Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors reduce the progression of mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis: 10 year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is a common presentation of mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (MsPGN). No studies are available on the long-term effect of treatment by renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors on renal outcome in MsPGN patients. This study prospectively evaluates the effects of RAS inhibitors on renal outcome in patients with low risk MsPGN followed up for 10 years using historical patients with similar features at the time of presentation as untreated controls.

ENDPOINTS

decrease of basal proteinuria>20% and loss>20% of basal glomerular filtrate rate (GFR) at the end of first year of observation. The patients were re-evaluated bimonthly during the first year and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients fulfilled the selection criteria. After one year follow-up 19 patients reached the endpoint of proteinuria and no patient reached the endpoint of GFR. No significant change in blood pressure levels (BP) and GFR was registered, by contrast daily proteinuria decreased significantly (p<0.001), falling by 29% at sixth month and 47% at the end of the follow-up. The historical control group consisted of 15 untreated patients seen between 1987 and 1992. The two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures showed greater values of GFR (p<0.001) and lower levels of daily proteinuria (p<0.001) in treated patients as compared to untreated controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This 10-year follow-up study indicates that the early treatment with RAS inhibitors at low doses favourably influences the long-term renal outcome in proteinuric patients with MsPGN. Limitations were the small sample size and lack of randomization.

Telmisartan for the management of patients at high cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) places a significant burden on healthcare providers. High blood pressure (BP) is the single most prevalent risk factor for CVD worldwide and is responsible for more deaths than any other risk factor. 'Cardiovascular (CV) high-risk patients' make up the broad cross-section of patients in the middle of the risk spectrum for CVD progression that is referred to as the CV continuum and includes those with atherothrombotic disease, those with target organ damage associated with type 2 diabetes and those with multiple risk factors. Angiotensin II is involved in CVD progression at every stage of the CV continuum, making the renin-angiotensin system a rational target for pharmacologic intervention. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) offer a better tolerated alternative to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, with greater long-term adherence. The ARB telmisartan recently received an indication for CV prevention.

SCOPE

A PubMed literature search was conducted to identify evidence on the use of telmisartan for preventing CV events.

FINDINGS

Telmisartan has a favourable safety and tolerability profile, and has demonstrated efficacious and long-lasting 24-hour BP reductions, whether as monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine. In the largest CV prevention trial program undertaken with an ARB (the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial; ONTARGET), telmisartan 80 mg/day alone was as effective as ramipril in reducing the composite primary endpoint of CV mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for heart failure in CV high-risk patients. However, patients were significantly more likely to adhere to treatment with telmisartan than ramipril due to its better tolerability.

CONCLUSION

To date, telmisartan is the only ARB indicated to reduce CV morbidity in a broad CV high-risk population.

Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in high-risk Chinese patients: analysis of ONTARGET China data

BACKGROUND

The results from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) indicated that the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan was not inferior to the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril in reducing the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for congestive heart failure in high-risk patients, and telmisartan was associated with slightly superior tolerability. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. This study aimed to analyze the data from ONTARGET obtained from a subgroup of patients enrolled in China and to evaluate the demographic and baseline characteristics, the compliance, efficacy, and safety of the different treatment strategies in randomized patients in China.

METHODS

A total of 1159 high-risk patients were randomized into three treatment groups: with 390 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan, 385 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril and 384 assigned to receive both study medications. The median follow-up period was 4.3 years.

RESULTS

The mean age of Chinese patients was 65.6 years, 73.6% of patients were male. The proportion of patients with stroke/transient ischemic attacks at baseline in China was two times more than the entire study population (47.7% vs. 20.9%). In Chinese patients the proportion of permanent discontinuation of study medication due to cough was 0.5% in the telmisartan group, which was much less than that in the combination or the ramipril group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of primary outcome among three treatment groups of Chinese patients. More strokes occurred in Chinese patients than in the entire study population (8.5% vs. 4.5%). Greater systolic blood pressure reduction (-9.8 mmHg), and more renal function failure were noted in the combination treatment group than in the ramipril or telmisartan group (2.6% vs. 1.6% and 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence that the results of ONTARGET differed between Chinese patients and the entire study population with respect to the incidence of primary outcome, particularly safety. Compliance with study medications was good. The evidence from ONTARGET indicated that the treatment strategies in ONTARGET were applicable to patients in China.

Ramipril and risk of hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors provide well known cardiorenal-protective benefits added to antihypertensive effects in chronic renal disease. These agents are underused in management of patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) because of common concern of hyperkalemia. However, few studies have investigated effect of renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on serum potassium in hemodialysis patients. We assessed the safety of ramipril in patients on maintenance HD. We enrolled 28 adult end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated by maintenance HD and prescribed them ramipril in doses of 1.25 to 5 mg per day. They underwent serum potassium concentration measurements before ramipril introduction and in 1 to 3 months afterwards. No significant increase in kalemia was found. Results of our study encourage the use of ACE inhibitors in chronically hemodialyzed patients, but close potassium monitoring is mandatory.

Dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for diabetic kidney disease

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) prevents the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). It is controversial whether the simultaneous use of two RAAS inhibitors (ie, dual RAAS blockade) further improves renal outcomes. This review examines the scientific rationale and current clinical evidence addressing the use of dual RAAS blockade to prevent and treat DKD. It is concluded that dual RAAS blockade should not be routinely applied to patients with low or moderate risk of progressive kidney disease (normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria with preserved glomerular filtration rate). For patients with high risk of progressive kidney disease (substantial albuminuria or impaired glomerular filtration rate), clinicians should carefully weigh the potential risks and benefits of dual RAAS blockade on an individual basis until ongoing clinical trials provide further insight.

Strict blood-pressure control and progression of renal failure in children

BACKGROUND

Although inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system delays the progression of renal failure in adults with chronic kidney disease, the blood-pressure target for optimal renal protection is controversial. We assessed the long-term renoprotective effect of intensified blood-pressure control among children who were receiving a fixed high dose of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor.

METHODS

After a 6-month run-in period, 385 children, 3 to 18 years of age, with chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 80 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area) received ramipril at a dose of 6 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day. Patients were randomly assigned to intensified blood-pressure control (with a target 24-hour mean arterial pressure below the 50th percentile) or conventional blood-pressure control (mean arterial pressure in the 50th to 95th percentile), achieved by the addition of antihypertensive therapy that does not target the renin-angiotensin system; patients were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the time to a decline of 50% in the glomerular filtration rate or progression to end-stage renal disease. Secondary end points included changes in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and urinary protein excretion.

RESULTS

A total of 29.9% of the patients in the group that received intensified blood-pressure control reached the primary end point, as assessed by means of a Kaplan-Meier analysis, as compared with 41.7% in the group that received conventional blood-pressure control (hazard ratio, 0.65; confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.94; P=0.02). The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the type or incidence of adverse events or the cumulative rates of withdrawal from the study (28.0% vs. 26.5%). Proteinuria gradually rebounded during ongoing ACE inhibition after an initial 50% decrease, despite persistently good blood-pressure control. Achievement of blood-pressure targets and a decrease in proteinuria were significant independent predictors of delayed progression of renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensified blood-pressure control, with target 24-hour blood-pressure levels in the low range of normal, confers a substantial benefit with respect to renal function among children with chronic kidney disease. Reappearance of proteinuria after initial successful pharmacologic blood-pressure control is common among children who are receiving long-term ACE inhibition. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221845.)

[Renal effect of treatment for heart failure]

The case of a 66-year-old male with heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome is presented. The patient had normal renal function before intensive treatment with diuretics and ACE inhibitor. Shortly after the ACE inhibitor was stopped and diuretics were either stopped or reduced in dosage, his renal function normalized. Suggestions are presented for follow-up after initiation of ACE inhibitor treatment.

Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are known to reduce proteinuria. Their combination might be more effective than either treatment alone, but long-term data for comparative changes in renal function are not available. We investigated the renal effects of ramipril (an ACE inhibitor), telmisartan (an ARB), and their combination in patients aged 55 years or older with established atherosclerotic vascular disease or with diabetes with end-organ damage.

METHODS

The trial ran from 2001 to 2007. After a 3-week run-in period, 25 620 participants were randomly assigned to ramipril 10 mg a day (n=8576), telmisartan 80 mg a day (n=8542), or to a combination of both drugs (n=8502; median follow-up was 56 months), and renal function and proteinuria were measured. The primary renal outcome was a composite of dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine, and death. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153101.

FINDINGS

784 patients permanently discontinued randomised therapy during the trial because of hypotensive symptoms (406 on combination therapy, 149 on ramipril, and 229 on telmisartan). The number of events for the composite primary outcome was similar for telmisartan (n=1147 [13.4%]) and ramipril (1150 [13.5%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09), but was increased with combination therapy (1233 [14.5%]; HR 1.09, 1.01-1.18, p=0.037). The secondary renal outcome, dialysis or doubling of serum creatinine, was similar with telmisartan (189 [2.21%]) and ramipril (174 [2.03%]; HR 1.09, 0.89-1.34) and more frequent with combination therapy (212 [2.49%]: HR 1.24, 1.01-1.51, p=0.038). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined least with ramipril compared with telmisartan (-2.82 [SD 17.2] mL/min/1.73 m(2)vs -4.12 [17.4], p<0.0001) or combination therapy (-6.11 [17.9], p<0.0001). The increase in urinary albumin excretion was less with telmisartan (p=0.004) or with combination therapy (p=0.001) than with ramipril.

INTERPRETATION

In people at high vascular risk, telmisartan's effects on major renal outcomes are similar to ramipril. Although combination therapy reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than monotherapy, overall it worsens major renal outcomes.

Safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events: an observational study

To assess the safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events by observing the levels of blood pressure (BP) and by recording the incidence of cough in these patients, a study was conducted in a total of 1048 patients who participated in the registry. Eligible patients in this prospective, observational, longitudinal, multicentre registry included all normotensives--including treated hypertensives--with BP <140/90 mm Hg, a history of coronary aritery disease and a history of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or diabetes (with micro-albuminuria) or dyslipidaemia, in whom ramipril was indicated for CV risk reduction and had been prescribed by the treating physician. The primary outcome was the effect on BP at 8 weeks, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of cough at 8 weeks. Ramipril was initiated at 2.5 mg once daily (OD) for a week, followed by 5 mg OD for 3 weeks and was then increased to 10 mg OD. Data was analysed using ANOVA and Chi-square test. A total of 1,048 patients participated in this registry; 868 (82.82%) continued with the treatment till the end of the registry (ie, 8 weeks). At baseline, systolic BP was 130.10 +/- 5.38 mm Hg, while diastolic BP was 81.07 +/- 4.36 mm Hg. At 8 weeks, these values changed non-significantly to 123.41 +/- 6.33 mm Hg and 79.03 +/- 4.84 mm Hg, respectively. At week 1, 41 patients had cough, which increased non-significantly to 58 by week 8. Only 6 patients complained of severe cough at week 8, which did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Tolerability of the treatment was assessed to be 'excellent' or 'good' by 63.3% patients and 67% physicians. Treatment with ramipril 10 mg daily in patients with high risk of CV events and normal/ controlled BP produced neither a significant fall in BP nor significant adverse events in real-world clinical practice and was well tolerated.

Safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and tolerability of ramipril 10 mg in patients at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events by observing the levels of blood pressure (BP) and by recording the incidence of cough in these patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients in this prospective, observational, longitudinal, multicentre registry included all normotensives-including treated hypertensives-with BP <140/90 mm Hg, a history of coronary artery disease and a history of cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or diabetes (with microalbuminuria), or dyslipidaemia, in whom ramipril was indicated for CV risk reduction and had been prescribed by the treating physician. The primary outcome was the effect on BP at 8 weeks, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of cough at 8 weeks. Ramipril was initiated at 2.5 mg once daily (o.d.) for a week, followed by 5 mg o.d. for 3 weeks and was then increased to 10 mg o.d. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Chi square test.

RESULTS

A total of 1,048 patients participated in this registry; 868 (82.87 percent;) continued with the treatment till the end of the registry (i.e., 8 weeks). At baseline, systolic BP was 130.1 +/- 5.38 mm Hg, while diastolic BP was 81.07 +/- 4.36 mm Hg. At 8 weeks, these values changed non-significantly to 123.41 +/- 6.33 mm Hg and 79.03 +/- 4.84 mm Hg, respectively. At week 1, 7.1% of patients had cough, which increased non-significantly to 10% by week 8. Only 6 patients complained of severe cough at week 8, which did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Tolerability of the treatment was assessed to be "excellent" or "good" by 63.3% patients and 67% physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ramipril 10 mg daily in patients with high risk of CV events and normal/controlled BP produced neither a significant fall in BP nor significant adverse events in real-world clinical practice and was well tolerated.

Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events

BACKGROUND

In patients who have vascular disease or high-risk diabetes without heart failure, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular causes, but the role of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in such patients is unknown. We compared the ACE inhibitor ramipril, the ARB telmisartan, and the combination of the two drugs in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes.

METHODS

After a 3-week, single-blind run-in period, patients underwent double-blind randomization, with 8576 assigned to receive 10 mg of ramipril per day, 8542 assigned to receive 80 mg of telmisartan per day, and 8502 assigned to receive both drugs (combination therapy). The primary composite outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Mean blood pressure was lower in both the telmisartan group (a 0.9/0.6 mm Hg greater reduction) and the combination-therapy group (a 2.4/1.4 mm Hg greater reduction) than in the ramipril group. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 1412 patients in the ramipril group (16.5%), as compared with 1423 patients in the telmisartan group (16.7%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.09). As compared with the ramipril group, the telmisartan group had lower rates of cough (1.1% vs. 4.2%, P<0.001) and angioedema (0.1% vs. 0.3%, P=0.01) and a higher rate of hypotensive symptoms (2.6% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001); the rate of syncope was the same in the two groups (0.2%). In the combination-therapy group, the primary outcome occurred in 1386 patients (16.3%; relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07); as compared with the ramipril group, there was an increased risk of hypotensive symptoms (4.8% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001), syncope (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.03), and renal dysfunction (13.5% vs. 10.2%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan was equivalent to ramipril in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes and was associated with less angioedema. The combination of the two drugs was associated with more adverse events without an increase in benefit. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153101 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Evaluation of fixed dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan+ramipril usage in patients with micro-albuminuria and persistent hypertension: A TRIUMPH study

Micro-albuminuria is a marker for declining kidney function and predicts increasing cardiovascular risk especially in diabetic hypertensives. Angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may slow the progression of proteinuric kidney disease and thus would be valuable in these high risk patients. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan and ramipril in adult Indian patients with sustained stage 2 hypertension, comorbidities and micro-albuminuria. A total 382 patients were enrolled in this multicentric, prospective open, non-comparative phase IV postmarketing surveillance study by 40 physicians in India and treated with FDC of telmisartan 40 mg+ ramipril 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks. A total 370 patients completed the study but 12 patients were lost to follow-up and considered as drop-outs. There was a significant (p<0.05) reduction in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 170.89 at baseline to 132. 77 mm Hg at week 12 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 104.47 to 83.30 mm Hg at the end of 12 weeks therapy as well as urine albumin levels from 186.25 mg/24-hour to 62.42 mg/24-hour (66.49%) at the end of 12 weeks. Overall assessment of treatment was rated as good to excellent in 87.3% and fair in 11.4% patients. The most common adverse event reported was cough (5.2%). Results of the present study indicate that the FDC of telmisartan+ramipril brings about significant reductions in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as urine albumin excretion.

Effect of ramipril on renal function in patients with intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Study (HOPE) demonstrated that ramipril resulted in a blood-pressure-independent 25% reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Despite this, general practitioners and vascular surgeons remain reluctant to prescribe ACE inhibitors in this group of patients because of concerns about renal artery stenosis (RAS). We aimed to define the effect of ramipril on renal function in patients with intermittent claudication (IC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 132 unselected patients with IC entering the study 78 (59%) were excluded due to: current ACE inhibitor use (38%), renal impairment (serum creatinine above normal range) (15%), known severe RAS (1%) or unwillingness to participate (5%). The remaining 54 patients were titrated to 10 mg ramipril and renal function was monitored at 1, 5, and 12 weeks. Treatment was discontinued during titration in 5 patients due to symptoms (3) or lack of compliance (2). In the remainder, median [IQR] serum creatinine increased (94 [85.8-103.3] to 98 [88.0-106.5] micromol/L, p < or = 0.001) and median [IQR] GFR decreased (71.5 [64.6-82.3] to 68.7 [59.8-74.7] mL/min per 1.73 m2, p < or = 0.001) between baseline and 5 weeks. These changes were not considered clinically significant. By 12 weeks these values had returned almost to baseline (Cr 95.5 [88.0-103.25] micromol/L, GFR 71.8 [65.3-77.4] mL/min). No patient had a serum creatinine rise > 30%.

CONCLUSION

Most of patients with IC and a normal serum creatinine can be safely commenced on ramipril provided they are screened, titrated and monitored as described above. Studies in patients with borderline renal impairment (serum creatinine up to 30% above baseline) are on-going.

Diabetes prevention: still no effective drugs

In the DREAM trial, involving more than 5000 patients with "impaired glucose tolerance", ramipril had no preventive effect, while rosiglitazone had cardiac adverse effects.

Treatment of microalbuminuria in hypertensive subjects with elevated cardiovascular risk: Results of the IMPROVE trial

Microalbuminuria independently predicts increased cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients, especially in those with concomitant diabetes or established cardiovascular disease. Drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system reduce microalbuminuria regardless of diabetic status. The Irbesartan in the Management of PROteinuric patients at high risk for Vascular Events was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled paralleled group study in which hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to 20 weeks treatment with ramipril plus irbesartan or to ramipril plus placebo. Patients discontinued or tapered previous antihypertensive therapy during a 14-day placebo lead-in period. Change in albumin excretion rate from baseline to week 20 was the primary end point. Adjusted week 20 baseline geometric ratios for ramipril plus irbesartan and ramipril plus placebo were not significantly different. Although differences in blood pressure reductions were observed between the two treatments, these changes did not affect microalbuminuria. More patients on dual therapy achieved target blood pressure goals at week 20 than with monotherapy. The incidence of adverse effects and treatment-related adverse effects was similar in both groups. Our results suggest that patients with cardiovascular risk and relatively low albumin excretion rates in early-stage disease may only require monotherapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blocking agents.

Regression of left-ventricular hypertrophy in children and adolescents with hypertension during ramipril monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity. Antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) is able to induce the regression of LVH in adults. However, there has been no study of the ability of ACEI to induce the regression of LVH in children. Our aim was to investigate the effect of ramipril on left-ventricular mass and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive children.

METHODS

Twenty-one children (median age, 15 years) with renal (76%) or primary (24%) hypertension were prospectively treated with ramipril monotherapy for 6 months. Blood pressure was evaluated using ambulatory BP monitoring, with hypertension defined as mean BP >or=95th percentile. Left-ventricular hypertrophy was defined either as left-ventricular mass index (LVMI) >38.6 g/m(2.7) (pediatric definition) or as LVMI >51.0 g/m(2.7) (adult definition).

RESULTS

Nineteen children completed the study. The median LVMI decreased from 36.8 g/m(2.7) (range, 18.9 to 55.8 g/m(2.7)) to 32.6 g/m(2.7) (range, 19.0 to 52.1 g/m(2.7); P < .05) after 6 months. The prevalence of LVH decreased from 42% to 11% using the pediatric definition (P < .05) and did not change using the adult definition (ie, it remained at 5%). The median ambulatory BP decreased by 11, 7, 8, and 7 mm Hg for daytime systolic, daytime diastolic, nighttime systolic, and nighttime diastolic BP (P < .05), respectively. A positive correlation was found between LVMI and nighttime systolic BP at the start of the study (r = 0.46, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ramipril is an effective drug in children with hypertension, for its ability to reduce not only BP but also left-ventricular mass and induce regression of LVH.