Evaluation of pharmacists' role in preoperative medication review in a Veterans Affairs Health Care System

PURPOSE

Use of high-risk medications preoperatively may increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Available literature evaluating pharmacists' role in preoperative medication review is limited, and guidance is not currently available on which patients should have a medication review performed by a pharmacist before surgery. A preoperative rehabilitation pilot project in which clinical pharmacists reviewed medication profiles before scheduled surgeries was developed. This review aimed to evaluate pharmacists' role in reviewing medication profiles preoperatively and to identify specific patient factors that suggest a medication review is warranted.

METHODS

This retrospective review utilized the electronic medical records of nonfrail adults undergoing preplanned surgeries enrolled in the pilot project from August 2021 to April 2022. Endpoints were determined using descriptive statistics and regression models. A multivariate analysis was performed evaluating high-risk medications and VIONE (Vital, Important, Optional, Not indicated, and Every medication has an indication) polypharmacy risk score.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included, with at least one recommendation made in 83% of chart reviews. Many patients (95%) were taking at least one high-risk medication. Of the high-risk medication classes evaluated independently, only antiplatelets were predictive of pharmacy intervention (P = 0.01). Only high-risk medications were independently predictive of pharmacist intervention (P < 0.01) when multivariate analysis was performed.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists made a recommendation in the majority of medication reviews and were most likely to make a recommendation in patients taking high-risk medications. A larger sample size may provide more insight regarding patient-specific factors warranting a preoperative medication review.

Impact of an inpatient pharmacist-driven renal dosing policy on order verification time and patient safety

Research regarding pharmacist-driven renal dosing policies has focused on cost savings or prevention of adverse drug events. However, little is known about how these policies influence time from order signature to order verification or how this efficiency may reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes. Objectives: The primary endpoint compared time from prescriber electronic order signature to pharmacist electronic order verification between pre- and post-renal dosing policy implementation. The secondary endpoint evaluated electrocardiogram QTc prolongation attributed to fluconazole accumulation in renal impairment. Methods: This retrospective analysis included adults with a creatine clearance ⩽50 mL/min who received at least two inpatient doses from a 34-medication renal dosing protocol between January-February 2020 and April-May 2020. Results: 502 patients met eligibility for the primary outcome. The pre- and post-policy cohorts shared similar baseline characteristics. Time from order signature to verification was 9 and 8 min in the pre- and post-policy groups, respectively (p = 0.0861). In all, 56 patients met inclusion criteria for the secondary outcome. The QTc interval during fluconazole increased relative to baseline in 3 of 7 (43%) pre-policy and 4 of 5 (80%) post-policy. The QTc interval exceeded 500 ms in two patients, both in the post-policy cohort. Conclusions: There was no difference in order signature to verification time. Post-policy fluconazole renal adjustment did not reduce QTc prolongation.

The workload and satisfaction of pharmacists and pharmacy assistants after installation of an automated tablet dispensing and packaging system in a tertiary university hospital in Malaysia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of pharmacy automation on the workload and satisfaction of pharmacists and pharmacy assistants in an inpatient setting.

METHODS

This was an observational, cross-sectional survey using a convenience sampling method conducted at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) In-Patient Pharmacy. A validated online questionnaire assessed user satisfaction and task duration.

RESULTS

A total of 21 pharmacists and 18 pharmacy assistants participated in the survey. Most pharmacists (n = 17/21) were confident in the system, and both pharmacists and pharmacy assistants perceived it to be beneficial for patients (n = 33/39) and for reducing medication errors (n = 32/39). Pharmacy assistants spent approximately 5.34 hours on traditional work including filling medication orders (1.44 hours) after automated tablet dispensing and packaging system (ATDPS) implementation. Pharmacists spent 1.19 hours filling medication orders and 1.71 hours checking/verifying them, in contrast.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists focused mainly on clinical duties with healthcare colleagues, while pharmacy assistants handled various medication orders. Nevertheless, ATDPS reduced pharmacy staff workload in medication handling, achieving user satisfaction.

Collaborative Prescribing Practice in Managing Patients Post-Bariatric Surgery in a Tertiary Centre in Singapore

Background: A collaborative prescribing (CP) practice model, established by the endocrinologists, pharmacists, and advanced practice nurses, aims to provide for the postoperative monitoring and medical and nutritional management of stable patients after bariatric surgery. Method: Under the CP agreement, endocrinologists refer patients who have undergone bariatric surgery with stable medical conditions to CP practitioners, comprising senior pharmacists and advanced practice nurses. CP practitioners review the patient's weight loss progress, blood test results and vitals, the sufficiency of micronutrient repletion, adherence to supplements and medications, and chronic disease control. CP practitioners can prescribe and adjust the medications and supplements, in accordance with a clinical evaluation and standard guidance. Patients who require immediate attention due to complications or red flags are referred to the primary endocrinologist for further management. Results: From 5 May 2020 to 30 September 2023, CP practitioners provided 672 consultations. At least 68% and 80% of patients achieved appropriate weight loss post-surgery during the acute and maintenance phases, respectively. Less than 10% of the patients presented with anaemia and iron deficiency, and vitamin B12, folate and vitamin D deficiency. More than 80% of patients achieved a HbA1c of less than 7%. Conclusions: The CP practice framework provides a sustainable and viable model to facilitate optimal outcomes after bariatric surgery.

Expert consensus guidelines for community pharmacists in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with a combination of neurotropic B vitamins

This consensus guidance is for community pharmacists in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) management with a combination of neurotropic B vitamins. A multidisciplinary team including endocrinology, neurology, and pharmacy from Thailand discussed and aligned the practical scheme of DPN management in the community pharmacy setting, using the literature review and having face-to-face meeting. Five major statements have been endorsed as consensus recommendations for DPN care with strong acknowledgment. The aims of DPN management included reducing symptoms and the risk of complications, minimising adverse reactions from treatment regimens, and improving patients' knowledge and adherence to the treatment strategies. An initial screening process using a 7 items interview of Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire should be implemented to identify patients at risk of developing DPN. Subsequently, pharmacologic, and non-pharmacologic treatment should be employed based on patient-centered care. An interesting approach is combination of neurotropic B vitamins, which may be used as monotherapy or combination therapy to control DPN symptoms. The combined therapy potentially exhibits a synergistic effect and improves patient adherence. The consensus would be further considered in context of harmonisation of routine practice and country requirements.

Systematic literature review of the impact of psychiatric pharmacists

Introduction

Pharmacists focusing on psychotropic medication management and practicing across a wide variety of healthcare settings have significantly improved patient-level outcomes. The Systematic Literature Review Committee of the American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists was tasked with compiling a comprehensive database of primary literature highlighting the impact of psychiatric pharmacists on patient-level outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search of literature published from January 1, 1961, to December 31, 2022, was conducted using PubMed and search terms based on a prior American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists literature review. Publications describing patient-level outcome results associated with pharmacist provision of care in psychiatric/neurologic settings and/or in relation to psychotropic medications were included. The search excluded articles for which there was no pharmacist intervention, no psychiatric disorder treatment, no clinical outcomes, no original research, no access to full text, and/or no English-language version.

Results

A total of 4270 articles were reviewed via PubMed, with 4072 articles excluded based on title, abstract, and/or full text in the initial pass and 208 articles selected for inclusion. A secondary full-text review excluded 11 additional articles, and 5 excluded articles were ultimately included based on a secondary review, for a final total of 202 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. A comprehensive database of these articles was compiled, including details on their study designs and outcomes.

Discussion

The articles included in the final database had a wide range of heterogeneity. While the overall impact of psychiatric pharmacists was positive, the study variability highlights the need for future publications to have more consistent, standardized outcomes with stronger study designs.

Clinical impact and cost-saving analysis of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention in older patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Hospital admission and discharge are at high risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) in older patients with cancer. This study aimed to assess the clinical and economic impact of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention (RECAP) to optimize drug therapy in patients with cancer ≥75 years admitted to oncology or geriatric wards.

METHOD

RECAP intervention was defined as follows: at admission and discharge, hospital pharmacists conducted comprehensive medication reconciliation and review, identified relevant DRPs and provided optimization recommendations to prescribers; at discharge, pharmacists also provided patient education and shared information with primary care providers. The impact of the intervention was assessed by the rate of implementation of recommendations by the prescribers and the evolution of polypharmacy rate; a peer review of the clinical significance of DRPs was performed by an expert panel of geriatric oncologists and pharmacists. A cost saving analysis compared cost avoided through resolution of DRPs to cost of pharmacist's time.

RESULTS

From January 2019 and August 2020, 201 patients were included (median age 80 [75-97] years), 68.7% with solid tumors. DRPs requiring optimization were identified in 70.9% of patients at admission (mean 1.7 DRP/patient) and 47.7% at discharge (0.9 DRP/patient). Most pharmacist recommendations (70.8%) were followed by prescribers, allowing the correction of 1.2 DRP/patient at admission and 0.7 DRP/patient at discharge. Half of resolved DRPs were rated as clinically significant. However, polypharmacy rate was not reduced at discharge. Cost comparison showed $7.2 avoided for $1 invested, with an estimated total net benefit of $354,822 (mean $1766 per patient).

CONCLUSIONS

The RECAP model significantly reduces DRPs in hospitalized older patients with cancer. The model was cost saving, confirming the value of implementing it in routine practice.

A Survey of Pharmacists and Other Healthcare Professionals in Vietnam: Factors Influencing Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions

Background

Knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals are significant factors that affect the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). No previous research has examined the predictors of knowledge and attitudes toward ADR reporting in Vietnam.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the factors (ie, demographic and job-related characteristics) associated with inadequate knowledge and negative attitudes toward ADR reporting in a Vietnamese public hospital.

Methods

A survey recruited a cross-sectional sample of 511 healthcare professionals (with a response rate of 92.9%) at a public hospital in Vinh Long province, Vietnam, from December 2022 to February 2023, using a self-administered questionnaire. Factors related to knowledge and attitudes toward ADR reporting were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Pharmacists had significantly lower knowledge scores (mean = 5.86) than medical practitioners (7.24) and nurses (6.72). Additionally, pharmacists' attitudes scored significantly lower (34.61) than those of medical practitioners (37.21) and nurses (36.86). Multivariate logistic regression showed that educational level, healthcare profession, monthly on-call shifts, and number of direct patient interactions were factors associated with a lower level of knowledge regarding ADR reporting. Additionally, age group and healthcare profession were identified as factors associated with negative attitudes toward ADR reporting among healthcare workers.

Conclusions

Our study identified several factors associated with lower levels of knowledge and negative attitudes toward ADR reporting among healthcare workers in Vietnam. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and education programs to improve healthcare workers' knowledge and attitudes toward ADR reporting.

Demonstrating the Benefits of Antihypertensive Nighttime Dosing and Indapamide Usage in Hypertension Management

Background: Uncontrolled hypertension, specifically nocturnal hypertension, increases the risk for significant clinical outcomes. Evidence on the use of nighttime antihypertensives is scant and conflicting. In addition, hydrochlorothiazide continues to be the primary thiazide used despite being the least potent. Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate instituting nighttime dosing to control hypertension and compare the short-term effectiveness of blood pressure control with indapamide versus hydrochlorothiazide. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study. Participant inclusion criteria consisted of patients 18 years of age or older, a current diagnosis of hypertension, and hypertension that required medical therapy. The investigator documented whether a patient was taking at least one antihypertensive at night versus all morning medications, as well as the use of indapamide versus hydrochlorothiazide. The patient's baseline and first follow-up blood pressure readings were documented. The primary outcome was to determine whether including nighttime dosing in antihypertensive regimens is more effective than all morning antihypertensive regimens. The secondary outcome was to determine whether indapamide was more effective than hydrochlorothiazide. Results: A total of 64 patients were included in the study. Twenty-eight patients were taking >1 nighttime antihypertensives versus 32 patients on all morning medications. Patients on at least one nighttime medication demonstrated greater systolic blood pressure reduction. There was no difference in blood pressure reduction between indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide. Conclusion: The study findings support the use of nighttime dosing to improve blood pressure management. The results on the effectiveness of indapamide versus hydrochlorothiazide conflict with previous research.

UK Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA): The development, implementation and outcomes of a national online prescribing assessment

AIMS

The United Kingdom (UK) Prescribing Safety Assessment (PSA) is a 2-h online assessment of basic competence to prescribe and supervise the use of medicines. It has been undertaken by students and doctors in UK medical and foundation schools for the past decade. This study describes the academic characteristics and performance of the assessment; longitudinal performance of candidates and schools; stakeholder feedback; and surrogate markers of prescribing safety in UK healthcare practice.

METHODS

We reviewed the performance data generated by over 70 000 medical students and 3700 foundation doctors who have participated in the PSA since its inception in 2013. These data were supplemented by Likert scale and free text feedback from candidates and a variety of stakeholder groups. Further data on medication incidents, collected by national reporting systems and the regulatory body, are reported, with permission.

RESULTS

We demonstrate the feasibility, high quality and reliability of an online prescribing assessment, uniquely providing a measure of prescribing competence against a national standard. Over 90% of candidates pass the PSA on their first attempt, while a minority are identified for further training and assessment. The pass rate shows some variation between different institutions and between undergraduate and foundation cohorts. Most responders to a national survey agreed that the PSA is a useful instrument for assessing prescribing competence, and an independent review has recommended adding the PSA to the Medical Licensing Assessment. Surrogate markers suggest there has been improvement in prescribing safety in practice, temporally associated with the introduction of the PSA but other factors could be influential too.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSA is a practical and cost-effective way of delivering a reliable national assessment of prescribing competence that has educational impact and is supported by the majority of stakeholders. There is a need to develop national systems to identify and report prescribing errors and the harm they cause, enabling the impact of educational interventions to be measured.

How an Antimicrobial Stewardship Team Treated a Nocardia farcinica-Associated Brain Abscess: A Case Report

Nocardia species, which are ubiquitous in the environment, form lesions primarily in immunocompromised patients via oral or cutaneous infection. Some of these Nocardia species, such as N. farcinica, also infect the central nervous system via hematogenous dissemination, which rarely results in brain abscesses. Notably, N. farcinica is resistant to numerous antimicrobial drugs used in empirical therapy, necessitating the intervention of an infectious disease specialist. To date, no case of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) playing a central role in community hospitals without an infectious disease specialist has been reported. Here, we describe a case of N. farcinica-associated brain abscess in a small-to-medium-sized hospital with no infectious disease department or specialist, in which the AST assisted in the identification of the causative organism and in selecting appropriate therapeutic agents, ultimately leading to a cure. The patient was an 88-year-old man with a high fever. He had been taking prednisolone (10-15 mg/day) for approximately 1 year for pemphigoid. Considering the possibility of fever owing to bacteremia of cutaneous origin, ampicillin/sulbactam antimicrobial therapy at 6 g/day was initiated. A subsequent close examination led to the diagnosis of a brain abscess. Emergency abscess drainage was performed by a neurosurgeon, and postoperative antimicrobial combination therapy comprising ceftriaxone (4 g/day), vancomycin (2 g/day), and metronidazole (1,500 mg/day) was commenced. The AST suspected Nocardia infection earlier, but further testing was difficult to perform at this facility. Therefore, by requesting assistance from Nagoya University Hospital, we performed early bacterial identification by mass spectrometry and appropriate antimicrobial susceptibility testing by a custom panel on day 11. The patient was non-responsive to all the previously used antibiotics at the time of admission. On day 13 after admission, the patient was successfully treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and imipenem/cilastatin sodium, and the patient was cured. The AST can be as effective as an infectious disease specialist when a strong working relationship is established between the team and clinicians. Further, the activities of the AST can improve patient survival via active medical support in collaboration with attending physicians.

Assessment of long-term medication adherence with cystic fibrosis: An integrated approach

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that creates a multisystem pathology resulting in complex treatment regimens. In 2014, 43% of people with CF at an academic medical center experienced medication acquisition barriers. The creation of an integrated specialty pharmacy with an embedded CF team pharmacist was launched in 2016. In addition to filling specialty medications, this specialty pharmacy filled all patient medications through a service called total care pharmacy (TCP). This service was hypothesized to positively impact medication adherence.

METHODS

Adherence analysis was performed by utilizing the proportion of days covered (PDC). PDC was analyzed during years 1, 2, and 3 of therapy. PDC was calculated for medications with at least three fills during each year. Patients with PDC less than 80% were considered nonadherent and underwent manual chart review to identify a documented reason for nonadherence.

RESULTS

Patients in the first year of dornase alfa therapy had significantly higher adherence in the TCP cohort compared to non-TCP (81.3% PDC vs. 66.0%; p = .006), which was largely driven by adult patients (73.3% vs. 56.5% for pediatric). Analysis of other medications and groups did not yield statistically significant differences. Many patients who had been classified as nonadherent had valid clinical reasons that explained gaps in therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

When filling medications at a specialty pharmacy integrated within the academic medication center, dornase alfa adherence was higher in the TCP group. Further studies comparing TCP with services offered by pharmacies external to the health system would better characterize the impact of TCP services.

Clinical pharmacist intervention to ensure safe stimulant prescribing practices at a Veterans Affairs facility

Introduction

The Psychotropic Drug Safety Initiative (PDSI) is a national Veterans Affairs program that recommends obtaining cardiovascular vital signs semiannually and urine toxicology screening annually for veterans prescribed stimulants. The PDSI also recommends a risk review of concurrent central nervous system (CNS) depressants to ensure the benefits of coadministration with stimulants outweigh the risks. This project's purpose was to evaluate the occurrence of coprescriptions for CNS depressants and stimulants and encourage compliance with the PDSI recommendations to increase safe and appropriate management of veterans prescribed the combination. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of coprescriptions for CNS depressants and stimulants, evaluate compliance with stimulant monitoring recommendations, and measure the proportion of pharmacist recommendations implemented by the prescriber.

Methods

This quality improvement project identified veterans with an outpatient prescription for a stimulant and any coprescription(s) for benzodiazepines, sedative-hypnotics, and/or opioids. A pharmacy intervention note was generated to request a risk review, provide recommendations for de-escalation, and notify the stimulant prescriber of overdue monitoring parameters. Impact was measured 60 days after intervention. Descriptive statistics and a McNemar test were used to compare preintervention and postintervention data.

Results

From the 61 patients included, there were 67 unique prescriptions for benzodiazepines (49.3%), sedative-hypnotics (34.3%), and opioids (16.4%) in combination with a stimulant. Pharmacist intervention resulted in de-escalation of coprescribing for 9 patients (16.1%) and was associated with statistically significant improvement in compliance to stimulant monitoring recommendations.

Discussion

Clinical pharmacists can assist in ensuring safe and appropriate monitoring and management of veterans prescribed stimulants.

Pharmacists' Impact on Older Adults Transitioning To and From Patient Care Centers: A Scoping Review

Objective: Expand upon previous reviews conducted on transitions of care (TOC) services with a focus on pharmacist interventions for older adults specifically transitioning to and from long-term care, acute rehabilitation, residential care facilities, care homes, skilled nursing, or assisted living facilities, collectively termed patient care centers (PCC). Data Sources: A PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE search was conducted including citations between 1974 and July 14, 2022. Bibliographies were also reviewed for additional citations. Methods: Articles included described pharmacist interventions during TOC for patients transitioning to and from PCC, were written in English, and reported outcomes pertaining to TOC services. Of 873 citations reviewed, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: Most studies were prospective in design with small sample sizes, of limited duration, and with varying interventions and reported outcomes. Most explored the transition from hospital to PCC and included a pharmacist intervention involving the identification of medication errors and discrepancies during the TOC. Few studies reported cost savings or 30- and 60-day reductions in readmission rates or mortality. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed a lack of robust clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of specific interventions performed by pharmacists for patients transitioning to and from PCC. Of the available data, pharmacist involvement within an interprofessional team can be an effective intervention to resolve medication discrepancies, reduce readmissions, and medication-related adverse events. An opportunity exists for future studies to explore ways to improve outcomes during TOC within PCC.

Pharmacist-led rapid medication titration for hypertension management by telehealth: A quality improvement initiative

Hypertension guidelines recommend team-based care for the treatment of high blood pressure (BP). Clinical pharmacists can help patients get to goal BP with rapid medication titration in conjunction with telehealth visits. We conducted a pharmacist-led home BP monitoring pilot program from June 2020 to September 2021. Forty-two patients with a SBP ≥140 despite using ≤2 antihypertensive medications were referred for pharmacist telehealth with expedited medication titration to achieve a BP goal <130/80. The mean enrollment SBP/DBP was 155.2 (SD, 15.8)/89.7 (SD, 11.5) mm Hg, and the mean completion SBP/DBP was 132.1 (SD, 10.9)/77.6 (SD, 10). The number of hypertension medications prescribed increased from 1.3 to 1.6 with no instances of falls or hypotension. At completion, 31% of patients had an automated office blood pressure (AOBP) with SBP <130 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg. A pharmacist-led, home BP monitoring telehealth pilot program helped patients safely achieve BP goals.

Pharmacist-Driven Alcohol Use Disorder Screening May Increase Inpatient Utilization of Extended-Release Naltrexone: A Single Center Pilot Study

Individuals with mental illness have a high incidence of comorbid substance use, with one of the most prevalent being alcohol use disorder (AUD). Naltrexone, FDA-approved for AUD, decreases reward associated with alcohol-related social cues. This study aimed to determine if a pharmacist-driven screening tool would increase the use of extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in patients with AUD and a comorbid psychiatric condition. Pharmacists screened and recommended XR-NTX for adults admitted to the inpatient psychiatric unit, who had a DSM-5 diagnosis of AUD, a negative urine drug screen for opioids, and were hospitalized for at least 1 day. Endpoints evaluated included the number of XR-NTX doses administered during the screening period to the prescreening period, 30-day readmission rates, recommendation acceptance rates, and reasons for not administering XR-NTX. Pharmacists identified 66 of 641 screened patients who met the inclusion criteria and were candidates for XR-NTX. Compared to the preintervention period, more patients received XR-NTX for AUD (2 vs. 8). Readmission rates were similar between those with AUD who received XR-NTX and those who did not. Pharmacist-driven screening for AUD led to greater administration of XR-NTX when compared to the same 4-month period the year prior to initiating the study.

Pharmacotherapy in the heart transplant recipient: A primer for nurse clinicians and pharmacists

Heart transplantation (HT) is the definitive treatment for eligible patients with end-stage heart disease. A major complication of HT is allograft rejection which can lead to graft dysfunction and death. The guiding principle of chronic immunosuppression therapy is to prevent rejection of the transplanted organ while avoiding oversuppression of the immune system, which can cause opportunistic infections and malignancy. The purpose of this review is to describe immunosuppressive management of the HT recipient-including agent-specific pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, outcomes data, adverse effects, clinical considerations, and recent guideline updates. We will also provide recommendations for medical prophylaxis of immunosuppressed patients based on the most recent clinical guidelines. Additionally, we highlight the importance of medical therapy adherence and the effect of social determinants of health on the long-term management of HT. HT recipients are a complex and high-risk population. The objective of this review is to describe basic pharmacotherapy in HT and implications for nurses and pharmacists.

A pharmacist-driven deprescribing protocol for negative urine and sexually transmitted infection cultures in the emergency department increases antibiotic-free days

PURPOSE

Emergency department (ED) pharmacists commonly perform positive culture follow-ups that result in optimized antibiotic prescribing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential positive impact on the outcome of antibiotic-free days through an ED pharmacist-driven protocol to contact patients with negative urine cultures and sexually transmitted infection (STI) test results who were discharged with antibiotics.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, observational, pre-post intervention study to determine antibiotic use in patients with negative urine cultures who were discharged from the Loyola Medical University Center ED with antibiotics prescribed. Patients were identified through daily positive culture reports. The primary outcome was days free of antibiotics, defined as the number of calendar days within 28 days after urine culture or STI test collection on which the patient did not receive any antibiotic treatments.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two patients were screened. Sixty-three and twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria in the pre- and postintervention groups, respectively. The study identified 163/465 (35.1%) antibiotic free days for the preintervention group, compared to 150.5/187 (80.5%) antibiotic-free days for the postintervention group. A majority of the patients did not have urinary tract infection as the chief complaint. The most common urinary and STI symptoms upon ED admission in the pre- and postintervention groups were dysuria (19.2% vs 28.1%) and unusual discharge (30.8% vs 28.6%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that a pharmacist-driven protocol increased the number of antibiotic-free days for patients prescribed empiric antibiotic therapy and discharged from the ED with subsequent negative urine cultures and STI results. We propose taking a novel approach in discontinuation of antibiotics by implementing an expansion of ED culture programs to include negative cultures that promote antimicrobial stewardship.

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels in Pharmacists and Pharmacy Staff Following CoronaVac Vaccination

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the seropositivity rate of pharmacists and pharmacy staff after the administration of two doses of the CoronaVac-SinoVac vaccine and to assess changes in their antibody levels according to sociodemographic characteristics.

Materials and Methods

This descriptive study was conducted between June 04, 2021 and September 30, 2021 in pharmacies located in Istanbul, Türkiye. The results of self-initiated immunoglobulin (Ig) G testing of the pharmacists and pharmacy staff, conducted at diagnostic laboratories contracted by the Istanbul Chamber of Pharmacists, were obtained using an online data collection tool. IgG measurements taken from 15 days up to 120 days after the two vaccine doses were included in the study. Participants were asked whether they smoked, had any chronic diseases (hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, diabetes, etc.), or took any medications. Subgroup analyses were performed for each method used to measure antibody levels.

Results

The study included 329 pharmacists/pharmacy staff (298 pharmacists and 31 pharmacy staff). The mean age of the participants was 49.7 ± 13.7 years, and 71.4% were female. The antibody positivity of the 329 participants was 94.9% following the two doses. The positivity rate was 95.4% in participants under 65 years of age, whereas it was 91.8% in those aged 65 years and over. There was no significant difference in the mean age between those with positive and negative antibody results (p > 0.05). Although antibody levels were lower older people, smokers, and those with chronic diseases, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Seropositivity developed following the administration of two doses of CoronaVac-Sinovac vaccines. IgG antibody levels were lower in older adults, smokers, and those with chronic diseases, although not to a statistically significant extent. Further studies are needed to better understand the reasons for the different immunological responses to COVID-19.

Pharmacist's Impact on Medication Adherence and Drug-Related Problems in Patients with Epilepsy

Objectives

Drug-related problems (DRPs) and non-adherence are important barriers to ensuring optimal antiseizure drug treatment. The aim of this study was to improve medication adherence, detect and manage DRPs, and decrease the number of seizures with pharmacist-led education in patients with epilepsy.

Materials and Methods

A prospective and interventional study was conducted in collaboration with the Department of Neurology, the rational drug usage unit of a hospital pharmacy in a university hospital. The impact of pharmacist-led education on medication adherence and interventions in the management of DRPs was assessed in patients with epilepsy who were admitted to the outpatient clinic. A total of 39 patients with epilepsy were evaluated in terms of medication adherence, DRPs, and seizure control over a 2-month follow-up period and patient satisfaction with pharmacy services at the end of the study.

Results

A total of 59 DRPs were detected, and 71.2% of them were accepted and implemented both by physicians and/or patients. Pharmacist interventions solved 62.7% of DRPs. The number of patients with high-level medication adherence significantly increased from 17 to 28 after pharmacist-led education (p < 0.001). The number of seizures decreased in 19 patients (48.7%) during the 2-month period. Patient satisfaction was high in all patients.

Conclusion

It is shown that the contribution of pharmacists in treating patients with epilepsy is beneficial in improving medication adherence, detection and management of DRPs, and decreasing the number of seizures.

Telepharmacy Implementation to Support Pharmaceutical Care Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

Background

Telepharmacy was effectively applied for remote pharmaceutical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives

To determine the implementation of telepharmacy services to support pharmacists in providing pharmaceutical care during the pandemic.

Data Sources

Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2021: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica database (Embase), Web of Science, Proquest, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Study Selection and Data Extraction

The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with the PROSPERO registry of systematic reviews. Reports of original research investigating the implementation of telepharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved. Researchers screened the title and abstract of each article, and then evaluated the full text of eligible articles to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. Pharmacists' responsibilities and actions were classified in relation to the International Pharmaceutical Federation guideline for managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Extracted data included study characteristics, pharmacists' interventions delivered through a telepharmacy system, and the benefits of telepharmacy implementation.

Data Synthesis

The database search yielded 1400 articles. After removal of duplicates and articles not meeting the specific inclusion criteria (n = 1381), a total of 19 relevant original research articles were reviewed. According to these studies, telepharmacy was used to perform remote medication review and optimization, assess medication adherence, dispense and deliver medications, educate and counsel patients, promote disease prevention, collaborate with health care providers, and monitor treatment outcomes.

Conclusions

This study highlighted the use of telepharmacy services to support pharmacists' activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Randomized clinical trials are needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telepharmacy services.

Role of Community Pharmacist in Asthma Management: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice

Purpose

To investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice of asthma management counseling and the perceived barriers by community pharmacists.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 416 community pharmacists using an online-based questionnaire. The questionnaire included five parts that assessed socio-demographics and medical references used to seek drug-related information, pharmacists' knowledge (7 items), attitudes (5 items), practice (22 items) and the barriers for the provision of asthma management counseling (10 items). Binary logistic regression was conducted to find the variables that were significantly and independently associated with knowledge, attitude and asthma management counseling practice.

Results

Increased years of experience was associated with decreased knowledge (OR = 0.918, 95% Cl (0.869:0.970), P = 0.002) and less positive attitude toward asthma management (OR = 0.876, 95% Cl. (0.821:0.935), P < 0.001), while working in independent community pharmacy (OR = 2.097, 95% Cl. (1.273:3.454), P = 0.004) and increased awareness of asthma management guidelines (OR = 1.60, 95% CI. (1.044:2.453), P = 0.031) increased the odds of being in the high knowledge group. In contrast, increasing the daily number of pharmacy visitors OR = 1.009, 95% Cl. (1.001:1.016), P = 0.024) and having a pharmacy degree (OR = 2.330, 95% Cl. (1.256:4.326), P = 0.007) increased the odds of having a positive attitude. Male pharmacists (OR = 0.553, 95% Cl. (0.350:0.873), P = 0.011) and having bachelor in pharmacy (OR = 0.354, 95% Cl. (0.179:0.700), P = 0.003) decreased the odds of being in the high practice group. On the other hand, increased awareness of asthma management guidelines tripled the odds of being in the high practice group (OR = 3.067, 95% Cl. (1.964:4.787), P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The current study findings offer valuable insights into the gaps in knowledge, attitude, and practice of asthma management counseling among community pharmacists, as well as the barriers and factors that impede the provision of these services. These insights serve as a guide for developing future strategies aimed at enhancing the role of pharmacists in asthma care.

Clinical pharmacists' interventions for preventing adverse events in critically ill neonates in Qatar: an economic impact analysis

Objective

This study aimed to assess the overall economic impact of clinical pharmacist interventions in the neonatal ICU (NICU) in Qatar.

Methods

A retrospective review of neonates' records was performed over a 3-month duration in the NICU of Qatar to determine the total economic benefit of clinical pharmacist interventions. The total benefit of interventions was calculated by considering the cost avoidance due to preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) and the cost savings associated with the revised resource use due to interventions. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness and generalizability of the results.

Results

A total of 513 interventions were analyzed, involving 150 neonates. Most of the drug-related problems were related to therapy dosing, followed by drug choice appropriateness, the addition of prophylactic treatment, and administration frequency. The overall annual benefit was estimated at QAR 4,178,352 (1,147,584), which consisted of cost avoidance of QAR 1,050,680 (USD 288,648) and an overall cost saving of QAR -6091 (USD -1673).

Conclusions

While the clinical pharmacist interventions led to increased resource utilisation and associated costs, when considering the avoided costs of ADEs, the overall clinical pharmacist practices in the NICU setting were economically beneficial.

Knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward pharmacogenomics among pharmacists and pharmacy students: A systematic review

Background and Aims

Pharmacists have been recognized as one of the most qualified healthcare professionals in the clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics, yet its widespread implementation in clinical pharmacy practice has remained limited. The review aims to systematically investigate knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward pharmacogenomics among pharmacists and pharmacy students to inform the future delivery of pharmacogenomics education programs.

Methods

PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched up to May 17, 2022. Studies were selected if they included data on pharmacists' or pharmacy students' knowledge, perception, or attitude about pharmacogenomics and were published in a peer-reviewed, English-language journal with full-text availability. Any published study not deemed original research was excluded. All included studies were critically appraised using the Center for Evidence-Based Management's critical appraisal tools. The data were descriptively analyzed and presented based on pharmacists' and pharmacy students' knowledge/awareness, perception/attitudes toward pharmacogenomic (PGx), confidence in using or interpreting PGx testing results, and their desire to get further PGx education or their most preferred method of further education.

Results

A combined total of 12,430 pharmacists and pharmacy students from 26 countries are represented in the 52 included studies. Despite overwhelmingly positive attitudes and perceptions toward pharmacogenomics among pharmacists and pharmacy students, an overall lack of adequate knowledge and confidence was found. The review also found a strong desire for further pharmacogenomics education among pharmacists and pharmacy students.

Conclusion

Pharmacists and pharmacy students have positive perceptions and attitudes toward pharmacogenomics, which is hindered by a lack of knowledge and confidence. However, inadequate control for confounders, limited representativeness of the studied population or region, and small sample sizes diminish the generalizability of the review results. Knowledge and confidence could be improved through enhanced delivery of pharmacogenomic courses within the pharmacy curriculum and continuing education programs.

[Evaluation of Pharmacists' Active Intervention to Reduce Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Special Older Adult Nursing Home]

Currently, elderly care facilities that do not offer long-term care are not required to employ pharmacists, and duties such as the dispensing and distribution of medicines are entrusted to external pharmacies. Pharmacists seldom spend sufficient time at the facilities for elderly people requiring special care. Thus, in many cases, the pharmacists have insufficient knowledge of the residents' medication status, leading to their inability in determining whether the residents are receiving a suitable drug therapy. We previously documented various problems in the practices adopted by nursing staff (with negligible intervention by pharmacists) for assisting residents in taking their medications. In the present pilot study, we attempted to eliminate the use of potentially inappropriate medications by stationing a pharmacist at a nursing home for 24 h every week (3 d/week). We proactively collected information from nurses and other nursing staff and observed the residents' actual living conditions and medication use. As a result of this intervention, 56 prescriptions were changed. However, only two of these were changed exclusively based on the prescription information. Most prescriptions were able to change based on the information obtained by the pharmacist present at the facility. Therefore, pharmacists' presence at the facility (at least for a few hours) is necessary, as they can actively intervene and collaborate with other staff to prevent the use of potentially inappropriate medications.