Fibrinogen and the prediction of residual obstruction manifested after pulmonary embolism treatment

Residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are both long-term complications of acute pulmonary embolism, but it is unknown whether RPVO can be predicted by variants of fibrinogen associated with CTEPH.We used the Akaike information criterion to select the best predictive models for RPVO in two prospectively followed cohorts of acute pulmonary embolism patients, using as candidate variables the extent of the initial obstruction, clinical characteristics and fibrinogen-related data. We measured the selected models' goodness of fit by analysis of deviance and compared models using the Chi-squared test.RPVO occurred in 29 (28.4%) out of 102 subjects in the first cohort and 46 (25.3%) out of 182 subjects in the second. The best-fit predictive model derived in the first cohort (p=0.0002) and validated in the second cohort (p=0.0005) implicated fibrinogen Bβ-chain monosialylation in the development of RPVO. When the derivation procedure excluded clinical characteristics, fibrinogen Bβ-chain monosialylation remained a predictor of RPVO in the best-fit predictive model (p=0.00003). Excluding fibrinogen characteristics worsened the predictive model (p=0.03).Fibrinogen Bβ-chain monosialylation, a common structural attribute of fibrin, helped predict RPVO after acute pulmonary embolism. Fibrin structure may contribute to the risk of developing RPVO.

Anti-tumour effect of low molecular weight heparin in localised lung cancer: a phase III clinical trial

The anti-tumour and anti-metastatic properties of heparins have not been tested in patients with early stage cancer. Whether adjuvant low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) tinzaparin impacts the survival of patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated.

Patients with completely resected stage I, II or IIIA NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous tinzaparin 100 IU·kg−1 once a day for 12 weeks or no treatment in addition to standard of care. The trial was open-label with blinded central adjudication of study outcomes. The primary outcome was overall survival.

In 549 patients randomised to tinzaparin (n=269) or control (n=280), mean±sd age was 61.6±8.9 years, 190 (34.6%) patients had stage II−III disease, and 220 (40.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% CI 0.92–1.68; p=0.17). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrence between groups (subdistribution HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.68–1.30; p=0.70).

Adjuvant tinzaparin had no detectable impact on overall and recurrence-free survival of patients with completely resected stage I−IIIA NSCLC. These results do not support further clinical evaluation of LMWHs as anti-tumour agents.

Impact of previous head and neck cancer on postoperative complications after surgical resection for lung cancer: a case-control study

Background

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and lung cancer are often linked because of common risk factors. We aimed to assess the risk of postoperative complications in patients with previous HNC undergoing thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

Patients with previous HNC undergoing surgery for lung cancer were included in this retrospective, monocentric, case-control study. All patients were matched for age, sex, FEV₁, smoking history, and year of surgery with lung cancer patients without previous HNC. Major postoperative complication was defined as at least one of the following during the first 30 days post lung resection (LR): death, shock, need for mechanical ventilation, and pneumonia.

Results

From January 2006 to May 2012, 65 patients with previous HNC underwent LR. Fifty-nine of these patients were included and matched with 120 control patients without HNC. Major complications occurred in 25 [42.4% (95% CI, 29.4-55.4%)] vs. 19 [15.8% (95% CI, 9.2-22.5%)] patients in the HNC and non-HNC groups, respectively (P<0.001). Among the complications, pneumonia occurred in 19 (32.2%) vs. 12 (10%) (P=0.01), and death occurred in 5 (8.5%) vs. 2 (1.7%) patients in the HNC and non-HNC groups, respectively (P=0.04). The following factors were identified by multivariate analysis to be independently associated with postoperative complications: previous HNC [odds ratio (OR) =4.24; (95% CI, 1.84-9.74)], male gender [OR =8.99; (95% CI, 1.05-76.78)], cumulative smoking [OR =1.02 per unit; (95% CI, 1.01-1.04)] and elevated Charlson score [OR =1.45; (95% CI, 1.07-1.96)].

Conclusions

Previous HNC is a major independent risk factor for serious postoperative complications after LR for lung cancer. Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is the most frequent complication.

Prise en charge de l'embolie pulmonaire grave en réanimation

L'embolie pulmonaire (EP) grave, définie par la présence d’un état de choc, est à l'origine d'une mortalité importante. L'objectif de cette mise au point est de synthétiser les dernières avancées et recommandations concernant la prise en charge des formes graves d'EP. La stratification du risque individuel de mortalité précoce permet d'apporter une stratégie diagnostique et thérapeutique optimisée pour chaque patient. Le traitement symptomatique consiste essentiellement en la prise en charge de l'état de choc. L'anticoagulation curative par héparine non fractionnée est réservée aux patients hémodynamiquement instables. Chez ces patients à haut risque, la thrombolyse systémique diminue la mortalité et le risque de récidive d'EP. Chez les patients à risque intermédiaire élevé, la thrombolyse systémique à dose standard diminue le risque de choc secondaire mais sans impact sur la mortalité globale. La thrombolyse est donc réservée aux patients à risque intermédiaire élevé présentant secondairement un état de choc. L'embolectomie chirurgicale reste indiquée en cas de contre-indication absolue à la thrombolyse ou en cas d'échec de celle-ci. Le positionnement dans l'algorithme thérapeutique de l'assistance extracorporelle et des techniques percutanées de revascularisation reste à définir. Leurs indications doivent donc être discutées dans des centres experts après une concertation multidisciplinaire incluant pneumologues, cardiologues, réanimateurs, radiologues interventionnels et chirurgiens cardiaques.

Apixaban versus Dalteparin for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: The Caravaggio Study

International and national guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. The aim of the Caravaggio study is to assess whether oral apixaban is non-inferior to subcutaneous dalteparin for the treatment of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer. The study is an investigator-initiated, multi-national, prospective, randomized, open-label with blind end-point evaluation (PROBE), non-inferiority clinical trial (NCT03045406). Consecutive patients are randomized to receive oral apixaban or subcutaneous dalteparin for 6 months. Apixaban is given at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days and then 5 mg twice daily; dalteparin is given at a dose of 200 IU/kg for the first month and then 150 IU/kg once daily. The primary outcome of the study is objectively confirmed recurrent VTE as assessed by a central independent adjudication committee unaware of study treatment allocation. The primary safety outcome is major bleeding defined according to the guidelines of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Assuming a 6-month incidence of the primary outcome of 7% with dalteparin and an upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio below the pre-specified margin of 2.00, 1,168 patients will be randomized considering an up to 20% loss in total patient-years (β = 80%; α one-sided = 0.025). The Caravaggio study has the potential, along with other recently performed or on-going studies, to make less cumbersome the management of VTE in patients with cancer by replacing parenteral with oral anticoagulation.

Determinants and prognostic implication of diagnostic delay in patients with a first episode of pulmonary embolism

Signs and symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are not specific and this can lead to a diagnostic delay. Little is known about the determinants of this delay and its prognostic implication. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort involving 514 patients with a first episode of PE. The diagnostic delay was defined as a time from first symptom onset to diagnosis of >3 days, corresponding of the median time in the population. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of diagnostic delay. Prognostic implication was measured as the occurrence of 30-day all-cause mortality, haemodynamic collapse or recurrent PE. A total of 240 (47%) among 514 patients had a time from first symptom to diagnosis > 3 days. Previous deep vein thrombosis (OR 0.55, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.32-0.93), immobilization (OR 0.52, 95% CI, 0.28-0.96), surgery (OR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.16-0.62), chest pain (OR 0.58, 95% CI, 0.39-0.86), syncope (OR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.23-1.01), dyspnea (OR 2.48, 95% CI, 1.57-3.91) and hemoptysis (OR 3.57, 95% CI, 1.40-9.07) were associated with diagnostic delay. Twenty-two patients (4.3%, 95%CI, 2.8-6.5) experienced an outcome event within 30 days. Among them, 15 patients (6.2% 95%CI, 3.7-10.3) had a diagnostic delay and 7 (2.6%, 95% CI 1.1-5.4) did not (p = 0.039). In this cohort, diagnostic delay is associated with the absence of major risk factors for PE or clinical features such as chest pain or syncope and the presence of dyspnea or hemoptysis. Diagnostic delay is associated with a worse 30-day prognosis.

Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Fragmin Versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in the Treatment of Acute Non Massive Pulmonary Embolism: An Open Randomized Pilot Study

Low-molecular-weight heparins have been extensively investigated in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis but limited data are available concerning their use in pulmonary embolism. In an open, pilot, randomized study, we compare the safety and efficacy of Fragmin, a low-molecular-weight heparin with those of unfractionated heparin in 60 patients with non massive pulmonary embolism (Miller Index < 20). Thirty one patients received unfractionated heparin intravenously and 29 received a fixed dose of 120 Anti-Xa IU/kg of Fragmin administered subcutaneously twice a day for 10 days. There was no pulmonary embolism recurrence nor major bleeding in either group during the treatment period. The decrease in pulmonary vascular obstruction on perfusion lung scan between day 0 and day 10 was 17 ± 13% in the Fragmin group and 16 ± 13% in the heparin group (NS). These results indicate that Fragmin may be a safe and effective treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism.

Clinically relevant bleeding in cancer patients treated for venous thromboembolism from the CATCH study

Essentials Cancer patients receiving anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism have an elevated bleeding risk. This secondary analysis of CATCH assessed characteristics of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). CRB occurs in 15% of cancer patients with thrombosis using therapeutic doses of anticoagulation. After multivariate analysis, risk factors for CRB were age >75 years and intracranial malignancy.

SUMMARY

Background Cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving anticoagulant treatment have an increased bleeding risk. Objectives We performed a prespecified secondary analysis of the randomized, open-label, Phase III CATCH trial (NCT01130025) to assess the rate and sites of and the risk factors for clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). Patients/Methods Patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic VTE received either tinzaparin 175 IU kg-1 once daily or warfarin (target International Normalized Ratio [INR] of 2.0-3.0) for 6 months. Fisher's exact test was used to screen prespecified clinical risk factors; those identified as being significantly associated with an increased risk of CRB then underwent competing risk regression analysis of time to first CRB. Results Among 900 randomized patients, 138 (15.3%) had 180 CRB events. CRB occurred in 60 patients (81 events) in the tinzaparin group and in 78 patients (99 events) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.89). Common bleeding sites were gastrointestinal (36.7%; n = 66), genitourinary (22.8%; n = 41), and nasal (10.0%; n = 18). In multivariate analysis, the risk of CRB increased with age > 75 years (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.14-2.94) and intracranial malignancy (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.07-3.62). In the warfarin group, 40.4% of CRB events occurred in patients with with an INR of < 3.0. A lower time in therapeutic range was associated with a higher risk of CRB. Conclusions CRB is a frequent complication in cancer patients with VTE during anticoagulant treatment, and is associated with age > 75 years and intracranial malignancy.

Renal Impairment, Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Cancer Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism—Analysis of the CATCH Study

Objective This article assesses the impact of renal impairment (RI) on the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis from the Comparison of Acute Treatments in Cancer Hemostasis (CATCH) study (NCT01130025).

Materials and Methods Renal function was assessed using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis who received either tinzaparin (175 IU/kg) once daily or warfarin for 6 months, in an open-label, randomized, multi-centre trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes. Associations between baseline RI (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min/1.73m2) and recurrent symptomatic or incidental venous thromboembolism (VTE), clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), major bleeding and death were assessed using Fisher's exact test.

Results Baseline-centralized GFR data were available for 864 patients (96% of study population). RI was found in 131 patients (15%; n = 69 tinzaparin). Recurrent VTE occurred in 14% of patients with and 8% of patients without RI (relative risk [RR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 2.85), CRB in 19% and 14%, respectively (RR 1.33; 95% CI 0.90, 1.98), major bleeding in 6.1% and 2.0%, respectively (RR 2.98; 95% CI 1.29, 6.90) and mortality rate was 40% and 34%, respectively (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.94, 1.53). Patients with RI on tinzaparin showed no difference in recurrent VTE, CRB, major bleeding or mortality rates versus those on warfarin.

Conclusion RI in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis on anticoagulation was associated with a statistically significant increase in recurrent VTE and major bleeding, but no significant increase in CRB or mortality. No differences were observed between long-term tinzaparin therapy and warfarin.

Vitamin D effects on monocytes' CCL-2, IL6 and CD14 transcription in Addison's disease and HLA susceptibility

Addison's disease is a rare autoimmune disorder leading to adrenal insufficiency and life-long glucocorticoid dependency. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms and vitamin D deficiency predispose to Addison's disease. Aim of the current study was, to investigate potential anti-inflammatory vitamin D effects on monocytes in Addison's disease, focusing on inflammatory CCL-2 and IL6, as well on monocyte CD14 markers. Addison's disease is genetically linked to distinct HLA susceptibility alleles. Therefore we analyzed, whether HLA genotypes differed for vitamin D effects on monocyte markers. CD14⁺ monocytes were isolated from Addison's disease patients (AD, n=13) and healthy controls (HC, n=15) and stimulated with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ and IL1β as an inflammatory stimulant. Cells were processed for mRNA expression of CCL-2, IL6 and CD14 and DNA samples were genotyped for major histocompatibility class (MHC) class II-encoded HLA- DQA1-DQB1 haplotypes. We found a downregulation of CCL-2 after vitamin D treatment in IL1β-stimulated monocytes both from AD patients and HC (AD p<0.001; HC p<0.0001). CD14 expression however, was upregulated in both HC and AD patients after vitamin D treatment (p<0.001, respectively). HC showed higher CD14 transcription level than AD patients after vitamin D treatment (p=0.04). Compared to IL1β-induced inflammation, HC have increased CD14 levels after vitamin D treatment (p<0.001), whereas the IL1β-induced CD14 expression of AD patients' monocytes did not change after vitamin D treatment (p=0.8). AD patients carrying HLA high-risk haplotypes showed an increased CCL-2 expression after IL1β-induced inflammation compared to intermediate-risk HLA carriers (p=0.05). Also HC monocytes' CD14 transcription after IL1β and vitamin D co-stimulation differed according to HLA risk profile. We show that vitamin D can exert anti-inflammatory effects on AD patients' monocytes which may be modulated by HLA risk genotypes.

Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The role of treatment with direct oral anticoagulant agents is unclear.

METHODS

In this open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients with cancer who had acute symptomatic or incidental venous thromboembolism to receive either low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 5 days followed by oral edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily (edoxaban group) or subcutaneous dalteparin at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for 1 month followed by dalteparin at a dose of 150 IU per kilogram once daily (dalteparin group). Treatment was given for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding during the 12 months after randomization, regardless of treatment duration.

RESULTS

Of the 1050 patients who underwent randomization, 1046 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 67 of the 522 patients (12.8%) in the edoxaban group as compared with 71 of the 524 patients (13.5%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.36; P=0.006 for noninferiority; P=0.87 for superiority). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 41 patients (7.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 59 patients (11.3%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, -3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 0.2). Major bleeding occurred in 36 patients (6.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 21 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower but the rate of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with dalteparin. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; Hokusai VTE Cancer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073682 .).

Initial strides for invent-VTE: Towards global collaboration to accelerate clinical research in venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major global burden of disease and requires collaborative efforts to conduct large, high-quality investigator-initiated and academically sponsored studies addressing the most relevant clinical questions. Owing to increasing regulatory requirements, the highly competitive nature of peer-reviewed funding and costs associated with conducting large, multinational clinical trials, completing practice-changing research constitutes a growing challenge for clinical investigators. As clinical trialists interested in VTE, we founded INVENT (International Network of Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Research Networks) in an effort to promote and accelerate patient-oriented, investigator-initiated, international collaborative research, to identify, prioritize and answer key clinical research questions for patients with VTE. We report on our activities to formalize the INVENT network and our accomplishments in our first year.