dopamine) in the context of processes underlying addiction. It appears that while many actions of glutamate derive their importance from a stimulatory interaction with the dopaminergic system, there are some glutamatergic mechanisms that contribute to addiction independent of dopaminergic systems. Among those, context-specific aspects of behavioral determinants (ie control over behavior by conditioned stimuli) appear to depend heavily on glutamatergic transmission. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms might open new avenues to the treatment of addiction, in particular regarding relapse prevention.

Lack of sensitization during place conditioning in rats is consistent with the low abuse potential of tramadol

Based on the recent finding that tramadol (TRAM) produces conditioned place preference (CPP) and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, it was suggested that the abuse liability of TRAM may be greater than hitherto assumed. We re-evaluated the effects of TRAM in CPP and behavioral sensitization, in comparison with morphine (MOR) and meptazinol (MEPT), an opioid drug with minimal abuse potential. While MOR produced CPP and very strong locomotor sensitization, TRAM and MEPT produced only CPP. It has been suggested that sensitization plays an important role in the development of addiction, hence our results suggest that the abuse potential of TRAM might resemble more that of MEPT than that of MOR, and they are consistent with the clinical picture, in that although TRAM is not completely devoid of positively reinforcing effects, reports on abuse are rare. The low propensity to induce addiction may be related to the lack of changes in the brain circuitry mediating reward and motivation, as evidenced by the lack of sensitization.

Behavioral pharmacology of buprenorphine, with a focus on preclinical models of reward and addiction

RATIONALE

Buprenorphine is a potent mu-receptor partial agonist and is widely used as an analgesic drug. It is also increasingly considered to be an alternative to methadone in the maintenance and eventual detoxification of heroin addicts, and also in the treatment of cocaine addiction. So far, buprenorphine has been available as a sublingual tablet and as a solution for IV injection. Recently, a new transdermal formulation of buprenorphine in slow-release matrix patches has been introduced (Transtec) for the treatment of intermediate to severe pain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to review, from a preclinical perspective, the current status of what is known about the behavioral pharmacology of buprenorphine, with a particular emphasis on the issues of reward, addiction, and dependence. It will also point to open questions that should be addressed in the future to improve our understanding of the effects and the mechanisms of action of this drug.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Since buprenorphine is a potent opioid drug, the issue of addiction and dependence in this context is an important one. Although there are still some gaps in the behavioral pharmacological characterization of buprenorphine, the general conclusion that can be drawn from the reviewed literature is that despite the high affinity of buprenorphine for the mu receptor it appears to be a remarkably safe drug, with a benign overall side effect profile and low addictive and dependence-inducing potential. This favorable side effect profile appears to be due, to a large extent, to the partial agonistic properties of the drug, in combination with its particular receptor kinetics (i.e. very slow dissociation from the mu receptor after binding).

NMDA receptor antagonists as analgesics: focus on the NR2B subtype

Ifenprodil and a group of related compounds are selective antagonists of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors. These compounds are antinociceptive in a variety of preclinical pain models and have a much lower side-effect profile compared with other NMDA receptor antagonists. It remains unclear whether the improved safety of these compounds is due to their subtype selectivity or to a unique mode of inhibition of the receptor. Human trials have so far confirmed the good tolerability of these subtype-selective NMDA receptor antagonists; however, whether they are as effective as other NMDA receptor antagonists in pain patients remains to be demonstrated.

Functional relationship among medial prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, and ventral tegmental area in locomotion and reward

Prominent projections of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to the nucleus accumbens (NAS) and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) exist, but it has been difficult to assign a clear functional role to either of these projections. With some exceptions to be discussed in some detail, only a few neurochemical and behavioral effects of manipulating the mPFC can be explained by invoking the mPFC-NAS projection, while most effects are compatible with an involvement of the mPFC-VTA-NAS or mPFC-pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg)-VTA-NAS circuits. What is known about the organization and function of these loops is generally consistent with the results obtained by stimulating or lesioning or injecting drugs into the mPFC, yet these findings are largely inconsistent with the functional organization of the mPFC-NAS projection. This review briefly summarizes some of the most important aspects of what is known about the functional interactions of the mPFC. NAS, VTA, and associated areas, and focuses on functional differences between the mesocortical and the mesoaccumbal dopaminergic projections, and between the corticomesencephalic and the corticoaccumbal glutamatergic projections.

The medial prefrontal cortex as a part of the brain reward system

This review will briefly summarize experimental evidence for an involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in reward-related mechanisms in the rat brain. The mPFC is part of the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic system. It receives prominent dopaminergic input from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and, via the mediodorsal thalamus, inputs from other subcortical basal ganglia structures. In turn it projects back to the VTA and the nucleus accumbens septi (NAS), which are generally considered as main components of the brain reward system. Evidence for the involvement of the mPFC in reward-related mechanisms comes mainly from three types of studies, conditioned place preference (CPP), intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), and self-administration. Work will be summarized that has shown that certain drugs injected into the mPFC can produce CPP or that lesions of the mPFC can disrupt the development of CPP, that ICSS is obtained with the stimulating electrode placed in the mPFC, and that certain drugs are self-administered into the mPFC or that lesions of the mPFC disrupt the peripheral self-administration of certain drugs. However, it has also been shown that the role of the mPFC in reward is not uniform. For example, the mPFC appears to be particularly important for the rewarding actions of cocaine, while it appears not to be important for the rewarding actions of amphetamine. Also, different subareas of the mPFC appear to be differentially involved in the rewarding actions of different drugs. Taken together, the available evidence shows that some drugs can produce reward directly within the mPFC, and that some drugs, even though not having direct rewarding effects within the mPFC, depend on the function of the mPFC for the mediation of their rewarding effects.

Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been known to be involved in the mediation of complex behavioral responses. Considerable research efforts are directed towards refining the knowledge about the function of this brain area and the role it plays in cognitive performance and behavioral output. In the first part, this review provides, from a pharmacological perspective, an overview of anatomical, electrophysiological and neurochemical aspects of the function of the PFC, with an emphasis on the mesocortical dopamine system. Anatomy of the mesocortical system, basic physiological and pharmacological properties of neurotransmission within the PFC, and interactions between dopamine and glutamate as well as other transmitters within the mesocorticolimbic circuit are included. The coverage of these data is largely restricted to what is relevant for the second part of the review which focuses on behavioral studies that have examined the role of the PFC in a variety of phenomena, behaviors and paradigms. These include reward and addiction, locomotor activity and sensitization, learning, cognition, and schizophrenia. Although the focus of this review is on the mesocortical dopamine system, given the intricate interactions of dopamine with other transmitter systems within the PFC and the importance of the PFC as a source of glutamate in subcortical areas, these aspects are also covered in some detail where appropriate. Naturally, a topic as complex as this cannot be covered comprehensively in its entirety. Therefore this review is largely limited to data derived from studies using rats, and it is also specifically restricted to data concerning the medial PFC (mPFC). Since in several fields of research the findings concerning the function or role of the mPFC are relatively inconsistent, the question is addressed whether these inconsistencies might, at least in part, be related to the anatomical and functional heterogeneity of this brain area.

Blockade of behavioral sensitization by MK-801: fact or artifact? A review of preclinical data

RATIONALE

It is widely assumed that various forms of neural and behavioral plasticity, including sensitization, are strongly dependent on the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptors, but evidence also exists to suggest that not all forms of sensitization are unequivocally blocked by NMDA-receptor antagonism. Also, findings from studies examining the effects of NMDA-receptor blockade on forms of behavioral plasticity other than locomotor sensitization (various forms of tolerance, sensitization of catalepsy, and learning and conditioning) reinforce the view that forms of behavioral plasticity exist that are not blocked by NMDA-receptor antagonists.

OBJECTIVES

Since the publication of two reviews addressing this issue in detail, this field of research has continued to be very active and controversial, and a number of further studies have been published in the meantime which are relevant to the topic. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of this literature and to consider new approaches that might make important contributions to the present discussion.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The studies reviewed herein have produced results both consistent with and in contradiction to the view that MK-801 and related drugs block behavioral plasticity, and the debate about how exactly MK-801 and related drugs interact with other drugs in sensitization experiments is still in full swing. What seems crucial for future studies relating to this subject is a careful experimental design to reduce the number of potential interpretations of the findings.

Differential effects of discrete subarea-specific lesions of the rat medial prefrontal cortex on amphetamine- and cocaine-induced behavioural sensitization

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of the rat is thought to be important for the initiation of behavioural sensitization. Since the mPFC is not a homogenous structure, we attempted to systematically examine the contribution of the different subareas - infralimbic (il), prelimbic (pl), anterior cingulate (cg) - of the mPFC to the induction of sensitization by selectively lesioning these areas or the whole mPFC with quinolinic acid (45 nmol in 0.5 microl). During an initial habituation session only il or whole mPFC lesions reduced spontaneous activity. Lesioned and sham-lesioned animals were then treated every other day with either saline, DL-amphetamine (3 mg/kg), or cocaine (20 mg/kg) for 2 weeks in their home cages and were then challenged with either DL-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) or cocaine (10 mg/kg) after 1 day and 2 weeks of withdrawal. None of the lesions affected the development of amphetamine-induced sensitization in any way, as assessed by several behavioural parameters including locomotion and sniffing. In contrast, cocaine-induced sensitization was significantly attenuated by pl and whole mPFC lesions, while il and cg lesions were without effect. These results show a double dissociation of the role of the mPFC in behavioural sensitization. The mPFC seems to be important only for cocaine- but not for amphetamine-induced sensitization, and only the pl area appears to be of relevance for cocaine-induced sensitization. It is suggested that these differences are due to differences in the pharmacological interaction of cocaine and amphetamine with the mesocortical dopamine system, and to the particular anatomical connections of each of the mPFC subregions.