Patterns of Failure After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Implication of Elective Nodal and Mucosal Dose Coverage

Purpose

We evaluated the geometric and dosimetric-based distribution of mucosal and nodal recurrences in patients with metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to cervical lymph nodes of unknown primary after intensity modulated radiation therapy using validated typology-indicative taxonomy.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the data of 260 patients who were irradiated between 2000 and 2015 and had a median follow-up time for surviving patients of 61 months. The mucosal and nodal recurrences were manually delineated on computed tomography images demonstrating the recurrences. The images were overlaid on the treatment plan using deformable image registration. The locations of the recurrences were determined relative to the original planning target volumes and doses using centroid-based approaches. Subsequently, the pattern of failures were classified into 5 types based on combined spatial and dosimetric criteria: A (central high dose), B (peripheral high dose), C (central elective dose), D (peripheral elective dose), and E (extraneous dose). For patients with type A failure with simultaneous nontype A lesions, the overall pattern of failures was defined as type A.

Results

Thirty-two patients had mucosal or nodal recurrences. The most common clinical nodal stage was N2b (66%). Preradiation therapy neck dissections were performed in 6 patients. The median dose delivered to clinical tumor volume 1 was 66 Gy. The majority (84%) had total/partial pharyngeal mucosa elective irradiation. Twenty-three patients had nodal recurrences, 8 had mucosal recurrences, and 1 had both nodal and mucosal recurrences. Twenty-one patients (91%) had type A nodal failure, and 7 of the mucosal failures (89%) were type C.

Conclusions

The majority of nodal recurrences occurred within the high-dose area, demanding the need for identification of radioresistant areas within malignant nodes. Future studies should focus on either dose escalation of high-risk volumes or novel radiosensitizers.

Prospective observational evaluation of radiation-induced late taste impairment kinetics in oropharyngeal cancer patients: Potential for improvement over time?

•

The majority of OPC patients are affected from late taste impairment after RT.

•

Taste markedly improved in the first years from end of RT, but plateaued after year 5.

•

Treatment site, CTV1 dose and age might have an influence on taste impairment.

Background and purpose

Taste impairment is a common radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients acutely. However, data on the potential for recovery and the time dependent course of late taste impairment are limited.

Materials and methods

As part of an IRB-approved observational prospective study, HNC patients underwent serial surveys including the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck module (MDASI-HN). For our analysis, we extracted MDASI-HN taste item results from oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy and at least two taste assessments after ≥1 year from end of radiotherapy (RT).

Results

1214 MDASI taste items from 326 patients between 1 and 13 years post-RT were included. Median prescribed dose to the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV1) was 66.0 Gy, with 180 patients (55%) receiving chemotherapy. Taste markedly improved in the first years from end of RT, but plateaued after year 5. In patients with taste assessment in subsequent years, a significant reduction in taste impairment was found from the second to the third year (p = 0.001) and tended towards significance from the third to the fourth year (p = 0.058). Multivariate analysis revealed treatment site as significant factor in the sixth year from RT and CTV1 dose and age in the seventh year.

Conclusion

Radiation-induced taste impairment may improve over an extended time interval, but becomes relatively stable from year 5 post-RT. Direct characterization of RT-induced taste impairment and the calculation of normal tissue complication probability should include consideration of the time-dependent course in taste recovery.

Changing practice patterns in head and neck oncologic surgery in the early COVID-19 era

BACKGROUND

The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed health care, challenged by resource constraints and fears of transmission. We report the surgical practice pattern changes in a Head and Neck Surgery department of a tertiary cancer care center and discuss the issues surrounding multidisciplinary care during the pandemic.

METHODS

We report data regarding outpatient visits, multidisciplinary treatment planning conference, surgical caseload, and modifications of oncologic therapy during this pandemic and compared this data to the same interval last year.

RESULTS

We found a 46.7% decrease in outpatient visits and a 46.8% decrease in surgical caseload, compared to 2019. We discuss the factors involved in the decision-making process and perioperative considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical practice patterns in head and neck oncologic surgery will continue to change with the evolving pandemic. Despite constraints, we strive to prioritize and balance the oncologic and safety needs of patients with head and neck cancer in the face of COVID-19.

Comparison of tumor delineation using dual energy computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer re-irradiation cases

•

GTVs on the 60 kV and 140 kV from DECT, and the T1c and T2 from MRI were compared.

•

Delineation was the most consistent using T1c (no interobserver difference in DSC).

•

T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base tumors.

•

60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base tumors.

In treatment planning, multiple imaging modalities can be employed to improve the accuracy of tumor delineation but this can be costly. This study aimed to compare the interobserver consistency of using dual energy computed tomography (DECT) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for delineating tumors in the head and neck cancer (HNC) re-irradiation scenario. Twenty-three patients with recurrent HNC and had planning DECT and MRI were identified. Contoured tumor volumes by seven radiation oncologists were compared. Overall, T1c MRI performed the best with median DSC of 0.58 (0–0.91) for T1c. T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base sites and 60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base sites.

Neurologic sequelae following radiation with and without chemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Patient reported outcomes study

BACKGROUND

There is little data describing neurocognitive late sequelae in patients treated for oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS

Using PROs, scores for "numbness/tingling" and "difficulty remembering" were assessed. Wilcoxon testing was utilized to compare mean assessment scores (1-10) between treatment subgroups.

RESULTS

Four-hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated and 267 (54%) received chemotherapy. The mean score for numbness/tingling for patients receiving radiation alone was 0.99 and for each chemotherapy subgroup were: Induction chemotherapy (IC), 1.35 (n = 99); concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT), 1.04 (n = 111) and IC + CCRT, 2.48 (n = 57); 30% of patients who received IC + CCRT had scores ≥5. The mean scores for difficulty remembering were XRT: 1.44, chemotherapy: 1.45, and IC + CCRT subgroup: 2.42.

CONCLUSIONS

The symptom burden related to peripheral neuropathy and cognitive complaints was minimal. A minority of patients reported high burdens. Particularly, 30% of patients receiving IC + CCRT described moderate to severe numbness/tingling.

Outcomes and toxicities following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases in patients with primary head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic head and neck cancers (HNCs) predominantly affect the lungs and have a two-year overall survival (OS) of 15% to 50%, if amenable for pulmonary metastasectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the two-year local control (LC), local-regional control (LRC) within the same lobe, OS, and toxicity rates in consecutive patients with metastatic pulmonary HNC who underwent stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) January 2007 to May 2018.

RESULTS

Evaluated 82 patients with 107 lung lesions, most commonly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 64%). Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 9.0-97.6). Systemic therapy administered in 34%. LC, LRC, and OS rates were 94%, 90%, and 62%. Patients with oligometastatic disease had a higher OS than polymetastatic disease, 72% vs 44% (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64; P = .008). OS in oligometastatic non-SCC and SCC were 100% and 66% (P = .03). There were no grade ≥3 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic pulmonary HNCs after SABR have a two-year OS rate comparable to pulmonary metastasectomy.

Data from a terminated study on iron oxide nanoparticle magnetic resonance imaging for head and neck tumors

Node positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) patients exhibit worse outcomes in terms of regional neck control, risk for distant metastases and overall survival. Smaller non-palpable lymph nodes may be inflammatory or may harbor clinically occult metastases, a characterization that can be challenging to make using routine imaging modalities. Ferumoxytol has been previously investigated as an intra-tumoral contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for intracranial malignancies and lymph node agent in prostate cancer. Hence, our group was motivated to carry out a prospective feasibility study to assess the feasibility of ferumoxytol dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-weighted MRI relative to that of gadolinium-based DCE-MRI for nodal and primary tumor imaging in patients with biopsy-proven node-positive HNSCC or melanoma. Although this institutional review board (IRB)-approved study was prematurely terminated because of an FDA black box warning, the investigators sought to curate and publish this unique dataset of matched clinical, and anatomical and DCE MRI data for the enrolled five patients to be available for scientists interested in molecular imaging.

Measurement(s)	imaging assay • head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Technology Type(s)	magnetic resonance imaging
Factor Type(s)	contrast agent
Sample Characteristic - Organism	Homo sapiens

Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11409516

Surveillance imaging for patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: A partially observed Markov decision process model

BACKGROUND

A possible surveillance model for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who received definitive radiotherapy was created using a partially observed Markov decision process. The goal of this model is to guide surveillance imaging policies after definitive radiotherapy.

METHODS

The partially observed Markov decision process model was formulated to determine the optimal times to scan patients. Transition probabilities were computed using a data set of 1508 patients with HNC who received definitive radiotherapy between the years 2000 and 2010. Kernel density estimation was used to smooth the sample distributions. The reward function was derived using cost estimates from the literature. Additional model parameters were estimated using either data from the literature or clinical expertise.

RESULTS

When considering all forms of relapse, the model showed that the optimal time between scans was longer than the time intervals used in the institutional guidelines. The optimal policy dictates that there should be less time between surveillance scans immediately after treatment compared with years after treatment. Comparable results also held when only locoregional relapses were considered as relapse events in the model. Simulation results for the inclusive relapse cases showed that <15% of patients experienced a relapse over a simulated 36-month surveillance program.

CONCLUSIONS

This model suggests that less frequent surveillance scan policies can maintain adequate information on relapse status for patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy. This model could potentially translate into a more cost-effective surveillance program for this group of patients.

Lymphopenia during radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Radiation-induced lymphopenia has been associated with poor survival outcomes in certain solid tumors such as esophageal, lung, cervical and pancreatic cancers. We aim to determine the effect of treatment-related lymphopenia during radiotherapy on outcomes of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who completed definitive radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and had blood counts taken during radiotherapy from 2002 to 2013 were included. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, clinical outcomes and lymphocyte counts during radiotherapy were recorded. Lymphopenia was graded according to the CTCAE v4.0. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests.

RESULTS

850 patients were evaluated. The median age was 57 years. The majority of the cohort had p16/HPV-positive disease (71%), 8% had HPV-negative disease and 21% were unknown. The median radiation total dose was 70 Gy. 45% of patients had induction chemotherapy, and 87% had concurrent chemotherapy. 703 (83%) patients developed ≥grade 3 (G3) lymphopenia and 209 (25%) had grade 4 (G4) lymphopenia during radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 59 months; the 5-year overall survival rate was 81%. There were no significant differences in overall survival rates nor in disease control rates, in those who developed G3/G4 lymphopenia compared with those who did not. No significant effect of lymphopenia on survival was observed when analyzed according to p16/HPV status.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients with oropharyngeal cancer, the development of lymphopenia during radiotherapy did not impact outcomes.

Estimating PTV Margins in Head and Neck Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) Through Target Site Analysis of Positioning and Intrafractional Accuracy

PURPOSE

Recurrent or previously irradiated head and neck cancers (HNC) are therapeutically challenging and may benefit from high-dose, highly accurate radiation techniques, such as stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Here, we compare set-up and positioning accuracy across HNC subsites to further optimize the treatment process and planning target volume (PTV) margin recommendations for head and neck SABR.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We prospectively collected data on 405 treatment fractions across 79 patients treated with SABR for recurrent/previously irradiated HNC. First, interfractional error was determined by comparing ExacTrac x-ray to the treatment plan. Patients were then shifted and residual error was measured with repeat x-ray. Next, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was compared with ExacTrac for positioning agreement, and final shifts were applied. Lastly, intrafractional error was measured with x-ray before each arc. Results were stratified by treatment site into skull base, neck/parotid, and mucosal.

RESULTS

Most patients (66.7%) were treated to 45 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 21-47.5 Gy in 3-5 fractions). The initial mean ± standard deviation interfractional errors were -0.2 ± 1.4 mm (anteroposterior), 0.2 ± 1.8 mm (craniocaudal), and -0.1 ± 1.7 mm (left-right). Interfractional 3-dimensional vector error was 2.48 ± 1.44, with skull base significantly lower than other sites (2.22 vs 2.77; P = .0016). All interfractional errors were corrected to within 1.3 mm and 1.8°. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac to within 3.6 mm and 3.4°. CBCT disagreements and intrafractional errors of >1 mm or >1° occurred at significantly lower rates in skull base sites (CBCT: 16.4% vs 50.0% neck, 52.0% mucosal, P < .0001; intrafractional: 22.0% vs 48.7% all others, P < .0001). Final PTVs were 1.5 mm (skull base), 2.0 mm (neck/parotid), and 1.8 mm (mucosal).

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck SABR PTV margins should be optimized by target site. PTV margins of 1.5 to 2 mm may be sufficient in the skull base, whereas 2 to 2.5 mm may be necessary for neck and mucosal targets. When using ExacTrac, skull base sites show significantly fewer uncertainties throughout the treatment process, but neck/mucosal targets may require the addition of CBCT to account for positioning errors and internal organ motion.

Minocycline for symptom reduction during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Local/systemic symptoms during cancer therapy may be exacerbated by dysregulated inflammation and its downstream toxic effects. Minocycline can suppress proinflammatory cytokine release; therefore, we investigated its potential to reduce patient-reported symptom severity during radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

Eligible patients for this blinded, placebo-controlled trial were adults with T0-3, N-any, and M0 HNC receiving single-modality RT. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either minocycline (200 mg/day) or placebo during RT. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) of 5 prespecified symptoms (pain, fatigue, disturbed sleep, poor appetite, difficulty swallowing/chewing) during RT, assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for HNC (MDASI-HN).

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 20 evaluable patients per arm. Overall, 75% had oropharyngeal cancer and 78% were male. No grade 3+ adverse events potentially related to study medication were observed. Two minocycline patients required a feeding tube during RT vs 5 placebo patients (P = 0.21). The average daily AUC during RT for the 5 MDASI-HN symptoms was 3.1 (SD = 1.0) for minocycline and 3.7 (SD = 1.7) for placebo (P = 0.16); the 0.37 effect size was less than our 0.70 target. AUC comparisons for several individual symptoms and symptom interference favored minocycline but were not statistically significant. The greatest numerical differences occurred for systemic symptoms, larger toward treatment end, and in early post-RT recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Minocycline was feasible, well tolerated, and achieved a positive signal toward reducing patient-reported symptom severity during RT for HNC, particularly for systemic symptoms. This justifies additional study and informs future trial design.

Outcomes of carotid-sparing IMRT for T1 glottic cancer: Comparison with conventional radiation

OBJECTIVES

We aim to report oncologic outcomes after conventional radiotherapy (ConRT) using opposed lateral beams and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for tumor (T)1 nodal (N)0 T1 N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics for patients treated at our institution during 2000 to 2013.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three patients (71%) were treated using ConRT and 62 (29%) using IMRT. The median follow-up for all patients was 68 months. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year local control between patients with T1a versus T1b disease (94% vs. 89%, respectively, P = 0.5). Three-year locoregional control for patients treated with ConRT was 94% compared to 97% with IMRT (P = 0.4). Three-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with ConRT was 92.5% compared with 100% with IMRT (P = 0.1). Twelve of 14 patients with local recurrence underwent salvage surgery with 5-year ultimate locoregional control of 98.5% and 97.1% in the ConRT and IMRT cohorts, respectively (P = 0.7). Multivariate analysis showed age < 60 years (P < 0.0001) and pretreatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 (P = 0.0022) to be independent correlates of improved OS. Postradiation cerebrovascular events were in four patients in the ConRT cohort (3%), whereas no patients in the IMRT cohort suffered any events.

CONCLUSION

Because the oncologic outcomes for patients treated with IMRT were excellent and IMRT allows for carotid sparing, we have transitioned to IMRT as our standard for most patients with T1 glottic cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 130:146-153, 2020.

Effect of True and Sham Acupuncture on Radiation-Induced Xerostomia Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) is a common, often debilitating, adverse effect of radiation therapy among patients with head and neck cancer. Quality of life can be severely affected, and current treatments have limited benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if acupuncture can prevent RIX in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This 2-center, phase 3, randomized clinical trial compared a standard care control (SCC) with true acupuncture (TA) and sham acupuncture (SA) among patients with oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were undergoing radiation therapy in comprehensive cancer centers in the United States and China. Patients were enrolled between December 16, 2011, and July 7, 2015. Final follow-up was August 15, 2016. Analyses were conducted February 1 through 28, 2019.

INTERVENTION

Either TA or SA using a validated acupuncture placebo device was performed 3 times per week during a 6- to 7-week course of radiation therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was RIX, as determined by the Xerostomia Questionnaire in which a higher score indicates worse RIX, for combined institutions 1 year after radiation therapy ended. Secondary outcomes included incidence of clinically significant xerostomia (score >30), salivary flow, quality of life, salivary constituents, and role of baseline expectancy related to acupuncture on outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 399 patients randomized, 339 were included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age, 51.3 [11.7] years; age range, 21-79 years; 258 [77.6%] men), including 112 patients in the TA group, 115 patients in the SA group, and 112 patients in the SCC group. For the primary aim, the adjusted least square mean (SD) xerostomia score in the TA group (26.6 [17.7]) was significantly lower than in the SCC group (34.8 [18.7]) (P = .001; effect size = -0.44) and marginally lower but not statistically significant different from the SA group (31.3 [18.6]) (P = .06; effect size = -0.26). Incidence of clinically significant xerostomia 1 year after radiation therapy ended followed a similar pattern, with 38 patients in the TA group (34.6%), 54 patients in the SA group (47.8%), and 60 patients in the SCC group (55.1%) experiencing clinically significant xerostomia (P = .009). Post hoc comparisons revealed a significant difference between the TA and SCC groups at both institutions, but TA was significantly different from SA only at Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China (estimated difference [SE]: TA vs SCC, -9.9 [2.5]; P < .001; SA vs SCC, -1.7 [2.5]; P = .50; TA vs SA, -8.2 [2.5]; P = .001), and SA was significantly different from SCC only at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (estimated difference [SE]: TA vs SCC, -8.1 [3.4]; P = .016; SA vs SCC, -10.5 [3.3]; P = .002; TA vs SA, 2.4 [3.2]; P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that TA resulted in significantly fewer and less severe RIX symptoms 1 year after treatment vs SCC. However, further studies are needed to confirm clinical relevance and generalizability of this finding and to evaluate inconsistencies in response to sham acupuncture between patients in the United States and China.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01266044.

International Guideline on Dose Prioritization and Acceptance Criteria in Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma requires high radiation doses. The balance of the risks of local recurrence owing to inadequate tumor coverage versus the potential damage to the adjacent organs at risk (OARs) is of critical importance. With advancements in technology, high target conformality is possible. Nonetheless, to achieve the best possible dose distribution, optimal setting of dose targets and dose prioritization for tumor volumes and various OARs is fundamental. Radiation doses should always be guided by the As Low As Reasonably Practicable principle. There are marked variations in practice. This study aimed to develop a guideline to serve as a global practical reference.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search on dose tolerances and normal-tissue complications after treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma was conducted. In addition, published guidelines and protocols on dose prioritization and constraints were reviewed. A text document and preliminary set of variants was circulated to a panel of international experts with publications or extensive experience in the field. An anonymized voting process was conducted to rank the proposed variants. A summary of the initial voting and different opinions expressed by members were then recirculated to the whole panel for review and reconsideration. Based on the comments of the panel, a refined second proposal was recirculated to the same panel. The current guideline was based on majority voting after repeated iteration for final agreement.

RESULTS

Variation in opinion among international experts was repeatedly iterated to develop a guideline describing appropriate dose prioritization and constraints. The percentage of final agreement on the recommended parameters and alternative views is shown. The rationale for the recommendations and the limitations of current evidence are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this comprehensive review of available evidence and interactive exchange of vast experience by international experts, a guideline was developed to provide a practical reference for setting dose prioritization and acceptance criteria for tumor volumes and OARs. The final decision on the treatment prescription should be based on the individual clinical situation and the patient's acceptance of optimal balance of risk.

Symptom Burden Associated With Late Lower Cranial Neuropathy in Long-term Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivors

Importance

Lower cranial neuropathy (LCNP) is a rare but potentially disabling result of radiotherapy and other head and neck cancer therapies. Survivors who develop late LCNP may experience profound functional impairment, with deficits in swallowing, speech, and voice.

Objective

To investigate the association of late LCNP with severity of cancer treatment-related symptoms and subsequent general functional impairment among oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional survey study analyzed 889 OPC survivors nested within a retrospective cohort of OPC survivors treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2013. Eligible survey participants were disease free and completed OPC treatment 1 year or more before the survey. Data analysis was performed from October 10, 2017, to March 15, 2018.

Exposures

Late LCNP defined by onset 3 months or more after cancer therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome variable was the mean of the top 5 most severely scored symptoms of all 22 core and head and neck cancer-specific symptoms from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck Cancer Module (MDASI-HN). Secondary outcomes included mean MDASI-HN interference scores and single-item scores of the most severe symptoms. Multivariate models regressed MDASI-HN scores on late LCNP status, adjusting for clinical covariates.

Results

Overall, 36 of 889 OPC survivors (4.0%) (753 [84.7%] male; 821 [92.4%] white; median [range] age, 56 [32-84] years; median [range] survival time, 7 [1-16] years) developed late LCNP. Late LCNP was significantly associated with worse mean top 5 MDASI-HN symptom scores (coefficient, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.82-2.26), adjusting for age, survival time, sex, therapeutic modality, T stage, subsite, type of radiotherapy, smoking, and normal diet before treatment. Late LCNP was also significantly associated with single-item scores for difficulty swallowing or chewing (coefficient, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.33-3.18), mucus (coefficient, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.03-2.91), fatigue (coefficient, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.40-2.21), choking (coefficient, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.65-2.41), and voice or speech symptoms (coefficient, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.60-3.03) in multivariable models. Late LCNP was not significantly associated with mean interference scores after correction for multiple comparisons (mean interference coefficient, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.09-1.35).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large survey study, OPC survivors with late LCNP reported worse cancer treatment-related symptoms, a finding suggesting an association between late LCNP and symptom burden. This research may inform the development and implementation of strategies for LCNP surveillance and management.

Six habits of highly successful health information technology: powerful strategies for design and implementation

Healthcare information technologies are now a routine component of patient-clinician interactions. Originally designed for operational functions including billing and regulatory compliance, these systems have had unintended consequences including increased exam room documentation, divided attention during the visit, and use of scribes to alleviate documentation burdens. In an age in which technology is ubiquitous in everyday life, we must re-envision healthcare technology to support both clinical operations and, above all, the patient-clinician relationship. We present 6 habits for designing user-centered health technologies: (1) put patient care first, (2) assemble a team with the right skills, (3) relentlessly ask WHY, (4) keep it simple, (5) be Darwinian, and (6) don't lose the forest for the trees. These habits should open dialogues between developers, implementers, end users, and stakeholders, as well as outline a path for better, more usable technology that puts patients and their clinicians back at the center of care.

Risk of second primary malignancies in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy

Second primary malignancy (SPM) may occur after index head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. This study evaluated the prevalence and outcome of SPM in patients with HNC treated with definitive radiotherapy. Eligible patients include those with index mucosal HNC treated with definitive radiotherapy between 2000 and 2010. SPM was defined as an invasive cancer at a noncontiguous site diagnosed at least 6 months after completion of radiotherapy. Clinical data were collected, and the Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival. In total, 1512 patients were studied. The majority of patients had index oropharyngeal cancer (86%). In all, 130 (9%) patients developed a SPM. The risk of SPM increased exponentially with time with 5-, 10-, and 15-year rates of 4, 10, and 25%. Half of SPMs were within the head and neck or thoracic regions. SPM rates were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in current smokers and former smokers than never smokers with 5-, 10-, and 15-year risk being: never smoker (2, 4, 14%), former smokers with <10-pack year (5, 10, 23%), former smokers with ≥10-pack year (5, 14, 35%), and current smokers (6, 18, 32%). In total, 102 (78%) had subsequent curative-intent therapy. The 5-year overall survival from SPM was 44%. The majority of SPMs were in those with significant smoking history reflecting the same risk factor as for the index mucosal HNC. Nearly one in two patients with SPMs were salvaged underscoring the importance of regular surveillance for SPMs.

Creating customized oral stents for head and neck radiotherapy using 3D scanning and printing

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and establish a digital workflow for the custom designing and 3D printing of mouth opening tongue-depressing (MOTD) stents for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 3 patients who received radiation therapy (RT) for primary head and neck cancers with MOTD stents. We compared two methods for obtaining the digital impressions of patients' teeth. The first method involved segmentation from computed tomography (CT) scans, as previously established by our group, and the second method used 3D scanning of the patients' articulated stone models that were made during the conventional stent fabrication process. Three independent observers repeated the process to obtain digital impressions which provided data to design customized MOTD stents. For each method, we evaluated the time efficiency, dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for reproducibility, and the 3D printed stents' accuracy. For the 3D scanning method, we evaluated the registration process using manual and automatic approaches.

RESULTS

For all patients, the 3D scanning method demonstrated a significant advantage over the CT scanning method in terms of time efficiency with over 60% reduction in time consumed (p < 0.0001) and reproducibility with significantly higher DSC (p < 0.001). The printed stents were tested over the articulated dental stone models, and the trueness of fit and accuracy of dental anatomy was found to be significantly better for MOTD stents made using the 3D scanning method. The automated registration showed higher accuracy with errors < 0.001 mm compared to manual registration.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an efficient workflow for custom designing and 3D-printing MOTD radiation stents. This workflow represents a considerable improvement over the CT-derived segmentation method. The application of this rapid and efficient digital workflow into radiation oncology practices can expand the use of these toxicity sparing devices to practices that do not currently have the support to make them.

Xerostomia-related quality of life for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton therapy

PURPOSE

We report longitudinal patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes related to xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated from May 2012 through December 2016 at a single institution for AJCC7 stage III-IV, M0 oropharyngeal cancer were given the 15-item Xerostomia-Related QoL Scale (XeQoLS) before, during, and for up to 2 years after treatment. We evaluated the evolution of xerostomia-related QoL over that time, and examined potential associations between those measures with clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients had XeQoLS scores at baseline and at least once either during or after treatment. The mean (±SD) XeQoLS score (0-4) was 0.24 ± 0.57 at baseline. Subsequent scores were 2.00 ± 1.01 at 6 weeks on treatment, and 1.03 ± 0.76, 0.97 ± 0.78, 0.82 ± 0.69, and 0.70 ± 0.75 at 10 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment, respectively. All were statistically different from baseline (p < 0.001). Univariate analyses demonstrated associations between XeQoLS score and time (p < 0.0001 for each interval), baseline XeQoLS score (p < 0.0001), stage (p = 0.008), N status (p = 0.006), and mean oral cavity dose (p = 0.038), but not for age, sex, T status, receipt of chemotherapy, smoking history, disease site, laterality of neck irradiation, mean parotid dose, or mean submandibular dose. Multivariate analysis suggested that baseline XeQoLS scores, phase of treatment, and N status were associated with XeQoLS scores measured during treatment and recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving IMPT reported the greatest xerostomia-related QoL impairment at 6 weeks on treatment, with a 49% improvement by 10 weeks after treatment; however, XeQoLS scores remained above baseline after 2 years. As we aim to establish the value of IMPT in oropharyngeal tumors to de-intensify treatment over conventional therapy, these data help inform discussions about xerostomia-related quality of life for patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with IMPT.

Nomogram to Predict the Benefit of Intensive Treatment for Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

Previous studies indicate that the benefit of therapy depends on patients' risk for cancer recurrence relative to noncancer mortality (ω ratio). We sought to test the hypothesis that patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) with a higher ω ratio selectively benefit from intensive therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed 2,688 patients with stage III-IVB HNC undergoing primary radiotherapy (RT) with or without systemic therapy on three phase III trials (RTOG 9003, RTOG 0129, and RTOG 0522). We used generalized competing event regression to stratify patients according to ω ratio and compared the effectiveness of intensive therapy as a function of predicted ω ratio (i.e., ω score). Intensive therapy was defined as treatment on an experimental arm with altered fractionation and/or multiagent concurrent systemic therapy. A nomogram was developed to predict patients' ω score on the basis of tumor, demographic, and health factors. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Decreasing age, improved performance status, higher body mass index, node-positive status, P16-negative status, and oral cavity primary predicted a higher ω ratio. Patients with ω score ≥0.80 were more likely to benefit from intensive treatment [5-year overall survival (OS), 70.0% vs. 56.6%; HR of 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.94; P = 0.016] than those with ω score <0.80 (5-year OS, 46.7% vs. 45.3%; HR of 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.14; P = 0.69; P = 0.019 for interaction). In contrast, the effectiveness of intensive therapy did not depend on risk of progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HNC with a higher ω score selectively benefit from intensive treatment. A nomogram was developed to help select patients for intensive therapy.

Complete Surgical Resection Following Neoadjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in BRAFV600E-Mutated Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

Background: When achieved, complete surgical resection improves outcomes in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). However, most ATC patients present with advanced inoperable disease, often with impending airway obstruction, increased hemorrhage risk, and significant dysphagia. Novel treatment strategies are critically needed to improve disease control and decrease locoregional morbidity. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a neoadjuvant regimen by using dabrafenib with trametinib followed by surgical resection in patients with initially unresectable BRAF^V600E-mutated ATC. Methods: Case series of six consecutive patients with BRAF^V600E-mutated ATC diagnosed between January 2017 and February 2018. Pathologic confirmation of ATC was obtained before treatment. BRAF^V600E status was ascertained via immunohistochemistry or sequencing of circulating tumor DNA. All patients received dabrafenib and trametinib (DT) followed by surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation. Three patients also received pembrolizumab. Results: Complete surgical resection was achieved in all patients. Histopathologic analyses of resected specimens showed high pathologic response rates with significantly decreased ATC viability and residual papillary thyroid carcinoma components. Overall survival at six months and one year was 100% and 83%, respectively. Locoregional control rate was 100%. Two patients died of distant metastases without evidence of locoregional disease at 8 and 14 months from diagnosis. The remaining four patients had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up. Conclusions: We report the first series in the literature of BRAF^V600E-mutated ATC patients with locoregionally advanced disease treated with DT followed by surgical resection. We demonstrated feasibility of complete resection, decreased need for tracheostomy, high pathologic response rates, and durable locoregional control with symptom amelioration.

Patient Outcomes after Reirradiation of Small Skull Base Tumors using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, or Proton Therapy

Purpose  The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who received reirradiation for small skull base tumors utilizing either intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and proton radiotherapy (PRT). Methods  Patients who received IMRT, SBRT or PRT reirradiation for recurrent or new small skull base tumors (< 60 cc) between April 2000 and July 2016 were identified. Those with < 3 months follow-up were excluded. Clinical outcomes and treatment toxicity were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the local control (LC), regional control (RC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results  Of the 75 patients eligible, 30 (40%) received SBRT, 30 (40%) received IMRT, and 15 (20%) received PRT. The median retreatment volume was 28 cc. The median reirradiation dose was 66 Gy in 33 fractions for IMRT/PRT, and 45 Gy in 5 fractions for SBRT. The median time to reirradiation was 41 months. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the LC, RC, DC, PFS, and OS rates were 84%, 79%, 82%, 60%, and 87% at 1 year, and 75%, 72%, 80%, 49%, and 74% at 2 years. There was no difference in OS between radiation modalities. The 1- and 2-year late Grade 3 toxicity rates were 3% and 11% respectively.. Conclusions  Reirradiation of small skull base tumors utilizing IMRT, PRT, or SBRT provided good local tumor control and low rates of Grade 3 late toxicity. A prospective clinical trial is needed to guide selection of radiation treatment modalities.

Abstract 456: Circulating tumor cells and cfDNA changes during radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

Introduction: Head and neck cancer treatment response relies heavily on macroscopic clinical findings. Blood monitoring of circulating markers such as circulating tumor cell (CTC) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) during treatment may improve earlier detection of responders versus non-responders during definitive radiotherapy. Our work prospectively describes the changes in CTC and cfDNA enumeration during definitive radiotherapy.

Methods: Patients with mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and intact gross tumor were eligible for the prospective IRB-approved PREDICT-HN study. Blood samples were collected pre-treatment, after first treatment, weekly, and post-treatment (CellSave and EDTA tubes). CTC was enumerated using the FDA-approved CellSearch (Menarini Silicon Biosystems) system. Filtered plasma were collected from the EDTA tubes and stored at -80C. cfNA from pre-, mid- and post-treatment timepoints were isolated from the filtered plasma using the MagMAX Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cfDNA were quantified with Qubit high sensitivity dsDNA assay (Invitrogen).

Results: 339 blood samples were collected from 45 patients; 137 had detectable CTC. Eight patients had detectable CTCs (1-3/7.5ml blood) in pre-treatment samples. After 1 fraction of radiotherapy, 16 patients had CTCs detected with 12 who had no CTC detected pre-treatment. 19 (42%) patients had detectable CTC in week 6 of treatment. All patients had detectable CTC at some point during radiotherapy except for one patient who had no CTC detected pre, during and post-treatment. There was no correlation between cancer stage, nodal status and gross tumor volume with detection of CTC. Overall circulating cfDNA levels increased during treatment, with their highest level in the final week of treatment similar to when the majority of CTC were detectable in patients, and lowest at the post-treatment time-point.

Conclusions: Our interim results showed, for the 1sttime, to our knowledge, that CTCs can be detected during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer, suggesting mobilization into peripheral circulation during treatment, with as-yet-unknown viability. cfDNA kinetics during treatment correlated with CTC release, may indicate apoptotic change during radiotherapy. Combined cfDNA-CTC as an early marker of treatment response should be investigated.

Citation Format: Sweet Ping Ng, Carolyn S. Hall, Salyna Meas, Vanessa N. Sarli, Houda Bahig, Baher Elgohari, Amy Moreno, Heath D. Skinner, Adam S. Garden, David I. Rosenthal, William H. Morrison, Jack Phan, G Brandon Gunn, Steven J. Frank, Clifton D. Fuller, Anthony Lucci. Circulating tumor cells and cfDNA changes during radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 456.

Validation of NRG oncology/RTOG-0129 risk groups for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: Implications for risk-based therapeutic intensity trials

BACKGROUND

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-0129 recursive partitioning analysis was the basis for risk-based therapeutic intensification trials for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). To the authors' knowledge, the question of whether RTOG-0129 overall survival (OS) estimates for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups are similar in other data sets or applicable to progression-free survival (PFS) is unknown. Therefore, the authors evaluated whether survival differences between RTOG-0129 risk groups persist at 5 years, are reproducible in an independent clinical trial, and are applicable to PFS, and whether toxicities differ across risk groups.

METHODS

Prospective randomized clinical trials were analyzed retrospectively. RTOG-0129 evaluated standard versus accelerated fractionation radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin. RTOG-0522 compared the combination of cisplatin and accelerated fractionation with or without cetuximab. Patients with OPC with available p16 status and tobacco history were eligible.

RESULTS

There was a total of 260 patients and 287 patients, respectively, from RTOG-0129 and RTOG-0522, with median follow-ups for surviving patients of 7.9 years (range, 1.7-9.9 years) and 4.7 years (range, 0.1-7.0 years), respectively. Previous OS differences in RTOG-0129 persisted at 5 years. In RTOG-0522, the 5-year OS rates for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 88.1%, 69.9%, and 45.1%, respectively (P for trend, <.001). The 5-year PFS rates for the same 3 groups were 72.9%, 56.1%, and 42.2%, respectively. In RTOG-0522 among a subgroup of patients considered to be at very good risk (p16-positive disease, smoking history of ≤10 pack-years, and classified with T1-T2 disease with ipsilateral lymph nodes measuring ≤6 cm or T3 disease without contralateral or >6 cm lymph nodes), the 5-year OS and PFS rates were 93.8% and 82.2%, respectively. Overall rates of acute and late toxicities were similar by risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

RTOG-0129 risk groups persisted at 5 years and were reproducible in RTOG-0522. However, there was variability in the estimates. These data underscore the importance of long-term follow-up and appropriate patient selection in therapeutic deintensification trials.