Effect of High-Dose Baclofen on Agitation-Related Events Among Patients With Unhealthy Alcohol Use Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Unhealthy alcohol use can lead to agitation in the intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether high-dose baclofen reduces agitation-related events compared with placebo in patients with unhealthy alcohol use receiving mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted in 18 ICUs in France recruited adults receiving mechanical ventilation who met criteria for unhealthy alcohol use. Patients were enrolled from June 2016 to February 2018; the last follow-up was in May 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Baclofen (n = 159), adjusted from 50 to 150 mg per day based on estimated glomerular filtration rate, or placebo (n = 155) during mechanical ventilation up to a maximum of 15 days before gradual dose reduction over 3 to 6 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least 1 agitation-related event over the treatment period. Secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 314 patients who were randomized (mean age, 57 years; 60 [17.2%] women), 313 (99.7%) completed the trial. There was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 agitation-related event in the baclofen group vs the placebo group (31 [19.7%] vs 46 [29.7%]; difference, -9.93% [95% CI, -19.45% to -0.42%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.99]). Of 18 prespecified secondary end points, 14 were not significantly different. Compared with the placebo group, the baclofen group had a significantly longer median length of mechanical ventilation (9 vs 8 days; difference, 2.00 [95% CI, 0.00-3.00]; hazard ratio [HR] for extubation, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.60-0.97]) and stay in the ICU (14 vs 11 days; difference, 2.00 [95% CI, 0.00-4.00]; HR for discharge, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.90]). At 28 days, there was no significant difference in mortality in the baclofen vs placebo group (25.3% vs 21.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.72-2.13]). Delayed awakening (no eye opening at 72 hours after cessation of sedatives and analgesics) occurred in 14 patients (8.9%) in the baclofen group vs 3 (1.9%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with unhealthy alcohol use receiving mechanical ventilation, treatment with high-dose baclofen, compared with placebo, resulted in a statistically significant reduction in agitation-related events. However, considering the modest effect and the totality of findings for the secondary end points and adverse events, further research is needed to determine the possible role of baclofen in this setting and to potentially optimize dosing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02723383.

Baclofen for alcohol withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Baclofen shows potential for rapidly reducing symptoms of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in people with alcoholism. Treatment with baclofen is easy to manage and rarely produces euphoria or other pleasant effects, or craving for the drug. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2015, Issue 4.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of baclofen for people with AWS.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to March 2017: the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. We also searched registers of ongoing trials. We handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials, and sought information from researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and relevant trial authors about unpublished or uncompleted trials. We placed no restrictions on language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating baclofen versus placebo or any other treatment for people with AWS. We excluded uncontrolled, non-randomised, or quasi-randomised trials. We included both parallel group and cross-over studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs with 141 randomised participants. We did not perform meta-analyses due to the different control interventions. For the comparison of baclofen and placebo (1 study, 31 participants), there was no significant difference in Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale, Revised (CIWA-Ar) scores (very low quality evidence). For the comparison of baclofen and diazepam (1 study, 37 participants), there was no significant difference in CIWA-Ar scores (very low quality evidence), adverse events (risk difference (RD) 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10 to 0.10; very low quality evidence), dropouts (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10; very low quality evidence), and dropouts due to adverse events (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10; very low quality evidence). For the comparison of baclofen and chlordiazepoxide (1 study, 60 participants), there was no significant difference in CIWA-Ar scores (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.30; very low quality evidence), global improvement (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.23; very low quality evidence), adverse events (RD 2.50, 95% CI 0.88 to 7.10; very low quality of evidence), dropouts (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.06; very low quality evidence), and dropouts due to adverse events (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.06; very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No conclusions can be drawn about the efficacy and safety of baclofen for the management of alcohol withdrawal because we found insufficient and very low quality evidence.

Baclofen for alcohol withdrawal

BACKGROUND

The treatment baclofen shows potential for rapidly reducing symptoms of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in people with alcoholism. Treatment with baclofen is easy to manage and rarely produces euphoria or other pleasant effects, or craving for the drug. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of baclofen for people with AWS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register (searched 13 January 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2015), EMBASE (1980 to January 2015), and CINAHL (1982 to January 2015). We also searched registers of ongoing trials, including ClinicalTrials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, and the European Clinical Trials Database. At the same time, we handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials, and sought information from researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and relevant trial authors about unpublished or uncompleted trials. We placed no restrictions on language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating baclofen versus placebo or any other treatment for people with AWS. We excluded uncontrolled, non-randomised, or quasi-randomised trials. We included both parallel group and cross-over studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed references retrieved for possible inclusion. Any disagreements were resolved by an independent party. We contacted study authors for additional information where needed. We collected adverse effects information from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Two RCTs with a total of 81 participants were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. One study suggested that both baclofen and diazepam significantly decreased the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale, Revised (CIWA-Ar) score, without any significant difference between the two interventions. The other study showed no significant difference in CIWA-Ar score between baclofen and placebo, but a significantly decreased dependence on high-dose benzodiazepines with baclofen compared to placebo. Only one study reported on the safety of baclofen, without any side effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for recommending baclofen for AWS is insufficient. We therefore need more well-designed RCTs to prove its efficacy and safety.

[What can be expected today of pharmacotherapy in the Alcohol Use Disorders?]

During the last past years, numerous drug have been proposed to treat Alcohol Use Disorders. Besides classical drugs as acomprosate or naltrexone, new compounds are developed in this new indication. They are used in substitution therapies (baclofen), either when the aim of the treatment is total abstinence from alcohol or as an aid for craving reduction facilitating a "controlled drinking", or also for the maintaining of abstinence (nalmefene). Those drugs, availaible in diferent countries, are now marketed in France (nalmefene). As yet, baclofen may be prescribed in France by the mean of a Temporary Utilisation Recommandation, according to the settlement of the National Medicament Agency. Despite the emphasis of some spectacular effects of baclofen, highly publicised by the media and some enthousiastic practitioners, the drug dosage/frequency has to be assessed by two ongoing controlled studies. The pharmacotherapy remains, however, only one element in the treatment of alcoholism, a complex biopsychosocial disorder. Various forms of psychotherapy remain necessary, the pharmacotherapy being only one, sometimes useful, additionnal treatment.

[Efficacy of alcohol withdrawal syndrome therapy in patients from Independent Public Hospital for Mental Diseases in Miedzyrzecz]

Consumption of alcohol is a serious social problem. Research on alcohol addicts prove that its consumption affects the physical and mental health of drinking person, his/her family and the social dimension (eg. crime, unemployment, poverty). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AW) in patients of 2417 Unit of Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndromes of Independent Public Hospital for Mental Diseases (SPSNPCH) in Miedzyrzecz. The study was conducted in 122 of 24/7 Unit of Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndromes (SPSNPCH) treated from January to March 2015. Patients during hospitalization were subjected to intensive pharmacotherapy of AW (Stage I) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (Stage II). Of the group of 122 people starting treatment Stage I was completed by 112 patients (90%); 10 patients (8%) have been discharged at their own request. The participation in Stage II was consented only by 54 patients, of which 6 (4%) withdrew from this form of therapy. Full two-stage treatment consisting of pharmacotherapy of AWS and then psychotherapy was completed only by 48 (39%) patients.

Baclofen for alcohol withdrawal

BACKGROUND

The treatment baclofen can rapidly reduce symptoms of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in alcoholic patients, with a significant reduction in the cost. Baclofen is easy to manage, and rare euphoria, craving and other pleasant effects are reported by patients treated with baclofen.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of baclofen for patients with AWS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (October 2012), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2012), EMBASE (1980 to October 2012) and CINAHL (1982 to October 2012). We also searched registers of ongoing trials, for example ClinicalTrials.gov, Controlled-trials.com, EUDRACT, etc. At the same time, we handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials, and contacted researchers, pharmaceutical companies and relevant trial authors seeking information about unpublished or uncompleted trials. All searches included the non-English language literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating baclofen versus placebo or any other treatment for patients with AWS. Uncontrolled, non-randomized or quasi-randomized trials were excluded. Both parallel group and cross-over design were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed references retrieved for possible inclusion. All disagreements were resolved by an independent party. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of 113 references from all electronic databases searched excluding duplicates. After screening of titles and abstracts, full papers of 10 studies were obtained and assessed for eligibility. Finally, two RCTs with 81 participants were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. Regarding the efficacy, one study suggested that both baclofen and diazepam significantly decreased the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale Revised (CIWA-Ar) score, without any significant difference between the two interventions. The other study showed no significant difference in CIWA-Ar score between baclofen and placebo but a significantly decreased dependence on high-dose benzodiazepines with baclofen compared to placebo. Meanwhile, only one study reported the safety outcomes and there were no side effects in either the baclofen or diazepam groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for recommending baclofen for AWS is insufficient. More well designed RCTs are needed to prove its efficacy and safety.

[Severe bilateral keratomalacia]

In contrast to developing countries, xerophthalmia is rather rare in developed countries. Malnutrition (e.g. in mentally deficient or psychiatric patients), chronic liver diseases (e.g. due to alcoholism), or bowel surgery can be reasons for vitamin A deficiency in developed countries. The prodromal stage of hypovitaminosis A is characterized by nyctalopia, which often manifests subclinically. Longer lasting and severe cases of vitamin A deficiency may be complicated by the occurrence of keratinizing metaplasia in the cornea and conjunctiva, xerosis, keratomalacia or blindness.

Correlates of alcohol use in adults with ADHD and comorbid alcohol use disorders: exploratory analysis of a placebo-controlled trial of atomoxetine

BACKGROUND

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance use disorder are often comorbid in adults. The effects of ADHD treatment on comorbid alcohol use disorder have not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

To assess correlates of ADHD and alcohol use outcomes in ADHD with comorbid alcohol use disorders, via a post-hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of a previously conducted, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of recently abstinent adults.

METHODS

Adults who had ADHD and alcohol use disorders and were abstinent for 4-30 days were randomized to daily atomoxetine 25-100 mg (mean final dose = 89.9 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. Changes in ADHD symptoms from baseline to endpoint were assessed using the ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) total score, alcohol use by the timeline followback method, and alcohol cravings by the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale.

RESULTS

Of 147 subjects receiving atomoxetine (n = 72) or placebo (n = 75) in the primary study, 80 (54%) completed 12 weeks (n = 32 atomoxetine; n = 48 placebo). Improvements in ADHD symptoms on the AISRS correlated significantly with decreases in alcohol cravings (Pearson's r = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.43; p = 0.002), and the correlation was most notable with atomoxetine (r = 0.29; CI [0.04 - 0.51]; p = 0.023) rather than with placebo (r = 0.24; CI [0.00-0.46]; p = 0.055). On-treatment drinking levels correlated with AISRS scores (r = 0.12; CI [0.05 -0.19]; p = 0.001). Relapse to alcohol abuse significantly correlated with worse ADHD symptoms on 15 of 18 items of the AISRS in the placebo group (p < 0.05 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

No baseline predictor (other than degree of sobriety) of alcohol use or ADHD outcomes emerged. ADHD symptom improvements correlated significantly with reductions in alcohol cravings, and relapse to alcohol abuse correlated significantly with worsening of most ADHD symptoms in the placebo group, but not in the atomoxetine group. This post-hoc subgroup analysis is of a hypothesis-generating nature, and the generalizability of the findings may be limited by exclusion of adults with common ADHD comorbidities from the base study. Further, prospective clinical trials in larger and more heterogeneous patient populations are warranted to confirm or reject these preliminary associations. TRIAL REGISTRATION (BASE STUDY): ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00190957.

Intensity of symptoms from alcohol withdrawal in alcohol-dependent patients: comparison between smokers and non-smokers

BACKGROUND

In patients with a dual dependence on alcohol and tobacco, the spontaneous discourse among doctors is not to encourage them to consider preparing to give up both substances. The argument put forward is that withdrawal would be more difficult. We wanted to compare the intensity of withdrawal symptoms in patients hospitalised for alcohol detoxification between smokers and non-smokers.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

We compared patients hospitalised for alcohol detoxification who smoke versus non-smokers who received replacement therapy through benzodiazepines and not nicotine replacement. The blood pressure and the cardiac frequency measure on the first day of hospitalisation, the doses of Diazepam dispensed on the first day, and the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale Revised (CIWA-Ar) score on the second day were compared.

RESULTS

A trend emerged whereby smoking patients undergoing alcohol detoxification showed higher blood pressure, higher cardiac frequency and required higher doses of benzodiazepines on the first day of hospitalisation. Patients who smoke also had higher CIWA-Ar scores on the second day of hospitalisation.

DISCUSSION

From a physiological point of view, the intensity of the symptoms of alcoholic withdrawal seems to be greater in hospitalised patients who smoke vs. non-smokers in the first two days. Does giving up both substances at the same time result in fewer withdrawal symptoms? And in this case, should a double replacement be recommended: benzodiazepines and nicotine replacement therapy?

CONCLUSION

To be able to refine the recommendations on alcohol-tobacco dual withdrawal programmes, other studies are needed to compare giving up both substances with or without nicotine replacement.

Baclofen for alcohol withdrawal

BACKGROUND

The treatment of baclofen can rapidly reduce symptoms of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in alcoholic patients, with a significant reduction in the cost. Baclofen is easily manageable, what's more, no patient treated with baclofen reported euphoria or other pleasant effects caused by the drug and no subject reported any degree of craving for the drug.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of baclofen for patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (September 2010), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2010), EMBASE (1980 to September 2010), and CINAHL (1982 to September 2010). We also searched the following registers of ongoing trials, e.g. Clinicaltrials.gov, Controlled trials.com, EUDRACT, etc. At the same time, we handsearched the references quoted in the identified trials, contact researchers, pharmaceutical companies and relevant trial authors seeking information about unpublished or incomplete trials. All searches included non-English language literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating baclofen versus placebo or any other treatment for patients with AWS. Uncontrolled, non-randomised or quasi-randomised trials were excluded. Both parallel group and cross-over design were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed references retrieved for possible inclusion. All disagreements were resolved by an independent party. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of 82 references from all electronic databases searched excluding duplicate. After screening of titles and abstracts, full papers of 7 studies were obtained and assessed for eligibility. Finally, only one study met the inclusion criteria, with 37 participants.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence of recommending baclofen for AWS is insufficient. More well designed RCTs are demanded to further prove its efficacy and safety.

Stopping insulin and achieving a good metabolic control in a heavy drinker five months after stopping alcohol

In this case study, we describe a 25 year-old male who showed the symptoms of diabetes after a period of heavy drinking. (HbA1c=13%). Treatment was started with 120 units of insulin. After stopping alcohol consumption and taking an appropriate diet, insulin was tapered down. Five months after the start of treatment, insulin was stopped (HbA1c=5%). The results showed that he was in a good metabolic control after 18 months (HbA1c=5.9%).

New developments for the pharmacological treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. A focus on non-benzodiazepine GABAergic medications

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) can be a life-threatening condition affecting some alcohol-dependent patients who abruptly discontinue or decrease their alcohol consumption. The main objectives of the clinical management of AWS include: to decrease the severity of symptoms, prevent more severe withdrawal clinical manifestations and facilitate entry of the patient into a treatment program in order to attempt to achieve and maintain long-term abstinence from alcohol. At present, benzodiazepines represent the drugs of choice in the treatment of AWS. However, in line with the possible side effects and addictive properties related to benzodiazepine use, there is growing evidence to suggest that non-benzodiazepine GABAergic compounds represent promising medications in the treatment of alcohol-dependent patients. This review focuses on research into non-benzodiazepine GABAergic medications for the treatment of AWS. Among them, carbamazepine, gabapentin and valproic acid are the most studied. The studies on carbamazepine seem to be the most compelling. Preliminary data have also suggested the possible utility of baclofen and topiramate, although further evidence is needed. The promising results in terms of both safety and efficacy are reported. However, we also note the need of more methodologically controlled studies on a greater number of patients, involving more complicated forms of AWS.

Gabapentin's acute effect on mood profile -- a controlled study on patients with alcohol withdrawal

RATIONALE

Delayed beneficial effects of gabapentin on mood were frequently reported in various patient populations. This is the first controlled study which addressed acute effects of gabapentin on mood.

METHODS

Analysis of the German version of Profile of Mood States (POMS) throughout a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of gabapentin on acute alcohol withdrawal [Bonnet, U., Banger, M., Leweke, F.M., Specka, M., Müller, B.W., Hashemi, T., Nyhuis, P.W., Kutscher, S., Burtscheidt, W., Gastpar, M. 2003. Treatment of acute alcohol withdrawal with gabapentin -- results from a controlled two-center trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol 23, 514-519]. In addition, subjective severity of alcohol withdrawal was determined by the Essen Self-Assessment of Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (ESA) to control effects of concurrent withdrawal on POMS. Ratings were performed at intake (baseline), day 1 (study medication 400 mg q.i.d.), day 2 (study medication 400 mg q.i.d.) and day 7 (no study medication).

RESULTS

Analyses could be performed on 46 out of 59 randomised subjects. Within the first two days of the study, a significant stronger increase in the POMS-vigour subscore occurred in the gabapentin group. A subgroup analysis suggests that gabapentin's effect on vigour largely results from a stronger improvement of vigour in a small group of 11 patients with co-morbid mild depression (according to ICD-10: dysthymia or depressive adjustment disorder). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups regarding the other POMS-subscores (dejection, fatigue, anger) ruling out an overall fast effect on mood. Moreover, ESA-measures were not significantly altered indicating a missing effect of 400 mg gabapentin q.i.d. on acute alcohol withdrawal itself. After tapering off study medication, no more significant differences between gabapentin and placebo group were observed on vigour, strongly suggesting that the initial effect results from a pharmacological gabapentin action.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin selectively accelerated the improvement of the vigour-subscore of patients with acute alcohol withdrawal within 48 h. This effect was independent from the subjective severity of withdrawal and especially marked in patients with co-morbid mild depression.

An overview of medications for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal and alcohol dependence with an emphasis on the use of older and newer anticonvulsants

There is a growing interest in the development of new pharmacological tools for treating alcohol withdrawal and dependence. A number of anticonvulsants including valproate and carbamazepine have been shown to be safe and effective alternatives to benzodiazepines for treating alcohol withdrawal. These agents are relatively safe, are free from demonstrated abuse liability, and do not usually potentiate the psychomotor and cognitive effects of alcohol. For the treatment of alcohol dependence, there is a growing literature on the utility of medications that have neurochemical effects at opioid, serotonergic, GABAergic, and glutamate receptors. Furthermore, as a class of medication, there appears to be a growing interest in investigating the utility of novel anticonvulsants such as topiramate for the treatment of alcohol dependence.

A Retrospective Chart Review Comparing Tiagabine and Benzodiazepines for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal

Although benzodiazepines are the standard of care in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal, several studies have suggested that anticonvulsants may be equally effective at alleviating alcohol withdrawal symptoms and may pose less of a risk of causing rebound of symptoms which could contribute to relapse. This report compares treatment outcomes for patients (N=13) treated for alcohol withdrawal with either the anticonvulsant tiagabine or the benzodiazepines oxazepam and lorazepam. The Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-revised (CIWA-Ar) was utilized to gauge alcohol withdrawal symptoms over the course of the study. When possible, follow-up data was obtained on alcohol use post-treatment. Both benzodiazepines and tiagabine appeared to reduce CIWA-Ar scores at about the same magnitude. There was a trend for tiagabine patients to have less post-detoxification drinking (Fisher exact test, p = 0.12). The reduction in alcohol withdrawal symptoms and decreased tendency to relapse observed in patients treated with the anticonvulsant tiagabine suggests that a double-blind, placebo controlled trial may be warranted.

The potential beneficial effect of leptin on an experimental model of hyperlipidemia, induced by chronic ethanol treatment

BACKGROUND

Obesity is known to predispose individuals to liver disease by increasing hepatic sensitivity to endotoxin. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of mouse recombinant leptin on food intake, body weight, hepatic and plasma lipids and lipoproteins in alcohol-induced liver injury.

METHOD

Male Swiss mice weighing 28-32 g were administered ethanol (6.32 g x kg(-1) body weight, p.o.) for the first 30 days. Subsequently, ethanol-fed mice were given intraperitoneal injections of exogenous leptin (230 microg x kg(-1) body weight, i.p.) every alternate day for 15 days. At the end of the total experimental period of 45 days, plasma concentrations of total cholesterol, free fatty acids, triglycerides, lipoprotein lipase and lipoproteins were measured.

RESULTS

Exogenous leptin injections to alcohol-fed mice significantly (P<0.05) inhibited the rise in hepatic and plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations as compared with those of the unsupplemented ethanol fed mice. Food intake and average body weight at the end of the experimental period was significantly decreased on leptin administration.

CONCLUSION

Chronic administration of exogenous mouse recombinant leptin prevents the rise in lipids and lipoprotein concentrations significantly in an animal model of alcohol-induced hyperlipidemia.