Incidence of Procedure-Related Complications in Patients Treated With Atherectomy in the Femoropopliteal and Tibial Vessels in the Vascular Quality Initiative

PURPOSE

To compare procedural complications in patients undergoing atherectomy plus angioplasty (A+A) and plain balloon angioplasty (POBA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry undergoing first-time peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) were included. Those undergoing aortoiliac or pedal interventions, primary stenting, or hybrid procedures were excluded. Patients were stratified by lesion location (femoropopliteal [FP] or tibial [TIB]). The primary outcomes were target vessel dissection, distal embolization, and provisional stent placement. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and the need for subsequent interventions.

RESULTS

12 499 patients undergoing FP (49.6% A+A) and 6736 patients undergoing TIB (17.0% A+A) interventions were identified. In the FP group, A+A was associated with greater intraoperative target vessel dissection (4.5% vs 2.6%, p<0.001), distal embolization (1.5% vs 0.7%, p =0.001), and provisional stent placement (1.5% vs 0%, p<0.001); and greater postoperative target vessel dissection (4.2% vs 2.0%, p<0.001) and distal embolization (0.9% vs 0.4%, p=0.034). In the TIB group, A+A was associated with fewer intraoperative vessel dissection (0.8% vs 2.3%, p=0.011) but greater provisional stent placement (0.3% vs 0%, p<0.001). TIB A+A was also associated with higher rates of technical success (97.6% vs 95.1%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atherectomy was associated with increased procedural-related complications in femoropopliteal, but not in tibial vessels. Future studies addressing lesion morphology, device design, and technique may help define its role in peripheral vascular interventions.

Crossing complex infrapopliteal lesions utilizing a front-end cutting technique: A report of two cases with a novel rotational atherectomy device

Critical limb ischemia represents the most severe stage of peripheral vascular disease and patients often present with complex, calcified infrapopliteal lesions. Atherectomy is an endovascular treatment modality that can be used to debulk otherwise uncrossable lesions. We performed a retrospective, single-center, case report of two patients who presented with critical limb ischemia and whose complex and calcified infrapopliteal lesions were treated with the 1.5 mm Phoenix Atherectomy System after prior failed angioplasty attempts. The 1.5 mm Phoenix Atherectomy System successfully debulked each infrapopliteal lesion, and each patient achieved thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow of the target lesion. There were no device-related procedural complications or deaths. These cases demonstrate that the Phoenix Atherectomy System can be used to debulk complex, calcified infrapopliteal lesions to optimize endovascular treatment and improve outcomes for patients with critical limb ischemia. Further studies are warranted to validate the long-term safety and efficacy rates of the Phoenix Atherectomy System in a larger critical limb ischemia population.

Long-term clinical outcomes of excimer laser coronary atherectomy for the management of recurrent in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a serious problem. Optimal modification of the underlying mechanism during index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is key to prevent ISR. Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) has its own indications and is among others used in recurrent ISR in case of stent underexpansion and/or diffuse neointimal hyperplasia. We aimed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of ELCA for the management of recurrent ISR.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted. Patients with recurrent ISR who were additionally treated with ELCA were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target lesion revascularization at 12 months, and longer term.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2022, 51 patients underwent PCI with the additional use ELCA for recurrent ISR. Primary outcome occurred in 6 patients (11.8%) at 12 months and in 12 patients (23.5%) at a median follow-up of 4 (1-6) years. Technical and procedural success were achieved in 92% and 90% of cases, respectively. Coronary perforation occurred in 2 patients as a result of distal wire perforation, but was not ELCA-related. There were no in-hospital MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

ELCA appears to be a safe method with acceptable long-term results for the management of recurrent ISR.

Racial Differences in Presentation and Outcomes After Peripheral Arterial Interventions: Insights From the NCDR-PVI Registry

BACKGROUND

We assess the rates of device use and outcomes by race among patients undergoing lower extremity peripheral arterial intervention using the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI) registry.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PVI between April 2014 and March 2019 were included. Socioeconomic status was evaluated using the Distressed Community Index score for patients' zip codes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with utilization of drug-eluting technologies, intravascular imaging, and atherectomy. Among patients with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data, we compared 1-year mortality, rates of amputation, and repeat revascularizations.

RESULTS

Of 63 150 study cases, 55 719 (88.2%) were performed in White patients and 7431 (11.8%) in Black patients. Black patients were younger (67.9 versus 70.0 years), had higher rates of hypertension (94.4% versus 89.5%), diabetes (63.0% versus 46.2%), less likely to be able to walk 200 m (29.1% versus 24.8%), and higher Distressed Community Index scores (65.1 versus 50.6). Black patients were provided drug-eluting technologies at a higher rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.23]) with no difference in atherectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.05]) or intravascular imaging (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.88-1.22]) use. Black patients experienced a lower rate of acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.72-0.88]). In Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked analyses of 7429 cases (11.8%), Black patients were significantly less likely to have surgical (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.17-0.96]) or repeat PVI revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.30-0.59]) at 1 year compared with White patients. There was no difference in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [0.8-1.4]) or major amputation (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.5 [95% CI, 0.8-7.6]) between Black and White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients presenting for PVI were younger, had higher prevalence of comorbidities and lower socioeconomic status. After adjustment, Black patients were less likely to have surgical or repeat PVI revascularization after the index PVI procedure.

Long-Term Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Background

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) represent 4% of all PCIs for stable angina in the United States and have been associated with lower success and higher in-hospital event rates compared with non-CTO PCIs. We aimed to examine long-term outcomes of CTO PCI compared with non-CTO PCI, including prespecified subgroups of high-risk non-CTO PCI (atherectomy/saphenous vein graft/unprotected left main).

Methods

Among 551,722 patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry linked to Medicare (July 2009-December 2016), we evaluated in-hospital events and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events of CTO PCIs (N = 29,407) compared with non-CTO PCIs (N = 522,315). We then evaluated similar outcomes between CTO PCIs and high-risk non-CTO PCIs (N = 53,662). We excluded patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Results

Patients undergoing CTO PCI were more likely to be younger and male. CTO PCI was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital events compared with non-CTO PCI (7.0% vs 4.2%; P < .001) and high-risk non-CTO PCI (7.0% vs 6.5%; P = .008). In addition, CTO PCI was associated with a slightly higher risk of long-term repeat revascularization compared with non-CTO PCI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.13). However, compared with high-risk non-CTO PCIs, CTO PCIs were associated with a slightly lower risk of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90) and readmission (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90).

Conclusions

In this study, CTO PCI was associated with higher risk of both in-hospital and out-of-hospital events but a slightly lower risk of long-term events compared with high-risk non-CTO PCIs. These findings shed light on the complexity of various PCI procedures that can inform clinicians and patients of expected outcomes.

Jetstream Atherectomy with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons: Two-Year Outcome of the Prospective Randomized JET-RANGER Study

Background

The JET-RANGER study (NCT03206762) was a multicenter (11 US centers) randomized trial, core lab adjudicated, designed to demonstrate the superiority of Jetstream + Paclitaxel coated balloon (JET+PCB) versus angioplasty (PTA) + PCB in treating femoropopliteal (FP) arterial disease. The one-year primary endpoint of JET-RANGER has been recently published. The 2-year outcome data are presented in this report.

Methods

There were 43 patients who completed the 1-year follow-up. Two were lost to follow-up and one died prior to the 2-year follow-up, resulting in 40 patients. Fifteen patients were randomized to PTA+PCB and 25 patients to JET +PCB. Kaplan Meier Survival analysis was performed to estimate the freedom from TLR. Bailout stenting was not considered a TLR in this analysis. Statistical significance was determined by a p-value < 0.05.

Results

Freedom from TLR was similar between the 2 groups at 2 years. There was also no significant difference in the change of ABI between the PTA + PCB and JET + PCB from baseline at 6-months, (p-value = 0.7890), 1-year (p-value = 0.4070), and 2-year (p-value=0.7410). There was also no statistical difference between the JET + PCB and PTA + PCB arms for RCC improvement by one or more category, (p-value= 1.000). There were no minor or major amputations for either arm throughout the 2-year follow up. One JET + PCB patient died before the 2-year specified window.

Conclusion

JET + PCB had similar freedom from TLR and improvement in ABI and RCC at 2-year follow-up when compared to PTA + PCB with no difference in amputation or mortality between the 2 arms.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT03206762.

Stentless Treatment for a Left Main Quadrifurcation Lesion

In this 69-year-old patient, a complex left main quadrifurcation lesion was treated with a stentless procedure, which resulted in sufficient dilation in each branch. Dual-antiplatelet therapy was continued for 3 months, followed by aspirin alone. The stentless treatment with DCB after sufficient plaque debulking with DCA can be useful in avoiding long-term dual antiplatelet therapy especially in patients with high-bleeding risk or those who plan to undergo the non-cardiac operation.

Assessment of Patterns of Atherectomy Use

Background Atherectomy has become the fastest growing catheter-based peripheral vascular intervention performed in the United States, and overuse has been linked to increased reimbursement, but the patterns of use have not been well characterized. Methods and Results We used Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Preferred Provider Organization and Medicare fee-for-service professional claims data from the Michigan Value Collaborative for patients undergoing office-based laboratory atherectomy in 2019 to calculate provider-specific rates of atherectomy use, reimbursement, number of vessels treated, and number of atherectomies per patient. We also calculated the rate that each provider converted a new patient visit to an endovascular procedure within 90 days. Correlations between parameters were assessed with simple linear regression. Providers completing ≥20 office-based laboratory atherectomies and ≥20 new patient evaluations during the study period were included. A total of 59 providers performing 4060 office-based laboratory atherectomies were included. Median professional reimbursement per procedure was $4671.56 (interquartile range [IQR], $2403.09-$7723.19) from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and $14 854.49 (IQR, $9414.80-$18 816.33) from Medicare, whereas total professional reimbursement from both payers ranged from $2452 to $6 880 402 per year. Median 90-day conversion rate was 5.0% (IQR, 2.5%-10.0%), whereas the median provider-level average number of vessels treated per patient was 1.20 (IQR, 1.13-1.31) and the median provider-level average number of treatments per patient was 1.38 (IQR, 1.26-1.63). Total annual reimbursement for each provider was directly correlated with new patient-procedure conversion rate (R2=0.47; P<0.001), mean number of vessels treated per patient (R2=0.31; P<0.001), and mean number of treatments per patient (R2=0.33; P<0.001). Conclusions A minority of providers perform most procedures and are reimbursed substantially more per procedure compared with most providers. Procedural conversion rate, number of vessels, and number of treatments per patient represent potential policy levers to curb overuse.

Atherectomy Plus Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Disease Compared to Balloon Angioplasty Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes.

Results

Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; P = .37).

Conclusions

Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.

Auryon Laser in Peripheral Arterial Interventions: A Single-Center Experience (Auryon-SCE)

BACKGROUND

The Auryon 355-nm laser atherectomy system (AngioDynamics, Inc) showed a low rate of target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6-month follow-up in the investigational device exemption study. At present, real-world data are not available. In this study, we analyze major adverse events and 6-month outcomes with the Auryon laser system in treating infrainguinal arterial disease in all comers at a single center.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated with the Auryon laser between September 2017 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a single operator at a single center. Demographic, procedural, angiographic, and outcome data were extracted from patients' medical records. Descriptive and survival analyses were performed. The study's primary endpoint was the assessment of freedom from TLR at 6-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included acute procedural results, distal embolization, bailout stenting (dissection type D or higher by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI] classification, and/or residual narrowing >30%), unplanned major amputation, death, or vascular complications.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (65 procedures, 70 lesions) were enrolled. The mean age was 70.9 ± 10 years, 66.1% were males, 48.2% were diabetics, and 25% had limb ischemia. Of the 70 lesions, 31.4% had severe calcification, 38.6% were chronic total occlusions, and 48.6% were de novo disease (in-stent restenosis in 28.6%). The majority of treated vessels were femoropopliteal (88.6%) and 29.2% had 2 or more prior interventions. Mean stenosis was 91.3 ± 9.7% at baseline, 56.0 ± 17.3% post laser, and 11.4 ± 11.2% post final treatment. Lesion length was 117.1 ± 101.2 mm and treated length was 174.0 ± 116.0 mm. Bailout stenting occurred in 11/70 lesions (15.7%). There were no NHLBI type D dissections post laser and 1 type D dissection post laser + percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A total of 47.1% received Lutonix drug-coated balloons (BD/Bard), 27.1% received In.Pact drug-coated balloons (Boston Scientific), and 1.4% received both. The probability of freedom from TLR per procedure was 95.6% at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world cohort of patients with complex disease, the Auryon laser had excellent freedom from TLR at 6 months, although these findings need to be replicated in a randomized trial.

Reasons for lesion uncrossability as assessed by intravascular ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study was to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to clarify anatomical and morphological lesion characteristics of uncrossable lesions.

BACKGROUND

Uncrossable lesions are not always severely calcified. The prevalence of uncrossable lesions that are nonseverely calcified as well as other mechanisms for uncrossability has not been well clarified.

METHODS

A total of 252 de novo uncrossable lesions in native coronary arteries that underwent either rotational or orbital atherectomy due to inability of any balloon to cross the lesion and 38 lesions with severe calcium in which IVUS crossed preatherectomy were included. Severe calcium is defined as maximum arc of calcium ≥270°.

RESULTS

Severe calcification was absent in 16% of uncrossable lesions, 83% of which had a significant vessel bend. Compared with crossable lesions with severe calcium, uncrossable lesions with severe calcium more often had a bend in the vessel (71% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and a longer length of continuous severe calcium (median length of calcium ≥270° 3.8 mm vs. 1.9 mm, p = 0.001). Other than severe calcium (especially long continuous calcium) or a bend in the vessel, anatomical factors associated with uncrossabilty were aorto-ostial lesion location and small vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncrossable lesions are not always severely calcified. The interaction of lesion morphology (continuous long and large arcs of calcium) and vessel geometry (bend in the vessel or ostial lesion location) affect lesion crossability.

How Much Debulking with Atherectomy is Enough When Treating Infrainguinal Arterial Interventions? The Balance Between Residual Stenosis and Adventitial Injury

Atherectomy is an effective vessel prepping device but not all atherectomy devices are equal. The depth of vessel injury and residual narrowing vary considerably among atherectomy devices with significant implications on outcome. Precision imaging is critical to optimize outcome using atherectomy as a vessel prepping technique. Prospective trials need to test the hypothesis that precision imaging has a significant impact on how operators approach the treatment of infrainguinal arterial disease.

Outcomes of rotational atherectomy followed by cutting balloon versus plain balloon before drug-eluting stent implantation for calcified coronary lesions: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon (RACB) versus rotational atherectomy and plain balloon (RAPB) before drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in calcified coronary lesions.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing RACB with RAPB were identified through a systematic search of published literature across multiple databases. Random effect meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome between the two groups.

RESULTS

Four studies were included in the meta-analysis (three observational and one RCT) involving a total of 315 patients. 166 patients had RACB, and 149 patients had RAPB before DES placement with a median follow-up of 11.5 months. Compared with patients who had RAPB there was no difference in MACE (composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-2.18], slow flow/no reflow (OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.23-2.16), all-cause mortality (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 0.28-14.60), and device success rate (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 0.28-11.18) in the RACB approach. There was a benefit towards less target lesion revascularization in the RACB group; however, this outcome was reported in two studies (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08-0.99). On meta-regression there was no association between age, sex, diabetes, or lesion location with MACE and all-cause mortality. The studies were homogenous across all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

RACB, as compared with RAPB, had a similar risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, device success, and complication, but a lower risk of target lesion revascularization.

National trends and variability of atherectomy use for peripheral vascular interventions from 2010 to 2019

OBJECTIVES

Small, older studies suggest atherectomy devices have become common in peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) despite the paucity of strong clinical guidelines. We analyzed the 10-year trends in the use of atherectomy for PVI across the United States and identified main predictors of atherectomy use.

METHODS

Using the Vascular Quality Initiative Registry, we identified all patients who had endovascular PVI for occlusive lower-extremity arterial disease from 2010 to 2019. Procedures in which an atherectomy device was recorded as the primary or secondary device were classified as the atherectomy group. We calculated frequency of atherectomy use over time and across geographic regions. Using regression modeling, we identified factors that were independently associated with atherectomy use.

RESULTS

There were 205,377 procedures on 152,693 unique patients. Over 10 years, 16.6% of PVI procedures used atherectomy, increasing from 8.5% in 2010 to 19.7% in 2019, P_trend <0.0001. Across 17 geographic regions, there was a significant difference in the prevalence of atherectomy use, ranging from 8.2% to 29%. The strongest predictor of atherectomy use was the procedure being done in an office setting (OR 10.08, 95% CI 9.17-11.09) or ambulatory center (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.65-4.39) vs hospital setting. The presence of severe (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.85) or moderate (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.69) lesion calcification was also predictive of atherectomy use. Other predictors included elective status, insurance provider, lesion length, prior PVI, claudication symptoms, and diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Atherectomy use in PVI significantly increased between 2010 and 2019. There is wide regional variability in the use of atherectomy that seems to be driven more strongly by non-clinical factors.

Coronary orbital atherectomy treatment of Hispanic and Latino patients: A real-world comparative analysis

Objectives

To assess coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) use in Hispanic or Latino (HL) patients compared to non‐HL patients.

Background

HL patients are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease mortality compared with Whites with similar coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores. The safety and efficacy of coronary atherectomy in the HL patient population is unknown due to the under‐representation of minorities in clinical trial research.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing coronary OA treatment of severely calcified lesions at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB) was completed. From January 2014 to September 2020, a total of 609 patients from MSMCMB who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with OA were identified in the electronic health records.

Results

Of those identified, 350 (57.5%) had an ethnicity classification of HL. The overall mean age was 74 years and there was a high prevalence of diabetes in the HL group compared to the non‐HL group (49.7% vs. 34.7%; p = 0.0003). Severe angiographic complications were uncommon and in‐hospital freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, MI, and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accidents), was 98.5% overall, with no significant difference between the HL and non‐HL groups, despite the higher prevalence of diabetes in the HL group.

Conclusions

This study represents the largest real‐world experience of OA use in HL versus non‐HL patients. The main finding in this retrospective analysis is that OA can be performed safely and effectively in a high‐risk population of HL patients.

Treatment failure after rotational atherectomy and balloon angioplasty in recurrent cystic adventitial disease of the popliteal artery: a case report

Cystic adventitial disease (CAD), which usually affects the popliteal artery, is a rare vascular condition in which fluid accumulates in the sub-adventitial layer, compressing the lumen. Historically, surgical treatment is preferred over endovascular or minimally invasive techniques, due to its lower recurrence rates. Here, the case of a 67-year-old male patient, in whom rotational atherectomy was performed for recurrent CAD following surgical cyst excision and patch angioplasty is reported. The patient’s symptoms recurred one day after the rotational atherectomy procedure and repeat computed tomography angiography showed recurrence of the disease. Due to gradual worsening of the condition during 8 months of follow-up, left distal femoral artery to popliteal artery (below-the-knee) bypass surgery was performed using an ipsilateral reversed great saphenous vein graft. Follow-up has continued for 2 years without complications or requirement of additional treatment. This novel case is the first report of atherectomy attempted for recurrent CAD that led to an early recurrence. Our experience emphasises that additional surgical approaches should be selected over endovascular procedures for treating recurrent CAD.

Index Atherectomy Peripheral Vascular Interventions Performed for Claudication are Associated with More Reinterventions than Non-Atherectomy Interventions

OBJECTIVE

Despite limited evidence supporting atherectomy alone over stenting/angioplasty as the index peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), the use of atherectomy has rapidly increased in recent years. We previously identified a wide distribution of atherectomy practice patterns among US physicians. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of index atherectomy with reintervention.

METHODS

100% Medicare fee-for-service claims were used to identify all beneficiaries who underwent elective first-time femoropopliteal peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for claudication between 1/1/2019-12/31/2019. Subsequent PVI reinterventions were examined through 6/30/2021. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the rate of PVI reinterventions for patients who received index atherectomy vs. non-atherectomy procedures. Reintervention rates were also described for physicians by their overall atherectomy use (by quartile). A hierarchical Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate patient and physician-level characteristics associated with reinterventions.

RESULTS

A total of 15,246 patients underwent index PVI for claudication in 2019, of which 59.7% were atherectomy. After a median of 603 days (IQR 77, 784) of follow-up, 41.2% of patients underwent a PVI reintervention, including 48.9% of patients who underwent index atherectomy vs. 29.8% of patients who underwent index non-atherectomy (P<0.001). Patients treated by high physician users of atherectomy (quartile 4) received more reinterventions than patients treated by standard physician users (quartiles 1-3) (56.8% vs. 39.6%, P<0.001). After adjustment, patient factors association with PVI reintervention included receipt of index atherectomy (aHR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21-1.46), Black race (vs. White, aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34), diabetes (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.21), and urban residence (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22). Physician factors associated with reintervention included male sex (aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.04), high-volume PVI practices (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37), and physicians with high use of index atherectomy (aHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74). Vascular surgeons had a lower risk of PVI reintervention than Cardiologists (vs. Vascular, aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38), Radiologists (aHR 1.55, 95% CI 1.31-1.83), and other specialties (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.20-2.11). Location of services delivered was not associated with reintervention (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of atherectomy as an index PVI for claudication is associated with higher PVI reintervention rates compared to non-atherectomy procedures. Similarly, high physician users of atherectomy perform more PVI reinterventions than their peers. The appropriateness of using atherectomy for initial treatment of claudication needs critical reevaluation.

The safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatments for in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal artery: A network meta-analysis

Purpose: Femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenging treatment. We performed a network meta-analysis (NWM) for femoropopliteal artery ISR to explore the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapeutic strategies. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used as data sources. The network meta-analysis (NWM) approach used random-effects models based on the frequentist framework. We compared technical success rate, primary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major amputation at the 12-month follow-up for femoropopliteal artery ISR. Results: In total, 14 eligible studies (10 prospective and four retrospective; 1348 patients; and eight treatment modalities - standard balloon angioplasty (SBA), drug-coated balloon (DCB), peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty (PCBA), Viabahn endoprosthesis (VBE), directional atherectomy (DA), excimer laser atherectomy (ELA), and combinations - were included. The primary patency rates (at 6 months) were significantly higher for DCB and ELA+DCB than for SBA and ELA+SBA. ELA+DCB had higher primary patency rates (at 12 months) than ELA+SBA and SBA. The technical success rates were significantly lower for DCB and SBA than for VBE. The major amputation rates were significantly lower for ELA+DCB than for DCB. Based on the surface values under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), ELA+DCB was considered the best treatment in terms of primary patency at 6 months (SUCRA = 91.1), primary patency at 12 months (SUCRA = 82.3), and TLR (SUCRA = 83.4). Conclusion: ELA+DCB showed positive encouraging results in primary patency (6, 12 months), TLR, and major amputation in femoropopliteal ISR. The efficacy and safety of ELA+DCB are worthy of further investigation. (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021246674).

Acute Real-World Outcomes From the Phoenix Post-Approval Registry

OBJECTIVES

An evaluation of the 30-day safety and performance outcomes of the Phoenix atherectomy system (Philips Volcano Corporation) was performed in real-world patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

The Phoenix Post-Approval Registry is an all-comer study that enrolled patients with infrainguinal PAD. Patients treated with the Phoenix atherectomy system were followed for 30 days to observe device-related complications. Outcomes evaluated include procedural (final target lesion(s) residual stenosis of ≤30% after treatment with Phoenix and any other adjunctive therapy) and technical success (defined as achieving a post-Phoenix [prior to any adjunctive therapy] residual diameter stenosis of ≤50%), target-vessel revascularization (TVR), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), target-limb amputation, ankle brachial index, Rutherford clinical category, and wound, ischemia, foot infection (WIfI) classification.

RESULTS

Of the 500 patients enrolled, 259 had CLI, including 26.3% with Rutherford class 6. Procedural success rates were 97.3% for non-CLI patients and 98.2% for CLI patients. Technical success rates were 71.5% for non-CLI patients and 77.9% for CLI patients. Complication rates post Phoenix atherectomy were <1%. Through the 30-day follow-up, there were 6 patients (1.3%; 2 claudicants, 4 CLIs) who underwent TLR and 8 patients who underwent TVR. There were no major amputations in the non-CLI and CLI cohorts. In the CLI cohort, 16/235 (6.8%) underwent minor amputations. Higher stages of Rutherford class and WIfI classification were associated with amputations at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

The Phoenix atherectomy system is a safe and effective treatment option in the acute setting for patients with PAD, including those with advanced Rutherford class. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Calcium Modification Therapies in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) has been known to be associated with worse Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) short- and long-term outcomes. Nowadays, with the increased prevalence of the risk factors leading to CAC in the population and also more PCI procedures done in older patients and with the growing number of higher-risk cases of Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) PCI and PCI after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), severe cases of CAC are now encountered on a daily basis in the catheterization lab and remain a big challenge to the interventional community, making it crucial to identify cases of severe CAC and plan a CAC PCI modification strategy upfront. Improved CAC detection with intravascular imaging helped identify more of these severe CAC cases and predict response to therapy and stent expansion based on CAC distribution in the vessel. Multiple available therapies for CAC modification have evolved over the years. Familiarity with the specifics and special considerations and limitations of each of these tools are essential in the choice and application of these therapies when used in severe CAC treatment. In this review, we discuss CAC pathophysiology, modes of detection, and different available therapies for CAC modification.

Primary Angioplasty of Calcified Coronary Lesions Using Coronary Lithotripsy in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

This study reports procedural and short-term clinical outcomes from a real-world series with the use of coronary lithotripsy in the context of primary angioplasty in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective registry conducted at 2 hospitals, which included 10 patients who presented a culprit calcified lesion within acute STEMI and underwent coronary lithotripsy during primary angioplasty, between July 2019 and July 2020. Mean age was 69.2 ± 11.8 years, and there was a high proportion of hypertension (70%) and dyslipidemia (60%). All lesions (type B/C) were predilated with a semicompliant balloon. Coronary lithotripsy was performed in all cases once macroscopic thrombus was successfully retrieved by thrombus aspiration catheter. Before lithotripsy, rotational atherectomy was used in 1 case and cutting balloon was used in 2 cases. On average, coronary lithotripsy required the use of 1 lithotripsy balloon (range, 1-2) delivering a mean of 70 pulses. Two lithotripsy balloons were ruptured during lithotripsy therapy without any adverse event. Successful coronary lithotripsy was achieved in 90%. There were no periprocedural cardiac complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary lithotripsy seems to be a safe and effective technique in patients with STEMI and a culprit calcified lesion undergoing primary angioplasty for calcium modification in the absence of angiographic thrombus, and a suitable option to achieve adequate stent expansion and apposition.

The Impact of Calcium on Chronic Total Occlusion Management

Coronary artery calcification is prevalent in chronic total occlusions (CTO), particularly in those of longer duration and post-coronary artery bypass. The presence of calcium predicts lower procedural success rates and a higher risk of complications of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention. Adjunctive imaging, including pre-procedural computed tomography and intracoronary imaging, are useful to understand the distribution and morphology of the calcium. Specialised guidewires and microcatheters, as well as penetration, subintimal entry and luminal re-entry techniques, are required to cross calcific CTOs. The use of both atherectomy devices and balloon-based calcium modification tools has been reported during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention, although they are limited by concerns regarding safety and efficacy in the subintimal space.