Recombinant versus plasma-derived factor VIII products and the development of inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study

It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.

Treatment-related risk factors of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study

The CANAL Study (Concerted Action on Neutralizing Antibodies in severe hemophilia A) was designed to describe the relationship between treatment characteristics and inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This multicenter retrospective cohort study investigated 366 consecutive patients born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers combined with a decreased recovery. Eighty-seven (24%) patients developed inhibitors (69 high titer [19%]). The incidence of inhibitors appeared to be associated with age at first treatment, decreasing from 41% for those treated within the first month of age to 18% in those treated after 18 months; after adjustment for treatment intensity, this association largely disappeared. Surgical procedures and peak treatment moments at start of treatment increased inhibitor risk (relative risk [RR], 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-7.1; and RR, 3.3; CI, 2.1-5.3, respectively). Regular prophylaxis was associated with a 60% lower risk than on-demand treatment (RR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.8). Our findings suggest that the previously reported associated between an early age at first exposure and the risk of inhibitor development is largely explained by early, intensive treatment. The latter appears to be an independent risk factor for inhibitor development. In addition, early, regular prophylaxis may protect patients with hemophilia against the development of inhibitors.

Immune response against therapeutic factor VIII in hemophilia A patients—A survey of probable risk factors

A number of diseases are treated by passive administration of human proteins. Human coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is one such protein which is administered to hemophilia A patients in order to manage and treat hemorrhagic incidences. This mode of therapy suffers from the side effect of generating anti-FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) which neutralizes the function of the infused FVIII. At a time when efficient viral screening procedures are at place, development of inhibitors poses the greatest threat to such a therapy. Various predisposing factors, both patient and product-related, are responsible for the development of inhibitory antibodies. A proper understanding of these "risk-factors" would eventually help to better design therapeutic regimen to tackle hemophilia A.

Bad blood

An inquiry has begun into the infection of thousands of people with haemophilia in the United Kingdom who contracted hepatitis and HIV in the 1970s and 1980s. Rebecca Coombes brings the story up to date

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of recombinant factor VIII (REFACTO�) in patients with haemophilia A: interim data from a postmarketing surveillance study in Germany and Austria

An open-label, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance study conducted in Germany and Austria with recombinant factor VIII (REFACTO) has enrolled 217 patients (mean age 26.3 years) from 38 haemophilia centres during the first 4.8 years. Most patients (188/217; 86.6%) had severe to moderately severe haemophilia A, of whom 153 completed sufficient diary information for the main efficacy analysis. These 153 patients experienced a median of 6.6 (interquartile range 1.4-18.6) bleeding episodes per year. Patients treated with prophylaxis experienced a median of 4.4 (1.1-9.3) bleeds per year, while patients treated on-demand experienced a median of 22.8 (11.3-29.0) bleeds per year. Overall, most physicians (41/43 [95.3%]) were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with the efficacy of REFACTO in the treatment of bleeding episodes. A total of 137 non-serious adverse events have been reported in 52/217 patients (24.0%) to date. In addition, 129 serious adverse events in 87 patients (40%) were reported, including 41 cases of 'less than expected therapeutic effect' (LETE). Of these, 39 LETE cases were reported in one centre; however, patients in this centre experienced considerably fewer bleeding episodes per year than patients outside this centre. Overall, six patients (2.8%) have developed de novo inhibitors, three of which were considered high titre. Four of these patients were at high risk (0-50 exposure days [ED]) of inhibitor formation, one was at intermediate risk (51-100 ED) and one was at low risk (>100 ED). These results emphasize the benefit of postmarketing surveillance and, overall, this study confirms the efficacy, safety and tolerability of REFACTO in the treatment of patients with haemophilia A.

IgE-mediated anaphylactic reaction to purified and recombinant factor VIII in a patient with severe haemophilia A

We report a 51-year-old patient with severe haemophilia A developing a severe life-threatening anaphylactic reaction to recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII). Anaphylactic reactions are a rare but well-known side effect of FVIII products. The nature of these reactions could not be clarified as previous studies failed to demonstrate a specific IgE response. Here, we could prove a grade 3 anaphlyactic reaction as an IgE-mediated response to rFVIII for the first time by Western blotting.

Human Plasma von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII Complex (Haemate?? P/Humate-P??)

Haemate P/Humate-P is a pasteurised human plasma-derived concentrate containing coagulation factor VIII and a near-normal spectrum of von Willebrand factor multimers, including high-molecular weight multimers, for intravenous use in patients with von Willebrand disease or haemophilia A. Extensive clinical experience over the past 25 years has shown that Haemate P/Humate-P provides effective haemostatic control for the prevention and treatment of bleeds in patients with these conditions, with no confirmed cases of viral or prion transmission occurring during this time. In small prospective and retrospective noncomparative studies, Haemate P/Humate-P provided effective haemostatic control for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in the vast majority of paediatric and adult patients with von Willebrand disease. Haemate P/Humate-P was generally well tolerated in patients with von Willebrand disease or haemophilia A.

Prolonged bleeding-free period following prophylactic infusion of recombinant factor VIII reconstituted with pegylated liposomes

Prophylactic treatment for hemophilia A involves infusion of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates every 2 to 3 days. Liposomes can be efficacious vehicles for medicines, and surface modification by PEGylation can prolong liposome circulation time. When reconstituted with PEGylated liposomes (PEGLip's), recombinant FVIII binds noncovalently but with high affinity to the external liposome surface. This preparation showed prolongation of FVIII half-life and increased protection from bleeding in preclinical models. Here we report a blinded, controlled, crossover, multicenter clinical study that evaluated the time free from bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A during prophylaxis with standard rFVIII (no liposomes) or PEGLip rFVIII (PEGLip reconstituted) at 25 and 35 IU/kg doses. Of 24 enrolled patients, 23 were eligible for efficacy analysis. Mean number of days without bleeds was 7.2 ± 1.7 with standard rFVIII compared with 13.3 ± 4.8 with PEGLip rFVIII at the 35 IU/kg dose and 5.9 ± 1.7 with standard rFVIII versus 10.9 ± 2.9 with PEGLip rFVIII at the 25 IU/kg dose (P < .05 between treatment groups for each dose). PEGLip rFVIII was well tolerated. These data suggest that reconstitution of rFVIII with PEGLip's may reduce the frequency of treatment during prophylaxis.

Should hemophilia treaters switch to albumin-free recombinant factor VIII concentrates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the albumin-free recombinant factor VIII concentrates in the treatment of hemophilia A.

RECENT FINDINGS

The third-generation recombinant factor VIII product Advate has been found to be safe and effective in treating bleeding associated with hemophilia A.

SUMMARY

Multiple issues must be considered when selecting a factor VIII concentrate for patients with hemophilia A including efficacy, availability, risk of transmission of infectious agents, risk of inhibitor development and cost. Third-generation recombinant factor VIII concentrates have been shown to be safe and effective. A theoretical improvement in risk of infectious agent transmission has been achieved by production of the products without human or animal plasma proteins. Controversy exists, however, with regard to a higher risk of inhibitor development with recombinant products. The higher cost of Advate can also potentially play a role in product choice. Overall every patient and their family must be presented with the advantages and disadvantages of all factor VIII concentrates, and be allowed to make an informed decision about which product to use for treatment.

Blood safety and the choice of anti-hemophilic factor concentrate

Hemophilia is a congenital disorder due to the deficiency of the activity of factor VIII (classical hemophilia A) or IX (Christmas disease or hemophilia B). Bleeding is common and may result in long-term complications or even death. Bleeding may be treated or prevented by infusion of factor concentrates however these drugs are not without risk. Clinicians often feel ill prepared to provide accurate and impartial information regarding these drugs. This review will provide the reader with an historical yet up to date perspective on blood safety as it relates to the choice of concentrates to treat hemophilia.

Clinical Evaluation of Recombinant Factor VIII Preparation (Kogenate) in Previously Treated Patients with Hemophilia A: Descriptive Meta-Analysis of Post-Marketing Study Data

The safety and efficacy of Kogenate, a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) preparation for the treatment of bleeding episodes, were studied in a 123-patient meta-analysis population of previously treated patients (PTPs), including 15 enrolled in the registration Phase III trial (PTP-I group), 93 from the post-marketing special investigation (PTP-II group), and 15 from short-term special investigations in surgery or tooth extraction (SI group). These patients (82 severe, 31 moderate, 9 mild, and 1 unknown), aged 11 months to 72 years, were enrolled in 28 centers in Japan. Blood samples taken at the baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the introduction of Kogenate were evaluated for FVIII inhibitor antibodies, antibodies formed against trace proteins derived from the rFVIII production process, and for general changes in laboratory test results. Mean exposure to Kogenate was 1103 days in PTP-I, 86 days in PTP-II, 27 days in patients in surgery, and 2 days in patients with tooth extraction. Assessment of FVIII inhibitor activity was conducted in 115 of the 123 patients by means of the Bethesda assay. Twelve patients were found to have a low titer of FVIII inhibitor (0.5-3.0 BU/mL) prior to any administration of Kogenate, and 103 were inhibitor-negative at the baseline. Among this latter group, 3 patients (2.9%) tested inhibitor-positive, with titers ranging from 1.2 to 2.1 BU/mL, with 4 patients below 1.0 BU/mL. One patient in the 11 PTPs investigated (PTP-I) developed antibodies against baby hamster kidney protein and mouse immunoglobulin G, but these findings were transient and asymptomatic. Hemostasis was achieved (markedly effective or effective) in 3666 of the 3855 bleeding episodes (95.1%) observed in 108 patients. Only 1 infusion was necessary in 3790 (98.3%) of these episodes. These data indicate that Kogenate is safe and very effective for the treatment of bleeding in PTPs with hemophilia A.

Life-threatening sepsis caused by Burkholderia cepacia from contaminated intravenous flush solutions prepared by a compounding pharmacy in another state

We report 2 life-threatening cases of Burkholderia cepacia sepsis caused by infusate contamination during compounding. Bacterial isolates from the patients' blood cultures and the infusate were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Proper quality controls at a local and national level are important for ensuring safe delivery of compounded medications to patients in all settings, including those outside health care facilities.

Continuous infusion of factor concentrates in children with haemophilia A in comparison with bolus injections

Although the concept of continuous infusion (CI) of factor concentrates is well known, prospective paediatric data are rare. We present a prospective open-labelled non-randomized study focusing on safety, efficacy and factor VIII (FVIII) usage compared with bolus injections (BI) in children. In 43 consecutive patients (0.5-17 years; median: 9.6) undergoing different operations, CI was started with an initial FVIII-bolus of 70 IU kg(-1) bodyweight, followed by a median infusion rate of 4.4 IU kg(-1) h(-1) (range: 2.8-9.5) dose adjusted for daily FVIII levels (target: 60-80%). No direct serious adverse events occurred; however, two out of 43 patients, both from the group of four patients with less than 20 exposure days (ED) before starting CI, developed a high-responding inhibitor. Two CI patients showed mild thrombophlebitis or rash. Infusion rates needed to achieve adequate FVIII levels were highly predictable and could be reduced because of decreasing FVIII clearance. Bleeding, requiring additional boli, was observed in eight out of 43 patients. Therapy duration and factor usage of CI were influenced by the procedure, but not by the product used or thrombophilia. Twelve of these CI patients were compared with 12 contemporary consecutive age- and procedure-matched BI patients. Compared with BI patients, CI patients saved 30% FVIII (812.9 vs. 563.2 IU kg(-1), P < 0.006). We conclude that CI forms a safe and effective method for perioperative care in children and reduces factor usage. Because of the unknown risk of inhibitor development, we will use CI only in patients beyond 20 ED.

Influence of the type of factor VIII concentrate on the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A

Inhibitor development is the major treatment complication in children with severe hemophilia A. It is not clear whether the risk of inhibitors is higher with recombinant factor VIII or with plasma-derived factor VIII. We used multivariate analysis to compare 2 cohorts of previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A: 62 patients treated with the same brand of high-purity plasma-derived FVIII (pFVIII) containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) and 86 patients treated with full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII). In addition to the usual end points (all inhibitors, high inhibitors), we also examined a third end point (high inhibitors and/or immune tolerance induction). The risk of inhibitor development was higher in patients treated with rFVIII than in patients treated with pFVIII, regardless of other risk factors (F8 genotype; nonwhite origin; history of inhibitors in patients with a family history of hemophilia; age at first FVIII infusion). The adjusted relative risk (RRa) for inhibitor development with rFVIII versus pFVIII was 2.4 (all inhibitors), 2.6 (high inhibitors), and 3.2 (high inhibitors and/or immune tolerance induction), respectively, depending on the end point (above). The pathophysiology of this large effect must be understood in order to improve the characteristics of recombinant products and to reduce the incidence of inhibitors to FVIII.

The Role of Immunomodulation in the Management of Factor VIII Inhibitors

Approximately 25% of persons with hemophilia A will have their treatment complicated by the development of anti-FVIII inhibitory antibodies. This adverse event requires the use of alternative hemostatic agents to treat bleeding and the consideration of a protocol to generate immunological tolerance to FVIII. The pathogenetic factors contributing to FVIII inhibitor generation include both patient- and concentrate-related characteristics. The FVIII genotype contributes to this risk as do other, less well defined, immunogenetic factors. The role of the type of FVIII concentrate as a precipitant for inhibitor generation appears to be less influential. Immunomodulatory management of FVIII inhibitors requires sustained and repeated exposure to FVIII through a variety of intravenous immune tolerance induction (ITI) protocols. Certain pre-ITI characteristics predict for the likelihood of success, most especially the pre-ITI anti-FVIII inhibitor titer. Currently, two major areas of debate remain unresolved with relation to the optimal form of ITI schedule. The best FVIII dose to generate FVIII tolerance is under investigation in an international prospective trial, while the issue of whether von Willebrand factor–containing concentrates may provide more powerful tolerizing effects remains open for further discussion. With a variety of ITI protocols, success rates of approximately 80% have been achieved with good-risk patients. In those that fail initial attempts at ITI, additional treatments using agents such rituximab are now being explored with further evidence of success in 60–80% of these salvage patients. Finally, several pre-clinical studies of innovative approaches to achieving FVIII tolerance suggest that combinations of immunomodulatory therapy may be of benefit in the future.

Differences between patients', physicians' and pharmacists' preferences for treatment products in haemophilia: a discrete choice experiment

The provision of health care to patients with haemophilia through replacement of the deficient coagulation factor is the result of a complex interaction between patients, physicians and policy makers, each carrying their individual sets of preferences. Preferences of patients, physicians and pharmacists towards perceived viral safety, risk of inhibitor development, infusion frequency during prophylaxis, pharmaceutical dosage form, distribution modes and price were evaluated by conjoint analysis, using a discrete choice experiment. Overall 178 patients', 69 physicians and 58 pharmacists completed the study. Patients, physicians and pharmacists displayed preferences: (i) similar in direction and strength for risk of inhibitors and frequency of prophylaxis, (ii) similar in direction, but not in strength for perceived viral safety and price, with patients showing lower strength compared with physicians and pharmacists, and (iii) dissimilar in direction and/or strength for: (i) dosage form, which tested important only for pharmacists and (ii) distribution mode, which tested important for patients and physicians only. Our study provides evidence of the differences between different stakeholders in the preferences towards haemophilia replacement therapy, indicating that different opinions should be taken into account when planning optimal care.

A postmarketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of ReFactoR (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with haemophilia A

This clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of ReFacto (St Louis-derived active substance) in patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A over a period of 6 months or 50 exposure days (EDs), whichever occurred first. Sixty patients, 58 previously treated and two previously untreated, were enrolled into this study. This was an open-label, multicentre, postmarketing surveillance study in which patients received prophylaxis or on-demand treatment as determined by their doctor. Surgical prophylaxis was evaluated in seven patients requiring elective surgery. Thirty-two patients aged <1 to 66 years (median 19.5) received prophylaxis and 28 patients, aged 1-71 years (median 33.5), received on-demand treatment. The majority of patients had severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 2%): 84.4% in the prophylaxis group and 85.7% in the on-demand group. Prophylaxis with ReFacto was associated with a median of 6.7 bleeds per year (range: 0-37). The investigator's assessment of final outcome for prophylactic treatment was excellent or effective for 93.1% of patients. ReFacto resolved 92.8% of bleeds with one or two infusions. The investigator's assessment was excellent or good for 98.2% of bleeds treated with ReFacto. Haemostasis was achieved for all seven surgical cases and ReFacto gave an excellent or good response for each. The nature and incidence of adverse events was as expected and no new safety concerns emerged. One previously treated patient (PTP) developed a high-titre inhibitor (maximum 75 BU) and one minimally treated patient (MTP) developed a low-titre inhibitor while on the study but eventually achieved high titres (maximum 30 BU) after immune tolerance therapy was initiated with a plasma-derived FVIII product. One previously untreated patient (PUP) developed a transient low-titre inhibitor (0.4 BU). Other serious adverse events (SAEs) were unrelated to study treatment. There were no allergic events. The results of this study are consistent with the previously published ReFacto pivotal studies.

Environmental risk factors for inhibitor development in children with haemophilia A: a case-control study

This case-control study investigated the interactions between genetic and environmental factors and inhibitor development in 108 children with haemophilia A exclusively treated with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). Sixty patients with inhibitors were compared with 48 inhibitor-free controls. Family history of inhibitors and null mutations in the FVIII gene were more prevalent in cases than in controls (20% vs. 2%, P = 0.001 and 83% vs. 64%, P = 0.04, respectively). On the other hand, there was no difference between cases and controls for such putative risk factors of inhibitor development as amniocentesis/villocentesis, premature/caesarean birth, breast-feeding, treatment during infections/vaccinations, surgical procedures and central nervous system bleeding. A trend was found for an increased risk of inhibitor development in children first treated at a young age (<11 months); however, this was not confirmed after adjusting for genetic factors. The implementation of prophylaxis was evaluated as a putative risk factor in a subgroup of 25 cases: seven who started prophylaxis prior to inhibitor development and 18 potentially eligible for prophylaxis because they were inhibitor-free up to the age of 35 months (i.e. the upper limit of the age range at prophylaxis onset in cases and the median age at prophylaxis onset in controls). Patients who started prophylaxis had a lower inhibitor risk than those treated on demand (adjusted odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.9). The protective effect on inhibitor development shown by prophylaxis may represent an additional advantage prompting its use in haemophilic children.

Inhibitor Development in Patients with Hemophilia A after Continuous Infusion of FVIII Concentrates

Continuous infusion (CI) of coagulation factor concentrates has been used since the early 1990s. Recent reports of the occurrence of an inhibitor after CI have raised concerns about this method of treatment. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the development of inhibitors after CI of Factor VIII concentrates in Germany. So far, 13 hemophilia centers have been contacted, and data have been collected by a questionnaire. Of the 13 centers, CI had never been performed in three, no inhibitors had been detected in five, and inhibitor development after CI was recorded in 10 patients in the remaining five centers. Of these 10 patients (ages 7 months to 57 years), five were suffering from severe, one from moderate, and four from mild hemophilia. Indications for treatment were major bleeds and surgical procedures. Plasma-derived (6 cases) and recombinant (4 cases) factor concentrates were given in various infusion sets. Data concerning amount infused (4300 to > 100,000 IU), number of days of exposure to factor concentrates (1 to > 100), and inhibitor characteristics (alloantibodies, 3 LR, 7 HR) were collected. Regarding hemophilia genotype, we found missense mutations in four patients, intron-22 inversions in two, and one small deletion in one; the genotype in three was unknown. In conclusion, only 3 out of 10 patients who developed an inhibitor after CI showed the typical risk profile for inhibitor formation, which is severe hemophilia A with a severe gene defect and less than 50 days of exposure to coagulation factor concentrates. Especially striking was the finding that 50% of the patients who developed inhibitors had mild to moderate hemophilia A. Our data point to the existence of a so-far unknown factor, related to CI, that might lead to inhibitor formation.

Thrombosis in a pregnant hemophilia A carrier after intrapartum recombinant factor VIII

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic hemophilia A is a rare disorder in females. Pregnancy and delivery in such women can be life threatening. Obstetric management is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure a good outcome.

CASE

A woman with hemophilia A delivered by cesarean developed a deep vein thrombosis 10 days postpartum after recombinant factor VIII administration.

CONCLUSION

Hemophilia A due to skewed X-inactivation is a rare cause of peripartum bleeding. Recombinant factor VIII administration can prevent hemorrhage during and after cesarean delivery but may be associated with development of deep vein thrombosis.

Role of von Willebrand factor in immune tolerance induction

Patients with hemophilia who develop inhibitors present a particular challenge in therapeutic management. Although such patients are at high risk for severe bleeding episodes, the optimal treatment approach--prophylaxis--is ineffective unless inhibitors are eliminated. Several protocols for immune tolerance induction have been used. Success rates may vary depending both on patient variables and on factors related to the therapeutic regimen, including concentrate purity and von Willebrand factor (VWF) content. Several in vitro studies testing inhibitor plasma samples against various factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates have shown lower FVIII inhibitor titer compared with concentrates with greater VWF content. Recent in vivo observations also support the importance of VWF content, based on evidence of reduced rates of success of immune tolerance induction with use of the high-purity FVIII products that became available in the early 1990s. Current data thus support use of FVIII concentrates containing VWF in immune tolerance induction; other variables may also contribute to the relative success of this treatment. Studies are needed to delineate these variables in order to improve management of this potentially devastating complication of hemophilia treatment.

B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII preparations are bioequivalent to a monoclonal antibody purified plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate: a randomized, three-way crossover study

BACKGROUND

Deletion of the B-domain of recombinant blood coagulation factor VIII (BDDrFVIII) increases the manufacturing yield of the product but does not impair in vitro or in vivo functionality. BDDrFVIII (ReFacto) has been developed with the additional benefit of being formulated without human albumin.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this three-way crossover-design study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of two BDDrFVIII formulations (one reconstituted with 5 mL of sterile water, the other reconstituted with 4 mL sodium chloride 0.9% USP) with those of a plasma-derived, full-length FVIII preparation (Hemofil M) in patients with haemophilia A to determine bioequivalence.

METHODS

A series of blood samples were collected over a period of 48 h after i.v. administration of each of the FVIII preparations. Plasma FVIII activity was determined using a validated chromogenic substrate assay. Plasma FVIII activity vs. time curves was characterized for a standard set of PK parameter estimates. Two parameter estimates, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under plasma concentration vs. time curves (AUCs), were used to evaluate bioequivalence. The two preparations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of geometric means for Cmax and AUCs fell within the bioequivalence window of 80% to 125%.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Results show that each BDDrFVIII formulation is bioequivalent to Hemofil M and the two formulations of BDDrFVIII are bioequivalent to each other.

Hemophilia therapy innovation: development of an advanced category recombinant factor VIII by a plasma/albumin-free method. Proceedings of a Special Symposium at the XIXth Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, July 12-18, 2003, Birmingham, UK

Replacement therapy for hemophilia A has evolved from the early use of whole blood, citrated plasma, and cryoprecipitate, to purified factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, first derived from plasma, then produced by recombinant DNA technology. Recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates have provided improved safety for patients with hemophilia A since they significantly reduce the risk of transmission of blood-borne infections. Nevertheless, human- or animal-derived plasma proteins are still included at some step in preparation of all previously licensed rFVIII, thereby introducing the potential for transmission of human or animal pathogens. Anti-hemophilic factor (recombinant), plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM), a novel advanced category rFVIII produced without the addition of human or animal plasma proteins, has been developed with the goal of providing the greatest possible margin of safety to hemophilia patients. This report, based on a symposium of the XIXth International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress, provides an overview of the rAHF-PFM development program as well as current findings from the global clinical evaluation of rAHF-PFM in pediatric and adult previously treated patients.

Hemophilia gene transfer: comparison with conventional protein replacement therapy

One of the unanswered questions in hemophilia is whether gene transfer, if successful, will be a safe and effective alternative to standard clotting factor treatment for hemophilia. Despite life-threatening complications of protein-based clotting factor treatment during the last three decades, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis C, factor infusion is now considered safe, effective, and compatible with a normal lifespan. Thus, protein-based therapy will be the standard against which the safety and efficacy of gene transfer will be judged. Will the potential risks of gene transfer be sufficiently low to justify its use? Should all individuals with hemophilia consider gene transfer? To answer these questions, the known risks and benefits of current protein-based therapy must be compared with the potential risks and benefits of gene transfer. It is anticipated that risks of gene transfer may include the known risks of protein-based therapies, including allergic reactions, inflammatory responses, inhibitor formation, chronic hepatitis, as well as gene-transfer-specific risks, including germline transmission, insertional mutagenesis, thrombosis, and potential ethical and psychological issues. This article reviews and compares the risks and benefits of standard protein-based therapy with those of gene transfer, and considers how gene transfer might fit into state-of-the-art management of hemophilia.

Clinical gene transfer studies for hemophilia A

The recent advances in gene transfer technology have expedited the development of gene therapy for the treatment of hemophilia A. Three different U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved phase I clinical trials had been initiated using different gene therapy approaches each with their own advantages and limitations. In the first gene therapy trial for hemophilia A, a non-viral approach was being explored for patients with severe hemophilia A using ex vivo transfected dermal fibroblast expressing B-domain-deleted factor VIII ( BDD-FVIII). There were no serious adverse events and some patients appeared to have experienced fewer bleeding episodes with very low levels of FVIII near baseline. In the second trial, onco-retroviral vectors expressing BDD-FVIII were injected by peripheral intravenous infusion in adult patients suffering from severe hemophilia A. The procedure was safe and in some patients FVIII-transduced cells were detectable in the peripheral blood for more than a year. Although no sustained FVIII expression was detectable, occasional modest changes in FVIII levels were apparent, and in some cases a reduced bleeding frequency occurred compared with historical rates. In another trial, one patient suffering from severe hemophilia A has been treated with a high-capacity (or gutless) adenoviral vector expressing full-length FVIII, which appeared to have resulted in 1% of normal FVIII levels for several months. However, a transient inflammatory response with hematologic and liver abnormalities was observed. In conclusion, although modest improvements in clinical end points have been detected in some patients in these early phase I trials, further improvements in gene delivery technologies are warranted to bring hemophilia A gene therapy one step closer to reality.

Clinical evaluation of an advanced category antihaemophilic factor prepared using a plasma/albumin-free method: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in previously treated patients with haemophilia A1

The efficacy and safety of an advanced category recombinant antihaemophilic factor produced by a plasma- and albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) was studied in 111 previously treated subjects with haemophilia A. The study comprised a randomized, double-blinded, crossover pharmacokinetic comparison of rAHF-PFM and RECOMBINATE rAHF (R-FVIII); prophylaxis (three to four times per week with 25-40 IU kg(-1) rAHF-PFM) for at least 75 exposure days; and treatment of episodic haemorrhagic events. Median age was 18 years, 96% of subjects had baseline factor VIII <1%, and 108 received study drug. Bioequivalence, based on area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and adjusted in vivo recovery, was demonstrated for rAHF-PFM and R-FVIII. Mean (+/-SD) half-life for rAHF-PFM was 12.0 +/- 4.3 h. Among 510 bleeding events, 473 (93%) were managed with one or two infusions of rAHF-PFM and 439 (86%) had efficacy ratings of excellent or good. Subjects who were less adherent to the prophylactic regimen had a higher bleeding rate (9.9 episodes subject(-1) year(-1)) than subjects who were more adherent (4.4 episodes subject(-1) year(-1); P < 0.03). One subject developed a low titre, non-persistent inhibitor (2.0 BU) after 26 exposure days. These data demonstrate that rAHF-PFM is bioequivalent to R-FVIII, and suggest that rAHF-PFM is efficacious and safe, without increased immunogenicity, for the treatment of haemophilia A.

Continuous infusion of B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII (ReFacto) in patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery: clinical experience

This retrospective, open-label, non-comparative study evaluated continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIII (ReFacto), B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDDrFVIII), in patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery and requiring >5 consecutive days of treatment. Sixteen patients from eight centres underwent a total of 20 procedures. Haemostatic outcome was assessed as 'excellent' or 'good' in 75% of procedures, and target FVIII:C levels were maintained throughout the continuous infusion period. The reported volume of blood loss during surgery was also within the normal range for non-haemophilic patients for the type of surgery performed. Red blood cell transfusions were required to balance excessive blood loss during BDDrFVIII continuous infusion in eight (40%) procedures (seven patients), five with bleeding or requiring volume replacement and three to treat anaemia secondary to blood loss. Non-serious adverse events considered by investigators as possibly or probably related to BDDrFVIII continuous infusion were infrequent (n = 5) considering the duration of treatment (n =239 cumulative days of continuous infusion), and all of these were mild-to-moderate in severity. No thromboembolic complications were reported except for one case of thrombophlebitis occurring at the infusion site. Only two patients (four events) experienced serious adverse bleeding; BDDrFVIII was otherwise well-tolerated. These data show that continuous infusion of BDDrFVIII provides reliable haemostasis and is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery.

Clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic properties of the factor VIII concentrate HaemoctinR SDH in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A

Clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic properties of the high-purity double-virus inactivated plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate Haemoctin SDH (pdFVIII) were evaluated in three prospective open-label uncontrolled studies in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A. The pharmacokinetic properties assessed at baseline and after 3 months of treatment are in accurate accordance with published data and remain unchanged over time (study A, n = 12). Mean terminal elimination half-life was 11.8 and 11.9 h, mean incremental recovery (IU dL(-1)/IU kg(-1)) was 2.3 and 2.0, respectively. Long-term efficacy and safety, in particular the potential immunogenicity, were investigated in a total of 53 PTPs (studies A and B) treated prophylactically and on-demand, as required. PdFVIII has shown to be effective in preventing and controlling bleeding episodes; 23.5% of patients were free of bleeding events. A total of 177 haemorrhages occurred with 74.0% resolving after a single infusion, 87.6% within two infusions. 98.3% of responses reported on haemorrhages were rated as 'excellent' or 'good'. Moreover, 'excellent' haemostatic efficacy has been demonstrated in 10 surgical procedures including general and severe orthopaedic interventions (study C). No complication occurred in any surgery. Few adverse events were reported, one patient developed a high-titre FVIII inhibitor without clinical relevance. In all three studies, over 6 million units were administered in nearly 4300 infusions, approximately 94% units or infusions were given for prophylaxis and only 6% for treatment on-demand. In conclusion, pdFVIII has shown to be effective, safe and well tolerated in long-term prophylaxis and treatment on-demand as well as after minor and major surgical procedures.

Human parvovirus B19 in young male patients with hemophilia A: associations with treatment product exposure and joint range-of-motion limitation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the risk of human parvovirus B19 (B19) transmission in recombinant antihemophilic factor, the seroprevalence among 798 two- to seven-year-old boys with hemophilia was compared. Also, data collected on joints were used to assess relations between B19 serostatus and joint range-of-motion (ROM) limitation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Staff at US hemophilia treatment centers collected data on product exposures and ROM of 10 joints and provided blood specimens as part of blood safety surveillance. Blood was tested for immunoglobulin G anti-B19. Associations between B19 seropositivity and treatment products and joint ROM limitations were examined in multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Compared to children who received no product, the odds of B19 seropositivity were 0.8 (p = 0.5), 1.9 (p = 0.05), and 7.6 (p < 0.001) for those children who received recombinant antihemophilic factor only, both recombinant antihemophilic factor and plasma-derived factor, and plasma-derived factor only, respectively. Children who were anti-B19 positive had an average 8 degrees less overall ROM (p = 0.002) than those who were B19 antibody negative after adjustment for other risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The risk of B19 transmission by recombinant antihemophilic factor is low. Previous B19 infection is associated with ROM limitations in very young male patients with hemophilia. Virus inactivation techniques effective against B19 and other nonenveloped viruses are needed.

Human recombinant DNA-derived antihemophilic factor in the treatment of previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: final report on a hallmark clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

Development of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) replacement therapy represents a milestone in the treatment of hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this long-term, multicenter study was to assess the safety, efficacy and rate of inhibitor formation of rFVIII (Kogenate) in the treatment of hemophilia A in a group of previously untreated patients (PUPs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1989 and October 1997, 102 evaluable patients (mean age 3.9 years) were treated with rFVIII as sole therapy for prophylaxis against bleeding or for hemorrhage. Patients with mild hemophilia were treated for > or =2 years, while those with moderate or severe hemophilia were treated for > or =5 years or 100 exposure days.

RESULTS

All patients responded well to therapy, so that 82% of bleeding episodes required a single infusion for treatment. Only four mild drug-related adverse events were recorded during the study for an overall rate of 0.03% (4/13 464 infusions). No viral seroconversions were observed. The inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia was 29% (19/65). Overall, inhibitory antibodies developed in 21 patients (20.6%). Inhibitor titers were low (<10 Bethesda Units) in nine of the 21 patients despite continued episodic treatment with rFVIII and transient in eight patients receiving episodic treatment (seven low titer, one high titer). Eight high-titer inhibitor patients were treated with immune-tolerance induction therapy; five had successful outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed incidence of inhibitor formation is similar to studies of PUPs receiving plasma-derived FVIII. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of rFVIII in long-term treatment of hemophilia A.

A retrospective survey on the safety of Replenate®, a high-purity factor VIII concentrate

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of a highly purified, plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate (Replenate) in routine clinical use.

METHODS

Following guidelines entitled safety assessment of marketed medicines (SAMM), safety data were collected in the UK on 194 patients who received an estimated 47.6 million IU of Replenate. This population included 47 patients undergoing 53 surgical operations or dental extractions.

RESULTS

The study detected four cases of new factor VIII inhibitor development and twelve other adverse events, five that were unrelated to the product, five whose causality was unknown, one that was possibly product-related and one case due to possible lack of efficacy. Only one of these cases had been notified to the manufacturer through conventional spontaneous reporting procedures. Three patients were switched from Replenate as a result of an adverse event (one case of infusion site irritation and two cases of a rise in titre of an existing inhibitor), but no unexpected adverse reactions were noted and there were no reports of virus transmission. The median factor VIII recovery value was 2.17 IU/dl per IU/kg, but recovery was shown to be dependent on several variables, namely inhibitor status, treatment centre and the patient's body weight. The median factor VIII recovery in inhibitor-free patients was 2.28 IU/dl per IU/kg (range: 1.20-6.62).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that Replenate is well tolerated by the majority of patients in routine clinical practice.

Environmental and genetic factors influencing inhibitor development

Inhibitor formation occurs at a frequency of 20% to 30% in severe hemophilia A, and 3% in hemophilia B. Today, it represents the major complication in patient care and renders classical substitution therapy ineffective. Genetic factors, such as factor VIII (FVIII) gene mutations and immune response genes, particularly the major histocompatibility complex, have been shown to constitute decisive risk factors for the development of inhibitors. In severe hemophilia A and B, those mutations that result in the absence or severe truncation of the FVIII/factor IX (FIX) proteins are associated with the highest risk for inhibitor formation, indicating that a major driving force in inhibitor development is the presentation of a novel antigen to the patient's immune system. An alternative pathomechanism may underlie inhibitor development in patients with mild hemophilia A. Missense mutations, especially those in the C1/C2 domains, may alter the immunogenicity of the FVIII protein, eliciting an inhibitor response against the mutated epitope. In some patients with hemophilia B, especially those with large deletions to the FIX gene, a severe allergic reaction occurs simultaneously with inhibitor onset. Despite the obviously strong genetic predisposition, discordant inhibitor status in monozygotic hemophilia A twins demonstrates that environmental factors also play a role in the development of inhibitors.

Successful treatment of urgent bleeding in von Willebrand disease with factor VIII/VWF concentrate (Humate-P®): use of the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) to measure potency and to guide therapy

This prospective, open-label, non-randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of factor VIII (FVIII)/von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentrate (Humate-P) using treatment regimens based on VWF:ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity in patients with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) in (i) urgent bleeding episodes, or (ii) in patients undergoing urgent and necessary surgery. This article summarizes the results of treatment for the 33 patients with 53 urgent bleeding events. The median loading dose of FVIII/VWF concentrate was 67.0 international units per kilogram (IU kg(-1)) VWF:RCo (range 25.7-143.2 IU kg(-1)), and the median daily maintenance dose per infusion was 74.0 IU kg(-1) (range 16.4-182.9 IU kg(-1)) for a median duration of 2 days (range 1-34 days). The overall efficacy (achievement of haemostasis) of FVIII/VWF concentrate was rated as excellent/good for 98% of the urgent bleeding events. No unexpected treatment-related adverse events or serious drug-related adverse events (AEs) were observed. This study supports the safety and efficacy of Humate-P administered in doses calculated in VWF:RCo units for the treatment of urgent bleeding episodes in patients with VWD.

Efficacy and safety of factor VIII/von Willebrand's factor concentrate (Haemate-P) in preventing bleeding during surgery or invasive procedures in patients with von Willebrand disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate Haemate-P as replacement therapy in patients with von Willebrand's disease (VWD) undergoing surgical or invasive procedures.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Between January 1996 and October 2002, 26 patients (12 males and 14 females, median age 41.5 years, range 9-80 years), followed at three Italian Hemophilia Centers (Trento, Verona and Parma), with VWD type 1 (19 cases) and VWD type 2B (7 cases), underwent 43 surgical or invasive procedures: major surgery (14 cases), minor surgery (11 cases), dental extractions (11 cases), invasive diagnostic procedures (7 cases). Replacement therapy with factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate (Haemate-P) was administered in the surgical setting as perioperative prophylaxis against excessive bleeding.

RESULTS

The mean total dose (range) of Haemate-P used for major surgery was 284.1 IU VWF:RCo/kg (range 125.0-976.4), for minor surgery it was 120.8 IU VWF:RCo/kg (range 42.9-173.3), for dental extractions it was 38.4 IU VWF:RCo/kg (range 23.5-100.0) and for invasive procedures it was 87.3 VWF:RCo/kg (range 27.3-160.0). We recorded one bleeding episode 3 days after multiple dental extractions in a patient with severe periodontal disease; this bleeding was controlled with 2 further administrations of concentrate. We did not observe thrombotic episodes or other side effects following infusion of the concentrate.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, Haemate-P was effective and safe in preventing excessive bleeding after major and minor surgery or invasive procedures in VWD patients.

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates induces skew in T-cell receptor usage and clonal expansion of CD8+ T-cell in HIV-seronegative hemophilia patients

Replacement therapy with factor VIII (FVIII) products causes immune abnormalities in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative hemophilia patients. However, the question remains why an absolute increase in the number of CD8+ T-cells and diminished proliferation responses of lymphocytes to antigen stimulation in vitro occurs in HIV-seronegative hemophilia patients. To examine whether the FVIII products induce skewing of T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires, TCR variable region alpha-chain and beta-chain repertoires were analyzed for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 15 hemophilia patients treated with heated and/or non-heated plasma-derived FVIII concentrates and 10 age-matched healthy adults. Also, T-cell clonality was compared between these groups using complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) size spectratyping. The skewing of TCR repertoires was significantly greater for hemophilia patients than healthy controls. The extent of T-cell clonality was greater for hemophilia patients than the controls, indicating that clonal T-cells frequently expanded in hemophilia patients. The skew in TCR usage and clonal expansion were primarily observed in patients treated with non-heated plasma-derived products. The spectratyping and sequencing of CDR3 regions revealed that the clonal expansion of T-cells was observed for CD8+ T-cells, but not CD4+ T-cells. These results suggest that extensive expansion of CD8+ T-cells is induced by some viruses other than HIV present in FVIII preparations, and the resulting accumulation of CD8+ T-cells is responsible for changes in peripheral T-cell population in HIV-seronegative hemophilia patients.

[Intravenous catheter occlusion during continuous infusion of a new recombinant factor VIII concentrate]

We experienced catheter occlusion in two cases during continuous infusion of a new recombinant factor VIII concentrate (Kogenate FS, Bayer) during orthopedic surgery. In one of the cases, the infusion was completed by diluting Kogenate FS 1:4 with distilled water. These catheter occlusions might be caused by local clot formation due to the relatively high concentration of factor VIII in the continuous infusion route.

In vivo recovery and safety of human factor VIII product AAFACT in patients with haemophilia A

AAFACT, a monoclonal purified, solvent/detergent treated human plasma-derived coagulation factor VIII concentrate obtained from plasma of voluntary, non-remunerated blood donors, is manufactured and marketed in the Netherlands by Sanquin Plasma Products since 1995. In a postmarketing surveillance study, 70 previously treated haemophilia A patients were included (73% severe, 14% moderate and 13% mild haemophilia A). Most of these patients were followed during 4 years for the appearance of adverse events, possible transmissions of blood-borne viruses and the occurrence of antibodies against FVIII. The efficacy of treatment was determined in each patient by the in vivo recovery of FVIII. During this study, only six adverse events, possibly related to the use of AAFACT, were reported. None of these were indicated as serious. Transmissions of HIV, HAV, HBV and HCV in the seronegative patients have not been observed. In none of the patients, inhibitors to FVIII were detected. The in vivo recovery of FVIII during this study was not different from the in vivo recovery observed in eight patients during the preregistration study. There was a correlation of in vivo recovery with age and body weight. From these results, we conclude that the clinical usage of this human plasma-derived FVIII product is efficient and safe.

Successful management of life-threatening hemorrhage in a patient with synchronous lupus anticoagulant and factor VIII inhibitor

Acquired factor VIII inhibitor is increasingly recognized as a cause of major soft tissue hemorrhage. The laboratory diagnosis can be obscured by the synchronous presence of the lupus anticoagulant, an extremely rare occurrence that has been reported outside the vascular surgery literature. Vascular surgeons should be knowledgeable of factor VIII inhibitor and aware that it can present with other blood disorders, making the diagnosis more difficult and management more complex. This case report describes such a patient and reviews the current literature on this topic.

Safety of the new generation recombinant factor concentrates

Haemophilia A and B are X-linked disorders resulting from deficiency of Factor VIII and IX, respectively. Clinical sequellae of Factor VIII or IX deficiency include spontaneous and traumatic haemorrhages into joints, soft tissues, and muscles. The cornerstone of therapy has been replacement of the deficient factor, historically with pooled-plasma derivatives. The unfortunate blood-borne infection transmission (such as HIV, hepatitis B and C viruses), inhibitor formation, immunosuppression, and, in certain cases, thrombosis by these products has spawned major advances and innovations in the manufacture of clotting products. Recombinant technology has virtually eliminated transmissible disease risk; yet, the presence of albumin in second and third generation recombinant products raises, at the least, theoretical risk of prions and parvovirus B19. Other non-infectious complications, including inhibitor formation, allergic reactions, and thrombosis, remain formidable concerns. Despite this, recombinant factors remain the most attractive treatment approach for haemophilia. Future improvement awaits the development of safe and effective gene transfer technology.

Venous thrombosis following the use of intermediate purity FVIII concentrate to treat patients with von Willebrand's disease

We describe four patients with von Willebrand's disease (VWD) who experienced venous thrombosis after treatment with an intermediate purity factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate (Haemate P3) was used to cover invasive or surgical procedures. Most patients had additional risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and it is difficult to be certain of the contribution of the concentrate to the VTE. In view of the recognised association between high factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) levels and VTE there is a physiological basis for this complication and it is important to consider this when administering FVIII containing concentrates to VWD patients.

Molecular characterization of the immune response to factor VIII

Inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII arise from an alloimmune response in patients with hemophilia A infused with factor VIII and as an autoimmune response in a variety of settings. The immune response to factor VIII is T-cell dependent. Helper T cells recognize numerous epitopes in the factor VIII molecule. B cell epitopes in both the alloimmune and autoimmune responses are much more restricted, usually involving two major epitopes in the A2 and C2 domains and apparently minor epitopes in the light chain activation peptide (ap) region and the A3 domain. Anti-C2 antibodies inhibit the binding of factor VIII to phospholipid and may also interfere with the binding of factor VIII to von Willebrand factor. Anti-A2 and anti-A3 antibodies block the binding of factor VIII to factor X and factor IXa, respectively, in the intrinsic pathway factor X activation complex. The mechanism of inhibition of anti-ap antibodies is unknown. A murine hemophilia A model has been developed to study the immunogenicity of factor VIII. This model may lead to improved approaches to prevent development of inhibitory antibodies and to reverse the immune response if it develops.

Concentrate safety and efficacy

Safety from transmission of infections through plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates is assured by improved donor screening, serological testing of individual donations and direct viral testing of small plasma pools. Modern viral-inactivation techniques are highly effective. Recombinant concentrates stabilized in human albumin are being superaeded by those with other stabilizers. Recently reported discrepancies between estimates of concentrate potency from in vitro assays versus in vivo recovery, depending upon type of assay and reference standard used, are not fully resolved.

Continuous infusion of coagulation factor products

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical information related to the use of continuous infusion factor products in patients with hemophilia. Specifically, case reports and open-label trials are summarized involving the use of factor VIII and recombinant factor VIIa for a variety of indications including surgical prophylaxis, acute bleeding, primary prevention, and management of inhibitors. In addition, issues surrounding the use of continuous infusion of factor products such as pharmacokinetic rationale, stability/sterility, and cost are reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1990-June 2001) and through secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data concerning the administration of factor products are primarily detailed in open-label trials and case reports. Comparisons between intermittent bolus injections and continuous infusion of factor products are limited and primarily compare continuous infusion regimens with historical controls. The rationale behind the continuous-infusion approach is linked to the pharmacokinetics of factor products administered via this route. Pharmacokinetic data reveal that, with continuous infusion of factor products, a reduction in clearance and a maintenance of factor serum concentrations are noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of factor products (factor VIII and recombinant factor VIIa) via continuous infusion has produced favorable hemostatic effects compared with intermittent bolus injections. The advantages of continuous infusion include maintenance of a constant factor concentration, thereby reducing risk of bleeding from excessively low trough concentrations, and a decrease in factor consumption related to a reduction in factor clearance with constant infusion. Manufacturers recommend using reconstituted factor products either immediately or within 1-3 hours after reconstitution; however, several studies have found the products to be stable and sterile for longer periods.