Results of an intervention in an academic Internal Medicine Clinic to continue, step-down, or discontinue proton pump inhibitor therapy related to a tennessee medicaid formulary change

BACKGROUND

In July 2005, the State of Tennessee Medicaid Program (TennCare) announced formulary changes for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to be implemented in August 2005. Prior to these changes, pantoprazole was the only preferred PPI, and there were no restrictions to its use. The revised formulary included 3 preferred PPIs (esomeprazole, lansoprazole, and omeprazole OTC), all of which required prior authorization (PA). In order to obtain an approved PA for a PPI, the patient was required to have either (a) a diagnosis of erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Schatzki's ring, a pathological hypersecretory condition (e.g., Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, multiple endocrine adenoma), grade III-IV gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy, significant gastrointestinal bleed; or (b) another indication for acid suppression therapy (e.g., GERD, hyperacidity in cystic fibrosis, gastric or duodenal ulcer, gastroparesis) with a history of failure of prior therapy with a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2-blocker). The internal medicine clinic of a regional medical center implemented an intervention to address these changes in formulary status of PPIs.

OBJECTIVE

To (a) describe the process used by an internal medicine clinic to ensure that patients requiring acid suppression therapy received appropriate treatment according to revised TennCare formulary criteria without unnecessary interruption of therapy, and (b) assess self-reported symptom control 8 months after intervention in the patients who either discontinued therapy or stepped-down to H2-blocker therapy.

METHODS

This study involved TennCare patients in an internal medicine clinic who received a new or refill prescription for pantoprazole between April 20 and June 20, 2005, from the medical center's outpatient pharmacy. A clinical pharmacist and an internal medicine physician collaborated to develop a protocol for adjusting acid suppression therapy. A clinical pharmacist reviewed medical records for all patients identified to verify indications for acid suppression therapy and review medication history. Patient telephone interviews were also conducted for patients whose indication or medication history could not be determined by chart review. Patients who met TennCare criteria for PPI therapy were continued on PPI therapy after a PA was obtained (PA group). Patients who had a documented indication for acid suppression therapy but did not meet the PA criteria for PPI therapy were changed to H2-blocker therapy (step-down group). Patients without a documented indication for acid suppression therapy were discontinued from acid suppression therapy (discontinue therapy group). A follow-up chart review and patient telephone interview were conducted 8 months after the intervention for patients in the step-down and discontinue therapy groups. The purpose of this follow-up review was to determine (a) the proportion of patients who were taking acid suppression therapy, (b) the type of acid suppression therapy (PPI or H2-blocker), and (c) self-report of adequate control of symptoms (defined as symptoms once weekly or less).

RESULTS

Of 135 TennCare beneficiaries who were active patients of the internal medicine clinic and received a prescription from the outpatient pharmacy for PPI therapy (pantoprazole) between April 20 and June 20, 2005, 6 patients were excluded because they reported stopping PPI therapy on their own. Of the remaining 129 patients, 18 (14.0%) did not have an indication for PPI therapy and acid suppression therapy was discontinued (discontinue therapy group), 40 (31.0%) met the TennCare PA criteria for continuation of PPI therapy (PA group), and 71 (55.0%) did not meet the TennCare PA criteria and were stepped down to a H2-blocker (step-down group). At the 8-month follow-up, acid suppression therapy was assessed in 68 patients (21 patients were lost to follow-up): 13 patients (19.1%) had resumed PPI therapy; 38 (55.9%) were using an H2-blocker; and 17 (25.0%) were not using acid suppression therapy. Telephone interviews were completed for 45 of the 75 patients in the step-down and discontinue therapy groups who did not receive an escalation in acid suppression therapy after the initial intervention (i.e., who did not make a change from H2-blocker therapy to PPI therapy or from no acid suppression therapy to H2-blocker or PPI therapy). Twenty-eight patients (62.2%) reported symptoms once per week or less; 14 patients (31.1%) reported symptoms more often than once weekly. Symptom control was unable to be determined in 3 patients (6.7%) because of incomplete information obtained from the patient during the interview.

CONCLUSIONS

After a proactive collaboration between physicians and clinical pharmacists in response to changes in TennCare formulary criteria for PPIs, more than one-half of patients were stepped down to H2-blocker therapy, and 14% were discontinued from acid suppression therapy. Among the step-down or therapy discontinuation patients for whom data were available at the 8-month follow-up, 81% were still using either an H2-blocker or no acid suppressing therapy at all, and 19% had resumed PPI use.

The concept of medical auditing

The contribution of drug utilisation studies on national, regional and local levels, to the quality control or audit of drug therapy is discussed. Two major types of audit, self-audit and peer-group audit, are outlined and examples presented illustrating how the concept of audit may be applied to therapeutics with special reference to drug information centres, feedback of drug prescribing data, and drug formularies. When drug information on prescribing practice from these sources is disseminated to the prescribers without value judgements being made, the component of self-audit is predominant in contrast to drug information dealing with prescribing appropriateness, in which peer-group opinion is expressed. Methods of capturing and disseminating data on prescribing practice which could be used in the auditing process are described. However, the greatest contribution to therapeutic audit lies with those responsible for medical training who should foster the quality of selfcriticism and the quest for high standards of prescribing practice in their students.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs: how to start and steer a successful program

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials by selecting the appropriate dose, duration, and route of administration. The appropriate use of antimicrobials has the potential to improve efficacy, reduce treatment-related costs, minimize drug-related adverse events, and limit the potential for emergence of antimicrobial resistance.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize ASP tactics that can improve the appropriate use of antimicrobials in the hospital setting. Several measures can be used to implement such programs and gain multidisciplinary support while addressing common barriers.

SUMMARY

Implementation of an ASP requires a multidisciplinary approach with an infectious diseases physician and a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training as its core team members. As identified by recently published guidelines, 2 proactive strategies for promoting antimicrobial stewardship include: (1) formulary restriction and pre-authorization, and (2) prospective audit with intervention and feedback. Other supplemental strategies involve education, guidelines and clinical pathways, antimicrobial order forms, de-escalation of therapy, intravenous-to-oral (IV-to-PO) switch therapy, and dose optimization. Several barriers exist to successful implementation of ASPs. These include obtaining adequate administrative support and compensation for team members. Gaining physician acceptance can also be challenging if there is a perceived loss of autonomy in clinical decision making.

CONCLUSION

ASPs have the potential to reduce antimicrobial resistance, health care costs, and drug-related adverse events while improving clinical outcomes. The efforts and expense required to implement and maintain ASPs are more than justified given their potential benefits to both the hospital and the patient.

A survey of Pharmacy and Therapeutic committees across Canada: scope and responsibilities

BACKGROUND

Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) committees have traditionally evaluated and developed policies for the clinical use of medications and for ensuring safe and effective drug use and administration.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the current activities of hospital P&T committees across Canada.

METHODS

Surveys were mailed to 856 (693 English, 163 French translations) Canadian hospitals (acute, chronic or rehabilitation) across Canada. Questions consisted of information on P&T membership, scope and responsibilities. Completed surveys were returned by fax. All data was entered into Excel and analyzed for descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

123 surveys were returned, representing 207 hospitals, for an effective response rate of 24%. Four hospitals returned incomplete surveys. Surveys were returned from all areas of Canada, except the territories. On average, P&T committees met six times per year. The average size of the committees was 11 members, with physicians comprising half the membership. Pharmacists and nurses had equal representation; other members were community representatives, dieticians, quality assurance personnel and/or administrators. The top responsibilities of the P&T committee were inpatient formulary management (93% of respondents), drug-use policy making (92%), adverse drug reaction monitoring (83%), patient safety (80%) and drug-use monitoring (80%). Subcommittees were utilized by 46% of P&T committees including antimicrobial (38%), medication safety (25%) and nutrition (14%). Economic evaluations were most frequently completed by a pharmacist who had some previous pharmacoeconomic experience.

CONCLUSION

This survey reports on the current status and responsibilities, namely formulary management and policy making, of P&T committees in Canada.

Formulary access using a PDA-based drug reference tool: does it affect prescribing behavior?

We assessed the association between formulary access via a handheld drug reference tool and utilization of generic (Tier 1) and non-generic, non-formulary (Tier 3) medications. In a retrospective before-after study of physician prescribing behavior for patients in a large, national health plan, physicians with formulary access using Epocrates(TM) showed smaller (0.5%) increases in Tier 3 prescribing over time compared to physicians without such access.

Using cost-effectiveness analysis to sharpen formulary decision-making: the example of tiotropium at the Veterans Affairs health care system

OBJECTIVE

To identify a cost-saving subset of criteria for the use of tiotropium at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center based on a cost-effectiveness analysis with ipratropium as the comparator.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records for the calendar year 2004 was conducted. The sample was drawn from a population at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center that had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and had filled prescriptions for ipratropium. The tiotropium sample was based on a modeled cohort of COPD patients who had received tiotropium. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. The outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus ipratropium.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $2360 per avoided exacerbation. Tiotropium cost-effectiveness increased with COPD severity and was cost-saving in patients with very severe disease (ICER = $-1818) and in patients with a previous COPD-related hospitalization (ICER = $-4472). The ICER was most sensitive to the relative effectiveness and price of tiotropium. Results identified the levels of treatment effectiveness and price beyond which tiotropium would become cost-saving relative to ipratropium.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the existing Veterans Affairs practice of offering tiotropium to patients with COPD-related hospitalizations. Periodic review of the effectiveness data to determine whether tiotropium would be cost-saving in patients with very severe COPD is suggested. Cost-effectiveness analyses that identify practical criteria-for-use should become an integral part of the formulary process.

Antimicrobial stewardship

In response to the global antibiotic resistance crisis, antimicrobial stewardship programs have emerged throughout the United States. Effective programs integrate several strategic methods, including evaluation and feedback regarding the necessity and appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy, staff education, and formulary restrictions. Multidisciplinary teams as well as institutional support are needed to form effective subcommittees to monitor national and local surveillance reports and resistance patterns, and to update antibiograms. Computerized decision support programs have been effective and successful methods of antimicrobial stewardship and can be a powerful tool in stewardship programs. Successful programs have reduced not only institutional resistance rates, but also morbidity, mortality, and cost.

Rule-based standardised switching of drugs at the interface between primary and tertiary care

INTRODUCTION

Changes in drug treatment are frequently mandatory with hospital admission and discharge because hospital drug formularies are generally restricted to about 3000 drugs as compared to the many times this number - 62,000 in Germany - that are commercially available. Without computerised support, the process involved with switching drugs to a corresponding generic or a therapeutic equivalent is time-consuming and error-prone.

METHODS

We have developed and tested a standardised interchange algorithm for subsequent implementation into a computerised decision support system that switches drugs to the corresponding generic or a therapeutic equivalent if they are not listed on the hospital drug formulary.

RESULTS

The algorithm was retrospectively applied to the medication regimens of 120 patients (774 prescribed drugs containing 886 active ingredients) at their time of admission to surgical wards. Of the prescribed drugs, 52.8% (409/774) were part of the hospital drug formulary, thereby rendering a switch unnecessary. The 365 drugs not listed consisted of 392 active ingredients that were successfully switched to a corresponding generic (84.7%) or a therapeutic equivalent (10.2%). No specific switching procedures were defined for only 2.3% (20/886) of the active ingredients. In these cases, the drugs were either discontinued (4/20) or special drug classes, current diseases or co-medication required manual switching (8/20), or the drugs were continued unchanged and ordered from a wholesaler (8/20).

CONCLUSION

Using a standardised interchange algorithm, pre-admission drug regimens can successfully be switched to drugs on a hospital drug formulary. These findings suggest that a computerised decision support system will likely be useful to support this important practice.

Pharmacist recognition of and adherence to medication-use policies and safety practices

PURPOSE

Pharmacist recognition of and adherence to medication-use policies and safety practices were assessed.

METHODS

Simulation testing was used to assess the performance of pharmacists in hypothetical scenarios simulating real-life situations. Fifty test case medication orders were developed, some requiring specific intervention and some requiring no special action. Orders were classified into four categories: those posing safety concerns n ( = 16), those with formulary and product standardization issues (n = 4), those with pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committee restrictions (n = 4), and those requiring no special action (n = 26). Potential barriers to compliance were identified by the project team and the orders categorized accordingly. The orders were processed by 25 pharmacists using a simulation testing procedure. Data were analyzed by pharmacists' demographics, order category, and perceived barriers to compliance.

RESULTS

Pharmacists were correctly able to recognize 77.3% of test orders: 67.3% with safety concerns, 98.9% with formulary issues, and 98.5% with restrictions. Appropriate action was taken with 74.2% of test orders: 64.5% of safety orders, 96.6% of formulary orders, and 92.4% of restriction orders. There was no correlation between pharmacists' performance and demographic characteristics. The two barriers to correct response identified most often were ambiguous responsibility and low perceived level of importance.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists generally recognized and took appropriate action with simulated medication orders that contained problems related to formulary or P&T committee restrictions. They were less able to recognize and act appropriately on orders with safety-related problems. Ambiguous responsibility and low perceived importance were the most significant factors contributing to noncompliance with P&T committee policies and guidelines.

The impact of formulary replacement of sildenafil by vardenafil at a local VA hospital

The National Veterans Administration (VA) changed its formulary agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction from sildenafil to vardenafil in January 2006 for economic reasons. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of this formulary change on the patients at a local VA hospital. All non-formulary requests for sildenafil between January 2006 and September 2006 were reviewed. A total of 169 non-formulary requests were made for sildenafil while 7657 patients filled vardenafil prescriptions. Overall, the formulary change from sildenafil to vardenafil appeared to be well tolerated by the vast majority of patients at this local VA hospital. The substantial cost savings to the VA seem to be justified by the minimal adverse effects on men treated for erectile dysfunction.

Establishing a hospital program to improve antimicrobial use, control bacterial resistance and contain healthcare costs: the University of Louisville experience

Antimicrobials have been used in excess for decades. As a result, antimicrobial resistance and cost have increased. In response to this growing national problem, hospital antimicrobial teams were recom-mended in 1988, but few institutions have invested in comprehensive, interdisciplinary programs. The division of infectious diseases at the University of Louisville School of Medicine was a leader in 1990 by establishing an antimicrobial team at the University of Louisville Hospital and Veterans Affairs Hospital. This manuscript reviews the activities of the antimicrobial teams to create antimicrobial guidelines, evaluate antimicrobial use, and provide feedback to physicians. It also summarizes the successful impact the teams have had on optimizing antimicrobial use in the hospital by improving compliance with the guidelines, controlling resistant organisms, and preventing escalation of antimicrobial cost over the years.

Antibacterial treatment strategies in hospitalized patients: what role for pharmacoeconomics?

Antimicrobial agents continue to account for a significant portion of institutional pharmaceutical expenditures. Pharmacoeconomic analysis is a valuable tool in assessing antibacterial agents for their place in institutional formularies. This article reviews various types of pharmacoeconomic analyses, their respective limitations, and their roles in the antibacterial formulary decision-making process. We also discuss the current state of the antibacterial pharmacoeconomic literature, including the economic impact of antimicrobial resistance.

An informatics approach to assess pediatric pharmacotherapy: design and implementation of a hospital drug utilization system

Drug utilization in the inpatient setting can provide a mechanism to assess drug prescribing trends, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of hospital formularies and examine subpopulations for which prescribing habits may be different. Such data can be used to correlate trends with time-dependent or seasonal changes in clinical event rates or the introduction of new pharmaceuticals. It is now possible to provide a robust, dynamic analysis of drug utilization in a large pediatric inpatient setting through the creation of a Web-based hospital drug utilization system that retrieves source data from our accounting database. The production implementation provides a dynamic and historical account of drug utilization at the authors' institution. The existing application can easily be extended to accommodate a multi-institution environment. The creation of a national or even global drug utilization network would facilitate the examination of geographical and/or socioeconomic influences in drug utilization and prescribing practices in general.

Can drug utilization help in promoting the more rational use of medicine? Experiences from Western Nepal

Drug utilization research describes the extent, nature and determinants of drug use in populations and aims to facilitate the more rational use of medicines. The departments of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy at the Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal are committed to promoting the more rational use of medicines. The departments run a Drug Information Center and a Pharmacovigilance Center in the teaching hospital. Over the last eight years, the departments have conducted drug utilization studies in the teaching hospital and the community. A few of these were of the intervention type and drug use was studied before and after the intervention. Members of the departments are on the hospital Drug and Therapeutics Committee. Educational initiatives to improve prescribing have been carried out in a few instances. Restricting the number of brands in the hospital pharmacy and creation of a hospital drug list has been carried out. The impact of these initiatives has been studied only in a few cases. Generic prescribing was found to be low. The educational initiatives to improve prescribing had only limited success. The hospital is in the process of framing antimicrobial use guidelines for various departments. A hospital formulary is under preparation. The influence of drug utilization studies on the prescribing patterns has been low to moderate. The department of Clinical Pharmacy runs a Medication Counseling Center in the hospital and teaches appropriate use of medicines to patients. The studies and initiatives to promote the more rational use of medicines should be continued and strengthened.

Survey of hospitals for guidelines, policies, and protocols for anticoagulants

PURPOSE

A survey of community hospitals that are part of a national group purchasing organization (GPO) was conducted to assess the formulary status of currently available anticoagulants, assess the current status of anticoagulant prescribing guidelines and the existing scope of such guidelines, and identify perceptions about the appropriateness of the use of anticoagulants in community hospitals in the United States.

METHODS

A Web-based survey of acute care hospitals that were members of a leading health care resource management and GPO was conducted. The survey was sent to 224 hospitals.

RESULTS

Of 224 hospitals, 127 participated in the survey, a response rate of 59.6%. Warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and enoxaparin were the anticoagulants most commonly included (>80%) on the hospitals' drug formularies. Guidelines relating to the use of UFH and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) existed in approximately 87.4% and 55.1% of responding hospitals, respectively, followed by warfarin and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) (approximately 44.1% and 30.7%, respectively). Among hospitals without guidelines, 78.2%, 72.1%, 65.4%, 50.0%, and 41.4% reported that such guidelines would be useful if they included LMWHs, warfarin, DTIs, UFH, and fondaparinux, respectively. Guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), appropriate drug selection, and dosing for VTE prophylaxis and treatment existed in 59.8%, 53.5%, and 43.3% of the hospitals, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study found that a sizable percentage of the responding community hospitals did not have guidelines, protocols, or policies related to the use of anticoagulants. Further, those hospitals without such guidelines commonly reported a need for clinical practice guidelines.

Impact of hospital formularies on fluoroquinolone prescribing in emergency departments

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors associated with fluoroquinolone prescribing among adults receiving antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) in emergency departments.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 8 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and 7 nonfederal US hospitals. At each hospital, we randomly sampled 200 ARI visits with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision discharge diagnoses for nonspecific upper respiratory infections, acute bronchitis, pharyngitis, sinusitis, and pneumonia between November 1, 2003, and February 29, 2004. Patient and provider factors associated with each visit were extracted from medical records. System characteristics were obtained by surveying pharmacy directors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate independent predictors of fluoroquinolone prescribing.

RESULTS

Fluoroquinolones accounted for 14% of these prescriptions. At hospitals with at least 1 unrestricted fluoroquinolone on formulary (n = 12), the average fluoroquinolone prescription rate was 17%, compared with a 6% prescription rate at hospitals where fluoroquinolone access was restricted by the hospital formulary (n = 3) (P < .0001). Factors associated with increased fluoroquinolone prescription rates were hospital admission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1, 3.1) and the diagnoses of acute bronchitis (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.3, 4.2), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.2, 5.6), and pneumonia (OR = 6.4; 95% CI = 3.3, 12.4). Restricted hospital status was associated with decreased fluoroquinolones accounted for 14% of the antibiotic prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

Hospital formulary policies represent a potentially important target for influencing outpatient drug prescribing in emergency departments.

Programme of stepping down from twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy for symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease associated with a formulary change at a VA medical center

BACKGROUND

In July 2001, our Veterans' Affairs hospital changed its formulary proton pump inhibitor (PPI) from lansoprazole to rabeprazole. All patients previously receiving lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily were switched to rabeprazole 20 mg once daily.

AIM

To determine if patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), who were previously managed on lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, could be maintained on rabeprazole 20 mg once daily.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and thirty-five patients had received lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily for at least 12 months before the formulary change. Medical records were reviewed for 12 months before and after the formulary change.

RESULTS

There were 432 men and three women with a mean age of 66.7 years (range: 38-91). Two hundred and twelve patients were excluded. Of the remaining 223, 111 (50%) were maintained successfully on rabeprazole 20 mg once daily. Twenty-three (10%) stayed off all acid suppression during follow-up. The number of endoscopies and clinic visits did not significantly change during the follow-up. Fifty-six percent who had erosive oesophagitis failed a dose taper compared with 31% of those with endoscopy-negative GERD (P<0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients receiving twice daily PPI therapy for GERD could be maintained on once daily PPI or no acid suppression for 12 months of follow-up. Dose reduction was more successful in those without erosive oesophagitis.

Programme of stepping down from twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy for symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease associated with a formulary change at a VA medical center

BACKGROUND

In July 2001, our Veterans' Affairs hospital changed its formulary proton pump inhibitor (PPI) from lansoprazole to rabeprazole. All patients previously receiving lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily were switched to rabeprazole 20 mg once daily.

AIM

To determine if patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), who were previously managed on lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, could be maintained on rabeprazole 20 mg once daily.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and thirty-five patients had received lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily for at least 12 months before the formulary change. Medical records were reviewed for 12 months before and after the formulary change.

RESULTS

There were 432 men and three women with a mean age of 66.7 years (range: 38-91). Two hundred and twelve patients were excluded. Of the remaining 223, 111 (50%) were maintained successfully on rabeprazole 20 mg once daily. Twenty-three (10%) stayed off all acid suppression during follow-up. The number of endoscopies and clinic visits did not significantly change during the follow-up. Fifty-six percent who had erosive oesophagitis failed a dose taper compared with 31% of those with endoscopy-negative GERD (P<0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients receiving twice daily PPI therapy for GERD could be maintained on once daily PPI or no acid suppression for 12 months of follow-up. Dose reduction was more successful in those without erosive oesophagitis.