Screening for bladder cancer using urine-based tumor markers

Bladder cancer screening differs from routine detection of bladder cancer in patients with symptoms, such as hematuria, or a history of bladder cancer. The ultimate goal of cancer screening is to decrease cancer-related mortality by detecting disease prior to the time that the disease would normally prompt evaluation from symptoms. There are several features of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder which make screening for this disease an attractive alternative to the current approach to this disease. The disease targets a defined population and survival for patients with this disease is strongly associated with disease stage at presentation. In addition, quick, easy, and painless screening tests are theoretically possible using tumor-related markers because of the direct exposure of cancer cells to urine. Indeed, recent insights into the biology of bladder cancer initiation and progression have resulted in the identification of several urine-based markers which have promise for detecting the presence of bladder cancer. Nevertheless, adoption of screening programs prior to establishing evidence of effectiveness and large-scale financial considerations has substantial damaging consequences. This article reviews the current literature regarding screening for bladder cancer using urine-based markers.

Urine-based biomarkers for the early detection and surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Bladder cancer has a very high frequency of recurrence and therefore requires lifelong surveillance, traditionally consisting of serial cystoscopy and cytology. These tests are both invasive and expensive, with considerable inter-user and inter-institutional variability. In addition, the sensitivity of cytology in detecting low-grade tumors is low. Therefore, there has been active investigation into urinary biomarkers that can either supplement or supplant these tests. At this point there are only six urine-based tests that are FDA-approved in bladder cancer surveillance, but a wide variety of other biomarkers are being studied. In this review, we examine the natural history of bladder cancer as well as the rationale and performance of an ideal urinary biomarker. The authors describe the FDA-approved biomarkers such as Bladder Tumor Antigen, ImmunoCyt, Nuclear Matrix Protein-22, and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, as well as the most promising investigational tests (i.e., Urinary bladder cancer test, BLCA-1, BLCA-4, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase, Lewis X antigen, microsatellite analysis, Quanticyt, soluble Fas, Survivin, and telomerase). The biological foundation, methodologies, and diagnostic performance of the biomarkers are discussed. The characteristics of the biomarkers are compared to urine cytology. At this time, urine biomarkers are utilized in a variety of clinical situations but their role is not well defined. The goal of identifying an optimal marker that will replace cystoscopy and/or cytology is still ongoing.

Focus on urinary bladder cancer markers: a review

Finding and development of new bladder cancer markers is still a very dynamic field. Because of the mass of all these markers it is impossible to report all of them. This paper reviews the role of bladder cancer markers in diagnosis and highlights the most important biomarkers studied and reported recently. A medline based literature search was performed to examine the field of bladder cancer markers. Major topics focus on selected bladder cancer markers from nearly all categories of the wide field of bladder cancer markers: Hematuria, FISH, FGFR3, SURVIVIN, u-PAR, TP53 mutation, HER-2/neu, TPA, NMP22, CK-19, CK-20, CYFRA 21-1. The use and clinical importance as diagnostic help are discussed. In this review a highlight to some of the most important markers was made. Further determination of recurrence and progression marker will contribute to establish better treatments for the individual patient. Molecular staging of urological tumors will allow selecting cases that will require systemic treatment. It is necessary and important to integrate under the same objectives basic and clinical research.

Role of urinary NMP-22 combined with urine cytology in follow-up surveillance of recurring superficial bladder urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine efficacy and utility of NMP-22 in follow-up of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC) and compare NMP-22 as a single evaluating test vs combination with cytology.

STUDY DESIGN

Ninety-four consecutive urine cytology samples of bladder UC were identified. Patients received follow-up urine cytology, NMP-22 testing and cystoscopy with surgical biopsy.

RESULTS

NMP-22 specificity was 100%, sensitivity 45%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 87%. NMP-22 showed lower sensitivity for high-grade lesions and higher for low-grade lesions. Cytologic diagnosis had a high inconclusive rate; when regarded as positive, it resulted in 75% sensitivity, 58% specificity, 33% PPV and 89% NPV. NMP-22 correctly classified 60% of false negative cases diagnosed by cytology with low-grade UC and clarified 27 inconclusive cytologic diagnoses. NMP-22 misclassified 9 cases as false negative, all with high-grade UC; all were correctly identified on cytology as true positive. Combined interpretation showed 90% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 75% PPV and 98% NPV.

CONCLUSION

NMP-22 complements cytology by its higher sensitivity for low-grade lesions; its values are not affected by bacillus Calmette Guérin therapy changes, which are limiting in cytology. Combined interpretation of NMP-22 and cytology shows promise as an effective, noninvasive method for surveillance of UC.

Urine concentration of nuclear matrix protein 22 for diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of bladder

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of urine nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) level in detection of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 76 patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent TCC and 75 controls without urinary tract disorders participated in this study. A urine sample was obtained for measurement of the NMP22 level using the enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. The resulted values were evaluated in comparison with the results of pathologic examination.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients with TCC of the bladder and 75 volunteers without TCC were enrolled in the study. The mean level of urine NMP22 had an increasing trend associated with tumor grade (P = .01) and tumor stage (P < .001). In participants without TCC, the mean urinary NMP22 level was 5.48 +/- 6.34 U/mL, while this value was 25.01 +/- 35.33 U/mL in patients with TCC of the bladder (P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of urine NMP22 for detection of TCC were 75.5%, 86.7%, 85.1%, 77.4%, and 80.8%, respectively. The sensitivity of NMP22 in detecting stage Ta tumors appeared to be low (31.3%), but for grade 1 tumors, the sensitivity was 66.7%.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of urine NMP22 is a noninvasive, highly sensitive, and specific method for detecting TCC of the bladder and estimating its grade and stage. Further studies can be helpful to determine whether it can be used in clinical practice.

Telomerase and other novel approaches to bladder cancer detection

The current protocols in place for bladder cancer screening are cystoscopy and urine cytology. Cytology does not have an adequate sensitivity in low-grade malignancy and has limited utility in the screening and management of bladder cancer patients. Urine tumor markers aimed at detection of cancer via voided urine are an attractive alternative to cytology. Currently, FDA-approved tumor marker assays lack the characteristics of an ideal test and have yet to revolutionize bladder cancer detection. Novel tumor markers, not yet FDA-approved, have the potential to change disease management algorithms that currently include voided urine cytology. Telomerase, an enzyme present in greater than 80% of all cancer cells, has the potential to be a successful bladder tumor marker for cancer surveillance and monitoring.

Comparisons of voided urine cytology, nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumor associated antigen tests for bladder cancer of geriatric male patients in Taiwan, China

AIM

To compare the results of bladder tumor associated antigen (BTA TRAK), nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP 22) and voided urine cytology (VUC) in detecting bladder cancer.

METHODS

A total of 135 elderly male and 50 healthy volunteers enrolled in this study were classified into three groups: (i) 93 patients with bladder cancer; (ii) 42 patients with urinary benign conditions; and (iii) 50 healthy volunteers. BTA TRAK and NMP 22 kits were used to detect bladder cancer. Voided urine cytology was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tests.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of cytology, BTA TRAK and NMP 22 were 24% and 97%, 51% and 73%, 78% and 73%, respectively. The level of NMP 22 increased with tumor grading. The BTA TRAK kit has the lowest sensitivity among the screening tests. The NMP 22 with the best sensitivity can be an adjunct to cytology for evaluating bladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

The NMP 22 test has a better correlation with the grading of the bladder cancer than BTA TRAK. As cytology units are typically not available in hospitals or in outpatient clinics, NMP 22 might be a promising tool for screening bladder cancer.

[Influence of the delay in urinary NMP22 preanalytical processing]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of the delay in urinary NMP22 preanalytical processing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-eight voided urine samples were taken: bladder cancer (14), urine tract infections (4), lithiasis (4), healthy volunteers (1), and with other no malignant bladder diseases (5). All samples, were maintained at environment temperature, and were processed according to the stabilization of parts of urine collected at 0, 30, 90 and 150 minutes. Samples were stored at 4 degrees C until its determination. NMP22 was determined with the IMMULITE One analyzer.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences for NMP22 levels between each different point of time studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Delay up to 2 hours and a half when we add stabilization solution to urine samples no affects NMP22 results. That thing, might provide more confidence and flexibility on quantitative immunoassays that required urine stabilization.

Voided Urinary Cytology in Bladder Cancer: Is It Time to Review the Indications?

OBJECTIVES

The sensitivity of voided urinary cytology has been reported as very low. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity and clinical utility of voided urinary cytology in the detection of various grades and stages of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder compared with the urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP-22) qualitative assay.

METHODS

From March 2004 to April 2006, all patients with TCC of the bladder receiving follow-up care and those presenting with gross hematuria were enrolled in this prospective study. These patients underwent urinary cytologic examination and NMP-22 qualitative assay. The diagnosis, determined from the cystoscopy findings and biopsy findings of the suspicious lesion, was accepted as the reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 127 patients had previously been diagnosed with bladder TCC and 69 were presenting for investigation of gross hematuria. A total of 52 cases of bladder TCC were diagnosed. The overall sensitivity of voided urine cytology and NMP-22 assay was 21.1% and 67.3%, respectively (P <0.001). The sensitivity of urinary cytology and urinary NMP-22 for well-differentiated tumors was 9.5% and 52.4%, respectively, and was 18.1% and 77.3%, respectively (P <0.001), in moderately differentiated tumors. The overall specificity of urinary cytology for TCC of the bladder was 98.6% and was greater than the specificity of NMP-22 (80.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that urinary cytology has a very low sensitivity and can be omitted in favor of NMP-22 in the follow-up of low-grade superficial bladder TCC.

[The diagnosis and monitoring of transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract through nuclear matrix protein 22]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the urinary nuclear matrix protein (NMP22) as an adjuvant diagnostic index for transitional cell carcinoma of urinary tract and monitoring the state of disease.

METHODS

Urinary samples were collected from 262 patients with transitional cell carcinoma, 198 non-transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract and 65 patients with benign diseases. Urinary NMP22 concentration was determined through enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

The urinary NMP22 concentration had significant difference among the three groups (Kruskal Wallis, chi(2) = 197.17 P < 0.001). The detection sensitivity and specificity of urinary NMP22 to transitional cell carcinoma were 71.37% and 87.69% respectively. The NMP22 concentration showed significant difference among three groups divided according to the pathological grade (Kruskal-Wallis test, chi(2) = 34.06 P < 0.01). The NMP22 concentration was significant lower in the recovery patients after the operation than the peoples of pre-operation and recurrence (Kruskal-Wallis test, chi(2) = 37.53, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MP22 is a helpful tumor marker for the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma and monitoring the state of illness with increased efficacy.

Intérêt des marqueurs urinaires dans le diagnostic et le suivi des tumeurs urothéliales de vessie

Urothelial bladder tumours require regular surveillance: cystoscopy associated with urine cytology are reference examinations. Several new markers currently under evaluation or already validated have recently been proposed to replace cytology and potentially reduce or even replace unnecessary cystoscopies. The biological fluid studied for all of these markers is the same as that of urine cytology, i.e. urine. The authors review the results of recent studies on these new urinary markers. The results of these markers demonstrate a better global sensitivity than urine cytology, but often a lower specificity. In the majority of cases, these tests are performed during patient follow-up (NMP22, BTA, CYFRA 21-l., etc.), but do not replace cystoscopy, due to a large number of false-positives. Other techniques, such as FISH, uCyt+ or microsatellites appear to be more promising, especially for the diagnosis of low-grade tumours. The best solution in practice may consist of a combination of several markers to further improve sensitivity and to decrease the false-positive rate responsible for unnecessary cystoscopies.

[Efficacy of detection of specific nuclear protein of matrix 22 in the urine in diagnosis of urinary bladder cancer]

The method is based on enzyme immunoassay for definition of nuclear matrix proteins forming part of the cell nuclear capsule. Quantity of these proteins increase 20-80 times in cancer of the bladder. A total of 83 patients participated in the trial. Group 1 consisted of 18 patients with primary bladder cancer, group 2 - of 26 patients with histologically confirmed bladder cancer recurrence. Group 3 - 19 patients with operated bladder cancer without recurrent disease for at least 6 months. Control group - 20 healthy donors. The test urine sample was placed into a test hole and 30 min later the result was assessed. Overall sensitivity of the method was 52% (p < 0.05). Sensitivity of the test increases with progression of the disease: T1 - 37%, T2 - 75%, T3 - 80% (p < 0.05); G1 - 30%, G2 - 50%, G3 87% (p < 0.05). Overall specificity was 95% (p < 0.05). Thus, nuclear matrix proteins 22 represent a prospective marker of the bladder cancer with high specificity and sensitivity in defining not only primary tumors but also the disease recurrences.

Variability in the Performance of Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 for the Detection of Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed variability in the diagnostic performance of NMP22 for detecting recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1, and/or CIS transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in a large international cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NMP22 voided urine levels were measured in 2,871 patients who underwent office cystoscopy for monitoring previous stage Ta, T1 and/or CIS transitional cell carcinoma at 12 participating institutions.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics varied considerably among institutions. Overall 1,045 patients (36.4%) had recurrent transitional cell carcinoma (range across institutions 13.6% to 54.3%). Median NMP22 was 5.5 U/ml (range across institutions 2.5 to 18.8). Of the patients 33.5% had grade III tumors (range across institutions 20.6% to 54.0%) and 22.4% had muscle invasive tumors (range across institutions 3.2% to 38.2%). Area under the ROC curve for bladder TCC detection was 0.735 (95% CI 0.715 to 0.755, range across institutions 0.676 to 0.889). The manufacturer recommended cutoff of 10 U/ml detected 57% of cases with a 19% false-positive rate. AUC for grade III and stage T2 or greater disease was 0.806 (95% CI 0.780 to 831) and 0.864 (95% CI 0.839 to 0.890), respectively. For each NMP22 cutoff NMP22 had higher sensitivity for detecting grade III and stage T2 or greater bladder transitional cell carcinoma than for detecting any cancer. No optimal cutoffs for detecting any or aggressive bladder transitional cell carcinoma could be derived based on NMP22 values.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a substantial degree of heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance of NMP22 applied to populations from different institutions. There is no clearly defined NMP22 cutoff but there is a continuum of risk for recurrence and progression.

Validation of the diagnostic value of NMP22 BladderChek test as a marker for bladder cancer by photodynamic diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the new "point-of-care" NMP22 BladderChek test compared to photodynamic diagnosis (PDD).

METHODS

Voided urine samples from 100 patients with suspicion of bladder cancer were collected to perform the NMP22 BladderChek test and voided urinary cytology. The nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) levels were measured by a lateral flow immunochromatographic qualitative assay, using 10 U/ml as the cut-off value. Subsequently patients underwent PDD, using 5-aminolevulinic acid or hexyl-aminolevulinate; previous bladder washings for cytology were collected. Sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 BladderChek test were compared with cytology and PDD.

RESULTS

Forty of the 100 patients had urothelial malignancies (22 pTa, 4 pT1, 3 pT2, 9 carcinoma in situ, 2 pTx; 16 G1, 6 G2, 18 G3). The sensitivity was 65% for the NMP22 BladderChek test, 44% for voided cytology, 75% for washing cytology, and 93% for PDD. Specificity rates were 40%, 78%, 62%, and 43%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 0.42, 0.58, 0.53, and 0.52 and the negative predictive values 0.63, 0.68, 0.82, and 0.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that the NMP22 BladderChek is an easily applied test, giving diagnostic findings within 30 min. However, validated by the highly sensitive PDD, the NMP22 BladderChek test demonstrates poor specificity and sensitivity and, therefore, cannot be recommended for screening or surveillance in daily clinical routine use. Further studies with careful patient selection are necessary to identify the patient population that might benefit from the NMP22 BladderChek test.

[The study of relationship between nuclear metrix protein 22 urinary level and the grade and stage of bladder transitional cell carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between nuclear matrix protein (NMP) 22 urinary level and the grade and stage of bladder transitional cell carcinoma.

METHODS

From June 1999 to March 2005 642 patients underwent NMP22 test, and then the test by cystoscope and pathology were performed in 1 week to 1 month. According to the pathological grade, the patients were divided into 3 groups: group G(1): 69 cases, male 58 and female 11; group G(2): 375 cases, male 255 and female 120; group G(3): 198 cases, male 143 and female 55. And the difference of NMP22 between each group were compared. Meanwhile, according to pathological stage, 239 patients were divided into 3 groups: group PT(1): 121 cases, male 76 and female 45; group PT(2): 65 cases, male 37 and female 28; group PT(3): 53 cases, male 29 and female 24. And the difference of NMP22 between each group were compared.

RESULTS

The concentrations of NMP22 had significant difference between the 3 groups which divided according to pathological grade (Kruskal-Wallis test chi(2) = 67.547, P < 0.001); The concentrations of NMP22 had significant difference between the 3 groups which divided according to pathological stage (Kruskal-Wallis test chi(2) = 20.629, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relation between NMP22 urinary level and the grade and stage of bladder transitional cell carcinoma.

Urinary gelatinase activities (matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9) in human bladder tumors

The ability to degrade type IV collagen, the major component of the basement membrane, is unique to gelatinases A and B. These two matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are most often linked to the malignant phenotype of tumor cells, and their expression is elevated in several cases of human tumor aggressiveness and overall survival. By gelatin zymography, we verified MMP activity in the urine of patients with bladder cancer. Of these patients, 10 had well-, 8 had moderately and 7 had poorly differentiated bladder cancer. The urine of healthy volunteers with no evidence of disease was used for controls. Zymography showed five dominant gelatinolytic bands of 240, 220, 130, 92 and 72 kDa in tumor samples, whereas only traces of MMP were detected in the urine of healthy subjects. The majority of cancerous urine samples showed MMP-9 lytic activity but only a few contained MMP-2. Moreover, MMP-9 content is enhanced in the urine from patients with high-grade and advanced-stage bladder tumors. Finally, we determined the urinary levels of urinary bladder cancer (UBC), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and protein 22 of nuclear matrix (NMP22). The levels of TPS and NMP-22 were higher in G3 bladder cancer than in G1 and G2 neoplasias. The urinary values of these two biomarkers correlated with the increase in MMP-9 lytic activity in high-grade and advanced-stage bladder cancer.

Comparison of NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical performance of the NMP22 BladderChek test, which is a qualitative test, and to compare it with voided urine cytology for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer. We also evaluated whether cystoscopy can be omitted from the surveillance protocol by combining the two tests.

METHODS

A total of 131 patients with a history of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder provided urine samples before a cystoscopic examination. Urine samples were assayed for the presence of NMP22 using the NMP22 BladderChek test and cytology was performed by a cytopathologist. Selected patients underwent a biopsy, with appropriate additional therapy. Results of the two tests were compared with that the results of cystoscopy, which was retained as the gold standard. For positive biopsies, the results of the NMP22 test and cytology were also correlated with the tumor stage and grade.

RESULTS

Of the 46 recurrences detected by cystoscopy, the NMP22 test was positive in 39 cases and cytology in 19 cases. The sensitivity of the NMP22 test was 85%, which was significantly greater than that of cytology (41%). In particular, for low-risk tumors it was eight times more sensitive than cytology. The specificities of the NMP22 test and cytology were 77 and 96%, respectively. Combining the two tests increased overall sensitivity to 91%. However, 9% of the tumors were still not detected.

CONCLUSION

The NMP22 BladderChek test is an in vitro qualitative test that is easily available and cheap; it can be performed by a urologist in the office and results can be interpreted within 30 min. The NMP22 test is superior to cytology for all grades and stages in the detection of recurrence in patients with a history of superficial bladder cancer. Our study indicates that the NMP22 test can be used as a substitute for urine cytology. The NMP22 test cannot replace cystoscopy, but it can be used as an adjunct to cystoscopy in the surveillance protocol for patients with superficial bladder cancer.

[Clinical evaluation of urinary NMP22 (nuclear matrix protein 22) bladder chek in the detection of patients with bladder cancer]

The clinical usefulness of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) Bladder Chek test as a novel urine marker in the detection of patients with bladder cancer was evaluated in comparison with the urinary NMP22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and urinary cytology. A total of 40 patients with pathologically proven bladder cancer voided urine specimen before treatment. The urine samples were divided for NMP22 Bladder Chek test, NMP22 ELISA, and urinary cytology. In the 40 patients with bladder cancer, the overall positive rate was 62.5% for the NMP22 Bladder Chek test, 55% for the NMP22 ELISA test, and 27.5% for urine cytology. There was a significant difference between NMP22 Bladder Chek, NMP22 ELISA and cytology. The positive rate with the NMP22 Bladder Chek and NMP22 ELISA was higher in the patients with high grade and large-size (1 cm < or =) tumor. In 40 patients presenting with microhematuria without urothelial cancer, the false positive rate 12.5, 10, and 0% for NMP22 Bladder Chek, NMP22 ELISA, and urinary cytology. No significant difference was found with the test. In conclusion, the urine NMP22 Bladder Chek test provided a higher positive rate than the NMP22 ELISA test and urinary cytology. Therefore, the NMP22 Bladder Chek test may be clinically more useful as a tumor marker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Surveillance for recurrent bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay

CONTEXT

At least 50% of patients with a history of bladder cancer have recurrences, so rigorous surveillance is necessary. Cystoscopy is standard but can fail to detect some bladder cancers, so a urine test is frequently part of the evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a point-of-care proteomic test that measures the nuclear matrix protein NMP22 in voided urine could improve detection of recurrence during monitoring of patients with a history of bladder cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

From September 2001 to February 2002, 23 academic, private practice, and hospital facilities in 9 US states prospectively enrolled 668 consecutive patients with a history of bladder cancer in this cross-sectional study. Patients provided a voided urine sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology prior to cystoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnosis of bladder cancer recurrence, based on cystoscopy with biopsy, was accepted as the reference standard. The performance of the NMP22 test was compared with voided urine cytology as an aid to detection. Testing for the NMP22 tumor marker was conducted in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 103 patients. Cystoscopy alone identified 91.3% of the cancers (94/103; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.1%-95.9%). The combination of cystoscopy with the NMP22 assay detected 99.0% of the malignancies (102/103; 95% CI, 94.7%-100%; P = .005). The NMP22 assay detected 8 of 9 cancers that were not visualized during initial cystoscopy, including 7 that were high-grade. The sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 test alone were 49.5% (51/103; 95% CI, 39.5%-59.5%) and 87.3% (493/565; 95% CI, 84.2%-89.9%), respectively. Voided cytology detected only 3 of the malignancies missed during initial cystoscopy and did not significantly increase the sensitivity of cystoscopy (94.2%; 95% CI, 87.7%-97.8%; P = .08).

CONCLUSION

The noninvasive point-of-care assay for elevated urinary NMP22 protein can increase the ability to detect recurrent bladder cancer, with test results available during the patient visit.

Prognostic value of cytology, nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test, and urinary bladder cancer II (UBC II) test in early recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

This study addresses the diagnostic value of the Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 (NMP22) test and the Urinary Bladder Cancer (UBC II) test, in comparison to bladder wash cytology for the detection of early recurrence of bladder cancer. Patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (TCC, n = 60) and patients with benign urological diseases (n = 30) were included in this study. Voided urine samples were divided into 2 aliquots: aliquot 1 was assayed for NMP22 and aliquot 2 was tested for UBC II. Saline bladder washings were used for cytologic examination. Urine samples from TCC patients were collected before transurethral resection and on postoperative day 10. On day 10, 15 NMP22 results and 7 UBC II results exceeded the normal ranges; 4 of the cytology samples were positive for malignancy. Based on cystoscopic findings at 3 mo post-resection, 21 of the cases were classified as early recurrence; 11 of the early recurrences had been in the elevated NMP22 group, 4 in the elevated UBC II group, and 3 in the positive cytology group at 10 days post-resection. The NMP22 test gave the highest sensitivity for detecting early recurrent tumors (11 of 21, 52%). Such high sensitivity did not occur with the UBC II test (4 of 21, 19%) or cytology (3 of 21, 14%). These differences were significant (p = 0.024 and 0.009, respectively). Thus, the NMP22 test showed superiority over the other tests for detection of early recurrence of bladder cancer.