Is it justified to remove the intermediate risk group in the latest European guidelines for NSTEACS?

Background

Risk stratification in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), becomes a priority after its diagnosis, due to the fact that it gives us information about prognosis and has crucial implications. The latest guidelines of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) suggest a new proposal of risk stratification dividing patients in three different groups: “low”, “high” and “very high risk”. Thus, they remove the intermediate risk group that defended the previous guidelines (2015).

Purpose

Our aim was to identify an intermediate risk group following the recommendations of the previous guidelines about risk stratification. We believe that the risk stratification in four groups if more accurate that the latest proposed in 2020 in three groups, because the “intermediate risk group” has a different prognosis that the subgroup nowadays considered “low risk”.

Methods

We included a cohort of 7 597 patients with NSTEACS admitted in two different Cardiology departments between 2003 and 2017 with 4,4±2,7 mean years of follow-up. Subsequently, a classification of the patients in four different risk groups was made following the 2015 guidelines and events during follow-up was assigned in the next categories:first adverse major cardiovascular event (MACE),all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

Results

Stratified analysis brought up that patients included in the intermediate risk group, had a different prognosis to the categories of “low” and “high risk” patients and we obtained the following results:

Mean incidence rate for total mortality measured in cases per 100 person-year [confidence interval (CI 95%)] was 1.96; for “low risk” patients CI95% 1.30–2.95, “intermediate risk” 3.91; (CI95% 3.28–4.57), “high risk” 4.94; CI95% 4.87–5.21 and “very high risk” 8.74; CI95% 7.75- 9.85.

Incidence rate for cardiovascular mortality for “low”, “intermediate”, “high” and “very high” was 1.02; (CI95% 0.58–1.18); 2.64 (CI95% 2.13–3.26); 3.32 (CI95% 3.11–3.55) and 6.71 (CI95% 4.84–7.69), respectively.

Using Cox analysis, the “intermediate risk group” (refference), still achieved statistical significance. Results expressed in hazard ratio demonstrated that:

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the four categories proposal could have better ability for risk stratification in NSTEACS patients and make us doubt about the new three groups classification displayed in the current ESC guidelines, particularly the “intermediate risk” group exclusion that would be reassessed as “low risk”.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): No funding sources.

Clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions with polymer-free vs. durable-polymer stents: a metanalysis of randomized clinical trials

Background

Polymer-free (PF) stents were designed as an alternative to durable-polymer (DP) drug-eluting stents to minimize the time on dual antiplatelet treatment for patients at high-risk of bleeding. Nonetheless, the efficacy and safety of PF vs. DP stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain controversial.

Methods

We performed a metanalysis with currently available studies that assessed the effect of PF-stents vs. DP-stents after performing a systematic search. The endpoints analyzed were all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and probable or definite stent thrombosis. The raw numbers of incident end-points reported in each study were used. We performed analyses in short and long term (<1 or >1 year follow-up) studies.

Results

We included 12464 patients from 8 studies (5 short-term and 3 long-term): 6723 treated with PF-stents and 5741 with DP stents. Females represented 23.3% (n=3284) and 33.7% (n=4202) were included in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. As shown in the figure, PF-stents were associated to lower incidence of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.91 95% CI 0.84–0.98; p=0.016) and TLR (HR: 0.88 95% CI 0.80–0.96; p=0.003). No differences were observed in the risk of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.96 95% CI 0.86–1.06 p=0.415), myocardial infarction (HR: 0.90 95% CI 0.80–1.01; p=0.061) or probable-definite stent thrombosis (HR: 0.92 95% CI 0.74–1.14; p=0.447). Finally, no differences in the primary end-point (HR: 0.92 95% CI 0.83–1.03; p=0.143) were detected with PF-stents vs. DP-stents. No significant heterogenicity was observed in any of the endpoints, except for the incidence of stent thrombosis.

Conclusions

Under current PCI techniques the use of PF-stent might be associated to better outcomes, especially in terms of all-cause mortality and TLR.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Prognosis Impact of Diabetes in Elderly Women and Men with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Few studies have addressed to date the interaction between sex and diabetes mellitus (DM) in the prognosis of elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Our aim was to address the role of DM in the prognosis of non-selected elderly patients with NSTEACS according to sex. A retrospective analysis from 11 Spanish NSTEACS registries was conducted, including patients aged ≥70 years. The primary end point was one-year all-cause mortality. A total of 7211 patients were included, 2,770 (38.4%) were women, and 39.9% had DM. Compared with the men, the women were older (79.95 ± 5.75 vs. 78.45 ± 5.43 years, p < 0.001) and more often had a history of hypertension (77% vs. 83.1%, p < 0.01). Anemia and chronic kidney disease were both more common in women. On the other hand, they less frequently had a prior history of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease or comorbidities such as peripheral artery disease and chronic pulmonary disease. Women showed a worse clinical profile on admission, though an invasive approach and in-hospital revascularization were both more often performed in men (p < 0.001). At a one-year follow-up, 1090 patients (15%) had died, without a difference between sexes. Male sex was an independent predictor of mortality (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.32, p = 0.035), and there was a significant interaction between sex and DM (p = 0.002). DM was strongly associated with mortality in women (HR: 1.45, 95% CI = 1.18–1.78; p < 0.001), but not in men (HR: 0.98, 95% CI = 0.84–1.14; p = 0.787). In conclusion, DM is associated with mortality in older women with NSTEACS, but not in men.

Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Patient

Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, and its prevalence increases with age. The growing number of older patients and their differential characteristics make its management a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to summarize the state-of-the-art in diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes in this subgroup of patients. This comprises peculiarities of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management, updated evidence of non-STEMI therapeutic strategies, individualization of antiplatelet treatment (weighting ischemic and hemorrhagic risks), as well as assessment of geriatric conditions and ethical issues in decision making.

Predictive Value of Pro-BNP for Heart Failure Readmission after an Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

N-terminal pro-brain natural peptide (NT-pro-BNP) is a well-established biomarker of tissue congestion and has prognostic value in patients with heart failure (HF). Nonetheless, there is scarce evidence on its predictive capacity for HF re-admission after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We performed a prospective, single-center study in all patients discharged after an ACS. HF re-admission was analyzed by competing risk regression, taking all-cause mortality as a competing event. Results are presented as sub-hazard ratios (sHR). Recurrent hospitalizations were tested by negative binomial regression, and results are presented as incidence risk ratio (IRR).

RESULTS

Of the 2133 included patients, 528 (24.8%) had HF during the ACS hospitalization, and their pro-BNP levels were higher (3220 pg/mL vs. 684.2 pg/mL; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 2.9%, and pro-BNP was similarly higher in these patients. Increased pro-BNP levels were correlated to increased risk of HF or death during the hospitalization. Over follow-up (median 38 months) 243 (11.7%) patients had at least one hospital readmission for HF and 151 (7.1%) had more than one. Complete revascularization had a preventive effect on HF readmission, whereas several other variables were associated with higher risk. Pro-BNP was independently associated with HF admission (sHR: 1.47) and readmission (IRR: 1.45) at any age. Significant interactions were found for the predictive value of pro-BNP in women, diabetes, renal dysfunction, STEMI and patients without troponin elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital determination of pro-BNP is an independent predictor of HF readmission after an ACS.

Multicenter and all-comers validation of a score to select patients for manual thrombectomy, the DDTA score

BACKGROUND

Routine manual thrombectomy (MT) is not recommended in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) but it is performed in many procedures. The objective of our study was validating the DDTA score, designed for selecting patients who benefit most from MT.

METHODS

Observational and multicenter study of all consecutive patients undergoing P-PCI in five institutions. Results were compared with the design cohort and the performance of the DDTA was analyzed in all patients. Primary end-point of the analyses was TIMI 3 after MT; secondary endpoints were final TIMI 3, no-reflow incidence, in-hospital mortality and in-hospital major cardiovascular events (MACE). In-hospital prognosis was assessed by the Zwolle risk score.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty patients were included in the validation cohort and no differences were observed as compared to the design cohort (618 patients) except for lower use of MT and higher IIb/IIIa inhibitors or drug-eluting stents. The probability of TIMI 3 after MT decreased as delay to P-PCI was higher. If DDTA score, MT was associated to TIMI 3 after MT (OR: 4.11) and final TIMI 3 (OR: 2.44). There was a linear and continuous relationship between DDTA score and all endpoints. DDTA score ≥ 4 was independently associated to lower no-reflow, in-hospital MACE or mortality. The lowest incidence of in-hospital mortality or MACE was in patients who had DDTA score ≥ 4 and Zwolle risk score 0-3.

CONCLUSIONS

MT is associated to higher rate of final TIMI3 in patients with the DDTA score ≥ 4. Patients with DDTA score ≥ 4 had lower no-reflow and in-hospital complications.

Prognostic benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS): evaluation of the new risk stratification in the NSTEACS European guidelines

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our work is to evaluate the prognostic benefit of an early invasive strategy in patients with high-risk NSTACS according to the recommendations of the 2020 clinical practice guidelines during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 6454 consecutive NSTEACS patients. We analyze the effects of early coronary angiography (< 24 h) in patients with: (a) GRACE risk score > 140 and (b) patients with "established NSTEMI" (non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction defined by an increase in troponins) or dynamic ST-T-segment changes with a GRACE risk score < 140.

RESULTS

From 2003 to 2017, 6454 patients with "new high-risk NSTEACS" were admitted, and 6031 (93.45%) of these underwent coronary angiography. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the long-term cumulative probability of being free of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE differed significantly due to an early coronary intervention in patients with NSTEACS and GRACE > 140 [HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.57-0.67), HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.56-0.68), HR 0.57 (IC 95% 0.53-0.61), respectively]. In patients with NSTEACS and GRACE < 140 with established NSTEMI or ST/T-segment changes, the benefit of the early invasive strategy is only observed in the reduction of MACE [HR 0.62 (IC 95% 0.56-0.68)], but not for total mortality [HR 0.96 (IC 95% 0.78-1.2)] and cardiovascular mortality [HR 0.96 (IC 95% 0.75-1.24)].

CONCLUSIONS

An early invasive management is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and MACE in NSTEACS with high GRACE risk score. However, this benefit is less evident in the subgroup of patients with a GRACE score < 140 with established NSTEMI or ST/T-segment changes.

28 Evaluation invitro of two protocols of vitrification from alpaca (Vicugna pacos) embryos

The reproductive efficiency of South American camelids as the alpaca is low, with a few number of animals having a good genetic characteristic. The transfer of cryopreserved embryos has great potential to disseminate valuable genetic, but the suitable protocol for such cryopreservation still needs to be developed. In this study, two protocols of vitrification of alpaca embryos were tested. Day 6.5 post-mating, embryos (n=66) were recovered from 14 female alpacas through a non-surgical technique and classified according to the characteristics of old world camelids reported by Skidmore et al. 2004 (Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 16, 605–609). Only quality 1 and 2 embryos were used for the study. They were placed together in 50-µL drops of holding medium for 30min and transferred to a 100-µL drop of equilibration solution 1, consisting of 7.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol (EG) + 0.25M sucrose. After 1min, embryos were transferred to equilibration solution 2, consisting of 15% (v/v) EG + 0.5M sucrose. After 2min, embryos were transferred into 2 consecutive drops of vitrification solutions A [SA: 30% (v/v) EG + 1M sucrose] for 20s each, then in 2 other drops of vitrification solution B [SB: 30% (v/v) EG + 3% glycerol + 1M sucrose] for 20s each. Thereafter, embryos were quickly loaded into open pulled straws (OPS) in a volume of 10µL and then plunged into liquid nitrogen. For warming, the OPS were held in air for 5s and subsequently thawed at 37°C for 50s. Straws were emptied into 1mL of prewarmed holding medium solution (HMS1) containing 1M sucrose for wash and the thawed blastocysts were transferred into a second 1mL of prewarmed HMS1. After 5min incubation at 37°C, the blastocysts were transferred into 1mL of warmed Holding medium solution 2 (HMS2) containing 0.5M sucrose maintained at room temperature (∼24°C) for evaluation. Data were analysed by the Chi-squared test. Post-thaw embryo expansion results were 81.3% and 58.8% for SA and SB (P&lt;0.05), respectively. Post-thaw embryo quality (1 and 2) were found at 62.5% and 29.1% with SA and SB, respectively (P&lt;0.05). In conclusion, the vitrification of alpaca embryos with the ethylene glycol:sucrose solution results in better post-thaw outcomes than the ethylene glycol:sucrose:glycerol. Further experiments with embryo transfer are needed. This research was funded by FONDECYT project no. 149-2017.

Long term prognostic benefit of complete revascularization in elderly presenting with NSTEMI: real world evidence

The benefit of complete revascularization in elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and multivessel disease remains debated (MVD). The aim of our study was to determine the current long-term prognostic benefit of complete revascularization in this population. A retrospective cohort study of 1722 consecutive elderly NSTEMI patients was performed. Among the study participants 30.4% (n = 524) were completed revascularizated and in 69.6% (n = 1198) culprit vessel only revascularization was performed. A propensity score analysis was performed and we divided the study population into two groups: complete revascularization (n = 500) and culprit vessel only revascularization (n = 500). The median follow-up was 45.7 months, the all cause mortality (44.5% vs 30.5%, p < 0.001) (HR 0.74 (0.57-0.97); p = 0.035) and cardiovascular mortality (32.6% vs 17.4%, p < 0.001) (HR = 0.67 (0.47-0.94); p = 0.021) were significantly lower in patients with complete revascularization. In our study, we observed a long-term benefit of complete revascularization in elderly NSTEMI and MVD patients. Elderly patients should also be managed according to current guidelines to improve their long-term prognosis.

Effect of insulin on readmission for heart failure following a hospitalization for acute heart failure

Aims

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is related with worse outcomes. Insulin treatment is associated with sodium and water retention, weight gain, and hypoglycaemia—all pathophysiological mechanisms related to HF decompensation. This study aimed to evaluate the association between insulin treatment and the risk of 1 year readmission for HF in patients discharged for acute HF.

Methods and results

We prospectively included 2895 consecutive patients discharged after an episode of acute HF in a single tertiary hospital. Multivariable Cox regression, adapted for competing events, was used to assess the association between insulin treatment and 1 year readmission for HF in patients discharged after acute HF. Participants' mean age was 73.4 ± 11.2 years, 50.8% were women, 44.7% had T2DM [including 527 (18.2%) on insulin therapy], and 52.7% had preserved ejection fraction. At 1 year follow‐up, 518 (17.9%) patients had died and 693 (23.9%) were readmitted for HF. The crude risk of readmission for HF was higher in patients on insulin, with no differences in 1 year mortality. After multivariable adjustment, patients on insulin were at significantly higher risk of 1 year readmission for HF than patients with diabetes who were not on insulin (hazard ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.59, P = 0.022) and patients without diabetes (hazard ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.55, P = 0.035).

Conclusion

Following acute HF, patients with T2DM on insulin therapy are at increased risk of readmission for HF. Further studies unravelling the mechanisms behind this association are warranted.

Sex-related differences in mortality and heart failure after nstacs. the cardio chus-hsuj registry

Introduction and objectives

A sex-specific analysis of cardiovascular outcomes afternon-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTACS) using a large contemporary cohort of patients from two Spanish tertiary hospitals.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 5686 consecutive NSTACS patients between the years 2003 and 2017. We performed a propensity score matching to obtain a well-balanced subset of patients, resulting in 3120 patients. Cox regression models performed survival analyses once proportional risk test were verified.

Results

Among the study participants, 1572 patients (27.6%) were women. The median follow-up was 60.0 months (standard deviation 32 months). Women had higher risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with men (OR (Odds ratio) 1.27, CI (confidence interval) 95% 1.08–1.49) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization (OR 1.39, CI 95% 1.18–1.63), but a similar risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.10, CI 95% 1.08–1.49). After a propensity score matching, women were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of total mortality (OR 0.77, CI 95% 0.65–0.90) with a similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.86, CI 0.71–1.03) and HF hospitalization (OR 0.92, CI 95% 0.68–1.23). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were less in women; although the risk of HF was similar among sexes.

Conclusions

Women are at similar risk to develop early and late HF admissions after NSTACS, and have better survival compared with male, with lower risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

Cumulative risk according to gender

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Validation of the Zwolle score for selection of very low-risk STEMI patients treated with primary angioplasty

Background

The Zwolle risk score was designed to stratify the actual in-hospital mortality risk of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) but, also, for decision-making related to patients location in an intensive care unit or not. Since the GRACE score continues being the gold-standard for individual risk assessment in STEMI in most institutions we assessed the specificity of both scores for in-hospital mortality.

Methods

We assessed the accuracy of Zwolle risk score for in-hospital mortality estimation as compared to the GRACE score in all patients admitted for STEMI in 3 tertitary hospitals. Patients with Zwolle risk score &lt;3 would qualify as “low risk”, 3–5 as “intermediate risk” and ≥6 as “high risk”. Patients with GRACE score &lt;140 were classified as low-risk. Specificity, sensitivity and classification were assessed by ROC curves and the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

We included 4,446 patients, mean age 64.7 (13.6) years, 24% women and 39% with diabetes. Mean GRACE score was 157.3 (4.9) and Zwolle was 2.8 (3.3). In-hospital mortality was 10.6% (471 patients). Patients who died had higher GRACE score (218.4±4.9 vs. 149.6±37.5; p&lt;0.001) and Zwolle score (7.6±4.3 vs. 2.3±2.18; p&lt;0.001); a statistically significant increase of in-hospital mortality risk, adjusted adjusted by age, gender and revascularization, was observed with both scores (figure). A total of 1,629 patients (40.0%) were classified as low risk by the GRACE score and 2,962 (66.6%) by the Zwolle score; in-hospital mortality was 1.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Moreover, the was a significant increase of in-hospital mortality rate according to Zwolle categories (2.7%; 13.0%; 41.6%)The AUC of both score was the same (p=0.49) but the specificity of GRACE score &lt;140 was 43.1% as compared to 72.6% obtained by Zwolle score &lt;3; patients accurately classified was also lower with the GRACE score threshold (48.8% vs. 73.7%).

Conclusions

Selection of low-risk STEMI patients treated with p-PCI based on the Zwolle risk score has higher specificity than the GRACE score and might be useful for the care organization in clinical practice.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Sex-related differences in long-term mortality and heart failure in a contemporary cohort of patients with NSTEACS. The cardiochus-HSUJ registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is insufficient data regarding sex-related prognostic differences in patients with a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). We performed a sex-specific analysis of cardiovascular outcomes after NSTEACS using a large contemporary cohort of patients from two tertiary hospitals.

METHODS

This work is a retrospective analysis from a prospective registry, that included 5,686 consecutive NSTEACS patients from two Spanish University hospitals between the years 2005 and 2017. We performed a propensity score matching to obtain a well-balanced subset of individuals with the same clinical characteristics, resulting in 3,120 patients. Cox regression models performed survival analyses once the proportional risk test was verified.

RESULTS

Among the study participants, 1,572 patients (27.6%) were women. The mean follow-up was 60.0 months (standard deviation of 32 months). Women had a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with men (OR (Odds ratio) 1.27, CI (confidence interval) 95% 1.08-1.49), heart failure (HF) hospitalization (OR 1.39, CI 95% 1.18-1.63) and risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.10, CI 95% 1.08-1.49). After a propensity score matching, female gender was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of total mortality (OR 0.77, CI 95% 0.65-0.90) with a similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.86, CI 0.71-1.03) and HF hospitalization (OR 0.92, CI 95% 0.68-1.23). After baseline adjustment, the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was lower in women, whereas the risk of HF remained similar among sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary cohort of patients with NSTEACS, women are at similar risk of developing early and late HF admissions, and have better survival compared with men, with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. The implementation of NSTEACS guideline recommendations in women, including early revascularization, seems to be accompanied by improved early and long-term prognosis.

Stroke and myocardial infarction prevention with GLP1 analogues in high or very-high cardiovascular risk diabetic patients

Background

Patients with established cardiovascular disease have an increased risk of stroke, even in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Several trials have analysed the effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1) analogues on cardiovascular events in patients with high cardiovascular disease.

Methods

We performed a metanalysis with all randomized clinical trial that compared a GLP1 analogue vs. placebo. Primary endpoint was stroke incidence, including ischemic and haemorrhagic aetiology, assessed by fixed-effect model.

Results

We identified 7 trials that compared a GLP analogue (albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixinatide or semaglutide). A total of 56,004 patients were included in the analysis, 27977 treated with a GLP1 analogue. Mean age of the patients was 63.9 (2.1) years, 25,398 (45.4%) patients had cardiovascular disease.

A total of 1,568 strokes were reported, 711 in patients receiving a GLP analogue and 857 in control arm; treatment with a GLP1 analogue reduced the incidence of stroke by 147% (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.92; p&lt;0.001). No heterogeneity between trials was observed (p=0.835). Globally, treatment with GPL1 analogues reduced the incidence of stroke or myocardial infarction by 11% (RR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.84–0.94; p&lt;0.01)

A total of 3,192 cases of myocardial infarction were reported: 1,524 in patients treated with GLP1 analogues and 1,668 with placebo. Treatment with GLP1 analogues reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction by 8% (RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–0.98; p=0.010)

Conclusions

Treatment with a GLP1 analogue reduced the incidence of stroke by 17% and myocardial infarction by 8%, in different trials involving high or very-high risk patients with diabetes.

Forest plot: stroke and MI

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Acute coronary syndrome patients with two minor high-bleeding risk criteria have the same bleeding rate that patients with one major criteria

Background

In 2019 the Academic Research Consortium of high-bleeding risk (ARC-HBR) proposed a new and binary definition of high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients based on the presence of 1 major or 2 minor criteria.

Methods

Prospective study of all consecutive patients admitted for ACS in two different centers. We analyzed bleeding incidence in patients with 1 major criteria (1MC) vs. 2 minor criteria (2mC) using the 2019 ARC-HBR consensus. Bleeding events were collected according those fitting definitions 3 or 5 of the BARC consortium.

Results

We included 8,724 patients included and 40.9% we classified as HBR; 20.9% for 1MC and 20.0% for 2mC. In-hospital mayor bleeding rate was 8.6%; no-HBR patients had 0.3%, 2mC 15.1% and 1MC 29.7% (p&lt;0.001 for the comparison). In contrast, the statistically highest in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with 2mC (11.4%), followed by patients with 1MC (8.0%) and no-HBR patients (2.0%).

During follow-up (median time 57.8 months) all-cause mortality rate was 21.0% and cardiovascular dead 14.2%. The incidence of post-discharge major bleeding was 10.5%. No-HBR patients had the lowest bleeding rate (7.4%) and no difference was observed in patients with 1MC (14.6%) or 2mC (15.8%) (figure). The multivariate analysis, adjusted by age, gender, medical treatment, atrial fibrillation and revascularization and considering all-cause mortality as competing risk, showed independent association of 1MC (sHR: 1.46, 95% 1.22–1.75) and 2mC (sHR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.05–1.63) with post-discharge major bleeding.

Conclusions

HBR patients according to the 2019 ARC-HBR containing 2mC or 1MC are at similar and higher risk of in-hospital or post-discharge bleeding events

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Soluble ST2 and Diuretic Efficiency in Acute Heart Failure and Concomitant Renal Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients at risk of poor diuretic response in acute heart failure (AHF) is critical to make prompt adjustments in therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the circulating levels of soluble ST2 predict the cumulative diuretic efficiency (DE) at 24 and 72 hours in patients with AHF and concomitant renal dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a post hoc analysis of the IMPROVE-HF trial, in which we enrolled 160 patients with AHF and renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtrate rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m²). DE was calculated as the net fluid output produced per 40 mg of furosemide equivalents. The association between sST2 and DE was evaluated by using multivariate linear regression analysis. The median cumulative DE at 24 and 72 hour was 747 mL (interquartile range 490-1167 mL) and 1844 mL (interquartile range 1142-2625 mL), respectively. The median sST2 and mean estimated glomerular filtrate rate were 72 ng/mL (interquartile range 47-117 ng/mL), and 34.0 ± 8.5 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. In a multivariable setting, higher sST2 were significant and nonlinearly related to lower DE both at 24 and 72 hours (P = .002 and P = .019, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF and renal dysfunction at presentation, circulating levels of sST2 were independently and negatively associated with a poor diuretic response, both at 24 and 72 hours.

Comorbidity burden and revascularization benefit in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interaction between comorbidity burden and the benefits of in-hospital revascularization in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 7211 patients aged ≥ 70 years from 11 Spanish NSTEACS registries. Six comorbidities were evaluated: diabetes, peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, renal failure, and anemia. A propensity score was estimated to enable an adjusted comparison of in-hospital revascularization and conservative management. The end point was 1-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 1090 patients (15%) died. The in-hospital revascularization rate was 60%. Revascularization was associated with lower 1-year mortality; the strength of the association was unchanged by the addition of comorbidities to the model (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.53-0.69; P=.0001). However, the effects of revascularization were attenuated in patients with renal failure, peripheral artery disease, and chronic pulmonary disease (P for interaction=.004, .007, and .03, respectively) but were not modified by diabetes, anemia, and previous stroke (P=.74, .51, and .28, respectively). Revascularization benefits gradually decreased as the number of comorbidities increased (from a HR of 0.48 [95%CI, 0.39-0.61] with 0 comorbidities to 0.83 [95%CI, 0.62-1.12] with ≥ 5 comorbidities; omnibus P=.016). The results were similar for the propensity score model. The same findings were obtained when invasive management was considered the exposure variable.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital revascularization improves 1-year mortality regardless of comorbidities in elderly patients with NSTEACS. However, the revascularization benefit is progressively reduced with an increased comorbidity burden. Renal failure, peripheral artery disease, and chronic lung disease were the comorbidities with the most detrimental effects on revascularization benefits.

The Effect of Age on Mortality in Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis With 611,583 Subjects

OBJECTIVES

Initial data on COVID-19 infection has pointed out a special vulnerability of older adults.

DESIGN

We performed a meta-analysis with available national reports on May 7, 2020 from China, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and New York State. Analyses were performed by a random effects model, and sensitivity analyses were performed for the identification of potential sources of heterogeneity.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

COVID-19-positive patients reported in literature and national reports.

MEASURES

All-cause mortality by age.

RESULTS

A total of 611,1583 subjects were analyzed and 141,745 (23.2%) were aged ≥80 years. The percentage of octogenarians was different in the 5 registries, the lowest being in China (3.2%) and the highest in the United Kingdom and New York State. The overall mortality rate was 12.10% and it varied widely between countries, the lowest being in China (3.1%) and the highest in the United Kingdom (20.8%) and New York State (20.99%). Mortality was <1.1% in patients aged <50 years and it increased exponentially after that age in the 5 national registries. As expected, the highest mortality rate was observed in patients aged ≥80 years. All age groups had significantly higher mortality compared with the immediately younger age group. The largest increase in mortality risk was observed in patients aged 60 to 69 years compared with those aged 50 to 59 years (odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 2.61-3.76).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This meta-analysis with more than half million of COVID-19 patients from different countries highlights the determinant effect of age on mortality with the relevant thresholds on age >50 years and, especially, >60 years. Older adult patients should be prioritized in the implementation of preventive measures.

Understanding Erectile Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients: The Need for Good Patient Management

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as a man’s consistent or recurrent inability to attain and/or maintain penile erection enough for successful vaginal intercourse. ED affects a large part of the population, increasing its incidence with age and comorbidities. It is estimated by the year 2025, 322 million men will suffer from ED. Incidence of ED has been related not only to chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, hyperlipidemia, psychiatric diseases or urinary tract diseases, but also to hypertension and especially to antihypertensive treatments. This review summarizes current knowledge about the management of ED in hypertensive men and its role as cardiovascular disease predictor.

A simple score to select patients for manual thrombectomy in emergent percutaneous coronary interventions: the DDTA score

BACKGROUND

The objective of manual thrombectomy is the removal of occlusive thrombus to improve the results of primary angioplasty. The better understanding of the factors associated with successful manual thrombectomy may provide relevant information regarding thrombus formation and resolution.

METHODS

Observational study of all consecutive patients remitted for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a single centre. Successful manual thrombectomy was considered when TIMI 3 was achieved after using the device and a score to predict successful manual thrombectomy was designed.

RESULTS

We included 618 patients, 65.1% treated with manual thrombectomy. No relevant differences in clinical features or time delays were observed between patients treated with vs. without manual thrombectomy, but manual thrombectomy treated patients received more often dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) before PCI. Final TIMI flow 3 was achieved in most patients and more frequently in manual thrombectomy treated patients (94.8 vs. 86.6%; P < 0.01). The successful manual thrombectomy rate was 81.3% and it was higher in patients pretreated with DAPT (89.0 vs. 73.3%; P < 0.01). The time delay to first medical contact was not related to the final TIMI 3, but it was significantly and negatively related to successful manual thrombectomy. According to the multivariate analysis, we designed the DDTA score: DAPT pretreatment (2), delay less than 2 h (3) or 2-4 h (2), TIMI flow improvement after wiring the lesion (2) and age less than 55 years (3). Patients with DDTA score at least 4 had lower no-reflow, mortality and major cardiovascular complications incidence.

CONCLUSION

The DDTA score (DAPT pretreatment, time delays, TIMI flow improvement after wiring the lesion and age) identifies patients who benefit mostly from manual thrombectomy.