Establishment and implementation of a nurse-led interdisciplinary management strategy for central line maintenance: A single-center experience

Objectives

This study aimed to establish and implement an interdisciplinary management strategy led by senior nurses via a vascular access specialist team (VAST) at a teaching hospital.

Methods

In 2021, the hospital established and implemented a nurse-led VAST management strategy to improve the quality of clinical central line maintenance. The VAST comprised senior nurses specialized in intravenous therapy, ultrasound/radiology technologists, medical doctors with central venous catheterization certificates, central line maintenance nurses, and administrative coordinators. The management strategy mainly included systemic on-the-job training for VAST members, the establishment of an interdisciplinary central line emergency "green channel," the formation of a VAST-based, nurse-led standardized clinical rounding system, and the standardization of central line self-care instructions for patients. During the pre- (July 2020 to April 2021) and post- (May 2021 to May 2022) of the implementation the interdisciplinary management strategy, overall patients' self-care ability, the success rate of catheterization at first time, central line management compliance rate, and patients' satisfaction with catheter maintenance were investigated and compared.

Results

The results showed the score self-care ability was increased from 74.75 ± 18.4 (pre-VAST) to 99.10 ± 23.65 (post- VAST); the success rate for catheterization at first time was improved to 100% (225/225), compared to 92.9% (209/225) at pre-VAST; the central line management compliance rate was also increased to 99.6% (224/225) at post-VAST from 93.3% (210/225) at pre-VAST. A patient satisfaction survey on catheter maintenance showed improvements in all five indicators were compared to the pre- VAST (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The nurse-led VAST interdisciplinary strategy can effectively improve the quality of clinical central line management and should be used to reinforce clinical catheterization and maintenance of central lines.

Understanding pediatric palliative care within interdisciplinary palliative programs: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

To describe the process of delivery of pediatric palliative care from the perspective of a pediatric interdisciplinary team and the children's parents.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive case study was conducted. Purposeful sampling took place within a specialized pediatric palliative care Unit in Madrid (Spain), located at the Niño Jesus Hospital. The study participants included a specialized pediatric palliative care team from Madrid's pediatric palliative care program, other professional teams involved in interdisciplinary care and parents of children under pediatric palliative care. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews, focus groups and researchers' field notes. A thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

This study included 28 participants (20 women, 8 men), of whom 18 were professionals who belonged to the pediatric palliative care interdisciplinary team, 4 professionals were from other units that collaborated with the pediatric palliative care, and 6 were parents (5 women, 1 man). The mean age of the pediatric palliative care members was 38.2 years (SD ± 7.9), that of the collaborating professionals was 40.5 (SD ± 6.8), and that of the parents was 44.2 (SD ± 5.4). Two main themes emerged: a) Pediatric palliative care has a distinct identity, associated with life. It represents the provision of special care in highly complex children, in the context of the home, far from the hospital environment; b) The team is key: its interdisciplinary organization provides a more comprehensive view of the child and their family, fosters communication among professionals, and improves coordination with other services involved in the care of children. The mindset shift experienced by ID-PPC professionals towards a palliative approach makes them more sensitive to the needs of their patients and leads them to develop specific skills in areas such as communication, decision-making, and adaptability that were identified as differentiating aspects of pediatric palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Describing pediatric palliative care from the professional and parental perspective helps to establish realistic and comprehensive goals for the care of children and their parents. The findings of this study may help with the establishment of a pediatric palliative care team, as a necessary organizational change in a health care system that cares for children with complex and life-threatening conditions. Promoting training in pediatric palliative care, prioritizing more horizontal organizations, providing tools and spaces for coordination and communication between professionals from different services, together with the creation of a position of case coordinator in the care process of children could enhance the understanding of pediatric palliative care services.

Barriers to Adoption of a Secure Text Messaging System: a Qualitative Study of Practicing Clinicians

BACKGROUND

Secure text messaging systems (STMS) offer HIPAA-compliant text messaging and mobile phone call functionalities that are more efficient than traditional paging. Although some studies associate improved provider satisfaction and healthcare delivery with STMS use, healthcare organizations continue to struggle with achieving widespread and sustained STMS adoption.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the barriers to adoption of an STMS among physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs).

DESIGN

We qualitatively analyzed free-text comments that clinicians (physicians and APPs) across a large healthcare organization offered on a survey about STMS perceptions.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1110 clinicians who provided a free-text comment in response to one of four open-ended survey questions.

APPROACH

Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach and constant comparative method to characterize responses and identify themes.

KEY RESULTS

The overall survey response rate was 20.5% (n = 1254). Clinicians familiar with the STMS frequently believed the STMS was unnecessary (existing tools worked well enough) and would overburden them with more communications. They were frustrated that the STMS app had to be downloaded onto their personal mobile device and that it drained their battery. Ambiguity regarding who was reachable in the app led to missed messages and drove distrust of the STMS. Clinicians saw the exclusion of other care team members (e.g., nurses) from the STMS as problematic; however, some clinicians at hospitals with expanded STMS access complained of excessive messages. Secondhand reports of several of these barriers prevented new users from downloading the app and contributed to ongoing low use.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians are reluctant to adopt an STMS that does not offer a clear and trustworthy communication benefit to offset its potential burden and intrusiveness. Our findings can be incorporated into STMS implementation strategies that maximize active users by targeting and mitigating barriers to adoption.

Living with Type 2 Diabetes: Podcast of a Patient-Physician Discussion

For patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the journey to diagnosis may not be straightforward. Patients can present with one of many diabetic complications before a diagnosis of T2D is made. These include heart disease and chronic kidney disease, in addition to cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy, and neuropathies, all of which can be asymptomatic in the early stages. In their clinical guidelines on standards of care in diabetes, the American Diabetes Association recommends regular screening for conditions such as kidney disease in patients with T2D. Furthermore, the frequent coexistence of diabetes and cardiorenal and/or metabolic conditions often requires a holistic approach to patient management, with specialists from multiple disciplines, including cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians, working together. In addition to the use of pharmacological therapies, which can improve prognosis, the management of T2D should include attention to patient self-care, including appropriate dietary changes, consideration of continuous glucose monitoring, and advice on physical exercise. In this podcast, a patient and a clinician discuss a lived experience of the diagnosis of T2D, and the importance of patient education for understanding and managing T2D and its complications. The discussion highlights the central role of the Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist, and the role of ongoing emotional support in managing life with T2D, including patient education through reputable online resources and peer support groups. Podcast video with Pamela Kushner (PK) and Anne Dalin (AD) (MP4 92088 KB).

Facilitators and Barriers to the Implementation of BETTER WISE, a Chronic Disease and Prevention Intervention in Canada: A Qualitative Study

The aim of the BETTER WISE intervention is to address cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS) and lifestyle risks in patients aged 40-65. The purpose of this qualitative study is to better understand facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the intervention. Patients were invited for a 1-h visit with a prevention practitioner (PP), a member of a primary care team, with specific skills in prevention, screening, and cancer survivorship. We collected and analyzed data from 48 key informant interviews and 17 focus groups conducted with 132 primary care providers and from 585 patient feedback forms. We analyzed all qualitative data using a constant comparative method informed by grounded theory and then employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in a second round of coding. The following key elements were identified: (1) Intervention characteristics-relative advantage and adaptability; (2) Outer setting-PPs compensating for increased patient needs and decreased resources; (3) Characteristics of individuals-PPs (patients and physicians described PPs as compassionate, knowledgeable, and helpful); (4) Inner setting-network and communication (collaboration and support in teams or lack thereof); and (5) Process-executing the implementation (pandemic-related issues hindered execution, but PPs adapted to challenges). This study identified key elements that facilitated or hindered the implementation of BETTER WISE. Despite the interruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the BETTER WISE intervention continued, driven by the PPs and their strong relationships with their patients, other primary care providers, and the BETTER WISE team.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in patients worldwide and the main cause of cancer-related death. Though still incurable, metastatic breast cancer's prognosis has been considerably improved in the past 10 years due to the introduction of new targeted agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, these medications are associated with unique side effects known as immune-mediated adverse events (irAE). In this paper, we review the clinical evidence for the use of ICIs in breast cancer, in both the metastatic as well as neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting, followed by a review of irAE most commonly seen, and the medications used to treat them. Our opinion is that any cancer specialist treating patients with breast cancer should be aware of these side effects for early detection and management, and oncologists should be the leaders of the multidisciplinary team that will take care of them.

Improving care for older patients visiting emergency departments. Are they receiving falls prevention guideline care?

BACKGROUND

The primary objective was to examine whether the Emergency Department (ED) treatment of older adults who fall in Australia is concordant with falls prevention and management clinical guideline care recommendations.

METHODS

A retrospective medical records audit was completed for patients 65years and older, who attended the ED with a fall and were discharged home. An audit tool was developed from local, national, and international falls clinical guidelines.

RESULTS

One thousand and twenty-seven patients presented following a fall throughout 2020. One hundred and seven patient medical records were audited. Assessment of cognition (94%), medication review (76%) and use of a falls risk screen (76%) were commonly completed. Under half of the patients had a documented gait evaluation (40%) and review of vision (18%). Concordance with guideline care was more likely for older patients (p = 0.042), with higher levels of comorbidity (p = 0.013), who required care assistance (p = 0.008) and received treatment from a multidisciplinary team (p < 0.001) in an observation ward (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with increased comorbidities and higher care needs had more falls guideline care recommendations documented. This was likely to occur when patients were moved to the observation ward where more comprehensive care by a multidisciplinary team could occur.

The Effects of Post-Acute Care in Patients with Heart Failure in Taiwan: A Single Center Experience

Background

The National Health Insurance Administration in Taiwan has promoted the heart failure post-acute care (HF-PAC) program as a means to provide proactive integrated care within the optimal treatment timeframe to enhance functional recovery after acute decompensated heart failure (HF).

Objectives

The aim of this program was to reduce HF readmission rates, improved medication prescription rates, and improve the quality of life in HF patients.

Methods

Patients who had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 40% were included and followed up for 6 months after discharge. They underwent cardiac rehabilitation and physiological, and nutritional status evaluations. The main clinical outcomes of the HF-PAC program were guideline-directed medical therapy prescription rate and 6-month readmission rate.

Results

A total of 122 patients were recruited from June 2018 to December 2020 at a medical center in southern Taiwan. The patients' activities of daily living, nutritional status, quality of life and LVEF were significantly improved during the HF-PAC program. More than 95% of the patients received guideline-directed medical prescriptions at the end of the HF-PAC program. The cardiovascular-related 6-month re-admission rate after the HF-PAC program ended was 27.7%, and it could be predicted by the New York Health Association functional class [hazard ratio (HR) 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 4.12 (1.36-12.46)], value of the Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form [HR (95% CI) = 0.46 (0.31-0.68)] and LVEF [HR (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.91-0.99)].

Conclusions

By incorporating multidisciplinary healthcare teams, the HF-PAC program improves the guideline- directed medical therapy prescription rate, thus improving patients' cardiac function, physical activity recovery, the quality of life, and also reduces their readmission rate.

[Interdisciplinary extremity board in the treatment of complex injuries]

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary case conferences are well-established in the field of oncology in order to provide the best possible treatment for patients with complex disease patterns which overlap several disciplines.

METHODS

After studying the available literature the aims, indications, frequency, patient enrolment and documentation modalities, disciplines necessary to create the reconstruction plan and evaluation parameters of the board, were agreed in an interdisciplinary discussion among colleagues. The utilization of the extremity board and demographic features of the cases presented in the extremity board within the first 6 months were subsequently descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

The agreed primary aim of an extremity board is the timely and transparent preparation of a high-quality holistic reconstruction plan for optimized treatment of a challenging patient collective with complex injuries of the extremities. Decisive interfaces of an extremity board are the participation of interdisciplinary disciplines, established enrolment and documentation modalities and a longitudinal analysis of parameters of the acute medical treatment, the long-term function and quality of life of those affected. The patient collective so far mostly includes men under 40 years old with traumatic soft tissue defects and combined injuries. On average, reconstruction plans for 1-2 patients were approved in an interdisciplinary team per session.

CONCLUSION

The extremity board serves as a platform for coordinated planning of treatment for patients with complex injuries. The limited personnel and time resources represent the greatest challenge for the successful implementation. The extremity board enables a high degree of interdisciplinary networking. The digital registration and documentation modality within the internal hospital documentation system is of utmost relevance. The preparation of the reconstruction plan is of decisive importance for the qualitative success of treatment and the restoration of function. The longitudinal analysis of appropriate parameters is imperative to measure the quality of treatment.

Collaborative dietetic and psychological care in Interprofessional Enhanced Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for adults with Anorexia Nervosa: a novel treatment approach

Clinical practice guidelines for anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical anorexia nervosa recommend treatment from a team including a mental health professional and a dietitian. To date, however, AN treatment models such as Enhanced Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT-E) seldom include dietitians and have low to moderate treatment efficacy. Given interprofessional approaches to healthcare have been shown to improve treatment outcomes and enhance patient and clinician satisfaction, formalising collaborative dietetic and psychological treatment may be a feasible strategy to improve treatment outcomes and the patient and clinician experience of treatment. Moreover, malnutrition is a serious consequence of AN, and dietitians are considered experts in its diagnosis and treatment. This paper proposes a novel treatment approach, Interprofessional Enhanced Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT-IE), an adaptation of CBT-E where dietitians deliver content related to malnutrition and dietary restraint and mental health professionals deliver content related to cognitive and behavioural change. The rationale for developing CBT-IE, treatment structure, and future research directions is discussed.

Prevention and screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative findings from the BETTER WISE project

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare systems worldwide and disrupted primary care, particularly prevention, screening, and lifestyle counselling. BETTER WISE is a comprehensive and structured approach that proactively addresses cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS), including cancer survivorship and screening for poverty and lifestyle risks for patients aged 40 to 65. Patients from 13 primary care clinics (urban, rural, and remote) in Alberta, Ontario, and Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada were invited for a 1-hour visit with a prevention practitioner (PP), a member of the primary care team with specialized training in CCDPS to provide patients an overview of eligible screening and assist with lifestyle counselling. This qualitative sub-study describes how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted BETTER WISE in a constantly changing medical landscape.

METHODS

We conducted 17 focus groups and 48 key informant interviews with a total of 132 primary care providers (PPs, physicians, allied health professionals, and clinic staff) over three different time points to better understand their perspectives on the BETTER WISE project. We also received 585 patient feedback forms of the 1005 patients who agreed to participate in the study. We also collected field notes and memos and employed thematic analysis using a constant comparative method focused on the impact of the pandemic on BETTER WISE.

RESULTS

We identified four themes related to how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the BETTER WISE study: 1) Switch of in-person visits to visits over the phone; 2) Lack of access to preventive care and delays of screening tests; 3) Changes in primary care providers' availability and priorities; 4) Mental health impacts of the pandemic on patients and primary care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic had and, at the time of writing, continues to have an impact on primary care, particularly on prevention, screening, and lifestyle counselling. Despite structural, procedural, and personal challenges throughout different waves of the pandemic, the primary care clinics participating in BETTER WISE were able to complete the study. Our results underscore the importance of the role of primary care providers in adapting to changing circumstances and support of patients in these challenging times.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This qualitative study is a sub-component of the BETTER WISE pragmatic, cRCT, trial registration ISRCTN21333761 (date of registration 19/12/2016).

Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of EHR-facilitated collaborative symptom control in cancer (E2C2): addendum

We previously described the hypotheses, outcomes, design, and analysis for E2C2, a pragmatic stepped-wedge trial to assess an intervention to improve symptom control in patients with cancer. Subsequent consideration of the design and cohort led to the addition of a second primary hypothesis. This article describes and presents the rationale for this second hypothesis. This addendum also details a revised analytic approach, necessitated by inconsistencies in the original analytic plan. The design, outcomes, and other aspects of the protocol remain unchanged.

Radiologic-pathologic correlation of lesions in resected liver specimens with an ex vivo MRI-compatible localization device

OBJECTIVE

Liver lesion characterization is limited by the lack of an established gold standard for precise correlation of radiologic characteristics with their histologic features. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of using an ex vivo MRI-compatible sectioning device for radiologic-pathologic co-localization of lesions in resected liver specimens.

METHODS

In this prospective feasibility study, adults undergoing curative partial hepatectomy from February 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled. Gadoxetic acid was administered intraoperatively prior to hepatic vascular inflow ligation. Liver specimens were stabilized in an MRI-compatible acrylic lesion localization device (27 × 14 × 14 cm3) featuring slicing channels and a silicone gel 3D matrix. High-resolution 3D T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient echo and 3D T2-weighted fast-spin-echo images were acquired using a single channel quadrature head coil. Radiologic lesion coordinates guided pathologic sectioning. A final histopathologic diagnosis was prepared for all lesions. The proportion of successfully co-localized lesions was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 57 lesions were identified radiologically and sectioned in liver specimens from 10 participants with liver metastases (n = 8), primary biliary mucinous cystic neoplasm (n = 1), and hepatic adenomatosis (n = 1). Of these, 38 lesions (67%) were < 1 cm. Overall, 52/57 (91%) of radiologically identified lesions were identified pathologically using the device. Of these, 5 lesions (10%) were not initially identified on gross examination but were confirmed histologically using MRI-guided localization. One lesion was identified grossly but not on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of a clinical method for image-guided co-localization and histological characterization of liver lesions using an ex vivo MRI-compatible sectioning device.

KEY POINTS

• The ex vivo MRI-compatible sectioning device provides a reliable method for radiologic-pathologic correlation of small (< 1 cm) liver lesions in human liver specimens. • The sectioning method can be feasibly implemented within a clinical practice setting and used in future efforts to study liver lesion characterization. • Intraoperative administration of gadoxetic acid results in enhancement in ex vivo MRI images of liver specimens hours later with excellent image quality.

Design, methods, and recruitment outcomes of the Veterans' Pain Care Organizational Improvement Comparative Effectiveness (VOICE) study

The Veterans' Pain Care Organizational Improvement Comparative Effectiveness (VOICE) study is a 12-month pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial conducted at ten United States Veterans Affairs (VA) health care sites. The overall goal was to test interventions to improve pain while reducing opioid use among VA patients with moderate-severe chronic pain despite treatment with long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Aims were 1) to compare lower-intensity telecare collaborative pain management (TCM) versus higher-intensity integrated pain team management (IPT), and 2) to test the option of switching to buprenorphine (versus no option) in a high-dose subgroup. Recruitment challenges included secular trends in opioid prescribing and the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were recruited over 3.5 years. Of 6966 potentially eligible patients, 4731 (67.9%) were contacted for telephone eligibility interview; of those contacted, 3398 (71.8%) declined participation, 359 (7.6%) were ineligible, 821 (24.2%) enrolled, and 820 (24.1%) were randomized. The most common reason for declining was satisfaction with pain care (n = 731). The most common reason for ineligibility was not having moderate-severe chronic pain (n = 110). Compared with the potentially eligible population, randomized participants were slightly younger, more often female, had similar prescribed opioids, and had similar or higher rates of pain and mental health diagnoses. The enrolled patient number was lower than the original target, but sufficient to power planned analyses. In conclusion, the VOICE trial enrolled a diverse sample similar to the population of VA patients receiving LTOT. Results will add substantially to limited existing evidence for interventions to improve pain while reducing opioid use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03026790.

Effectiveness of the chronic care model for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mixed evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) with patient outcomes. The aim of this review is to examine the effectiveness of CCM interventions on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), LDL cholesterol and body mass index (BMI) among primary care adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 to June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CCM interventions against usual care among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care with HbA1c, SBP, DBP, LDL cholesterol and BMI as outcomes. An abbreviated search was performed from 2021 to April 2022. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data extraction and Cochrane risk of bias assessment. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. Heterogeneity was evaluated using χ2 and I2 test statistics. Overall effects were evaluated using Z statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies involving 16485 patients were identified. Most studies had low risks of bias. Meta-analysis of all 17 studies revealed that CCM interventions significantly decreased HbA1c levels compared to usual care, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.21%, 95% CI -0.30, -0.13; Z = 5.07, p<0.00001. Larger effects were experienced among adults with baseline HbA1c ≥8% (MD -0.36%, 95% CI -0.51, -0.21; Z = 5.05, p<0.00001) and when four or more CCM elements were present in the interventions (MD -0.25%, 95% CI -0.35, -0.15; Z = 4.85, p<0.00001). Interventions with CCM decreased SBP (MD -2.93 mmHg, 95% CI -4.46, -1.40, Z = 3.75, p=0.0002) and DBP (MD -1.35 mmHg, 95% CI -2.05, -0.65, Z = 3.79, p=0.0002) compared to usual care but there was no impact on LDL cholesterol levels or BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

CCM interventions, compared to usual care, improve glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care, with greater reductions when the mean baseline HbA1c is ≥8% and with interventions containing four or more CCM elements.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO  CRD42021273959.

Characterizing intensive care unit rounding teams using meta-data from the electronic health record

PURPOSE

Teamwork is an important determinant of outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU), yet the nature of individual ICU teams remains poorly understood. We examined whether meta-data in the form of digital signatures in the electronic health record (EHR) could be used to identify and characterize ICU teams.

METHODS

We analyzed EHR data from 27 ICUs over one year. We linked intensivist physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists to individual patients based on selected EHR meta-data. We then characterized ICU teams by their members' overall past experience and shared past experience; and used network analysis to characterize ICUs by their network's density and centralization.

RESULTS

We identified 2327 unique providers and 30,892 unique care teams. Teams varied based on their average team member experience (median and total range: 262.2 shifts, 9.0-706.3) and average shared experience (median and total range: 13.2 shared shifts, 1.0-99.3). ICUs varied based on their network's density (median and total range: 0.12, 0.07-0.23), degree centralization (0.50, 0.35-0.65) and closeness centralization (0.45, 0.11-0.60). In a regression analysis, this variation was only partially explained by readily observable ICU characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

EHR meta-data can assist in the characterization of ICU teams, potentially providing novel insight into strategies to measure and improve team function in critical care.

Identifying Situational Awareness Behaviors in Trauma Teams; a Nominal Group Technique Study

Introduction

Situational awareness (SA), as a nontechnical human factor, is critical to the success of a trauma team. This study aimed to identify representatives of behaviors supporting (desirable) and diminishing (undesirable) SA for trauma teams while performing the initial assessment of multi-trauma patients.

Methods

This Nominal Group Technique Study was conducted on twenty attending physicians from various specialties affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, who were invited to a nominal group technique meeting in 2020. Participants were asked to write down their proposed behaviors in silence. Subsequently, each participant shared their list with the group in a round-robin format, and clarifications were made through discussion. After categorizing the ideas, we asked participants to rate each behavior's importance on a five-point Likert scale. The consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement on a rating of 4 and 5.

Results

The final SA behaviors for the trauma team consisted of 29 (22 desirable and 7 undesirable) behaviors arranged in seven dimensions: resource allocation, anticipate and plan, avoid fixation errors, call for help if needed, prioritize attention, reassess patient, and shared mental model. The most important desirable and undesirable behaviors were identified in resource allocation (n=8) and avoid fixation errors (n=7) dimensions, respectively. Resource allocation behaviors consist of 'checking necessary equipment', 'allocating an alternative person(s) to do the required task if needed', 'assigning tasks to the right person(s)', and 'Addressing each team member with a requested task'. Avoid fixation errors behaviors were 'insisting on performing the procedure', 'making decisions without considering all available information', and 'emphasizing others' expertise in the diagnostic process'.

Conclusion

The proposed team SA behaviors may be used in assessing the trauma team performance and training program to promote trauma team SA.

Plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: a narrative review

In this narrative review, we discuss the relevant issues of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in critically ill patients. For many conditions, the optimal indication, device type, frequency, duration, type of replacement fluid and criteria for stopping TPE are uncertain. TPE is a potentially lifesaving but also invasive procedure with risk of adverse events and complications and requires close monitoring by experienced teams. In the intensive care unit (ICU), the indications for TPE can be divided into (1) absolute, well-established, and evidence-based, for which TPE is recognized as first-line therapy, (2) relative, for which TPE is a recognized second-line treatment (alone or combined) and (3) rescue therapy, where TPE is used with a limited or theoretical evidence base. New indications are emerging and ongoing knowledge gaps, notably regarding the use of TPE during critical illness, support the establishment of a TPE registry dedicated to intensive care medicine.

Efficacy of geriatric multidisciplinary oncology clinic in the surgical treatment decision-making process for frail elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Purpose

Multidisciplinary care has become a cornerstone of colorectal cancer management. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a geriatric multidisciplinary oncology clinic (GMOC), we analyzed the surgical treatment decision-making process and outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study reviewed the data of patients aged ≥65 years who participated in the GMOC at a tertiary referral hospital between 2015 and 2021. The clinical adherence rate, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and a multidimensional frailty score (MFS) were obtained. The groups that were recommended and not recommended for surgery were compared, analyzing the factors impacting the decision and 1-year survival outcomes. Furthermore, the postoperative complications of patients who underwent surgery were evaluated.

Results

A total of 165 patients visited the GMOC, and 74 had colorectal cancer (mean age, 85.5 years [range, 81.2–89.0 years]). Among patients with systemic disease (n = 31), 7 were recommended for surgery, and 5 underwent surgery. Among patients with locoregional disease (n = 43), 18 were recommended for surgery, and 12 underwent surgery. Patients recommended and not recommended for surgery had significantly different activities of daily living (ADL) (P = 0.024), instrumental ADL (P = 0.001), Mini-Mental State Examination (P = 0.014), delirium risk (P = 0.039), and MFS (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the 1-year overall survival between the 2 groups (P = 0.980). Of the 17 patients who underwent surgery, the median (interquartile range) of operation time was 165.0 minutes (120.0–270.0 minutes); hospital stay, 7.0 days (6.0–8.0 days); and 3 patients had wound complications.

Conclusion

Proper counseling of patients through the GMOC could lead to appropriate management and favorable outcomes.

Engaging with ethnic minority consumers to improve safety in cancer services: A national stakeholder analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ethnic minority populations are often exposed to healthcare-associated harm. There is little evidence about whether current patient engagement interventions are relevant. We conducted a national analysis of existing approaches amongst stakeholders in cancer care.

METHODS

Five online focus groups were conducted with 24 participants from consumer and health organisations across the Australian cancer system. Case studies depicting common methods of healthcare engagement to improve patient safety were developed and used to explore the suitability of current methods. Data were analysed thematically using the framework method.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified: 1) sociocultural foundations of consumer engagement; 2) principles for adaptation; and 3) integration and implementation into cancer services. Sociocultural beliefs about cancer were considered to influence suitability. Adaptation may include multichannel methods, visual modalities and culturally specific content. Health system capacity, cultural competence of health service providers and consumer-led co-development were identified as critical to successful implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing engagement strategies are not completely suitable for ethnic minority populations nor feasible for implementation within cancer services.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Healthcare services must work with ethnic minority populations to understand if and how underpinning beliefs influence engagement with cancer services. A range of tangible techniques may enhance the suitability of existing interventions.

Good working relationships: how healthcare system proximity influences trust between healthcare workers

Trust between healthcare workers is a fundamental component of effective, interprofessional collaboration and teamwork. However, little is known about how this trust is built, particularly when healthcare workers are distributed (i.e., not co-located and lack a shared electronic health record). We interviewed 39 healthcare workers who worked with proximal and distributed colleagues to care for patients with diabetic foot ulcers and analyzed transcripts using content analysis. Generally, building trust was a process that occurred over time, starting with an introduction and proceeding through iterative cycles of communication and working together to coordinate care for shared patients. Proximal, compared to distributed, dyads had more options available for interactions which, in turn, facilitated communication and working together to build trust. Distributed healthcare workers found it more difficult to develop trusting relationships and relied heavily on individual initiative to do so. Few effective tools existed at the level of interprofessional collaborations, teams, or broader healthcare systems to support trust between distributed healthcare workers. With increasing use of distributed interprofessional collaborations and teams, future efforts should focus on fostering this critical attribute.

Distress management in cancer patients：Guideline implementation based on CAN-IMPLEMENT

Objective

To standardize the distress management of gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, the adapted Cancer-related Distress Management Guidelines were implemented in nursing practice among gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy based on A Guideline Adaptation and Implementation Planning Resource (CAN-IMPLEMENT).

Methods

Based on the theoretical framework of CAN-IMPLEMENT, A multidisciplinary team was established, barriers and facilitators obstacles of guidelines implementation in medical oncology units were assessed, corresponding solutions were formulated, the guidelines implementation process was monitored, and implementation results were evaluated.

Results

The multidisciplinary team developed review criteria, standardized work paths, assessment tools, training manuals for healthcare professionals, education manuals for patients and their caregivers. After guidelines implementation, the completion rate of the distress management record came up to 97.9% (189/193). From September 2017 to December 2018, the compliance of medical staff on most items in the audit checklist was improved, ranging from 57.1% (100/175) to 100.0% (193/193). The positive distress rate of gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was decreased from 22.7% (32/141) to 9.3% (18/193) (P < 0.05), and the Median (range) of the distress score declined from 2 (0-9) to 0 (0-7) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The implementation of guidelines based on CAN-IMPLEMENT promotes the establishment of a distress management system in the medical oncology units. The review standards, standardized work paths, and evaluation tools for distress in cancer patients formulated by the multidisciplinary team had clinical applicability and effectiveness. Quality control in the practice of distress management was effective. The compliance of healthcare professionals with distress management was improved. The distress of gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy was alleviated effectively.

A framework to support the progressive implementation of integrated team-based care for the management of COPD: a collective case study

Background

In Canada, there is widespread agreement about the need for integrated models of team-based care. However, there is less agreement on how to support the scale-up and spread of successful models, and there is limited empirical evidence to support this process in chronic disease management. We studied the supporting and mitigating factors required to successfully implement and scale-up an integrated model of team-based care in primary care.

Methods

We conducted a collective case study using multiple methods of data collection including interviews, document analysis, living documents, and a focus group. Our study explored a team-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) known as Best Care COPD (BCC) that has been implemented in primary care settings across Southwestern Ontario. BCC is a quality improvement initiative that was developed to enhance the quality of care for patients with COPD. Participants included healthcare providers involved in the delivery of the BCC program.

Results

We identified several mechanisms influencing the scale-up and spread of BCC and categorized them as Foundational (e.g., evidence-based program, readiness to implement, peer-led implementation team), Transformative (adaptive process, empowerment and collaboration, embedded evaluation), and Enabling Mechanisms (provider training, administrative support, role clarity, patient outcomes). Based on these results, we developed a framework to inform the progressive implementation of integrated, team-based care for chronic disease management. Our framework builds off our empirical work and is framed by local contextual factors.

Conclusions

This study explores the implementation and spread of integrated team-based care in a primary care setting. Despite the study’s focus on COPD, we believe the findings can be applied in other chronic disease contexts. We provide a framework to support the progressive implementation of integrated team-based care for chronic disease management.

Impact of an addiction medicine consult team intervention in a Canadian inner city hospital on acute care utilization: a pragmatic quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Inner city patients have a higher illness burden and need for care, but experience more unmet care needs. Hospital Addiction Medicine Consult Teams (AMCTs) are a promising emerging intervention. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a Canadian AMCT-like intervention for inner city patients on reduction in high emergency department (ED) use, hospital admission, and inpatient length of stay.

METHODS

Using a community-engaged, two-arm, pre-post, longitudinal quasi-experimental study design, 572 patients reporting active substance use, unstable housing, unstable income, or a combination thereof (302 at intervention site, 270 at control sites) were enrolled. Survey and administrative health service data were collected at baseline, six months post-enrolment, and 12 months post-enrolment. Multivariable regression models tested the intervention effect, adjusting for clinically important covariables (inpatient status at enrolment, medical complexity, age, gender, Indigenous identity, shelter use, opioid use).

RESULTS

Initial bivariable analyses demonstrated an intervention effect on reduction in admissions and length of stay, however, this effect was no longer significant after adjusting for covariables. There was no evidence of reduction in high ED use on either bivariable or subsequent multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for covariables, no AMCT intervention effect was detected for reduction in high ED use, inpatient admission, or hospital length of stay. Further research is recommended to assess other patient-oriented intervention outcomes.

Association of care by a non-medical intensive care unit provider team with outcomes of medically critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of boarding of critically ill medical patients on non-medical intensive care unit (ICU) provider teams with outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

ICUs in a tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients with medical critical illness.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared outcomes for critically ill medical patients admitted to a non-medical specialty ICU team (April 1 - August 30, 2020) with those admitted to the medical ICU team (January 1, 2018 - March 31, 2020). The primary outcome was hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospital disposition for survivors. Our cohort consisted of 1241 patients admitted to the medical ICU team and 230 admitted to non-medical ICU teams. Unadjusted hospital mortality (medical ICU, 38.8% vs non-medical ICU, 42.2%, p = 0.33) and hospital LOS (7.4 vs 7.4 days, p = 0.96) were similar between teams. Among survivors, more non-medical ICU team patients were discharged home (72.6% vs 82.0%, p = 0.024). After multivariable adjustment, we found no difference in mortality, LOS, or home discharge between teams. However, among hospital survivors, admission to a non-medical ICU team was associated with a longer LOS (regression coefficient [95% CI] for log-transformed hospital LOS: 0.23 [0.05,0.40], p = 0.022). Certain subgroups-patients aged 50-64 years (odds-ratio [95% CI]: 4.22 [1.84,9.65], p = 0.001), with ≤10 comorbidities (0-5: 2.78 (1.11,6.95], p = 0.029; 6-10: 6.61 [1.38,31.71], p = 0.018), without acute respiratory failure (1.97 [1.20,3.23], p = 0.008)-had higher mortality when admitted to non-medical ICU teams.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no association between admission to non-medical ICU team and mortality for medically critically ill patients. However, survivors experienced longer hospital LOS when admitted to non-medical ICU teams. Middle-aged patients, those with low comorbidity burden, and those without respiratory failure had higher mortality when admitted to non-medical ICU teams.