Estimating long-term health risks after breast cancer radiotherapy: merging evidence from low and high doses

In breast cancer radiotherapy, substantial radiation exposure of organs other than the treated breast cannot be avoided, potentially inducing second primary cancer or heart disease. While distant organs and large parts of nearby ones receive doses in the mGy-Gy range, small parts of the heart, lung and bone marrow often receive doses as high as 50 Gy. Contemporary treatment planning allows for considerable flexibility in the distribution of this exposure. To optimise treatment with regards to long-term health risks, evidence-based risk estimates are required for the entire broad range of exposures. Here, we thus propose an approach that combines data from medical and epidemiological studies with different exposure conditions. Approximating cancer induction as a local process, we estimate organ cancer risks by integrating organ-specific dose-response relationships over the organ dose distributions. For highly exposed organ parts, specific high-dose risk models based on studies with medical exposure are applied. For organs or their parts receiving relatively low doses, established dose-response models based on radiation-epidemiological data are used. Joining the models in the intermediate dose range leads to a combined, in general non-linear, dose response supported by data over the whole relevant dose range. For heart diseases, a linear model consistent with high- and low-dose studies is presented. The resulting estimates of long-term health risks are largely compatible with rate ratios observed in randomised breast cancer radiotherapy trials. The risk models have been implemented in a software tool PASSOS that estimates long-term risks for individual breast cancer patients.

Assessment of patients' cumulative doses in one year and collective dose to population through CT examinations

PURPOSE

To estimate percentage of patients undergoing multiple CT exams leading to cumulative effective dose (CED) of more than 25, 50, 75 and 100 mSv in one year and assess per capita and the collective effective dose.

METHODS

Data from a regional hospital network was collected retrospectively using radiation dose monitoring system at 6 facilities with 8 CT scanners. The data was analyzed to find number of patients in different dose groups, their age, gender, number of CT exams and exams needed to reach 100 mSv based on age groups.

RESULTS

In one year 43,010 patients underwent 75,252 CT examinations. The number of exams per 1000 population was 153. Further 27% of the patients were younger than 55- years and 15.9% of them were younger than 45-year-old. A total of 0.67% of patients received a CED > 100 mSv; 3.5% had CED > 50 mSv, 11.9% with CED > 25 mSv and the maximum CED was 529 mSv. The minimum time to reach 100 mSv was a single CT exam. Seven patients received > 100 mSv in a single CT exam. 0.36% of patients had 10 or more CT exams in one year and 3.8% had 5 or more CT exams. The mean CED was 12.3 mSv, the average individual effective dose was 1.1 mSv and the collective effective dose was 521.3 person-Sv.

CONCLUSIONS

The alarming high CED received by large number of patients and with high collective dose to population requires urgent actions by all stake holders in the best interest of patient radiation safety.

Radiation exposure to infants undergoing voiding cystourethrography: The importance of the digital imaging technology

PURPOSE

To determine the radiation burden to infants undergoing voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in a single institution and investigate the effect of shifting from analogue to digital imaging that allowed the use of a radiography-free examination protocol.

METHODS

Anthropometric and exposure data were prospectively collected for 35 consecutive infants undergoing VCUG on a digital system with a standardized examination protocol not including radiographs. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to determine entrance-skin dose. Monte Carlo simulations and patient-specific anthropomorphic phantoms were employed to determine organ/tissue doses and effective dose (ED). The associated theoretical risk of radiation-induced cancer was determined and compared to the nominal risk of cancer induction. The radiation burden from VCUG on a modern digital system with a contemporary examination protocol was compared to corresponding data reported previously for an analogue system in the same institution.

RESULTS

The median ED from VCUG was found 47 μSv. The associated total life attributable risk of radiation-induced cancer was found 10x10^-6 and 13x10^-6 for boys and girls, respectively. VCUG was found to increase the nominal risk of cancer by a factor of 1.000025 in boys and 1.000034 in girls. Shifting from analogue to digital imaging system resulted in 89% reduction of the radiation burden from VCUG.

CONCLUSION

The theoretical radiation risks for infants undergoing VCUG using a modern digital imaging system and a radiography-free protocol were found to be minor. The transition from analogue to digital equipment resulted in considerable reduction of the radiation burden from VCUG.

Let Chromosomes Speak: The Cytogenetics Project at the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC)

Hibakusha (atomic bomb survivors) are "witnesses" of the atomic bombings, not just in a standard sense but also in the instrumental sense. For medical and scientific experts, hibakusha are biological resources of unparalleled scientific value. Over the past seventy years, the hibakusha bodies have narrated what it means to be exposed to radiation. In this paper, I explore studies at the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (ABCC) that examined hibakusha bodies as sites where risk could be read. I focus on a period from the mid-1950s to 1975, during which new methods, practices, and technologies allowed ABCC scientists to investigate chromosomes as a way to study radiation exposure and human risk. By focusing on chromosomal aberrations, ABCC scientists connected their work directly to the emerging infrastructure for radiobiology at the time. ABCC administrators actively sought out such prestige, especially given their relationship with the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). The shift in approach would also alleviate some public relations problems with which the institution was struggling. Launching a cytogenetics program required some older practices that had assumed American privilege and dominance to be abandoned. Eventually, the decision to let chromosomes speak of radiation exposure brought about fundamental changes in ABCC, which came to symbolize the model for future studies at the organization, especially as ABCC was transitioning to a US-Japan binational organization. More broadly, this case highlights the intricate scientific negotiation of radiation risk where uncertainties necessarily prevail.

Computed tomography colonography and radiation risk: How low can we go?

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) has become a key examination in detecting colonic polyps and colorectal carcinoma (CRC). It is particularly useful after incomplete optical colonoscopy (OC) for patients with sedation risks and patients anxious about the risks or potential discomfort associated with OC. CTC's main advantages compared with OC are its non-invasive nature, better patient compliance, and the ability to assess the extracolonic disease. Despite these advantages, ionizing radiation remains the most significant burden of CTC. This opinion review comprehensively addresses the radiation risk of CTC, incorporating imaging technology refinements such as automatic tube current modulation, filtered back projections, lowering the tube voltage, and iterative reconstructions as tools for optimizing low and ultra-low dose protocols of CTC. Future perspectives arise from integrating artificial intelligence in computed tomography machines for the screening of CRC.

Risk perception of radiation emergency medical staff on low-dose radiation exposure: Knowledge is a critical factor

Radiation emergency medical (REM) staff respond to many types of disasters such as radiological and nuclear accidents as well as environmental radioactivity exposure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk perception of REM staff on radiation exposure in various situations and to analyze the factors that affect their risk perception. A questionnaire was given to 284 REM staff affiliated with various organizations, including nuclear power generation, nuclear fuel manufacturing, large-scale irradiation, and radiation-waste disposal facilities, as well as research and development institutions. To determine the substantially influential factors for risk perception, we analyzed the questionnaire responses using ordinal logistic regression, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation analyses. It was generally perceived by REM staff that low-dose radiation exposure in daily life and work environments does not pose any health risks. A higher level of radiation knowledge was tightly associated with a lower risk perception of REM staff on extremely low-dose (several mSv) radiation exposure, thus exhibiting an inverse correlation. In contrast to radiation researchers, the work experience of REM staff was not a contributing factor to their risk perception. In our study, REM staff with a high level of radiation knowledge did not have any health concerns in their work environments. Efforts to enhance the radiation knowledge of REM staff through proper education and training would result in analytical risk evaluation, which may also improve their willingness to help meet surge capacity needs in large-scale radiological events.

Multivariate statistical approach on distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides and associated radiation indices along the north-western coastline of Aegean Sea, Greece

A comprehensive radiological survey using multivariate statistical analysis was carried out to evaluate the distribution of ⁴⁰K, ²³²Th, ²²⁶Ra, ²³⁵U, and ¹³⁷Cs, and associated radiation indices in beach sand samples of the coastal area of the Aegean Sea. The activity concentration of selected radionuclides was measured and no clue of recent migration of radiocaesium by not only precipitation but also through an indirect way, such as ocean runoff, was found. As part of radiological risk assessment, external radiation hazard index, radium equivalent activity, effective dose, and absorbed dose rate were estimated. Pearson correlation, cluster, and PCA analysis were used by processing observed radiological parameters to determine the correlation between the radiological parameters and locations. Pearson correlation shows a strong association between all parameters and activity of ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th. A spatial distribution map was provided to a distinct visual representation of the distribution of radionuclide contents in the study area.

Mortality among individuals exposed to atomic bomb radiation in utero: 1950-2012

We examined the mortality risks among 2463 individuals who were exposed in utero to atomic bomb radiation in Hiroshima or Nagasaki in August 1945 and were followed from October 1950 through 2012. Individual estimates of mother's weighted absorbed uterine dose (DS02R1) were used. Poisson regression method was used to estimate the radiation-associated excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cause-specific mortality. Head size, birth weight, and parents' survival status were evaluated as potential mediators of radiation effect. There were 339 deaths (216 males and 123 females) including deaths from solid cancer (n = 137), lymphohematopoietic cancer (n = 8), noncancer disease (n = 134), external cause (n = 56), and unknown cause (n = 4). Among males, the unadjusted ERR/Gy (95% CI) was increased for noncancer disease mortality (1.22, 0.10-3.14), but not for solid cancer mortality (- 0.18, < - 0.77-0.95); the unadjusted ERR/Gy for external cause mortality was not statistically significant (0.28, < - 0.60-2.36). Among females, the unadjusted ERRs/Gy were increased for solid cancer (2.24, 0.44-5.58), noncancer (2.86, 0.56-7.64), and external cause mortality (2.57, 0.20-9.19). The ERRs/Gy adjusted for potential mediators did not change appreciably for solid cancer mortality, but decreased notably for noncancer mortality (0.39, < - 0.43-1.91 for males; 1.48, - 0.046-4.55 for females) and external cause mortality (0.10, < - 0.57-1.96 for males; 1.38, < - 0.46-5.95 for females). In conclusion, antenatal radiation exposure is a consistent risk factor for increased solid cancer mortality among females, but not among males. The effect of exposure to atomic bomb radiation on noncancer disease and external cause mortality among individuals exposed in utero was mediated through small head size, low birth weight, and parental loss.

Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks

Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic imaging. Specifically, this work seeks to estimate patient and occupational effective doses during urethrographic procedures at three radiology hospitals. Both staff and patient X-ray exposure levels were calculated in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), obtained by means of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100(LiF:Mg:Cu.P)) for 243 urethrographic examinations. Patient radiation effective doses per procedure were estimated using conversion factors obtained from the use of Public Health England computer software. In units of mGy, the median and range of ESAK per examination were found to be 10.8 (3.6-26.2), 7.0 (0.2-32.3), and 24.3 (9.0-32.0) in Hospitals A, B, and C, respectively. The overall mean and range of staff doses (in µGy) were found to be 310 (4.0-1750) per procedure. With the exception of hospital C, the present evaluations of radiation dose have been found to be similar to those of previously published research. The wide range of patient and staff doses illustrate the need for radiation dose optimisation.

Eye lens and thyroid gland radiation exposure for patients undergoing brain computed tomography examination

This study aims to estimate the effective radiation dose and organ dose from head CT procedures. It was conducted in three main private hospitals in Khartoum State-Sudan, using Toshiba machines with 64 slices. The total number of patients included in this study was 142 patients (82 males and 60 females). The effective dose and organ dose were calculated by CT Expo software. The effective dose slightly varied among patients according to gender and age. The effective dose for female patients (5.99 mSv) was higher than that for male patients (5.84 mSv), and the pediatric dose (5.46 mSv) was lower than the adults' dose (5.94 mSv). The dose for eye lens was found lower for male patients (89.117 mSv) than the dose for female patients (94.62) mSv). According to patients' age: the dose received by the lens of the eye was much lower in pediatric (79.93 mSv) than the adults (92.41 mSv). The dose for thyroid in female patients (33.52 mSv) was higher than the male patients (28 mSv). The pediatric dose (28.34 mSv) was lower than the adults' dose (30.64 mSv). Departmental imaging protocol and lack of training among hospital staff are expected to be responsible for these variations. Therefore, this study recommends that the CT technologists be trained on suitable strategies to achieve dose optimization. Moreover, patients' doses must be monitored regularly.

Radiation risk for patients undergoing cardiac computed tomography examinations

The various technological advancements in computed tomography (CT) have resulted in remarkable growth in the use of CT imaging in clinical practice, not the least of which has been its establishment as the most valuable imaging examination for the assessment of cardiovascular system disorders. The objective of this study was to assess the effective radiation dose and radiation risk for patients during cardiac CT procedures, based on studies from four different hospitals equipped with 128 slice CT equipment. A total of eighty-three patients were investigated in this study with different clinical indications. Effective doses were also calculated using software based on Monte Carlo simulation. The mean patient age (years), weight (kg), and body mass index (BMI (kg/m²)) were 49 ± 11, 82 ± 12, and 31 ± 6, respectively. The results of the study revealed that the tube voltage (kVp) and tube current-exposure time product (mAs) ranged between 100 to 140 and 50 to 840 respectively. The overall average patient dose values for the volume CT dose index [(CTDI_vol), in mGy)] and dose length product (DLP) (in mGy·cm) were 34.8 ± 15 (3.7-117.0) and 383.8 ± 354 (46.0-3277.0) respectively. The average effective dose (mSv) was 15.2 ± 8 (1.2-61.8). The radiation dose values showed wide variation between different hospitals and even within the same hospital. The results indicate the need to optimize radiation dose and to establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), also to harmonize the imaging protocols to ensure reduced radiation risk.

ProZES: the methodology and software tool for assessment of assigned share of radiation in probability of cancer occurrence

ProZES is a software tool for estimating the probability that a given cancer was caused by preceding exposure to ionising radiation. ProZES calculates this probability, the assigned share, for solid cancers and hematopoietic malignant diseases, in cases of exposures to low-LET radiation, and for lung cancer in cases of exposure to radon. User-specified inputs include birth year, sex, type of diagnosed cancer, age at diagnosis, radiation exposure history and characteristics, and smoking behaviour for lung cancer. Cancer risk models are an essential part of ProZES. Linking disease and exposure to radiation involves several methodological aspects, and assessment of uncertainties received particular attention. ProZES systematically uses the principle of multi-model inference. Models of radiation risk were either newly developed or critically re-evaluated for ProZES, including dedicated models for frequent types of cancer and, for less common diseases, models for groups of functionally similar cancer sites. The low-LET models originate mostly from the study of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Risks predicted by these models are adjusted to be applicable to the population of Germany and to different time periods. Adjustment factors for low dose rates and for a reduced risk during the minimum latency time between exposure and cancer are also applied. The development of the methodology and software was initiated and supported by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) taking up advice by the German Commission on Radiological Protection (SSK, Strahlenschutzkommission). These provide the scientific basis to support decision making on compensation claims regarding malignancies following occupational exposure to radiation in Germany.

Estimation of various radiological parameters associated with radioactive contents emanating with fly ash from Sahiwal coal-fuelled power plant, Pakistan

The release of natural radioactive materials with the emission of fly ash as a result of coal burning in power generation plants is considered amongst the sources that elevate the technologically environmental radioactivity level. This research mainly concerns the assessment of various radiological parameters including excess lifetime cancer risk due to natural radioactive contents associated with fly ash emitted to the surrounding environment from the stack of 1320 Mw Sahiwal coal-fuelled power generation plant (CFPP). For this purpose, fifty-four soil samples were collected in a radius of 4 Km from CFPP and a highly background radiation-shielded HPGe system is used to measure radioactivity in the collected samples. The activity concentrations of radium-226, potassium-40, and thorium-232 in collected samples was found to be in the range of 20 to 138, 43 to 860, and 27 to 127 Bq/kg with average values of 66, 409, and 67 Bq/kg respectively. Activity concentrations of radium-226 and thorium-232 were observed significantly higher than UNSCEAR reported typical global average values. A significant decrease in the level of the aforementioned radionuclides in the collected soil samples was observed with increasing distance from the power plant, which is a clear indication for the elevation of radioactivity concentrations in the surrounding environment as a result of the operation of the CFPP. To assess the radiation dose delivered to the occupational workers and inhabitants living next to Sahiwal CFPP, absorbed γ-dose rate (D_γ), outdoor annual effective dose rate (E_Outdoor), and excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) were estimated and these were found higher than the UNSCEAR recommended values of 59 nGy/h, 0.07 mSv/y, and 2.9 × 10^-4 respectively. The outcome of this first systematic study is the assessment of potential radiological health risk to the occupational workers as well as the inhabitants living in the proximity of this CFPP.

Patients Radiation Risks from Computed Tomography Lymphography

Objectives:

This study aims to first measure patient doses during computed tomography (CT) chest, abdomen, and extremities procedures for evaluation lymphedema, and second to estimate the radiation dose-related risks during the procedures.

Material and Methods:

Radiation effective doses from CT lymphography procedures quantified using CT machines from different vendors. After the calibration of CT systems, the data collected for a total of 28 CT lymphography procedures. Effective and organ doses extrapolated using national radiological protection software based on Monte Carlo simulation.

Results:

The mean patient doses for chest and abdomen procedures in term of CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy.cm) are 10.0 ± 3 and 425 ± 222 and 24 ± 12 and 1118 ± 812 for CT 128 and CT 16 slice, respectively. The mean DLP (mGy.cm) for extremities was 320 ± 140 and 424 ± 212 for CT 128 and CT 16 slice, in that order.

Conclusion:

Patients’ dose showed significant differences due to variation in the scan length and clinical indication. Organs lay in the primary beam received high radiation doses especially in the chest region which increases the probability of radiation-induced cancer. The current patient’s doses are higher compared to the previous studies.

Do we really need the "detriment" for radiation protection?

The purpose of the ICRP detriment concept is to enable a quantitative comparison of stochastic radiation damage for the various organs. For this purpose, the organ-specific nominal risk coefficients are weighted with a function that is intended to express the amount of damage or, respectively, the severity of a disease. This function incorporates a variety of variables that do not depend on radiation parameters, but on characteristics of the disease itself. The question is raised as to whether the rather subtle way of defining the amount of damage is necessary for radiation protection purposes and whether a much simpler relationship can serve for this purpose as well or even better.

CRaTER observations and permissible mission duration for human operations in deep space

Prolonged exposure to the galactic cosmic ray (GCR) environment is a potentially limiting factor for manned missions in deep space. Evaluating the risk associated with the expected GCR environment is an essential step in planning a deep space mission. This requires an understanding of how the local interstellar spectrum is modulated by the heliospheric magnetic field (HMF) and how observed solar activity is manifested in the HMF over time. While current GCR models agree reasonably well with measured observations of GCR flux on the first matter, they must rely on imperfect or loose correlations to describe the latter. It is more accurate to use dose rates directly measured by instruments in deep space to quantify the GCR condition for a given period of time. In this work, dose rates observed by the Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) instrument are used to obtain the local GCR intensity and composition as a function of time. A response function is constructed that relates observed dose rates to solar modulation potential using a series of Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations. The record of observed solar modulation potential vs. time is then used to calculate a recent historical record of permissible mission duration (PMD) according to NASA's permissible exposure limits (PEL). Tables are provided for extreme values of PMD. Additional tables include risk of exposure-induced death (at upper 95% confidence interval) accrual rates and NASA effective dose rates as a function of solar modulation potential, astronaut age, sex, and shielding thickness. The significance of the PMD values reported in relation to likely transit duration requirements for future exploration missions is discussed. There is general agreement between CRaTER observations and the prescription of solar modulation vs. time given by the Badhwar-O'Neill 2014 GCR model. However, CRaTER observations do capture the effects of significant heliospheric transients, among other features, that are missing from the prescription of solar modulation potential vs. time.

A randomized comparison of estimated radiation exposure between Low and conventional dose protocol during invasive coronary angiography (ERICA trial): Pilot study

PURPOSE

Radiation exposure during coronary angiography is potentially harmful to patients and operators. However, there are limited data on the effects of a low-dose radiation angiography. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a reduced radiation dose protocol during invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

One hundred three consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography were enrolled and randomized to low- or conventional dose protocols (LDP versus CDP). The LDP consists of 10 frames per second during fluoroscopy and half the radiation dose of CDP during cineangiography. Image quality was assessed using a Likert rating scale by an independent radiologist. The radiation dose was estimated with dose-area product (DAP) and air-kerma (AK).

RESULTS

Body weight and waist circumference are well correlated with the level of DAP and AK. Exposure time and total images and frame counts in cineangiography were similar in both groups. There was a marked reduction of the estimated radiation dose (DAP and AK) in the LDP group compared to the CDP group without significant compromise in image quality (total DAP: LDP 1980.1 ± 1163.7 vs. CDP 3434.2 ± 2188.1 μGym² p = 0.001; total AK: 279.6 ± 159.3 vs. 493.8 ± 280.6 mGy, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The LDP reduced the total estimated radiation dose compared to the CDP without a significant loss of diagnostic information. A LDP may be a viable strategy to protect patients and medical staff from the hazards of radiation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Individual response of humans to ionising radiation: governing factors and importance for radiological protection

Tissue reactions and stochastic effects after exposure to ionising radiation are variable between individuals but the factors and mechanisms governing individual responses are not well understood. Individual responses can be measured at different levels of biological organization and using different endpoints following varying doses of radiation, including: cancers, non-cancer diseases and mortality in the whole organism; normal tissue reactions after exposures; and, cellular endpoints such as chromosomal damage and molecular alterations. There is no doubt that many factors influence the responses of people to radiation to different degrees. In addition to the obvious general factors of radiation quality, dose, dose rate and the tissue (sub)volume irradiated, recognized and potential determining factors include age, sex, life style (e.g., smoking, diet, possibly body mass index), environmental factors, genetics and epigenetics, stochastic distribution of cellular events, and systemic comorbidities such as diabetes or viral infections. Genetic factors are commonly thought to be a substantial contributor to individual response to radiation. Apart from a small number of rare monogenic diseases such as ataxia telangiectasia, the inheritance of an abnormally responsive phenotype among a population of healthy individuals does not follow a classical Mendelian inheritance pattern. Rather it is considered to be a multi-factorial, complex trait.

Pediatric radiologist-driven didactics for a pediatric residency program: a quality initiative

BACKGROUND

Pediatric residents exhibit knowledge gaps in appropriateness of imaging utilization.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the value of radiologist-driven imaging education in a pediatric residency program. The primary goals of this educational program were to provide pediatric residents with resources such as the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, support optimal resource utilization and patient care, increase resident understanding of radiation risk, and determine the value of integrating radiologists into pediatric education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A needs assessment was performed in which the chief residents of a large pediatric program were surveyed. The consensus of chief residents was that a four-part lecture series delivered by a pediatric radiology fellow would be beneficial to the pediatric residents. Topics included general radiation risk as well as basic imaging topics in the chest, abdomen, neurological system, extremities and vasculature. Each lecture integrated appropriate ordering, ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable)/Image Gently, and basic image interpretation. Residents were asked, using a Likert scale, to rate their understanding of radiation risk, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria, and other topics of interest before and after each lecture. Pediatric residents were given a 10-item quiz before and after the lecture series to assess their knowledge regarding the best test to order in clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

The average pre-lecture score for knowledge of radiation risk was 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.02-3.51) out of 5, which improved to 4.27 (95% CI: 4.09-4.57) post-lecture. There was an increase in understanding of ACR appropriateness, with pre-lecture rating of knowledge increasing from 1.91 (95% CI 1.54-2.29) out of 5 to 3.61 (95% CI 3.33-3.90) post-lecture. The residents averaged 82.7% (95% CI 77.3%-88.1%) on the appropriateness pre-test and 93.8% (95% CI 90.3%-97.2%) on the post-test. Residents provided positive feedback upon conclusion of the program and reported a beneficial effect on their education.

CONCLUSION

A radiologist-driven lecture series in a pediatric residency can improve resident understanding of appropriate ordering practices and radiation risk. Radiologist participation in pediatric residency training is well-received.

CT scan exposure in children with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts: single centre experience and review of the literature

PURPOSE

A computed tomography (CT) scan in childhood is associated with a greater incidence of brain cancer. CT scans are used in patients with ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunts in whom shunt dysfunction is suspected. We wanted to assess the CT scan exposure in a cohort of children with VP shunts and attempt to quantify their radiation exposure.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective analysis was performed recording CT head scans in children younger than 18 years with VP shunts. Hospital coding data was cross-referenced with electronic records and radiology databases both in our neurosurgery unit and in hospitals referring to it.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two children with VP shunts were identified. The mean time with shunt in situ was 5.4 years (± 4.61). A mean of 3.33 CT scans (range 0-20) were performed on each child, amounting to 0.65 (± 0.87) CTs per shunt year. Based on 2 msv of radiation per scan, this equates to an average exposure of 1.31 msv per child per shunt year.

CONCLUSION

Children who have multiple CT head scans for investigation of possible shunt dysfunction are at a greater risk of developing cancer. We discuss the implications of this increased risk and discuss strategies to limit radiation exposure in children with VP shunts.

Association of radiation risk in the second and third generations with polymorphisms in the genes CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTP1 and changes in the thyroid

Background

To study the association of radiation risk in the 2nd –3rd generations with polymorphisms in the genes CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTP1 and changes in the thyroid.

Methods

5 polymorphic gene variants (rs1048943, rs4646421, rs2070676, rs3813867, rs1695) were studied in 399 people living in the East Kazakhstan region in this research. 248 people of the 2nd - 3rd generation lived in the territory with radiation exposure in Abai, Borodulikha areas, and 151 people the comparison group lived in Kurchum district without radiation exposure comparable in sex and age with control group.

Results

The results show that there is a significant association of rs1048943 in exposed and unexposed groups (p < 0.003), and the absence of association of rs4646421, rs2070676, rs3813867, rs1695 in the studied groups. The mean value of thyroxine in carriers of the AG + GG genotype of rs4646421 is significantly lower than in AA genotype carriers (p = 0.04); no significant changes were found in genotypes’ distribution with thyroid-stimulating hormone and anti-thyroid peroxidase indicators. Significant changes were in levels of anti-thyroid peroxidase between exposed and unexposed groups (p = 0.007). The thyroxine - thyroid-stimulating hormone levels were not significantly different in exposed and unexposed groups (p > 0.3).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the association of rs1048943 polymorphism with living in the radiation zone in the 2nd and 3rd generations for the first time. Thyroxine levels decrease was identified in the 2nd and 3rd generation residents of the exposed area, as well as a significant increase of anti-thyroid peroxidase occurs in individuals of the 2nd and 3rd generation living in areas with radiation exposure.

Physicians' exposure to radiation during electrophysiology procedures

PURPOSE

Cardiologists are among the health professionals that are most exposed to ionizing radiation, but there is no study comparing the level of exposure of physicians during different electrophysiology procedures. We aimed to measure and compare cardiologists' exposure to radiation during different electrophysiology procedures.

METHODS

The study population comprised all electrophysiology procedures performed over a 6-month period in a large referral centre. The endpoint was operator radiation exposure, assessed using a personal electronic dosimeter located on the operator's left arm.

RESULTS

In total, 150 electrophysiology procedures were analyzed. Compared with electrophysiology studies (reference category), physician radiation exposure was 3-fold greater during ablation of atrial fibrillation, 9-fold greater during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT)/atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNT), and 10-fold greater during ablation of atrial flutter (p < 0.001). Physician exposure was mainly related to X-ray time (R² = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed significant differences in cardiologists' exposure to ionizing radiation depending on the type of electrophysiology procedure. Atrial flutter and AVNRT/AVNT ablations are the procedures in which operators are most exposed to ionizing radiation.

Looking for solutions: vision and a call-for-attention for radiation research scientists

Purpose: The concept of benefit-risk assessment has often been propagated for clinical professionals for deciding the radiological exam for the patient. A detailed look into how to use this concept leads to several unanswered questions. The purpose of this article is to bring forth questions which have remained unanswered for several decades. These questions pertain to our inability to provide needed information to physicians for making benefit-risk assessment for deciding a frequent imaging modality like the computed tomography (CT) such as non-applicability of risk estimates to an individual patient, the concept of cumulative risk at low doses, accounting for the time gap between series of CT scans, risk variation with age, gender and disease condition. In the absence of concrete information on these, it becomes essentially benefit assessment rather than benefit-risk. The article also provides a motivation to think that there are a large number of patients getting exposed every year to radiation doses over 100 mSv of effective dose and several tens of mGy of organ doses. This may provide a very large cohort for radiation effect studies. Further, a series of ideas are presented as a vision for future studies. Conclusions: The article emphasizes the need to create a research agenda to deal with day-to-day questions faced in medical practice and provides a call-for-attention. Further, it provides some challenging ideas as outside of the box thinking points that may provide research direction for future years.

Radiation Risk Categories in Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Tool to Aid in the Evaluation of Radiation Outcomes

To stratify diverse procedure types into categories with similar radiation exposure in cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease. Radiation exposures for a comprehensive list of specific procedure types and stratification of outcomes based on radiation risk are not currently available. Data between January 2014 and December 2015 were collected on all cases performed at sites participating in C3PO-QI (Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project-Quality Improvement Initiative) and 9 centers were included. Using expert consensus, 40 unique procedure types were defined by diagnostic characteristics or the intervention(s) performed, and dose area product (DAP) per kilogram of body weight (µGy × m²/kg) was summarized. Using empiric and consensus methods, three radiation risk categories were created. A total of 11,735 cases were included for analysis. Thirteen (n = 7918) procedure types with median DAP/kg < 100 were categorized in the low radiation exposure category (median DAP/kg 39). The medium exposure category (n = 1807) consisted of 16 procedure types with median DAP/kg values ranging 100 to < 200 (overall median DAP/kg 131). Finally, the high radiation exposure category (n = 1073) consisted of 11 procedure types with median DAP/kg ≥ 200 (overall median DAP/kg of 231). The radiation exposure risk categories created in this multi-center dataset are a critical step towards the development of a robust risk adjustment methodology for radiation exposure in catheterization for congenital heart disease.

Increased prevalence of essential hypertension in areas previously exposed to fallout due to nuclear weapons testing at the Semipalatinsk Test Site, Kazakhstan

This study examines the association between environmental radiation exposure and essential hypertension in a series of investigated geographical districts adjacent to the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site in Kazakhstan. The sample consists of 2000 volunteers participants in screening examinations in three administrative districts close to the nuclear test site, which was carried out as part of the Government Programs on Environmental Health Hazard. The cross-sectional study compares prevalence ratios in a population sample with long-term exposure in the low and intermediate dose range. Age-adjusted odds ratios for hypertension were found significantly increased with higher exposure groups. After accounting for main cardiovascular risk factors into the model and stratifying by gender, the prevalence odds ratios for radiation remained significantly increased, with a significant dose-response effect observed for some but not all subgroups. The results support existing evidence of cardiovascular health effects of radiation exposure and of persisting environmental health issues that require attention in both epidemiological surveys and healthcare provision.