The enrichment of Fanconi anemia/homologous recombination pathway aberrations in ATM/ATR-mutated NSCLC was accompanied by unique molecular features and poor prognosis

BACKGROUND

ATM and ATR are two critical factors to regulate DNA damage response (DDR), and their mutations were frequently observed in different types of cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given that the majority of identified ATM/ATR mutations were variants of uncertain significance, the clinical/molecular features of pathogenic ATM/ATR aberrations have not been comprehensively investigated in NSCLC.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses were conducted to investigate the molecular features in 191 NSCLC patients who harbored pathogenic/likely pathogenic ATM/ATR mutations and 308 NSCLC patients who did not have any types of ATM/ATR variants. The results were validated using an external cohort of 2727 NSCLC patients (including 48 with ATM/ATR pathogenic mutations).

RESULTS

Most pathogenic ATM/ATR genetic alterations were frameshift and nonsense mutations that disrupt critical domains of the two proteins. ATM/ATR-mutated patients had significantly higher tumor mutational burdens (TMB; P < 0.001) and microsatellite instabilities (MSI; P = 0.023), but not chromosomal instabilities, than those without any ATM/ATR variations. In particular, KRAS mutations were significantly enriched in ATM-mutated patients (P = 0.014), whereas BRCA2 mutations (P = 0.014), TP53 mutations (P = 0.014), and ZNF703 amplification (P = 0.008) were enriched in ATR-mutated patients. Notably, patients with ATM/ATR pathogenic genetic alterations were likely to be accompanied by mutations in Fanconi anemia (FA) and homologous recombination (HR) pathways, which were confirmed using both the study (P < 0.001) and validation (P < 0.001) cohorts. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of FA/HR aberrations could contribute to increased TMB and MSI, and patients with both ATM/ATR and FA/HR mutations tended to have worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated the unique clinical and molecular features of pathogenic ATM/ATR mutations in NSCLC, which helps better understand the cancerous involvement of these DDR regulators, as well as directing targeted therapies and/or immunotherapies to treat ATM/ATR-mutated NSCLC, especially those with co-existing FA/HR aberrations.

Jejunal mucinous adenocarcinoma: Unusual presentation of a rare pathology

Mucinous adenocarcinoma of jejunum is a rare tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Patients usually present after fifth decade of their life with non-specific symptoms. Delayed diagnosis is commonplace and often the reason for advanced disease and poor prognosis. These tumors may masquerade as other common malignancies, with a conclusive diagnosis only after the final histopathological examination. We present a case of jejunal mucinous adenocarcinoma, disguised as cecal malignancy, in an old female patient, managed with radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. The report reiterates that the mucinous variant of jejunal adenocarcinoma is a rare pathology with an unusual advanced presentation.

One label is all you need: Interpretable AI-enhanced histopathology for oncology

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced histopathology presents unprecedented opportunities to benefit oncology through interpretable methods that require only one overall label per hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slide with no tissue-level annotations. We present a structured review of these methods organized by their degree of verifiability and by commonly recurring application areas in oncological characterization. First, we discuss morphological markers (tumor presence/absence, metastases, subtypes, grades) in which AI-identified regions of interest (ROIs) within whole slide images (WSIs) verifiably overlap with pathologist-identified ROIs. Second, we discuss molecular markers (gene expression, molecular subtyping) that are not verified via H&E but rather based on overlap with positive regions on adjacent tissue. Third, we discuss genetic markers (mutations, mutational burden, microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability) that current technologies cannot verify if AI methods spatially resolve specific genetic alterations. Fourth, we discuss the direct prediction of survival to which AI-identified histopathological features quantitatively correlate but are nonetheless not mechanistically verifiable. Finally, we discuss in detail several opportunities and challenges for these one-label-per-slide methods within oncology. Opportunities include reducing the cost of research and clinical care, reducing the workload of clinicians, personalized medicine, and unlocking the full potential of histopathology through new imaging-based biomarkers. Current challenges include explainability and interpretability, validation via adjacent tissue sections, reproducibility, data availability, computational needs, data requirements, domain adaptability, external validation, dataset imbalances, and finally commercialization and clinical potential. Ultimately, the relative ease and minimum upfront cost with which relevant data can be collected in addition to the plethora of available AI methods for outcome-driven analysis will surmount these current limitations and achieve the innumerable opportunities associated with AI-driven histopathology for the benefit of oncology.

Explore the alterations of downstream molecular pathways caused by ARID1A mutation/knockout in human endometrial cancer cells

PURPOSE

As one of the most common gynecologic malignancies, endometrial cancer (EC) is driven by multiple genetic alterations that may be targeted for treatments. AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) gene mutations were reported as early events in endometrial carcinogenesis.

METHODS

To explore the alterations of downstream molecular pathways caused by ARID1A mutations and the associated therapeutic implications, we edited ARID1A gene in human endometrial cancer cell line Ishikawa using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR-Associated Proteins (CRISPR/Cas9) technology. We successfully constructed a stable Ishikawa cell line with a confirmed 10 bp deletion on the ARID1A gene, which resulted in a code-shift mutation and gene knockout.

RESULTS

Compared with unedited wild-type cells, ARID1A knockout (KO) led to reduced apoptosis, accelerated transformation from G0/G1 to S phase, and enhanced cell proliferation. ARID1A deficiency would reduce the protein levels of p21, caspase 7, and caspase 9 in Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells compared with the wild-type cells. In addition, ARID1A KO resulted in high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Moreover, transcriptomic analyses showed that ARID1A KO can lead to activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling. Furthermore, experimental analyses demonstrated that ARID1A KO cells had reduced expression of genetic instability-associated markers mutL homologue 1 (MLH1) and progesterone receptor B (PR) and increased p-Akt expression.

CONCLUSION

These findings support further exploration of ARID1A as a therapeutic target for EC and provide insight into developing more effective treatments in EC, such as the combinatory use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: A rapidly evolving landscape

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent frequent and severe diseases whose management has radically changed over the last 10 years. With the advent of second- and third-line standard therapies for metastatic GC patients in the 2010s, the molecular dismemberment of the disease and positive trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents will mark the 2020s. New treatment options have emerged in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition to improved multimodal treatment in operable patients, new subgroups have emerged depending on molecular alterations (HER2, Microsatellite instability) or expression of specific proteins in the tumour (PDL1, Claudin 18.2) making immunohistochemistry central in profiling the tumour for an optimal individualised management. The aim of this review is to describe the current standards of management of early and late stage GC and the molecular markers needed today to optimally manage our patients together with future perspectives on this disease.

Current status and prospect of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal tumor in China. While significant progress has been achieved in traditional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy, the prognosis of advanced colorectal cancer is poor, and the five-year survival rate is unsatisfactory. There is an urgent need to explore new treatment modalities. In this review, we examined the latest progress of colorectal cancer immunotherapy and discussed its future prospects.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review to sort out the current status of immunotherapy for different types of colorectal cancer and discussed potential combination therapy options. Results Subsequent line therapy, first-line therapy and neoadjuvant therapy for MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer are discussed. In addition, combination therapy options for patients with MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer are presented. Finally, current valuable biomarkers for immunotherapy are highlighted.

RESULTS

Subsequent line therapy, first-line therapy and neoadjuvant therapy for MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer are discussed. In addition, combination therapy options for patients with MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer are presented. Finally, current valuable biomarkers for immunotherapy are highlighted.

CONCLUSION

This review discussed the current status of immunotherapy for different types of colorectal cancer and biomarkers for immunotherapy.

Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers

BACKGROUND

Accurate determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) status is critical for optimal treatment in cancer patients. Conventional MSI markers can sometimes display subtle shifts that are difficult to interpret, especially in non-colorectal cases. We evaluated an experimental eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers for detection of MSI.

METHODS

The eight marker-panel was comprised of five conventional markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27) and three LMR markers (BAT-52, BAT-59 and BAT-62). MSI testing was performed against 300 specimens of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers through PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis length analysis.

RESULTS

The MSI testing with eight marker-panel showed 99.3% (295/297) concordance with IHC analysis excluding 3 MMR-focal deficient cases. The sensitivity of BAT-59 and BAT-62 was higher than or comparable to that of conventional markers in gastric and endometrial cancer. The mean shift size was larger in LMR markers compared to conventional markers for gastric and endometrial cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSI testing with eight maker-panel showed comparable performance with IHC analysis. The LMR markers, especially BAT-59 and BAT-62, showed high sensitivity and large shifts which can contribute to increased confidence in MSI classification, especially in gastric and endometrial cancers. Further study is needed with large number of samples for the validation of these LMR markers.

Impact of formalin fixation on mismatch repair protein evaluation by immunohistochemistry

Mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) status in colorectal cancer (CRC) has become fundamental as a diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive factor. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered a simple and reliable approach; however, its effectiveness depends on pre-analytic factors. Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different fixation times/protocols on MMR protein IHC quality. Left over tissue from surgically resected CRC samples (cold ischemia time < 30 min) where fixed as follows: standard formalin fixation (24-48 h); hypo-fixation (<20 h); hyper-fixation (>90 h); cold (4°C) fixation (24-48 h); standard fixation for small sample size (0.5×0.5 cm). Samples for each group were collected from 30 resected CRC and the following parameters were evaluated on 600 immunohistochemical stains: intensity of expression; patchiness of staining; presence of central artefact. Forty-six immunoreactions were inadequate (score 0 intensity), the majority regarding MLH1 or PMS2 in the hypo-fixation group (47.8%), followed by the hyper-fixation group (28.1%); cold formalin fixation showed the least inadequate cases. Patchiness and central artefact were more frequent in hypo-fixation and standard fixation group compared to the others. MLH1 (closely followed by PMS2) performed worse with regard to immunostaining intensity (p=0.0002) in the standard and in the hypo-fixation group (p< 0.00001). Using a small sample size improved patchiness/central artefacts. This is the first study specifically created to evaluate the impact of fixation on MMR protein IHC, showing that both formalin hypo- and hyper-fixation can cause problems; 24-h formalin fixation as well as cold (4°C) formalin fixation are recommended for successful IHC MMR evaluation.

Role of microsatellite instability and HER2 positivity in locally advanced esophago-gastric cancer patients treated with peri-operative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) significantly improved the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Several biomarkers, including HER2 and MMR/MSI are crucial for treatment decisions in the advanced stage but, currently, no biomarkers can guide the choice of NAC in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate the role of MSI and HER2 status on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected LAGC patients treated with NAC and surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy from 2006 to 2018. HER2 and MSI were assessed on endoscopic and surgical samples. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated and evaluated for association with downstaging and MSI.

RESULTS

We included 76 patients, 8% were classified as MSI-H, entirely consistent between endoscopic and surgical samples. Six percent of patients were HER2 positive on endoscopic and 4% on surgical samples. Tumor downstaging was observed in 52.5% of cases, with three pCR (5.1%), none in MSI-H cancers. According to MSI status, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were higher for MSI-H patients to MSS [EFS not reached vs 30.0 months, p = 0.08; OS not reached vs 39.6 months, p = 0.10].

CONCLUSION

Our work confirms the positive prognostic effect of MSI-H in the curative setting of LAGC, not correlated with pathologic tumor downstaging. Prospective ad-hoc trial and tumor molecular profiling are eagerly needed.

Does high [18F]FDG uptake always mean poor prognosis? Colon cancer with high-level microsatellite instability is associated with high [18F]FDG uptake on PET/CT

OBJECTIVES

High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-high) is generally associated with higher F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) uptake than stable microsatellite (MSI-stable) tumors. However, MSI-high tumors have better prognosis, which is in contrast with general understanding that high [18F]FDG uptake correlates with poor prognosis. This study evaluated metastasis incidence with MSI status and [18F]FDG uptake.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 108 right-side colon cancer patients who underwent preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT and postoperative MSI evaluations using a standard polymerase chain reaction at five Bethesda guidelines panel loci. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmax tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor were measured using SUV 2.5 cut-off threshold. Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed for continuous variables, and χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was performed for categorical variables (p value of  < 0.05 for statistical significance). Medical records were reviewed for metastasis incidence.

RESULTS

Our study population had 66 MSI-stable and 42 MSI-high tumors. [18F]FDG uptake was higher in MSI-high tumors than MSI-stable tumors (TLR, median (Q1, Q3): 7.95 (6.06, 10.54) vs. 6.08 (4.09, 8.82), p = 0.021). Multivariable subgroup analysis demonstrated that higher [18F]FDG uptake was associated with higher risks of distant metastasis in MSI-stable tumors (SUVmax: p = 0.025, MTV: p = 0.008, TLG: p = 0.019) but not in MSI-high tumors.

CONCLUSION

MSI-high colon cancer is associated with high [18F]FDG uptake, but unlike MSI-stable tumors, the degree of [18F]FDG uptake does not correlate with the rate of distant metastasis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MSI status should be considered during PET/CT assessment of colon cancer patients, as the degree of [18F]FDG uptake might not reflect metastatic potential in MSI-high tumors.

KEY POINTS

• High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-high) tumor is a prognostic factor for distant metastasis. • MSI-high colon cancers had a tendency of demonstrating higher [18F]FDG uptake compared to MSI-stable tumors. • Although higher [18F]FDG uptake is known to represent higher risks of distant metastasis, the degree of [18F]FDG uptake in MSI-high tumors did not correlate with the rate at which distant metastasis occurred.

Synchronous and metachronous primary colorectal cancers with concordant and discordant mismatch repair status

Multiple primary colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) synchronous, when detected approximately at the same time, or metachronous, when a significant amount of time has elapsed between diagnoses can show both mismatch repair (MMR) status concordance and discordance between primary tumors. The aim was to evaluate the MMR status of a monoinstitutional, retrospective cohort of synchronous and metachronous CRCs, with a focus on the frequency of cases with discordant MMR status, and explore the MMR status of metastatic nodal deposits. All synchronous and metachronous CRCs diagnosed in our institution between 2011 and 2023 were collected. Clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated, including MMR status of all CRCs, BRAF mutation, and MLH1 promoter methylation analyses. MMR status discordant cases were further analyzed, and MMR testing was performed on nodal metastases. Of 3671 patients, 107 (2.9%) had multiple CRCs (94 synchronous and 13 metachronous; total number of CRCs 220). Sixty CRCs were MMR deficient (dMMR) (27.3%), and most were right-sided and high-grade and showed special histologic features (P < .00001). Ninety-three patients showed intertumoral MMR concordance: 70 (65.4%) with MMR-proficient (pMMR) CRCs, and 23 (21.5%) were dMMR. Fourteen patients (13.1%) showed intertumoral MMR discordance (at least one dMMR and one pMMR), and in 5 patients, nodal metastases were present: 2 patients harbored metastases only from their pMMR cancer, 2 only from their dMMR cancer, and in 1 patient both pMMR and dMMR metastases were present. In conclusion, all multiple primary CRCs should be analyzed for MMR status as discordant MMR is possible as well as discordant metastatic nodal deposits, and this may be important for patient management.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for cancer: A paradigm shift in the treatment of resectable gastrointestinal cancer 3)A paradigm shift in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death-1, programmed cell death ligand-1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibodies, have been notably effective in various types of cancers. Mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability-high tumors have been established as striking biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. These biomarkers show a higher mutational burden, have cancer-associated neoantigens, and dense immune cell infiltration, which generates a robust immune response. For metastatic colorectal cancer, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, with or without ipilimumab, are recommended for chemotherapy-refractory patients, and pembrolizumab is recommended for chemotherapy-naive patients with mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability-high tumors. Conversely, patients with mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer showed no clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. Currently, combination therapy with anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibodies or a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with molecular targeting agents or radiotherapy have been investigated to modulate immune cells and enhance therapeutic efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed for neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In this review, we summarize the existing clinical data and discuss future perspectives with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments for colorectal cancer.

Endoscopic and imaging outcomes of PD-1 therapy in localised dMMR colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (IO) is emerging as a therapeutic option for patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) given high pathological response rates. The aim of the study was to characterise imaging and endoscopic response to IO.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with localised dMMR CRC that received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy was conducted. Endoscopy, imaging, and pathological outcomes were reviewed to determine response to treatment according to standardised criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients had received IO for the treatment of localised CRC (median eight cycles). Among evaluable cases (n = 31 for endoscopy and n = 34 for imaging), the best endoscopic response was complete response (CR) in 45% of cases, and the best radiographic response was CR in 23% of cases. Imaging CR rate after ≤4 cycles of IO (n = 1) was 6% compared to 44% after >4 IO cycles (n = 7). Among 28 patients with imaging and endoscopy available, a discrepancy in best response was noted in 15 (54%) cases. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months from IO start, 18 patients underwent surgical resection of which 11 (61%) had pathological CR (pCR). Despite pCR or no evidence of progression ≥6 months after completion of IO among non-operatively managed patients, 72% and 42% of patients had non-CR on imaging and endoscopy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies between imaging and endoscopy are prevalent, and irregularities identified on these modalities can be identified despite pathological remission. Improved clinical response criteria are warranted.

Concordance of microsatellite instability and mismatch repair status in paired biopsies and surgical specimens of resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: time for a call to action

BACKGROUND

Reliability of mismatch repair proteins and microsatellite instability assessment is essential in order to define treatment strategy and identify candidates to immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma. We evaluated the concordance of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status between endoscopic biopsies and surgical specimens.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma classified as MSI-H/dMMR by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) and operated at three referral Institutions were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of concordance between biopsy and surgical samples. If needed, central revision by IHC/PCR was performed by specialized pathologists from coordinating Institutions.

RESULTS

Thirteen (19.7%) out of 66 patients showed discordant MSI-H/dMMR results in the original pathology reports. In most cases (11, 16.7%) this was due to the diagnosis of proficient mismatch repair status on biopsies. Among the ten cases available for central review, four were due to sample issues, four were reclassified as dMMR, one case showed dMMR status but was classified as microsatellite stable by PCR, one was linked to misdiagnosis of endoscopic biopsy by the local pathologist. Heterogeneity of mismatch repair proteins staining was observed in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Available methods can lead to conflicting results in MSI-H/dMMR evaluation between endoscopic biopsies and surgical samples of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Strategies aiming to improve the reliability of assessment should be primarily focused on the optimization of tissue collection and management during endoscopy and adequate training of dedicated gastrointestinal pathologists within the multidisciplinary team.

Colonic medullary carcinoma: an exceedingly rare type of colorectal malignancy: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Medullary carcinoma of the colon is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer that has a unique, and sometimes varied, clinical and histologic profile. It usually presents in adult patients older than 50 years. Here, we report a unique case of young male patient who initially presented with abdominal pain followed by a large bowel obstruction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 40-year-old SriLankan male presented with right-sided abdominal pain and on examination, there was a palpable right iliac fossa mass. Colonoscopy and a computed tomography scan revealed cecal mass. Later, while waiting for elective resection, the patient developed symptoms and signs of a large bowel obstruction. He underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an uneventful postoperative course. The histopathologic evaluation of the resected specimens showed invasive carcinoma with syncytial growth pattern, foci of lymphoid host response, and dirty necrosis, in keeping with a medullary carcinoma pT4a pN2b. Unlike most reported medullary carcinoma cases, this patient was young and caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 positive.

CONCLUSION

We have reported another case of medullary carcinoma of the colon in a young patient with unique histologic characteristics. Reporting such cases helps in refine understanding of the histologic and genetic, as well as clinical, phenotypes of medullary carcinoma of the colon.

Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT imaging and clinicopathological characteristics analysis of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) can develop through various pathogenetic pathways, and one of the primary pathways is high microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). This study investigated the correlation between preoperative contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and clinicopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) according to different mismatch repair (MMR) statuses.

METHODS

From April 2021 to July 2022, a total of 281 CRC patients with preoperative CECT and available MMR status were enrolled from a single centre for this retrospective study. Preoperative CECT features and clinicopathologic characteristics were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analysis. A nomogram was established based on the multivariate logistic regression results. Preoperative and postoperative dynamic nomogram prediction models were established. The C-index, a calibration plot, and clinical applicability of the two models were evaluated, and internal validation was performed using three methods.

RESULTS

In total, 249 patients were enrolled in the proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group and 32 patients in the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group. In multivariate analysis, tumour location (right-hemi colon vs. left-hemi colon, odds ratio (OR) = 2.90, p = .036), the hypoattenuation-within-tumour ratio (HR) (HR > 2/3 vs. HR < 1/3, OR = 36.7, p < .001; HR 1/3-2/3 vs. HR < 1/3, OR = 6.05, p = .031), the number of lymph nodes with long diameter ≥ 8 mm on CECT (OR = 1.32, p = .01), CEA status (CEA positive vs. CEA negative, OR = 0.07, p = .002) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.45, p = .008) were independent risk factors for dMMR. Pre- and postoperative C-statistic were 0.861 and 0.908, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pre-operative CECT and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC correlates with MMR status, providing possible non-invasive MMR prediction. Particularly for dMMR CRC, tumour-draining lymph node status should be prudently evaluated by CECT.

Digging into phenotype change in mismatch repair deficient endometrial carcinoma and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition, a case report

•False negative cases for mismatch repair determination by immunohistochemistry may occur.•The mismatch repair phenotype in endometrial carcinoma impacts on therapeutic decision making.•Retesting for mismatch repair at relapse of endometrial carcinoma should be considered.

PREMM5 distinguishes sporadic from Lynch syndrome-associated MMR-deficient/MSI-high colorectal cancer

Current algorithms for diagnosing Lynch syndrome (LS) include multistep molecular tumor tests to distinguish LS-associated from sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), which add cost and complexity to the evaluation. We hypothesized that PREMM5, a clinical LS prediction tool, could be an alternative approach to screen for LS, thereby lessening the need for specialized molecular diagnostics. We reviewed a consecutively ascertained institutional cohort of 1058 CRC patients on whom pathologic and clinical data were available, including prior LS germline testing. Data from MMR-D/MSI-H CRC patients were reviewed and PREMM5 scores were calculated for each individual. Using a PREMM5 score cutoff ≥ 2.5% to characterize the need for germline testing, we determined the rate of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in LS genes in patients with PREMM5 scores ≥ 2.5% versus < 2.5%. Sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPV) of PREMM5 were calculated for all MMR-D/MSI-H CRC patients, and those with MLH1-deficient CRC. MMR IHC and/or MSI results were available on 572/1058 cases. We identified 74/572 (12.9%) cases as MMR-D/MSI-H, of which 28/74 (37.8%) harbored a LS PGV. 11/49 (22.4%) patients with MLH1-deficient CRC harbored a LS PGV. PREMM5 had 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.7-100 for any MMR-D/MSI-H; 95% CI: 71.5-100 for MLH1-deficient CRC) and 100% NPV (95% CI: 83.2-100 for any MMR-D/MSI-H; 95% CI: 82.4-100 for MLH1-deficient CRC) for identifying LS PGVs in these cohorts. PREMM5 accurately distinguishes LS- from non-LS-associated MMR-D/MSI-H CRC without additional somatic molecular testing. These findings are particularly relevant for limited-resource settings where advanced molecular diagnostics may be unavailable.

Dual-layer spectral-detector CT for predicting microsatellite instability status and prognosis in locally advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To construct and validate a prediction model based on dual-layer detector spectral CT (DLCT) and clinico-radiologic features to predict the microsatellite instability (MSI) status of gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the relationship between the prediction results and patient prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 264 GC patients who underwent preoperative DLCT examination were randomly allocated into the training set (n = 187) and validation set (n = 80). Clinico-radiologic features and DLCT parameters were used to build the clinical and DLCT model through multivariate logistic regression analysis. A combined DLCT parameter (CDLCT) was constructed to predict MSI. A combined prediction model was constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis by integrating the significant clinico-radiologic features and CDLCT. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to explore the prognostic significant of the prediction results of the combined model.

RESULTS

In this study, there were 70 (26.52%) MSI-high (MSI-H) GC patients. Tumor location and CT_N staging were independent risk factors for MSI-H. In the validation set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the clinical model and DLCT model for predicting MSI status was 0.721 and 0.837, respectively. The combined model achieved a high prediction efficacy in the validation set, with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.879, 78.95%, and 75.4%, respectively. Survival analysis demonstrated that the combined model could stratify GC patients according to recurrence-free survival (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

The combined model provides an efficient tool for predicting the MSI status of GC noninvasively and tumor recurrence risk stratification after surgery.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MSI is an important molecular subtype in gastric cancer (GC). But MSI can only be evaluated using biopsy or postoperative tumor tissues. Our study developed a combined model based on DLCT which could effectively predict MSI preoperatively. Our result also showed that the combined model could stratify patients according to recurrence-free survival. It may be valuable for clinicians in choosing appropriate treatment strategies to avoid tumor recurrence and predicting clinical prognosis in GC.

KEY POINTS

• Tumor location and CT_N staging were independent predictors for MSI-H in GC. • Quantitative DLCT parameters showed potential in predicting MSI status in GC. • The combined model integrating clinico-radiologic features and CDLCT could improve the predictive performance. • The prediction results could stratify the risk of tumor recurrence after surgery.

A radiomics model fusing clinical features to predict microsatellite status preoperatively in colorectal cancer liver metastasis

PURPOSE

To study the combined model of radiomic features and clinical features based on enhanced CT images for noninvasive evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) status in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) before surgery.

METHODS

The study included 104 patients retrospectively and collected CT images of patients. We adjusted the region of interest to increase the number of MSI-H images. Radiomic features were extracted from these CT images. The logistic models of simple clinical features, simple radiomic features, and radiomic features with clinical features were constructed from the original image data and the expanded data, respectively. The six models were evaluated in the validation set. A nomogram was made to conveniently show the probability of the patient having a high MSI (MSI-H).

RESULTS

The model including radiomic features and clinical features in the expanded data worked best in the validation group.

CONCLUSION

A logistic regression prediction model based on enhanced CT images combining clinical features and radiomic features after increasing the number of MSI-H images can effectively identify patients with CRLM with MSI-H and low-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-L), and provide effective guidance for clinical immunotherapy of CRLM patients with unknown MSI status.

Clinical and Genomic Factors Associated with Greater Tumor Mutational Burden in Prostate Cancer

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a biomarker that predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We currently lack a comprehensive understanding of how genomic and clinical factors correlate with TMB. We used a clinicogenomic database to assess independent predictors of TMB levels. The study included 2740 prostate cancer specimens from prostate gland (51.6%), lymph nodes (14.6%), and bone (10.4%). Androgen deprivation therapy use beyond 24 mo was weakly associated with high TMB (fold-change estimate [FCE] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.26; p = 0.009). In comparison to the prostate gland, metastases in the bladder (FCE 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.42; p = 0.029), liver (FCE 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.43; p < 0.001), and other locations (FCE 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.43; p < 0.001) were associated with high TMB. Microsatellite instability high (FCE 8.46, 95% CI 6.42-11.15; p < 0.001) and intermediate (FCE 1.77, 95% CI 1.46-2.14; p < 0.001) status were associated with greater TMB. Altered genes associated with greater TMB included MLH1 (FCE 1.81; p = 0.004), MSH2 (FCE 1.87; p < 0.001), MSH6 (FCE 1.92; p < 0.001), BRCA2 (FCE 1.69; p < 0.001), CDK12 (FCE 1.40; p < 0.001), MRE11 (FCE 2.28; p = 0.016), and PALB2 (FCE 2.08; p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates that TMB is relatively stable over lines of therapies and can be used to guide treatment at diagnosis or in later lines for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Patient summary

The number of genetic mutations in a tumor (tumor mutational burden, TMB) may help in predicting a patient's response to immunotherapy in advanced prostate cancer. We evaluated clinical and genetic factors that may affect TMB. We found that metastases in the bladder and liver are more likely to have high TMB than the primary tumor. Some individual genes are associated with high TMB. No prior treatment type was strongly associated with TMB, suggesting that TMB can be used to guide treatment at any time point.These data were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2023 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

Pathologic, immunologic, and clinical analysis of the microsatellite instability phenotype in endometrial carcinoma

The objective of this study was to determine if quantifying the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype could serve as a biomarker for clinical and immunologic features of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC). Patients with EC undergoing hysterectomy whose tumors demonstrated dMMR were included. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mismatch repair proteins and polymerase chain reaction analysis of NR27, BAT25, BAT26, NR24, and NR21 microsatellite loci were performed on each case. The MSI phenotype was quantified by subtracting the number of nucleotides of each microsatellite in tumor tissue from the corresponding microsatellite in paired normal tissue and summing the absolute differences. This was termed marker sum (MS) and is a novel quantification. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were identified by IHC for CD3, CD4, and CD8 and quantified with digital image analysis. Tumor infiltration of lymphocytes and clinical characteristics were stratified by MS. Four hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients with dMMR EC were analyzed. MS ranged from 1 to 32. Post hoc, 2 cohorts were defined using receiver operating characteristic curves (MS less than 13 and MS greater than 12). With the exception of tumor grade, all clinical and pathologic features, all tumor characteristics, and the numbers of TILs were similar between cohorts. The MSI phenotype is highly variable in dMMR EC, and no correlation between the immune profile and the severity of the MSI phenotype was observed.

[Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer]

In recent years, the treatment of colorectal carcinoma has experienced increasing individualization. In addition to RAS and BRAF mutational status that is firmly established in routine diagnostics, new therapeutic options evolved based on MSI and HER2 status as well as primary tumour localization. Offering the best targeted options in therapy requires new evidence-based decision-making algorithms regarding timing and scope of molecular pathological diagnostics in order for patients to receive an optimized therapy according to current treatment guidelines. New targeted therapies, some of which are about to be approved and for which pathology has to provide new molecular pathological biomarkers, will also play an increasingly important role in the future.

[Prognostic histological markers in colorectal cancer]

BACKGROUND

Colon carcinomas are among the most common malignant tumors worldwide. The critical evaluation of different therapy options is particularly relevant. On the one hand, colon carcinomas more often occur at an older age, on the other hand patients with colon carcinomas often live for decades after initial diagnosis - it is just as important to avoid overtreatment as it is to avoid undertreatment, which shortens the patient's life span. Prognostically effective biomarkers are decision-making tools. There are clinical, molecular, and histological prognostic markers-the latter are presented in this paper.

AIM OF THE WORK

To present the current state of knowledge on morphologically determinable prognostic markers in colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Literature search in PubMed and Medline.

CONCLUSIONS

In their daily work, pathologists identify highly relevant prognostic markers that are essential for therapeutic decisions. These markers must be communicated to the clinical colleague. The most important and longest-known prognostic markers are staging (TNM), including local resection status, lymph node involvement and number on the surgical specimen, vascular invasion, perineural sheath infiltration, and histomorphologic growth pattern determination (e.g., micropapillary colon carcinoma is associated with a very unfavorable prognosis). Recently, tumor budding has been added, which has practical applications especially in endoscopically applied pT1 carcinomas ("malignant polyps").

Mismatch Repair Screening of Gastrointestinal Cancers: The Impact on Lynch Syndrome Detection and Immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (MMR IHC) or microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is now routinely performed in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) to select those requiring Lynch syndrome testing. MMR IHC is also carried out on CRC and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers to select patients for immunotherapy. We review the Royal Marsden Hospital's pathway of molecular to germline testing for Lynch syndrome in the context of NICE guidance and the National Test Directory.

METHODS

We conducted (i) a retrospective audit of adherence to NICE guidance DG27 for patients diagnosed with CRC March 2017-August 2018 and (ii) a retrospective service evaluation of MMR IHC/Lynch syndrome testing in patients diagnosed with upper GI cancers January 2019-2020.

RESULTS

Of 394 patients with CRC, 346 (87.8%) had MMR IHC testing. Thirty-eight of 346 (10.9%) were MMR deficient (MMR-D) and 5 (1.4%) were found to have pathogenic germline variants causing Lynch syndrome. Of 405 patients with upper GI cancers, 221 (54.6%) had MMR IHC testing. Ten of 221 (4.5%) were MMR-D and 1 (0.5%) had a pathogenic germline variant causing Lynch syndrome.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the small but significant number of patients, with CRC or upper GI cancers, which were caused by Lynch syndrome. It also highlights weaknesses in our testing pathway that limit access to germline testing. As MMR testing increases, it is important that clinicians are aware that patients with MMR-D tumours require reflex somatic testing or referral for germline testing. We have incorporated the guidelines into a pathway for use in clinics and multidisciplinary teams.