Selective and long-lasting neural blockade with resiniferatoxin prevents inflammatory pain hypersensitivity

Capsaicin can produce a selective and long-lasting neural blockade. Resiniferatoxin (RTX) is an ultrapotent vanilloid agonist with a unique spectrum of activities different from that of capsaicin. We sought to determine whether a single application of RTX to a peripheral nerve could completely prevent the long-lasting mechanical hyperalgesia caused by carrageenan injection. In rat experiments, RTX (0.001%) was administered percutaneously to the sciatic and saphenous nerves before the intraplantar injection of carrageenan. Responses to noxious mechanical (pressure on the paw) and thermal (hot plate) stimulations and changes in paw circumference were measured at various time intervals for 8 days after treatment. The administration of RTX resulted in mechanical and thermal hypoalgesia (for 2 and 8 days, respectively). Inflammatory hyperalgesia was completely prevented by the precarrageenan injection of RTX. Inflammatory enhancement of paw circumference was reduced by RTX (12.0 +/- 2.4 mm versus 6.9 +/- 3.4 mm, P < 0.005). We suggest that the selective nature of the effect of vanilloid agonists on nociception could provide an opportunity for prolonged neural blockade when early mobilization and/or preservation of protective sensation are required.

IMPLICATIONS

We report that an ultrapotent vanilloid agonist resiniferatoxin can provide a selective and long-lasting neural blockade. Applied to the sciatic and saphenous nerves, it completely prevented pain hypersensitivity caused by prolonged inflammatory process (injection of carrageenan into the paw).

Can inflammatory pain prevent the development of acute tolerance to alfentanil?

Constant pain could, in principle, counteract mobilization of antianalgesia systems and prevent the development of acute tolerance to the analgesic effects of opioids. We sought to determine whether a tonic nociceptive input caused by inflammation inhibits the development of acute tolerance to alfentanil. The inflammation was induced by injection of carrageenan into the rat hind paw. A threshold of motor response to increasing pressure on the paw was used to determine analgesia. Alfentanil was administered IV with an infusion algorithm designed to maintain a constant plasma level of opioid for 4 h. The degree of acute tolerance was determined on the basis of decline in the level of analgesia. The continuous decline of the analgesic effect from its peak at 30 min to the end of the 4-h infusion period was profound, despite the constant-rate infusion of alfentanil. The degrees of decline were very similar in rats with and without carrageenan-induced inflammation (from 242 +/- 31 to 154 +/- 20 g, P < 0.0001; and from 242 +/- 33 to 148 +/- 14 g, P < 0.0001, respectively). The results suggest that inflammatory nociceptive input does not prevent the development of acute tolerance to opioid-induced analgesia measured as an increased reaction threshold to painful pressure. We conclude that acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of opioids is profound and develops very rapidly, even in the presence of constant nociceptive input.

IMPLICATIONS

We examined whether inflammatory pain can prevent the rapid decline in analgesic effectiveness (acute tolerance) of alfentanil during its IV infusion. We found that acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of alfentanil, in the presence of constant pain caused by inflammation, develops as rapidly as without it.

The effect of ketamine on opioid-induced acute tolerance: can it explain reduction of opioid consumption with ketamine-opioid analgesic combinations?

Ketamine administered intraoperatively in very small doses reduces postoperative opioid consumption. We suggest that this effect is the result of attenuation of acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of opioids. We sought to demonstrate that acute tolerance induced by alfentanil infusion can be attenuated by a dose of ketamine that is too small to produce a direct antinociceptive effect. The experiments were conducted in rats with the use of an infusion algorithm designed to maintain a constant plasma level of the opioid for 4 h. The degree of acute tolerance was determined on the basis of decline in the level of analgesia measured with a tail compression test. Ketamine (10 mg/kg) did not change the baseline pain threshold and did not increase the peak of alfentanil-induced analgesia. At the same time, it attenuated the development of acute tolerance to analgesia during alfentanil infusion and suppressed rebound hyperalgesia observed the day after the infusion. These effects were similar to those observed with dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg). The development of acute tolerance to analgesia induced by the infusion of an opioid can be attenuated by ketamine administered in doses that are not large enough to provide a direct antinociceptive effect. Therefore, ketamine has the potential to reduce opioid consumption even in subanalgesic doses.

IMPLICATIONS

Ketamine attenuated the development of acute tolerance to analgesia during alfentanil infusion and suppressed rebound hyperalgesia observed the day after the infusion.

Acute tolerance to continuously infused alfentanil: the role of cholecystokinin and N-methyl-D-aspartate-nitric oxide systems

To test the role of cholecystokinin (CCK) and N-methyl-D-aspartate-nitric oxide (NMDA-NO) systems in the development of acute tolerance to analgesia during alfentanil IV infusion, we conducted experiments in rats with the use of an infusion algorithm designed to maintain a constant plasma level of the opioid for 4 h. The degree of acute tolerance was determined on the basis of decline in the level of analgesia measured with a tail compression test. CCK(B) receptor antagonists (proglumide, CI-988, and L-365,260) and NMDA-NO cascade inhibitors (dizocilpine and NO synthase inhibitor) were administered before the start of alfentanil infusion. Use of 30 mg/kg proglumide, 10 mg/kg CI-988, and 1 mg/kg L-365,260 attenuated acute tolerance at 1 h of alfentanil infusion by approximately 60%, 55%, and 70%, respectively, and by the end of 4-h infusion by 50%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. Use of 0.1 mg/kg dizocilpine and 10 mg/kg N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester attenuated acute tolerance at 1 h of alfentanil infusion by approximately 65% and 65% and by the end of 4-h infusion by 30% and 0%, respectively. Comparison of the results with CCK(B) receptor antagonists and inhibitors of NMDA-NO cascade demonstrates that both groups of drugs provide more or less similar degrees of attenuation of acute tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of alfentanil, and none of these drugs completely prevents tolerance development.

IMPLICATIONS

The mechanism of acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of alfentanil depends on participation of multiple systems of adaptation that include cholecystokinin(B) receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid-nitric oxide cascade. Drugs that inhibit function of these systems attenuate tolerance development.

Hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection: long-lasting block prevents early hyperalgesia in the receptive field of the surviving nerve

The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that a long-lasting N-butyl tetracaine nerve block (>2 wk) would be much more effective in the prevention of hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection than the short-lasting lidocaine block. The study was performed with the use of the saphenous nerve section model in rats. The saphenous nerve was exposed and injected with saline, lidocaine (37 mM), or N-butyl tetracaine (37 mM). Ten minutes later, the nerve was transected in some of the rats. The development of mechanical hyperalgesia (pressure threshold) of the hindpaw was assessed during a 5-wk period. In rats with saphenous nerve transection without nerve block (saline injection), 3 h after the transection, the pressure threshold decreased by approximately 30% (from 175+/-11 g to 122+/-23 g, P < 0.0001); the threshold increased somewhat the next day, then it remained stable for 2 wk, with a slow process of recovery afterward. N-butyl tetracaine block without nerve transection caused a slow-developing decrease in the pressure threshold with the first statistically significant change at the sixth day. The comparison of the preventive effects of lidocaine and N-butyl tetracaine blocks on early hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection demonstrated that both lidocaine and N-butyl tetracaine prevented hyperalgesia 3 h after the transection. However, the protective effect of lidocaine disappeared the next day. In contrast, N-butyl tetracaine prevented early hyperalgesia for almost a week. The slow-developing late hyperalgesia caused by long-lasting nerve block makes it impossible to study the protective effect of such a block on late hyperalgesia caused by axotomy. As far as early hyperalgesia is concerned, the preventive effect of the N-butyl tetracaine was much longer than that of lidocaine and continued for approximately 1 wk.

IMPLICATIONS

A long-lasting nerve block can prevent early hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection.

Isobolographic analysis of propofol-thiopental hypnotic interaction in surgical patients

Drugs acting via the same mechanism interact additively, whereas a supraadditive effect can result from an interaction of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Hypnotic midazolam-propofol and midazolam-thiopental interactions are supraadditive. In contrast to midazolam, the mechanisms of actions of propofol and thiopental are quite similar. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that similarity in the mechanisms of action of propofol and thiopental results in the additive hypnotic interaction. We studied the hypnotic effects of thiopental, propofol, and their combinations in 150 unpremedicated patients in a randomized, double-blind fashion. The ability to open eyes on command was used as an end point. Dose-response curves for the drugs given separately and in combinations at three different dose ratios between the drugs were determined by using a probit procedure, and the 50% effective dose values were compared by using isobolographic and algebraic (fractional) analysis. The hypnotic propofol-thiopental combination was additive with all dose ratios between components of the combination. The absence of propofol-thiopental synergy, as demonstrated with midazolam-thiopental or propofol-midazolam combinations, suggests that the mechanisms underlying the hypnotic effects of propofol and thiopental, in contrast to the above combinations with midazolam, are very similar and could be identical.

IMPLICATIONS

The propofol-thiopental hypnotic interaction is additive.

The peripheral effect of fentanyl on postoperative pain

The clinical value of the analgesic effect of opioids administered peripherally (except for intraarticular administration) has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that fentanyl, added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, can enhance postoperative analgesia via a peripheral mechanism. Patients with inguinal herniorrhaphy performed under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 10 each). At the end of surgery, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% and fentanyl 0.001% (10 microg) in one group; in the other group, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% alone (and fentanyl 10 microg IM contralaterally). The following variables were determined in a double-blind manner: the duration of anesthesia (response to a von Frey filament), the duration of analgesia (time to mild postoperative pain), postoperative meperidine consumption, intensity visual analog scale of spontaneous and movement-associated pain 24 h after surgery, and wound pain threshold 24 h after surgery (pressure algometry). The addition of fentanyl for wound infiltration enhanced the duration of anesthesia (130+/-37 vs 197+/-27 min; P < 0.001) and decreased the intensity of spontaneous (50+/-17 vs 19+/-18 mm; P < 0.002) and movement-associated (56+/-15 vs 26+/-21 mm; P < 0.002) pain 24 h postoperatively. Differences between groups for other variables were not statistically significant. Fentanyl added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration after spinal anesthesia can enhance postoperative analgesia by a peripheral mechanism.

IMPLICATIONS

Fentanyl can enhance analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. Added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, it may be of benefit for the relief of postoperative pain.

Rapid development of tolerance to analgesia during remifentanil infusion in humans

Studies in experimental animals have demonstrated a rapidly developing acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of opioids administered by continuous i.v. infusion. The aim of the present study was to determine whether acute tolerance plays an important role in the analgesic effect of remifentanil provided by i.v. infusion to humans. The analgesic effect of remifentanil, infused at a constant rate of 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 4 h, was evaluated by measuring pain tolerance with thermal (2 degrees C water) and mechanical (pressure) noxious stimulations in 13 paid volunteers. The constant-rate infusion of remifentanil resulted in a threefold increase in pain tolerance with both tests. After reaching its maximum in 60-90 min, the analgesic effect of remifentanil began to decline despite the constant-rate infusion, and after 3 h of infusion, it was only one fourth of the peak value. A comparative rate in the development of acute tolerance measured in terms of time to 50% recovery during infusion was 129 +/- 27 min (mean +/- SD) with the cold water test and 138 +/- 39 min with the pressure test. We conclude that the development of tolerance should be included in the calculations for target-controlled infusions.

IMPLICATIONS

Our study shows that tolerance to analgesia during remifentanil infusion is profound and develops very rapidly. The administration of opioids during anesthesia based on target-controlled infusions should include corrections for the development of tolerance.

Effect of subarachnoid bupivacaine block on anesthetic requirements for thiopental in rats

BACKGROUND

Subarachnoid bupivacaine blockade has been reported to reduce thiopental and midazolam hypnotic requirements in patients. The purpose of this study was to examine if local anesthetically induced lumbar intrathecal blockade would reduce thiopental requirements for blockade of motor responses to noxious and nonnoxious stimuli in rats.

METHODS

After intrathecal and external jugular catheter placement, rats were assigned randomly to two groups in a crossover design study, with each rat to receive either 10 microl of 0.75% bupivacaine or 10 microl of normal saline intrathecally. The doses of intravenously administered thiopental required to ablate the eyelid reflex, to block the withdrawal reflex of a front limb digit, and to block the corneal reflex were compared. In two separate groups of animals, hemodynamic parameters and concentrations of thiopental in the brain were compared between intrathecally administered bupivacaine and saline.

RESULTS

The thiopental dose required to block the described responses was decreased with intrathecally administered bupivacaine versus intrathecally administered saline from (mean +/- SD) 40 +/- 5 to 24 +/- 4 mg/kg (P < 0.001) for the eyelid reflex, from 51 +/- 6 to 29 +/- 6 mg/kg (P < 0.005) for front limb withdrawal, and from 67 +/- 8 to 46 +/- 8 mg/kg (P < 0.01) for the corneal reflex. The concentration of thiopental in the brain at the time of corneal reflex blockade for the group given bupivacaine was significantly lower than in the group given saline (24.1 vs. 35.8 microg/g, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that lumbar intrathecally administered local anesthetic blockade decreases anesthetic requirements for thiopental for a spectrum of end points tested. This effect is due neither to altered pharmacokinetics nor to a direct action of the local anesthetic on the brain; rather, it is most likely due to decreased afferent input.

Effect of prolonged nerve block on inflammatory hyperalgesia in rats: prevention of late hyperalgesia

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that the duration of the nociceptive block may be an important factor in determining the effect of the block on injury-induced hyperalgesia after block resolution. The authors examined whether a tonicaine nerve block lasting for 12 to 16 h could prevent late inflammatory hyperalgesia.

METHODS

Inflammatory hyperalgesia was induced by injection of carrageenan into the rat paw. A threshold of motor response to increasing pressure was determined for the injected paw, contralateral paw, and tail The development of edema of the paw and an increase in paw temperature also were determined. The block was achieved by simultaneous percutaneous injections of tonicaine (a new long-acting anesthetic agent) or lidocaine at the sciatic nerve (greater trochanter level) and the saphenous nerve (midthigh level).

RESULTS

Carrageenan without nerve block caused a profound primary (injected paw) and secondary (contralateral paw and tail) hyperalgesia that lasted for 3-5 days. Tonicaine nerve block administered before carrageenan completely prevented primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Tonicaine block administered 5 h after carrageenan injection reversed secondary hyperalgesia and prevented the development of late (> or = 24 h) primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Edema and temperature of the paw were not significantly affected by the nerve block administered before or after carrageenan.

CONCLUSIONS

A prolonged nerve block (12-16 h) can prevent the development of long-lasting (3-5 days) inflammatory hyperalgesia. Prevention of late hyperalgesia can be provided not only by the preinjury block but also by the postinjury block administered when hyperalgesia is already well established.

Pharmacokinetic nature of tachyphylaxis to lidocaine: peripheral nerve blocks and infiltration anesthesia in rats

Tachyphylaxis to peripheral neural blockade was determined with repeated injections of a constant dose of lidocaine in three experimental models: sciatic nerve block, produced by intraneural or extraneural injections, and infiltration anesthesia. A decrease in the duration of the subsequent blocks was used as the index of tachyphylaxis development. The anesthetic content in the nerve or skin was determined using radiolabeled lidocaine. Repeated injections of a constant dose of lidocaine resulted in a marked decrease in the duration of the blocks. Accelerated decline in lidocaine content of nerve or skin was observed with repeated blocks. Our data show that tachyphylaxis rapidly develops with both sciatic nerve blocks and infiltration anesthesia. The data also suggest that the mechanism is largely pharmacokinetic in nature.

Anesthetic interactions following bolus injections

The article presents two main principles of anesthetic interactions: (1) In contrast to the interactions of inhalational anesthetics (when deviations from additivity are debatable), profound synergistic and antagonistic anesthetic interactions between different classes of intravenous drugs are possible due to the difference in the mechanism of their action, (2) A combination of intravenous anesthetics may provide different outcomes (addition, synergism, or antagonism) regarding different components of anesthesia (eg, unconsciousness or movement to noxious stimulation) because the components, even if induced by one anesthetic drug, have different underlying mechanisms.

Effect of midazolam on development of acute tolerance to alfentanil: the role of pharmacokinetic interactions

This study in rats was performed to explore whether the inhibitory effect of midazolam on the development of acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of alfentanil is due to pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Analgesia was determined with tail-compression and hot-plate tests. Alfentanil and midazolam concentrations in plasma and the brain were measured using a radioimmunoassay and chromatographic technique, respectively. After the 4-h period of alfentanil administration (155 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) after a 50-microg/kg bolus), when acute tolerance had already developed, midazolam (2-mg/kg bolus) enhanced the alfentanil-induced analgesia by 120% (P < 0.001) with the tail-compression test and 76% (P < 0.01) with the hot-plate test. At the height of midazolam-induced enhancement of the analgesic effect of alfentanil, the measurements of the alfentanil and midazolam plasma and brain concentrations did not demonstrate any significant changes in the drugs' concentrations. The results confirm that midazolam attenuates the development of acute tolerance to the analgesic effect of alfentanil and indicate that this interaction is not pharmacokinetic.

Time course characteristics of acute tolerance development to continuously infused alfentanil in rats

The time course of the development of acute tolerance to alfentanil was characterized in rat experiments using various algorithms of continuous infusion of the drug. To maintain analgesia at a constant level (tail compression test), alfentanil use was steadily increased: Time to 50% increase in alfentanil use was 255 +/- 98 min with analgesia maintained at a level of 50% increase in the pressure threshold, and 203 +/- 116 min with analgesia maintained at a level of 200% increase. With the use of the alfentanil infusion regimen designed to rapidly achieve and maintain the constant alfentanil plasma concentration (120 ng/mL), the rate of development of acute tolerance, measured in terms of time to 50% recovery during continuing infusion, was 81 +/- 26 min with the compression test and 88 +/- 38 min with the hot-plate test, but 374 +/- 46 min with the rotarod test (P < 0.0001). Thus we demonstrated rapid development of acute tolerance to continuously infused alfentanil with different methods of tolerance assessment. The results also indicate that the time course of tolerance development does not depend on the type of noxious stimulation (mechanical versus thermal) if the response is organized predominantly supraspinally, and that acute tolerance to the direct effect of alfentanil on motor functions does not mask the rapid development of tolerance to its analgesic effect.

Ketamine enhances local anesthetic and analgesic effects of bupivacaine by peripheral mechanism: a study in postoperative patients

Patients with unilateral (n = 14) and bilateral (n = 4) herniorrhaphy participated in this study. With bilateral herniorrhaphy, at the end of the surgery, the wound was infiltrated with a solution of bupivacaine 0.5% and ketamine 0.3% on one side and a solution of bupivacaine 0.5% only, on the other. With unilateral herniorrhaphy, the patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 7). One group at the end of the surgery received the infiltration with a solution of bupivacaine 0.5% and ketamine 0.3%, the other group received the infiltration with a solution of bupivacaine 0.5% only. The duration of the local anesthetic (response to a von Frey filament) and postoperative analgesic (time to mild spontaneous pain) effects of the infiltrations, as well as wound pain threshold 24 h after surgery (pressure algometry), were determined. In patient with unilateral herniorrhaphy, the addition of ketamine for wound infiltration enhanced the duration of infiltration anesthesia (206 +/- 76 versus 343 +/- 108 min, P < 0.02) and analgesia (240 +/- 45 versus 420 +/- 151 min, P < 0.03). Similar enhancement of the local anesthetic effect was observed in patients with bilateral herniorrhaphy. The increase in pain threshold to pressure on the wound with the addition of ketamine was evident in bilateral herniorrhaphy patients and also with a combination of bilateral and unilateral results (1.39 +/- 0.40 versus 2.35 +/- 0.92 kg, P < 0.02). In the group of five volunteers, the subcutaneous infiltration with 0.3% ketamine produced a local anesthetic effect lasting only 10-20 min. The results indicate that ketamine acting via a peripheral mechanism can profoundly enhance anesthetic and analgesic actions of a local anesthetic administered for infiltration anesthesia.