P4-07-04: Nomogram Including Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Count before and during Chemotherapy for Individual Survival Prediction of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Background

CTC count before a new line of treatment and CTC count early changes under chemotherapy have been reported as an independent prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer in a recent pooled analysis in 841 pts (Liu M. ASCO 2011). The aim of this study was to build a prognostic tool including CTC and other parameters to assesse its predictive value for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods: Data from the IC 2006–04 study were used. This prospective multicentre study included 267 metastatic breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy, in whom appropriate pre-treatment prognostic variables (age, performance status, number of metastatic sites, disease-free interval, ER, PR and HER2 status, tumor grade, LDH, serum markers, CTC count by CellSearch technique before treatment and before cycle 2) were available for statistical analysis. We constructed a multivariate Cox regression model for PFS and OS prediction. A stepwise selection process was applied to achieve the most informative and parsimonious models. Performance was measured with the C-index statistic. Internal validation was performed using leave-two-out technique.

Results: Four nomograms have been obtained, in two clinical settings: at inclusion (before the start of any treatment) taking into account the initial CTC count, and during treatment (before cycle 2) taking into account CTC changes under treatment. Their accuracy was good for PFS and OS prediction, with C-index ranging from 0.72 to 0.88. Internal validations allow considering a good accuracy of the models in an external population.

Conclusion: These clinically relevant nomograms are a simple tool for a personalized prognostic assessment including CTC assessment. Validation on independent series of patients are ongoing.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-04.

OT3-01-11: A Randomized, Phase II Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating MetMAb and/or Bevacizumab in Combination with Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background

Dysregulation of the HGF/Met pathway has been associated with tumorigenesis in many malignancies, including the basal sub-type of triple-negative breast cancer. MetMAb (RG3638) is a recombinant, humanized, monovalent monoclonal antibody directed against Met. By binding to the extracellular domain of Met, MetMAb selectively blocks ligand binding and subsequent activation by HGF. Pre-clinical data support the efficacy of combining MetMAb with numerous chemotherapy agents and with targeted agents including bevacizumab and erlotinib. In clinic, MetMAb has been generally well tolerated as a single agent (Phase I), in combination with bevacizumab (Phase Ib) and with bevacizumab in a dose escalation/expansion study (Phase Ib)1 as well as in combination with erlotinib in patients with previously treated NSCLC2. The combination of MetMAb + erlotinib in NSCLC demonstrated significant benefit in both PFS and OS in patients with Met diagnostic positive tumors whereas those patients with Met diagnostic negative tumors demonstrated a detrimental effect in both PFS and OS. The most commonly reported adverse events associated with MetMAb are peripheral edema and fatigue.

Methods: This clinical trial is a randomized three-arm Phase II study in patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, which makes up the majority of basal sub-type breast cancer. Patients will be randomized (1:1:1) to either paclitaxel + bevacizumab + placebo; paclitaxel + placebo + MetMAb; or paclitaxel + bevacizumab + MetMAb. The primary endpoint of this study is PFS in all patients and by Met diagnostic status. Secondary endpoints include an evaluation of OS, ORR, safety, and pharmacokinetics. To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, and 10 patients have been treated.

Primary and secondary analyses will include all randomized patients, with patients analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were assigned. Kaplan-Meier methodology will be used to estimate the median PFS for each treatment arm. An estimate of the HR with 95% CI will be determined using a Cox regression model with an indicator variable for the MetMAb-containing arm. Safety will be assessed through summaries of adverse events and will include all patients who receive any amount of study treatment.

This study remains open for accrual; further details on the trial can be found on the ClinicalTrials.gov website under NCT01186991.

1. Moss et al, In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2–6; Orlando, FL; AACR 2011 (abstr 4717).

2. Spigel et al, J Clin Oncol 29:2011 (suppl; abstr 7505).

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-11.

Abstract A134: Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of iniparib for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background: Iniparib (BSI-201) is an investigational anticancer agent whose mechanism of action is under study. In breast cancer cell lines and xenograft models of TNBC, iniparib has anti-proliferative activity and potentiates the cell cycle effects of some DNA damaging agents. In a randomized, open-label phase 2 study in patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC), iniparib combined with gemcitabine (G) and carboplatin (C) improved efficacy outcomes compared with GC alone. In a confirmatory phase 3 study, GCI failed to meet pre-specified criteria for PFS and OS; however, an exploratory subset analysis suggested a potential benefit among 2nd/3rd line patients (O'Shaughnessy et al. ASCO 2011). Here we report the pharmacokinetic and metabolism results of two clinical studies.

Methods and Results: In a Phase 1, open-label study (BEX11505; NCT01161836) following the administration of 400 mg [14C]-iniparib to 2 male and 5 female patients with solid tumors, approximately 73% of the radioactivity was excreted in urine and 16% in feces. Less than 0.5% of the dose in excreta was unchanged drug. Iniparib accounted for approximately 11% of the total radioactivity in plasma. Two metabolites, 4-iodo-3-amino-benzamide (IABM) and 4-iodo-3-amino-benzoic acid (IABA), which represent biotransformation through the nitro-reduction pathway, were only 0.4% and 1.9% of unchanged drug, respectively. The plasma t1/2 of iniparib averaged 11 minutes, while that of IABM and IABA was 0.8 h and 2.1 h, respectively. The major circulating metabolites of iniparib were products of iodine substitution with glutathione, followed by further metabolism mainly to the cysteine derivative (SAR291066) and the N-acetylated cysteine derivative (SAR289336). The sum of these three metabolites in plasma accounted for approximately 66% of the measured radioactivity. Other routes of metabolism included hydrolysis to form benzoic acid derivatives and further metabolism by glycine conjugation and nitro-reduction to IABM and IABA. The majority of the dose excreted via urine was as SAR291066 (31%) and SAR289336 (16%).

In the phase 2 randomized trial (TCD11418; NCT01045304), iniparib was administered as a 60-min IV infusion either twice weekly on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 at 5.6 mg/kg (arm A) or weekly on days 1, and 8 at 11.2 mg/kg (arm B), in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin every 3 weeks in women with mTNBC. Pharmacokinetic parameters of iniparib and its two metabolites (IABA and IABM) were calculated based on their plasma concentrations in 69 patients (n=34 in arm A; n=35 in arm B). Iniparib, IABA, and IABM levels following a single 11.2 mg/kg dose were higher than after a 5.6 mg/kg dose, with a 2-fold increase in dose resulting in a 1.57, 2.35, and 2.04-fold increase of AUC on Day 1 in Cycle 1. The t1/2 of iniparib was short, with geometric mean values of 19 min and 25.7 min for arms A and B, respectively. The t1/2 of IABA and IABM for arms A and B were; 1.75 h and 1.78 h, and 0.793 h and 0.814 h, respectively. There was no apparent accumulation of iniparib, IABA, and IABM after repeated iniparib dosing with the present dosing regimen.

Conclusion: Iniparib is rapidly metabolized and cleared from plasma with a short t1/2 of 10–20 min and much of the drug being converted to inactive glutathione adducts. Evidence for biotransformation via nitro-reduction was seen by detection of IABM and IABA in plasma.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A134.

Low immunogenicity of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine among patients receiving docetaxel for a solid tumour: results of a prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving cytotoxic therapy for solid tumours are at risk of severe influenza. However, few data are available regarding the immunogenical efficacy of influenza vaccine in these patients.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 25 patients with breast (n=13) or prostate (n=12) cancer received a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine along with docetaxel (Taxotere) administration. The influenza virus type A and B antibody titres were measured using haemagglutinin inhibition (Garten et al, 2009) before and 21 days after the vaccination. Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of patients with an increase in the serum titres ≥ 4 after vaccination.

RESULTS

Median age was 65 years (range: 33-87 years); 52% were females. Seroconversion rates were low: 28% (95% CI: 23.1-33.3) for H1N1, 8% (95% CI: 7.7-8.3) for H3N2 and 16% (95% CI: 7.7-25) for the B strain. The geometric mean titres ratios were 2.16 (H1N1), 1.3 (H3N2) and 1.58 (B). No serious adverse event (AE) related to the vaccine was reported. All the reported AE were from mild-to-moderate intensity.

CONCLUSION

In the patients receiving docetaxel for solid tumours, influenza vaccine triggers an immune response in only one third. Strategies using more immunogenic influenza vaccines must be evaluated in such patients.

Abstract P4-04-04: Polarity Abnormalities in Invasive Carcinomas of the Breast: Analysis of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast

Aims: Invasive micropapillary carcinomas (IMPC) are rare (<2% of all invasive breast carcinomas) and characterized by clusters of cells with an inverted polarity surrounded by a clear space that separate them from the extracellular matrix. These tumors harbor vascular invasion and axillary lymph node involvement in more than 70% of the cases. We performed a detailed analysis of cellular polarity in a series of 25 IMPC to get insight in the putative role of proteins involved in the maintenance of cellular polarity in that carcinoma subtype.

Methods: Polarity analysis has been performed by immunohistochemistry on a tissue-micro-array of a series of twenty-five invasive micropapillary carcinomas. Apical (p-ERM, a marker of phosphorylated ezrin, moesin and radixin, aPKCz, MUC1 and GM130, a marker of the golgi apparatus), basal (collagen IV), or baso-lateral (EGFR, E-cadherin, b-catenin and ERBB2) markers were assessed.

Results: Apical markers MUC1, aPKCz, P-ERM were expressed at the external cellular pole in 88% (22/25), 60% (15/25) and 40% (10/25) of the cases respectively. Notably, 15/25 (60%) were p-ERM negative. Twenty-four cases/25 (96%) demonstrated a GM130 localisation at the external pole of the cells, with an abnormal internal and external localisation of the labelling in 15/24 positive cases (62%). Finally, 24% (6/25) cases presented all these apical markers located at the external part of the cells and 92% (23/25) had at least one of the apical markers in external position. The large majority of the cases (96%; 24/25) demonstrated no collagen IV labelling at the external part of the cell clusters. Intercellular junction proteins E-cadherin and b-catenin were expressed in all cases with a complete absence of staining at the apical inverted pole for both markers. Interestingly, a thick and strong labelling was observed for E-cadherin and for b-catenin in 36% (9/25) and 92% (23/25) of the cases respectively. EGFR was negative in 24 out of the 25 cases (96%). In contrast, ERBB2 was overexpressed in 6/25 (24%) of cases with a membranous ERBB2 labelling except external at the inverted apical pole. EGFR and ERBB2 are considered in normal cells as a baso-lateral marker. Conclusion: IMPC present a clear inverted apical pole MUC-1 and/or aPKCz and/or phospho-ERM positive with the golgi apparatus facing the external membrane of cell clusters, oriented towards the clear space and the extracellular matrix. The intercellular junctions in IMPC are abnormal with a thick E-cadherin and b-catenin labelling compared to normal cells. These abnormal cell orientation and junctions could be a consequence of molecular alterations that are currently being analysed in our laboratory, and that could explain the high frequency of loco-regional lymphatic tumor extension observed in IMPC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-04.

Phase III trial of sunitinib (SU) in combination with capecitabine (C) versus C in previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC)

LBA1011

Background: Recent trials support combining an antiangiogenic agent with chemotherapy (CT) in pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic BC (MBC). SU, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor demonstrated single-agent activity (11% ORR) in heavily pretreated pts with MBC. Antitumor activity with SU+C was reported in pts with advanced solid tumors. This multicenter, randomized, phase III trial (SUN 1099) compared the efficacy and safety of SU + C vs. C in pts with ABC.

Methods: Eligibility criteria were: age ≥18 yrs, ECOG PS ≤1, measurable HER2-positive (FISH+, CISH+ or IHC3+) or -negative ABC, no brain metastases, prior treatment (tx) with an anthracycline and taxane in the (neo)adjuvant or metastatic setting, and ≤2 prior CT regimens for advanced disease. Prior C tx was not permitted. Pts were randomized (1:1) to combination tx with C 2,000 mg/m2/d po days 1–14 every q3w + SU 37.5 mg/d po daily, or to C 2,500 mg/m2/d days 1–14 q3w. Pts with progressive disease per RECIST on the C arm were offered single-agent SU (37.5 mg/d). Endpoints included PFS (primary), ORR, OS, QoL, and safety. Stratified and unstratified log-rank tests compared PFS between arms.

Results: At the data cutoff (December 15, 2009), the ITT population comprised 442 pts: 221 in each arm with baseline characteristics well balanced between arms. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of prolonging PFS based on the independent radiologic assessment nor secondary endpoint of longer OS (final analysis March 10, 2010). Median PFS was 5.5 mos (95% CI 4.5–6.0) in the SU+C arm vs. 5.9 mos (95% CI 5.4–7.6) in the C arm (HR 1.224). Median OS was 16.4 mos (95% CI 13.6–18.4) for the SU+C arm and 16.5 mos (95% CI 14.2–18.6) for the C arm (HR 0.995). ORR was 18.6% for the SU+C arm and 16.3% for the C arm. The most common all causality grade 3/4 AEs (≥10%) were neutropenia (32%), hand–foot syndrome (HFS; 16%), thrombocytopenia (17%), asthenia (12%), fatigue (10%) in the SU+C arm and HFS (24%) and diarrhea (10%) in the C arm. Intended drug delivery for each arm was >80%. Discontinuations due to an AE were more frequent in the SU+C arm vs. the C arm. Discontinuations by drug in the SU+C arm: SU 39%, C 42%, SU and C 33%; in the C arm: 18%.

Conclusions: Data from this randomized phase III trial do not support use of SU+C for therapy of patients with ABC.

[Table: see text]

Analysis of Bevacizumab (Bev) Therapy, Bisphosphonate Use and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) in >1900 Patients Treated in Two Randomized, Controlled Trials

Background: Long-term bisphosphonate therapy is known to increase the risk of ONJ. A 16% incidence of ONJ was reported in a retrospective analysis of 116 patients receiving bisphosphonates with anti-angiogenic therapy (Bev or sunitinib) for bone metastases from breast, colon, or renal cell cancers.Methods: To assess the incidence of ONJ with Bev, we analyzed data from >3500 patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (LR/MBC) treated in three large trials of Bev-containing therapy: AVADO (Bev in combination with docetaxel); RIBBON-1 (Bev in combination with taxane, anthracycline-based combination therapy, or capecitabine); and MO19391 (single-arm safety study of >2000 patients receiving Bev-containing therapy in the general oncology practice context). The incidence of ONJ was compared in patients treated with Bev versus placebo and in patients with or without bisphosphonate exposure.Results: Data from the blinded phase of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated an ONJ incidence of 0.3%. ONJ was more common in patients who also received bisphosphonate therapy than in those who received no bisphosphonates (Table). This observation is supported by data from 2216 patients treated in the single-arm MO19391 study (2.4% with bisphosphonate versus 0% without). AVADO*RIBBON-1**TotalIncidence of ONJ, no. of pts (%)Bev (n=492)Pla (n=238)Bev (n=817)Pla (n=412)Bev (n=1309)Pla (n=650)Overall population receiving Bev (n=1309)3 (0.6%)O1 (0.1%)O4 (0.3%)OBisphosphonate (n=233)1 (1.2%)O1 (0.6%)O2 (0.9%)ONo bisphosphonate (n=1076)2 (0.5%)OOO2 (0.2%)O *Bev 15 and 7.5 mg/kg arms pooled**Taxane/anthracycline and capecitabine cohorts pooledConclusions: This is the largest analysis of ONJ in patients receiving Bev for LR/MBC. The 0.3% incidence of ONJ with Bev is considerably lower than previously reported by Christodoulou et al. with anti-angiogenic therapy. As in the general population, the risk of ONJ is increased in patients exposed to bisphosphonates. The 0.9–2.4% incidence seen here in a large population of patients receiving Bev and bisphosphonate therapy is substantially lower than the 16% observed in a small cohort of patients from a retrospective analysis and within the range reported in the literature for bisphosphonates alone (1–4%). Good oral hygiene, dental examination and avoidance of invasive dental procedures remain important in patients receiving bisphosphonates, irrespective of Bev treatment.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 208.

Joint Disorders Frequency and Structural Changes during Anastrozole Adjuvant Treatment in Early Breast Cancer: A Prospective Trial (D5392L00013)

Background:Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are standard adjuvant endocrine-therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. However, main side effects reported are musculoskeletal symptoms. The pathogenic and anatomic features of AI-induced arthralgia have not been clearly defined. The objective of the study was to describe the joint symptoms and structural joint changes in women received adjuvant anastrozoleMethods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer were enrolled in this open, multicentre trial. Anastrozole was administrated 1mg/day p.o. All of them were naïve of AI and tamoxifen treatment. Patients were followed one year with clinical examination every 3 months, ultrasound (US) examination every 6 months, measurements of inflammation biomarkers and cartilage biomarkers of degradation U-CTX-II (urinary C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen) every 6 months and X-rays at baseline and 12 monthsResults: From June 2006 to December 2007, one hundred and fourteen patients (114) were included and 106, with a median age of 61.5 (49-79) years, were followed-up for 1 year.Overall, 33% of patients were previously treated by chemotherapy, (anthracyclines 97%, taxanes 63 %) and 40.6% were receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at tumour diagnosis. The prevalences of arthralgia were 40.6, 59.1 and 60.6 % at baseline, 6 months and 12 months respectively.Among the 63 (59.4%) patients without arthralgia at baseline, 37 patients presented with arthralgia during treatment (26 between baseline and M6, 11 between M6 and M12) with median time to onset of 4 months.In univariate logistic analysis, significant determinant factors of joint disorders at 12 months were previous osteoarthritis and personal history of arthralgia but not the previous HRT or previous adjuvant chemotherapy with taxanes. In multivariate analysis, none of those factors were significant.Clinical examination by rheumatologist and US examination did not show any significant changes of the number of synovitis and tenosynovitis over 12 months.There were no significant changes of the U-CTX-II levels and of joint damages assessed by radiographs. Inflammation biomarkers did not significantly change over 12 months.Conclusion: This prospective study with a systematic rheumatologist follow up of the patients showed that arthralgia occurs early after the beginning of anastrozole therapy (first 6 months); and suggest that joint disorders were not associated with any cartilage degradation after 1 year of treatment.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 801.

Outcome of HER2-Positive (HER2+) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients (MBC) Treated with Trastuzumab (T): An Institutional Based Review

Background: HER2+ status is associated with poor prognosis, high incidence of visceral and brain metastasis. However the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy (CT) significantly improves survival in early and advanced breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to explore the pattern of outcome in a cohort of MBC patients treated with T-based chemotherapy in a single institution. T was approved in Europe in 2000 and in 2001 all pts had access to T according HER2+ status. Methods: Women with de novo or recurrent breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at Institut Curie between 2001 and 2006 with HER2+ status (IHC 3+ or FISH +) were identified from the Institut Curie database. Disease was classified in two groups: patients who received T upfront and those who received T after one or several CT regimens. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of the first metastasis to the date of death or last follow-up and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product method. Results: The final analysis included 244 patients. Median age was 53.4 yrs (29-80). Median time from primary and first metastasis was 22 mths (0-238). Visceral metastasis were present in 153 pts (63%) and 125 pts (51%) presented multiple sites. One hundred pts (42%) developed brain metastasis during the course of disease. One hundred and sixty five pts (68%) received T as first line, 79 pts (32%) after a median of one line of CT (median 1, range 1-5). One hundred and twenty four pts (52%) received more than 3 regimens. The median overall survival was 53 mths (4-113), similar in both groups. However there is a major bias: pts with very aggressive disease not treated upfront with T not have not been offered delayed T and don't appear in the analyzed population. Patients who developed brain metastasis had a median survival of 41 mths (11-90). Complete characteristics of pts will be presented. Conclusions: The introduction of T has altered the natural history of HER2+disease. Even outside a clinical trial, our results show that the addition of T to CT improves the prognosis of MBC patients with HER2+ disease. Prolongation of T after progression with other CT appears beneficial, even in pts with a high disease burden. The high incidence of brain metastases remains an issue in such a population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5107.

Abstract A15: A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the vascular disrupting agent AVE8062 in combination with docetaxel, administered once every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: AVE8062 is a Vascular Disrupting Agent, derivative of Combretastatin A4, which targets endothelium and causes shutdown of blood perfusion. Preclinical synergy between AVE8062 followed by docetaxel prompted clinical exploration of this combination.

Methods: Objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and PK profile of intravenous AVE8062 on day 1 followed by D 75 mg/m2 on day 2 administered once every 3 weeks. Anti-tumor activity was assessed every 2 cycles.

Results: Twenty-nine adult pts with advanced solid tumors (M/F 11/18), median age 51 (range 28–71), were enrolled and treated at AVE8062 dose levels of 11.5 mg/m2 (N=3), 15.5 mg/m2 (N=5), 20 mg/m2 (N=3), 25 mg/m2 (N=6), 30 mg/m2 (N=3), 35 mg/m2 (N=3) and 42 mg/m2 (N=6). Median number of cycles per patient was 3 (range 1–14).

The most common tumor types were breast (n=10) and oesophagus (n=7).

At 25 mg/m2 AVE8062, neutropenic infection at cycle 1 defined DLT in one patient (pt), whereas at 42 mg/m2 AVE8062 grade 3 headache and asthenia in two pts defined DLTs. Additional grade 3 or 4 study drug related adverse events (AE) included sepsis, febrile neutropenia and respiratory failure in one pt at 20 mg/m2 AVE8062, and nail toxicity in 1 pt at 25 mg/m2. The most common grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity was neutropenia (11/29 pts). No other grade 3 or 4 adverse events were experienced by more than 2 pts. Grade ¾ related AEs were: grade 3 anemia, grade 4 sepsis, grade 3 respiratory failure, grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 neutropenic infection, grade 3 nail toxicity, grade 3 oesophageal fistula, grade 3 headache and grade 3 fatigue.

The PK profile of AVE8062, its main metabolite RPR258063 and D were similar to those found in monotherapy studies.

The MTD for the combination AVE8062/D was set at 35/75 mg/m2. Ten additional patients will be enrolled at this dose level then new dose levels of AVE8062 with D 100 mg/m2 will be studied.

Among 23 evaluable pts, 3 had partial responses (breast cancer) and 13 had stable disease (mainly oesophageal cancer, head and neck, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, liver and unknown origin carcinoma).

Conclusion: AVE8062 in combination with D was well tolerated. The recommended dose for this combination is 35 mg/m2 AVE8062 day 1 and 75 mg/m2 D day 2, every 3 weeks.

Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A15.

Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population. Results In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease >or= 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable.

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.

GEP01: A phase I study of lapatinib (L) and vinorelbine (VNR) in HER2 overexpressing (HER2+) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LAMBC) patients (pts): A FNCLCC Group of early phase trials study

1051

Background: Lapatinib is an effective anti-HER-2 therapy in LAMBC pts, currently investigated in the adjuvant setting. Following anthracyclines, taxanes and capecitabine, VNR is an active agent in metastatic setting. Its main toxicity consists of neutropenia and may challenge the standard weekly, day D1 and D8 regimen. We investigated the combination of L + VNR, seeking the recommended dose for further phase II studies and the potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions. Methods: Women with a HER-2+ LAMBC, in progression after ≤ 2 lines of trastuzumab-based treatment were treated with a 7D (D-7 to D0) loading dose of L before starting VNR on a D1 and D8 q3w IV regimen. L was given orally continuously. Primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) with G-CSF was not permitted. Dose levels (DL, L [mg]/VNR [mg/m2]) ranged from 750/20 to 1250/30 with 3 pts/DL (6 in case of dose-limiting toxicity [DLT]). DLT was defined on tolerance at cycle 1 and included grade (gr) 4 neutropenia (PN) ≥ 7D, FN, thrombocytopenia (gr4 or symptomatic gr3), omission of D8 for haematological toxicity, and any drug-related gr3–4 non-haematological toxicity. PK samples were collected on 7 points on D1 of cycle 1 for L and VNR dosages. Results: From August 2007 to December 2008, 15 evaluable pts were enrolled (median age 58 [46–75], 43% PS 0, 8 pts previously exposed to only 1 line of trastuzumab) and 65 cycles were administered. Toxicity is available for 13 pts. Of 3 pts treated at DL4 (1000/25), 2 developed a DLT: 1 FN and 1 gr4 PN > 7D. Other significant toxicities (% pts) included gr2 anaemia 8%, gr4 PN 46%, gr1 diarrhoea 62%, gr2 nausea/vomiting 8%, gr1 skin rash 23%, gr2 transaminases 23%; no decrease of cardiac function occurred. From DL1 to DL3 (750/20, 1000/22.5), total body clearance of VNR decreased by 50% (32 ± 19 L/h vs 17 ± 7 L/h). Conclusions: Maximal tolerated dose has been reached at 1000/22.5 for the combination of L with VNR given on a D1 and D8 q3w schedule. Given a potential PK interference which would yield to higher exposure to VNR, an intermediate DL is going to be explored (1250/22.5) to allow an accurate definition of the recommanded dose of the combination for future phase II comparison studies.

[Table: see text]

Neratinib in combination with trastuzumab for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: A phase I/II study

1004

Background: Neratinib (HKI-272) is an orally administered irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In an ongoing phase II study, the preliminary objective response rate was 26% in patients with ErbB2+ advanced breast cancer with prior trastuzumab therapy. This study assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination of neratinib plus trastuzumab. Methods: Patients with advanced ErbB2+ breast cancer that progressed following trastuzumab therapy were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 16-week progression free survival rate (PFS). In part 1 (dose escalation), patients received neratinib 160 mg or 240 mg daily plus trastuzumab 4 mg/kg IV loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly. In part 2, patients received weekly trastuzumab with neratinib 240 mg daily. Timed blood samples were collected for PK analyses. PK analysis is ongoing. Results: 45 patients (part 1 n = 8; part 2 n = 37) were enrolled (mean age 52 yr); 9 are active. In part 1, cohorts 1 and 2 were fully enrolled with 4 patients each. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Most common AEs, any grade, were diarrhea (91%), nausea (51%), anorexia (40%), vomiting (38%), and asthenia (27%). Grade 3/4 AEs were diarrhea (13%), nausea (4%), vomiting (4%). Two patients receiving neratinib 240 mg reported AEs leading to withdrawal. No AEs of congestive heart failure and no significant drops of left ventricular ejection fraction were reported. Among 33 patients evaluable for efficacy, objective response rate was 27% (95% CI, 13% - 46%); 16-week PFS rate (for part 2) 47% (95% CI, 29% - 63%); median PFS was 19 weeks (95% CI 15 - 32 weeks). Conclusions: Neratinib plus trastuzumab was well tolerated with no significant or unexpected toxicities, and demonstrated clinical activity.

[Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of neratinib (HKI-272) in combination with vinorelbine in patients with solid tumors

e14554

Background: Neratinib (HKI-272) is a potent irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Preclinical studies have shown synergistic antitumor activity with the combination of trastuzumab plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer.The recommended dose of neratinib in monotherapy is 240 mg. In this phase 1 study, a combination dose of neratinib plus vinorelbine that is tolerable was determined in patients (pts) with solid tumors. Methods: This is an open-label, 2-part study of ascending multiple daily oral doses of neratinib (160 mg, 240 mg) in combination with 25 mg/m2 IV vinorelbine (administered on days 1, 8 every 3 wks). Tumor measurements were made every 6 wks by modified RECIST criteria. Results: 6 pts have been treated at each dose level. Data for 12 pts (5 pts still ongoing) as of 30 Oct 2008 are presented (median age [range] of 53.5 [38–75] yrs; 83% female). The median duration of treatment [range] was 1.9 [1.5–2.7] m. There was only 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 neuropathy (pt had preexisting grade 1 neuropathy) at 160 mg neratinib-25 mg/m2 vinorelbine, so the dose was escalated to 240 mg neratinib- 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine. In this cohort, there were no DLTs, and since the neratinib and vinorelbine doses reached full standard doses there was no need for further dose escalation. AEs, any causality, all grades in ≥ 15% of pts included diarrhea (92%), nausea (67%), constipation (50%), fatigue (42%), vomiting and anthralgia (33% each), abdominal pain and anorexia, (25% each), anemia and neutropenia (17% each). Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred in ≥1 pt included neutropenia (2 pts), pneumonia (1 pt) and peripheral neuropathy (2 pts). Preliminary efficacy data show that 1 pt with stomach cancer had stable disease, lasting ≥21 weeks. Conclusions: The combination of 240 mg neratinib and 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine was found to be tolerable and to demonstrate early evidence of clinical benefit in pts with solid tumors, to be assessed further in pts with metastatic ErbB-2+ breast cancer in part 2.

[Table: see text]

RIBBON-1: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) for first-line treatment of HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

1005

Background: B in combination with weekly paclitaxel or docetaxel (D) as 1st-line therapy for MBC has improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with the respective taxane alone in two large Phase III trials. This study investigated the addition of B to standard 1st-line chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Methods: Patients were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive B + chemotherapy or placebo (pl) + chemotherapy. Prior to randomization, investigators chose capecitabine (Cap) (2000 mg/m2 x 14d), taxane (T) (nab-paclitaxel [260 mg/m2] or D [75 or 100 mg/m2], q3wk), or anthracycline (Ant)-based chemotherapy (q3wk). B or pl was administered at 15 mg/kg q3wk. Key eligibility criteria included MBC or locally-recurrent disease, no prior cytotoxic treatment, ECOG PS 0 or 1, HER2-negative disease and no CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), independent review of PFS, and safety. At progression, all patients were eligible for B with 2nd line chemotherapy. The Cap cohort and the pooled T or Ant (T + Ant) cohort were independently powered and analyzed in parallel using two-sided stratified log-rank test (Cap: 80% power to detect HR=0.75; T + Ant: 90% power to detect HR=0.7). Results: RIBBON-1 enrolled 1237 patients (Cap, 615; T, 307; Ant, 315) from 12/05 to 8/07 in 22 countries with a median follow-up of 15.6 months in the Cap cohort and 19.2 months in the T + Ant cohort. The results are summarized below. OS data are limited with only 33% of events. Safety was consistent with results of prior B trials. Conclusions: The addition of B to Cap, T; or Ant-based chemotherapy regimens used in 1st-line treatment of MBC resulted in statistically-significant improvement in PFS with a safety profile comparable to prior Phase III studies.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in elderly patients

13020

Background: Elderly patients (>70 years) may present different pharmacokinetic profile for many drugs , mainly because of altered elimination due to renal function or metabolic decreases. Methods: Docetaxel, 50 to 85 mg/m2, median 70 mg/m2, was infused during 1 hr to 44 patients, aged 70 to 83 years, median 76.5 years. Three blood samples per patient were obtained according to a limited sampling strategy (Baille et al. Clin Cancer Res 1997, vol. 3, 1535–38). Covariates of interest were carefully recorded, age, body weight, body surface area, gender, serum creatinine, orosomucoid, serum albumin. These data were then analysed using NONMEM V to a) obtain individual Bayesian estimates of docetaxel clearance, b) re-analyse the data in order to estimate population parameters for this elderly population, c) show possible covariate effects on the pharmacokinetic parameters. Results: Median docetaxel CL from Bayesian estimation was 29.1 (2.5–97.5% quantiles 12–49) L/h. When the population was re-analysed per se, docetaxel CL was 29.2 (2.5–97.5% quantiles 17–35) L/h. The inter- subject variability for CL was 25% (precision 32%).. No covariate effect was observed on CL. Conclusions: Docetaxel clearance in elderly patients is slightly decreased, 29 L/h versus 36.8 L/h (reported in 547 patients, mean age 56 years, 5–95% quantiles 39–71 years). The inter-subject-variability of CL in elderly patients was decreased to 25% versus 47.5% in the 547 patients population. A pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic modelling of neutrophil counts versus time will be performed in these elderly patients in order to point a possible different sensitivity of this population to the myelosuppressive effects of docetaxel.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Relationship between glutathione-S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism and docetaxel neurosensory toxicity

2527

Background: Glutathione-S-transferases (GST) regulate the cellular response to oxidative stress and various anticancer agents. We recently underlined the importance of oxidative stress in the side effects of taxanes [Alexandre et al,J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:236–44], and investigated the relationship between the GST isoforms M1, T1 and P1 genes polymorphisms and docetaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methods: We retrospectively analysed GST polymorphisms in a cohort of cancer patients (pts) treated with docetaxel and entered in a clinical trial database. A clinical neurologic evaluation (according to the NCI-CTC v2.0) was performed at baseline and at each treatment cycle. The GST M1 (null genotype), GST T1 (null genotype), and GST P1 (Ile105Val and Ala114Val) polymorphisms were determined using PCR, followed by either sequencing or RFLP techniques. The relationship between GST polymorphisms and grade = 2 neurosenrory toxicity (NST) as primary endpoint was studied, using the Chi2-square (with Yates correction) and the Fischer’s two-tailed exact test. Results: Fifty-eight pts were included : F/M: 29/29; median age: 61 years (range: 47–75). Primary tumor: 27.6% breast, 27.6% prostate, 24.1% lung and 20.7% other cancers. Pts received docetaxel 75–100 mg/m2 given as single-agent. A total of 261 cycles were administered (median/pt: 4, range 2–12). Ten pts developed grade = 2 NST. Twenty-seven pts (47%) were homozygous for the GST P1 105Ile allele, and 31 pts were either homozygous or heterozygous for the GST P1 105Val allele. Grade = 2 NST was significantly more common in pts with GST P1 105Ile/105Ile genotype (8/27 pts, 30%) compared with patients with 105Ile/105Val or 105Val/105Val GSTP1 genotype (2/31 pts, 6,5%; P = 0.047). Pts who were genotyped as GST P1 105Ile/105Ile had a higher risk of developing a grade = 2 NST than did those with other GSTP1 genotypes (OR 6.11; 95% CI, 1.17–31.94; P < 0.05). Conclusions: We found a significant correlation between GST P1 105Ile homozygous genotype and the development of a docetaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

EGF105084, a phase II study of lapatinib for brain metastases in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer following trastuzumab (H) based systemic therapy and cranial radiotherapy (RT)

1012

Background: CNS disease is a major problem among pts treated with H for stage IV HER2+ breast cancer with a reported incidence of 28–43%. This study was designed to characterize further the activity reported with lapatinib in an initial phase II trial in women with HER2+ disease metastatic to brain (Lin et al ASCO ‘06). Methods: Eligible pts had HER2+ breast cancer, prior H therapy and cranial RT, ECOG PS 0–2, and radiographic evidence of progressive brain metastases with at least one measurable (LD = 10mm) brain lesion. Pts received lapatinib 750 mg PO BID. Brain MRIs were obtained at 3.0 mm slices without gaps in the axial dimension. The primary endpoint was CNS response as defined by a = 50% volumetric (vol) reduction of CNS lesions in the absence of: new lesions, need for increased dose of steroids, progressive neurological signs/symptoms (NSS), or progressive extra-CNS disease. CNS disease progression was defined as either a = 40% vol increase from nadir, increase in steroid requirements, or progression of NSS. Results: The study exceeded its accrual goal of 220 pts in < 1 year; 238 pts were enrolled from Jan-Nov 06. Preliminary data from the initial 104 pts have undergone independent radiology review. 8 pts (7.7%) met vol criteria for partial response with a median absolute vol reduction of CNS disease of 3.6 cm3 (range 0.4 to 29.7 cm3). Exploratory analysis revealed that 17 of the initial 104 pts (16.3%) experienced a = 20% vol reduction of CNS disease with a median absolute vol reduction of 3.3cm3. The median time to vol progression in these 17 pts was 16 wks (range 12 -24 wks). Analysis of efficacy and tolerability based upon protocol defined criteria from all 238 pts will be presented. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this large multicenter trial provides evidence that lapatinib has activity based on vol reductions in pts with progressive HER2+ CNS disease following prior H-based systemic therapy and cranial RT. Definitive conclusions will be based on the entire database. Additional studies are warranted incorporating lapatinib in combination with other therapies and/or in a less refractory setting to optimize its use in HER2+ CNS disease.

[Table: see text]

QTc monitoring during a phase I study: experience with SR271425

OBJECTIVE

SR271425 is a thioxanthone cytotoxic drug that induces dose-related cardiac electrophysiologic changes in preclinical models. A phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximally tolerated dose and safety profile, notably cardiac events.

METHODS

SR271425 was administered weekly as a 2-hour single intravenous infusion with a fixed 30 mg/m2 increment at each dose level (DL). A sustained cardiac evaluation was performed. ECG parameters were evaluated at bedside by an investigator or a cardiologist, as well as by central reading for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) determination.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated. Five DLs were explored, from 75 mg/m2/wk to 195 mg/m2/wk. Fourteen patients (87.5%) experienced noncardiac adverse events related to treatment; only 2 patients presented grade 3 toxicity (nausea/vomiting and GGT increase) and no grade 4 toxicities were reported. Asymptomatic grade 1 or 2 QTcF prolongations were observed in 5 patients during central readings, and in 4 cases at bedside. One QTc-DLT, registered at bedside (grade 2), was unconfirmed at central reading, while another QTc-DLT, not noted at bedside, was highlighted by central reading. No arrhythmias or QRS prolongations were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum tolerated dose of SR271425 was not reached in this trial due to early termination of the trial, not related to cardiac toxicity, following the termination of the development program by the sponsor. Sustained ECG monitoring is quite feasible in oncology phase I trials, but discrepancies between bedside and central evaluation could lead to conflicting decisions for management of patient care.

Relationship between cytochrome 3A activity, inflammatory status and the risk of docetaxel-induced febrile neutropenia: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that cancer-related inflammation might increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) induced by docetaxel (DCX, Taxotere), by both affecting the exposure to DCX and the tissue sensitivity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced cancer patients with normal liver function, performance status (PS)<3, were included. Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP 3A) activity was estimated before the first cycle of DCX by a single determination of midazolam plasma concentration, 4 hours after 0.015 mg/kg i.v. bolus. Following the first cycle of 75-100 mg/m2 DCX, clearance and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) were estimated using a limited sampling strategy.

RESULTS

Among 56 assessable patients, 7 FNs occurred after first cycle (13%). In univariate analysis, high midazolam concentration and free DCX AUC were associated with severe neutropenia and FN. In addition to DCX exposure-related parameters, the risk of FN was also correlated with poor PS, baseline lymphopenia and lung cancer, while high ferritin level, indicator of an inflammatory state, reached borderline significance (P=0.07). By multivariate analysis, total DCX AUC and baseline lymphopenia were associated with FN. High midazolam concentration was correlated with elevated ferritin level (r=0.32; P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory status and lymphocyte count should be included in the evaluation of the benefice/risk ratio before the initiation of DCX.

The financial impact of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer: The experience of the Institut Curie

663

Purpose: To estimate, in term of public health on the scale of a region, the cost of trastuzumab and to point out the financial impact of this new targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. Methods: To understand the consequences of the spending on of trastuzumab at a macroeconomic level in the French hospital financing system, we decided to focus on an establishment in particular, and to analyze the increasing spending of trastuzumab at a micro-economic level, to provide a cost analysis of patients treated with trastuzumab for HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 137 medical reports of patients who received trastuzumab either in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent and in maintenance therapy. Median age of the patients was 52 years (range 32- to 79+). Eighty five percent had 3+ HER2 overexpression and fifteen percent had 2+ HER2 (FISH amplified). Results: Median survival from first treatment with trastuzumab was 38.5 months (range 0,04–53,06+). The cost of the first year treatment is in average €43,435.58 per patient, for the second year €36,419.01 and for the third year €37,198.94. Drugs cost represents 78% of the hospital stays cost for a patient and 2.9% of the budget of Institut Curie. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed the very high level of expenses of trastuzumab to treat metastatic breast cancers. With the adjuvant use of trastuzumab, it is expected that these expenses are going to increase exponentially.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long median survival with capecitabine (X) single-agent therapy for patients (pts) with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

10710

Background: X (Xeloda) is an oral fluoropyrmidine with consistently high activity in MBC, a good safety profile with little myelosuppression and no alopecia, and the convenience of oral administration. The addition of X to docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated pts also increases survival. This non-randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QoL) of X in pts with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Main findings from this trial have been published previously [Fumoleau et al. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:536–42]. Here we present mature data after a follow-up of 48 months. Methods: Pts with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC received X 1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 every 3 weeks for a median of 6 cycles (range 1–15). Results: Baseline characteristics of the 126 pts enrolled were typical of a pretreated MBC population. X achieved complete/partial response or stable disease in 63% of patients (overall response rate, 28%). Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4.0–6.4).Median duration of response was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.5–12.7). The only grade 3/4 events occurring in ≥ 10% of patients were diarrhea (10%) and HFS (21%). The most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormality was granulocytopenia (14%). After a follow-up of 48 months, 8 patients are still alive. Updated median overall survival is 15.9 months (95% CI: 13.5–21.3). 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates are 63%, 37% and 17%, respectively. QoL assessment showed that X treatment was associated with an increase in mean Global Health Score up to cycle 6, with the increase maintained at subsequent evaluations. Conclusions: X is highly active in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC, leading to a long median survival of 15.9 months. X is also well tolerated and improves QoL.

[Table: see text]

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of docetaxel: role of CYP3A, MDR1, and GST polymorphisms

OBJECTIVE

Patients initiating docetaxel chemotherapy were genotyped for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, MDR1, GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3, and GSTP1 to identify variability factors of docetaxel pharmacokinetics and toxicity.

METHODS

Genotyping was performed by direct sequencing (CYP3A4), real-time polymerase chain reaction (CYP3A5), and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (MDR1 and GST). The clearance and area under the curve of docetaxel were calculated by use of a Bayesian approach. Absolute neutrophil count was recorded twice weekly.

RESULTS

With regard to the pharmacokinetic analysis, 58 patients were included. CYP3A4*1B carriers (*1A/*1B, n=4), who are also CYP3A5*1/*3 carriers, had a significantly higher clearance and lower dose-normalized area under the curve of docetaxel than those with the wild genotype (*1A/*1A, n=53): 55.2+/-13.5 L/h versus 37.3+/-11.7 L/h (P=.01) and 31.4+/-6.2 (microg . h/L)/(mg/m(2)) versus 52.7+/-18.2 (microg . h/L)/(mg/m(2)) (P=.005), respectively. No influence of MDR1 was evidenced. With regard to the pharmacodynamic analysis, febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in GSTP1*A/*B carriers (31.6% versus 3.7% in *A/*A carriers and 0% in *A/*C, *B/*B, and *B/*C carriers) (P=.037). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred more frequently in 3435TT MDR1 genotype carriers: TT, 100%; CT, 77.3%; and CC, 54.5% (P=.046). No influence of GSTM1, GSTT1, or GSTM3 polymorphisms was evidenced on docetaxel toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients carrying the CYP3A*1B allele may have enhanced docetaxel clearance and may be underexposed, whereas those carrying GSTP1*A/*B and 3435TT genotypes may have excessive hematologic toxicity. Further studies are warranted to determine the usefulness of genotyping before docetaxel treatment.

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine (Xeloda) and irinotecan combination therapy (XELIRI) in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tumours

Capecitabine is a highly active oral fluoropyrimidine that is an attractive alternative to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer treatment. The current study, undertaken in 27 patients with gastrointestinal tumours, aimed to assess the toxicity and potential for significant pharmacokinetic interactions of a combination regimen incorporating capecitabine with 3-weekly irinotecan (XELIRI). Irinotecan (200 and 250 mg m(-2)) was administered as a 90-min infusion on day 1 in combination with escalating capecitabine doses (700-1250 mg m(-2) twice daily) administered on days 2-15 of a 3-week treatment cycle. Pharmacokinetics were characterised on days 1 and 2 of the first two cycles. A total of 103 treatment cycles were administered. The principal dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea and neutropenia. Capecitabine 1150 mg m(-2) twice daily with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was identified as the maximum-tolerated dose and capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was identified as the recommended dose for further study. Analyses confirmed that there were no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between the two agents. The combination was clinically active, with complete and partial responses achieved in heavily pretreated patients. This study indicates that XELIRI is a potentially feasible and clinically active regimen in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus epirubicin (ET) and of 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 142 patients (intent-to-treat (ITT)) with at least one measurable lesion were randomised to receive docetaxel 75 mg m⁻² plus epirubicin 75 mg m⁻² or 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m⁻² plus epirubicin 75 mg m⁻² and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m⁻² intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was only permitted after the first cycle, if required. Per-protocol analysis (n=132) gave an overall response rate for ET of 63.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 50–78%) and for FEC 34.3% (95% CI, 23–47%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. Intent-to-treat population (n=142) gave an overall response rate for ET of 59% (95% CI, 47–70%) and for FEC 32% (95% CI, 21–43%) after a median seven and six cycles, respectively. The median response duration for ET was 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.6 months) and for FEC 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.5–10.4 months). The median time to progression (ITT) for ET was 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–9.6 months) and for FEC 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6–7.8 months). After a median follow-up of 23.8 months, median survival (ITT) for ET and FEC were 34 and 28 months, respectively. Nonhaematologic grade 3–4 toxicities were infrequent in both arms. Haematologic toxicity was more common with ET and febrile neutropenia was reported in 13 patients (18.6%) in the ET group. Two deaths in the ET group were possibly related to study treatment. In conclusion, both ET and FEC were associated with acceptable toxicity. ET is a highly active first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Phase II study of XR5000 (DACA), an inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II, administered as a 120-h infusion in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

XR5000 is a tricyclic carboxamide-based cytotoxic agent that binds to DNA by intercalation and stimulates DNA cleavage by inhibition of both topoisomerase I and II. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antitumoral activity and safety profile of XR5000 given as second-line chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer who had relapsed within 1 year after first-line chemotherapy with taxanes and platinum for advanced disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received XR5000 at the dose of 3010 mg/m(2) through a 120-h central venous infusion every 3 weeks. Toxicity was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 2.0. An independent panel assessed response every two cycles according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Gehan's rule was used for sample size determination.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled; one patient was ineligible because of prior melphalan single agent treatment. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 (eight patients), 1 (five patients), or 2 (two patients). The 15 eligible patients received 43 cycles of XR5000 (median 2, range 1-8). Hematological toxicity was mild with only one grade 3 anemia in one patient. Other drug-related toxicities never exceeded grade 3 and included fatigue (four patients), thrombosis (one patient), nausea (one patient), stomatitis (one patient) as well as dyspnea/cough (one patient). One patient who had refused further therapy and controls after the first cycle was not assessable for response evaluation. No objective responses were observed. Four patients experienced stable disease and 10 patients progressive disease. The median time to progression was 42 days (CI 95% 40; 54).

CONCLUSIONS

The complete lack of any objective response does not justify further evaluation of XR5000 in patients with advanced ovarian cancer using this dose and schedule, although the therapy was generally well tolerated.

Phase II trial combining docetaxel and doxorubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the antitumour activity of docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin for neoadjuvant therapy of patients with breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight women were treated with intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) over 15 min followed by a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Dexamethasone or prednisolone premedication was allowed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not allowed as primary prophylaxis. The primary end point was the pathologically documented complete response rate (pathological response).

RESULTS

The mean relative dose intensity calculated for four or more cycles was 0.99 for doxorubicin and 0.99 for docetaxel. Overall, the pathological response rate was 13%. There were 11 complete and 29 partial clinical responses for an overall response rate of 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 75% to 95%] in the evaluable population (n = 47). Disease-free and overall survival rates were 85% (95% CI 71% to 94%) and 96% (95% CI 85% to 99%), respectively, after a median follow-up of 36.6 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 65% of patients and 17% reported grade 4 febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel and doxorubicin is an effective and well-tolerated combination in the neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Future controlled trials are warranted to investigate the best schedules and to correlate response with biological factors.